1. Easy (1.61 stars, 136 notes)
2. Hard (2.96 stars, 290 notes)
3. Normal (1.94 stars, 175 notes)
4. Obsession (3.64 stars, 351 notes)

Strategas wrote:

now I got the word dick stuck in my head. Fuck.

Strategas wrote:

Hi m4m

[Insane]

AR 9 might be too much for such a low bpm song considering you only put OD 7 here Nah, AR 9 still plays nice imo. But I guess if this will keep this map from getting ranked, then I'll change it.

00:00:490 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - all these either go vertical or and the last one goes neither imo make the 00:04:019 (1,2,3,4) - same as the 4th one or the other way around Hmm, no fix for now, since this doesn't really affect gameplay at all and I did it on purpose. But will see what other modders say.
00:07:548 (1) - until 00:15:931 (4) - lol the whole begining goes in the same direction, you could make it more interesting imo and use more paterns too This more my own mapping style and I really focus on flow so that's why it seems as if everything is going in a circle. I don't think it's such a bad thing, but if another modder suggests something better, then I'll consider it.
00:09:754 (2,3,1) - linear paterns are shit to play when their spacing is different Fine, lowered 00:10:195 (1) - a bit so the pattern is less linear.
00:15:931 (4) - I'm guessing your ran out of space here that you decided to stop the patern before. It was rather cool then the slider ruins it do something like 00:25:195 (1,2,3,4) - Yes, I did run out of space, but I don't see how the last slider makes the pattern uncool. Keep for now.
00:19:901 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - if you're using 7 objects here as jumps and wanted to make a star then make a 7 object star and not a 6 one I don't really see a difference >.< It's still a nice star with the 6 objects.
00:16:372 (1,2) - imo continuing the slider thing before would be good here and then put circles 00:16:813 (3) - from here instead to the vocals like you did here 00:28:725 (1,2,3,4,1) - Ok, changed the first two circles into a slider and then placed circles where the other slider was.
00:19:901 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - rather questionable increase of spacing. I mean the vocal disappears here yet you map this part as if it were more intense than before. Lol, the jumps are so small and I can't make this insane too easy. Damn.
00:27:622 (3,4,5,6) - questionable spacing Again, I have to put in some jumps at least and those jumps are not insane. They are rather puny, but I'll wait for other opinions.
00:33:137 (3) - shouldn't this be more emphasized than 00:32:695 (2) - ? Moved 00:32:254 (1) - closer to (2) so the jump isn't that big.
00:40:195 (3) - ^ Moved 00:39:754 (2) - a bit closer to (1). Again to lessen that jump.
00:43:725 (3,4) - circles? Nah, since I placed circles after those two sliders.
00:47:254 (4) - idk in earlier parts you spaced this out more than here Will wait for more opinions.
00:49:901 (1,2,3,4,5) - this is kinda too spaced compared to 00:51:666 (1,2,3,4,5) - Yeah, I agree. Made the jumps in the first pattern less intense.
01:15:489 (3) - this would make more sense to change form of slider than on 01:15:931 (4) - since it was much stronger It really doesn't matter imo, lol
01:24:534 (5) - space this out some more it's definetely stronger than 01:24:092 (3) - Both of these 01:24:313 (4,5) - are strong and I already added a jump there to emphasize those two beats. I don't like to add a jump with just one circle alone.
01:25:637 (2) - could put this more down to flow better in a circular motion since you based all of your map on it. I stacked and I think it's fine as it is.

Regarding the jumps seemed a little random to me when the song intensity stays the same. Ah the thing I mentioned kinda repeats often so might want to check on some more places if you agree to my points. Rhythm maybe too boring I only see 1/2 stuff here. Why is it when only I use jumps, people have a problem with it, lol. But anyway, I don't want this to be a Hard. I want it to be an Insane so of course I added a few random jumps cuz what else can I do and I think it fits in nicely with the music and vocals. The diff may seem a bit boring but honestly this is just how the song is imo. I can't think of a different way to map it.

[Hard dic]
00:17:254 (3,4) - fix blanket Blanket looks fine to me >.<
00:19:460 (4) - feels too curved Curved the slider less
00:16:372 (1,1) - why don't you emphasize these in the same way as 00:14:607 (1) - 00:21:666 (1) - I guess I was afraid of too many jumps, but I fixed it nonetheless.
00:21:225 (5,6,1) - also the linear thing I mentioned in insane Meh, it's fine here.
00:36:666 (3,3) - imo space these out the same way as in downbeat nvm you don't do that anywhere else so keep it
01:53:431 (1) - space more ? to 2x Hmm, sorry, but it looks so far to me

that's pretty much it gl!
now I got the word dick stuck in my head. Fuck.

