1. Hard (3.09 stars, 181 notes)
2. Insane (3.84 stars, 258 notes)
3. Normal (1.92 stars, 127 notes)

1. 00:18:424 (3) - You can choose to replace this with a circle in order to put a triple here 00:18:601 - to fit better with the music
2. 00:20:895 (1,2) - and the rhythm here should technically be circle, triple, triple
3. 00:24:248 - This should be mapped the keep the map flowing. Normally a circle would be fine, but it might interfere with your following circle pattern.
   Maybe a better change is: 00:23:366 (2) - First move this closer to (5,1) to follow distance snapping. It'll make the pattern look a little bit neater. Then you can copy+paste 2 (!!), rotate it 180 degrees and stack it on 00:24:424 (1) - . It'll create a simple slider pair that revolves around (5)'s tail. Then simply create another slider between 2 and 3 at 00:24:072 -
   so like this

   
4. 00:41:895 - Note to keep the flow
5. 00:48:424 (2) - You should break this up into circle + slider, and consider a triple here 00:49:042 -
6. 00:54:072 (2) - Consider changing this to a 1/2 slider + circle, and adding a triple here 00:54:689 -
7. 01:19:483 (1,2) - kinda strange how you changed it to this. I think the rotation before was fine, but I guess this is ok too
   f

   

Frostings wrote:

Don't kudosu any of my posts

1. 00:18:424 (3) - You can choose to replace this with a circle in order to put a triple here 00:18:601 - to fit better with the music
2. 00:20:895 (1,2) - and the rhythm here should technically be circle, triple, triple
3. 00:24:248 - This should be mapped the keep the map flowing. Normally a circle would be fine, but it might interfere with your following circle pattern.
   Maybe a better change is: 00:23:366 (2) - First move this closer to (5,1) to follow distance snapping. It'll make the pattern look a little bit neater. Then you can copy+paste 2 (!!), rotate it 180 degrees and stack it on 00:24:424 (1) - . It'll create a simple slider pair that revolves around (5)'s tail. Then simply create another slider between 2 and 3 at 00:24:072 -
   so like this

   
4. 00:41:895 - Note to keep the flow
5. 00:48:424 (2) - You should break this up into circle + slider, and consider a triple here 00:49:042 -
6. 00:54:072 (2) - Consider changing this to a 1/2 slider + circle, and adding a triple here 00:54:689 -
7. 01:19:483 (1,2) - kinda strange how you changed it to this. I think the rotation before was fine, but I guess this is ok too
   f

   

1. 00:03:777 (2) - like this https://puu.sh/vHE90/8df56318ee.png

1. 00:05:719 (6,1) - This transition is really weak because (1) is near 45 degrees, the weakest kind of slider x( Closer to horizontal and maybe a slight flow change might help here. I also suggest grouping it with 00:06:777 (3) - to make it structured better https://puu.sh/vHGB6/b93803d088.png
2. 00:17:013 (1,2,3,4) - Here you could consider grouping 2 and 3 to make a better pattern
3. 00:20:366 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - Observe where the emphasis lies in the song. It's at 00:20:895 (4,7,3) - So in your mapping you should try to reflect this. (3) doesn't need the flow change that you mapped, but (4) and the (5,6,7) triple should. You can easily fix this by mapping something like this. If you make this change, you can also change 00:21:424 (1,2,3) - to fit better with this pattern by putting it snugly between (4) and (5,6,7) triple (and then adjusting the following 00:22:130 (4) - to fit with this new pattern)
4. 00:28:660 (1,2) - You should group these as well. Maybe alter the rhythm too (something like this? https://puu.sh/vHG1O/72c0de186b.png)
5. 00:32:542 (4,5,1) - (1) is very weak here because of lack of flow change and the jump on (4,5). One option is to ctrl+G this slider to improve the emphasis. Then you could setup a pattern like this on the following notes. You could instead Alter the flow on (1) to make a pattern like this
6. 00:39:248 (4,5) - The direction these guys go is very weak. Near 90 degrees (either vertical or horizontal) would make them feel stronger https://puu.sh/vHGcv/0452165453.png

Frostings wrote:

1. 00:03:777 (2) - like this https://puu.sh/vHE90/8df56318ee.png

i went back over and fixed xd
Ok starting from now, a lot of my suggestions might greatly alter the map. This is the real deal
I suggest you make a copy difficulty to make changes so you can revert back if necessary yep, insane b

For better design, you should be considering making more concrete patterns.
Make the objects work together instead of making them look randomly placed

I'll point out some patterns that could be designed better

1. 00:05:719 (6,1) - This transition is really weak because (1) is near 45 degrees, the weakest kind of slider x( Closer to horizontal and maybe a slight flow change might help here. I also suggest grouping it with 00:06:777 (3) - to make it structured better https://puu.sh/vHGB6/b93803d088.png done
2. 00:17:013 (1,2,3,4) - Here you could consider grouping 2 and 3 to make a better pattern made change but still kinda awkward, i'll think of something to replace soon
3. 00:20:366 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - Observe where the emphasis lies in the song. It's at 00:20:895 (4,7,3) - So in your mapping you should try to reflect this. (3) doesn't need the flow change that you mapped, but (4) and the (5,6,7) triple should. You can easily fix this by mapping something like this. If you make this change, you can also change 00:21:424 (1,2,3) - to fit better with this pattern by putting it snugly between (4) and (5,6,7) triple (and then adjusting the following 00:22:130 (4) - to fit with this new pattern) yee, i changed it up and readjusted 4 making it ended up looking like that
4. 00:28:660 (1,2) - You should group these as well. Maybe alter the rhythm too (something like this? https://puu.sh/vHG1O/72c0de186b.png) done, although i shifted these few notes over by a bit
5. 00:32:542 (4,5,1) - (1) is very weak here because of lack of flow change and the jump on (4,5). One option is to ctrl+G this slider to improve the emphasis. Then you could setup a pattern like this on the following notes. You could instead Alter the flow on (1) to make a pattern like this I went with making 1 horizontal (and remapped that bit. hopefully it looks fine), also changed rhythm a bit so there's no gaps anymore
6. 00:39:248 (4,5) - The direction these guys go is very weak. Near 90 degrees (either vertical or horizontal) would make them feel stronger https://puu.sh/vHGcv/0452165453.png done as well

We'll keep it at that for now

1. 00:03:248 (1,2) - 1, 2, 3 or whatever else you can come up with (:
2. 00:06:777 (3,1) - an example
   
   ---
   
   
3. 00:29:189 (2,1) - be careful of unintentional overlaps
4. 00:32:542 (4,5,1) - the spacing is a bit unnecessary pic
5. 00:38:542 (1,2,3,4,5) - Ok nevermind, maybe this looks a little strange .. maybe it's because they're all horizontal. 00:39:248 (4,5) - Perhaps if you make this vertical ... maybe like this if you can understand that picture (the green (2,3) and blue (4,5) don't change. Also blue 3 is rotated in this specific example to help with the flow from 1,2)

Frostings wrote:

You should look for every opportunity to group or relate sliders together. It will help with visuals and structure going to find some and (hopefully) make them better!

