glad you request something like this to me
Tragedy
And I'm interested in nominating, feel free to poke me for a recheck.
Tragedy
- 00:13:441 (1,1) - minor one and even slider leniency would help avoid 100 but I still suggest you lower the spacing a bit so it doesn't look similar to previous 1/2 rhythm gaps
- 00:48:809 (5) - divide combo maybe? you did to other similar spacing changes in this section
- 01:45:651 (5) - consider this rhythm pattern https://puu.sh/wDxvK/d7b927a6c8.png ? it made 01:45:651 - 01:45:809 - better emphasized while playing
- 01:47:230 (1) - maybe ctrl-g? would make flow more natural imo
- 01:50:072 (1,2,3) - 1->2->3 movement is bit too sharp and requires a quick flow change at 01:50:546 (2,3) - , while the sound itself seems minor, so maybe you can try ctrl-g 3 so it breaks the flow at 01:51:020 (1) -
- 01:59:546 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - I somehow expect a stream with smaller spacing, why do you make it so hard here :\
- 02:09:493 (2) - minor, make it less curved so it looks similar to 02:09:967 (5,10) - in terms of visual, like 02:05:704 (2,5,10) -
- 02:15:178 (2) - whistle on body is intentional or a mistake? it seems the only one that has whistle in this part
- 02:31:599 (6) - maybe move this note left so spacing from 6->1 can be larger and emphasize the vocal better
- 02:43:441 - how you divide the drums suddenly changes here.. 02:39:335 - to 02:43:046 - is like o x x o x x o x x so 02:43:441 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this part should be redone imo
- 04:02:704 - ^ uh it seems more disordered here, maybe just me so I'd like to hear your thoughts about them
- 02:45:967 (1,2,3) - make it a flipping of previous combo like 04:08:388 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - so it flows differently?
- 04:50:703 (1,3) - hey i don't usually like mentioning blanket stuff but since it's intended why not just make it perfect
- 05:18:177 (6,7,8) - shouldn't this be a spaced triplet instead? check your similar patterns
- 06:00:177 (1) - 06:02:703 (1) - if you focus on drums then these notes should be deleted like how 05:57:651 - is skipped
- 06:07:756 (1) - maybe it's personal preference, I recommend you move this down to around 500,300. since music is going lower pitch i'd like to see movement suggests it too
- 06:30:177 (3) - the section is quite calm I suggest replacing the triplet with a 1/4 slider
- 06:36:177 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - similarly, I suggest using simple patterns instead
- 06:45:177 (7) - move to somewhere around 80,340? 06:45:334 (8) - can be better emphasized
- 08:50:229 (1) - stream should suggest a turn at this note like 00:26:230 (1) -
- 09:11:545 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - since 09:09:650 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - is same, maybe they should be the same too?
- 09:44:704 (3) - new combo for the slowdown? also cuz 09:44:230 (2) - is covering the slider tick so it's really hard to notice without actually playing but it's 9 mins now ppl would be mad if they break xD
- 09:47:230 (3) - ^ make it consistent if you agree with me above
- 10:00:493 (5) - hey i thought it's 1/2.. you can just make them closer it doesn't hurt visual imo
- 10:33:651 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - great, but could use some more buildups, the stream spacing barely changes before this pattern so it came totally out of my expectation
- 10:36:335 (5,6,7) - there can be a better alternative to simplify the rhythm, overmapping 1/6 burststream to the coming 1/3 drums is too sudden to me...
- 10:41:862 (1) - 10% = almost no feedback just increase volume a bit and you are good
- 10:45:966 (1) - delete nc like 10:49:756 (7) -
And I'm interested in nominating, feel free to poke me for a recheck.