I'd consider this a win!

<3

Your Timing seems super off to me. I honestly think you only need 1 red line at the beginning but with adjusted BPM since this is definitely not a flat 160

An Offset of 0 sounds best to me but in that case you'll have to add maybe half a second of silence to your audio at the beginning because osu dislikes maps with zero offset. I then used a BPM of 160.18

TAGS! YAY!
add Girls' Last Tour in tags for english anime title
add ed as alternative keyword for ending
add japanese j-core jcore core electronic remix for language and genre

add remixed to tags so it shows up when searching for the "Machinarium Remixed" album title

I returned from the shadow realm for this

In the first section 00:04:796 - 00:13:646 I feel like you could slightly reduce some of the more spaced gaps. Having relatively high density of active rhythms I think is cool here, as well as the rather random spacing variation. It fits with the wonky sound the song starts out with but I do think it's just a little bit too much, when you compare it to other, more intense parts of the song, we're still in the very intro after all.

Following the intro, the section 00:16:796 - 00:40:796 has somewhat inconsistent spacings in the active circle parts.
For example, 00:16:796 (1,2,3,4), 00:16:796 (1,2,3,4) - feels wayyy to spaced. You don't even get to spacing like this in the second half of this section, despite the song arguably being more intense there.
But even with patterns like 00:28:796 (1,2,3,4,5) vs. 00:35:996 (1,2,3,4,5) which represent similar things in the song are so drastically different, one feeling overspaced, the other being underwhelming. 00:32:396 (1,2,3,4,5) - was what I felt like a good middleground.

btw, 00:25:196 (1,2,3,4,5) is fine with the lower spacing to make the slider feel more intense, although you could still at least slightly buff the spacing here as well.

Few missing barrel hitsounds:
03:34:496 (1) - 03:43:796 (2) (sliderend) - 03:45:446 (5) - 03:46:196 (2) (sliderend)

03:45:446 (5) - should then also be sampleset 2

Also, maybe generally lower the barrel hitsounds even more, could honestly go as low as 10% volume

I am having a few issues with the section from 00:15:710 - 00:27:004

• This part feels super dense, maybe break up the constant 1/1s at 00:21:004, having a 2/1 break there?

• I feel like the vocal at 00:18:180 deserves some more impact by being mapped actively (like 00:23:828 (4)) since it's arguably more impactful than 00:17:828 which is mapped actively. Maybe adjust your rhythm to something like this?
  

• 00:21:357 (1,3) - having these be the only 2/1 sliders in this section feels kinda out of place, especially since there's nothing different happening in the song or the vocals to justify having these longer held sliders here. If you want to simplify (which is often not a bad idea in Easy diffs) then I'd do it a bit more regularly and not so isolated because that feels odd

Nerf CS to 3, doesn't make any sense to have cs higher than the Hard diff and just slightly lower than the Insane, that's kinda silly for progression.

ctrl+g 00:51:004 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 00:53:828 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 00:56:651 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 00:59:475 (1,2,3,4) lol? Currently you put so much emphasis on the "night" when it's arguably the weakest vocal of the three words said.

What's up with your spacing in 00:04:416 - 00:09:004? Don't really see a reason why you use same distance for 1/4s and 1/2s
Honestly, just make 1/4s overlap like 00:09:710 (4,1)
Also, please fix your (visual) spacing on 00:08:210 (3,4) lol

Your spacing seems kinda inted in some places, most notably 00:15:710 - 00:25:239 and the first kiai.

for example 00:16:239 (2,3) or 00:20:828 (4,1) have an unreasonably large gap while patterns like 00:19:945 (1,2,3) could be highlighted so much more with how the vocals go up there.

For the kiai examples of emphasis that seems just wrong would be 00:19:945 (1,2,3) (why is the emphasis on the 3, when both 1&2 should arguably be more intense), 00:44:298 (2,3) (could go much crazier on the 3 here, vocals are peaking).

By no means a comprehensive list of the issues but just the most glaring examples that you can find at a glimpse. I'd recommend going over both sections again to check for these odd spacing choices where they don't properly represent what the song is doing

In 00:15:710 - 00:24:180 I feel like there's a lot of missed opportunities to focus on the e-piano a bit more to make the rhythm more interesting for example by mapping the blue tick between 00:16:416 (3,4), 00:17:828 (5,6), 00:19:239 (4,5) etc.

btw, I think it is fine to ignore it in places like 00:17:475 (3,4) in favour of focusing on the clearly thought out patterns follwing the vocals.