Left wrote:

from M4M~
sorry for my low quality English, I studied English not so hard in school XD

01:38:872 - I think here is more suitable for Preview Point...just an opinion. I like the addicted part more.

[Hard]

00:09:975 (3,4) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4182412 to perfect blanket. I don't really see a difference . . .
00:17:254 (3,4) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4182419 blanket. Fine, made a small change.
00:40:195 (3) - in here, vocal is relatively high, so emphasis using DS would be nice I think. I think it'll look weird if I suddenly place a jump here. I placed important jumps at other places so I don't think I have to add a jump here as well.
00:47:254 (3,4) - blanket these two would make more nice shape...I think. I made these two sliders' shape the same, so I can't blanket otherwise their shape will differ.
01:14:607 (1,2,3) - I can't know why put more distance between 01:14:607 (1,2) - this... vocal is more higher in 01:14:607 (1,2,3) - here. Not really an issue, I just wanted to create an interesting pattern with (1) and (2)
01:18:798 (2,3) - also imperfect blanket http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4182445 Made a very slight fix
01:25:085 - you missed one drum beat here I think it's a bit uncomfortable to hear... Yeah, I agree. I changed that triplet into a repeat slider so that that drum sound is mapped.
01:27:842 (4,5,6) - considering this song, you should use clap in 5, 6 notes. and It would be more nice if you use DS difference to emphasize it. The claps are on 4 and 5 in the music and I don't want to use jumps there.
01:51:666 (1,2,3,4) - curving with same angle would be more nice, now it's not. Looks fine to me . . .

[Insane]

00:32:254 (1,2,3,4) - same as Hard diff, you can control DS according to vocal,and I think it will make this map more fun. I focused my jumps on other places.
00:41:519 (2,3,4,5,6) - I think you intended star shape pattern, http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4182540 now it's not. Made a slight change
00:56:739 (5,1) - I think it's a bit uncomfortable to play. Will wait for more opinions on this.
01:24:313 (4,5) - used same whistlesound, equally emphasized in song. but 01:24:313 (4,5) - distance between these two is very close compared to 01:24:092 (3,4) - this. It would be very uncomfortable to play.. Hmm, I just added a jump between (3) and (4) to emphasize those two strong beats. I don't think it's uncomfortable to play though, but I'll wait for more opinions.
01:28:063 (5,6) - same as Hard diff, clap should be here. Added a clap on (5). Missed it.

Strategas wrote:

now I got the word dick stuck in my head. Fuck.

I like this song, really addictive~
Good ☆Luck

FCL wrote:

sdasdasd
M4M from your queue
BG a little stretched, although you yourself know about it Yeah, I know Already asked Ringating to help me with this.

• [Hard]

1. 00:00:490 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2) - okay, i think you can improve this monent and now i will show how (it's just suggestion you can easy ignore it
   

   160,124,490,5,0,0:0:0:0:
   356,124,931,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   356,319,1372,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   160,319,1813,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   160,89,2254,5,0,0:0:0:0:
   380,128,2695,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   342,345,3137,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   122,306,3578,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   148,63,4019,5,0,0:0:0:0:
   400,107,4460,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   363,350,4902,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   101,304,5342,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   136,40,5784,5,0,0:0:0:0:
   420,90,6225,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   378,356,6667,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   84,304,7107,1,0,0:0:0:0:

   I thinks this model of mapping will be better since:
   The tension in music increased and increasing the spacing perfect looks here
   Beats are too strong therefore sliders looks bad here I agree. Used this example that you gave me.
2. 00:24:313 (3) - make it more symmetrical i guess Nah, looks fine to me.
3. 00:33:137 (3) - move to 404 12 for blanket maybe? Fixed
4. 00:50:784 (3) - improve the blanket Made a slight change
5. 01:00:489 (1,2,3,4) - methinks there is something wrong. You changed position through each next slider, it's looks weird imo. What about hold position (idk what i say lol, just look at screenshot http://puu.sh/m522w/daba959a77.jpg&#41; I agree. Followed your suggestion.
6. 01:05:784 (1) - same as 00:24:313 (3) It's fine.
7. 01:19:901 (1) - ^ ^

• [Insane]

