1. Easy (1.46 stars, 243 notes)
2. Extra (5.28 stars, 1089 notes)
3. Freeze (6.05 stars, 1227 notes)
4. Hard (3.3 stars, 718 notes)
5. Insane (4.26 stars, 817 notes)
6. Normal (2.27 stars, 405 notes)

1. 00:17:431 (5,6) - i'd ctrl g these. The vertical movement is more natural in that way
2. 00:19:842 - the clap pattern from here to 00:24:128 - sounds a bit bad imo. As they dont really follow the music, they are just there. Try listening to the snares again
3. 00:27:878 (5) - add clap
4. 00:27:878 (5,6,7,8,1) - the music on that pattern gets stronger. Decreasing the distance doesn't fits the music very well imo (in addition, you could move 00:28:413 (1) - more to the left, like x226y309, to create a better circular flow.)
5. 00:58:145 (1) - i believe you dont need this nc, same 01:09:663 (1) - 03:10:199 (1) - 04:02:163 (1) - 04:03:770 (1) -
6. 01:10:467 (2,3) - distance is a bit too short for what you've done so far in this section. Try moving (2) around x290y134?
7. 01:10:869 (1,3) - claps instead of whistles sound better imo. (also from 01:02:699 - till this point, i found the 1/1 clap spam quite annoying and unfitting. Every 2/1 fits more as this is a "calm part". The same on this part 01:15:556 - altho i dunno.. it just sounds annoying on my end as those claps doesn't fit the music very well)
8. 01:22:922 (1) - this whistle on slider body tho, i dont think it was on purpuse xd
9. 01:48:770 (1,2) - this has the same rhythm as 01:48:235 (3) - 01:47:163 (3) - 01:46:092 (3) - but you decided to map it differently. It's quite annoying cuz the sound on 1 and 2 is pretty much muted so i end hitting 2 way too early or late. You should reconsider using a 1/8 from (1), (or increase the hs volumen, i barely hear it hue)
10. 01:53:860 (4) - rather use a 1/4 slider and add a note at the end instead of using sliderend to cover those kind of beats.
11. 02:15:288 (4,1,2,3) - distance looks a bit random here, even tho it may makes sense, you make me think it doesnt, aaaaaaaa like the distance between 02:15:556 (1,2) - is big, but then 02:15:690 (2,3,4,5,1,2,1,2,1,2) - all this is normal. Not sure how it may plays but try x357y154?
12. 02:43:681 (2) - i'd use whistle instead of clap on head. it's the same sound as 02:43:949 (3) - so it makes sense. similar here 03:34:842 (1,2,3,4) - would be nice if all 4 had the same hs
13. 03:44:485 (1) - try ctrl+g? or just move 03:44:351 (8) - more away from (1). i feel like you're loosing a lot of emphasis by putting that slider so close to 8
14. 03:55:065 (8,1) - same here^
15. 01:59:485 - shouldnt these sliders end on 1/6(? like you do that on similar rhythms

1. od -0.5? Like your extra is 8
2. 00:15:288 (4,1) - 00:23:860 (4,1) - you should add more distance between these. The pattern is like increasing distance, and the music too, but then you stop on (1), which feels really forced and awkward.
3. 00:30:824 (3,4) - eh i'd merge these into a 1/1 slider, so you're not clicking a "ghost" note
4. 00:50:645 (4) - 00:51:717 (4) - using slider tails to cover big beats, in higher diffs, is a bad thing nowadays it seems. Try to avoid that using 2 circles instead, or 3/4 sliders or something else
5. 01:38:592 (5,6,1) - jumps should be placed towards big beats, instead of simple offbeats. I mean, jump between 6-1 makes more sense than jumping between 5-6
6. 01:42:878 (3,2) - this little overlap is rather ugly /w\ do you mind moving stuff?
7. 02:23:056 - would be nice if a circle were here, just for hitsound purpuses
8. 02:49:574 (3,4,1) - this rhythm is a bit weird imo, try something like this? http://puu.sh/iKfsB/bda70ef35d.jpg the idea is to follow the guitar(or whatever instrument it is) much better and avoid using tail for strong beats, ya.
9. 03:27:074 (1) - why this nc ? doesnt seem necessary
10. 03:35:645 (1,1) - move this a bit more down like x407y311, cuz auto stack messes the straight line you try to make

1. 00:30:824 (5,1) - same as insane. This isnt really important xd but it just feels a bit empty while playing
2. 00:40:735 (3,1) - can you blanket? this looks bit ugly ;w,
3. 01:24:128 (3) - nc?
4. 02:53:860 (4,1,2) - this sounds more like this to me http://puu.sh/iKghF/6665d61c5d.jpg 02:54:395 - doesnt sound really important and fit more with slider tail
5. 03:17:431 - i think you should add a 1/2 slider here, otherwise it sounds kinda empty just having 03:17:699 (1) - for vocals

1. try +1 hp/od. The spreed 3/4/7 doesnt look very good
2. 00:28:949 (2,1) - ehhm this sounds really empty. Try using the snares for the rhythm instead, sounds cooler. like here http://puu.sh/iKgDt/6587163e13.jpg or just use 3/2 gaps or whatever. same with 00:31:092 (1) -
3. 02:06:985 (3) - try this? http://puu.sh/iKgXG/7125055410.jpg the rhythm you're using sounds weird >w<
4. 02:48:503 (4,2) - these should have the same rhythm imo. Kinda weird to hear just 1 being 1/2
5. 03:21:717 (4,1) - this stack is quite random. You dont really stack anything in the whole map and may end confusing people
6. You'll probably have to get rid of those 1/2 multi repeaters

1. 00:53:056 (2) - you should really avoid doing this at this level x.x it's so confusing for newbies. and specially in this map where the sv is so low
2. 03:17:699 (1,2) - i'd avoid using this 1/1 stack, you have done stack before but 2/1. and also you barely use 1/1 in the whole map, so i think it'd be better to move these notes away

Milan- wrote:

cool, waiting to see the harder insane o

Milan- wrote:

SPOILER

eeaaaaaagf m4m plz

[snow]