1. 00:03:248 (1,2) - 1, 2, 3 or whatever else you can come up with (: went with 2
2. 00:06:777 (3,1) - an example fixed
   
   ---
   
   
3. 00:29:189 (2,1) - be careful of unintentional overlaps moved 1, 2 over a bit
   
4. 00:32:542 (4,5,1) - the spacing is a bit unnecessary pic made smaller
5. 00:38:542 (1,2,3,4,5) - Ok nevermind, maybe this looks a little strange .. maybe it's because they're all horizontal. 00:39:248 (4,5) - Perhaps if you make this vertical ... maybe like this if you can understand that picture (the green (2,3) and blue (4,5) don't change. Also blue 3 is rotated in this specific example to help with the flow from 1,2) changed it to that, also remapped a few second afterwards because it looked extremely awkward

1. 00:03:248 (1,2) - I think it's important to have (2) directed slightly upwards. This probably sounds crazy, but I think it fits the music better. It'll also have liiiittle better progression to the next note, because right now the flow is too smooth creating an unwanted antijump effect. Also maybe consider slightly directing (1) upwards as well. I'd move them spatially apart too. Right now it looks a little bit constraining. Actually while I'm at it, I might also consider giving both sliders a slight bit more curvature to make them look a little stronger
   example incorporating all these things
   
   
2. 00:08:542 - This one is kind of a bigger change ... You could consider making this whole part more symmetric. The pattern will be really similar:
   
   1. 00:08:542 (2) - center this circle
   2. 00:09:424 (2,3) - center these, maybe at around 256|124
   3. 00:08:895 (1,2,3) - then copy these onto 00:10:307 - and rotate 180 degrees
   4. 00:11:719 (1,2,3) - and you can continue the centered pattern with these. maybe an idea
   5. 00:13:130 (1,2) - and then adjusting these accordingly
3. 00:15:954 (1) - Also a little bigger change, I would consider making this go upwards. It'll help greatly with the emphasis because of the huge flowbreak, if you're ok with a little increase in difficulty. example, here I altered pink (3) as well to make it look better with my new slider
   
   
4. 00:18:601 (1,2,3) - If you take the above suggestion, this slider should follow suit in emphasis with a flowbreak of its own. I would also swap the rhythm here 00:19:307 (4,5) - . You could structure it like this to make sure the transition from (5) to (1) still makes sense
   
   
5. 00:20:366 (2,3,4) - move (4) further away from (2) to maintain an equal distance between these three notes
6. 00:28:660 (1,2) - I would also have these slightly directed upwards https://puu.sh/vP3IK/7ff12133b9.png
7. 00:34:307 (1,2) - You could consider mapping these similarly as before to maintain style, example, keeping the level of curvature on the sliders consistent
8. 00:53:895 (3,1,2) - I think a better rhythm would be slider + circle + circle, or slider + slider, as the emphasis from vocals are on the red ticks
9. 00:56:895 (1) - This should be a 1/2 slider, and I would fill in the gaps here 00:57:777 - , maybe a circle + 1/2 slider starting from that timestamp
10. 01:05:366 (1,3) - You should really make these sliders the same as 01:05:719 (2,4) -
11. 01:12:424 (1,2,3,4,5) - The overlap on 4 looks kinda weird. Maybe like this, with 5 stacked on 3 (notice in this example I change the direction of 2 as well, it makes the structure a little more interesting
12. 01:25:130 (1) - just so you know, this is a bezier curve and not a standard 3-point circular slider. It happens when you add a fourth sliderpoint and then remove it. You should delete and remake this slider to make it a standard circular slider

Frostings wrote:

alright I'm just gonna point out everything. These are all super minor suggestions about stylistic changes. You don't need to follow these if you don't want to

1. 00:03:248 (1,2) - I think it's important to have (2) directed slightly upwards. This probably sounds crazy, but I think it fits the music better. It'll also have liiiittle better progression to the next note, because right now the flow is too smooth creating an unwanted antijump effect. Also maybe consider slightly directing (1) upwards as well. I'd move them spatially apart too. Right now it looks a little bit constraining. Actually while I'm at it, I might also consider giving both sliders a slight bit more curvature to make them look a little stronger
   example incorporating all these things
   
   
2. 00:08:542 - This one is kind of a bigger change ... You could consider making this whole part more symmetric. The pattern will be really similar:
   
   1. 00:08:542 (2) - center this circle
   2. 00:09:424 (2,3) - center these, maybe at around 256|124
   3. 00:08:895 (1,2,3) - then copy these onto 00:10:307 - and rotate 180 degrees
   4. 00:11:719 (1,2,3) - and you can continue the centered pattern with these. maybe an idea
   5. 00:13:130 (1,2) - and then adjusting these accordingly
3. 00:15:954 (1) - Also a little bigger change, I would consider making this go upwards. It'll help greatly with the emphasis because of the huge flowbreak, if you're ok with a little increase in difficulty. example, here I altered pink (3) as well to make it look better with my new slider
   
   
4. 00:18:601 (1,2,3) - If you take the above suggestion, this slider should follow suit in emphasis with a flowbreak of its own. I would also swap the rhythm here 00:19:307 (4,5) - . You could structure it like this to make sure the transition from (5) to (1) still makes sense
   
   
5. 00:20:366 (2,3,4) - move (4) further away from (2) to maintain an equal distance between these three notes
6. 00:28:660 (1,2) - I would also have these slightly directed upwards https://puu.sh/vP3IK/7ff12133b9.png
7. 00:34:307 (1,2) - You could consider mapping these similarly as before to maintain style, example, keeping the level of curvature on the sliders consistent
8. 00:53:895 (3,1,2) - I think a better rhythm would be slider + circle + circle, or slider + slider, as the emphasis from vocals are on the red ticks used slider+slider and made them symmetrical in the same direction
9. 00:56:895 (1) - This should be a 1/2 slider, and I would fill in the gaps here 00:57:777 - , maybe a circle + 1/2 slider starting from that timestamp
10. 01:05:366 (1,3) - You should really make these sliders the same as 01:05:719 (2,4) -
11. 01:12:424 (1,2,3,4,5) - The overlap on 4 looks kinda weird. Maybe like this, with 5 stacked on 3 (notice in this example I change the direction of 2 as well, it makes the structure a little more interesting
12. 01:25:130 (1) - just so you know, this is a bezier curve and not a standard 3-point circular slider. It happens when you add a fourth sliderpoint and then remove it. You should delete and remake this slider to make it a standard circular slider

1. 00:23:719 (4) - To create neater structure, this should tilt slightly into (3) instead of slightly out (ie rotate by -5 to -10 degrees). Same with the next (5) slider, it should be leaning slightly towards the (4) slider instead of away (you should rotate it the same amount as you did for (4))
2. 00:39:248 (4) - Conversely, this should be tilted slightly away from (5) (-5 degree rotation) and (5) should go from outwards to inwards (also -5 degree rotation)

Frostings wrote:

Final touch ups

1. 00:23:719 (4) - To create neater structure, this should tilt slightly into (3) instead of slightly out (ie rotate by -5 to -10 degrees). Same with the next (5) slider, it should be leaning slightly towards the (4) slider instead of away (you should rotate it the same amount as you did for (4))
2. 00:39:248 (4) - Conversely, this should be tilted slightly away from (5) (-5 degree rotation) and (5) should go from outwards to inwards (also -5 degree rotation)

1. You should look to DS wherever possible to help with reading and neatness:
   
   1. 00:15:601 (1,2) - You should move these further away
   2. 00:27:248 (1,2,3,4) - Make sure these are spaced out the same amount visually
   3. 00:31:307 (1) - Same with this slider with the previous 3 sliders.
   4. 00:33:777 (2,3,1) - and so on. You should go through the map and adjust wherever you can
2. 00:05:013 (2) - perhaps it's better to split this into 1/2 + 1/1. It'll emphasize the piano a bit better. Feel free to move around the previous (1) slider to make your patterning if you make this change
3. 00:17:366 (1,2) - A better rhythm might be circle + 1/1, to get two active hits on the drum and to make it more dense and thus smoother
4. 00:24:424 (1,2,1,2) - This is probably too hard. Maybe uh you could try something like this or some other pattern (the example is 30 degree rotations by the way)
5. 00:52:660 (1,2) - watch the distance. Maybe try something like this (note I change the red (1) slider as well just for different flow)

1. 00:11:719 (1,2) - You should merge these into a single 3/2 reverse slider. It'll sound smoother hitting the note on the red tick
2. 00:17:013 (4,1) - You should also merge these into a 3/2 slider. Making the strong note a slider is better for emphasis + you don't need to emphasize the sound at 00:17:366 - as much
3. 00:19:836 (2) - This would also work better as a slider. This time though, you should only make it 1/1 and leave the note at 00:20:366 (1) -. It'll feel good for variety
4. 00:22:660 (2) - Also consider extending this to a 1/1 slider
5. 00:28:307 (2) - I think it's better to move this 1/2 earlier. Also maybe consider making it into a 1/1 slider
6. 00:30:072 (1,2,3,1) - hmm.. rhythm could get needlessly complicated here. Might be better to cut our losses by mapping the entire piano with a single slider https://puu.sh/wc52H/ae4d6a156c.png (and starting the following blue slider 1/2 later)
7. 00:35:719 (1,2) - better to merge as 3/2 reverse