1. 00:00:490 (1,2,3,4) - aaaaaa, maybe copy 00:02:254 (1,2,3,4) - and ctrl+H? It's struggling to work since it messes up the spacing and if you are worried by symmetry or something, I really don't think it's such a big deal.
2. 00:33:578 (4) - straight slider looks unnecessary, maybe create blanket with 00:32:254 (1) - ? http://puu.sh/m52Hz/70bc7a0650.jpg Nah, I like my straight slider more
3. 01:15:931 (4) - same, follow to previous models will be better It really doesn't matter
4. 01:39:313 (1) - but you use less spacing 01:25:195 (1) - here No, it's still the same DS, it's just because I made the SV in the kiai faster so that's why the distance is farther.
5. 01:52:989 (6) - I am ready to burst from the pressure of music here, more spacing will be nice Nah, the spacing is already quite big imo.
6. 01:52:989 (6,1) - ^ ^

1. I’m not sure if it’s just me, but I think your offset might be a little off; try adjusting it by -20ms or something around that number, e.g. your red uninherited timing point should be at roughly 470

1. 00:26:078 (3) – I noticed that 00:25:637 (2) – is a 49 degree rotation of 00:25:195 (1) –; the (3) stands out a little bit because it’s not the same rotation. Maybe move it to x42, y142 and then rotate it by 2 degrees counter-clockwise from its selection centre to create the same shape/distance here?
   
   SPOILER

   
2. following up from the above suggestion, maybe you can move 00:26:519 (4) – to x56, y305 so the distance between these notes is the same… You’re also probably going to want to fix the distance between 00:26:519 (4,5) – as well if you go with this suggestion
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:45:489 (4) – this blanket could be a little better in my opinion; it looks a little bit too curved, so maybe loosen the curve a bit? Remember to make 00:45:931 (5) – the same shape as well
   
   before

   
   after

   
4. 00:47:254 (3,4) – I don’t think using the same shape here would be the best idea here; the (4) looks a little bit too curved as a result, so maybe just make the (4) a blanket?
5. 01:28:284 (6) – Maybe flip the curve on this slider here so the flow is a little more circular?
   
   SPOILER

   

1. 00:15:489 (3) – similar to Hard, I noticed 00:15:048 (2) – is a 30 degree rotation of 00:14:607 (1) -; the (3) stands out a little bit because its placement is a little off from the pattern that you can create here. Maybe try moving it to x240, y226? Remember to fix 00:15:931 (4) – so that it blankets the (3) if you go with this suggestion
2. 00:25:195 (1,2,3,4) – similar suggestion to the above suggestion; try moving the (3) to x353, y155 and the (4) to x425, y103
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:26:960 (1) – why not use the same slider shape as 00:26:519 (4) - ? It might look a little bit nicer visually, but that’s just my opinion; what you have also works
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:32:254 (1,2) – these two shapes are different from each other; maybe use the same shape?
5. 01:06:666 (3) – similar to the first suggestion I gave you; maybe move this to x204, y202 to make this pattern more consistent
6. 01:15:489 (4) – similar to the above; move to x359, y196
7. 01:25:195 (1) – why the shift in snap distance for this burst here? Even if it’s to emphasize the finish on the downbeat, the larger distance might cause some frustrating combo breaks; maybe you should just stick to the same distance snap for this burst?
8. 01:39:313 (1) – ^

1. Change Audio Lead-In to 1000~2000 just to be safe.
2. Last green line is unnessesary, but it's not a big deal.

1. 00:11:519 (3) - I prefer to move this a little to left, idk why, but i want to move it lol. Maybe around 424|256 or something.
2. 00:18:137 (1) - Ctrl J this slider could be better works imo.
3. 00:36:666 (3) - Why you don't curve this stronger? I did this thingy.
4. 01:03:137 (3) - Move this around 404|152 for cleanup da gameplayzz.
5. 01:04:019 (1) - I highly recommend to put this slider more to up, like 272|284 for better transision with slider and circle tho.
6. 01:12:842 (1,2,3) - Try other pattern, something like this i guess.
7. 01:43:725 (3) - 224|224 for the sake of flow?

Ok, that's all. Insane is cool. Good luck -Nya-!!~

Doormat wrote:

Oh hey M4M thing from your queue-
[]
[General]

1. I’m not sure if it’s just me, but I think your offset might be a little off; try adjusting it by -20ms or something around that number, e.g. your red uninherited timing point should be at roughly 470 Hmm, I'm not sure about this. Will wait for other opinions before I do anything to the timing.

[Hard]

1. 00:26:078 (3) – I noticed that 00:25:637 (2) – is a 49 degree rotation of 00:25:195 (1) –; the (3) stands out a little bit because it’s not the same rotation. Maybe move it to x42, y142 and then rotate it by 2 degrees counter-clockwise from its selection centre to create the same shape/distance here? Did something.
   