1. 00:17:431 (5,6) - i'd ctrl g these. The vertical movement is more natural in that way That's not the flow I have in mind though
2. 00:19:842 - the clap pattern from here to 00:24:128 - sounds a bit bad imo. As they dont really follow the music, they are just there. Try listening to the snares again I don't know, I guess I'll have to work on the hitsounds, but it says this way for now because I actually don't dislike it, and if I really follow the claps in the music it doesn't feel constant anymore.
3. 00:27:878 (5) - add clap added
4. 00:27:878 (5,6,7,8,1) - the music on that pattern gets stronger. Decreasing the distance doesn't fits the music very well imo (in addition, you could move 00:28:413 (1) - more to the left, like x226y309, to create a better circular flow.) I don't think it's that much stronger, the square represents the strong part but the next section is still lighter to me.
5. 00:58:145 (1) - i believe you dont need this nc, same 01:09:663 (1) - 03:10:199 (1) - sort of fixed this one 04:02:163 (1) - 04:03:770 (1) - They are a part of the pattern, they look better and lighter this way, and it's always easier to read this way.
6. 01:10:467 (2,3) - distance is a bit too short for what you've done so far in this section. Try moving (2) around x290y134? It still represents pretty the idea I make of this part of the music and it doesn't change that much the gameplay neither.
7. 01:10:869 (1,3) - claps instead of whistles sound better imo. fixed (also from 01:02:699 - till this point, i found the 1/1 clap spam quite annoying and unfitting. Every 2/1 fits more as this is a "calm part". The same on this part 01:15:556 - altho i dunno.. it just sounds annoying on my end as those claps doesn't fit the music very well) didn't fix the other points because they're still adding some speed to the rythme
8. 01:22:922 (1) - this whistle on slider body tho, i dont think it was on purpuse xd ye fixed
9. 01:48:770 (1,2) - this has the same rhythm as 01:48:235 (3) - 01:47:163 (3) - 01:46:092 (3) - but you decided to map it differently. It's quite annoying cuz the sound on 1 and 2 is pretty much muted so i end hitting 2 way too early or late. You should reconsider using a 1/8 from (1), (or increase the hs volumen, i barely hear it hue) No because it would be unreadable. And I also really like the way it plays right now I increased volume a bit on (1)
10. 01:53:860 (4) - rather use a 1/4 slider and add a note at the end instead of using sliderend to cover those kind of beats. fixed
11. 02:15:288 (4,1,2,3) - distance looks a bit random here, even tho it may makes sense, you make me think it doesnt, aaaaaaaa like the distance between 02:15:556 (1,2) - is big, but then 02:15:690 (2,3,4,5,1,2,1,2,1,2) - all this is normal. Not sure how it may plays but try x357y154? changed it in another way. I'll see if it's better. Actually no, I might change it if someone else complains about it but I find the flow better this way.
12. 02:43:681 (2) - i'd use whistle instead of clap on head. it's the same sound as 02:43:949 (3) - so it makes sense. similar here 03:34:842 (1,2,3,4) - would be nice if all 4 had the same hs Yep, forgot to change it, it sounds way better now
13. 03:44:485 (1) - try ctrl+g? or just move 03:44:351 (8) - more away from (1). i feel like you're loosing a lot of emphasis by putting that slider so close to 8 Moved (8) slightly away, might eventually be enough for the empasize.
14. 03:55:065 (8,1) - same here^ I made it a bit more away but didn't fix as you wanted, I like the way it is and this spacing makes the player more focused on it which might end up with the same feel actually
15. 01:59:485 - shouldnt these sliders end on 1/6(? like you do that on similar rhythms Nope, it's not the same rythme, I think. The 1/4 here sounds pretty much ok, while putting 1/4 instead of the 1/6 sounds just bad.

[insane]

1. od -0.5? Like your extra is 8 fixed
2. 00:15:288 (4,1) - 00:23:860 (4,1) - you should add more distance between these. The pattern is like increasing distance, and the music too, but then you stop on (1), which feels really forced and awkward. Yep, I managed to add some distance.
3. 00:30:824 (3,4) - eh i'd merge these into a 1/1 slider, so you're not clicking a "ghost" note fixed, somehow
4. 00:50:645 (4) - 00:51:717 (4) - using slider tails to cover big beats, in higher diffs, is a bad thing nowadays it seems. Try to avoid that using 2 circles instead, or 3/4 sliders or something else I know but I'd still like to follow the melody here.
5. 01:38:592 (5,6,1) - jumps should be placed towards big beats, instead of simple offbeats. I mean, jump between 6-1 makes more sense than jumping between 5-6 Yes, but I sincerly think it plays really good the way it is here.
6. 01:42:878 (3,2) - this little overlap is rather ugly /w\ do you mind moving stuff? yes sure lol
7. 02:23:056 - would be nice if a circle were here, just for hitsound purpuses fixed
8. 02:49:574 (3,4,1) - this rhythm is a bit weird imo, try something like this? http://puu.sh/iKfsB/bda70ef35d.jpg the idea is to follow the guitar(or whatever instrument it is) much better and avoid using tail for strong beats, ya. changed in another way, I'll see if it's any better
9. 03:27:074 (1) - why this nc ? doesnt seem necessary yes fixed
10. 03:35:645 (1,1) - move this a bit more down like x407y311, cuz auto stack messes the straight line you try to make Yes, way better now

[Hard]

1. 00:30:824 (5,1) - same as insane. This isnt really important xd but it just feels a bit empty while playing Mh.. Considering this is a hard I like the "simplified" rythme here, a lot, it plays awesome with DT too x)
2. 00:40:735 (3,1) - can you blanket? this looks bit ugly ;w, yes, my bad
3. 01:24:128 (3) - nc? yep yep
4. 02:53:860 (4,1,2) - this sounds more like this to me http://puu.sh/iKghF/6665d61c5d.jpg 02:54:395 - doesnt sound really important and fit more with slider tail I guess the way you suggest is more accurate considering the fact that you hit the strong beat, but still, I don't like the empty tick right after the slider in this case
5. 03:17:431 - i think you should add a 1/2 slider here, otherwise it sounds kinda empty just having 03:17:699 (1) - for vocals yes, ok

[normal]

1. try +1 hp/od. The spreed 3/4/7 doesnt look very good fixed
2. 00:28:949 (2,1) - ehhm this sounds really empty. Try using the snares for the rhythm instead, sounds cooler. like here http://puu.sh/iKgDt/6587163e13.jpg or just use 3/2 gaps or whatever. same with 00:31:092 (1) - It was like this but changed for the sake of star rating... http://puu.sh/iKH0R/377a03e5e6.png
3. 02:06:985 (3) - try this? http://puu.sh/iKgXG/7125055410.jpg the rhythm you're using sounds weird >w< Yes, way better lol
4. 02:48:503 (4,2) - these should have the same rhythm imo. Kinda weird to hear just 1 being 1/2 I don't mind changing it, but I really think it sounds better this way, because 02:48:503 (4) - is way more stronger, I think.
5. 03:21:717 (4,1) - this stack is quite random. You dont really stack anything in the whole map and may end confusing people I find it pretty neat though, there's nothing behind.. I'll change if somelse complains about it though.
6. You'll probably have to get rid of those 1/2 multi repeaters we'll see then i.i

[easy]

1. 00:53:056 (2) - you should really avoid doing this at this level x.x it's so confusing for newbies. and specially in this map where the sv is so low well, I'm not really sure how to fix it
2. 03:17:699 (1,2) - i'd avoid using this 1/1 stack, you have done stack before but 2/1. and also you barely use 1/1 in the whole map, so i think it'd be better to move these notes away I thought it was actually helpful in gameplay lol, fixed anyway !

cool, waiting to see the harder insane o uhghghghgh one day, maybe. I'll do my best to go without >.>

RikiH_ wrote:

SPOILER

M4M

General

Maybe the diff spread between Insane and Snow is too high, but I'm not sure, ask a BN about it Yes, might be a problem, we'll see.

