pieguy1372 wrote:

uh, you didn't have to entirely remove the silent hitnormal. all you had to do to fix it was just add any kind of hitsound at the silent notes i point out. oh well ._.

Kurokami wrote:

Popping the bubble because of various reason.

Audio: The bitrate is 182 variable which is not the best choice to work with. It can be accepted but using a 192 constant one would be better.

This is not DQ issue.... its clearly state 128 ~ 192, i wont change it, i have knowledge in audio stuff and music things and 192 wont give u much different result that can be distinguished by human's hearing

Background: I recommend you to only use one background file on all difficulties. You can make your combo colors fit to that background and yet they will be consistent as well.

Again, recommend is not a DQ issue, why bother? most people play with dim BG after all, furthermore it use video.... the combo colour is consistent if you know what im doing... im using only 4 colour for each goddess.


Patterns: The patterns are boring in overall. You used the same ones across the difficulties like 00:01:290 (1,2,3,4,5,6) (Rain), 00:01:290 (1,2,3,4,5,6) (Platter) and so on. I can understand that you want to use easy patterns but I just can't believe you can't think about other than these. And 00:19:290 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,1,2) can be totally fine as a spinner or just the as your usual patterning. Using a stream here is more like an overmap, not really fit into Platter nor Salad. And comparing this part with Cup, its seriously overmapped.
Rhythm: Since you used the same patterns everywhere the rhythm in not really differentiate. It would be better to make it a little more different between difficulties. You used many 1/2 triplet everywhere which makes the rhythm really bad.

First.... its same but its clearly different on HOW you catch it, its not even same to me... its clearly show the pattern on how its easy to
insane CHANGE!! dude... you are not me! you cannot force your mapping into my mapping.....

and why you should say " I just can't believe you can't think about other than these"
in other words you want to say that im stupid?
didnt u already realize that i like that pattern BETTER to emphasize that rhythm??
let me tell you, a triplet can only be map with stair(/ or \), trill ( < or > ) and vertical ( | ) , or mix of trill and vertical....
once again, you are not me, and there's no same person in the world.

OVERMAP? that part? first... it has 1/4 hihat sound,
second, it has build up wind noise sound, at first it could be 1/8 but i've already nerfed it till this update.

So tell me once again in red words, what is DQ Issue to u guys with a good reason.

I already mentioned a few from these 3 months ago and most of them can be fixed by now. If you can fix them or at least make changes feel free to call me back to make a deeper look and fix the bubble.

Genocide wrote:

we can't force about pattern, it should be back to mapper to considering about it.

edit:

Would be nice if we leave an opinions

Sey wrote:

Lordraika, why are you often so impatient, rude and offensive when a map got its first bubble pop? That attitude won't make you help to get any more BNs. Popping a bubble is part of our job, and as far as I see Kuro's pop had good reasons. Instead of declining everything I advice you to go through his check more serious, it has a point.
The mapset is clearly not ready yet, again you wanted to rush it through the qualify process, but it doesn't work that way.

1. Audio: You said as long as the audio it between 128-192 is fine and you wont change it. I think you should consider changing it http://puu.sh/gCvxb/6fdfbcb082.png. The bitrate is just over 192 (look at the bottom left corner) and there is even 235 there. As I said, variable bitrate is not accepted.

Kurokami wrote:

[General]
[Cup]

00:04:186 (5,1) - This movement is very uncomfortable. There are two option to make the flow a little better by either moving (1,2,3) to right or rotate (5)'s tail to left.

Rotate (5)'s tail then, next 123 will make me have to reposition all pattern ahead

00:09:979 (3,4) - Why not just one long slider? It would break the 1/2 spam at this part just nicely.

Sure, thx to this i repattern all stuff ahead.

00:39:358 (1,2,3) - According to your previous combo the movement here is a bit weird. Try this instead: http://puu.sh/gCwsP/b781edc98e.png

yep, i know that the flow should be something like left right left right here, so i change it a bit, but well... back to what it should be.



[Salad]

00:07:703 (6,7,8,1) - The flow here is really terrible and the pattern looks bad. I suggest you something like: http://puu.sh/gCwCj/74a503cc37.png. And (2) can be moved to x:344.

At first, i suppose vertical should be easier, and less mvement, but doing that ^ above, will make it simple walk, on my scd thought that will be probably best, and i dont move (2). this flow is good as it is

00:19:290 (3) - What the fuck is this? Why are you so persistent about that noise in the background while the white ticks with drum are much more stronger? Your current slider follows both and none at the same time. The noise is a continuous sound which requires a spinner or a long slider while the drums are just on white ticks. The red ticks has almost nothing to do at this part. This: http://puu.sh/gCwSG/29cab7101a.png follows the rhythm you followed until now much better and it fits into your current timeline.

