Glitter
00:08:264 (3,4,5,1) - Inconsistent with previous spacings, these ones are a lot smaller compared to stuff like 00:02:617 (3) - and 00:05:440 (3) -
00:10:382 (1) - These jumps don't really emphasise any specific sounds, they just get bigger. eg. 00:10:911 (3,4) - is bigger than the last ones without much extra
00:11:617 (8) - should really map the drums here
00:13:205 (1,2,3) - Using really wide angles like this isn't great for normal flow
00:13:911 (3) - Vocals are mostly 1/2, but are mapped with sliders which only emphasise half of them, whereas 00:15:499 (4) - has one vocal held sound and is circle jumps. Should really be swapped.
00:16:029 (1) - This slider doesn't look nice, just use a normal S shaped one like 01:12:499 (1) -
00:16:558 (2,3,4) - same thing about wide angle flow, doesn't work well here
00:16:911 (4) - You can't click the higher note which is at 00:17:264 (5) - , which emphasises it less. Change to just circles
00:17:440 (1) - guitar is on the slider tail, change rhythm so it's clickable
00:20:264 (1) - This finish uses the exact same spacing compared to the other circles, increase for proper emphasis
00:21:499 (4,5,1) - just use a normal stack
00:22:911 (3) - Should map vocal here because there's an "a" sound here
00:39:146 (2) - ^
00:24:499 (1) - This would look a lot better if it was curved
00:26:087 (2,3) - spacing too small here
00:34:911 (4,5,1) - Use normal stack, cursor has to really slow down to hit this properly
00:35:440 (2,1) - More important sounds need larger spacing, just make sure that most finishes use larger spacing than other parts.
00:42:676 (6,1) - This doesn't flow
00:48:146 (1,1) - Needs larger spacing for important part here
00:49:205 (3) - Map piano like you did before other chorus
00:53:264 (6) - This would look better if curved to the right
00:56:264 (4) - ^
00:56:793 (1) - Slider body is undreadable here, just use something a little more normal
00:56:793 (1,2) - why spacing so small
00:57:676 (4,1) - same thing about spacing, larger for important parts
00:59:440 (5,6,1) - 6,1 shouldn't be smaller for better flow
01:04:382 (5,6) - check rhythm here, doesn't follow vocals well because slider tail on important sound
01:05:264 (1,2,3,4) - nice pattern here
01:06:676 (1) - slider body doesn't work for flow, ctrl-h
01:08:087 (1) - same kind of thing. The cursor has to stop moving in order to follow the slider
01:50:264 (4,5) - spacing emphasis way too large
01:51:676 (9,1) - + harder to follow because slider goes other way
01:56:264 (1) - hard to follow slider flow
02:14:440 (1) - don't make sliders flow directly where they came from after a jump
02:27:146 (4,5) - sliders don't flow to each other, move 5 and 7 up
02:31:911 (3,1) - same thing about spacing, use higher spacing for important stuff. this really needs changing.
03:25:558 (3,1) - ^
02:33:676 (1,2,3,4,5) - doesn't flow well from previous jumps, try curving
02:47:087 (1) - try putting this under 02:46:029 (2) - , deserves as much emphasis as next circle
02:51:499 (4,5) - iirc you didn't use double stacked notes like this much in other kiais, don't introduce out of nowhere
03:06:676 (7,1,2,3) - please do not mess around with SV like this until you are 100% confident with what you are doing
03:07:205 (1) - burai sliders, unrankable since unsure what is going on in the middle bit. 03:12:852 (1) - are fine though
03:08:264 (1) - 3/4 sliders weren't used anywhere else before, too late to introduce
03:20:264 (3) - don't place next slider directly behind reverse slider it rarely works
Haven't looked at the other diffs but the same things I said in here will probably apply to the other ones, mainly sliders flow and distance spacing. gl
00:08:264 (3,4,5,1) - Inconsistent with previous spacings, these ones are a lot smaller compared to stuff like 00:02:617 (3) - and 00:05:440 (3) -
00:10:382 (1) - These jumps don't really emphasise any specific sounds, they just get bigger. eg. 00:10:911 (3,4) - is bigger than the last ones without much extra
00:11:617 (8) - should really map the drums here
00:13:205 (1,2,3) - Using really wide angles like this isn't great for normal flow
00:13:911 (3) - Vocals are mostly 1/2, but are mapped with sliders which only emphasise half of them, whereas 00:15:499 (4) - has one vocal held sound and is circle jumps. Should really be swapped.
00:16:029 (1) - This slider doesn't look nice, just use a normal S shaped one like 01:12:499 (1) -
00:16:558 (2,3,4) - same thing about wide angle flow, doesn't work well here
00:16:911 (4) - You can't click the higher note which is at 00:17:264 (5) - , which emphasises it less. Change to just circles
00:17:440 (1) - guitar is on the slider tail, change rhythm so it's clickable
00:20:264 (1) - This finish uses the exact same spacing compared to the other circles, increase for proper emphasis
00:21:499 (4,5,1) - just use a normal stack
00:22:911 (3) - Should map vocal here because there's an "a" sound here
00:39:146 (2) - ^
00:24:499 (1) - This would look a lot better if it was curved
00:26:087 (2,3) - spacing too small here
00:34:911 (4,5,1) - Use normal stack, cursor has to really slow down to hit this properly
00:35:440 (2,1) - More important sounds need larger spacing, just make sure that most finishes use larger spacing than other parts.
00:42:676 (6,1) - This doesn't flow
00:48:146 (1,1) - Needs larger spacing for important part here
00:49:205 (3) - Map piano like you did before other chorus
00:53:264 (6) - This would look better if curved to the right
00:56:264 (4) - ^
00:56:793 (1) - Slider body is undreadable here, just use something a little more normal
00:56:793 (1,2) - why spacing so small
00:57:676 (4,1) - same thing about spacing, larger for important parts
00:59:440 (5,6,1) - 6,1 shouldn't be smaller for better flow
01:04:382 (5,6) - check rhythm here, doesn't follow vocals well because slider tail on important sound
01:05:264 (1,2,3,4) - nice pattern here
01:06:676 (1) - slider body doesn't work for flow, ctrl-h
01:08:087 (1) - same kind of thing. The cursor has to stop moving in order to follow the slider
01:50:264 (4,5) - spacing emphasis way too large
01:51:676 (9,1) - + harder to follow because slider goes other way
01:56:264 (1) - hard to follow slider flow
02:14:440 (1) - don't make sliders flow directly where they came from after a jump
02:27:146 (4,5) - sliders don't flow to each other, move 5 and 7 up
02:31:911 (3,1) - same thing about spacing, use higher spacing for important stuff. this really needs changing.
03:25:558 (3,1) - ^
02:33:676 (1,2,3,4,5) - doesn't flow well from previous jumps, try curving
02:47:087 (1) - try putting this under 02:46:029 (2) - , deserves as much emphasis as next circle
02:51:499 (4,5) - iirc you didn't use double stacked notes like this much in other kiais, don't introduce out of nowhere
03:06:676 (7,1,2,3) - please do not mess around with SV like this until you are 100% confident with what you are doing
03:07:205 (1) - burai sliders, unrankable since unsure what is going on in the middle bit. 03:12:852 (1) - are fine though
03:08:264 (1) - 3/4 sliders weren't used anywhere else before, too late to introduce
03:20:264 (3) - don't place next slider directly behind reverse slider it rarely works
Haven't looked at the other diffs but the same things I said in here will probably apply to the other ones, mainly sliders flow and distance spacing. gl