Snow

00:02:699 (1,2,3,4) - Are you sure this is 1/3? So weird, the following part (00:11:270 - and so on) has the same beats but it's 1/2. I tried to change your sliders into 1/2 and it sounds well, too... I'm not sure about it so ask other mods. 1/2 would work too, but 1/3 is cool too. Also you're wrong, there's no beats in the intro (except when I mapped 1/1) while from here 00:11:270 (1) - there's definetly something at the red tick
00:03:770 (1,2,1,2) - Sounds a bit weird to be honest, 1/3 (or 1/2) rhythm here would be maybe boring but it would fit better in my opinion As I said in previous point the 1/1 are following the beats, the 1/3 the synthe
00:10:199 - Until this point, same as above ^
00:48:636 (5) - If you want to be consistent with the previous rhythm, you should remove this note Well, I know what you mean but I'm just following the music, and the previous part is already long enough lol
00:50:645 (2,3) - 1/2 here sounds a bit strange, I suggest you to put a slider here, like you did here 00:51:717 (4,1) You're not wrong but I still think this is perfect atmosphere for this part
00:58:145 (1,2) - Why a NC here? NCs are part of the pattern. Also it's always pleasant in term of readability to put 1/2 NCs
01:19:038 (3,4) - I don't like these sliders, they are both straight and stacked, I'd make curved sliders here, if I were you, they would look better. If you don't want to change these, stack them properly I think they're already stacked properly? I don't know... I like them, I'm not changing them though.
01:22:253 (1,2) - Same as above, why NC? same as above. such an electric pattern xD
01:28:011 (1) - I'm 99% sure this note should be 1/2 earlier, on 01:27:878 - Nope I'm following the beat. not the breathing of miku (does she even breath wtf)
01:48:770 (1,2) - In my opinion it sounds much better if you use a single 1/8 slider here and delete that note and that 1/2 pause Would be unreadable
01:57:878 - This pause feels weird... I think you should start this awesome pattern 01:58:413 - here Nope, following the music not the voice, it wouldn't have enough feedback at all
02:19:038 (1,2) - Same stuff about NC same
02:26:940 (1) - Same as 01:28:011 same
02:35:645 (1,2) - NC. This applies on all NCs like this, from now on I won't point it out anymore, just go through the map and change everything, if you want to, of course. Not changing my position on them ^^
04:11:270 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I'd increase the spacing here, they are the final notes, plus, the song gets more intense here, compared to 04:09:128 (1,2,3,4,1,2) I still need to think about the last 4 sliders, if I want to make them faster or increase spacing, but still... I don't want to change the diagram. Also, to follow your own idea, I'd say no, because the spacing might not be that much bigger from the previous sliders, but the SV is way higher which makes a hugh difference already in playmode.

Insane

00:03:770 (1,2,3,4) - Same stuff I pointed out in Snow diff I think this is enough simplified here
01:00:556 (1,3) - This overlap looks ugly to me Made it more clear. (it's still an overlap though)
01:59:485 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - This is weird, you put 3 notes combos in the first part and 2 notes combos in the second part, even though the sound exactly the same... I guess this is questionable but still, the NCs offer some variety that the rythme doesn''t.
02:23:056 - Add a note with finish here and let the spinner begin 1/4 later? fixed
03:30:154 (4,5,6,1) - I don't like this curve, you should re-arrange these notes and make a more circular pattern Mh I kinda like it actually (1) is breaking the cruve but not the flow, I think.

Hard

00:40:735 (3,1) - I don't usually point out blankets, but this is really ugly, fix it please fixed
01:01:628 (1,2) - Uhm, the second slider should start on 01:01:895 - At the moment it sounds werid, since it starts on a red tick it's not natural to start slider on red tick but it's acceptable if it follows the music, which is the case here.

Normal

02:42:878 (4,1) - Make these symmetrical? They're more like ctrl+g I don't think it's a bad thing I improved the shape of (1) in a way it looks like (4) though.
03:12:342 (1,2,3,4) - This is a copy-paste of the previous pattern, I suggest to change it into something better Well.. I still think it fits the music the way it is, I find it pretty fun the fact it repeats.

Easy

01:02:431 (2,3) - I suggest avoiding to stack objects in easy diffs, they can be confusing for newbies. This applies on every stacked object in this diff Yes, it's not recommended, but still it stays pretty neat here.

___________

Really awesome map, congratulations. Good luck for ranking Thanks ! Sorry didn't make that much changements, but thanks for the check!

FCL wrote:

M4M plz

Easy
00:47:699 (1,2) - You can change like here That would touch (4) so nope, nothing's wrong in my way.

SPOILER

00:57:342 (1) - Maybe here it is better to insert sliderwave Why?
04:09:128 (1,2,3,4) - I think that two sliders would look better It's a square.. I don't know what's wrong with the look of a square.

Normal
01:58:413 (1,1) - I think this arrangement of notes looks better Mind the gap !!! You can't put notes right after spinner in easy/normal ! It's confusing.

SPOILER

03:40:199 (1,2) - It looks nice but the flow feels pretty bad though.

SPOILER

03:44:485 - I think there need another slider Mind the gap !!!

SPOILER

Hard
02:22:654 - You can add 2 circles I could... But I'd still prefer to focus on the vocal here.
02:46:494 - Here, too, you can add a circle There's no beat
03:16:628 - And then, there would have looked good 2nd spinner Won't be rankable, cause ninja spinner (that goes under 3000 by auto) and 2nd spinner usually plays awful
03:17:967 (2) - Instead of circle, you can put a sliderwave with reduced 2 times speed I let it for extra, it can be an easy sliderbreak and I don't see how the flow could be cool the things are set up here.
03:51:985 (1) - ^ Sounds better here, but still, the end of the slider should finish on 1/4 and I don't really want it for my hard diff. I guess I'll think about those last 2 points, but since there's nothing wrong in my way, I might not change it anyway.

Insane
I dunno what to pay attention to here =)
Good luck

1. comme je te l'avais dis en pm, une Insane plus dur devra être nécessaire, enfin, une diff entre l'Insane actuelle et l'Extra quoi. D:

1. 00:33:770 (1) - pour tous les patterns similaire, je trouve ça réellement dommage de rendre 00:33:904 - 00:34:038 - passif en simple arrow/fin de slider. étant donné que le son avec la guitare est quand même assez strong et est quand même assez dominant sur cette partie.
2. étant donné que tu a l'air de chercher à follow la melody, ça me fait personnellement bizarre de ne pas avoir un "hold" içi 00:51:315 - . Peut être serait il mieux d'avoir un circle à la place de 00:51:181 (2) - afin de pouvoir ajouter un "hold" via un slider sur le red tick melody.
3. 01:20:779 (1,2) - j'aurais plutot tendance à faire en sorte que (2) soit simplement un slider 1/2 afin de rendre la note vocal içi clickable : 01:21:449 - . Tout en gardant le sentiment de rester appuyer sur la longue note vocal via le slider 1/2 d'içi 01:21:181 - . J'aurais aussi plutot tendence à rendre la timeline différente entre les 2 notes 01:20:779 (1,2) - . Etant donné que le 1er slider à une note vocal sur son début, mais pas sur sa fin, tandis que le 2eme slider, a une note vocal au début et à la fin.
4. 01:22:922 (1,2) - 02:17:565 (1,2) - 02:19:708 (1,2) - ^
5. 02:08:190 - je trouve ça personnellement dommage de faire un break plutot que de mapper la melody.
6. 02:57:342 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Je sais pas ce que t'en pense, mais perso, je pense que plutot d'avoir un spacing bien constant entre eux, le mieux serait de l'avoir en spacing qui augmente. Etant donné que la melody donne un sentiment d'augmentation, d'élévation. Un truc dans ce genre
7. 02:58:413 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - ^ pareil, mais plutot en diminuant je pense.

1. 00:17:565 (4,1) - 00:26:137 (4,1) - 03:59:351 (4,1) - j'aurais tendance à faire un jump entre ces 2 notes, un peu comme içi 00:13:279 (4,1) - .
2. 00:33:770 (1) - j'aurais tendance à te faire la même réflexion que sur l'Extra D:
3. 00:50:110 (2,3,4) - J'aurais plutot tendance à vouloir change la timeline dans ce style la afin de mieux suivre la melody. Etant donné que ton slider içi 00:50:645 (4) - est clairement pour la melody.
4. 00:51:181 (2,3,4) - plus ou moins la même chose étant donné que la melody est similaire.
5. 02:43:413 (1,1,1) - Perso je préfère ces 3 notes avec un sampleset normal + whistle.
6. 02:45:556 (1) - étant donné que tu cherchais à suivre la melody, ce slider ignore complétement la melody qu'il y a içi : 02:45:958 - .
   

Yauxo wrote:

Text.

