Paradoxal wrote:
a similar (arguably worse) diff name was used in another ranked set by tomatas which was also eroge
Yes, but there is not much of a reason to believe precedent applies on difficulty names unless they were recent (a couple of months or so).
tomatas95 wrote:
I still don't get how would a person with a common sense would find an eroge song have "extra weight" to critisize the difficulty name in their own right, [...]
Fair enough - the claim that the map being of an eroge song is somehow an aggravating circumstance doesn't have much basis in... any moderation decision, ever.
tomatas95 wrote:
[...] touching isn't only considered sexual, it has lots of different meanings [...] I've yet to read a good argument as to how on earth this is considered sexual
All right, here's the primary argument: I don't think most people would phrase it "only touch me!" if they meant hand-holding, dating, etc.; rather, they would (as examples) say "please only hold my hand" / "only kiss me", as when you say "only touch me", people think of
sexual touching, as it has a sort of euphemistic meaning. To add to bokeru, "words have meanings", and they have
different meanings based on context, including the context of the rest of the sentence/paragraph/text, but also historical and linguistic context of how that word is used.
Paradoxal & tomatas95 wrote:
- this is a very subjective topic
- [...] it's up to you for making it [the difficulty name] to be sexual.
Admittedly, yes, this is very subjective, but a lot of moderation decisions involving near-ranked maps are. That's why we have the Content Voting Process and Content Review.
But this thread has had
a GMT say that the difficulty name should be changed again because it is likely suggestive (
beatmapsets/2149578/discussion/4528432/general#/4332555/11585799). Resolving a moderation-related discussion
when a moderator has given you the instruction to change something is something that should
only be done when you have a couple GMTs/NATs to back you up on your defence, which is why I'm reopening the discussion for now.
You said that you had asked the opinions of some GMTs, and I believe you, but surely it wouldn't be that much effort to get them to reply to this thread?