1. Easy (1,45 stars, 71 notes)
2. Freedom (4,91 stars, 405 notes)
3. Hard (3,43 stars, 226 notes)
4. Insane (4,16 stars, 302 notes)
5. Normal (2,07 stars, 129 notes)

Stjpa wrote:

[Easy]
• Disable 'Widescreen Support' - done, in most of the diffs

• Maybe a higher Stack Lenincy? 3 seems very low to me. - welp I don't think it matters that much in E/N since you see the objects clearly

• You mapped some parts with 1/2, which is not allowed in an Easy diff. Overall you should care more about polarity. Take a look on other Easy diffs, you will see the difference between their diffs and your diff. - removed two 1/2 sliders in the kiai, the rest are fine imo, since an Easy of mine got ranked with such sliders, and a reversed 1/2 too

• Some parts are really off like 02:23:825 (1,2,3,4,5,6) and 00:18:401 (2). Also it seems like there are some objects that don't even fit like 00:13:489 (3). I'd suggest to remap it after looking through some other Easy diffs. - the first time stamp is kinda broken lol. 00:13:489 (3) that's the part where she says " same town... "etc, I mean, that's on point, going with the vocals, I can't do much about those in general as well, not only in E/N


[Normal]
•00:22:612 (1) - The reverse arrow is supposed to be on the previous white tick. Then you just have to place a circle between this and the next slider. - yea, that works as well, but following the vocals here to make it easier

• 00:25:419 (1) - ^. Try to map more to the beat than to the voice. It's often way simpler, and actually better for beginner diffs. - ^ (I might actually change it, I like both tbh)

• 00:53:489 (1,1) - Not enough recovery time. - ~4 secs should be enough imo

This diff is actually really good except the start where some sliders are bit off. - blame the vocals xd


[Hard]
• Disable 'Widescreen Support' - done

• Use OD6 for a proper spread between the diffs. HP5 is also better. - hp is fine, od lowered to 6

• 00:17:524 (2,3,4,1) - You should consider between 1/1 stacks or 1/2 stacks. Having both of them that close will break many combos, it's just confusing. - you're right, wow haven't really thought of that since it's easy for me, changed.

• 00:53:313 (10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - It's strange how the first stack is made of 3 circles and the next stacks just out of 2. Would highly recommend to change it. - ye I was not that sure about this one as well, stacked circle 10 with 9, gets much easier to read/play


[Freedom]
• Disable 'Widescreen Support' (also counts for Insane, couldn't find any flaws in that diff so I mention it here) - nice

• 00:52:612 (4,5,6,7,8) - Just bring some movement in here. - okay sure to the right we go

Else your last 2 diffs are done super well. Can't complain at all! - why thank you ~

Freedom

Tshemmp wrote:

[Freedom]
00:21:910 (5) - NC? - would look to colourful (for all the diffs, might as well NC them if it gets necessary)
00:22:612 (1) - move a bit to the bottom right so it looks like this: http://puu.sh/kSASa.jpg - wanted to have a stack, looking like the auto one cuz I've used auto stacks everywhere
00:23:840 (4,5,1) - manual stack here aswell? ^
00:28:840 (3) - why not just 2 circles instead - wanted something oustanding
00:33:577 - 5% volume? why it's weird imo - yea, but I've already commented on that stream, for real.. should not be a problem imo
00:33:489 (1,2,3,4,1) - why are they spaced so much more tightly than the stream before? I mean there is actually no "stream" here in the song, why map a stream at all - it's complicated ;c ^
00:42:875 (3) - I really think you should replace this with two circles since you also have circles here 00:42:085 (9,10) - okay
00:55:945 - same as the two points at 00:33:577 - ^~^

[Insane]
00:21:910 (5) - NC? -
00:22:612 (1) - same as in Freedom, do you want a manual stack here or an automatic one? I think a mixture of both looks bad - manual stack made to look like an automatic one, since it gets ugly with an auto one (consistency purposes)
00:28:840 (3,4) - ok, here you indeed do use circles instead of a slider - there is no slider ;o
00:56:033 - 5% volume intended here? - for the slider end, muted it cuz sounds inappropriate, but why I got a 3/4 slider here.. well idk same like the stream thing, with a slider instead, emphasizing stuff