   SPOILER

   
2. following up from the above suggestion, maybe you can move 00:26:519 (4) – to x56, y305 so the distance between these notes is the same… You’re also probably going to want to fix the distance between 00:26:519 (4,5) – as well if you go with this suggestion I like my placement more.
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:45:489 (4) – this blanket could be a little better in my opinion; it looks a little bit too curved, so maybe loosen the curve a bit? Remember to make 00:45:931 (5) – the same shape as well Nah, it's fine.
   
   before

   
   after

   
4. 00:47:254 (3,4) – I don’t think using the same shape here would be the best idea here; the (4) looks a little bit too curved as a result, so maybe just make the (4) a blanket? Since someone else also pointed this out, I'll change it.
5. 01:28:284 (6) – Maybe flip the curve on this slider here so the flow is a little more circular? Ok, fixed.
   
   SPOILER

   

[Insane]

1. 00:15:489 (3) – similar to Hard, I noticed 00:15:048 (2) – is a 30 degree rotation of 00:14:607 (1) -; the (3) stands out a little bit because its placement is a little off from the pattern that you can create here. Maybe try moving it to x240, y226? Remember to fix 00:15:931 (4) – so that it blankets the (3) if you go with this suggestion I like my current placement more.
2. 00:25:195 (1,2,3,4) – similar suggestion to the above suggestion; try moving the (3) to x353, y155 and the (4) to x425, y103 Followed your suggestion.
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:26:960 (1) – why not use the same slider shape as 00:26:519 (4) - ? It might look a little bit nicer visually, but that’s just my opinion; what you have also works I agree with you. Fixed that slider.
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:32:254 (1,2) – these two shapes are different from each other; maybe use the same shape? No, they are the same.
5. 01:06:666 (3) – similar to the first suggestion I gave you; maybe move this to x204, y202 to make this pattern more consistent Fixed
6. 01:15:489 (4) – similar to the above; move to x359, y196 Fixed
7. 01:25:195 (1) – why the shift in snap distance for this burst here? Even if it’s to emphasize the finish on the downbeat, the larger distance might cause some frustrating combo breaks; maybe you should just stick to the same distance snap for this burst? I don't know. Still looks quite easy to play to me. But will wait for further opinions.
8. 01:39:313 (1) – ^ ^

[]
Yeah that’s it; hope this helps

Kalibe wrote:

Let's go. Give me a fix on Hard.

1. Change Audio Lead-In to 1000~2000 just to be safe. Fixed
2. Last green line is unnessesary, but it's not a big deal. Fixed

Hard :

1. 00:11:519 (3) - I prefer to move this a little to left, idk why, but i want to move it lol. Maybe around 424|256 or something. Fixed
2. 00:18:137 (1) - Ctrl J this slider could be better works imo. Nah, keep as is.
3. 00:36:666 (3) - Why you don't curve this stronger? I did this thingy. Mine is fine to me.
4. 01:03:137 (3) - Move this around 404|152 for cleanup da gameplayzz. Fixed
5. 01:04:019 (1) - I highly recommend to put this slider more to up, like 272|284 for better transision with slider and circle tho. Ok, fixed.
6. 01:12:842 (1,2,3) - Try other pattern, something like this i guess. I like mine more.
7. 01:43:725 (3) - 224|224 for the sake of flow? Fixed

Ok, that's all. Insane is cool. Good luck -Nya-!!~

Also i hope you didn't forget about recheck on my map, right? ;w; I'm not a BN anymore, so I don't think my mod will matter anymore, lol.

Strategas wrote:

not gonna lie but it's hard to make a insane on this kind of bpm and not intense song at all. if you want to add jumps make sure they are supported by the music and not when you decide to. like the only part that would support bigger jumps is the kiai and if you really wanted difficulty there just use less sliders and more circles. 01:52:548 (5,6) - 01:42:842 (1,6) - this for example could be circles and it would add enough intensity for your insane.

• 
  
  As I told you in-game I think there is too much 1/2 and it would be better to simplify it a bit (and even by doing this it will still have plenty of 1/2 patterns imo).

