Listen to there issues, If the issues are not even real, I will just ignore it. But if they have good points. I will work on it.burgernfat wrote:
During your time as president, if someone started producing propaganda that is targeted against you, how would you react?
1 time in a monthKobold84 wrote:
An important question for candidates.
How often do you shower?
--------------------------Below are replies to others------------------------------
You lost my vote right thereCorne2Plum3 wrote:
Kobold84 wrote:
What do you think about a recent addition of Blushing to denizens? Would you revert it if you become a president?
You are not understanding how far he is from the rules. The stated requirement is 8 Months & 20 Pages of OT PostsAsian Warlord wrote:
You’re not telling me what the requirements is.
- An achievement of some sort. Sure we can say he is active for like 8months if you consider just 1 page of post can show all the post he made in 1month or 2 month.
As an idea, I have never chainposted and nor have did shitposting just to farm numbers, Like on shitpost thread or memorizing the number of pie thread. I dont reply on half of the thread in OT!(Out of 30thread in 1 page, I have hardly reply on 10) but still I have 6000posts in OT! in 2years.
There is point in removing him. Its not about if he deserve the denizenship or not. Its about, There was a mistake made, we are just fixing itAsian Warlord wrote:
But at the same time removing him would be pointless because he is still going to get denizenship whenever he does hit the requirement. I’m not sure if gen 10 is gonna end soon if so, if he doesn’t meet the requirement this gen then just move him to the next gen like what corne saidPatatitta wrote:
I think it was 8 months on continuous activity + an actual big contribution to OT.Asian Warlord wrote:
You’re not telling me what the requirements is.
Hydreigon wrote:
I do have some concrete plans for denizenship such as:Manishh wrote:
Discuss? Don't you have any solid plans for it? just like most of us here. Other than inactive candidates. Parliament is same for the past 2 year or i say past 2 president year. Clearly nothing happened or changed in there time. How are you expecting things to change with you becoming president?
the shorter wait time
the ban of requesting for denizenship
the change of requirements
I still would give either a Yes or No on which ruling gets passed, its just that i want discussion with the new government so that i can have a more second opinion on it, so that i can see what else can be tinkered, and if the changes can be right and fair while still giving the prestige of one receiving the denizenship title
and yeah, new election for VP and a month after, new election for parliamentas stated above, another separate election would be held afterwards for the role of Vice President, as for why the need, ...well why not? the government has been really inactive and rather not doing much during my time back and from remarks of other people, and more denizens now active, surely the addition of another wouldnt hurt? and as stated before, the VP can sort act as a more if ever the case of the president dying to cringe, then the current VP would immediately take the role of president and it would be there choice of either, continuing the VP role and electing a new VP or abolishing it.Manishh wrote:
So, you know there is a chance of you becoming inactive and the chances of it happening is not small, Since, thats why you are adding a whole new role. How will the candidate to get the role will be decided? By you? By election?. Why need a vice president role when there is a parliament with 4 members in it?
There is also other plans i make for the VP role, they can act as a more second in command, being able to make and orders similar to the president, with just now needing the president official permission on accepting so.Wasn't the requirements of denizenship part of your complainys to the system and one of the reasons why you made OTEra's?Patatitta wrote:
yeah hydreigon doesn't really solve anything, again, changing the denizen requirement is NOT a solution and just adding more roles wont fix innactivity at the higher levels
also one thing i want to add is that, i'll try to make it so that the changes to denizenship require arent fully the same with your OTEra system, that way both can exist as separate titles
though i think for you it wouldnt matter as you, as you would most likely abolish the denizenship system or sort of merge the ruling with OTEra's
As for the roles, while i cant fix the disease of inactivity, but i can counter it and make the government somewhat alive, such as giving a ruling where all if a government member even the president isnt active for atleast 1-2 months, then they get automatically kicked out and there roles being replaced, that way, it can somewhat help in making the government active without leaving inactive members in the government.
Also the ruling or one to request leaving the government (though im pretty sure this already exists)
so yeah...
Hydreigon, nor the denizenship or the requirement of active month and x amount of post are the problem. The problem is not applying them consistently. These rules were never even applied on denizen above Gen8. And right now these rules are not getting applied. Thats the issue. You being there for 2nd opinion is the biggest shit I have heard in a while. YOU ARE THE PRESIDENT, YOU ARE THE ONE TO HAVE 1ST OPINION. Parliament is suppose to give you 2nd opinion and give you advice. OT! need change and a big one. All the effort abraker have put in till yet, the same amount of effort need to put in OT again and in just a year. You are not even saying "I will be active"