mod
Bummer-
before doing anything I'll link you a similar 1/6 ranked song real quick because I think it's useful for reference https://osu.ppy.sh/b/350921 also, this song is very very repetitive so my suggestions can apply to everywhere else where the song is the same, so you can apply if you agree with what I'm saying
00:13:042 (1) - make it so it's pointing towards 2
00:18:185 (1,2,3) - you space 1->2 much more than what you did here 00:11:328 (1,2,3) - and 00:14:757 (1,2,3) - , try to be somewhat consistent
00:46:900 (3,4) - I think some of your 1/2 notes in general, you might want to consider using 2/3 sliders like this http://puu.sh/ujc2o/6352b3788b.jpg it's a very good swing feeling
01:02:328 (2,3) - 01:00:828 (3,4) - same with these. also these 01:33:400 (3,4,5,6,7) -
01:39:614 - sure you're not mapping this break? I think there are interesting possibilities with the rhythm and you can soften volume
01:47:221 (4,5,6,7,8) - another thing about structure if you compare where you place 8 and this one 01:48:935 (4,5,6,7,8) - they're totally different
01:52:685 (7,8) - same here as well. I think 7 can be a 2/3 slider and 8 can be a 5/6 slider
02:09:614 (4,5,6,7,1) - all streams are straight and this is suddenly curved in a wave
02:10:471 (3,4,5) - why are these so cramped? comparing with 02:00:292 (2,3) - 02:02:007 (2,3) - 02:05:435 (2,3,4) -
02:28:471 (4) - can be 2 sliders here too, second one starting from 02:28:900
02:37:042 (4,1) - why so close to each other? give them some spacing
03:14:328 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - don't think there should be a 1/2 jump section in this, one simple example is just 03:21:185 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - where the spacing seems completely random and not following anything. starting from this 03:21:614 (4) - music goes higher and higher until 03:22:257 (7) - . your spacing should reflect that
03:29:328 (1,2,3,4) - I don't like ignoring the second blue tick here at all 03:29:650 03:30:078, I would just follow what you did all before this 03:22:471 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - or use 1/4 notes (streams increasing in intensity)
04:11:614 (3,4,5,6,1,2) - not consistent. 1->2 is same distance as 3->4 4->5 5->6 but there's so much break between 1 2
04:51:614 (1) - maybe ctrl+g for better emphasis
really increasing the amount of swing sliders would make this map a lot better
#before doing anything I'll link you a similar 1/6 ranked song real quick because I think it's useful for reference https://osu.ppy.sh/b/350921 also, this song is very very repetitive so my suggestions can apply to everywhere else where the song is the same, so you can apply if you agree with what I'm saying
00:13:042 (1) - make it so it's pointing towards 2
00:18:185 (1,2,3) - you space 1->2 much more than what you did here 00:11:328 (1,2,3) - and 00:14:757 (1,2,3) - , try to be somewhat consistent
00:46:900 (3,4) - I think some of your 1/2 notes in general, you might want to consider using 2/3 sliders like this http://puu.sh/ujc2o/6352b3788b.jpg it's a very good swing feeling
01:02:328 (2,3) - 01:00:828 (3,4) - same with these. also these 01:33:400 (3,4,5,6,7) -
01:39:614 - sure you're not mapping this break? I think there are interesting possibilities with the rhythm and you can soften volume
01:47:221 (4,5,6,7,8) - another thing about structure if you compare where you place 8 and this one 01:48:935 (4,5,6,7,8) - they're totally different
01:52:685 (7,8) - same here as well. I think 7 can be a 2/3 slider and 8 can be a 5/6 slider
02:09:614 (4,5,6,7,1) - all streams are straight and this is suddenly curved in a wave
02:10:471 (3,4,5) - why are these so cramped? comparing with 02:00:292 (2,3) - 02:02:007 (2,3) - 02:05:435 (2,3,4) -
02:28:471 (4) - can be 2 sliders here too, second one starting from 02:28:900
02:37:042 (4,1) - why so close to each other? give them some spacing
03:14:328 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - don't think there should be a 1/2 jump section in this, one simple example is just 03:21:185 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - where the spacing seems completely random and not following anything. starting from this 03:21:614 (4) - music goes higher and higher until 03:22:257 (7) - . your spacing should reflect that
03:29:328 (1,2,3,4) - I don't like ignoring the second blue tick here at all 03:29:650 03:30:078, I would just follow what you did all before this 03:22:471 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - or use 1/4 notes (streams increasing in intensity)
04:11:614 (3,4,5,6,1,2) - not consistent. 1->2 is same distance as 3->4 4->5 5->6 but there's so much break between 1 2
04:51:614 (1) - maybe ctrl+g for better emphasis
really increasing the amount of swing sliders would make this map a lot better