1. apple's Expert (6.24 stars, 984 notes)
2. deetz' Insaner (5.1 stars, 821 notes)
3. Hard (3.17 stars, 473 notes)
4. Insane (3.94 stars, 675 notes)
5. Milked (7.33 stars, 973 notes)
6. Normal (1.87 stars, 240 notes)

Logic Agent wrote:

:eyes:

pkhg wrote:

nice bg

Kisses wrote:

top
why did you use different lengths for 01:28:151 (1) and 01:28:857 (1) - ? Maybe the answer is obvious but I couldn't figure out why from first glance it was mostly to make the change in intensity clearer, but fixed for consistency, yes

01:47:922 (2,3,4) - the flow in this pattern comes off as very smooth and circular, whereas all the other patterns have a more strict and harsher/emphatic change in direction on the next slider. Eg 01:48:981 (3,4) - and 01:47:098 (3,4) - etc did ctrl g so it goes anti clockwise then clockwise

Not often you see a nicely structured high bpm map that isn't alt ~

Gaia wrote:

[d tz]
00:33:546 (3,4,5,1) - everything was flowing so nicely and then i c this ok but y tho follows background string thingy
00:37:076 (3,4,5) - some symmetry wud be nice here gradual turn bro
00:47:786 (3) - follows drums 00:48:374 (5,1,2) - hard follows vocals can u make up ur mind pls //same for others I AM DEAF
01:14:029 (3) - rip blanket //also ctrl+g? i dont c a potential blanket here, also ctrl g would ruin flow lol
01:27:445 (1) - 1/2 reverse would be nice nah i like this movement
02:44:293 (5) - ctrl+g would be so much nicer imo since it's not that stressed here the intent of this is to make the stop in movement at 02:44:293 (5,6,7) - more apparent

iYiyo wrote:

[deetz' Insaner]
[*]why insaner? xP cuz it aint no insane
[*]00:14:128 (3,4,5,6) - compared to the previous notes of this section, i feel like all this combo is too tight, why not distance 00:14:128 (3,4) - from 00:14:716 (5,6) - a bit? distance between heads is fine as it is
[*]00:15:776 (3) - add NC for different piano notes? nah i find this easier to read
[*]00:37:312 - tbh i feel like this beat should be clickable. 00:33:193 (2,3) - here for example you followed vocals to start the slider on the red tick so you could map 00:33:546 (3) - as expected, so why not the same for the next one? because in the second one, the vocal sound is more drawn out
[*]00:40:607 (7,8,9,10,11) - maybe set better the structure for this pattern? i feel like the DS between them it's a bit inconsistent with others + i was a bit confused when playing it cause i didn't recognized the space in the timeline. https://puu.sh/y3aZq/eee19b1b4a.jpg any 1/1 patterns in this part are either spaced much larger or stacked, so this shouldn't be a problem. the people who i got to test didn't have any trouble with it, but i'll see if anyone else does
[*]00:46:138 (4) - i guess adding a nc would show better the change in spacing. prefer not using NCs like this for red ticks. also the spacing is more than big enough to be indicative on its own.
[*]01:01:790 - since you're mapping the vocals pitchs here i really feel like you should make this beat clickable. why not convert the 1/1 into a 1/2 + circle? would play better imo same reasoning as before, this is a really drawn out vocal note and i prefer this
[*]01:39:919 - feels weird/empty not to have a clap there D: you're right... but i'm not sure how to best deal with this without changing what i wanted that section to be. for now i don't think it's that bad a compromise
[*]02:14:989 (1) - offscreen? https://puu.sh/y3bvD/d460932ae7.jpg
[*]03:18:892 (3,4) - hmm i think that ctrl+g this and rearrange the hitsounds would work better, mainly because of the downbeat not being clickable, felt kinda confusing the rhythm for me tbh. if i did that, i wouldn't be representing the sounds properly[/list][/notice]

Sotarks wrote:

deetz
00:40:607 (7) - nc thx u 2
nice way to represent the song here guuuuud thx u 2

Kisses wrote:

Milkied

• 
  Is Milkied intentional or did you misspell Milked? lol i've been lied all mylife