1. 01:28:130 (1,2) - might be better to delete the circle, move the slider back 1/2 and make it a reverse. Maybe that's easier to play? I'm actually not sure
2. 00:25:483 (1) - Drop NC. It's unnecessary
3. 00:37:130 (1,2,1) - Swap these three NCs. It's better to not have NC on lead-outs and a NC on a lead-in
4. 00:55:307 (3,1) - Swap these. It's better to not NC on stack

1. 00:55:130 (4,1,2,3) -
2. 01:05:366 (1,2,3,4,1) -

1. 00:08:895 (1,1) -
2. 00:27:248 (1,2,3,4) -

1. 00:10:307 (1) - I think you can drop NC here to make the symmetry stand out more
2. 00:25:483 (1) - drop NC for better pattern recognition
3. 00:37:130 (1,2,1) - you should toggle these three NCs for the same reason as Normal (stack and lead-in)
4. 00:59:013 (1) - Drop NC
5. 01:02:542 (5,1) - Swap NC for downbeat

Frostings wrote:

Don't forget to add hitsounds to your diffs just copied from hs diff

[Normal]
AR -> 5. It'll fit better with the dense patterns you have
Just a heads up: I'm really sorry and should've seen this coming, but the SV you use on the chorus is a little on the fast side. It IS fine the way it is now, and would probably be a hassle to change it. It's not that big of a deal, but I'm just letting you know, since you might get comments about it. Usually for choruses in lower diffs especially I use the same SV but make the rhythm or patterns harder i can always go back and change it if its for the better, i dont mind

1. 01:28:130 (1,2) - might be better to delete the circle, move the slider back 1/2 and make it a reverse. Maybe that's easier to play? I'm actually not sure i think it is easier
2. 00:25:483 (1) - Drop NC. It's unnecessary
3. 00:37:130 (1,2,1) - Swap these three NCs. It's better to not have NC on lead-outs and a NC on a lead-in
4. 00:55:307 (3,1) - Swap these. It's better to not NC on stack

[Hard]
Visual Distance
You should look to maintain equal visual distance between your objects to make your map appear cleaner overall. I'm just gonna mention the major ones. The others aren't really that important

1. 00:55:130 (4,1,2,3) -
2. 01:05:366 (1,2,3,4,1) - i made changes to both, hopefully good

Slider curvature
Slider curvature is good to structure your patterns. But after a certain curvature threshold, your sliders begin to create their own structure, rather than working together with other sliders i.e. too curvy = draw too much attention to themselves. You should look to decrease the curvature of the following sliders for these reasons:

1. 00:08:895 (1,1) -
2. 00:27:248 (1,2,3,4) -

---

1. 00:10:307 (1) - I think you can drop NC here to make the symmetry stand out more
2. 00:25:483 (1) - drop NC for better pattern recognition
3. 00:37:130 (1,2,1) - you should toggle these three NCs for the same reason as Normal (stack and lead-in)
4. 00:59:013 (1) - Drop NC
5. 01:02:542 (5,1) - Swap NC for downbeat

Shogud wrote:

Hell yea i love monogatari
From my modding queue:

TL;DR Overall just watch out for inconsistent spacing and slidershapes
but probably read the mod anyway


Normal

00:27:248 (1,2) - The spacing is very small for such a large gap in the music adjusted a bit
00:28:660 (1,2,1) - ^
00:41:189 (3,1) - These should probably be stacked like you did with 00:38:366 (1,2) these 1/2s overlap, so i didnt stack them. 00:38:366 (1,2) was different
00:48:248 (3,1) - ^
00:49:660 (3,1) - ^
Just in general watch out for overlaps since they are hard to read for new players
00:41:366 (1,2,1) - You were following the drum beat but then switched to vocals, I'd stay to the drum since the vocals are very wierd to play for any noobies i'll change what i can
01:21:601 (4,5,1) - Spacing is inconsistent here its not, because of the sv change on 1

Hard

00:36:954 (3,4) - You follow the vocals here but then ignore them in the next bar
00:36:954 (3,4) - They are also very close to the previous slider for such a long gap
00:45:424 (4) - This should probaly be blanketed with 00:45:601 (1), which would also fix the inconsistent spacing there blanket would destroy the structure of 00:45:424 (4,1,2) -
00:58:836 (2) - ^ but with 00:59:013 (3)
01:00:072 (2) - This should probably be farther away from the last note since it looks like a 1/4 gap instead of a 1/2 gap it doesnt
01:16:659 (1,2) - Feels wierd that there's nothing in between here since both the violin and the vocals are doing stuff for intensity control
01:27:601 (4,1) - Not sure why it has the same spacing as 01:27:248 (3,4), i'd put them closer together its fine

Insane

00:09:424 (2,3) - These should probably be blanketed with 00:08:895 (1) no thank you
00:10:836 (2,3) - ^
Slider shapes are inconsistent, probably copy + paste to make ones in the same section look the same, then just rotate and flip
00:22:130 (4) - Not sure what this is following since its just another drawn out chord like 00:21:601 (3) its following the drum sound
00:24:424 (1) - These jumps feel very haphazardly placed, I'd copy paste the first 3 then rotate them each one gets bigger because it grows more intense
00:31:307 (1) - This probably shouldn't be drawn out so long, since both the piano and the vocals are doing stuff in the middle of it starts on 'wo,' ends on 'hai'
00:37:130 (1) - ^ but this time its just the vocals doing sutff, i'd cahnge it to something like you have here 00:37:660 (2)
00:57:954 (4,1,1,1,1) - The intensity is increasing here but the spacing stays the same but the sv is increasing
01:28:307 (1,1,1) - ^ the sliders probably shouldnt decrease when the intensity increases its drawing a conclusion to the start of kiai's increase

Thank you for letting me listen to some awesome monogatari music while modding <3
GL!

Einja wrote:

dang frostings modded your map so hard that i couldn't find much to point out xd xd
[general]
i think it would be alright if you would have "bakemonogatari" in the tags, since this is related to that anime. sure

don't forget about combo colours! c:



[insane]
00:13:130 (1,2,5) - ugly overlap ;w; its unnoticeable when playing, but i will change it if it gets mentioned again

00:15:601 (3) - won't it be better for this to be a 1/4 stream to increase emphasis on the violin? i think this is fine

00:22:130 (4) - ^ (but you're emphasizing drums here, so it would be much more important for this to be a 1/4 stream) the map will only have one stream if i added one

00:24:424 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - try not to let your jumps overlap too much (unless the overlap is perfect), a cluster like this 00:24:601 (2,2,1,1) - would be easily fixed by just spacing them away from each other. the jumps play fine for me

00:26:542 (1,2) - it's okay to use 1/4 sliders here though, the violin is going down in scale as it adds emphasis onto 00:27:248 (1) - upon being clicked. theres a repeated sound D:

00:58:307 (1,1,1,1) - why are there NC's? nothing has changed, and you could use use 1/2 circle jumps instead since it adds buildup for the kiai part. theres no need for these jumps

01:28:307 (1,1,1) - ^ (it would greatly emphasize the ending since the ending is a strong beat itself.)

[normal]
you never change SV (slider velocity) in normal, it just isn't right. usually, yeah. but i'll remap if its necessary

your ds has to be consistent, just because it doesn't show up in aimod doesn't mean all ds is perfect. this for example 00:08:189 (2,1) - has 0.88 ds between it while the rest of the notes have 1.0 here are a few ds issues i pointed out (either too far or too close) fixing them

00:20:366 (2,3) - 0.94 ds

00:27:248 (1,2) - 1.15 ds

00:28:130 (2,1) - 0.91 ds

00:38:366 (1,2) - not sure about this one, because stacks aren't recommended in lower diffs. also the fact it's tapping 1/2 doesn't feel right, but i see a lot of other normal diffs do this, so it's up to you if you want to change it. its okay if not abused

00:38:542 (2,3) - 0.87

00:42:777 (1,2) - 0.89
00:43:307 (2,1) - ^

00:48:248 (3,1) - 1.08

00:57:601 (2) - ds issue between prev and next note


and a ton of other ds issues.


that's all from me now, good luck thank you for the mod

osuskrub wrote:

monogatari <3

[General]

add a few more tags like "light novel" and "ed" so that your map could be more accessible for searching. yee

combo colors !

