m4m reply thing
barely 2 minutes of drain for this, lol
please capitalise the "P" in "project" in your source since every other map has it like that and it is the common way to write it
intro:
idk but that soft-hitnormal disgusts me :/ it seems to not really fit, try this maybe: http://lasse.s-ul.eu/xYfqYUyf
or use the default one, there is nothing that really makes you need to use such "strong" soft hitnormals here.
"softer" ones would go much better with the inrstuments
00:40:804 (1,2,3,4,5) - having those
00:42:383 (4) - why the sudden drop in spacing? there are strong drum beats on this, at least keep it the same
00:52:804 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I know you want to emphasize the piano here, but that whistle spam is a bit too much, could also use a bit more fitting sound for this addition... using hihat (or whatever) sounds for a piano?
00:53:751 (1,2,3,4,1) - ^
same for all the other times this happens
01:05:751 (5) - 1/2 slider to not ignore the audible red tick?
01:06:225 (7,8,9) - why is 9 stacked, those sounds dont imply a real spacing change imo
01:19:330 (1) - those hitnormals again...
01:22:804 - I get you want to focus on the piano, but this is too strong for a sliderend. 01:22:172 (2) - is the same sound and you made it a click...
01:22:330 (3) - why the stack? 3 is so strong, dont stack it ;_;
01:23:909 (5) - why does this have lower spacing than before even though it is clearly way stronger?
01:40:172 (3) - no reason to stack, space a bit
01:40:488 (5) - this is so strong aaaa stacking makes literally 0 sense
stacking 1/1 like this is fine 01:43:804 (4,5) - since they are so far apart in time, but for 1/4 and 3/4 sldier -> tap it makes not much sense when they are clearly stronger beats
wont comment on those anymore, you get what I mean :v
01:52:646 (4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - drum hitsound this?
02:07:962 (3) - spacing the anchors a bit would look nicer here http://i.imgur.com/7YJY79K.jpg
02:10:172 (2) - so with those you decide to skip the stronger red tick completely and emphasize the blue one which doesnt make much sense? if you want to follow the vocals or sth at least mute the sliderend, same for many others
sections feels a bit repetitve since it seems like 90% of your jump pattern consist of stars with some occasional tirangles and back and forths the become stars again. eh...
04:16:172 (1) - ^
04:35:751 (1) - wow i think this is the first time thpse hitnormal actually fit a little bit, but only until 04:36:383 (1) -
whole section 05:44:593 (1) - star spam and all again. I gues people will play it and say it's nice because those are pretty easy for their sr and all but it still seems so....
05:48:541 (4,5,6,7,8,1) - different spacing doesnt really make sense here
gl with this
barely 2 minutes of drain for this, lol
please capitalise the "P" in "project" in your source since every other map has it like that and it is the common way to write it
intro:
idk but that soft-hitnormal disgusts me :/ it seems to not really fit, try this maybe: http://lasse.s-ul.eu/xYfqYUyf
or use the default one, there is nothing that really makes you need to use such "strong" soft hitnormals here.
"softer" ones would go much better with the inrstuments
00:40:804 (1,2,3,4,5) - having those
00:42:383 (4) - why the sudden drop in spacing? there are strong drum beats on this, at least keep it the same
00:52:804 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I know you want to emphasize the piano here, but that whistle spam is a bit too much, could also use a bit more fitting sound for this addition... using hihat (or whatever) sounds for a piano?
00:53:751 (1,2,3,4,1) - ^
same for all the other times this happens
01:05:751 (5) - 1/2 slider to not ignore the audible red tick?
01:06:225 (7,8,9) - why is 9 stacked, those sounds dont imply a real spacing change imo
01:19:330 (1) - those hitnormals again...
01:22:804 - I get you want to focus on the piano, but this is too strong for a sliderend. 01:22:172 (2) - is the same sound and you made it a click...
01:22:330 (3) - why the stack? 3 is so strong, dont stack it ;_;
01:23:909 (5) - why does this have lower spacing than before even though it is clearly way stronger?
01:40:172 (3) - no reason to stack, space a bit
01:40:488 (5) - this is so strong aaaa stacking makes literally 0 sense
stacking 1/1 like this is fine 01:43:804 (4,5) - since they are so far apart in time, but for 1/4 and 3/4 sldier -> tap it makes not much sense when they are clearly stronger beats
wont comment on those anymore, you get what I mean :v
01:52:646 (4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - drum hitsound this?
02:07:962 (3) - spacing the anchors a bit would look nicer here http://i.imgur.com/7YJY79K.jpg
02:10:172 (2) - so with those you decide to skip the stronger red tick completely and emphasize the blue one which doesnt make much sense? if you want to follow the vocals or sth at least mute the sliderend, same for many others
sections feels a bit repetitve since it seems like 90% of your jump pattern consist of stars with some occasional tirangles and back and forths the become stars again. eh...
04:16:172 (1) - ^
04:35:751 (1) - wow i think this is the first time thpse hitnormal actually fit a little bit, but only until 04:36:383 (1) -
whole section 05:44:593 (1) - star spam and all again. I gues people will play it and say it's nice because those are pretty easy for their sr and all but it still seems so....
05:48:541 (4,5,6,7,8,1) - different spacing doesnt really make sense here
gl with this