Yauxo wrote:

Also, if QATs go nazi on 4:59 Minute songs, then they will also go nazi on a 1.81 I -> X "spread"

hanyuu_nanodesu wrote:

SPOILER

Hi M4M from your modding Q
My map btw : https://osu.ppy.sh/s/322414

[General]

1. Your diff spread is fine imo. I have a big diff gap as well -w- -w-
2. Disable widescreen support (song setup -> design), it's only used for storyboard yep fixed
3. This song have (unofficial maybe, dunno) MV right? Why don't you add it? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8vbgNLDNDM gotta add it i guess yes

[Easy]

1. 00:17:163 (1) - you can curve this the other way so it'll blanket (2) http://puu.sh/iXib8/d7f3d5c06a.jpg furthermore, if you don't change, you can still make the shape better. I don't like the flow, fixed the shape a bit though
2. 00:33:770 (2) - Actually for Easy, a circle would work better but considering you used a lot of it, I think you won't change. I'll change if someone else complains about it too
3. 00:41:270 (2) - I would prefer to NC here instead of here 00:40:199 (1) - because that's where the new verse start. I think it make more sense. yes, fixed
4. 00:53:056 (2) - I think for high speed BPM song like this, avoid using 1/2 interval... Maybe you could use 1 1/2 slider instead. http://puu.sh/iXini/9e0818205e.jpg it'll still cover up nicely. fixed
5. 00:57:342 (1) - Maybe this wasn't mean to be slider wave but I think it's better to keep it as slider wave... mh I don't know I like this shape
6. 01:30:556 (1) - Try making the straight part before red anchor and after red anchor parallel. It'll looks better http://puu.sh/iXiuv/c7da8b35cd.jpg fixed
7. 01:32:699 (3) - ^ fixed
8. 01:48:770 (4) - Not really necessary, just suggestion; but maybe NC because the sound you followed change? Like you did here 01:58:413 (1) - I find the changement in your second example way more intensive, I try to not overdo the NC in Easy.
9. 02:21:985 (2,3) - I'm pretty sure it'll fit the song (vocal) better if you ctrl+g this. fix
10. 02:43:413 (1,2) - why don't simply use 1/1 reverse slider? .-. fixed
11. 03:19:306 (3) - NC here because you just passing a big white tick that indicates the start of chorus. fixed
12. 04:05:913 (3,5) - The tail could be blanketed better. fixed
13. Nice map since you mainly use simple rhythm. Fix your slider waves xD I kinda like my waves :c

[Normal]

1. The SV feels pretty fast for Normal... Well considering there's also an easy diff, i think it's fine, also the rythme is pretty easy for a normal
2. 00:03:770 (3,4,1) - usually I make it like this http://puu.sh/iXiVa/47b19df146.jpg so (3) blanketing (1)'s tail, while (1) blanketing (4) and making a nice triangle shape. But since I changed (3)'s shape, you might want to change 00:02:699 (1) - as well. fixed, differently though
3. 00:27:342 (3) - It would be nice if you move this downward a bit to make a smoother flow from (2) since the current flow is broken, but nah, it's minor, it's alright if you don't tho. Might give some DS trouble :c
4. 00:28:413 (1,2,1,2,3,1) - These seems off .-. Try to change 00:28:413 (1) - into a circle and move everything else up until 00:31:092 (1) - 1/1 tick forward then add circle here 00:31:628 to fill the gap. Should fit better. http://puu.sh/iXj9b/3884308316.jpg fixed
5. 00:50:378 (2,3) - Make these two identical? .-. or at least you could make (3) blanketing (2)'s head. fixed
6. 02:05:645 (5,1) - blanket~ fixed
7. 02:30:556 (3) - Would look better if you simply stack it with (2) imo http://puu.sh/iXjl3/83e52b2613.jpg fixed
8. 02:31:628 (1) - If you do so ^ you can stack this with (3)'s tail http://puu.sh/iXjnu/a0e80e6968.jpg the DS should be alright after that. did it in my own way
9. 02:46:628 (1) - Make it reverse here 02:47:029 and add a note at big white tick. http://puu.sh/iXjrF/1a2625e451.jpg fixed Actually nope, for rating's sake
10. 03:12:342 (1,2,3,4) - It feels weird because you are using the same pattern .-. maybe use different pattern from before? Like curving everything the other way? http://puu.sh/iXjxh/c170b3062e.jpg or whatever you like. taking that idea it's nice
11. 03:17:967 (2) - Personally I don't like this slider's shape xD i guess it can be improved, did some modifications but it's still the same though lol
12. 03:25:199 (1) - curve the other way so it could blanket (2)? http://puu.sh/iXjBk/25c3e5f144.jpg kinda ruin the flow from (4) tho :/ ye ok, i take that
13. 04:04:842 (1) - Remove NC, unnecessary. fixed
14. 04:08:056 (1) - ^ fixed

[Hard]

1. HP 5? sounds a bit too low
2. OD 6 same here, for both, I might put 5.5 or 6.5 if someone else complains about it i don't know lol
3. 02:00:824 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - I'd rather have it keep it's square shape but make it spin and maybe increase the jump a little.. I like how it ends up by a triangle
4. 02:03:770 (1,3) - Almost overlapped, don't look good imo, maybe move (3) a bit. fixed
5. 02:05:645 (4,1,2,3,4) - this looks like broken star shape :/ why don't make it into star shape? improved a bit the shape
6. 02:41:003 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Maybe make them spin... I kinda like the way it is now
7. 03:41:538 (2) - Make the start and the end parallel. fixed
8. Nice hard ^^

I'll end this here since my map is 5 mins long (the drain is 4 mins tho) with only two diffs, so I think this would be fair :3 yep yep sure
Cool song btw -w-
Good luck~^^

moonlightleaf wrote:

SPOILER

no kd , maybe no helpful ,

[Hard]

00:48:369 (3) - delete nah it's fine

01:45:020 (3,4) - maybe a little far it intensifies here it plays just fine

01:58:011 - no so fit after this to use just a spinner i think it does fit

02:45:556 (1) - strack ? custom stack always better

[insane]

00:40:467 and 00:40:735 add note ? not enough feedback

00:52:520 (3,4) - wrong 1/8 ,rhythm : 00:52:520 and 00:52:654 and 00:52:721 well you may have a point, but still, i'm just accentuate that part instead of the 1/4 that is less intensive

01:49:038 add note Not a note I want to map, that's not what I'm following

01:50:511 (1) - move to 01:50:712 ? Nope o.o mapping the beats here.

03:35:645 (1,1) - strack ? No, custom stack looks better IG.

Side wrote:

SPOILER

Hi my mod for M4M (hopefully :3).

Consider changing the preview point to 02:27:074 - Makes the preview a little longer and saa sounds really cool :3 I prefer a non-vocal preview point.


The background feels a little unfitting in my opinion. Obviously I'm not suggesting you change it however if you are open to other backgrounds let me know and I can show you a few that came to mind :3 I like it e.e But thanks!

Snow

Consider raising OD to 8.5. This is a 6 star extra and it should be a lot more rewarding than a harder insane/lower extra. Plus most people who can play this well have pretty good UR or at least should. fixed



00:41:270 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I understand that this is a slower section because it's a verse however this small section at 00:40:735 (3,1,1,1) - really builds up the tension in the next 16 bars. What I am suggesting is adding notes in the empty red ticks after each slider note combination (from thisto this and so on) so it can complement the previous build-up and also serve as a good transition to the prechorus that starts at 00:49:842 (1) - Nah. This part is barely more intense than 00:32:699 (1) - this one. I already add a circle compared to that one. the 1/8 kickslider are here to make a transition not to start something full 1/2 in any case

02:08:190 - 02:11:270 - I could see this section being mapped a lot more than having a break here. Or at the very least add some notes (sounds)on 02:08:190 - and 02:08:458 - and then have the break. IU wanted to map it but there's nothing to map in this section actually, that's why i put a break here. and if I map the sounds you suggest me, the empty ticks in between feel really awkward.

