Averaging at nearly 1 post every 30 seconds it's incredible.Cirno-baka9 wrote:
15 pages of people disagreeing and they still haven't changed...
forum
Mapset and Spread Restructure (Proposed)
posted
Total Posts
614
This REALLY damages mapsets which are over 10 minutes, like one I'm working on now, since making a new whole easier diff not only is extremely time consuming (considering mine is 16 mins) but the currently difficulty is all about working with the atmosphere of the original song, so it has easy and hard parts, so making an easier diff would make no sense.
I could say that for shorter approval maps having multiple diffs is more acceptable, but for way longer ones? No way.
I could say that for shorter approval maps having multiple diffs is more acceptable, but for way longer ones? No way.
OK, this looks fine.
Bubbled.
ztrot wrote:
Hello everyone, ztrot here with some retarded new bullshit!
this is just plain stupid and why is someone that doesnt even map anymore taking decisions?
hilariosu
enjoy ur life ppl, think wat u doing with life, or feet.
To top it all off, this is pretty fucking hilarious:
I hope you enjoyed having your opinion heard, the many thousands of asian standard mappers out there! That's what the staff really thinks of you; they didn't even bother to invite you to their little discussion!
(edit: yes I know frosty maps, but they didn't even bother inviting a Chinese/Japanese/Taiwanese/Korean mapper; someone from one of the largest countries inside osu? Come on, that's absolutely ridiculous.)
I hope you enjoyed having your opinion heard, the many thousands of asian standard mappers out there! That's what the staff really thinks of you; they didn't even bother to invite you to their little discussion!
(edit: yes I know frosty maps, but they didn't even bother inviting a Chinese/Japanese/Taiwanese/Korean mapper; someone from one of the largest countries inside osu? Come on, that's absolutely ridiculous.)
Doesn't hurt to try something, but having further elaboration on the reasoning behind the mentioned changes would be really good to help us grasp the situation and the council's ideals.
you guys instead of let your emotions controls you , better date me for valentine dude , its been 47 mins and i dont have gf sad
i think the funiest part of this is when a BN tell you to map a new Insane to fill the gap between a GD Insane and your Hard, and after see this stupid rule coming from nowhere and is contradictory with everything peoples agrees on it.
JUST CHANGE IT ! DO IT ! YES YOU CAN !
Just listen to all the people who already complain here, and all other who will stop mapping just because of this rule who destroy everything.
JUST CHANGE IT ! DO IT ! YES YOU CAN !
Just listen to all the people who already complain here, and all other who will stop mapping just because of this rule who destroy everything.
Same tbhRumia- wrote:
you guys instead of let your emotions controls you , better date me for valentine dude , its been 47 mins and i dont have gf sad
The second rule is seems illogical as there is no set definition what difficulty includes which gameplay-elements.
Depending on the song different gameplay-elements are appropriate to reflect the song, making it impossible to judge what difficulty name a map should receive.
The only way I see is classifying the difficulties after the gameplayelements in a scheme like
So my difficulty(3,8*) may be called
124;2;-;1.8;10;10;Flowbased Sliders on high/changing SV
opposed to my second difficulty(3.6*)
1248;4;1.5;1.4;3;0;Changing Directions a lot+Streamjumps+Kicksliders
Which again, no casual player wants to read or understand.
With the current icons - which are known to not reflect difficulty properly - naming difficulties isnot easy impossible and it kind of fucks with all difficulty naming so far.
While I think that fucking with difficulty naming in standard and making it tie to gameplayelement usage is a very good idea this is FAR away from being polished and usable.
If you already do stuff while excluding the public you should try to think stuff to its end instead of making a scheme and then posting it into the forums. I'm very dissatisfied with having such a halfhearted piece of a rulescheme thrown at me.
If you are going to rewrite RC you have to consider every part of it. It doesn't make sense to write one part, toss it to the hard rules and then write the next one without really caring about context.
kudosu pls - oh wait, kudosu are stil useless...
Depending on the song different gameplay-elements are appropriate to reflect the song, making it impossible to judge what difficulty name a map should receive.
The only way I see is classifying the difficulties after the gameplayelements in a scheme like
Used snaps; Most Used Spacing(time);DS Used; SV Used;Frequency of DS Changes; Frequency of SV Changes; Main Patterns used
So my difficulty(3,8*) may be called
124;2;-;1.8;10;10;Flowbased Sliders on high/changing SV
opposed to my second difficulty(3.6*)
1248;4;1.5;1.4;3;0;Changing Directions a lot+Streamjumps+Kicksliders
Which again, no casual player wants to read or understand.
With the current icons - which are known to not reflect difficulty properly - naming difficulties is
While I think that fucking with difficulty naming in standard and making it tie to gameplayelement usage is a very good idea this is FAR away from being polished and usable.