[Normal]

00:11:366 (2,1) - visually it would be nicer if 2 is tilted a bit more downwards to have a better looking entry into 1 done

00:27:248 (1) - this slider alone looks fairly empty in rhythm, personally it would be better to make it 1/1 with a note on 00:27:777 - i think its fine

00:37:130 (2) - this note doesn't seem to be mapped to any sound. care to explain? removing the note would make it feel very awkward, it plays more naturally with a note

00:39:248 (3) - ctrl + j would make the patterning look nicer sure

00:43:307 (2) - don't see the need for a sharper slider while the song is in a fairly calm state, making it a smooth curve would fit better yeah

00:59:719 (1) - a drum sampleset fits a lot better on the head of this slider, normal sampleset sounds very off yes, also added a finish

01:05:366 (1,2,3,4) - usually for a normal diff you shouldn't have this many consecutive circles. i understand that you are emphasizing the vocals, though the max circles i would put for these gaps is 3. for the vocals, yeah

01:06:777 (1,2,3) - this could be cleaned up a bit, the angle from 2,3 looks a bit eh distance snap

01:21:601 (4) - moving this a bit upwards would make the exit from the slider a bit cleaner up by a bit


[Hard]

00:04:660 (1,2,3) - how come 1 is tilted to the left while 2,3 are to the right? should they all be the same? for visual, it looks better

00:18:777 (1,2) - align these 2 more like this, https://puu.sh/wlpXf/de3dd5807c.jpg having them like this emphasize the "dun" sound better

01:08:719 (2,3) - the distance between these objects is unecessarily high, also i think ctrl + g the rhythm would be better i did smth with it

there's not much for me to say on this diff! good job! thank you owo

[Insane]

00:39:866 - missing a note here adding one here means adding some in other places as well, i like the way it is now

00:49:836 (3) - instead of making this just a circle make it a 1/2 slider having a little pause here plays nicely, making it into a 1/2 would also mean destroying the triangle ;w;

00:58:307 (1,1,1,1) - why is the last 1 different than the others? wouldn't it be cool to have them the same direction? sure why not

01:05:366 (1,2,3,4) - emphasize the vocals in 2,3,4 by not making them the same as 1 its fine

01:11:366 (2,3,4) - switch the arrangement of these sliders im not sure what you mean, but i removed the 1/4s and did some change


that's all I have to say! good job and good luck on this mapset! thank you so much !!

MujouSekai wrote:

NM from queue
sorry for modding only insane
Insane

00:13:130 (1,2,5) - overlap xd yeah fixed
00:15:601 (3) - stacked stream would be better imo stated previously, i won't have a stream
00:16:483 (2) - plz follow flow of sliders not sure what you mean by flow, as it can go a lot of ways; 1 is different because of the heavy drum sound, it serves as a flowbreak while 2 & 3 are just regular
00:18:248 (4) - here actually two notes would work much better, the violin is so strong to be ignored its not ignored, 4 is slider because the ending decreases in volume for the next heavy sound at 00:18:777 -
00:21:601 (3,4) - follow flow awkward to play
00:26:013 (1,2,3) - for this one, you have different angles for the previous ▲, why at the end u kept the same, and i think increasing spacing for each ▲ would work better. spacing is increasing, all 4 are rotating
00:26:895 (2) - move closer https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8361912 did by a bit, but not that much
00:28:130 (3,3) - plz generalize where u use sliders where u use notes. like for the first one, its vocals. then the second one is piano notes. they are both following the music, there wasnt a reason for me to just put circle in for something without a big difference in intensity
00:34:836 (2) - lower spacing- calm section. its fine
00:36:248 (2,3,4,5) - i dont get this. it follows the vocal, and the two piano on 2 4
00:37:130 (1,2) - blanket sorry, i dont see a point in blanketing
00:40:836 (5,6) - blanket lel no thanks
00:53:895 (1,2) - this is ugly, plz follow flow its flowing upwards
00:54:954 (6) - why a slider here? light drum if you listen carefully
01:28:307 (1,1,1) - perfect opportunity to bum up the pee pee haha just joking.


good luck! good song thank you

1. 00:00:425 (1,1) - Normal难度中，转盘后需要两条白线才能跟物件.所以这里是unrankable的。考虑一下缩短转盘吧
2. Normal难度建议两条大白线一次NC，这样可以避免现在开头全是1212121212的单调。同时两条大白线1NC的情况下会有更多的引导线，这对新手是一个帮助。
3. 00:15:954 (2,3) - 稍微有些不舒服，因为00:16:660 (3) - 没跟住前一个滑条的走向导致光标在这里突然转折...嘛只是看起来不大美观而已
4. 01:05:366 (1,2,3,4,1) - 不建议出现连续3个或以上的圈，Normal的玩家打这种会十分困难的...
5. 整个排版有些挤， https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8377680 左下角甚至完全没有用到，均匀填满整个区域会更舒服的

1. 排版与normal有共同问题。
2. ...节奏抓的有点问题，类似00:18:777 (1,2,3) - 这里抓的节奏比Normal都少。
   其次，hard难度是应该适当抓三连的，00:21:072 - 这种明显的鼓就要用三连或者1/4滑条了，后面那个1/3倒是可以一个滑条带过去
   00:27:072 - 这种明显的音没有漏的理由呀...
   主要都是整体上的问题。

1. 排版问题。
2. 00:15:601 (3,1) - 尾巴与滑条头离太远了，会导致拉断滑条或者出100的，这种在4星I标应该尽量避免
3. 00:40:130 (2,3) - 间距过大...和这一段的ds风格不搭配
4. 00:36:248 (2,3,4,5) - 两个叠 但是一个1/1 一个1/2...会读错的...
5. 01:14:366 - 这里这个三连很清楚，不能漏掉
6. 01:28:307 (1,1,1) - 我感觉这个绿线刚好反了..应该是越来越快的才对吧...
7. 主要还是排版..多看一些rank图找一下感觉吧

[Crz]Sword wrote:

from q
[Normal]

1. 00:00:425 (1,1) - Normal难度中，转盘后需要两条白线才能跟物件.所以这里是unrankable的。考虑一下缩短转盘吧 是个建议，还是rankable的
2. Normal难度建议两条大白线一次NC，这样可以避免现在开头全是1212121212的单调。同时两条大白线1NC的情况下会有更多的引导线，这对新手是一个帮助。好的
3. 00:15:954 (2,3) - 稍微有些不舒服，因为00:16:660 (3) - 没跟住前一个滑条的走向导致光标在这里突然转折...嘛只是看起来不大美观而已 应该可以吧
4. 01:05:366 (1,2,3,4,1) - 不建议出现连续3个或以上的圈，Normal的玩家打这种会十分困难的... 图里有1/2滑条比3个圈都难，这个应该算ok吧
5. 整个排版有些挤， https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8377680 左下角甚至完全没有用到，均匀填满整个区域会更舒服的 我觉的现在的ok

[Hard]

1. 排版与normal有共同问题。
2. ...节奏抓的有点问题，类似00:18:777 (1,2,3) - 这里抓的节奏比Normal都少。两个图抓的都有不同的perspective，normal这里比hard也难不了太多
   其次，hard难度是应该适当抓三连的，00:21:072 - 这种明显的鼓就要用三连或者1/4滑条了，后面那个1/3倒是可以一个滑条带过去
   00:27:072 - 这种明显的音没有漏的理由呀... 00:27:072 -加了一个圈，三连留给insane
   主要都是整体上的问题。

[Insane]

1. 排版问题。
2. 00:15:601 (3,1) - 尾巴与滑条头离太远了，会导致拉断滑条或者出100的，这种在4星I标应该尽量避免 slider leniency 打的ok
3. 00:40:130 (2,3) - 间距过大...和这一段的ds风格不搭配 visual distance看起来平衡，我不想打破
4. 00:36:248 (2,3,4,5) - 两个叠 但是一个1/1 一个1/2...会读错的... 换了个滑条
5. 01:14:366 - 这里这个三连很清楚，不能漏掉 会打乱“flow”的，kiai是比normal sections更顺
6. 01:28:307 (1,1,1) - 我感觉这个绿线刚好反了..应该是越来越快的才对吧... 结尾慢是应为kiai开始的快，然后再慢下来到远点
7. 主要还是排版..多看一些rank图找一下感觉吧

GL for RANK~ 谢谢啦~

Saika- wrote:

hi mod from my queue

Insane

00:04:660 (1,2,3) - i would allign this up in a straight line, with follow point on, it looks weird
00:22:130 (4) - a whole beat of buzz slider isnt usually used and theres no sound supporting it so i suggest changing this to a beat slider
00:24:424 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - i would copy+paste from one of these and rotate it by 20degree instead of this randomly placed hitnotes
00:31:660 - you skipped a sound here
00:39:866 - could have been a note here (hi hat sound)
00:42:689 - ^
00:45:513 - ^
00:58:307 (1,1,1,1) - why dont you just copy+paste this and scale it up?
00:59:719 (1) - this should be emphasized more
01:01:130 - ^
01:06:689 - a note here?
01:28:307 (1,1,1,1) - why dont you just copy+paste this and scale it down?