03:11:337 (2) - Could probably just stack it over the sliderhead. Otherwise standardize the spacing to 1.8x like you did for 03:13:614 (2,3) - I don't have prroblem here, I prefer lowering the sv to catch the slider in a better way, it doesnt change that much in gameplay anyway.

03:15:020 (3) - Triple here sounds overbearing considering there is also a triple note here 03:15:422 (5,6,1) - Consider changing slider 3 into 2 notes. Either that or get rid of 03:15:489 (6). This will probably mean rearranging some patterns but it sounds better. I changed hitsounds instead lol, the emphasize that gives the triple is ok i think.

Insane

If you changed the OD on the above diff consider changing this one to OD8. fixed


01:26:270 (1) - This is okay too but you could also consider adding a note here and then starting the spinner. fixed

03:00:422 (4) - ctrl up and ctrl left one time. Note should be at 484 | 64 so the pattern looks like a cleaner triangle while the spacing stays consistent. fixed

03:16:895 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - Something about this pattern makes it really offputting. Something about 03:17:297 (3) - doesn't feel right to me. The pattern I hear is 1 123 1 123 1 1 1 but the pattern I play is 1 123 123 123 1 1. It might look nice because its like a triforce triangle but I think you should consider a different pattern here maybe (just a rough example) something like this (2 is still a slider/reverse) Where in this pattern your fingers are doing like a more consistent tapping pattern (can't really explain it because I think it sounds confusing lol but its like a 12 - 12 1 -1 tapping lol if this doesnt make sense I'll try to clear it up here or in pm) I'm just cutting the stream I don't know :c Like your way sounds nice. But I like mine too, I don't know :c You're accentating the vocal while I just stick with the beats. Not sure what's better. I'll see if someone else mention it, i'll change it in your way.

03:30:556 (1,2,3) - Move these together to 268 / 176 so 4 5 and 6 flow more naturally to 1. The symmetry between 3 and 1 also stays like you can see here fixed


Didn't really see any issues on the easier diffs honestly. Maps are honestly very well made (no surprise lol) and I'd definitely play it even though I personally don't like omoi's vocaloid stuff that much

1. 00:01:627 - Add a note here maybe? There's a significant enough beat here for one.
2. 00:27:878 (3,1) - Blanket is a bit sloppy. ><
3. 01:28:145 - Missing a note for the vocal here~
4. 02:27:074 - Another missing note for vocal
5. 02:46:628 (3) - Curve this slider maybe? ><

1. 00:01:627 - Same as Easy; A note here maybe?

1. 00:01:627 - Note? ><
2. 00:23:056 (1,2,1,2) - This session of jumps are hard to see imo. ><
3. 01:45:556 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - These feel too far for a Hard map. ><
4. 04:04:842 (1,2,1,2) - Mentioned earlier. ><

1. 00:01:627 - Note? ><
2. 01:09:396 (2,4) - Ctrl G? o.o
3. 01:21:985 (1,2) - I think Copy-pasting (1) and then Ctrl H+J would be nice, it also makes it symmetrical~
4. 02:28:145 (4) - Ctrl G?

1. 00:01:627 - Note? ><
2. 00:17:431 (5) - Too low! It's touching the meter at the bottom. ><
3. 00:17:967 (2,4) - Ctrl G?
4. 01:11:538 (2) - Ctrl G?
5. 02:26:270 (1,1) - Also touching the meter at the bottom. Too low.
6. 02:27:074 (1,1) - Switch the direction of one of them? ><

Lasse wrote:

SPOILER

m4m from #modreqs

Insane

00:11:270 (1) - the jump from 20% to 70% hitsound volume is quite big, consider adding one or two other volume sections inbetween Well the music is pretty intense too
00:11:003 (3) - rotate the end of the slider a little bit more to the right I like this way
00:27:342 (1,2,3,4) - could use some hitsounding There's already some hitsounds right? Added a whistle though
00:32:364 (7,8,1) - angle between 7 and the slider is quite sharp, consider making it more like this Ok why not
00:34:842 (1) - seems to be a bit too far down, consider moving this and the pattern before a little bit upwards Well..it's not offscreen, that really doesn't bother me
==> 00:36:985 (1) - this is way better
00:45:556 (1) - again a bit too far down ^
00:50:645 (4) - 00:51:717 (4) - consider adding a whistle or sth to those there's already a clap on both
01:02:699 (1) - move to 104/76 or snap to 01:02:431 (5) - mhh, okay looks neater now'
01:18:503 (2) - could use whistle to fir the loud+high vocals there's a clap aready
01:26:806 - 70% hs volume here Nah, I understand what you mean with the point below too but 70 is for kiai-like, it's the max
01:27:342 - 80% here This would be the highest sound of the map, it's really not meant to be
01:58:413 (1) - 01:59:128 (1) - making those repeating 1/3 would make them fit the instrumental better, maybe even make 01:58:770 (1) - a single a single would be too confusing and the movement stays the same. the way i did just use more space on the screen.
02:46:628 (1,2) - those need some effects (whistle or sth) They already have some finish/clap/whistle
02:48:770 (1,2) - those maybe too Exactly same hitsounds
02:50:913 (1,3) - ^ ^
02:51:985 (1) - ^ ^
02:53:056 (1) - consider upping the hs volume at this point as it gets more intense Well, I could but to me, this is already at max 70% after that it doesn't fit with the music. Also it's the same part though.
03:01:628 (1) - have you considered putting a long slider or spinner here? ~ until before 03:03:770 might fit the drawn out instrumental thingy better Spin wouldn't fit. Slider... I might have think about it, I forgot but I think it would be meh. I prefer let the note 'resonate'
03:13:145 (4) - move to 160/92 or snap to end of 3 Nope, same style than 03:13:681 (2) -
03:13:681 (2) - move to 376/140 Nope cause the flow is way better here
03:14:552 (1) - consider ramping up the volume on this spinner in 1 or 2 steps The idea is cool, but the music doesn't actually get louder
03:16:895 (1) - 60% seems too low considering how loud the vocals are relative to other parts of the song I'm not mapping the vocal but the drums, I thought that was actually too loud
03:35:378 (1,1) - swap the hitsounds of those Actually removed claps and added whistles instead
03:38:056 (1) - this and many other of the long sliders that are mapped to the vocals could use some hitsounding But they have some hitsounds.. You mean on the whole slider? That would sound pretty bad to me. I'm following the voice but I'm mapping the music, that's a nuance.
03:51:985 (1) - maybe add a break. tbh it feels fine either way, lol No, not natural to finish on red tick, especially after a slider, i would use this technique on special occasion only and not here. It feels empty IMO.
04:11:003 (4) - whistle on the second repeat feels pretty random It is not. The drums are different in the music than the first slider.
04:13:413 there could probably be another note here, but it might piss people off ... Yes, I personally hate that last note after spinner xD.

plays nicely overall

nadapan wrote:

SPOILER

M4M from your modding queue

[Easy]

1. 01:02:431 (2,3) - Stacks like this one is not reccomended in Easy. People who just started playing osu will get confused when seing a stack. I think that stacks should be putten in Normal and diffs harder than normal. It's not recommended but it's fine. I think it's readable like it's neat enough and fits the music just fine.
2. 01:10:199 (2,3,1) - How about a triangle? It's already a triangle right?
3. 02:39:128 (3,4,1) - ^ Use the slider end of 3, the circle of 4 and slider head of 1 ^
4. 04:05:913 (3,4) - Blanket is off It's fine

[Normal]

1. 00:57:342 (3,4) - Blanket fixed
2. 01:43:145 (2,3) - ^ It's a copy paste of this 01:42:342 (1) - the pattern would be ugly with a blanket.
3. 02:50:645 (4,1,2) - Trangle? It is already.

