Just sayin this doesnt need a change, only for excessive switching.Sky Trias wrote:
Hi Slick! o/
[General]
- 04:11:887 - Kiai Time is toggled on for less than 15 seconds. (check AIMod)
Just sayin this doesnt need a change, only for excessive switching.Sky Trias wrote:
Hi Slick! o/
[General]
- 04:11:887 - Kiai Time is toggled on for less than 15 seconds. (check AIMod)
Arphimigon wrote:
Here we go again.
[Grimoire]
00:04:471 (4,5,6) - Only spaced 1/4 out of the whole start section (and most the map) so either don't add or add a couple more for consistency
00:06:325 (6) - Pls rotate about 10 degrees flows better imo fixed
00:09:359 (1,4) - Bad blanket yo fixed
00:08:347 (3,4,5,6) - End slider is too curved for this pattern, reduce the curve a little fixed
00:10:454 (8) - Please remove this note, this triple plays better as two hittable notes fixed
00:19:977 (1,2) - This really plays bad, the snap needed to get to the curve doesnt compliment the curve itself, start the curve further down please fixed
01:39:527 (3,4) - Dont make 4 touchy fixed
02:27:729 (1,2,3,4,5) - Nerf to like 0.75 DS or smth, it's a bit spaced for a sudden stream
03:16:943 (3) - This sounds better as a note imo
04:24:696 (1) - 177|162 for OP blankets!
04:29:415 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I really do see this being a DQ for unneccessary diffspike cant you try changing 04:30:089 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - into something how 5eania had done it 03:03:797 (7,8,9) - ?
Why haven't you ranked this already baka
Thank you, Loughje!Loughje wrote:
PM request~GrimoireNot a huge mod, really nice map! Hope this helps and good luck on rankings!00:03:628 (6,3) - Blanket these and see how you like it.
00:05:651 (3,5) - Could make this into a perfect blanket, just a little off. fixed
00:11:887 (1,1) - I know you're trying to match the violin but I think ending the slider where the hitsound is might be a better option, up to you.
00:19:640 (5,1) - Small blanket issue. fixed
00:19:977 (1,2) - ^ fixed
00:26:381 (4) - This seems a bit close to 00:25:875 (3) maybe move it back a bit for a cleaner look. fixed
00:26:887 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - These are pretty quiet , think about turning up the volume for these a little bit. fixed
00:36:156 (1,2) - 00:36:156 (1,2) - These are hitting which doesn't look too good in here, maybe blanket instead? fixed
00:40:707 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - More very quiet notes.
01:09:696 (6,3) - Pretty extreme jumps, maybe take them down just a bit.
02:05:482 (2) - Why not blanket this with 02:05:145 (1)
02:11:718 (6) - Really close notes again, think of moving. fixed
03:05:735 (1,2) - ^
03:35:145 (3) - The tail of this is odd being right next to 03:35:482 (1)
03:36:662 (1) - Id curve this up to 03:37:505 (2) For a better flow. fixed
03:48:123 (3) - I think this slider looks odd behind 03:47:617 (1) take a look and see if you know what I mean.
04:00:763 (4,1) - Move 1 back for a cleaner blanket.
04:33:460 - Timing point here and set it to BPM: 89
Thank you, Lasse!Lasse wrote:
little check from #memehelp
02:11:887 (1) - move the last point a little bit to the right, would look better imo fixed
03:02:448 (4,1) - blanket looks minimally off
03:05:145 (4,2) - stack end of 4 on 2?
03:53:347 (2) - move a little bit up/right so the completed slider lead more to it# fixed
04:06:999 (3) - dangerously close to being offscreen... fixed
04:08:853 (4,1) - blanket the end of 4 with the upper part of 1? might do
04:09:527 (2) - move to around 228/48? fixed
04:12:224 (2) - blanket or stack on sliderend?
04:47:617 (1,2) - blanket in each other fixed
04:51:662 (2) - make this a mirrored version of 1 ?
Honestly, the map seems really well polished and all those mods on it made it really hard to find stuff.
So I've been extremely picky with those
But since it's looks nice I'll leave a star
Forbiddenplayer wrote:
[General]
>Too high SV, but well that's how you mapped it.
