Oh hey M4M thing from your queue-
[]
[General]
Yeah that’s it; hope this helps
[]
[General]
- I’m not sure if it’s just me, but I think your offset might be a little off; try adjusting it by -20ms or something around that number, e.g. your red uninherited timing point should be at roughly 470
- 00:26:078 (3) – I noticed that 00:25:637 (2) – is a 49 degree rotation of 00:25:195 (1) –; the (3) stands out a little bit because it’s not the same rotation. Maybe move it to x42, y142 and then rotate it by 2 degrees counter-clockwise from its selection centre to create the same shape/distance here?
- following up from the above suggestion, maybe you can move 00:26:519 (4) – to x56, y305 so the distance between these notes is the same… You’re also probably going to want to fix the distance between 00:26:519 (4,5) – as well if you go with this suggestion
- 00:45:489 (4) – this blanket could be a little better in my opinion; it looks a little bit too curved, so maybe loosen the curve a bit? Remember to make 00:45:931 (5) – the same shape as well
- 00:47:254 (3,4) – I don’t think using the same shape here would be the best idea here; the (4) looks a little bit too curved as a result, so maybe just make the (4) a blanket?
- 01:28:284 (6) – Maybe flip the curve on this slider here so the flow is a little more circular?
- 00:15:489 (3) – similar to Hard, I noticed 00:15:048 (2) – is a 30 degree rotation of 00:14:607 (1) -; the (3) stands out a little bit because its placement is a little off from the pattern that you can create here. Maybe try moving it to x240, y226? Remember to fix 00:15:931 (4) – so that it blankets the (3) if you go with this suggestion
- 00:25:195 (1,2,3,4) – similar suggestion to the above suggestion; try moving the (3) to x353, y155 and the (4) to x425, y103
- 00:26:960 (1) – why not use the same slider shape as 00:26:519 (4) - ? It might look a little bit nicer visually, but that’s just my opinion; what you have also works
- 00:32:254 (1,2) – these two shapes are different from each other; maybe use the same shape?
- 01:06:666 (3) – similar to the first suggestion I gave you; maybe move this to x204, y202 to make this pattern more consistent
- 01:15:489 (4) – similar to the above; move to x359, y196
- 01:25:195 (1) – why the shift in snap distance for this burst here? Even if it’s to emphasize the finish on the downbeat, the larger distance might cause some frustrating combo breaks; maybe you should just stick to the same distance snap for this burst?
- 01:39:313 (1) – ^
Yeah that’s it; hope this helps