[Hard]

1. 00:15:556 (1,3) - Stack is a bit off It is not

This was all I could find. Sorry for making it a small mod ;__;

This beatmap has a very nice flow (Even I who sucks at flow understands that the flow in this map is good)

Good luck with ranking

1. 00:09:128 (1,2) - Change To 1 Reverse Slider And A Note
2. 00:31:628 (3) - Flow Looks Weird For Me
3. 01:01:628 (3) - Maybe Move This A Bit. It May Confuse Beginner Because This Appear Right Where The Early Slider Ends.
4. 01:50:645 (3) - NC?
5. 02:27:342 (2) - NC?
6. 02:30:556 (3) - This Looks Better imo If It Is Same Shape With 02:28:413 (4)
7. 03:10:199 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Remap? This Is Boring :v
8. 03:18:770 - Downbeat Should Map With Something Clickable
9. 03:34:842 (1,2) - One Slider And 2 Notes?
10. 03:51:985 (1) - Change To 2/1 Slider

Deppyforce wrote:

YO From The Queue

Modding Normal Only Because Lazy Kinda Long Song.

[Normal]

1. 00:09:128 (1,2) - Change To 1 Reverse Slider And A Note The idea is pretty cool but I'd like to keep the single notes on the strong melody only for this part.
2. 00:31:628 (3) - Flow Looks Weird For Me I think it's ok
3. 01:01:628 (3) - Maybe Move This A Bit. It May Confuse Beginner Because This Appear Right Where The Early Slider Ends. I guess it's neater this way though..I don't know
4. 01:50:645 (3) - NC? I find the followpoint helpful here for beginners.
5. 02:27:342 (2) - NC? Yes, fixed.
6. 02:30:556 (3) - This Looks Better imo If It Is Same Shape With 02:28:413 (4) Good idea, but I like the wave too for some variety.
7. 03:10:199 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Remap? This Is Boring :v I don't find it boring, I find it cool. It's to train people to play big black really early rofl.
8. 03:18:770 - Downbeat Should Map With Something Clickable Well, this is normal diff, it would be awkward in a different way.
9. 03:34:842 (1,2) - One Slider And 2 Notes? Mh, I think the reverse fits pretty nice
10. 03:51:985 (1) - Change To 2/1 Slider Not enough feedback, I don't like it.

This Is Good Map, I Can't Find Much
But Hope That Helps Anyway :3

byfar wrote:

SPOILER

hi there o/ from your m4m queue

[General]

1. Hi, I'm sure this has already been mentioned but: I'd highly suggest a filler difficulty in between the Insane diff and Freeze diff. This is mainly because the insane diff pretty much consists of DS'ed 1/2 circles while on the other hand the Freeze diff is largly 224 bpm medium to large jumps. A player who can easily SS the Insane would likely not have the required aim and/or stamina to pass even half of Freeze, not to mention the intense density that occurs in the map with 1/4s, 1/4 sliders and 1/2 jumps later on in the map + AR 9.4 I'll add it only if someone is willing to make one..

[Freeze]

1. 
   00:53:056 (1,2,3) - Imo, you should make this part have a bit larger spacing. The intensity in this part is just as strong, if not stronger than the previous parts such as 00:49:842 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - where you used 2.10x~ spacing. I put (3) a bit more on the side yes.
2. 
   01:01:628 (1,2,3,1,2) - I find myself losing quite a bit of momentum at the 1/2 stack from the 1/4 slider into the 1/2 slow down here. Consider making these 01:01:895 (3,1) - more spaced out/ or convert into 1/2 slider?
   
   if you decide to make it more spaced out: try stacking this circle 01:02:029 (1) - onto the slider head of 01:01:092 (3) - and ctrl+g this slider: 01:02:163 (2) -
   
   example1

   
   This way the momentum build up by the previous 1/2 circles and 1/4 sliders isnt suddenly lost for no reason. I understand what you mean but I think I prefer the way it is now. I really want to show the transition in the music here so I really don't want to add a jump.
3. 
   01:27:208 (1) - I think you should get rid of the repeat and instead add a circle on the large white tick for better emphasis.
   Try moving the stream to somewhere here if you decide to change this: That would be the logic. But I like this way as well. I think the reverse gives just as much impact as a note here. And the stream would start way too far
   example2

   
   code for the stream

   356,273,86270,5,12,0:0:0:0:
   388,285,86337,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   424,285,86404,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   456,269,86471,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   480,245,86538,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   488,209,86605,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   476,177,86672,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   448,153,86739,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   416,137,86806,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   380,133,86873,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   344,141,86940,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   316,161,87007,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   284,177,87074,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   248,177,87141,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   214,165,87208,6,0,P|194:148|178:113,1,50
   149,38,87342,1,0,0:0:0:0:

4. 02:00:824 (2,3) - 02:03:770 (1,2,3,4) - Imo these areas flowed kinda awkwardly. Prolly because of the spacing but the flow is good here. Well, I don't mind change it but didn't come up with something better than that.
5. 03:51:985 (1) - this slowdown may be a little bit too sudden imo. Imagine how angry one would be breaking here after fcing the entire map ( Well... a 0.5x SV feels way too fast though.
   
   Rest of the map looks good!

[Insane]

1. 00:50:645 (4) - 00:51:717 (4) - consider making the ends clickable with a 3/4 + circle? Imo plays better this way. That's the logic as well but I'd like to follow the melody rather than the beats here.
   No other complaints about this diff. Solid diff!

Good luck!~

Thank you very much!

Secretpipe wrote:

Looking nice

Come[Back]Home wrote:

This is out of my range to mod. Im not used to mod such a high bpm D: >w<

Instead take my stars :3

Espeon wrote:

HP feels a bit high to me on freezing difficulty, I feel like 6.5-7 would be better

example:
00:32:699 (1) - 00:40:735 (3) - - it feels really easy to die in places like this due to the hp drain, not sure if this is what you intended though.

I don't really have any modding experience so feel free to ignore this, its just how it felt to me

amazing map btw, really really looking forward to it, it's so fun to play! (i die on the deathstreams though) other than that it feels so well made

caren_sk wrote:

nice mapping !

toybot wrote:

heyo, id be willing to map an extra to fill up the gap, since ive already mapped this badly once before ^-^

1. 01:01:628 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I think if you rotate the triple a bit you can make a better flow ~ e.g. http://i.imgur.com/GemOghw.png (rotate -35)
2. 01:17:431 (6,7) - Maybe ctrlg+g and move (7) a bit up?
3. 01:25:735 (2) - ctrl+g and a bit down would fit in the previous pattern but I see what you did there
4. 01:32:297 (1,2,3) - Make those a bit better curved? It could look a bit smoother
5. 02:34:172 (2,3) - fix blanket
6. 02:47:967 (2,3,4,5) - imo the flow is a bit harsh here - Maybe ctrl+g on (3) and reposition (4,5) and make (6) curved? http://i.imgur.com/vkl3UsH.jpg
7. 03:27:342 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - I feel like this has to be mapped differently
   03:27:342 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1) - FIrst part feels way to slow for the following jumps 03:29:351 (2,3,4,5) - I would try to map the vocals more since they're intensifying at that point (if that is a word :^) )
8. 03:59:217 (4,1) - I would use a triple like before
9. 04:06:315 (3) - overmapped? I cant hear it

Domi200 wrote:

Hey <3

[Extra]

