Off-topic.
how much would death have?Lyawi wrote:
Anaxii would have 21,667 posts count
Not much more.Polyspora wrote:
how much would death have?Lyawi wrote:
Anaxii would have 21,667 posts count
Karmine wrote:
Removing post count entirely would be better.
Most posts on OT have more substance than the majority of her 14k non OT posts.Lyawi wrote:
Anaxii would have 21,667 posts count
Views from a single user count multiple times now I think. Don't know what the cooldown is though.Hydreigon wrote:
257 views in 6 hours but only 18 votes hm..
still a weird change, especially now they have to implement a cooldown to it, making it not accurate at all to how many times a user views the threadKarmine wrote:
Views from a single user count multiple times now I think. Don't know what the cooldown is though.Hydreigon wrote:
257 views in 6 hours but only 18 votes hm..
Proof?Karmine wrote:
Views from a single user count multiple times now I think. Don't know what the cooldown is though.Hydreigon wrote:
257 views in 6 hours but only 18 votes hm..
I've just noticed that views tend to go up by 1 when I click a thread I've already seen for the first time in a while, even if I just refreshed the forum page. It's unlikely to be a coincidence, especially considering all threads suddenly got more views than they used to without getting more activity.Kobold84 wrote:
Proof?Karmine wrote:
Views from a single user count multiple times now I think. Don't know what the cooldown is though.Hydreigon wrote:
257 views in 6 hours but only 18 votes hm..
some of us are really shy okay?Hydreigon wrote:
257 views in 6 hours but only 18 votes hm..
Maybe people without account add to view counts? (I don't know honestly)B0ii wrote:
some of us are really shy okay?Hydreigon wrote:
257 views in 6 hours but only 18 votes hm..
You're right. Just tested it on a dead thread.Karmine wrote:
I've just noticed that views tend to go up by 1 when I click a thread I've already seen for the first time in a while, even if I just refreshed the forum page. It's unlikely to be a coincidence, especially considering all threads suddenly got more views than they used to without getting more activity.Kobold84 wrote:
Proof?Karmine wrote:
Views from a single user count multiple times now I think. Don't know what the cooldown is though.Hydreigon wrote:
257 views in 6 hours but only 18 votes hm..
this isn't an attack towards you at all I just find this particular typo to be incredibly fucking funny lmaoBlushing wrote:
ludacris
XD this is what homophones does to people, rip, but I will keep said typo because why notxch00F wrote:
this isn't an attack towards you at all I just find this particular typo to be incredibly fucking funny lmaoBlushing wrote:
ludacris
imo if a word is used correctly but spelled incorrectly it's not a problem at all and people who get mad about typos kinda suck ass. but it's really funny to consider someone using "ludicrous" properly because of this dude lmaoBlushing wrote:
XD this is what homophones does to people, rip, but I will keep said typo because why notxch00F wrote:
this isn't an attack towards you at all I just find this particular typo to be incredibly fucking funny lmaoBlushing wrote:
ludacris
ludicrous***
my dumbass misread this as homophobes, i was like goddamnBlushing wrote:
XD this is what homophones does to peoplexch00F wrote:
this isn't an attack towards you at all I just find this particular typo to be incredibly fucking funny lmaoBlushing wrote:
ludacris
WYSIxch00F wrote:
what do you mean, they do count as posts
users/2024727/posts
I can see all of my off topic posts here just fine
two airplanes have crashed into the world trade centerCorne2Plum3 wrote:
WYSIxch00F wrote:
what do you mean, they do count as posts
users/2024727/posts
I can see all of my off topic posts here just fine
auugh remi was enoughxch00F wrote:
two airplanes have crashed into the world trade centerCorne2Plum3 wrote:
WYSIxch00F wrote:
what do you mean, they do count as posts
users/2024727/posts
I can see all of my off topic posts here just fine
And who the fuck are voting no and why?Jun Maeda wrote:
Who the fuck are voting for yes
if post counted to post count in OT, people would farm it as they farmed it in GD or whatever, so there would be a lot more spam in OTCorne2Plum3 wrote:
And who the fuck are voting no and why?Jun Maeda wrote:
Who the fuck are voting for yes
thats just a hypothesis :skull:B0ii wrote:
now that I think about it I do not want any post farmers in this precious subforum
so no
I am one of them and I do it because your little previous OT will be filled with bullshit. You should know that, considering you're a fucking GMT.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
And who the fuck are voting no and why?Jun Maeda wrote:
Who the fuck are voting for yes
But we banned chainposting so it wouldn't be as bad.Patatitta wrote:
if post counted to post count in OT, people would farm it as they farmed it in GD or whatever, so there would be a lot more spam in OTCorne2Plum3 wrote:
And who the fuck are voting no and why?Jun Maeda wrote:
Who the fuck are voting for yes
there are more ways to post farm other than chainpost, shoutout to that "post lyrics of songs" where anaxii and lostsilver had 500 posts eachKarmine wrote:
But we banned chainposting so it wouldn't be as bad.Patatitta wrote:
if post counted to post count in OT, people would farm it as they farmed it in GD or whatever, so there would be a lot more spam in OTCorne2Plum3 wrote:
And who the fuck are voting no and why?Jun Maeda wrote:
Who the fuck are voting for yes
Also even without posts counting here the post farmers are so braindead they post farm in OT too.
holy shitPatatitta wrote:
there are more ways to post farm other than chainpost, shoutout to that "post lyrics of songs" where anaxii and lostsilver had 500 posts eachKarmine wrote:
But we banned chainposting so it wouldn't be as bad.Patatitta wrote:
if post counted to post count in OT, people would farm it as they farmed it in GD or whatever, so there would be a lot more spam in OTCorne2Plum3 wrote:
And who the fuck are voting no and why?Jun Maeda wrote:
Who the fuck are voting for yes
Also even without posts counting here the post farmers are so braindead they post farm in OT too.
we just need to update our current rules to reflect that then. easyPatatitta wrote:
there are more ways to post farm other than chainpost, shoutout to that "post lyrics of songs" where anaxii and lostsilver had 500 posts each
Polyspora wrote:
guys PLEASE stop posting on this thread, its trash PLÉASE PLEASE PLAEASE4 go to my car thread i BGUEG YOU
No need to update rules tbh that kind of thing is the reason Forum Games exists and posts there don't count.Serraionga wrote:
we just need to update our current rules to reflect that then. easyPatatitta wrote:
there are more ways to post farm other than chainpost, shoutout to that "post lyrics of songs" where anaxii and lostsilver had 500 posts each
OT does not have a big community, everyone's names and avatars are recognizable to some extent so seeing someone trying to post count for the sake of post counting becomes really really obvious
i don't count xD on posts counting here ever happening though, mostly because it feels like something that would have to go through peppy/some other stubborn dev. but it's good to dream
Hehe one more post.Polyspora wrote:
guys PLEASE stop posting on this thread, its trash PLÉASE PLEASE PLAEASE4 go to my car thread i BGUEG YOU
Haha.Polyspora wrote:
guys PLEASE stop posting on this thread, its trash PLÉASE PLEASE PLAEASE4 go to my car thread i BGUEG YOU