[Hard]
00:21:910 (6) - NC? -
00:22:612 (1) - you know what I want - same stuff I mentioned above xd
00:32:787 (5) - NC? you did this in you other diffs aswell - oh, yea sure forgot about that one lolz
00:46:471 (5) - NC maybe? - yup sure
00:52:085 (6) - ^ - oooookay
01:02:612 (4) - move a bit to the bottom right please? - sameeeeee stack stuff xd
01:04:015 (4) - ^ - ^ but I think it looks neat and consistent ;_;
01:13:840 (4) - sorry, but could it be that you don't know that you can just move 01:13:752 (3,4) - directly under the end of the previous slider? http://puu.sh/kSCvm.jpg - from what I understand, that's the same exact stacking thing done in all of the diffs (except E/N)
01:14:892 (2,3,4) - nice - lmfao das ugly af, hope it looks better now

[Normal]
00:15:419 (2) - mmhh, instead of this cirlce on a red tick, wouldn't it be nicer if you could just make a slider which ends exactly here? - probably, but looks meeh, since I hate such long sliders
00:21:033 (6) - ^ - ^
also 00:19:805 (5) - NC for consistency - okay
00:21:910 (7,1) - I would increase the spacing a bit, I know it says 1,00x but is actually lower since you don't really move your cursor to the very end of the slider but start moving to (1) a bit earlier, so maybe put 1,20x or something? - sticking to the rules ;/
00:59:980 (3) - maybe delete idk I don't really like this part, it looks a bit unclear, maybe because of the sharp turn, I think something like this could work better http://puu.sh/kSDil.jpg but really idk - now that u mention it yea, the direction is too sudden k changed
01:05:594 (3) - it's fine here - hope it wasn't sarcasm o,o

[Easy]
00:15:419 (5) - same as in Normal but I think especially in a Easy diff you should do it - long sliders getting too ugly
00:21:033 (5) - ^ - ^
00:47:875 (1) - since this ends on a red tick you are kinda introducing a rhythm parallel to the vocals here which makes one think 00:48:927 (2) - would be on a red tick aswell but it isn't. I would either end (1) on a white tick or put (2) on a red tick aswell - moved 2 on a red tick, does sound much better
00:50:682 (1,2) - fine here because there is no background rhythm conflict here. Actually why are you using basically the same patterns like at 00:47:875 - ? Isn't it more similar to 00:39:454 - and should be mapped accordingly? - made it like 00:39:454

06Kiempuu90 wrote:

00:22:261 (7,8) - Just WTH

bigjoe97 wrote:

From my queue hihi thanks for accepting

Easy

00:35:945 (3) - Maybe a full beat slider here, right now it feels kinda empty with the pause. - vocals ;/
00:41:559 (3) - Same thing. - ^ (might change it if somebody else points out that as well)
00:42:261 (1) - Start at 00:42:085 to follow vocals, you're following the vocals everywhere else so just stay consistent. - well imo it sounds good enough for an Easy diff, might as well change that too
00:47:173 (3) - Full beat slider? - ^
00:47:875 (1) - Start at 00:47:699 to follow vocals - ^
00:49:278 (3) - Start at 00:49:103 to follow vocals - ^

Normal

00:25:068 (4) - Too hard to read for Normal perhaps - changed the pattern, no overlaps
00:33:138 (5) - NC, new phrase starts here - kay, NC-ing this part for every diff then
00:33:840 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - This is a really long pattern. Maybe make 00:34:892 (3) a circle for a bit of a break. - wanted some variations, but changed to a circle
00:44:717 (8) - Circle for a break? This pattern is also really long. - changed the pattern, much easier now
00:59:980 (3) - Remove this for a bit of a break between patterns. - hm imma leave it as it is, to be consistent with the rest of the kiai

Hard

00:16:998 (1,2,3) - Flow here is awkward. Maybe something like this? - fixed the awkwardness
00:19:629 (1) - No 1/4 beat rhythm here, why the repeating slider? - a triple, imo it's totally fine here, like in Insane and Freedom
00:22:524 (8) - Nothing here, remove. - ^ same triple stuff with the diffs
00:26:822 (1,2) - Awkward flow. Maybe [url=https://gyazo.com/189c1560be2013bf299eb3b8e5c3845f]this[url]? - oh that's not as awkward as the previous one, I'll leave it for now
00:42:612 (2,3) - Ctrl+G for circular flow - AWESOME, why didn't I come up with this LOL nice one