Good Luck

-Alcaida wrote:

Hello!
M4M from my queue
Sorry for my bad english
[Insane]
Move the spinner 00:00:425 (1) - to 00:00:513 - It starts here alrighty
Maybe place the slider 00:03:777 (2) - here 00:03:954 - and end at 00:04:307 - the current slider carries a sound id like not to miss
00:07:483 (1) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8392585 (for best flow) but i like it D:
Pit notes 00:03:777 - and 00:04:483 - i dont understand, sorry
00:15:424 (2) - nc its fine
plz place it in different palces 00:58:307 (1,1,1,1) - i like the way its gradually growing next to each other
01:28:307 (1,1,1) - ^
flow maybe? 00:21:601 (3,4) - flow in which way?
01:07:307 (2,3) - ds?? did some changes
[Hard]
00:00:513 - place spinner here yeah
00:18:601 - note? its p fine
00:37:130 (4) - place it here 00:36:777 - no thank you
slider?? 00:38:013 - 00:38:189 - there not really a major sound i can make slider to
00:43:130 - note ill add this in but may remove it later zz

Sorry for short mod thank you!
Good luck!

Saika- wrote:

Saika- wrote:

hi mod from my queue

Insane

00:04:660 (1,2,3) - i would allign this up in a straight line, with follow point on, it looks weird did smth
00:22:130 (4) - a whole beat of buzz slider isnt usually used and theres no sound supporting it so i suggest changing this to a beat slider made changes
00:24:424 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - i would copy+paste from one of these and rotate it by 20degree instead of this randomly placed hitnotes ill look into it
00:31:660 - you skipped a sound here was missed on purpose, for it to not play awkward; was going by piano
00:39:866 - could have been a note here (hi hat sound) it would make triple like notes, ill leave it as it is
00:42:689 - ^
00:45:513 - ^
00:58:307 (1,1,1,1) - why dont you just copy+paste this and scale it up? looks okay to me
00:59:719 (1) - this should be emphasized more how so?
01:01:130 - ^ sound starts here, emphasized by slider head
01:06:689 - a note here? no thanks
01:28:307 (1,1,1,1) - why dont you just copy+paste this and scale it down? same as above

Good Luck thanks for the mod!

1. NM不要太多SV變速，最好是一兩個就好，看要不要重做一些段落
2. 00:13:130 (2) - 這滑條太彎了在NM不易讀
3. 00:16:660 (3) - 00:18:777 (1) - 00:21:601 (1) - 00:24:424 (1) - 這幾個是同樣的音但是你擺放的卻不一樣
4. 00:27:248 (1) - 這邊都是彎起來的滑條再繞圈圈，要不要試著改變路徑或是把一些滑條改成直的，這樣玩起來比較有新鮮感
5. 00:37:130 (2) - 這邊換成轉盤?
6. 01:18:072 (1) - 太彎了
7. 01:26:542 (2) - ^
8. 01:28:130 (1) - 要不要跟01:29:013 (3) - 一樣直

1. 00:26:013 (4,5,6) - 這邊有些地方改成1/2小跳吧，這樣能對音，又有Hard的感覺
2. 00:48:954 (2,3) - 放成連打?
3. 00:58:307 (1,2,3,4,1) - 也是多放一點1/2小跳
4. 01:11:366 (3,4) - 放個連打
5. 01:12:072 (6) - 改成1/4 kick slider?
6. 01:14:895 (4,5,1) - follow 怪怪的，而且DS不同

1. 00:15:601 (3,1) - 這只有1/4間距而已太遠了
2. 00:24:424 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - 擺得太亂了，而且每個三角形的DS差太多
3. 00:26:895 (2) - 改成兩個短滑條比較合音
4. 00:44:189 (1) - 這邊吉他音不太適合這種1/1滑條，音樂聽起來很急促，但物件卻慢慢來的感覺
5. 00:45:601 (1) - ^

SakuraKaminari wrote:

From my Q! Remember to close Q next time or count down number of slots on your post.
I really can't find anything wrong, so I'm gonna talk about what you did right and why it's so successful with a couple things I did spot. Don't wanna come off as lazy!

Insane
This one has some problems.

00:05:542 (5,6) - all the notes are the same light piano, so why does this one have both distance and slider emphasis? Just because it's last doesn't seem like a good justification. it has vocal on it as well, thats why
00:19:836 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - These jumps are forced. None of these beats are accentuated enough to justify the difference between 2,3 and 3,4 1 has a heavy sound (with what every the heck that instrument is xd), the sound repeats on 2, and 3 follows with a light one as well; the drum kicks in on 4, you can hear the triplet sound lightly playing on 5 6 and 7, done in a triangle to transition and for visuals
00:24:424 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - This is done perfectly. Love how you highlight the spiral upwards in the music by a spinning triangle jump that scales with the pitch increase.
00:49:483 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4,5) - This rhythm change is so smooth it could get me into bed LOL
00:58:307 (1,1,1,1) - Love the slider stream and combo bringing out the start of kiai.
01:28:307 (1,1,1) - this structure is just so cool having it dilate down to end the song

Great map! Imo basically ready for rank! thank you

Hey lululu wrote:

遲來的M4M

Normal

1. NM不要太多SV變速，最好是一兩個就好，看要不要重做一些段落 我考虑一下
2. 00:13:130 (2) - 這滑條太彎了在NM不易讀 稍改了
3. 00:16:660 (3) - 00:18:777 (1) - 00:21:601 (1) - 00:24:424 (1) - 這幾個是同樣的音但是你擺放的卻不一樣 不同更好玩
4. 00:27:248 (1) - 這邊都是彎起來的滑條再繞圈圈，要不要試著改變路徑或是把一些滑條改成直的，這樣玩起來比較有新鮮感 最后俩改了
   
5. 00:37:130 (2) - 這邊換成轉盤? 我喜欢现在的
6. 01:18:072 (1) - 太彎了 稍改了
7. 01:26:542 (2) - ^
8. 01:28:130 (1) - 要不要跟01:29:013 (3) - 一樣直 01:26:542 (2) - 的尾巴和DS D：

Hard

1. 00:26:013 (4,5,6) - 這邊有些地方改成1/2小跳吧，這樣能對音，又有Hard的感覺 想要和00:24:424 (1,2,3,4,5) - 都一样
2. 00:48:954 (2,3) - 放成連打? 呃
3. 00:58:307 (1,2,3,4,1) - 也是多放一點1/2小跳 我不太喜欢小跳，感觉跟这个hard不条和 x.x
4. 01:11:366 (3,4) - 放個連打 symmetry
5. 01:12:072 (6) - 改成1/4 kick slider? 会跟01:11:366 (3,1) -不对称，我想一想吧
6. 01:14:895 (4,5,1) - follow 怪怪的，而且DS不同 稍改了

Insane

1. 00:15:601 (3,1) - 這只有1/4間距而已太遠了 mentioned in previous mod
2. 00:24:424 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - 擺得太亂了，而且每個三角形的DS差太多 大多数的人都将了，我再看看
3. 00:26:895 (2) - 改成兩個短滑條比較合音 小提琴；-；
4. 00:44:189 (1) - 這邊吉他音不太適合這種1/1滑條，音樂聽起來很急促，但物件卻慢慢來的感覺 这一段比较慢嘛(the rhythm & sliders, not music)
5. 00:45:601 (1) - ^

谢谢！！

osuskrub wrote:

get a bn

osuskrub wrote:

get a bn

Jennglebells wrote:

i wish i can find one D:

SakuraKaminari wrote:

osuskrub wrote:

get a bn

Jennglebells wrote:

i wish i can find one D:

i will help you find one. lemme ask some people.

