like 87% of the threads on this first page of the forums are locked
Fuck off.abraker wrote:
initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
Why not just lock all of themabraker wrote:
initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
abraker becoming like Death.abraker wrote:
initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
Necropost 50 threads and lock them. There, 100% lock rate.abraker wrote:
initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
Just give me the word and I'll do itKobold84 wrote:
Necropost 50 threads and lock them. There, 100% lock rate.abraker wrote:
initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
I think you’re the embodiment of everything that’s wrong with this subforum nowadaysWinnyace wrote:
Fuck off.abraker wrote:
initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
not trying to hate but cmon you really gonna take 90 "do you think *insert famous person who obviously doesn't even know what osu is* played osu" followed by a "did he" on the front page? that would make a really garbage and boring OT, at least to me.Winnyace wrote:
Fuck off.abraker wrote:
initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
I'm ok if that kind of thread cuz its boring, trash, and repetitive. But the other thread ? That's kinda unfair to lock them imosametdze wrote:
not trying to hate but cmon you really gonna take 90 "do you think *insert famous person who obviously doesn't even know what osu is* played osu" followed by a "did he" on the front page? that would make a really garbage and boring OT, at least to me.Winnyace wrote:
Fuck off.abraker wrote:
initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
yoony's one was sehr guht therefore shouldn't have been lockedreffty_gag wrote:
I'm ok if that kind of thread cuz its boring, trash, and repetitive. But the other thread ? That's kinda unfair to lock them imosametdze wrote:
not trying to hate but cmon you really gonna take 90 "do you think *insert famous person who obviously doesn't even know what osu is* played osu" followed by a "did he" on the front page? that would make a really garbage and boring OT, at least to me.Winnyace wrote:
Fuck off.abraker wrote:
initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
dunno if it's actually 87% I just scrolled down and saw a bajillion locksabraker wrote:
initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
honestly, not opposedWinnyace wrote:
abraker is just locking threads that are just ultra low effort, like no thought behind them, whatsoever.
This is exactly why included "legitimate"Kobold84 wrote:
Necropost 50 threads and lock them. There, 100% lock rate.abraker wrote:
initially I was hoping to lock every thread, but I found out it's pretty hard to achieve a legitimate 100% lock rate on first page. 87% is pretty high still. Maybe you guys should lay off the fat and post healthier.
this is pretty good actuallyuser3412 wrote:
abraker is saving off topic from being boring and repetitive
i guess this means no more metas
I agreeFarfocele wrote:
this is pretty good actuallyuser3412 wrote:
abraker is saving off topic from being boring and repetitive
i guess this means no more metas
abraker ftw?!?user3412 wrote:
abraker is saving off topic from being boring and repetitive
i guess this means no more metas
not really as they only really lock after the meta is overuser3412 wrote:
abraker is saving off topic from being boring and repetitive
i guess this means no more metas
due to quantum uncertainty patattitata observes that some locks are made after the meta was over, but the thread locking causality theorem suggests that meta was over because locks were madePatatitta wrote:
not really as they only really lock after the meta is overuser3412 wrote:
abraker is saving off topic from being boring and repetitive
i guess this means no more metas