1. 00:15:269 (2,4) - I think these are unnecessary because the song is still calm here and there is nothing much to emphasize so I would rather remove these, just like you did between these 00:18:137 (1,2) -
2. 00:19:019 (2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - a lot of 1/2 after each other for a long time, it would be better to make it easier, example: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4196398 - http://puu.sh/m76vt/dfbc5c0a98.jpg
3. 00:23:210 (4) - remove this to have a small break after the 1/2
4. 00:34:681 (2) - remove this to make it easier and also because the background sounds aren't loud enough to be emphasized (at least not on Normal) - on the other hand you could also try this:
   00:34:901 (3) - maybe this would fit better to the rhythm - http://puu.sh/m76Eg/b5f6525ad6.jpg because it is weird to end (3) on the start of the vocals, it should be a circle or a slider start imo
5. 00:37:328 (4) - remove for a small break
6. 00:45:269 (2) - remove either this OR 00:46:151 (4) - but I think here there needs to be a small break because there is a lot of 1/2 or you can choose a different way as well - http://puu.sh/m76Qo/f75094d86b.jpg - because you end the slider at a bad place again, something should start there and not end, example: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4196469
7. 00:48:798 (2,3,4) - same ^ - example: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4196454 and move this up 00:51:225 (2) -
8. 00:52:989 (2) - I don't really see a reason to keep this because the song is very calm and there aren't any vocals except from that weird little sound, but if this was removed it might emphasize the loud new start here 00:53:431 (1) -
9. 00:54:092 (2,2) - remove these for a little break
10. 01:03:137 (3) - you end the slider at a place where a slider should start or there should be a hit circle, example: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4196499 - http://puu.sh/m77j0/3e591ab3c4.jpg
11. 01:05:563 (4) - remove for a little break
12. 01:11:739 (2,4) - similar to 00:15:269 (2,4) - I think it's unnecessary to emphasize because it is not that loud (ofc it fits the song but it just makes it harder) and there are no vocals either
13. 01:17:034 (2,4) - same here, I can hear that it fits but it makes the pattern really long without any breaks so I think it's better to remove them
14. 01:19:681 (4) - remove this for a break and also because by removing it you can give a bigger emphasize to 01:19:901 (1) -
15. 01:34:019 (1,2) - this kind of pattern is usually put on harder difficulties in my opinion, so simplifying it would be better - http://puu.sh/m77zV/45bd565388.jpg
16. 01:43:504 (2) - remove for a break
17. 01:45:269 (2) - same ^
18. 01:48:798 (2,4) - same as 01:17:034 (2,4) - so I would suggest removing them
19. 01:49:901 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - too much 1/2 basically unnecessarily because as I said you should put this kind of 1/2 in harder difficulties only, example: http://puu.sh/m77Lj/b8593b271d.jpg OR http://puu.sh/m77PT/b423899e00.jpg

1. 00:34:681 (4,5) - I didn't really like the flow here while playing, it would feel better to play if (5) lead downwards instead of upwards, example: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4195926
2. 01:04:460 (2) - it would be better to click circles rather than a slider because of the vocals, the slider also follows the vocals but circles fit better, just like you did here 01:05:342 (4,5) -
3. 01:06:225 (2) - same ^
4. 01:15:931 (4) - same ^ but suggestion: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4195966 - I think this kind of jump would fit to vocals, since 01:16:372 (1) - here they are a big higher, I think it would be fun to play
5. 01:22:328 (4,5) - same as the first suggestion, I think the flow could be improved here, example: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4195996

Inyuschan wrote:

Post my map in description and I'll mod :v

• [Easy]

1. 00:09:313 (3) - maybe need NC here?
2. 00:12:842 (3) - same.
3. 00:51:666 (4) - make to more symmetry.
4. 01:14:166 (5,1) - little blanket error.

• [Normal]

1. 00:14:166 (4,1) - swap NC
2. 00:16:372 (1) - remove NC
3. 00:17:695 (2,1) - swap NC
4. 00:21:225 (4,1) - same.
5. 00:23:431 (1) - remoe NC
6. 00:24:754 (2,1) - swap NC
7. 00:24:754 (2,1,3,1) - same.
8. 00:51:666 (1) - remove NC
9. 00:58:725 (1) - same.
10. 01:02:254 (1) - ^
11. 01:03:798 (4,1) - swap NC
    after all same beat and vocals swap & remove. i think much better NCs.
    Only NCs. map is fine!

• 
  [Hard]
  i think, this diff need more symmetry.

1. 00:12:842 (1) - how about x : 208 y : 284?
2. 00:30:489 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this comboes are litle boring imo. you can change some pattern. i trust.
3. 01:17:695 (4,1) - more make same angle.

• 
  [Insane]
  

1. 00:00:490 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - easier than hard? this patr needs more large distance imo.
2. 00:27:401 (2,3,4,5) - how suddenly jumps. this pattern is unfit with song. decrease distance.
   after all similar patterns are same suggestion. you could de change must.
3. 01:20:342 (2) - Ctrl + G?
4. 01:21:225 (4) - same.
5. 01:39:203 (8,1) - be careful distance. do not recommend.