*sigh* , spinner for this is too short, no slider unless a good slider movement for this, but rather choose simple pattern following the previous one,

00:46:807 (1,2,3,4,5) - This is again looks a bit bad. How about this instead: http://puu.sh/gCx2m/e75496bd69.png

nooo, thats technically same,
no because it has 1/1 Blank to made up the direction change, i knw what you aim for the direction flow for that screenshot but no,
instead i make the curve a bit more vertical

00:52:393 (4,5) - A jump would be nice here.

i add some distance , but i doubt this will make the jump that u want, since (5) already hitting the wall

00:54:462 (1,2) - Here can be a jump as the vocal has a little jump as well.
00:55:290 (2,3) - ^

this pattern alone need a good walk control, adding jump while focusing on a good walk here will make it too hard imo
as for the current one, i aim it should be all walk but with a good control of it

01:20:738 (1) - Its really bad to end you spinner at 01:24:048 as the next part of the song starts there. Please end it at 01:23:634 instead and just add a circle where it ends now. (If you apply it please do it on other difficulties as well.)

Sure, then only on cup to fix...

01:27:565 (6) - NC

no... especially its same structure sound, splitting it here would be a bit weird and you are not telling me for other dif as well, so no...

[Platter]

00:21:565 til 00:33:979 - Why there is only one jump? Its a calm part that is true but a few little jump can be placed to follow some nice vocal part. For example: 00:22:393 (3,1) -, 00:24:048 (2,1) -, 00:25:703 (2,1) -, 00:29:014 (3,1) -, 00:31:083 (1,2,3,1) -. This is a Platter after all and not a Salad.

k

00:34:393 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - You followed everything with circles at this part which makes it really weird since both the vocal and music requires has its own jump pattern yet you only followed the vocal and just the half of it with HDash. If you want to use the vocals as jump trigger (which is a very nice idea) please only use these 00:34:393 (3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - as circle and merge every other into a slider. Also it would be nice to have a little jump on every (1) then HDash to (2). This way there will be some consistency and the vocal will be nicely followed.
00:40:807 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Same as before.

Easily fixed this, i like emphasizing slider to different sound with circle as well, like i did a Long note and single note in mania.

00:44:531 (3,4) - HDash?
00:45:772 (2,3) - This can be a HDash as well.

i would like to keep 00:44:738 (4,5) - Hdash,
Doing (3)(4) for Hdash means i should hold dash all the way till (5) and i should have a good timing to turn while keeping Hdash,
but this is a bit hard, but i already did or use this on Rain, so no change here.

00:46:807 (1,2,3,4,5) - This pattern is though easy to catch but maybe too extreme for Platter. Lower that HDash a little bit til it is still a HDash but a calmer one.

reduce the distance as close as possible while i keep the distance not to far to 00:47:634 (1) - for easier catch while player might need some time to recover for the Hdash.

00:52:600 (1,2) - Can be HDash.
01:02:739 (2,3) - ^

umm, no, but i make it more jumpy

01:14:117 til 01:26:531 - is exactly the same as at the start of the song. It would be better to use the same timeline with different patterns. Right now the timeline is terrible.

i rearrange the slider here


01:12:462 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Dafaq. Just follow the vocal please.
00:19:290 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,1,2) - As I already mentioned on Salad, something like this not fits well. 1/4 usage just makes no sense.

can see that you are very picky at this one, so i will remake it...
Also notice that platter has a huge change since i updated it with my latest mapping style.





[Rain]

00:07:290 (5,6,7,8,1) - This is makes no sense here. Yes, its easy to catch but that is not a valid reason. Those HDashes are following nothing from the song. The only valid HDash is between (8,1) everything else needs to be wiped out.

"no sense" is really harsh here, i would like to have dash on all of it, the best way is to use equal Hdash is better, while in my experience on testing ... making a full dash only pattern is really hard, and have a huge chance of miss, while this Hdash ensure you to get to the next fruit if this is unrankable issue, i would like to see the best option for this and i will be glad to accept it....

00:17:014 (5,6) - (6) should be on the left side of (5) to make better flow.

no since i have to remake whole next structure for this 1 note.

00:33:979 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - The usage of HDashes is really weird at this part. What I said on Platter applies here as well. It would be better to use that with more jump here as well.

orz
please, cant you see or notice the Hdash is following the music on white tick??????
just like i follow the loud kick here :
01:12:669 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - You want to use this? Fine. But it would be better to make it symmetrical. It creates a better flow that way and better to look at it.

Sry, i tried symmetrical but it needs two Hdash of different angle, make it twice harder while turning to symmetrical part, i cant play properly this way, so no change.

00:39:152 (1) - This note is just don't fit into your current timeline. You followed the vocals yet this note only follows a weak sound from the music. Wipe it out.

I exoect you give me more option for this, if i just delete this, i cant have the left right left right flow here, it weirds if i jst have to stand and wait while this is rain. sry no change as well....

00:40:186 (4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - Again a weird HDash usage.

Im sure you notice this Hdash is already well "patterned", but ok, i will rearranged them....
Really like it now eventhou it needs some timing skill on it....

00:46:807 (1,2,3,4) - It would be better to make this a little more less edgy.

