Clipped
Eliza can do that.abraker wrote:
If it can carry a convo and sustain a relationship better than most matches on dating apps, why not?
Brainrot. Literally can't see themselves with a real woman.octovore_shobon wrote:
funny how yall talk about anime girl-like androids before anything else
Brainrot. Literally can't see themselves with a real woman.thats what i thought, like, women exist and anime girls are just an eastern cartoony representation of women
Real life people are not perfect. Neither in personality nor in appearance.octovore_shobon wrote:
Brainrot. Literally can't see themselves with a real woman.thats what i thought, like, women exist and anime girls are just an eastern cartoony representation of women
nothing is perfect in real life, their problem if they can't handle thatBehrauder wrote:
Real life people are not perfect. Neither in personality nor in appearance.octovore_shobon wrote:
Brainrot. Literally can't see themselves with a real woman.thats what i thought, like, women exist and anime girls are just an eastern cartoony representation of women
This is the main difference.
embarassing post as fuckBehrauder wrote:
Real life people are not perfect. Neither in personality nor in appearance.octovore_shobon wrote:
Brainrot. Literally can't see themselves with a real woman.thats what i thought, like, women exist and anime girls are just an eastern cartoony representation of women
This is the main difference.
niat0004 wrote:
In general, I think you would be better off aiming for human romantic partners, though AI robotics do have other creative use cases.
I thought of this instead.Tateshina Eve wrote:
Would this count?
xch00F wrote:
embarassing post as fuckBehrauder wrote:
Real life people are not perfect. Neither in personality nor in appearance.octovore_shobon wrote:
Brainrot. Literally can't see themselves with a real woman.thats what i thought, like, women exist and anime girls are just an eastern cartoony representation of women
This is the main difference.
𝙴𝚛𝚖, 𝚍𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑? 𝙸 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚔 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝'𝚜 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚘𝚙𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚊𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐.octovore_shobon wrote:
thats what i thought, like, women exist [...]
basement dwellerSerraionga wrote:
Eliza couldn't carry on a sentence like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she triedKarmine wrote:
Eliza can do that.abraker wrote:
If it can carry a convo and sustain a relationship better than most matches on dating apps, why not?
You set the bar at "matches on dating apps" which is much lower than GPT from what I've seen.abraker wrote:
Eliza couldn't carry on a sentence like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she triedKarmine wrote:
Eliza can do that.abraker wrote:
If it can carry a convo and sustain a relationship better than most matches on dating apps, why not?
I dunno, I think `M-x doctor` mode in Emacs is a descendant of Eliza, if I'm not mistaken, and it can kinda sorta carry on a conversation.abraker wrote:
Eliza couldn't carry on a sentence like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she triedKarmine wrote:
Eliza can do that.abraker wrote:
If it can carry a convo and sustain a relationship better than most matches on dating apps, why not?
Well only one way to find out if it's date material. Ask it if it would still chat with you if you were a worm.MistressRemilia wrote:
I dunno, I think `M-x doctor` mode in Emacs is a descendant of Eliza, if I'm not mistaken, and it can kinda sorta carry on a conversation.abraker wrote:
Eliza couldn't carry on a sentence like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she triedKarmine wrote:
Eliza can do that.abraker wrote:
If it can carry a convo and sustain a relationship better than most matches on dating apps, why not?
Noreu wrote:
im just gonna send this and leave
goodbye
I really like the llama response.abraker wrote:
Well only one way to find out if it's date material. Ask it if it would still chat with you if you were a worm.MistressRemilia wrote:
I dunno, I think `M-x doctor` mode in Emacs is a descendant of Eliza, if I'm not mistaken, and it can kinda sorta carry on a conversation.abraker wrote:
Eliza couldn't carry on a sentence like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she tried like chat gpt even if she triedKarmine wrote:
Eliza can do that.abraker wrote:
If it can carry a convo and sustain a relationship better than most matches on dating apps, why not?
