pretty please <3
forum
petition to make off topic posts count as posts
posted
Total Posts
53
yes
Total votes: 36
i mean off topic posts are still posts so yeah let them count
Off-topic.
nah let it the way it is we have to hide or true power to gr people
Anaxii would have 21,667 posts count
Topic Starter
how much would death have?Lyawi wrote:
Anaxii would have 21,667 posts count
Not much more.Polyspora wrote:
how much would death have?Lyawi wrote:
Anaxii would have 21,667 posts count
agree but also:
Karmine wrote:
Removing post count entirely would be better.
but why
Only if it is shown separately, just below the posts outside it, as in my script. Putting everything together would be problematic...
Most posts on OT have more substance than the majority of her 14k non OT posts.Lyawi wrote:
Anaxii would have 21,667 posts count
YES PLEASE I NEED TO GAIN POSTS FOR THE LEADERBOARD
don't post farm in ot wtf
Petition to make petitions count as posts.
Views from a single user count multiple times now I think. Don't know what the cooldown is though.Hydreigon wrote:
257 views in 6 hours but only 18 votes hm..
still a weird change, especially now they have to implement a cooldown to it, making it not accurate at all to how many times a user views the threadKarmine wrote:
Views from a single user count multiple times now I think. Don't know what the cooldown is though.Hydreigon wrote:
257 views in 6 hours but only 18 votes hm..
Proof?Karmine wrote:
Views from a single user count multiple times now I think. Don't know what the cooldown is though.Hydreigon wrote:
257 views in 6 hours but only 18 votes hm..
I've just noticed that views tend to go up by 1 when I click a thread I've already seen for the first time in a while, even if I just refreshed the forum page. It's unlikely to be a coincidence, especially considering all threads suddenly got more views than they used to without getting more activity.Kobold84 wrote:
Proof?Karmine wrote:
Views from a single user count multiple times now I think. Don't know what the cooldown is though.Hydreigon wrote:
257 views in 6 hours but only 18 votes hm..
some of us are really shy okay?Hydreigon wrote:
257 views in 6 hours but only 18 votes hm..
Maybe people without account add to view counts? (I don't know honestly)B0ii wrote:
some of us are really shy okay?Hydreigon wrote:
257 views in 6 hours but only 18 votes hm..
You're right. Just tested it on a dead thread.Karmine wrote:
I've just noticed that views tend to go up by 1 when I click a thread I've already seen for the first time in a while, even if I just refreshed the forum page. It's unlikely to be a coincidence, especially considering all threads suddenly got more views than they used to without getting more activity.Kobold84 wrote:
Proof?Karmine wrote:
Views from a single user count multiple times now I think. Don't know what the cooldown is though.Hydreigon wrote:
257 views in 6 hours but only 18 votes hm..
Jangsoodlor
what do you mean, they do count as posts
users/2024727/posts
I can see all of my off topic posts here just fine
users/2024727/posts
I can see all of my off topic posts here just fine
i think my posts would unironically quadruple in size
No. There is no reason for this subforum to get even more ludacris with post count farmers and begin farming addictions because people see number go up and get dopamin fixed.
