Cherry Blossom wrote:
1/2 and 1/4 which are difficult to recognize.
@slick - I had said this before, and lately I considered it a part of the mapping style so brushed it off, but I guess it could be better.
Midge wrote:
here's a reminder that my part is confirmed possible
Possible sure, diffspiking at the last minute of the map when there was a previous kiai of the exact same intensity? Not so sure. I'd like your part if the whole map was harder, but as of here it is a 4+ min killer.
Cherry Blossom wrote:
There is also a lot of "mapping quality issues", i highly recommend you to improve your map before getting it bubbled.
[Grimoire]
I'm going to go over big points ayy
00:04:471 (4,5,6) - This is spaced 1/4, there is no other spaced 1/4 in this section, although vaguely justifiable it is inconsistency in this part and either all parts should be spaced or none. Also this has a lower pitch than most the others too, so it would be logical to remove the spacing here.
00:06:325 (6,1,2,3,4) - Because of oval flow here, Slider start 4 seems too far left and it ends up a flow breaker. Move slider 4 more left along with the triples, ideally 384|284 would be great, but because of the leading next pattern and avoiding remaps, 304|296 for the slider start may suffice or slightly lower.
00:10:370 (7) - Please don't make this a clickable note, its weaker than the previous note and feels odd too in that motion. 00:10:201 (6) - Extend this as a slider instead.
00:30:089 (3,4,5) - These honestly need more spacing, clear vocal here. It was increased a lot more 00:19:302 (3,4,5) - there. Another reason for the change is to separate it from this small distancing 00:29:246 (1,2) - here by making it larger than that small spacing you can separate the clearly expressed vocal.
00:43:235 (1,2) - Way too large of a 1/4 snap for an early calm point like this with little punchy vocal. Not only is the spacing extreme, but the flow breaks by having to add a weird snap too to start the slider from the last. I'd change 00:43:235 (1,2,3) - this whole part into being a lot less snappy in the first two sliders, and possibly with more consistent spacing between each of the sliders with similar flow.
00:51:831 - I feel as though there has been this nagging sound gasping to be there, perhaps reduce the slider length and add a note to make a sort of slider that ends with a triple, or a slider than has a 1/2 break to the next note
00:54:190 - Vocal here should mean that the slider starts here not next, or consistency with 00:46:943 (1,2) - I think this would be best, as these things should at least come up at an even amount of times (do it twice then change) and either way it would be simpler. I can see why you would not want to add this though, that's fine.
00:56:802 (2) - This note makes a lot of sense on a sightread but it really isn't actually there and makes just as much sense without it, remove this note and add more spacing to the next 1/2 note.
00:58:404 (1,2,1) - After all the last long sliders, I feel there has been enough. These follow the held vocal, but I'd abuse the fact that the last slider has 1) lower pitch and 2) easy and clear instruments to make it shorter by 1/4. I also think a small mini-jump from 00:59:078 (1) - to the next note can be a great gateway into the forthcoming jumps.
01:00:089 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - Personally this part for me is a little distasteful for multiple reasons. This slider 01:00:426 (1) - feels all too complex to want to focus on after the sudden stream spacing, I would rather play a simple curve or line but nothing I may have to think twice about with leniency/speed, so I' simplify the slider. Next of all 01:00:426 (1,2,3,4,5) - the triples angle of play doesn't entirely compliment the angle needed to get to it, as 4 and 5 are to far to the left.
01:03:797 (4,5) - (rare cases for good extended sliders) you can represent these similar like held vocals with two 3/4 sliders imo, both are pretty similar, the second is lower pitch slightly but that isn't too big of a deal.
01:19:808 (2) - Too slow too sudden, would increase to around 0.85 or 0.9 if you truly want the decrease to show the lower pitch and held vocal, but not 0.75 as that can actually be offputting
01:22:336 (2) - Due to various playstyles and my own personal experience, corner notes are annoying as hell. In the corners spacing feels much higher than the center. It's fine to use the sides and corners but flow/spacing is real weird there, as from experience I'd say move the note to 36|80. Your call.
01:28:572 (1) - This Sv change is fine to represent the music but again it is a little high. I know you can play this whole slider without moving your cursor but it may come as a shock either way (I actually as a mater of fact got an 100 first time I ever played this...) reduce to 0.75 or 0.8, as 0.55 -> 0.9 is hella high
01:31:774 (1,2,3) - Curvy, 01:26:381 (2,3,4) - snappy. Please choose one for this sound. I prefer the first as the sounds are short, and well... snappy.
01:52:336 (2,3,4) - This is a little problematic. I like how it fits missed beats but it feels overmapped in a tapping sense. My only solution would be to make either one of 01:52:336 (2,3) - a slider or make the first a reverse. Personally I would make the first a slider and add a note.
02:02:786 (3) - This feels totally out of place, there is a lack of need for an extended slider at this time (were you trying to cover 02:02:617 - ?) making 02:02:954 - feel empty and I think that should have a sound played.
02:03:460 (6) - Whatever sound you decided to make this 1.28x SV on is hardly audible, and the slider should definately have lower SV. Definately makes reading the 1/4 gap (which is massive) a hard job
02:27:055 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - This is okay, but the slider angle is hard to hit after the jump from 3 to 4. Try this, it adds more curved flow and doesnt require remapping stuff:
02:29:415 - to 02:55:538 - should have much lower SV, it's so much calmer without constant kicks and has rather high SV for the music. I can't ask to remap, but just know I find that whole section too fast.
02:56:044 (1,2,1) - This was much more fitting when it was a stream
02:56:381 (1) - 3/4 slider and a note fits much more nicely here as 02:56:718 - is a clear clickable beat
03:03:797 (7,8,9) - NC either the 7 note or the 9 slider to further emphasize that epic electric sound as well as the current jagged slider?
03:05:145 (4,1,2) - This is kinda unreadable... the flow of going back and forth isn't really normal with 1/4 and I'd suggest moving 1 and 2 more right to make it seem easier to read
03:56:381 (3,4) -
This spacing is way... way too high in conjunction with this flow-breaker this means you have to stop the curve of the slider to snap out iinto that next slider start, which in fact is near a side, with a higher spacing than most the other 1/4. Plently of reasons to make either the curve point more at the next slider, or reduce the distance.
03:56:718 (4,1) - This I'm not too sure about, since the straight movement can be more easily changed with another straight one. But my bets on it I'd still reduce to not add too much of a spike from the last one before.
04:29:499 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - You already know what I'm thinking but, simply use and easier pattern. You can start like this but not a whole 16 notes.
Enjoy