Really enjoyed the kiai on this one. why thank uu

Insane

00:21:910 (5) - NC here, start of a new phrase. - okay, now this I changed in every single diff
00:55:945 (1) - I'm not a fan of the slowdown on these sliders, they look a lot like normal speed 1/2 beat sliders at first glance which makes it really easy to combobreak by releasing too early. - well the fact that there is literally nothing in the song right here, should make it obvious imo, emphasizing and stuff

Other than that, this looked good. noice

Freedom

00:22:085 (6,7,8) - What's going on here - xD NC-ed
00:33:577 (2,3,4) - I'd just remove these - why the h8 on those streams :c
00:56:033 (2,3,4) - Same thing with these - but ain't they cool

Loved this diff, lots of fun to play with the streams and such. - thank you!

Nice job!

• - bolded difficulties are the ones that I modded

1. 00:42:261 (1) – I don’t think making this a 3/2 slider is the best idea, since the beat on 00:42:787 isn’t very strong. Maybe shorten it into a 1/1 slider; the beat on 00:42:612 is more powerful
2. 00:43:313 (2) – Maybe you can move this to 00:43:138 and make it into a 1/2 slider, since there’s a stronger beat there
3. 00:52:787 (4) – Maybe you can make this a repeat slider?

1. 00:14:191 (1) – Fix this blanket
2. 00:25:068 (4) – These beat feels off because the beat on 00:24:892 is stronger; maybe move this circle here or make 00:24:717 (3) a 1/2 slider
3. 00:27:875 (4) – Similar issue to the above
4. 00:47:524 (6) – Maybe you can delete this circle to create more emphasis

1. 00:22:524 (3) – Maybe you can stack this over 00:22:612 (1) instead? Having it stacked underneath 00:22:085 (2) looks a little weird, given the pattern. It’s also consistent with what you did in the kiai time
2. 00:37:261 – Add a circle here maybe?
3. 00:44:892 (6) – I don’t think this beat is strong enough that it should be a circle; maybe make 00:44:717 (5) a 1/2 slider instead of having a circle here
4. 01:05:331 – Add a circle here, perhaps?

1. 00:18:401 (4) – New combo here?
2. 00:44:892 (6) – Similar issue to hard; I don’t think this beat is strong enough that it should be a circle

1. 00:33:577 (2,3,4) – These are waaay too quiet
2. 00:56:033 (2,3,4) – ^
3. Also, just my own opinion, but I don’t think the two above should be streams anyways- it feels overmapped

Freedom

The Fetish wrote:

NM From Queue.

Cool little map. I can only offer a couple personal suggestions here, as there isnt really anything wrong at all with this map. well it is still something so it's okay

Freedom

00:32:436 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - Id personally map streams like this starting with low spacing and increasing. Kinda works as a build up that way. - the first 1-8 is less spaced, 1-4 is getting a bit bigger, but in 2 stages only, which I think is enough for the build up, as for the almost silenced stream, like I said before, it is getting kind of quieter so I shortened the stream a lot.
00:34:717 (8,9) - More emphasis between these two streams? The tiny distance felt a little out of place. - I would tbh but don't want to ruin the flow there, just before the small spacing
00:50:682 (1,2,3,4) - IMO this jump is a little too difficult. Scale it down a bit. - well 2 and 3 were ctrl-G'd the first time, but the spacing between 3 and the stream was super low so I actually ctrl-G'd em, but hey I curved the stream to the left and this way reduced the spacing.

Again. Sorry for the super short mod. This is rankable as it is. I can only offer a few ideas I wouldve used myself.

Good luck.

FCL wrote:

M4M

• [General]

1. Your BG have 1365x768 size, fix pls - fixed
2. I really don't understand why you don't use the normal hitsounds at agressive parts (00:33:840 - 01:18:752). Just try! - well it sounds good but I don't usually use the default skin and my N/S/D hitnormals are the same so yea

• [Easy]

1. 00:21:910 (1) - i am not recommended you to use 1/2 at Easy diff, because it may be to hard for playing for beginner players - ok I'll change some and keep some
2. 00:57:348 - map this beat pls - I'll keep it like that so the diff won't increase
3. 01:00:155 - same - ^
4. 01:02:963 - and so on - ^
5. 01:04:717 (1) - make tail a parallel to 01:04:015 (3) - . So will better - It already is parallel with slider 2, wanted some variations
6. 01:07:524 (1) - ^ same, but head - same slider 2-3 pattern here as above, keeping this one consistent

• [Normal]

1. 01:14:191 (3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - this part is too long have 1/2 rhythm. I recommend you just delete 01:15:770 (7) - okay sure

• [Hard]

1. 00:27:173 (2,3,4,5,6) - looks a little weird. Just try to follow to a flow http://puu.sh/lhS7H/5e2e546bab.jpg - yea it is a bit weird, but still flows just fine *cough*star pattern*cough*
2. 00:39:454 (1,2) - little fix blanket - okay
3. 00:46:120 (3) - move on 328;156 for better flow - it's fine
4. 01:17:875 (4) - rotate on 45 degrees - 45 is too much, 8 worked fine xD

• [Insane]

1. 00:34:366 (2,3,4,5,6) - make more spacing, like 00:37:173 (2,3,4,5,6) - . Not reasons to do it
2. 00:46:120 (6,7,8,9) - same, like 00:47:524 (7,8,9,10) -
3. 01:18:752 (1) - make a more spacing to allocate the end of song - I'd, but it gets kinda meh to hit if I distance cirlce1 moooore
   The two spacings are just some variations, I'm not sticking to a certain consistency here so I'm not changing those

• [Freedom]

1. imo, 9.1 AR is better, like my map - yea but with 9.1 you barely see any change, with 9.2 you certainly see changing
2. 00:38:401 (2) - move on 100;208 for good flow - it flows nice atm
3. 00:44:541 (2,1) - stack - okay
4. 01:09:278 (3,4,5,6) - spacing is too close - but it's okay now : |
5. 01:17:348 (1) - touch HP bar, it's unranked - uhh it's not touching the bar o.o (I don't think the approach circle that touches the bar counts)
6. 01:18:752 (1) - same as Insane diff - well it is NCed so it's emphasizing enough

Omg, this mapset is really ready for rank in my opinion. Good luck!

Nekomata wrote:

looks pretty qualified to me
just gonna look at more important details in terms of gameplay and rankability

easy
some of your rhythm here might be confusing
00:39:528 (1,2) - use similar rhythm to 00:33:914 (1,2,3) - instead? apparently this rhythm is probably the best one imo for easy in this song lol - yea, that's actually a nice idea lol
00:47:949 (1,2) - i would probably be clicking on 00:49:177 and be sad i missed the note (aka it first seems like it follows vocals and then suddenly instrumentals) - change also like 00:33:914 (1,2,3) - by removing (2) and repeating (1). you will have to adjust distances after i guess - sure, but I'm leaving 00:50:756 (1,2,3,4) for some variation, even tho an Easy diff changed

normal
yes <---

hard
hard-normal spread may be too far apart - yea I know that the gap is actually big - i suggest reducing some jumps like 00:53:563 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) done, the flow got pretty cool as well - and these triples: 00:35:229 (6) - 00:37:335 (4) - 00:40:844 (5) - 00:52:072 (5) -
if you can reduce this difficulty to at least 3.4* or even 3.3* then it should be safe - I'll try to reduce it, but removing those 4 triples reduces the SR by 0,01 lol imo the SR is broken as fuck, the gap is just fine but I'll still try to do sth
00:19:703 (1) - a bit awkward to play this since i expect the downbeat to be clickable. make it similar to insane (although instead of triple it can be a 1/2 rhythm since a constant 1/4 triple-click actually seems out of place here in a Hard) removing it
00:39:177 (5,6) - try this flow - yyyea that's actually a nice idea
pretty good, but it seems like an insane sometimes

insane
00:19:177 (4) - pls no offset-stack it like this, in addition to readability it improves flow - okay fixed

freedom
00:13:563 (3) - how about two 1/2 sliders so the town can be a nice town xDDD lmfao well tbh two 1/2 sliders would actually be the most correct way to do it, but I really like how it sounds with a 1/4 slider, that should not be a problem

ok go call bn yea very soon tm, thanks for da modd

Kuki wrote:

[general]
00:31:107 - this part in most diffs is far too quiet, up the volume a bit. - think it's all fine, since I've reduced my music volume to 70%. anyway increased with 5%, 10% would ruin the the buildup ;/

[easy]
00:21:107 (5) - not so sure about this placement, it seems a little weird cause it doesn't follow the slider, then the next note's flow is a little too straight for my liking too. I would play around with the placement and maybe even remap this small section to improve the flow. - remaped it, it's better now imo
00:35:317 (2,3) - I suggest something like this, it makes more sense flow wise, keeps the same spacing, and is more fun and comfortable to play. - perfect. changed~
00:58:475 (3,3,3,3,4) - you should not have any 1/2 in an easy, especially at this bpm. if it was 120-140, this could possibly be allowed, but not for this bpm. - alright then, changed those 1/2s
01:17:422 (2,3,4,1) - move 01:18:826 (1) - to x=173 y=192 to make this pattern symmetrical. - it currently forms a star pattern without the 5th circle, so leaving it I LOVE STARS GODDAMN IT
[normal]
you need to add some spacing differences in the normal so players can get adjusted to what it would be like to play a harder difficulty, keep this in mind and change a bit of the spacing in this difficulty. - irc thingy, no changes were made

00:14:265 (1,2) - why is this so anti-flow? it's a normal, and generally you should try to make notes flow off of sliders, which 00:15:493 (2) - doesn't. move (2) or remap this small section and focus more on flow. - fixed the anti flow, but the DS between 00:15:493 (2) and the next slider is kinda broken, since there's a little pause I don't think that this would be problematic


[hard]
00:18:475 (1,2,3,4) - move 00:19:001 (3) - to x=299 y=41 to line it up with 00:18:826 (2) - and make this pattern look nicer - I did something lmfao atm it plays good and doesn't look bad imo
00:19:703 (1) - this is mapped to no sound. not only is this unrankable but it makes no sense either. remove it. - the H one got removed, the I/E ones are described below.
00:22:598 - ^ - I'm planning on keeping all of those (H/I/E), the meaning behind this one circle, placed where there's no actual sound is to emphasize the next sound. Realistically it doesn't increase the difficulty at all.
01:10:931 (3) - rotate this a bit so it looks more like this, current rotation looks and plays a little funny. - more like a bit awkward, but it was a blanket anyway sure changed
01:18:826 (1) - maybe stack this on 01:17:949 (4) - instead to add some emphasis to the last note, because atm it needs some emphasis and has none. - maybe, but the NC and the finish are enough to emphasize the final, the spacing increase is not that necessary to me

[insane]
00:15:493 (6) - perhaps stack this on 00:13:037 (2) -, this looks and plays a lot nicer this way, and currently it's a little boring and looks off under such a small slider. - I've discussed those circles (here and in E) with grumd, have no intentions of changing them atm
00:21:107 (4) - same as above, maybe stack this on 00:19:528 (5) - same
00:22:598 (3) - this is mapped to no sound, and like i said earlier, it has to be removed. -
00:24:001 (6) - ^
00:36:019 (5) - you should flip this upside-down so it flows nicer to 00:36:370 (6) -, like this for example. - that's a good idea, but the current flow is better imo, from 2 to the triple+slider and then it gets a bit zigzag-like from slider5 to 6 and to slider7 with its direction, get it xd here's what I mean

[freedom]
00:15:493 (5) - same as what i said in the insane, perhaps stack it on 00:13:563 (3) -.
00:21:107 (4) - same as above, maybe stack on 00:17:773 (3) -.
00:22:598 (3) - mapped to nothing, same as all the other diffs i've mentioned this in, it needs to be removed.
00:24:001 (5) - same here.
all those are mentioned in the previous diffs (H/I) , sorry for no changes :c
thanks for the request, good luck with the set, it's quite good! aw why thank you, actually I am thankful for the accepted request