Mystyk wrote:

Hi! M4M!

[Normal]

• 
  
  As I told you in-game I think there is too much 1/2 and it would be better to simplify it a bit (and even by doing this it will still have plenty of 1/2 patterns imo).

1. 00:15:269 (2,4) - I think these are unnecessary because the song is still calm here and there is nothing much to emphasize so I would rather remove these, just like you did between these 00:18:137 (1,2) - Yeah, removed them.
2. 00:19:019 (2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - a lot of 1/2 after each other for a long time, it would be better to make it easier, example: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4196398 - http://puu.sh/m76vt/dfbc5c0a98.jpg Followed your first pic.
3. 00:23:210 (4) - remove this to have a small break after the 1/2 Ok, removed.
4. 00:34:681 (2) - remove this to make it easier and also because the background sounds aren't loud enough to be emphasized (at least not on Normal) - on the other hand you could also try this: I just removed the (2)
   00:34:901 (3) - maybe this would fit better to the rhythm - http://puu.sh/m76Eg/b5f6525ad6.jpg because it is weird to end (3) on the start of the vocals, it should be a circle or a slider start imo
5. 00:37:328 (4) - remove for a small break Removed.
6. 00:45:269 (2) - remove either this OR 00:46:151 (4) - but I think here there needs to be a small break because there is a lot of 1/2 or you can choose a different way as well - http://puu.sh/m76Qo/f75094d86b.jpg - because you end the slider at a bad place again, something should start there and not end, example: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4196469 I just removed (2)
7. 00:48:798 (2,3,4) - same ^ - example: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4196454 and move this up 00:51:225 (2) - Followed that rhythm in the pic.
8. 00:52:989 (2) - I don't really see a reason to keep this because the song is very calm and there aren't any vocals except from that weird little sound, but if this was removed it might emphasize the loud new start here 00:53:431 (1) - Removed that circle.
9. 00:54:092 (2,2) - remove these for a little break Ok
10. 01:03:137 (3) - you end the slider at a place where a slider should start or there should be a hit circle, example: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4196499 - http://puu.sh/m77j0/3e591ab3c4.jpg Nah, I'm gonna keep this.
11. 01:05:563 (4) - remove for a little break Ok
12. 01:11:739 (2,4) - similar to 00:15:269 (2,4) - I think it's unnecessary to emphasize because it is not that loud (ofc it fits the song but it just makes it harder) and there are no vocals either Removed those notes.
13. 01:17:034 (2,4) - same here, I can hear that it fits but it makes the pattern really long without any breaks so I think it's better to remove them Removed.
14. 01:19:681 (4) - remove this for a break and also because by removing it you can give a bigger emphasize to 01:19:901 (1) - Ok
15. 01:34:019 (1,2) - this kind of pattern is usually put on harder difficulties in my opinion, so simplifying it would be better - http://puu.sh/m77zV/45bd565388.jpg Followed your suggestion.
16. 01:43:504 (2) - remove for a break Ok
17. 01:45:269 (2) - same ^ Ok
18. 01:48:798 (2,4) - same as 01:17:034 (2,4) - so I would suggest removing them Ok
19. 01:49:901 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - too much 1/2 basically unnecessarily because as I said you should put this kind of 1/2 in harder difficulties only, example: http://puu.sh/m77Lj/b8593b271d.jpg OR http://puu.sh/m77PT/b423899e00.jpg Followed your first pic.

[Insane]

1. 00:34:681 (4,5) - I didn't really like the flow here while playing, it would feel better to play if (5) lead downwards instead of upwards, example: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4195926 Followed your suggestion.
2. 01:04:460 (2) - it would be better to click circles rather than a slider because of the vocals, the slider also follows the vocals but circles fit better, just like you did here 01:05:342 (4,5) - Nah, I prefer the slider
3. 01:06:225 (2) - same ^ ^
4. 01:15:931 (4) - same ^ but suggestion: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4195966 - I think this kind of jump would fit to vocals, since 01:16:372 (1) - here they are a big higher, I think it would be fun to play I like my current pattern more.
5. 01:22:328 (4,5) - same as the first suggestion, I think the flow could be improved here, example: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4195996 This one seems fine to me, but I'll wait for more opinions.

The other difficulties are nice the way they are in my opinion. Good luck!

VTC wrote:

yea M4M here.
i'll post on your queue after this.

• [Easy]

1. 00:09:313 (3) - maybe need NC here? No, that will cause inconsistencies.
2. 00:12:842 (3) - same. ^, I followed a specific NC pattern.
3. 00:51:666 (4) - make to more symmetry. Made a small change
4. 01:14:166 (5,1) - little blanket error. ^

• [Normal]

1. 00:14:166 (4,1) - swap NC No, my current NC pattern is better.
2. 00:16:372 (1) - remove NC Would cause inconsistencies and I want to keep my current pattern.
3. 00:17:695 (2,1) - swap NC
4. 00:21:225 (4,1) - same.
5. 00:23:431 (1) - remoe NC
6. 00:24:754 (2,1) - swap NC
7. 00:24:754 (2,1,3,1) - same.
8. 00:51:666 (1) - remove NC
9. 00:58:725 (1) - same.
10. 01:02:254 (1) - ^
11. 01:03:798 (4,1) - swap NC
    after all same beat and vocals swap & remove. i think much better NCs.
    Only NCs. map is fine! Sorry, no NC changes. My current NC's are more effective imo.

• 
  [Hard]
  i think, this diff need more symmetry.

1. 00:12:842 (1) - how about x : 208 y : 284? Ok, fixed.
2. 00:30:489 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this comboes are litle boring imo. you can change some pattern. i trust. If someone can give me a suggestion, I may consider it.
3. 01:17:695 (4,1) - more make same angle. Meh, looks fine to me.

• 
  [Insane]
  

1. 00:00:490 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - easier than hard? this patr needs more large distance imo. Nah, this is an Insane-mapping style.
2. 00:27:401 (2,3,4,5) - how suddenly jumps. this pattern is unfit with song. decrease distance. Small jumps like this is fine in an Insane. I have to lift the difficulty a bit. Otherwise it's a Hard.
   after all similar patterns are same suggestion. you could de change must.
3. 01:20:342 (2) - Ctrl + G? Nah, I want to keep my current pattern.
4. 01:21:225 (4) - same. ^
5. 01:39:203 (8,1) - be careful distance. do not recommend. Since (1) has such a strong sound, I want to emphasize it so no change.

that' all!

nice BG! Thanks~

MERRY CHRISTMAS! To you too

moph wrote:

m4m o/

[Easy]

1. 00:19:460 (2) - don't really like how 00:19:901 - is skipped to follow the vocals, sounds a little off to me. I recommend just doing what you've done before like a single then a 1/1 slider? Well, since this is an Easy, I don't want to make it too complicated so I'm rather going to keep my slider.
2. 00:52:989 (5) - I would leave this note out, would be cool to have a slight gap here. The note where you mapped it isn't that strong either, more of a gradual buildup. I agree. Removed that note.
3. 01:00:489 (1) - following off what you previously done shouldn't this be two 1/1 sliders instead? Additionally 01:02:254 (3,4) - this should be a 2/1 then a single? If consistency is what you're going for. I'm not really going for consistency here, so keep.
4. 01:39:313 (1,2) - I think this would be better as 2 1/1 sliders as It would follow the vocals and drums. 01:41:078 (3,4) - could be a 2/1 + single. The 2/1 slider would follow the held vocal note. I don't want too many of those sliders since it will make the Easy very difficult.
5. 01:42:842 (1,2) - same here really. I feel like using a 2/1 here would be sort of under mapping as this is the most intense part of the song. I did place 1/1 sliders at other places so I didn't really undermap.

[Normal]

1. 00:19:681 (3) - maybe delete this one. I think it would be nice to have a 1/1 gap there for the held vocals I already made a different change there.
2. 00:34:019 (1,2,3,4) - there should be more emphasis on the start of the new stanza here 00:35:784 -. Right now the rhythm here feels too similar between the two stanzas while they sound pretty different. Try this maybe, might help vary things up a bit. Meh, I don't really hear much of a difference so I'm rather gonna keep my current pattern. Don't want a too big inconsistency.
   
   example

   
3. 00:44:607 (1) - would be cool to have a 1/2 reverse slider here instead imo. Same here actually 00:48:137 (1) - instead of just 1/1s, might make things sound more interesting. I did place reverse sliders at other places, so I want to keep this slider as it is.
4. 00:52:989 (2) - same as in easy, a gap here would be nice. Yeah, already removed that.
5. 01:03:137 (3,4) - two 1/2s here would sound better here I think as it emphasizes the guitar. Mystyk warned me not to place too many of those since it's similar to a Hard and I agree with him.
6. 01:11:960 (3,3) - same with these two actually, you could change both or just 1 set. Just to add a little variation. Here too 01:17:254 (3) - ^
7. 01:27:622 - note here? or here 01:28:504 - so its the same as what you've done later, although I think the first is better. I can't overmap. I already had to remove many 1/2 rhythms.
8. 01:39:313 (1,2) - two 1/2s here would be cool, or even two later as well. Something like what you did here 01:42:842 (1,2,3,4) - I can't place too many of these.