this isn't an attack towards you at all I just find this particular typo to be incredibly fucking funny lmaoBlushing wrote:
ludacris
XD this is what homophones does to people, rip, but I will keep said typo because why notxch00F wrote:
this isn't an attack towards you at all I just find this particular typo to be incredibly fucking funny lmaoBlushing wrote:
ludacris
ludicrous***
imo if a word is used correctly but spelled incorrectly it's not a problem at all and people who get mad about typos kinda suck ass. but it's really funny to consider someone using "ludicrous" properly because of this dude lmaoBlushing wrote:
XD this is what homophones does to people, rip, but I will keep said typo because why notxch00F wrote:
this isn't an attack towards you at all I just find this particular typo to be incredibly fucking funny lmaoBlushing wrote:
ludacris
ludicrous***
my dumbass misread this as homophobes, i was like goddamnBlushing wrote:
XD this is what homophones does to peoplexch00F wrote:
this isn't an attack towards you at all I just find this particular typo to be incredibly fucking funny lmaoBlushing wrote:
ludacris
WYSIxch00F wrote:
what do you mean, they do count as posts
users/2024727/posts
I can see all of my off topic posts here just fine
two airplanes have crashed into the world trade centerCorne2Plum3 wrote:
WYSIxch00F wrote:
what do you mean, they do count as posts
users/2024727/posts
I can see all of my off topic posts here just fine
Topic Starter
auugh remi was enoughxch00F wrote:
two airplanes have crashed into the world trade centerCorne2Plum3 wrote:
WYSIxch00F wrote:
what do you mean, they do count as posts
users/2024727/posts
I can see all of my off topic posts here just fine
And who the fuck are voting no and why?Jun Maeda wrote:
Who the fuck are voting for yes
now that I think about it I do not want any post farmers in this precious subforum
so no
so no
if post counted to post count in OT, people would farm it as they farmed it in GD or whatever, so there would be a lot more spam in OTCorne2Plum3 wrote:
And who the fuck are voting no and why?Jun Maeda wrote:
Who the fuck are voting for yes
Topic Starter
thats just a hypothesis :skull:B0ii wrote:
now that I think about it I do not want any post farmers in this precious subforum
so no
I am one of them and I do it because your little previous OT will be filled with bullshit. You should know that, considering you're a fucking GMT.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
And who the fuck are voting no and why?Jun Maeda wrote:
Who the fuck are voting for yes
i don't think ppl are willing to be honest with themselves and admit what someone's post count implies on a dedicated message board. there's this kinda default assumption that a larger post count equals a "more important" person, perhaps even a "more passionate" person, that whatever you post holds inherently more weight because the number under your username says you've made thousands of posts on a message board that's dedicated primarily to discussing one thing. at the end of the day if you want posts in off-topic to pad your post count you're really just saying you want to stroke your ego. if you don't think people would spam with insincere low effort shit just to raise their post count number you don't know how the internet works and that insincere low effort shit always sucks ass to wade thru
But we banned chainposting so it wouldn't be as bad.Patatitta wrote:
if post counted to post count in OT, people would farm it as they farmed it in GD or whatever, so there would be a lot more spam in OTCorne2Plum3 wrote:
And who the fuck are voting no and why?Jun Maeda wrote:
Who the fuck are voting for yes
Also even without posts counting here the post farmers are so braindead they post farm in OT too.
there are more ways to post farm other than chainpost, shoutout to that "post lyrics of songs" where anaxii and lostsilver had 500 posts eachKarmine wrote:
But we banned chainposting so it wouldn't be as bad.Patatitta wrote:
if post counted to post count in OT, people would farm it as they farmed it in GD or whatever, so there would be a lot more spam in OTCorne2Plum3 wrote:
And who the fuck are voting no and why?Jun Maeda wrote:
Who the fuck are voting for yes
Also even without posts counting here the post farmers are so braindead they post farm in OT too.
holy shitPatatitta wrote:
there are more ways to post farm other than chainpost, shoutout to that "post lyrics of songs" where anaxii and lostsilver had 500 posts eachKarmine wrote:
But we banned chainposting so it wouldn't be as bad.Patatitta wrote:
if post counted to post count in OT, people would farm it as they farmed it in GD or whatever, so there would be a lot more spam in OTCorne2Plum3 wrote:
And who the fuck are voting no and why?Jun Maeda wrote:
Who the fuck are voting for yes
Also even without posts counting here the post farmers are so braindead they post farm in OT too.
Topic Starter
guys PLEASE stop posting on this thread, its trash PLÉASE PLEASE PLAEASE4 go to my car thread i BGUEG YOU
we just need to update our current rules to reflect that then. easyPatatitta wrote:
there are more ways to post farm other than chainpost, shoutout to that "post lyrics of songs" where anaxii and lostsilver had 500 posts each
OT does not have a big community, everyone's names and avatars are recognizable to some extent so seeing someone trying to post count for the sake of post counting becomes really really obvious
i don't count xD on posts counting here ever happening though, mostly because it feels like something that would have to go through peppy/some other stubborn dev. but it's good to dream