1. 00:47:197 (1) - to 00:52:846 (1) - ok so I can't tell what you're actually trying to follow here. Could you explain your logic? This section seems switches between the drum and vocals too often to feel intuitive. it follows the melody in combination with drums, because only following the melody would end in having 1/2 spam which is boring imo
   Apart from the above I can see the logic in the rest of your rhythms so yeah
2. 01:38:743 (1) - missing whistle on head? ok
3. 01:46:274 (1,2,1,2) - imho bigger jumps would create a bigger contrast between this and the next section. As of right now the spacings feel quite similar and they almost blend in with each other spaced more 01:46:627 (2) - i dont want to do all the circles big jumps cuz the next next is chill
4. 02:46:999 (1,2) - blanket mod hehe xd. tbh it doesnt matter ok xd
5. I think the choruses could do with buffing a bit. There are quite a number of places where it felt lackluster for the chorus and the only difficult part were the jumps in the middle. For example, there are quite a number of instances of relatively low spacing such as 01:10:734 (1,2,3,4) where it felt underspaced. I'm not gonna pinpoint them all, just tell me if you agree with what I said uhm the highlight of the map isnt the jumps (atleast for me xd)
   it's instead the use of different rhythms and ideas during the whole map. also i think the sv being higher than non kiai stuff, and the normal set hitsounds is enough to accomplish what you're trying to say

If you're happy to have me mod the other diffs let me know not sure what it means xd

Kisses wrote:

Apple

1. 00:42:725 (3) - can you have a slight pause in rhythm here? The whole verse is a continuous smashing of objects and because the song actually takes a small pause at 00:42:725 it doesn't really reflect the music. A slider doesn't do justice since there are so many sliders there is no contrast at all // if i were to put a pause here it'd totally ruin this section tho, because it super dense due to the vocals at nearly every beat. therefore mapping the silence with a slider end is ok for me. using 1/1 wouldnt really help either bc the sound of (4)'s head is really strong ):
2. 01:49:981 (3) - are you sure you want an object mapped to a 1/4 beat? iirc neither the top or this diff have any 1/4 beats (apart from this one instance). You could just extend 01:49:805 (2) by one tick // for these i cant really agree. i think the heavy 3/4 usage in the top diff is way harder than this single 1/4note, which in reality plays even easier than a triplet. patterns like these i feel still represent the music and arent necessarily harder bc people who can play this level should definitely be familiar with bursts
3. 01:52:806 (3) - and 02:21:991 (3) - ^
   ok maybe 3 instances does justify the usage, maybe, but I still think it would be good if you omitted all 1/4 beats because of the bpm and how you've mapped the rest of the diff

[]w~

If you're happy to have me mod the other diffs let me know

Kisses wrote:

Deetz

1. The spacing of 01:17:324 (1) of 03:04:887 (1) feels a tad high with how you were naturally flowing around the playfield throughout the kiai. With 03:04:887 (1) you could ctrl + g which would make it a lot more fitting imo but you'd have to change the placement of the object after. it's a bit of a reach, but i think it's reasonable - after all, the vocal note is quite noticeably stronger
2. When you cobine 01:45:333 (2,3) - and 01:45:804 (1,2,3,4) - it makes it so there is no contrast which I feel is a sin give that the music is different in these 2 parts sure

[]

Kisses wrote:

Made a new post because I felt like it ~

red = must change
everything else = consider + reply

Top diff
00:28:368 (1) - and 00:46:373 (1) - these 2 sliders are structured slightly different than the sliders in the rest of the map. How about a quick reshape? ok

02:35:702 (1,2,3,4) - you don't need to do this if you don't want to but have you ever thought about curving these like the 2 patterns before it https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9461963 ? Consistency police like to roam osu beatmap forums i wanted to make the change in intruments more clear by using a different shape

hp 5 like the 2 diffs below? might be nice since it's such a difficult map it would give players a bit of room for error on some hard parts (especially if they use HR). This is up to you though. it'll be too easy i think, did 5.5 xd

You're going to have to change the BG. Sorry but some members of the QAT have told me that the current BG is a bit too revealing so you're going to need to change if you want me to push it any further what about now w

[]w ~

do you have a source? http://www.nicovideo.jp/watch/sm23530371 nameless meta, and romanised from the original version here http://www.nicovideo.jp/watch/sm23404002 . hope that's enough xd

Kroytz wrote:

Hi Milan- I like this song.

