01:38:834 (1,2) - feels like this will be more epic if u overlap 2 on 1 to seperate it from the jump u usally used on drum
02:32:001 (4) - should be similar slider and overlapping on 02:31:334 (2) ? since new part start on 02:32:667 instead so would be great if u can still do the concept before new part start
00:03:603 (1,1) any reason for ncing both? I think its better to stay simplicity nc logic in this diff level
00:11:785 (1,2) 00:40:421 (1,2) - 00:44:512 (1,2) - can unnc?
00:05:307 (4) - 00:06:330 (4) - you can make this to circle to create gap. Reduced density here can help sectional contrast with 00:07:694
Since bpm of this set is 255 which exceeds 240, no 1/2 rhythm should be used on normal diff. So the current normal should be considered as advance/hard diff. You will need another normal diff with mainly 1/1 or 2/1 rhythm
00:22:567 (1,2,1,2) - you can buff spacing since now the movement and spacing just play too similar to 00:23:273 (2,3,1,2) -
01:38:834 (1,2) - feels like this will be more epic if u overlap 2 on 1 to seperate it from the jump u usally used on drum
02:32:001 (4) - should be similar slider and overlapping on 02:31:334 (2) ? since new part start on 02:32:667 instead so would be great if u can still do the concept before new part start
problem still exist even you changed bpm. Now the issue is having 1/4 rhythm in 127.5 bpm map which is still exceeds RC limit on normal diff density
Remove all 1/2 sliders and 1/2 gap on calm section.
For example for first four measures of verse 00:35:161 can be simplified to https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/998590897434394624/1349887339887071423/image.png?ex=67d4bc0d&is=67d36a8d&hm=a7df3a812f7d609137728a4d34137794384f2d0c9ea5462182f04e7c2599fb6f&
00:49:106 (2,3,4) - https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/998590897434394624/1349893879075307630/image.png?ex=67d4c224&is=67d370a4&hm=af2d3938b5a8ff44ac8c4fbf351837893f310020e7830c32ddd49576e87cd886&