>You overuse complex sliders, use it in case of emphasis.
>There are many sections with inappropriate SV.
>I'll mod about unnecessary bezier curves. It just looks awful when misused.[Grimoire]
00:11:887 (1) - Why use a bezier when you can create a better one than that? maybe i'll remake
00:16:774 (6) - Add more spacing here. It is inconsistent. idk
00:17:617 (2) - Unnecessary bezier. maybe
00:19:977 (1) - I know you are following the vocals here but end the slider a tick earlier (where the clap is heard) because it's awkward to hear the slider end. valid suggestion, but it would cause inconsitency so i'll pass
00:27:729 (1) - Change bezier. i think this is fine
00:31:269 (2) - ^ fixed
00:38:010 (3) - Inconsistent with the previous slider. Make it a three point curve then just make it a little bigger so it can end on the blue tick. maybe
00:41:550 (1) - Bezier looks awful here. I won't mind beziers when it looks fine. fixed
00:43:572 (2) - ^ i think this is fine
01:47:617 (1) - Improve curve. changed a little
01:53:010 (1) and 01:53:516 (3) - ^ agreed, but haven't apply it yet
01:55:707 (1) - This slider looks too complex even without emphasis. Try lessening the red points. fixed
02:16:269 (3,4,5,6) - Make it a curved stream for aesthetics and as a blanket for 02:16:100 (2). passed
02:22:673 (1) - Too fast and high SV starting from here until 02:28:066 (5). will see about this
02:34:471 (2) - Improve S-shape.
03:54:022 (5) - I suggest a slow curved slider.
04:14:583 (1) - Bad overlap.
04:41:550 (1) - Bad bezier.
04:59:331 (1) - I suggest you end this slider at 05:01:774 because the sound stops there.
phaZ wrote:
volume in general is bit low, since you already havent that much hitsounds and use the soft sample. suggest increasing it a bit
try to add more patterns with ctrl+d, ctrl+r, ctrl+h, ctrl+j
00:11:044 (3,1) - chaniging slidervelocity (sv) is fine but it feels really wrong to change here again (its noticeable while playing) because it doesnt feel different (at all). doing only one sv-change would also keep the map more clean overall
00:16:100 (2,3,5,7,8) - add soft-whistles? fixed
00:17:954 - inherited section really nessecary? ask yourself that for all following inherited sections too
00:18:460 (1) - a bit too slow, disturbs the flow a bit imo. suggesting a bit higher sv. to keep up the current pattern maybe add a circle at 00:18:460 - and move the slider to 00:18:628 - .you wouldnt miss the white tick-beat, too increased slider SV, might change pattern
00:19:977 (1,2) - the music suggests the same rhythm for both sliders. or at least there no particular reason to do them differently. again 00:19:977 (1) - feels a bit slow (better than 00:18:460 (1) tough). increase the sv to 0.7 or 0.75 and let the slider instead end on 00:20:314 which also alloes you to remove the inherited section there... the cleaner the better^^
00:20:988 (3) - select the slider-slide and add whislte :p
00:21:831 (2) - ^
00:22:336 (3) - select slider-slide and add normal-whistle. change volume if you want to
00:28:404 (2,3) - same as 00:19:977 (1,2). music doesnt suggest different rhythms here, chose one only
00:29:246 (1) - a bit too slow, disturbs flow imo. increase sv fixed
00:38:516 (5) - add whislte fixed
00:41:044 (3,4,5) - add whislte fixed
00:42:055 (2) - ^ on slider head fixed
00:42:392 (3) - ^ fixed
00:43:235 (1) - ^ fixed
00:43:572 (2) - (^) fixed
00:43:909 (3) - ^ fixed
00:44:246 (1,2) - here you did keep rhythm consistent
00:44:752 (2) - add whistle on slider head fixed
00:46:437 (5,6,7) - whistle fixed
00:46:943 (1,2) - does the vocals sound different to 00:41:550 (1,2) - ? your rhythm is inconsistent here. fixed
00:47:448 (2) - whislte on slider head fixed
00:47:786 (3) - (^) fixed
00:48:965 (5,6) - add whisltes on slider head fixed
00:49:471 (7) - ^ fixed
00:49:640 - normal sample fits really good here imo
00:55:538 (3,4) - ctrl+g?
00:57:729 (1,2,1) - with the current flow that zic-zac is pretty awful to play although it fits great with the music. i suggest to change that spinning/circling pattern at 00:56:887 (3,4,5,6,7). just ctrl+g 00:57:055 (4,5) and it feels fine
00:58:741 (2,1) - increase the distance spacing (ds) between them. 00:59:078 (1,1) - can also be a bit higher fixed
01:00:089 (1,2,3,4,1) - compared to other streams or triplets that is much of a ds increase. could also be a bit higher after the screen jumps. just make it like 02:27:729 (1,2,3,4,5) -
01:05:819 (1,2) - woudl make them the same to 01:06:325 (3)
01:14:920 (4,1) - broken flow
01:15:932 (4,5) - that low ds breaks the flow
02:11:887 (1,2,3,4) - o.o why a stream here?
01:51:156 - 01:51:325 - that clap in the music can be represented with a normal-hitnormal sund (shift+w)
01:51:999 - ^
01:52:673 - ^
01:52:505 - the harp (beginning here) can be represented by soft whistles
01:56:887 (1) - here is the sv fine! ...you use a different sv this time wtf
00:19:977 (1,2) - and 01:58:404 (1,2) - have completely different sv and different rhymth (if you did not apply my suggestion) and gives them totally different feeling although they are identic in the music. i personally prefer the first one more. but keep things consistent
02:01:100 (1) - shift+w on the sliderhead to add normal-hitnormal-sample. if you do so, also ctrl+q pls c:
02:02:280 (1) - ^ but on slider tail
02:03:797 (1) - ^ on slider head
02:05:145 (1) - ^
02:06:493 (1) - ^
02:25:370 (1,2,3,1,2,1) - different sv's compared to 00:57:729 (1,2,1,2,1) - make them the same?
02:28:741 (1,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - pls keep the sv the same all the time. its annoying while playing
02:40:201 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2) - ^
02:56:887 (2) - that high slider velocity (sv) here is a bit confusing imo. it doesnt make much of a difference to change it but it absolutely make not sense here
02:57:392 (4) - ctrl+g? flow better imo
03:00:932 (3,4) - flow is akward. i suggest to ctrl+r 03:00:679 (2) - by 25° and then switch the position of 03:00:932 (3,4) (sb look even more awesome then lol)
03:02:954 (2) - that sv-change here is absolutely unfair. how would i know how long that repeat is going? pls remove that sv change for that repeat
03:06:325 (1) - add NC
03:06:493 (2) - remove NC
03:07:842 (3) - why different sv (1.2) comapred to 03:08:179 (1) (here its 1.3) ?
03:13:235 - well now its again another sv-speed (1.25) but why?
03:13:235 (1,1,2) - they sound all the same so they also should have the same sv. remove thos inherited sections to keep the map cleaner which helps to keep the map more consistent
03:15:257 (1,2,3,4,5) - different sv compared to 03:12:561 (1,2,3,4) - again inconsistent >.<
03:35:482 (1,2) - a bit fast imo. lower sv
03:36:072 - very weird inherited section here
04:13:404 (3) - why NC here :v? remove
04:20:988 (6) - ^
04:15:932 (1,1,1,1) - remoce the NC's. its inconsitent to 03:11:213 (1,2,3,4,5,6) -
04:19:977 (1) - duh, thats very fast imo. lower the slider velocity (sv) a bit here
04:21:662 (1,1) - actually the music keeps the same here so why theat sv change? it makes it unnessecary hard to read move the second section to 04:22:336 -
04:21:831 (1) - remove NC
04:22:336 (1) - ^. the anti jumps already tell you the sv change
04:23:853 (1) - remove NC
04:24:190 (3) - why NC here? also if you remove the NC, the distance spacing (ds) should be consitent for the triplet
04:24:696 (1,2) - dont know why sv change here but w/e. remove NC pls
04:26:718 (1,1,1,1,1,2) - same as mentioned before
04:32:954 (1) - totally breaks flow either move it sth like this http://puu.sh/jJcQJ/aee339f06c.jpg or sth like http://puu.sh/jJcT4/d26d4d8601.jpg
04:33:123 (1) - is really slow. increase sv a little bit
you should do a rythm check for the map. liten to the song once or twice and then take a look at your map. search for rhythm patterns in the music which do repeat and try to keep using the same rhythm in your map.
also check for your normal whistles you use in your map. thats inconsistent too.
mapping style is really nice
thanksBaraatje123 wrote:
As promised
[Midge]I also love this part
- 04:13:404 (1) - Consider making it in such way (1)'s end stacks with 04:13:066 (1) - i like the freehand look. stylized choice, i guess
- 04:15:763 (2) - NC for build up for the next part, as it feels quite similar swapped 1 and 2 nc
- 04:17:280 (2) - NC for start of stanza start of stanza is emphasized through the nc on 1. this nc looks cleaner, as 04:16:943 (1,2) - is nc'd in the same way
- 04:20:314 (2) - Nc, cause it looks better done
- 04:22:168 (2) - NC for better readability, it really looks like 1/4, and the huge jump before this doesn't make it better done
- 04:28:067 (2) - NC for stanza same as the reason given before
- 04:29:415 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Tone down a little please. Many people will break/fail only because of this part lowered ds even more, i guess
changed some sliders a littlePpuskalin wrote:
Hi
I Do One Little Mod Good Luck With Rank
[Grimoire]
00:02:954 (3) - Fix That Slider Try This
00:07:842 (8) - Swap This Slider To Circle Like This
00:08:179 - New Combo
00:14:583 (1) - Try This
00:21:325 (4) - Try This
00:55:033 (1) - Try This
01:53:516 (3) - Try This
01:54:190 (5) - NC
01:56:887 (1) - ^
02:35:988 (1) - ^
03:17:111 (4) - ^
04:27:224 (1,1) - Try This
2015-09-01 18:24 Slick: i'll listen it through now with 10% volume music
2015-09-01 18:24 Slick: make sure everything is fine
2015-09-01 18:30 Slick: everything seems fine
2015-09-01 18:30 Slick: but there is one tricky note
2015-09-01 18:30 Slick: can you help me...
2015-09-01 18:30 Baraatje123: which one?
2015-09-01 18:30 Slick: 04:09:527 (2) -
2015-09-01 18:30 Slick: 04:09:696 (1) - this slider becomes so hard to catch
2015-09-01 18:30 Slick: because of 04:09:527 (2) - position
2015-09-01 18:31 Baraatje123: Try 264:384
2015-09-01 18:32 Slick: i'll do that
2015-09-01 18:32 Slick: do you think od shoud be 8?
2015-09-01 18:33 Baraatje123: It's fine at 8
2015-09-01 18:33 Slick: 04:34:808 - and these sliders
2015-09-01 18:33 Slick: should i raise ticks & end to 10% volume?
2015-09-01 18:33 Slick: i didn't know it was unrankable
2015-09-01 18:34 Baraatje123: I double checked and it seems fine now
2015-09-01 18:34 Slick: okay
2015-09-01 18:36 Slick: updated
2015-09-01 18:39 Baraatje123: A few more things
2015-09-01 18:39 Baraatje123: 00:25:370 (1,2) - Can you please remove the overlap?
2015-09-01 18:39 Baraatje123: As said in the thread, move (2) to 267:340, as the current overlap is incredibly awkward ;w;
2015-09-01 18:40 Slick: yeah done
2015-09-01 18:40 Slick: was that all?
2015-09-01 18:40 Baraatje123: 00:54:696 (4) - Consider moving to 211:281 so it stacks with the next object. It looks much better then the current way, due to the weird overlap
2015-09-01 18:41 Baraatje123: That's all
2015-09-01 18:42 Baraatje123: wait
2015-09-01 18:42 Slick: so it's end stacks with 00:55:033 (1) - ?
2015-09-01 18:43 Baraatje123: Just one more thing
2015-09-01 18:43 Slick: like this? http://puu.sh/jWoCL.jpg
2015-09-01 18:43 Baraatje123: yes
2015-09-01 18:43 Baraatje123: 02:42:224 (2) - Ctrl G this please, it makes more sense
2015-09-01 18:43 Slick: yeah
2015-09-01 18:44 Baraatje123: When you fix it and update I can bubble
2015-09-01 18:46 Slick: updated
2015-08-12 01:32 Slick: hi
2015-08-12 01:33 Rumia-: hi
2015-08-12 01:33 Slick: could you play a map of mine?
2015-08-12 01:33 Slick: if possible
2015-08-12 01:34 Slick: ACTION is listening to [http://osu.ppy.sh/b/731905 Rita - Bookmark Memories]
2015-08-12 01:34 Rumia-: ok
2015-08-12 01:35 Rumia-: downloading atm
2015-08-12 01:35 Slick: thank you <3
2015-08-12 01:37 Rumia-: ACTION is listening to [http://osu.ppy.sh/b/731905 Rita - Bookmark Memories]
2015-08-12 01:37 Rumia-: ok
2015-08-12 01:39 Rumia-: wait
2015-08-12 01:40 Rumia-: orz my fps drops randomly omg lol
2015-08-12 01:40 Slick: ;w;
2015-08-12 01:45 Rumia-: lol sorry bad play lol
2015-08-12 01:45 Slick: no was good
2015-08-12 01:46 Slick: really hard map >_<
2015-08-12 01:46 Slick: hmm how was it?
2015-08-12 01:47 Rumia-: lol osu crash
2015-08-12 01:47 Slick: D:
2015-08-12 01:48 Rumia-: hmm overall this diff is pretty inconsistent but cool mapping
2015-08-12 01:48 Slick: inconsisten? ;w;
2015-08-12 01:48 Rumia-: some parts are too exagerated jumps and some part is feel 4 star-ish
2015-08-12 01:48 Slick: oh
2015-08-12 01:48 Slick: yeah dynamic difficulty
2015-08-12 01:48 Slick: shouldn't be a problem though
2015-08-12 01:49 Slick: you mean jumps like
2015-08-12 01:49 Slick: 02:23:348 (4,5,6,7) -
2015-08-12 01:49 Slick: 02:24:527 (2,3,4,5,6) -
2015-08-12 01:49 Slick: 03:50:988 (3,4,5,6,1) -
2015-08-12 01:49 Slick: 03:52:505 (1,2,3,1) -
2015-08-12 01:50 Rumia-: yea
2015-08-12 01:50 Rumia-: includes wriggle slider is hard to react or reach lol
2015-08-12 01:50 Slick: yeah many sliders hard to catch
2015-08-12 01:50 Slick: 02:25:370 (1) - crazy slider !
2015-08-12 01:51 Rumia-: and many sliders felt off or extended lol
2015-08-12 01:51 Slick: :?
2015-08-12 01:51 Slick: hmm
2015-08-12 01:51 Slick: like 01:58:066 (5,1,2,3,4,1,2) -
2015-08-12 01:51 Slick: ?
2015-08-12 01:52 Rumia-: as example 01:47:617 (1) -
2015-08-12 01:52 Rumia-: and also yea
2015-08-12 01:52 Slick: hmm that should be fine
2015-08-12 01:52 Rumia-: 01:58:404 (1,2) - u know these are 1/4
2015-08-12 01:53 Rumia-: and those spacings arent really make sense
2015-08-12 01:53 Slick: slider like that
2015-08-12 01:53 Slick: it's called 3/4?
2015-08-12 01:53 Slick: or 1/4 :?
2015-08-12 01:54 Slick: 01:58:404 (1) - should not be extended
2015-08-12 01:54 Slick: should end on white tick
2015-08-12 01:54 Slick: sounds better
2015-08-12 01:54 Rumia-: yea
2015-08-12 01:54 Rumia-: 02:02:786 (3) - this one too
2015-08-12 01:55 Slick: end on red tick?
2015-08-12 01:55 Rumia-: yea
2015-08-12 01:55 Slick: hmm
2015-08-12 01:55 Slick: i think that one is fine
2015-08-12 01:55 Rumia-: 02:03:460 (3) - this one is good
2015-08-12 01:55 Rumia-: but need closer spacing with next slider
2015-08-12 01:55 Slick: i don't know
2015-08-12 01:55 Slick: slider leniency can be abused easy for this map
2015-08-12 01:55 Rumia-: you think is fine , but as a player i felt its not
2015-08-12 01:55 Slick: like 01:14:583 (1,2,1) -
2015-08-12 01:56 Rumia-: tho its feedbacks you should ask for more testplay etc
2015-08-12 01:56 Slick: it is very different mapping
2015-08-12 01:56 Rumia-: 02:10:875 (3) - like this one , its better end it at red tick and add a note on blue
2015-08-12 01:56 Slick: wow
2015-08-12 01:56 Slick: nice catch
haha5957 wrote:
Just ignore all of these if you don't feel like it this is just me o_o/
01:22:336 (2) - maybe too much off from flow? fixed
01:58:909 (2,3) - spacing looks little too sharp right here? fixed
03:01:437 (1,1) - repeating slider doenst look like it fits here? just do another 1/2 slider i guess, or maybe something you did later on at 03:12:224 (1,1,1) - but I'd still go for 1/2 slider anyway
04:23:853 (1,1,2,1,2,3) - I don't get what shape or flow what you are trying to make here, honestly looks bit bad for me
lol some next level map I never expect though, interesting o.o
since I can't play this at all I kinda can't tell if anything is going wrong or right :>
wish you luck!
what is so surprising? the map is pretty unpolishedBeomsan wrote:
oh bubble pop? what the
Some I agree. Just a sadness.Lethargy wrote:
what is so surprising? the map is pretty unpolished
Thank you, -Lemons!-Lemons wrote:
WeeAestheticsYou asked me to look at blankets and whatnot so here you go<3
00:03:628 (6) - http://puu.sh/k2lyS/fd95a5fb46.jpg move it slightly over and bring up the anchor point for a better blanket
00:05:145 (1) - move the middle anchor to 448|304 , the big curve on that slider feels off to me
00:05:651 (3) - Rotate 6 degrees so it leads into the slider better, then move it to 180|272 for the blanket fixed
00:08:684 (4,5) - I don't like the placement of these, it feels like a really harsh flow for this part http://puu.sh/k2m1B/3d5f002500.jpg I think moving 00:08:684 (4) - to 196|268 winds up with a much better flow and it makes use of the curve on 00:09:022 (6) - fixed
00:11:550 (4) - Move this to 256|40, having it so close feels weird
00:19:471 (4,5) - http://puu.sh/k2nIa/84d39b6048.jpg
00:22:673 (1) - I would just make this a curved slider or make it completely blanket around 00:22:336 (3) - slider end, the current one looks a little funky fixed
00:25:875 (3,5) - http://puu.sh/k2nSQ/9f62614cbd.jpg I adjusted the last red anchor point to be closer to 5 and then moved the last white anchor point down slightly for a better blanket
00:28:404 (2,3,1) - polish 3 so that way the curve is the same as 2 and have it be a perfect blanket over the red slider that comes up like this http://puu.sh/k2lkk/e52b5f67a4.jpg
00:29:920 (2,3,4,5) - something like this makes the curve on the end of the slider 5 look better http://puu.sh/k2lpN/ea79dad0ed.jpg
00:34:640 (1,3) - These two sliders look a little off to me in the way they rest together but I don't really have a good suggestion
changed a little
00:40:707 (1,2,3,4,5) - the flow here is pretty janky, specifically in the back and forth from 4-5-1 don't know if I like it or not
00:44:246 (1,2) - Move both of these together so you don't break the blanket, but have 1 rest on the slider head of 00:43:572 (2) -
00:58:741 (2) - move the end anchor to 184|368 for a tighter blanket fixed
01:05:819 (1,3) - You could probably blanket the sliderhead of 3 with the curve at the end of 1 (if you did this you'd have to move 01:06:325 (3,4,1,2,3,1,2) - all of this with it as well, to keep everything looking pretty, so totally up to you)
01:08:179 (2,2) - http://puu.sh/k2pnH/e3d65179ac.jpg
02:05:482 (2,3) - these two seem awfully close but the blanket is fine it's just a very close up blanket and the rest of them are about the same distance
typically
02:08:684 (4) - Now I know that 4 is stacked on the end of the 2 slider, but I think having it be blanketed by the large curve on 3 winds up looking better, plus it makes use of that nice slider design that otherwise is just a very simple blanket on the end of 3 into 2. http://puu.sh/k2q7P/ea468ee085.jpg you could also just remake the slider design on 2 so it rests in the area. http://puu.sh/k2qfS/3e71fab1df.jpg I do know that doing something like this makes the jump from 2-3 a little smaller but obviously it's up to you
02:42:224 (2,3,1,2,1) - This here looks amazing and I love it to bits, however, but I think if you rotate 02:42:224 (2) - by -40 and then move the sliders so that way the spacing is the same it winds up looking even better as then you make use of the hole in 1. http://puu.sh/k2rxF/dadd88f638.jpg if you do this BE CAREFUL WITH 02:42:898 (1) - as it can go offscreen, i'd suggest if you do this just take the entire combo 02:41:381 (1,2,3,1,2,1) - and moving it up slightly
02:59:078 (1,1) - the angle of these two is slightly off if you wanted them to be parallel http://puu.sh/k2qL4/9352d5622a.jpg
04:39:527 (2) - move to 364|308 for a blanket on 1 and then move 04:40:201 (1) - to 380|128 to blanket it all nice and tidy fixed
should be all I can see that could need any sort of changes
@slick - I had said this before, and lately I considered it a part of the mapping style so brushed it off, but I guess it could be better.Cherry Blossom wrote:
1/2 and 1/4 which are difficult to recognize.
Possible sure, diffspiking at the last minute of the map when there was a previous kiai of the exact same intensity? Not so sure. I'd like your part if the whole map was harder, but as of here it is a 4+ min killer.Midge wrote:
here's a reminder that my part is confirmed possible
[Grimoire]Cherry Blossom wrote:
There is also a lot of "mapping quality issues", i highly recommend you to improve your map before getting it bubbled.
sliderslide & sliderticks fixedCherry Blossom wrote:
I'm lazy to bubble pop, just.
You can't silence both sliderticks and sliderslides together, i see a lot of sliders which have both silenced (consider 5% is silenced).
There is also a lot of "mapping quality issues" with 1/2 and 1/4 which are difficult to recognize. I don't really have time to check your map, but i highly recommend you to improve your map before getting it bubbled.
If i have time in future, i could help you with your map.
Good Luck ~
Arphimigon wrote:
00:30:089 (3,4,5) - These honestly need more spacing, clear vocal here. It was increased a lot more 00:19:302 (3,4,5) - there. Another reason for the change is to separate it from this small distancing 00:29:246 (1,2) - here by making it larger than that small spacing you can separate the clearly expressed vocal. fixed
15:46 Slick: i'm back
15:46 Inyuschan: nice o3o
15:48 Inyuschan: well I guess you're ok with irc
15:49 Slick: yup
15:49 Inyuschan: (btw Kenterz is not BN anymore xD)
15:49 Slick: are you serious?
15:49 Slick: FUCK
15:49 Slick: okay
15:49 Inyuschan: yeah
15:49 Slick: mackenzie will qualify
15:50 Slick: but he's sooo lazy
15:50 Slick: inactive for 5 days
15:50 Inyuschan: like me
15:50 Inyuschan: I'm lazy
15:50 Inyuschan: OTL
15:50 Slick: :c
15:50 Slick: why did kenterz get removed?
15:50 Slick: inactivity as BN?
15:50 Inyuschan: yes
15:50 Inyuschan: many people has been removed
15:50 Inyuschan: indeed
15:51 Slick: hmm
15:51 Slick: i hope mackenzie will be online soon
15:51 Slick: or not removed from BN lol
15:52 Inyuschan: whatever
15:52 *Inyuschan is editing [http://osu.ppy.sh/b/731905 Rita - Bookmark Memories [Grimoire]]
15:53 Inyuschan: why not custom colours?
15:53 Inyuschan: lol
15:53 Inyuschan: fitting with BG/SB
15:53 Inyuschan: or something D:
15:53 Slick: hmm default works good
15:54 Slick: i like default colors
15:55 Inyuschan: 00:25:370 (1,2) - this stack looks weird for me somehow
15:55 Inyuschan: a bit unreadable I'd say
15:55 Slick: 00:25:370 (1,2) - many people have mentioned this
15:55 Slick: i've tried a lot of different things but i truly think it plays best where it is now
15:56 Inyuschan: lol it's your first map?
15:56 Slick: hmm for upload yeah
15:57 Inyuschan: 00:49:555 (8) - can't hear anything here, I'd remove it
15:57 Inyuschan: I noticed
15:57 Inyuschan: xD
15:57 Inyuschan: hopefully you'll improve more
15:57 Inyuschan: the map doesn't convence me after all
15:57 Slick: 02:17:111 (9,10) - same here?
15:57 Inyuschan: there sounds fine for me
15:57 Inyuschan: wait
15:58 Slick: lol it's the same
15:58 Slick: 02:25:875 (2,3) - here also?
15:58 Inyuschan: it's not the same at least for me
15:58 Inyuschan: there is fine... you can leave (8) there
15:58 Inyuschan: I think it's fine after all
15:59 Inyuschan: due to vocal
15:59 Slick: i think so too
15:59 Inyuschan: 00:51:999 (4,5,1) - wtf lol
15:59 Inyuschan: weird pattern xD
15:59 Slick: yeah
15:59 Slick: i can remake it into something better
15:59 Slick: i will do it
16:00 Inyuschan: 00:54:359 (3,4) - weird overlap
16:00 Slick: should i move 00:54:359 (3) - more right
16:01 Inyuschan: maybe
16:01 Inyuschan: 01:26:718 (3) - hard to read
16:01 Slick: 01:31:774 (1,2,3) - make it the same as this?
16:01 Slick: easier to read
16:02 Inyuschan: maybe
16:04 Inyuschan: I'm not sure about bubbling honestly lol
16:05 Slick: please don't bail
16:05 Slick: so many beatmap nominators has left this map
16:05 Slick: people who were intially willing to bubble
16:05 Slick: but didn't because the map is scary
16:05 Slick: this video is for you
16:05 Slick: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXsQAXx_ao0
16:06 Inyuschan: first of all
16:06 Inyuschan: never force a BN to do something if he/she doesn't want
16:06 Inyuschan: or if he/she is not sure
16:06 Slick: yeah
16:06 Slick: sorry
16:08 Inyuschan: I don't mean I don't like the map, it's fun to play and looks nice
16:08 Inyuschan: I just don't agree with some rhythm and many BN can say the same
16:09 Inyuschan: also
16:09 Inyuschan: you use a lot of repetitive sliders o.o
16:09 Slick: what rhythm seems? weird to you?
16:11 Inyuschan: for example this one
16:11 Inyuschan: 02:19:808 (1) -
16:11 Inyuschan: it's just an example
16:11 Inyuschan: you're skipping totally the vocal while you follow it many times
16:11 Inyuschan: for example I don't agree with that
16:11 Inyuschan: anyways, I'm done with this, go and update
16:11 Inyuschan: I'll post this
16:12 Slick: skipping the vocal?
16:12 Slick: do you mean slider should be longer lol?
16:12 Slick: updating
16:12 Inyuschan: no I mean
16:12 Inyuschan: 02:19:977 -
16:12 Inyuschan: you didn't map that vocal xD
16:13 Slick: 02:19:977 - new vocal starting here?
16:13 Slick: i don't hear any new vocal ;w;
16:13 Slick: 02:19:808 (1) - i only hear one vocal starting here
16:14 Inyuschan: uh okay I didn't mean vocal
16:14 Inyuschan: but
16:14 Inyuschan: how can I explain it
16:14 Slick: you mean violin?
16:14 Inyuschan: there's a sound which it's not mapped and I miss it
16:14 Inyuschan: did you update?
16:14 Slick: yeah some synth sound of some kind , i can hear it too
16:15 Slick: not yet
16:15 Slick: 00:51:999 (4,5,1) - i can't find pattern for this
16:15 Inyuschan: don't really know xD
16:16 Inyuschan: I'll edit my post anyway