Top diff

02:10:753 (3,4,1,2) - Don't you think this might be a little confusing to identify? The circles atop the slider-ends are treated the same for different snaps. You consistently put the circle on the slider-end for all the 3/4 sliders so maybe as solution: Move (4) elsewhere or curve (3) so that (4) can be blanketed? Similar to 02:11:694 (4,5) - did

02:37:585 (1) - Doesn't feel so strong to me but it's fine as is. it's fine to me xd gotta keep the triangle

02:40:174 (6) - NC and remove NC from 02:40:880 (1) - ? The NC in this section is kind of weird I think there could be more NCs but not needed. (Would also help a little for HP drain stuff) spammed ncs

02:45:116 (1) - This could be emphasized. Could stack 02:44:999 (2) - on top of 02:44:528 (3) - . Or if you don't like this suggestion at least place (2) at 269:298 for the perfect triangle since it's a little off as it is. uhm but then the short distance between 02:44:881 (1,2) - wouldnt make sense.
also tried moving (2) where u said but it ends being way more off owo

02:58:297 (1) - This doesn't get any emphasis. Comparing it to a previous chorus where 02:05:339 (4,1) - is more properly spaced and even in the first chorus with 01:09:557 (4,1) - dropped emphasis on 02:58:297 (1) - to make 02:58:650 (3) - stand out even more, i think both ways are viable and little variation between chorus is cool

02:59:238 (1) - Same as above for exact reasons you did prior with the choruses.

03:11:595 (1) - Could try a slider like this for subtle blanket http://puu.sh/yfdWA/0d579c759d.jpg The linear slider you have is nice enough tho, this was just another idea. did it but a bit more subtle

03:19:009 (1) - I don't hear Finish on this? i tried whistle but doesnt sound that strong, also it isnt normal finsh so i think it's fine uhm

03:28:895 (1,2,1,2) - This is so weird lol.. The other patterns are nicer drums are different from 03:27:953 (1,2,1,2) - that'swhy

03:32:896 (1) - Kick slider could be used here as a cute sorta ending~ oki

Good map, good set. Best of luck! Thanks for looking at it w

Milan- wrote:

i've never understood why people add vocaloid in a no vocaloid song xd

Monstrata wrote:

apple's Expert

00:28:368 (1,2) - How about making this a slider? 4 clicks in a row here just seems kinda forced imo // hm but mapping such distinct piano sounds with sliders would make it seem like any other part of the map... i think those 4 circle should be totally fine bc i switch from 3 and 2 note rhythms in the calmer alternate sections as well
01:07:910 (1) - Can you make this a better curve cuz you have a double blanket pattern? eh, tbh this kinda applies to other places too /shrug imo your aesthetic is still clean enough that these sliders end up standing out in a not so good way xP // i tried but i dont really do perfect blankets ):

Monstrata wrote:

deetz' Insaner

00:28:368 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Should really be 3 sets of triplets and then a 5-plet xP. Also the notes on 00:29:898 (6,7,8) - end up not feeling any different from the rest due to the stream pattern. can't really agree on this one. i think it's fair to omit what i did, and plus this fits the new guitar thingy better
00:57:906 (6,7,8) - Is this supposed to be curved? just answer yes or no. woops, spacing was also fucked here lol
01:17:089 (2,1) - This just feels like way too much of a spike xP. Doesn't help that 1 is a flowbreak. (Also bottom right to top left is the worst of the four corner jump movements if you're righthanded.) flowbreak is the point but i reduced the spacing as multiple ppl mentioned it lol

Monstrata wrote:

Milked

00:15:540 - Is there a reason this note isn't clickable? I imagine just adding another stack under 2 would work. wanted to make the gap in the drums more clear, fits well as a 'section breaker' imo w
00:29:074 (1,2,3,1,2) - This rhythm sounds kinda off to me. 00:29:309 (3) - Sounds better as two circles while 00:29:074 (1,2) - cuz of the guitar, sounds better as a slider. 00:29:545 (1,2) - same. i think we're listening to different layers xd, im just mapping to the electronic/flaute? sounds

This rhythm instead?

02:42:998 (3,4) - Slider instead? since the previous one was a slider. Kinda out of place to switch to circle jumpsok
02:51:236 (3,4,5) - Ctr;+G rhythm for vocals/ D: kok

Insane

00:30:368 (1) - The loop at the end kinda detracts from the slider's effect imo. ok

just do this? simple and straightforward movement is better imo

[]

rest looks fine, and modding assistant says this map is fine so it must be fine.