Obviously chat GPT has some game but is pretty eh
llama is going places but much of a blabbermouth
jenny is just the westernized version of hatsune mikuNoreu wrote:
im just gonna send this and leave
goodbye
DID YOU JUST SAYKaaruumii wrote:
jenny is just the westernized version of hatsune mikuNoreu wrote:
im just gonna send this and leave
goodbye
I'm still traumatized by THAT video.Noreu wrote:
im just gonna send this and leave
goodbye
cmon jenny is hotgreat_elmo wrote:
I'm still traumatized by THAT video.
That is all I will say.
But I'm already desperate enough so yes.
Ik she is but I'm referring to THAT one video of her.octovore_shobon wrote:
cmon jenny is hotgreat_elmo wrote:
I'm still traumatized by THAT video.
That is all I will say.
But I'm already desperate enough so yes.
woule fuck jenny with engine oiloctovore_shobon wrote:
cmon jenny is hotgreat_elmo wrote:
I'm still traumatized by THAT video.
That is all I will say.
But I'm already desperate enough so yes.
fuck thats an awesome idea but everyone here is a toddler so its over alreadyroufou wrote:
imagine how awkward an OT dating show would be
its an OT event idea.Achromalia wrote:
idk how awkward it would be when the answer is always "...i don't know you" or "i'm not interested in seeing anyone" or "so when do we eat" or "anyway i just want to listen to people talk" or a random "philosophical" monologue or a random "philosophical" dialogue
speaking for myself, i suppose
i feel like that's not gonna happen oftenShinRun wrote:
“Yo wanna fuck”
“Bet”
“Fr fr”
it is! that was me not overthinking it, it was a very simple answer to give without taking much thought at all :> which was sort of what i meant to illustrate to begin with, in that it would not be that awkward because there is very little for me to care for being awkward aboutPolyspora wrote:
its an OT event idea.Achromalia wrote:
idk how awkward it would be when the answer is always "...i don't know you" or "i'm not interested in seeing anyone" or "so when do we eat" or "anyway i just want to listen to people talk" or a random "philosophical" monologue or a random "philosophical" dialogue
speaking for myself, i suppose
dont overthink it
wouldEspionage724 wrote:
Unless you make the robot all parts and code, you'd just be dating someone else's rulebook.
BDSM sounds like less steps :p- Marco - wrote:
wouldEspionage724 wrote:
Unless you make the robot all parts and code, you'd just be dating someone else's rulebook.
What if it comes factory-coded for this?Espionage724 wrote:
BDSM sounds like less steps :p- Marco - wrote:
wouldEspionage724 wrote:
Unless you make the robot all parts and code, you'd just be dating someone else's rulebook.
Why use someone else's rulebook on rust instead of entertaining the person who wrote it? They might have more creativity than they coded :pMistressRemilia wrote:
What if it comes factory-coded for this?Espionage724 wrote:
BDSM sounds like less steps :p- Marco - wrote:
wouldEspionage724 wrote:
Unless you make the robot all parts and code, you'd just be dating someone else's rulebook.
we could just as easily assume a counterpoint in that something executed by a robot may just as easily be more effective in the implementation of that creativity than the writer of its code, if we're at such a point where dating someone's rulebook so-to-speak is a viable option :oEspionage724 wrote:
Why use someone else's rulebook on rust instead of entertaining the person who wrote it? They might have more creativity than they coded :pMistressRemilia wrote:
Espionage724 wrote:
Unless you make the robot all parts and code, you'd just be dating someone else's rulebook.- Marco - wrote:
wouldEspionage724 wrote:
BDSM sounds like less steps :p
What if it comes factory-coded for this?