1. 01:01:628 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I think if you rotate the triple a bit you can make a better flow ~ e.g. http://i.imgur.com/GemOghw.png (rotate -35) Actually the flow I made is the one I wanted. I think it plays pretty good to go a bit on a straight line but you know...not to much neither lol
2. 01:17:431 (6,7) - Maybe ctrlg+g and move (7) a bit up? fixed, good point.
3. 01:25:735 (2) - ctrl+g and a bit down would fit in the previous pattern but I see what you did there Ye, not a bad idea, but then 01:26:003 (3) - would be a bit random.
4. 01:32:297 (1,2,3) - Make those a bit better curved? It could look a bit smoother Might be true, but then it would have a bad overlap with 01:31:092 (3,4) - and that wouldn't fit my style
5. 02:34:172 (2,3) - fix blanket fixed
6. 02:47:967 (2,3,4,5) - imo the flow is a bit harsh here - Maybe ctrl+g on (3) and reposition (4,5) and make (6) curved? http://i.imgur.com/vkl3UsH.jpg Honestly, I found the flow pretty good, but I really like your idea, so I took it anyway lol
7. 03:27:342 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - I feel like this has to be mapped differently
   03:27:342 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1) - FIrst part feels way to slow for the following jumps 03:29:351 (2,3,4,5) - I would try to map the vocals more since they're intensifying at that point (if that is a word :^) ) Fixed a bit the first part, but the second is I think good this way, the back and forth pattern is pretty fast, and when the vocal intensifies, I cut it so it gives even more impact, I think
8. 03:59:217 (4,1) - I would use a triple like before It wasn't a triple :O 03:55:199 (1) -
9. 04:06:315 (3) - overmapped? I cant hear it Well it is for the sake of playability

Hope I could help a bit out :>

Good luck

ReFaller wrote:

Hi, I'm for your mod req.
There is only one thing in which I can help, is it a little logy offset, which imo should be in 1615

Trent83 wrote:

[Random short mod] (you theft my idea xDD) The map is a year old though..
I only mod this because i love mod and this song (and i am mapping it xDD)

Rules and Notes:
-I give notes for the diffs
-If your map are too good, the kudo you give me i will gonna throw to your map
-If you need faqs or advices PM on osu!.exe :3
-*WARNING* Marked - Optional
[General]

SPOILER

Put another combo colors in the kiai times hurt the eyes of the new players Would be cool if you would have specify which color should be changed. But I just (re)testplayed it 0% dim with osu default skin and it's just fine (not to mention that even a new player can play at 25% dim something like that I think).
00:11:270 (4) - Offset goes here :3 The way it is now is exactly the same as what you're pointing out since i's a downbeat. I didn't put it here because I want to map the part before xD

[Easy]

SPOILER

[Compose]
Aimod- Why the fu** you have a lot of kiai problems in aimod? are only 3!? please fix this Can't be fixed. It's because of the fountains (that doesn't really need to be nerfed here tbh.)

00:15:556 (3) - Use that beat doesnt end sliders there and here 00:16:628 (4) - and here 00:17:699 (2) - you can use mor sliders and circles for that beats or here 00:25:199 (4) - and here, well you have a lot of problems with this beats, if you want i can put any single beat you have this error if you want PM in osu.exe I think it's just fine... I have nothing to add as it is playable, the flow feels natural and it follows in the music what I want... Not sure what's your problem, my Easy isn't that different comapred to other sets.

00:29:485 (2) - Why? this? erase it or put more sliders Listen closely to the music and you'll hear that it's following th same sound as 00:28:413 (1) -
00:30:824 (3) - This looks ugly and its overlapped and end in a strong beat "looks ugly" is really subjective, why is it ugly? and this shape is pretty popular overall. Also, it's an Easy diff mapped on 1/1 really high BPM (so I tried to mapped it as it was half BPM) it's obvous that some sliders will end on strong beats.
00:49:842 (1,2,3,4) - This is are A LOT OF CIRCLES for an easy Ye well, it's a square!
00:57:342 (1) - Fix this, looks really ugly Once more your point is really subjective. Why is it ugly? Anyways, I went for a regualr waveshaped as I don't really mind here.
01:03:770 (1) - use 2 sliders, because this ends in strong beat Yes, on purpose, it's an easy high bpm, I don't want to overdo it.
01:11:270 (1) - This is a really good slider, but ends in strong beat fix this and here 01:13:413 (3) - and here ._. 01:17:699 (3) - why you continue doing this!? 01:19:842 (1) - i'am gonna kill you! 01:21:985 (3) - Well, as I told you on previous point. I have to do this in order to make it playable for new players as an Easy (on the same bpm, try to not make the star rating goes higher than 1.50 without doing that! (Little recall, higher than 1.50, the diff becomes a Normal, no more an Easy). On easy and normal difficulties, you don't have to map every sound, it's just approximative, and the downbeats are what's easier to play in this game as it is...well a strong beat so easy for everyone to spot.
01:26:270 (3) - The strong beat thing I could add a note on this one as there is a little break after but I think the reverse gives a great feedback of the way I perceive the music here
01:30:556 (1) - STRONG BEATS!! ~nope
01:32:699 (3) - fix this! nope~~

Okay, men you gonna make me cry
This easy is so bad structurated I think you don't know yet how an easy is supposed to be mapped, especially for a high bpm song tbh.
men learn a little more of strong beats
well i think you catch the idea of the Strong Beats DONT END SLIDERS THERE!!! Please... on Easy it's just fine to do it. I'd say it's even a good thing as the rythme becomes really easy.
your map needs more work for rank I'll suppose you just checked the easy diff, if you check for example the Freeze diff, you'll see that no sliders aare ending on downbeat (except when I want to!!)
Here you are doing an unrank map It's not.
Here is the note
Note: F That's sad man


Consider remap the easy diffbecause have A LOT of strong beat errors in compose so, learn a little more, if you doesnt catch the idea of the strong beats thing PM in osu!.exe if you wanna a full mod edit the easy diff and i will mod the else see ya! I can't believe that someone actually had the guts to tell me to remap a full diff after mapping a noisy music of more than 4 minutes SIX TIMES (from easy to Freeze, thanks to ranking criteria with their broken star ratings). Not to mention that the easy is just fine for that matter, that's not the diff I like the least in this set for sure.

Okoratu wrote:

well when we're talking about easy
maybe you should consider a few minor points about it
01:01:628 (1,2,3) - 03:17:699 (1,2) - these are the only rhythms in 4 min of play time of your map that require the player to click 1/1 notes, the rest is entirely built around 2/1, it would make more sense with the entire concept of the map if you somehow simplified these more Kinda fixed the second one the best I could... And for the first one I don't know I find it too strong to not map it...

the rest is your comboing being a bit messy for my tastes but i can imagine you making up reasoning for each of them so discussing that seems useless

in freeze i'd urge you to reconsider the 1/3 you basically invented in the beginning as well as 1/6 extends like 04:09:128 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - i think 3/4 sliders work just as well and they are effectively way more common than what you're doing so they're a bit more predictable as 3/4 sliders imo. Changed first part for 1/2. Kinda liked the way they played but well.. About the 1/6 I actually changed them for 1/8, no way they;re 1/4. I wanted to put them 1/8 from the start but I found easier to play it with 1/6... And since the begnining was 1/3 it was a recall. But now they're 1/8 it's not like a big premiere anymore.

Dono027 wrote:

SPOILER

Bon, alors mod en fr ^^

[Insane]

00:16:628 (1) - Fais un jump un poil plus grand afin d'éviter l'overlap Mais j'aime bien l'orverlap!

00:28:413 (1,2) - Garde le même patterne mais tente de faire une blanket, ca rendera peut être plus sympathique ^^ Je prefere comme ca pour le coup, toutes les diffs ont ce genre de pattern et c'est ce qui fait pour moi la singularite du set xD

00:29:485 (1,2) - Même chose ici Ici y a pas de probleme pour le coup je pense, c'est pas un blanket, c'est meme pas centre

00:51:449 (3,1) - Tente de faire une blanket C'est assez comme c'est

01:00:556 (1,3) - Overlap qui rend le moment pas très joli, mets tes deux slider de manière a ce qu'ils soient parallèles. Ils sont toujours pas paralleles mais fix l'overlap, ok

01:05:913 (1,3) - Refais les côtés de ta blanket, et si ce n'est pas une blanket, fais en une. fixed un poil pas la peine que ce soit un blanket de la mort qui tue en mode slider arc de cercle etc. Je trouve ca degoutant.

01:13:815 (2,3) - Le jump est peut être un peu extrême pour un moment comme ca ou le joueur a besoin de pas mal de concentration. J'aime beaucoup le flow ici

01:24:128 (1,2) - Evite de stacker, voire même fais un jump. Aucun probleme avec le stack ici, ca rend les choses beaucoup plus facile et le flow est cool

01:26:270 (1) - Redescend un peu le cercle, car c'est limite au niveau de la grille :/ Mais en gameplay y a pas de soucis

01:30:288 (4,1) - Ta blanket parait un peu bizarre, si tu peux réctifie un peu J'ai deplace un tout petit peu mais ce sera jamais parfait

01:31:628 (1,2) - Fait une blanket je pense avoir fixed un petit peu

01:38:190 (2,3,4) - Evite les stack jumpés comme ca, ca rend le cercle 4 très difficile a repérer, change de patterne ou déplace un peu le cercle 4 pour qu'il soit plus visible. Mais j'aime bien ^^

01:49:038 - Ajoute un cercle Je pourrais mais c'est pas ce que je veux suivre ici

02:43:681 (1,1) - Enlève les New Combos No way

03:12:878 (3,4,1,2) - Rythme très dur a repérer pour le joueur Nah ca passe

03:35:110 (1,1,1) - Enlève les New Combos No way!

Voila :3
Bonne chance pour ta map !

Merci bien!

Chiyuyu wrote:

SPOILER

hi

[Insane]

00:52:520 (3,4) - i think it http://puu.sh/n3ZRu/a64f580ff9.jpg would be more appropriate ( or http://puu.sh/n3ZSR/d4fdad0b71.jpg ) I know what you mean but what I'm following is clearly not some 1/4 beats

01:30:556 (1) - make it more smooth ( http://puu.sh/n401S/986839b908.jpg ) fixed it a bit (as much as I could) good point!

02:43:681 (1,1,1) - maybe http://puu.sh/n40ao/ee94e98b3d.jpg ? Not a bad idea but I prefer mine here ^^

03:16:895 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - http://puu.sh/n40i5/2d65c1f4b0.jpg so more suitable for music The triple on white tick doesn't sound that great to me.

04:08:057 (1) - make it more smooth fixed a bit

00:25:200 (1,2) - http://puu.sh/n40uU/e200b47e02.jpg ? I take it ^^

01:10:601 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - maybe 01:11:270 (1) - place like this? http://puu.sh/n40HG/6d160bf3ae.jpg Ok!

[Extra]

00:04:842 (1) - place the object slightly above the slider http://puu.sh/n40OR/ea06de9484.jpg fixed a bit I think o.o

00:15:556 (1) - place like this? http://puu.sh/n40SD/d9451c07c2.jpg Nah I don't like the overlap here and I actually really like this pattern probably the only one on this diff rofl

00:27:878 (5,6,7,8,1) - http://puu.sh/n40Wy/627993af55.jpg fixed a bit ><

00:49:976 (2,3,4,1,2) - make it look like a star http://puu.sh/n410L/25e7920575.jpg Not a bad point at all but right it feels more like a circle and I like it

00:52:520 (1,2) - i think it http://puu.sh/n3ZRu/a64f580ff9.jpg would be more appropriate ( or http://puu.sh/n3ZSR/d4fdad0b71.jpg ) Same as previous diff

02:35:913 (1) - move down http://puu.sh/n41zX/96e36c0527.jpg fixed, good point

02:53:994 (1) - I personally do not like sliders that go in a straight line but it is a matter of taste fixed a tiny bit



good luck

Thank you very much!

-Nishiki- wrote:

Ayy m4m
Green:Stylistic
Blue:Opinion
Red:Neccessary

Freeze

00:03:770 (1) - This would be better if it was vertically flipped. I disagree, the flow wouldn't be that great and if I flipp vertical the whole pattern would feel unbalanced as it is like the basis of 00:02:699 (1,2,3,4) -
00:11:003 (1) - Set this to 1/8 instead of 1/4,like at01:46:092 (3). But the rhythme in the music is totally different though! (I wanted to put 1/8 tbh, but it would be overmapped).
00:11:270 (1,2) - This shouldn't really stack with the sliders. Why that?
00:12:342 (1) - This would sound better if it were a finish. There's already a finish
00:13:949 (4) - Maybe split this into two beats. It's already 2 beats. You mean 2 circles? I'm just following the melody here, the beats arent as strong as 00:14:485 (1) - here
00:14:485 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - These should arrange in a square formation. Why?
00:15:556 (1) - Hit finish? There's already a finsh
00:16:360 (5,6) - These beats would be better if in a horizontal pattern like at 00:15:824 (2,3). I think both ways are cool
00:16:628 (1) - Hitfinish. There's already one
00:17:699 (1) - ^ ^
00:18:971 (2) - Delete this beat and move 00:19:038 (3) farther from the slider. Why? The rythme sounds cool to me
00:28:413 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,1,1,2,1,2,3,4,5) - I feel this would be better as a few streams with some kicksliders,like this: Would be overmapped and would actually kill the real music that intensifies here 00:32:163 (1) -
Note that this is a bad example and that you can do much better than what I did.
00:40:869 (1,1,1) - I would make these beats instead of kicksliders. Why? I think they represent pretty well how the music gets nervous
00:48:636 (5) - This should be deleted. Why? There's crearly a beat
00:49:842 (1) - Put this into the square,kick 00:50:378 (5) out of that square,add a New Combo,and give 00:50:378 (5) to the triangle shape at 00:50:511 (1,2,3) to make it a square.Something like this. The suggestion isn't bad but I really make my way as I think it looks neat and fits the music just great
00:51:985 (1,2,3,4) - Turn this into a square shape. Not a bad idea but I don't want bad overlaps on my map. So meanwhile 00:52:119 (2,3) - are going parallel to 00:51:717 (4) -
00:55:065 (7) - Put this farther from the other circle. Why? The music feels stopped so no need to create a unwanted movement just because.
01:25:199 (4) - NC this and remove the NC at 01:25:467 (1). Why? I think I'm correct here The music intensify here 01:25:467 (1) -
01:26:806 (1) - NC here. Looks better without, the NC would kinda show a new NC that isn't existant so I don't want to put one
01:28:145 (1) - This could have a hitsound attached to it. There's a clap
01:28:413 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - These would sound better with finishes attached to them. They have finishes, each on them.
01:37:253 (2,3,2,3,2,3,2,3,2,3,2,3) - Kinda red but mostly blue,but these shouldn't overlap. Can you explain why? I think those patterns are a big + to the map as they're original and fit the song. Why shall it be almost necessary to you?
01:57:699 (1) - This seems a whole lot better if it were put at 01:57:878 and lengthened to two markers on the 1/3 base,like this: I disagree I'm just following the music here
02:05:378 (1) - This would be better if it were a slider like at 02:05:645 (2). Rhythme is the same though!
02:23:592 (1) - NC. For the same reason as above, I don't like the NC that much here

That's it.Good luck with the rank!

-Nishiki- wrote:

I should also mention that moving the preview point should be moved to 01:27:878.It seems more fitting than the current preview point.