One of the 'unpopular QATs' Monstrata mentioned here.
Dissolution of the current BN tiering system
Nothing against this. I think we need to have a more regular/frequent meeting to report BNs and vote, rather than doing it at random times, or taking 3 months to discuss and vote once. I guess it's something we can decide later, but I'm fine with this in general.
Beatmap Nominator acknowledgement
I'm all for this. I don't know how it was back in the old MAT / BAT system, but the best way to motivate BNs is to make them special. This would highly make BNs to feel their responsibility and be proud of themselves.
I really hope the new website also consider this seriously and apply it in some ways too, so that we can safely move on without arguments.
Beatmap Nominator rewards
To be honest, this reward thing will barely make the BNG active in general. There will be only very few super-active BNs who would work so hard for the rewards. For the others, it's just impossible to get it anyway. And for the 'competitive' BNs, they have to use any methods to get higher score, which could lead to yoloing icons, or only looking for ways to get higher score easily (even if they don't intend to consciously).
The scoring system we're going to implement is far from ideal, and rewarding one person upon such formula can lead to abusing it, rather than motivating people in general. So I'm quite hesitant on this one.
Divisions
Working as smaller groups has both good and bad sides. The good side is that the members would feel strong bond with the team members. However, there's a high chance that some of the members are not comfortable with the other members, therefore making the entire division silent and dead. So I'm good with merging groups and also making each BNs to select which team they would like to join in.
QAT changes
Although "QAT will be no longer barred (or discouraged) from bubbling, qualifying, or vetting qualified maps on their own." is not really a valid statement, I like the concept of it.
I'm fine with the 'report this map' button thing, but still it should contain a field to explain the reason of reporting, and further discussion between the reporter and the mapper should be continued.
The new specific ranking criteria is already quite loose and I don't really see much need to simplify it even further. We're already working on some anyway.
For the other things, yeah I think it's alright.
QAT rewards
I'm happy with it. Hope I can get that reward of course.
Returning agency
Good with this one too. It's good for both BN/QAT to construct a large group that manages the beatmapping community, and we want more communication between us. Therefore it's necessary to let BNs also participate in voting the QAT leaders so that the majority of the members can be satisfied with the selection.
I hope the "staff" have more interest on the team and try to communicate with us however, even if they don't directly lead the team or anything.