If I was considering dating a robot, it'd be way cooler to DIY the whole ordeal :p If I was at that kind of point, I probably wouldn't have another person factored in. And with the idea that I can do stuff better than other people, a robot covers a lot more chances to show it off while being practical for the intended uses :p Who knows what I want more than myself?Achromalia wrote:
we could just as easily assume a counterpoint in that something executed by a robot may just as easily be more effective in the implementation of that creativity than the writer of its code, if we're at such a point where dating someone's rulebook so-to-speak is a viable option :oEspionage724 wrote:
Why use someone else's rulebook on rust instead of entertaining the person who wrote it? They might have more creativity than they coded :pMistressRemilia wrote:
Espionage724 wrote:
Unless you make the robot all parts and code, you'd just be dating someone else's rulebook.- Marco - wrote:
wouldEspionage724 wrote:
BDSM sounds like less steps :p
What if it comes factory-coded for this?
or maybe the intention was to demonstrate that this doesn't exist at this capacity beyond the user's own creativity/imagination? unsure... but then again, i imagine this is not really based on practical implementation so much as the hypothetical premise where you could reasonably expect to be satisfied with dating a robot, or something similar
Eh I like posting quips every now and then, but usually not too seriously; and also like reading responses to em :p (I was definitely joking about that TV series length being equal to anything statistical but it was a convenient point)Achromalia wrote:
...why am i adding to a conversation i don't care about...? am i really that bored? i almost posted an essay in response to another one of your comments elsewhere in off-topic on the plane-crash rarity thing and whatever its representation in media would/wouldn't necessarily signal, before erasing it and realizing how much i was writing for something other people likely wouldn't invest any thought into :sob:
understandable :) i think i'm losing the plot now and i'm unsure whether the contexts expanded even more than what i had been accounting for with creativity/satisfaction in direct interactions with either creation or creatorEspionage724 wrote:
If I was considering dating a robot, it'd be way cooler to DIY the whole ordeal :p If I was at that kind of point, I probably wouldn't have another person factored in. And with the idea that I can do stuff better than other people, a robot covers a lot more chances to show it off while being practical for the intended uses :p Who knows what I want more than myself?Achromalia wrote:
Espionage724 wrote:
Why use someone else's rulebook on rust instead of entertaining the person who wrote it? They might have more creativity than they coded :pwe could just as easily assume a counterpoint,in that something executed by a robot may just as easily be more effective in the implementation of that creativity than the writer of its code, if we're at such a point where dating someone's rulebook so-to-speak is a viable option :o
or maybe the intention was to demonstrate that this doesn't exist at this capacity beyond the user's own creativity/imagination? unsure... but then again, i imagine this is not really based on practical implementation so much as the hypothetical premise where you could reasonably expect to be satisfied with dating a robot, or something similar
Buying a robot with someone else's AI as the brain sounds odd, and likely more limited than the person who coded the behavior. And if it's internet-connected, my goodness that's a whole different territory of weird having mics and cams hooked up to logistics for something you're dating.
mm, from what i remember, i think my premise was going to be that even as a point of convenience, there may not really necessarily be any reliable equivalence found between the rarity of an event with its publicity in entertainment, since any reported extent of an event's existence can be examined by a given creator and used as a subject to represent when creating [art/music/films], reaching wider audiences regardless of an event's conventional significance or rarity. both extremely [trivial/mundane/realistic/common] and extremely [significant/fantastical/fictional/rare] events can be used as subjects for artistic representation regardless of these relationships so long as they can be conceived or narrativized or given significance by that creator, and audiences will connect with each work differently in ways that may also add/enhance that sense of significance independently from the actual rarity/significance of the event or subject itselfEspionage724 wrote:
Eh I like posting quips every now and then, but usually not too seriously; and also like reading responses to em :p (I was definitely joking about that TV series length being equal to anything statistical but it was a convenient point)Achromalia wrote:
...why am i adding to a conversation i don't care about...? am i really that bored?i almost posted an essay in response to another one of your comments elsewhere in off-topic on the plane-crash rarity thing and whatever its representation in media would/wouldn't necessarily signal, before erasing it and realizing how much i was writing for something other people likely wouldn't invest any thought into :sob: