at least they taste good thoYmir wrote:
Peaches aren't that great of a fruit.
show more
I was misslead (corne was also in the chat)
But even so, there's still a trial to decide.
Second of all, the people must also play their part in the president's decisions so that we always find a balance between what he wants and what we want. Without that, it would be hell basically
Parliament not being elected is clearly the worst offense here.
Also considering the constitution was never really enforced and was made at a time when OT was very different it makes no sense to start enforcing it now.
Example of that is the oath, if the constitution was made today it wouldn't be a thing and no one actually cares about it, some dude just dug it up with the intention of abusing it to go against the result of rightful elections.
All in all if there is a trial it will be in bad faith.
"it wouldn't be a thing" is not actually true. You don't know for certain if it would or would not be a thing. The oath is in place and it's a duty of the president to upkeep it. It's not hard.
This guy is just biased and I am quite tired of explaining things
So y’all can just go fuck yourselves lol
this shit goes hard
we live in a society frfr
Having a wave of new denizen just before elections has been done before too so that's not really new.
really at this point the newer people who fit these requirements are more so underway or almost there on being denizen
plus its so much better having a more active person on OT in the parliament rather than a denizen that just comes and go from time to time
also it was a tie in 5th-6th place between Ymir and Blushing, and similar to me and reyalp back then tying for the 4th slot, potato man chose blushing over ymir, so technically, there was a bit of bias too it
so yeah
-
-
-
no one said yes to adding him sadge
I was misslead (corne was also in the chat)
I do agree with this.Ymir wrote:
Peaches aren't that great of a fruit.
Not much.[ Rynn ] wrote:
at least they taste good thoYmir wrote:
Peaches aren't that great of a fruit.
I like peaches
I don't care about all these, can you impeach him for being a vegetable?
Topic Starter
It's one of the president's duties to know the constitution. Ignorantia juris non excusat.Patatitta wrote:
I was misslead (corne was also in the chat)
But even so, there's still a trial to decide.
I'm peach.Ymir wrote:
I don't care about all these, can you impeach him for being a vegetable?
WOOHOO PUT ME IN CHARGE I'LL DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING BUT ASK FOR HUGS
FINALLY I CAN VOTE FOR SOMEONE THAT HAS THE SAME PRESIDFENT PHILOSOPHY AS MEColdTooth wrote:
WOOHOO PUT ME IN CHARGE I'LL DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING BUT ASK FOR HUGS
First of all, even if he wanted to, he would never be able to initiate a real dictatorship in this place because of he's helped by the government who also have to play their part in the systemDM FOR MUTUAL wrote:
this is why democracy is bad patatitta should've immediately seized as much power as he could and established a dictatorship
Second of all, the people must also play their part in the president's decisions so that we always find a balance between what he wants and what we want. Without that, it would be hell basically
so this election was rigged?
YIPPEEE!!!ColdTooth wrote:
WOOHOO PUT ME IN CHARGE I'LL DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING BUT ASK FOR HUGS
Counterpoint: former government didn't even know there was a constitution and are now trying to use it against the current government.Kobold84 wrote:
It's one of the president's duties to know the constitution. Ignorantia juris non excusat.Patatitta wrote:
I was misslead (corne was also in the chat)
But even so, there's still a trial to decide.
Parliament not being elected is clearly the worst offense here.
Also considering the constitution was never really enforced and was made at a time when OT was very different it makes no sense to start enforcing it now.
Example of that is the oath, if the constitution was made today it wouldn't be a thing and no one actually cares about it, some dude just dug it up with the intention of abusing it to go against the result of rightful elections.
All in all if there is a trial it will be in bad faith.
Topic Starter
I fail to see how the former government is using that against the current government. Jang was never in the government in the first place, not to mention there was no former government. Eblf acted on his own during his term, everyone posing as the parliament or the government during that period were all simple denizens acting on behalf of the president. Which is unconstitutional, mind you.Karmine wrote:
Counterpoint: former government didn't even know there was a constitution and are now trying to use it against the current government.Kobold84 wrote:
It's one of the president's duties to know the constitution. Ignorantia juris non excusat.Patatitta wrote:
I was misslead (corne was also in the chat)
But even so, there's still a trial to decide.
Parliament not being elected is clearly the worst offense here.
Also considering the constitution was never really enforced and was made at a time when OT was very different it makes no sense to start enforcing it now.
Example of that is the oath, if the constitution was made today it wouldn't be a thing and no one actually cares about it, some dude just dug it up with the intention of abusing it to go against the result of rightful elections.
All in all if there is a trial it will be in bad faith.
"it wouldn't be a thing" is not actually true. You don't know for certain if it would or would not be a thing. The oath is in place and it's a duty of the president to upkeep it. It's not hard.
I want to make an annoucement that if I ever lose presidenship before my term finishes I want scyla to be next
Topic Starter
It's actually possible.Patatitta wrote:
I want to make an annoucement that if I ever lose presidenship before my term finishes I want scyla to be next
OT Constitution wrote:
XXXV. In case of the removal, death, resignation, or inability to perform duties of the President, the OTParliament may appoint an officer who shall act as president until the inability is removed or a new president is elected.
Then if it happens, who's going to be the president?Kobold84 wrote:
It's actually possible.Patatitta wrote:
I want to make an annoucement that if I ever lose presidenship before my term finishes I want scyla to be nextOT Constitution wrote:
XXXV. In case of the removal, death, resignation, or inability to perform duties of the President, the OTParliament may appoint an officer who shall act as president until the inability is removed or a new president is elected.
Topic Starter
The one who is appointed by the parliament to act his place. Could be anyone, really.his everything wrote:
Then if it happens, who's going to be the president?Kobold84 wrote:
It's actually possible.Patatitta wrote:
I want to make an annoucement that if I ever lose presidenship before my term finishes I want scyla to be nextOT Constitution wrote:
XXXV. In case of the removal, death, resignation, or inability to perform duties of the President, the OTParliament may appoint an officer who shall act as president until the inability is removed or a new president is elected.
The OT!Parliament will therefore have to organize mini-elections between them to decide who will replace the president who represents an entire nation...Kobold84 wrote:
The one who is appointed by the parliament to act his place. Could be anyone, really.his everything wrote:
Then if it happens, who's going to be the president?Kobold84 wrote:
It's actually possible.Patatitta wrote:
I want to make an annoucement that if I ever lose presidenship before my term finishes I want scyla to be nextOT Constitution wrote:
XXXV. In case of the removal, death, resignation, or inability to perform duties of the President, the OTParliament may appoint an officer who shall act as president until the inability is removed or a new president is elected.
Pls no, i was kiddingPatatitta wrote:
I want to make an annoucement that if I ever lose presidenship before my term finishes I want scyla to be next
It doesn't explicitly state that it has to be someone elseKobold84 wrote:
The one who is appointed by the parliament to act his place. Could be anyone, really.his everything wrote:
Then if it happens, who's going to be the president?Kobold84 wrote:
It's actually possible.Patatitta wrote:
I want to make an annoucement that if I ever lose presidenship before my term finishes I want scyla to be nextOT Constitution wrote:
XXXV. In case of the removal, death, resignation, or inability to perform duties of the President, the OTParliament may appoint an officer who shall act as president until the inability is removed or a new president is elected.
WHAT? OUR PRESIDENT? our president did acts like this?? THERE IS NO WAY, THIS IS INHUMAN.
I was gone for like 8 hours because of school work and I missed this!?
I wonder who is going to be the "officer" in question...Karmine wrote:
It doesn't explicitly state that it has to be someone elseKobold84 wrote:
The one who is appointed by the parliament to act his place. Could be anyone, really.his everything wrote:
Then if it happens, who's going to be the president?Kobold84 wrote:
It's actually possible.Patatitta wrote:
I want to make an annoucement that if I ever lose presidenship before my term finishes I want scyla to be nextOT Constitution wrote:
XXXV. In case of the removal, death, resignation, or inability to perform duties of the President, the OTParliament may appoint an officer who shall act as president until the inability is removed or a new president is elected.
He was never my president anyway. I obey only My Queen
We’re not lmaoKobold84 wrote:
I fail to see how the former government is using that against the current government.Karmine wrote:
Counterpoint: former government didn't even know there was a constitution and are now trying to use it against the current government.Kobold84 wrote:
It's one of the president's duties to know the constitution. Ignorantia juris non excusat.Patatitta wrote:
I was misslead (corne was also in the chat)
But even so, there's still a trial to decide.
Parliament not being elected is clearly the worst offense here.
Also considering the constitution was never really enforced and was made at a time when OT was very different it makes no sense to start enforcing it now.
Example of that is the oath, if the constitution was made today it wouldn't be a thing and no one actually cares about it, some dude just dug it up with the intention of abusing it to go against the result of rightful elections.
All in all if there is a trial it will be in bad faith.
This guy is just biased and I am quite tired of explaining things
So y’all can just go fuck yourselves lol
Topic Starter
So uh…
Every impeachable offense has now been corrected. The president Patatitta is now free of all charges against him.
Every impeachable offense has now been corrected. The president Patatitta is now free of all charges against him.
You still haven't charged him for being a literal spud. Do you job, matey.
crazy plot twistKobold84 wrote:
So uh…
Every impeachable offense has now been corrected. The president Patatitta is now free of all charges against him.
this shit goes hard
So now what about the trial for previous gov so we can revert everything they did?
Jangsoodlor
man. this role play thing went for far too long. i want my brainless posts back
you can still do themKatouMegumi wrote:
man. this role play thing went for far too long. i want my brainless posts back
ok nerdPatatitta wrote:
you can still do themKatouMegumi wrote:
man. this role play thing went for far too long. i want my brainless posts back
But this whole thing is brainless posts.KatouMegumi wrote:
man. this role play thing went for far too long. i want my brainless posts back
you should check blitzfrog posts back in the day lmaoKarmine wrote:
But this whole thing is brainless posts.KatouMegumi wrote:
man. this role play thing went for far too long. i want my brainless posts back
So kobold, if the consistution says that only denizen should be allowed in the election, then why are we allowing a non denizen in the parliament. why should he have the voting power? decisions seems quite biased here
but when i do it they call the psychologistKatouMegumi wrote:
man. this role play thing went for far too long. i want my brainless posts back
we live in a society frfr
Topic Starter
It only mentions denizens participating in the president elections. For parliament elections, there's nothing.Manishh wrote:
So kobold, if the consistution says that only denizen should be allowed in the election, then why are we allowing a non denizen in the parliament. why should he have the voting power? decisions seems quite biased here
This is crazy fr
lmao you know its a loophole right? Damn we are really going to allow it jeezKobold84 wrote:
It only mentions denizens participating in the president elections. For parliament elections, there's nothing.Manishh wrote:
So kobold, if the consistution says that only denizen should be allowed in the election, then why are we allowing a non denizen in the parliament. why should he have the voting power? decisions seems quite biased here
We allowed a gov with no elections so yeah I don't think that's a problem.Manishh wrote:
lmao you know its a loophole right? Damn we are really going to allow it jeezKobold84 wrote:
It only mentions denizens participating in the president elections. For parliament elections, there's nothing.Manishh wrote:
So kobold, if the consistution says that only denizen should be allowed in the election, then why are we allowing a non denizen in the parliament. why should he have the voting power? decisions seems quite biased here
Having a wave of new denizen just before elections has been done before too so that's not really new.
of course government will allow something which benefit them lol
No one complained about the last gov...Manishh wrote:
of course government will allow something which benefit them lol
plus there were restrictions on who can or can not participate in the parliament elections too:Karmine wrote:
We allowed a gov with no elections so yeah I don't think that's a problem.Manishh wrote:
lmao you know its a loophole right? Damn we are really going to allow it jeezKobold84 wrote:
It only mentions denizens participating in the president elections. For parliament elections, there's nothing.Manishh wrote:
So kobold, if the consistution says that only denizen should be allowed in the election, then why are we allowing a non denizen in the parliament. why should he have the voting power? decisions seems quite biased here
Having a wave of new denizen just before elections has been done before too so that's not really new.
so people such as zain, qwt and Mr Asian didnt fit the requirements, but blushing was able to fit the billPatatitta wrote:
The only requirement for voting or participating in this thread is to have been active for at least 3 months in the past 12 months. So this means, appearing on OT every 3-4 days for 3 months straight over the span of a year, in the case of any edge case, it would be brought up in this thread and discussed.
There are NO denizenship requirement
really at this point the newer people who fit these requirements are more so underway or almost there on being denizen
plus its so much better having a more active person on OT in the parliament rather than a denizen that just comes and go from time to time
also it was a tie in 5th-6th place between Ymir and Blushing, and similar to me and reyalp back then tying for the 4th slot, potato man chose blushing over ymir, so technically, there was a bit of bias too it
so yeah
what do you mean potato man chose blushing, didnt you had a vote?
Both reyalp and I said yes to adding Hydreigon and Blushing.Manishh wrote:
what do you mean potato man chose blushing, didnt you had a vote?
why not ymir? and why reylph was chosen over hydre?Karmine wrote:
Both reyalp and I said yes to adding Hydreigon and Blushing.Manishh wrote:
what do you mean potato man chose blushing, didnt you had a vote?
i have replaced monke. i am monke nowManishh wrote:
what do you mean potato man chose blushing, didnt you had a vote?
Manishh wrote:
why reylph was chosen over hydre?Karmine wrote:
Both reyalp and I said yes to adding Hydreigon and Blushing.Manishh wrote:
what do you mean potato man chose blushing, didnt you had a vote?
correction on last post, the president and the parliament as well votes on and gets to choose who wins the tiebreaker.Patatitta wrote:
and there was a tie between hydreigon and reyalp, so I chose who won
-
-
-
Manishh wrote:
why not ymir?
no one said yes to adding him sadge
Of course no one voted for them lol, they want them to agree with him. Karmine being literally is like potato man boy friend and reyalp be like skibidi. I wonder what gonna change now
Is this even English, I don't understand a word of this shit.Manishh wrote:
Of course no one voted for them lol, they want them to agree with him. Karmine being literally is like potato man boy friend and reyalp be like skibidi. I wonder what gonna change now
you gotta be the chosen oneTad Fibonacci wrote:
Is this even English, I don't understand a word of this shit.Manishh wrote:
Of course no one voted for them lol, they want them to agree with him. Karmine being literally is like potato man boy friend and reyalp be like skibidi. I wonder what gonna change now
I wish 😔Manishh wrote:
Karmine being literally is like potato man boy friend