[Hard]

1. 00:35:784 (1,2) - same with that i said earlier on, the music here in this stanza is relatively different to the stanza before but you've used the same rhythm in both. I think it would be nice if 00:35:784 (1,2) - and 00:37:548 (1,2) - were replaced with two 1/2 sliders. Or maybe apply that to the stanza before? I still don't really hear a difference, so I rather want to keep my current patterns.
2. 00:40:637 (4) - two singles instead like how you've done it before? There are vocals on the slider end which could be mapped. Ok, followed your suggestion.
3. 01:25:195 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - to me the rhythm here is a bit messy as it doesn't seems to follow anything properly (maybe its just me), but try this. I think it follows the music better In the pic you followed the same rhythm as I did, but just replaced the sliders/circles with either sliders or circles, so no change.
   
   example

   
4. 01:31:151 (4,5) - hmm try swapping these two around, don't like how the slider ends on 01:31:372 - which could use a lot more emphasis Nah, my current pattern is fine.

[Insane]

1. This diff is basically 1/2 throughout .__. I get that the song doesn't offer a lot but I reckon you should use some of the rhythms that were in Hard as they were pretty nice. Isn't the rhythms in Hard easier?
2. 00:07:548 (1,2) - this could easily be a 1/2 slider and it would fit pretty well imo. 00:09:313 (1,2) - same story here as well, etc applies to all the similar ones. It is a 1/2 slider, isn't it? I can't think of a different slider that I can use here.
3. 00:16:372 (1,2) - 1/2 here as well? Variety and fits imo. ^
4. 00:27:401 (2,3,4,5) - spacing here seems a little larger here o.o the music isn't that intense. It is larger cuz they are small jumps. I don't want to make the diff too easy so I added a few jumps to spice it up.
5. 00:34:019 (1,2,3,4) - i guess its more justified here but still too big imo, spacing like this would fit much later on. I don't know. The jumps are pretty small imo.
6. 00:37:989 (2,3) - consider changing this to a slider instead, I think it would sound better to differentiate this from the previous stanza. Nah, I rather want to keep my circles.
7. 00:43:725 (3,4) - these might be better as singles, there are vocals on the slider ends and due to that I think they should be different from the previous two sliders. Or better yet make 00:42:842 (1,2) - this into a 1/1 slider + single? I'm rather keeping my current pattern.
8. 01:04:460 (2) - two singles to follow the vocals? ^
9. 01:15:931 (4) - same ^
10. 01:46:372 (1,2) - to vary things up maybe a 1/1 + single? same here 01:48:137 (1,2) - ^

I'm a dick dick dick
Hope this was helpful, good luck

Karia wrote:

Hi //

• Easy

1. 00:28:504 - 00:42:622 - 00:42:842 - 00:46:151 - 00:46:372 - 00:49:681 - 00:49:901 - Delete these greenlines Whoops, deleted them all. Thanks for that~
2. fine

• Normal

1. 00:18:798 - How about adding a note here? Here has same sound as 00:15:269 - (Same as 00:25:857 - here) I can't place too many 1/2 rhythms. I already had to remove a lot of them.
2. 00:19:681 (3) - Delete? That is better for vocal and notes-spread imo I already made a different change there.
3. 01:48:798 (2) - Delete for consistency ^
4. 01:49:901 (1,2,3,4) - This rhythm looks really Hard diff.. ^

• Hard

1. 00:14:166 (4) - Change to two notes for vocal? This part is a bit boring cuz here is lots of 1/2 sliders. Ok, followed your suggestion.
2. 01:27:401 (2,3) - Change to a 1/2 slider for 01:27:842 (4,5) - these clap sounds? Nah, I rather want to keep the circles.
3. 01:30:931 (3,4) - Plz reverse the rhythm.. Note on 01:31:372 - here is better to play =3= I agree. Fixed.
4. 01:53:431 (1) - (102, 35) or somewhere that you want? Incresing DS is more funny Fine.

• Insane

1. 01:39:203 (8,1) - Well, I wonder this large DS is necessary in this diff.. It's not really large lol. I want to emphasize (1). But if this'll be a problem then I'll change it.
2. 01:50:342 (2) - Ctrl + g, 01:50:784 (3) - Crtl + g. That is better with vocal I like my current pattern more.
3. 01:53:431 (1) - Same as Hard. Give it more DS It's already far enough for me.

That's all, GL! :p