If you already do stuff while excluding the public you should try to think stuff to its end instead of making a scheme and then posting it into the forums. I'm very dissatisfied with having such a halfhearted piece of a rulescheme thrown at me.
If you are going to rewrite RC you have to consider every part of it. It doesn't make sense to write one part, toss it to the hard rules and then write the next one without really caring about context.
kudosu pls - oh wait, kudosu are stil useless...
I'm pretty sure every single person who has ever played osu! disagrees with the new rules.
Hey guys, calm down and let's look at the positive side of this newly amended rule!!!
Are you experiencing difficulty in gathering modders on your E-N-H-I-I-I-I mapset? Exciting news!!! Enjoy your time deciding what difficulty to remove from your mapset, that you have dedicated your time towards osu! mapping!!! No your beatmap will be E-N-H-I for the community to look, and lazzzzy modders would get more interested to look your map!!!
Concerned about the restriction of having only 1 insane, while you prefer to having another insane with a different style??? Why waste your mapping ability for an insane??? Focus your full mapping abilities towards "Ultra"-classified difficulty, and make 20 kinds of various Ultra difficulties!!!
Are you experiencing difficulty in gathering modders on your E-N-H-I-I-I-I mapset? Exciting news!!! Enjoy your time deciding what difficulty to remove from your mapset, that you have dedicated your time towards osu! mapping!!! No your beatmap will be E-N-H-I for the community to look, and lazzzzy modders would get more interested to look your map!!!
Concerned about the restriction of having only 1 insane, while you prefer to having another insane with a different style??? Why waste your mapping ability for an insane??? Focus your full mapping abilities towards "Ultra"-classified difficulty, and make 20 kinds of various Ultra difficulties!!!
2016 will be great guys! I love you <3Len wrote:
calm down moe ppls
we can make 1903280192380912star diff and can get ranke now
its very interesting rule
holy shit this blew way the fuck up lmfao
in all seriousness, why? why are you attempting to restrict the amount of ranked maps by making it artificially harder to get a set / diff ranked? makes no sense to me.
also, insane or below for 1 diff approval mapsets? are you joking?
in all seriousness, why? why are you attempting to restrict the amount of ranked maps by making it artificially harder to get a set / diff ranked? makes no sense to me.
also, insane or below for 1 diff approval mapsets? are you joking?
Horrible rules are happening._underjoy wrote:
what the hell is happening here
please reconsider approval maps that are over 10 minutes, idk if 20 min marathon that is an extra needs to have a insane, it's just a pain and probably a lot of extra or higher marathons won't be made now
quick add me on skyp b4 u get 400h silence !!1 xd
I so agree with this, especially as my 23 min project is even only one song, not some kind of compilation ;_;Arphimigon wrote:
This REALLY damages mapsets which are over 10 minutes, like one I'm working on now, since making a new whole easier diff not only is extremely time consuming (considering mine is 16 mins) but the currently difficulty is all about working with the atmosphere of the original song, so it has easy and hard parts, so making an easier diff would make no sense.
I could say that for shorter approval maps having multiple diffs is more acceptable, but for way longer ones? No way.
DeletedUser_3886246
Loctav wrote:
We went through that change with these people t/420229VINXIS wrote:
Edit: was there even discussion witht he community or qats hOLY
"The aim of this project is to adjust the Ranking Criteria to the today's needs".
Might have missed it but I cant find any information about what "today's needs" is, or for what purpose the change is being made. This change should result in less maps so im guessing there is a good reason for this change?
i will date u 4 valentineRumia- wrote:
you guys instead of let your emotions controls you , better date me for valentine dude , its been 47 mins and i dont have gf sad
I honestly don't understand why we need these changes
just no
my map is NHH diff and if I do NHI the I will be overmap what should I do aaaaaaa
I hope this is just a meme
I hope this is just a meme
this is probably a huge prank gone wrong in the hood :^)
Everything I wanted to say has been said already but I mean, what were you thinking guys? Who does this benefit? I don't really mind the approval rule, but one diff per icon? As others have said, this doesn't benefit players, who now have less variety, it kills mappers and GD mappers who want to express the song their way, and if, as you said, the mapper must make a new mapset for more diffs, doesn't that create more work for the BNG and QAT? Work that is unnecessary since you could just have all the Insanes in one mapset? I don't understand, to be perfectly honest.
ok bby wats ur name we can fugRumia- wrote:
quick add me on skyp b4 u get 400h silence !!1 xd
do post as f
just dumb...
I remember when someone talked with me about some ideas of rules that we could add. They told us that we should ask to the community what they think about our ideas of rules.
AND YOU ADD THIS LIKE THAT WITHOUT LETTING THE COMMUNITY THINK ABOUT IT?
is this 1st April?
AND YOU ADD THIS LIKE THAT WITHOUT LETTING THE COMMUNITY THINK ABOUT IT?
is this 1st April?
yea