forum

the fuck happened

posted
Total Posts
26
Topic Starter
xch00F
like 87% of the threads on this first page of the forums are locked
Winnyace
abraker is just locking threads that are just ultra low effort, like no thought behind them, whatsoever.
Wimpy Cursed
I'm as low as a broken branch of a family tree.
abraker
initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
Winnyace

abraker wrote:

initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
Fuck off.
DM FOR MUTUAL

abraker wrote:

initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
Why not just lock all of them
JustABeginner

abraker wrote:

initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
abraker becoming like Death.
Kobold84

abraker wrote:

initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
Necropost 50 threads and lock them. There, 100% lock rate.
DM FOR MUTUAL

Kobold84 wrote:

abraker wrote:

initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
Necropost 50 threads and lock them. There, 100% lock rate.
Just give me the word and I'll do it
Polyspora

Winnyace wrote:

abraker wrote:

initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
Fuck off.
I think you’re the embodiment of everything that’s wrong with this subforum nowadays
reffty_gag
abraker being abraker i guess...
sametdze

Winnyace wrote:

abraker wrote:

initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
Fuck off.
not trying to hate but cmon you really gonna take 90 "do you think *insert famous person who obviously doesn't even know what osu is* played osu" followed by a "did he" on the front page? that would make a really garbage and boring OT, at least to me.
reffty_gag

sametdze wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

abraker wrote:

initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
Fuck off.
not trying to hate but cmon you really gonna take 90 "do you think *insert famous person who obviously doesn't even know what osu is* played osu" followed by a "did he" on the front page? that would make a really garbage and boring OT, at least to me.
I'm ok if that kind of thread cuz its boring, trash, and repetitive. But the other thread ? That's kinda unfair to lock them imo
sametdze

reffty_gag wrote:

sametdze wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

abraker wrote:

initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
Fuck off.
not trying to hate but cmon you really gonna take 90 "do you think *insert famous person who obviously doesn't even know what osu is* played osu" followed by a "did he" on the front page? that would make a really garbage and boring OT, at least to me.
I'm ok if that kind of thread cuz its boring, trash, and repetitive. But the other thread ? That's kinda unfair to lock them imo
yoony's one was sehr guht therefore shouldn't have been locked
Topic Starter
xch00F

abraker wrote:

initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
dunno if it's actually 87% I just scrolled down and saw a bajillion locks
Farfocele

Winnyace wrote:

abraker is just locking threads that are just ultra low effort, like no thought behind them, whatsoever.
honestly, not opposed
abraker

Kobold84 wrote:

abraker wrote:

initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
Necropost 50 threads and lock them. There, 100% lock rate.
This is exactly why included "legitimate"
Serraionga
Abraker The Madman

personally i think it was really funny seeing it happen because abraker is actually tame as fuck compared to what stefan and This Guy Who Shall Not Be Named used to do here lol
Corne2Plum3
Imagine if abraker locks 100% of threads in the front page O_O

user3412
abraker is saving off topic from being boring and repetitive
i guess this means no more metas
Farfocele

user3412 wrote:

abraker is saving off topic from being boring and repetitive
i guess this means no more metas
this is pretty good actually
user3412

Farfocele wrote:

user3412 wrote:

abraker is saving off topic from being boring and repetitive
i guess this means no more metas
this is pretty good actually
I agree
RoksNRoll

user3412 wrote:

abraker is saving off topic from being boring and repetitive
i guess this means no more metas
abraker ftw?!?
Patatitta

user3412 wrote:

abraker is saving off topic from being boring and repetitive
i guess this means no more metas
not really as they only really lock after the meta is over
abraker

Patatitta wrote:

user3412 wrote:

abraker is saving off topic from being boring and repetitive
i guess this means no more metas
not really as they only really lock after the meta is over
due to quantum uncertainty patattitata observes that some locks are made after the meta was over, but the thread locking causality theorem suggests that meta was over because locks were made
tapperruiii
the real locked posts was the global moderators we made along the way
Please sign in to reply.

New reply