EDIT: if I find you an M4M is that also ok

probably needs shit ton more mods On this but thank you anyways

1. 00:04:660 (3,4) - I think these would look better facing away from each other maybe?
2. 01:28:130 (1,2,3) - why didn't you keep the pattern from before? https://puu.sh/wsFPC/2a2c72cb75.png

1. 00:20:895 (3,1) - Probably better style to have less curvature on these https://puu.sh/wsFVd/99b321efbd.png
2. 00:27:248 (1,2,3) - You should try to maintain visual distance on all three here https://puu.sh/wsG0C/4046128289.png
3. 01:05:366 (1,2,3,4) - I know I mention it often but yeah less curvature. It's not really good for structure to curve them so much https://puu.sh/wsG80/7970fc770a.png
4. 01:23:189 (2) - Same thing

1. 00:22:130 (4,5) - I wouldn't stack these as the emphasis becomes lost on 5: https://puu.sh/wsGcL/0e456c90e0.png
2. 00:41:366 (1) - Curvature
3. 00:43:307 (2,3) - honestly... I would just press ctrl+J. Staggering the sliders is perhaps better than keeping them in line.
4. 00:46:660 (3) - Maybe similar thing here https://puu.sh/wsGn0/ce67ffe40c.png
5. 01:03:954 (3,4,5) - looks a bit weird. I was thinking maybe you could map it like this https://puu.sh/wsH0L/46275e1a2d.png , but perhaps that doesn't really fit the style. Maybe a bigger change like this might work https://puu.sh/wsGX7/1553d8ed5a.png . For the second suggestion the overlap with the next notes shouldn't be a big issue
6. 01:13:130 (3,4,5) - You should space these out because they're a bit weak. Stacking on 01:12:072 (6) - isn't as important as the emphasis gained. https://puu.sh/wsHbs/46f318308f.png

aigoh wrote:

Hey! For M4M. Great map, and I can tell you've put in a lot of thoughts into it :'D thank you ;w;
Overall, the main things that can improve are volume, hitsound, and spacing changes (DS). I think you need to find a custom hitclap and hitwhistle. The standard ones you use give not enough feedback. So..steal from someone!! /me runs maybe next time, ill stick with defaults for now (:

Mod

• [Hitsound]
  This applies to all difficulties

1. 00:01:483 - From this point, the vocals get louder...try adding green lines with gradual volume increase:
   30% at 00:01:483 -
   35% at 00:02:189 -
   40% at 00:02:895 - spinner volume increase doesnt really affect things that much
2. 00:03:248 - From here, I could barely hear anything. Try 45%. You could also add more whistles wherever the piano is strong, like 00:05:189 (3) - 00:05:719 -
3. 00:03:248 - hitfinish?
4. 00:15:601 - hitclap? (with a good custom hitsounding) will add drumb clap
   
5. 00:27:248 - 00:38:366 - weak volume here too. Anything below 40% sounds weak
   
   [Normal]
   Base SV of 1.4 is too fast. 1.1 or 1.2 is better changed to 1.3
   SV change is not recommended in Easy/Normal, as newbies are not used to these yet. They think same gap in rhythm = same DS. Try using 1.00x religiously
   
   00:08:807 - to 00:12:866 - flow seems weird and could get some improvement intended since vocals have little pauses
6. 00:04:660 (3,4) - arrange like this?
7. 00:08:895 (1,2,3) - arrange like this? made changes
8. 00:11:366 (4,1) - arrange like this? trying to not blanket anything, sorry ><
   
9. 00:29:542 (4) - Change to straight slider? It doesn't look good. sure
10. 00:38:366 (1) - 00:55:307 (1) - unstack to be consistent with other 1/2 parts you mapped to 00:38:366 (1) - was stacked for readability, i'll change 00:55:307 (1) - if it gets mentioned again
11. 00:41:189 (6,1) - feels cramped, so I would spread these out a bit more https://puu.sh/wtyoX.png because of ds i cant really get creative with this, after changing base sv its even harder for me to; i just removed the note in between
12. 00:42:777 (2,1) - might be confusing to the newbies, as these are the same exact sliders but longer made changes
13. 01:06:777 (1,2,3) - doesn't look good
14. 01:21:954 (6,1) - make it evenly spaced out! I think it's because of the SV change you use haha. Using 1.00x would fix it fixed
    
    [Hard]
15. 00:07:483 (1,2,1,2) - Same sound, but DS change is inconsistent. Swap positions of 00:07:483 (1,2) -, and Ctrl+G 00:08:895 (1) - okay !
16. 00:44:189 (1,2) - vs. 00:45:601 (1,2) - Same problem as above i think this is fine here
17. 00:49:836 (1) - There is a good tone change here, so a good place to add jump ^
18. 01:16:836 - add note? Vocal is very strong here o.o pause for intensity control
    
    [Insane]
    SV 1.4 again?? o.o I would look into other ranked maps of similar BPM and make changes to SV, OD, CS, HP drain rate and such accordingly. i think this is fine for an insane
    
19. 00:05:189 (3,4) - The sound is pretty strong at (3). I would move (3) to somewhere like 220,184 sure
20. 00:20:366 (2,3,4,5) - I like c: >-<
21. 00:49:836 (3) - Increase DS, there's a huge sound here o.o the patterns and things around it should already give emphasizes
22. 00:50:542 (2) - here too... ^
23. 00:51:424 (2,3) - change positions, as 00:51:424 (2) - needs more emphasis
24. 00:57:248 (2) - you get the idea by now--DS needs emphasis will be kept in mind, might change later but for now it'll stay the same
25. 01:15:072 (1,2,3) - 01:15:072 (1,2,3) - 01:15:866 - 01:17:277 - add triplet, as there is a prominent drum sound here. 00:54:601 (3,4,5) - you did so here doing so would destroy the pattern
26. 01:26:542 (1,2,3,4) - I would remap this part similar to 01:23:719 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - slowly coming to a calm end
27. 01:28:307 (1,1,1) - the music gets intense, but SV change contradicts it. I would reverse the SV change its a dial out D:
    
    If you want and Easy GD, poke me--I can whip it up quick XD thank you for the offer, but i'm going to keep this set as it is c:

Dashyy- wrote:

hi!!!!! q mod

G:

tbh i feel like the red line should go on 00:03:248 - rather than where you have it now. rn it's ok to have a "pickup note" (or an "anacrusis" for those music experts) before the red line (ex: 00:00:446 (1) - on https://osu.ppy.sh/s/444335). since the spinner isn't really emphasizing anything strong. idk u might wanna ask someone about this i just feel as if it's more appropriate the timing in the ranked mapset also starts at the same place as well

in:

00:03:248 (1,2) - if ur following vocals on these two notes (assuming since 2 is vocal), u should put a circle on the red line after 2 since it sounds awkward to not click on that sound the pause is fine to me, ill wait for more opinion
00:18:072 (3) - this note should receive more emphasis like you did with 00:16:483 (2) - 00:18:072 (3)'s sound is more decreasing, for 00:18:777 (3,4) -
to build up again; theres no need for a flow break
00:19:307 (4) - , 00:22:130 (4) - , 00:23:189 (2) - , same as above
00:31:307 (1) - i don't really get what ur trying to follow on this slider. this would emphasize the piano sound on the white tick appropriately the vocal drowns out the piano sound and is way louder
00:50:189 (1,2,1) - ur using the same ds for 1/1 as u do for 1/2, could mess up a player quite a bit a player this level should be able to determine differences
01:28:307 (1,1,1) - why is the sv decreasing? should be increasing since the sound is getting louder spacing isnt the only way to emphasize a increase in sound, by dialing sv up its a way of showing the intensity as well

hd;

00:03:777 (2) - same issue as insane
00:36:248 (2) - slider should end on 00:36:777 - 00:36:777 - has a different sound, 00:36:248 (2) - is mapped to tete
01:16:659 (1) - should make this a slider instead since u have been using constant 1/2 for the whole kiai answered in many previous mods zzzz

nm:
00:26:542 (3) - you could change these to circles since the sound here is different from the other sliders unnecessary, there isnt too much of a different enough to make it different. 1 2 and 3 are all increasing in intensity /b]
00:37:130 (2) - 3/4 gaps would be kinda confusing to new players who have been doing 1/1 - 1/2 for most of the map. making this a slider would make it easier for the player to recognize [b]theres no music to map to, distance snap should be enough for players to realize. 1 and 2 are stacked for readability so its okay
00:59:719 (3) - sliderend here should be clickable no?? theres no sound after that that can be mapped to without being weird

a

1. some of the hitsound volumes are really low. i don't recommend using hitsound volumes below 35% for a song like this
2. 00:38:542 - auto finish is fine here since there's a cymbal crash; why is this a drum finish?
3. 00:48:601 - you can place a clap here for the snare
4. 00:48:954 - 00:49:042 - hitsound these
5. 00:51:424 - clap here
6. 00:53:895 - 00:54:248 - 00:54:601 - 00:54:689 - 00:54:777 - 00:54:954 - you ignore so many drum sounds please don't do this
7. 01:06:777 - can place a finish here
8. there are a lot more spots where hitsounding could use more work; this is only a foundation for you to work off of. i really do think hitsounding could use a bit of a overhaul cause it's really scarce

1. 00:16:660 (3) - feels a bit out of place, and is also inconsistent with what you did at 00:18:777 (1) - which is essentially the same sound. maybe remove this circle?
2. 00:26:542 (3,1) - technically this isn't properly distance snapped, since the slider velocity change actually changes the values. not really a big deal, but i figured you could space this out a bit more
3. 00:30:601 (2) - i'd consider shortening this to the white tick at 00:31:130 - since it's a bit more emphasized
4. 00:37:130 (2) - sound here is incredibly quiet and feels weird to have it as a clickable object, since the instruments cuts here. maybe you can try changing 00:35:719 (1,2) - into something like this?
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:05:366 (4,5,6,7,1) - can you make this a proper pentagon thanks

1. 00:04:660 (1,2) - i'd consider making these two parallel and then have 00:05:366 (3) - change direction in order to give it more emphasis
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:36:248 (2,3,4) - i'd reconsider the rhythm here; you abruptly switch from piano to vocals and it doesn't really mesh that well here. similarly to what i mentioned in Normal, i think 00:37:130 (4) - would work better if it was on a slider end since this is where the instruments die out. why not try placing a 1/1 slider at 00:36:777 - ?
3. 00:39:248 (3,4,1) - 00:40:660 (2,3,1) - proper equilateral triangles please they're not that hard to make lol
4. 00:49:660 (5,1) - spacing from 5->1 could be a bit more higher in order to emphasize the cymbals and change in tone
5. 01:16:659 (1,2) - the spacing for this 1/1 doesn't really feel right, since it's extremely similar in spacing to other previous patterns you used in the kiai, like 01:14:189 (2,3) - . why not try a rhythm like this?
   
   SPOILER

   

1. 00:15:601 (3,1) - spacing here is really high for 1/4 snap distance. i'm assuming this was unintentional and that (1) was meant to be Ctrl + G'd
2. i don't really mind some of the additive triples since they're used to emphasize the downbeats, but 00:22:307 (5) - really doesn't belong. the music doesn't place any emphasis on the blue ticks here
3. 00:27:248 (1) - i'd consider shortening this to the white tick at 00:27:601 - and adding a circle on the red tick 00:27:777 - . your rhythm choice doesn't really make sense here since it appears that you want to place emphasis on the piano notes
4. 00:31:307 (1) - i'd also change the rhythm for the slider here for the same reason above
5. 00:37:130 (1) - if you're going to switch to vocals because the piano gets cut off, i expect you to follow the vocals more closely. otherwise i'd consider what you did for the other two diffs and just cut it off at the downbeat
6. 00:39:866 - 00:42:689 - 00:44:101 - 01:13:042 - 01:14:454 - 01:15:866 - 01:17:277 - so you're willing to map additive triples but completely ignore these triples that are actually in the music? ok then.
7. 00:49:836 (3,1) - swap NCs
8. 00:58:307 (1) - the buildup would work much more smoothly if this was a circle instead of a slider; since there's no sound on the red tick in this one instance, associating it with 00:58:660 (1,1,1) - which do have sounds on the red ticks makes it feel inconsistent and throws off the whole pattern
9. 01:00:072 (2,3) - i'd space this out more; on first glance it looks extremely similar to 01:00:777 (3,4) - since it appears to be mirrored, even though it really isn't. i'm worried that it'll cause some minor reading issues
10. 01:07:483 (3,4,5) - triple here doesn't sound right; there's no audible sound on the blue tick and additive triples don't work here because the red tick doesn't need to be emphasized
11. 01:21:601 (3) - you're really going to ignore the triples in the drum here?

Doormat wrote:

from my queue

[General]

1. some of the hitsound volumes are really low. i don't recommend using hitsound volumes below 35% for a song like this
2. 00:38:542 - auto finish is fine here since there's a cymbal crash; why is this a drum finish?
3. 00:48:601 - you can place a clap here for the snare
4. 00:48:954 - 00:49:042 - hitsound these
5. 00:51:424 - clap here
6. 00:53:895 - 00:54:248 - 00:54:601 - 00:54:689 - 00:54:777 - 00:54:954 - you ignore so many drum sounds please don't do this
7. 01:06:777 - can place a finish here
8. there are a lot more spots where hitsounding could use more work; this is only a foundation for you to work off of. i really do think hitsounding could use a bit of a overhaul cause it's really scarce the hitsounds will be worked on more and maybe reworked

[Normal]

1. 00:16:660 (3) - feels a bit out of place, and is also inconsistent with what you did at 00:18:777 (1) - which is essentially the same sound. maybe remove this circle? will do
2. 00:26:542 (3,1) - technically this isn't properly distance snapped, since the slider velocity change actually changes the values. not really a big deal, but i figured you could space this out a bit more yeah
3. 00:30:601 (2) - i'd consider shortening this to the white tick at 00:31:130 - since it's a bit more emphasized ok
4. 00:37:130 (2) - sound here is incredibly quiet and feels weird to have it as a clickable object, since the instruments cuts here. maybe you can try changing 00:35:719 (1,2) - into something like this? the object here plays better// more natural then without, but i might change it into something else with more mods
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:05:366 (4,5,6,7,1) - can you make this a proper pentagon thanks made adjustments

[Hard]

1. 00:04:660 (1,2) - i'd consider making these two parallel and then have 00:05:366 (3) - change direction in order to give it more emphasis did by a bit, but not as much
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:36:248 (2,3,4) - i'd reconsider the rhythm here; you abruptly switch from piano to vocals and it doesn't really mesh that well here. similarly to what i mentioned in Normal, i think 00:37:130 (4) - would work better if it was on a slider end since this is where the instruments die out. why not try placing a 1/1 slider at 00:36:777 - ? i think two circles works fine c:
3. 00:39:248 (3,4,1) - 00:40:660 (2,3,1) - proper equilateral triangles please they're not that hard to make lol
4. 00:49:660 (5,1) - spacing from 5->1 could be a bit more higher in order to emphasize the cymbals and change in tone made other changes+ a flow break instead of directly increasing the spacing
5. 01:16:659 (1,2) - the spacing for this 1/1 doesn't really feel right, since it's extremely similar in spacing to other previous patterns you used in the kiai, like 01:14:189 (2,3) - . why not try a rhythm like this? fixed
   
   SPOILER

   

[Insane]

1. 00:15:601 (3,1) - spacing here is really high for 1/4 snap distance. i'm assuming this was unintentional and that (1) was meant to be Ctrl + G'd was intentional
2. i don't really mind some of the additive triples since they're used to emphasize the downbeats, but 00:22:307 (5) - really doesn't belong. the music doesn't place any emphasis on the blue ticks here will look for a solution, but keeping for now
3. 00:27:248 (1) - i'd consider shortening this to the white tick at 00:27:601 - and adding a circle on the red tick 00:27:777 - . your rhythm choice doesn't really make sense here since it appears that you want to place emphasis on the piano notes doing so would complicate the rhythm, the song just reached a calm section; kind of a transition
4. 00:31:307 (1) - i'd also change the rhythm for the slider here for the same reason above ^
5. 00:37:130 (1) - if you're going to switch to vocals because the piano gets cut off, i expect you to follow the vocals more closely. otherwise i'd consider what you did for the other two diffs and just cut it off at the downbeat done
6. 00:39:866 - 00:42:689 - 00:44:101 - 01:13:042 - 01:14:454 - 01:15:866 - 01:17:277 - so you're willing to map additive triples but completely ignore these triples that are actually in the music? ok then. changing these would be a whole lot more stuff added or removed; will go over this with frostings :c
7. 00:49:836 (3,1) - swap NCs
8. 00:58:307 (1) - the buildup would work much more smoothly if this was a circle instead of a slider; since there's no sound on the red tick in this one instance, associating it with 00:58:660 (1,1,1) - which do have sounds on the red ticks makes it feel inconsistent and throws off the whole pattern fixed
9. 01:00:072 (2,3) - i'd space this out more; on first glance it looks extremely similar to 01:00:777 (3,4) - since it appears to be mirrored, even though it really isn't. i'm worried that it'll cause some minor reading issues it should be fine the way it is,
10. 01:07:483 (3,4,5) - triple here doesn't sound right; there's no audible sound on the blue tick and additive triples don't work here because the red tick doesn't need to be emphasized
11. 01:21:601 (3) - you're really going to ignore the triples in the drum here? as stated above for triples

the map has some potential, but too many missing hitsounds and the undermapping/overmapping of certain parts of the song is really holding the mapset back. get some more mods and try calling me back in a few weeks time.

Kisses wrote:

Insane

00:15:954 (1) - An increase in SV would be nice for this section. At the moment it feels lackluster given that it uses the same low SV as the previous calmer section. An SV similar to the kiai would be more fitting imo. About 1.2-1.3 ~ its not as intense as the kiai in my opinion, so 1.2 isnt really needed; the more intense rhythm and spacing even should make up for it

01:28:307 (1,1,1) - This feels slightly lackluster too, the stacking of objects just creates a very anticlimatic ending when it music gets increasingly more emphatic i've gotten so many other mods saying the same and im really considering changing it, but i still like the way its dialing down the song, i'll wait for more opinions from others for it

no kds. If you care for a full mod form me I can if you want that would be very nice cx

thank you gary and kisses!

Jennglebells wrote:

Kisses wrote:

Insane

00:15:954 (1) - An increase in SV would be nice for this section. At the moment it feels lackluster given that it uses the same low SV as the previous calmer section. An SV similar to the kiai would be more fitting imo. About 1.2-1.3 ~ its not as intense as the kiai in my opinion, so 1.2 isnt really needed; the more intense rhythm and spacing even should make up for it Well to me both the intro and kiai have similar intensity and wouldn't really feel unfitting to play. Anyways the main point is that the speed of which your cursor moves for sliders is the exact same of the earlier section and just increasing spacing and rhythm density doesn't feel suffice imho

01:28:307 (1,1,1) - This feels slightly lackluster too, the stacking of objects just creates a very anticlimatic ending when it music gets increasingly more emphatic i've gotten so many other mods saying the same and im really considering changing it, but i still like the way its dialing down the song, i'll wait for more opinions from others for it If you're really adamant on changing the rhythm or pattern would you consider changing the spacing? The pattern overall is easier than your hard diff. Also one thing I would recommend you do to at least is to swap the SVs around; the music get's more climatic from the start to end but your SVs go from fast to slow.



no kds. If you care for a full mod form me I can if you want that would be very nice cx

Kisses wrote:

Insane

1. 00:05:013 (2,3,4,5,6) - to me this kind of sticks out like a sore thumb in this section. The spacing is significantly higher than the rest of the section and I think the increase rhythm density would have been enough. If you don't want to change it then I recommend upping the spacing of 00:06:072 (1,2,3) so it doesn't feel so out of place did by a bit
2. 00:15:601 (3) - I got to agree with doormat here tbh. Just to add something he didn't bring up, the spacing is so big that it is easily misread as a single reverse slider, not something you really want
3. 00:21:424 (1,2) - Listening to this at full speed this did actually sound off to me. After listening to it a few times at 25% I believe the drums to be 1/3 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8726104 (ignore object placements) these are where the drum sounds land from what I can tell. Because of this I would suggest this rhythm or something similar as the transition from 1/4 to 1/3 wouldn't be intuitive if you mapped the entire thing as circles https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8726124 again ignore object placements) i dont really hear any 1/3s.. i looked through the ranked version as well, there are no 1/3s
4. 00:22:307 (3) - I kind of agree with doormat on this too. I would suggest this rhythm https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8726142 as it would fit in with the rhythm you've been using for the entire section with the way you've had triplets on the downbeat. changed; but might have to rework because of 00:15:601 (3) -
   
5. 00:24:424 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - I just wanted to point out that this is the hardest part of the map because you didn't add jumps in at 00:58:660 (1,1,1) - or 01:28:307 (1,1,1)
6. 00:37:130 (1,2,3) - I personally would prefer if you deleted this and had this part empty like the hard diff. Before this part the rhythm naturally follows the piano so when it cuts out it feels natural for you to want to take a break in the map, imo at least. Also it should be pointed out that you even skipped the vocal at 00:36:954 so the transition is awkward too. did something
7. 00:49:836 (3,1,2) - Would suggest using same-ish spacing for all of these objects as they are all of similar intensity.
8. 00:51:072 - This sound here is part of the rhythm 00:51:248 (1,2,3) - within the song so it feels empty to skip over it. Also the spacing 00:50:542 (2,1,2) is a bit weird as 00:50:542 (2,1) have a 1/1 beat apart where as the rest of the pattern 00:51:248 (1,2,3,4,5) uses the same spacing and they are 1/2 a beat apart
9. 00:58:307 (1) - This would be one of those times where I suggest increasing the spacing a lot for a nice emphasis. theres not really a place i can place the circle without it looking weird & unfit D:
   
   

Hard

1. 00:15:601 (1) - This entire section feels a bit like I would map it in a normal tbh :v . The spacing and SVs are so similar to the sections before and after it that when you transition over to them it doesn't feel like you're playing anything different. Also it would be nice to map some of the drum triplets here and there. This kinda goes for the entire map tbh it is a bit slow, but i think it fits pretty well; as for the triples it was explained in another mod
2. 00:35:719 (1,2,3,4) - The structure of this pattern make it very easy to misread 00:36:954 (3,4) because the pattern suggests that 3 will be a 1/2 beat. i moved 3 and 4 up by a bit

[]
Well that's all the energy I have for today, I hope this mod was of use to you ~ thank you uwu

1. 00:31:483 (3) - move this back 1/2 so it follows the vocals. Also you should fix the spacing in this section, it suddenly changes from 1.1 to 1.0 (it should remain 1.1)
2. 00:55:307 (1) - move this back 1/2, I think following the drums is better (make sure you change NC if you do)

1. 01:19:483 (1,2,1) - spacing is kinda weird
2. 01:23:719 (1,2,1) - Transition to the third slider is kinda wild

Frostings wrote:

no kids kids XDDDDDDDDDDDDD

[Normal]

1. 00:31:483 (3) - move this back 1/2 so it follows the vocals. Also you should fix the spacing in this section, it suddenly changes from 1.1 to 1.0 (it should remain 1.1)
2. 00:55:307 (1) - move this back 1/2, I think following the drums is better (make sure you change NC if you do)

[Hard]

1. 01:19:483 (1,2,1) - spacing is kinda weird upped spacing of symmetrical part
2. 01:23:719 (1,2,1) - Transition to the third slider is kinda wild ctrl g ?_?

fixed all; thank you again frostings