This is the full dash pattern i mean before, making one is hard and it has chance of missing it if not timed properly...
and sure i try to reduce the (3) for less turning point is needed.

00:50:945 (6,1) - HDash.
00:51:772 (2,3) - ^
00:52:186 (3,4) - ^

this ... suddenly became full Hdash section, its easy i just hope someone wont say i spam Hdash on it.

00:53:014 (5,6,7) - The HDash between (6,7) is very nice but it would be nicer if you add a little jump at (5,6) as well since all of them following the drums.

i got your point, i make something new instead....

00:54:462 (1,2) - HDash.
00:55:290 (2,3) - ^
00:56:117 (2,3,4) - All of them can be HDashed.
01:05:014 (2,3) - It would be nice to make these similar to 01:03:773 (5,6) just with different directions.

Sure

01:27:358 (5,6) - HDash for what? There is nothing to be followed with it.

Pattern..., and make it different with other dif...

There are a few more misused or missed jump and some pattern still can be better but I'm tired already. I'm looking at this set for 2 hours already. q.q And I need to go to work in 30 minutes as well.

No problem, thx for the mod, replying mod and recheck stuff, mapping while testing it over and over again need tons of time as well...
and so, i jst finished this likee within more than 4 hour i believe.... i never take mapping lightly... im sure all of them now are very lovely.

[]


as for the mp3...

1. Audio: You said as long as the audio it between 128-192 is fine and you wont change it. I think you should consider changing it http://puu.sh/gCvxb/6fdfbcb082.png. The bitrate is just over 192 (look at the bottom left corner) and there is even 235 there. As I said, variable bitrate is not accepted.

I finished apply the mod first, then.... :
1st. no its still 182
2nd. i try... i TRY IT once again, make a 192 one, open it with 182 one and make the offset same with 182, export once again, AND.... NO HOPE...
the offset is off, 40 ~ 55ms is not a joke....

after u finished check what i change while the offset link is still valid, i will find the right time and try to do smthg bout the mp3

Kurokami wrote:

Let's see if we can rank this finally (though I can only rebubble this).

[Platter]

00:19:910 (5) - Definitely no go on Platter. This kind of slider requires a very good timing to SS it and Platter is still just for introducing harder patterns. Sure, its looks easy for us, but try to look at it with newbies eye. Make this slider shorter please.

SURE things if its acceptable after i shorten it, then i will do it ^^

01:12:462 (2,3) - WTF! There is nothing which needs to be followed with HDash here. Just a weak vocal. Remove the HDash. And by the way, the double HDash pattern is too hard on this level.
01:13:496 (5,6) - ^ Same here.

what did i follow? its actually the LOUD cymbal and melody not the vocal... the slider is just to emphasize the long vocal...
but i do AGREE that double Hdash is a bit hard , it require good timing of full left right dash control... i change it into 1 Hdash for each, its still following the music's cymbal.

[Rain]

00:19:496 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I would like to point this out as well but I know you won't change it. q.q Something like: http://puu.sh/hJdrf/2831d08998.png would be better but meh.

well... then just let me keep it XD i really enjoy this pattern and satisfy on what i mapped here, also there... my friend enjoy it as well...
in Rain, i change the pattern around here 00:40:807 - to make the Hdash easier.

01:12:669 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Well, we already discussed this but I don't like the flow here. The rhythm is hard to follow already so better to make the pattern better and easier to handle. Something like ( ) could work here. Or alternative try this: http://puu.sh/hJdl9/d442b411cd.png.
[]

as for this , i can agree for much more simple pattern... hope it looks perfect now



Just call me back if you think you checked everything here.

General

1. Difficulty Spread : ☑
2. Unsnapped objects : ☑
3. Audio bitrate over 192 kbps : ☑
4. Metadata Issues : ☑
5. Unwanted Content : Actually I'm unsure about the video in the mapset. Could you ask some QATs if it is fine or not?
6. Timeline Issues : ☑
7. Combo Colors : ☑
8. Unused hitsounds : Found unused .wav files:
   1. lr3_kick wbds.wav
   2. lr3_fxdsrpf - l.wav
   3. lr_kick low strong beat.wav
   4. lr3_bassdropssg.wav
   5. lr3_fxdsrpf - r.wav
   6. normal-slidertick.wav
   7. lr3_hat ocv.wav
9. Hitsounds Issues :
   1. Every .wav file must be at least 100ms long. normal-hitfinish has only 40ms of length which is unrankable. Add this in the folder instead
   2. normal-hitwhistle has more than 5ms of delay(a bit more than 15ms) which is unrankable. Use this instead
10. Inaudible hitsounds : ☑

Cup

1. 01:12:669 - unnecessary inherited point here
2. 01:12:462 (1,2,3,4) - As it comes right after the spinner, I'd reduce the distance for a bit to make it easier

Salad

1. 00:26:117 (1,2) - I'd avoid using 3/4 rhythm in salad diff
2. 00:35:014 (1,2) - This is quite harsh considering it's salad. Ctrl+g and reduce the distance
3. 00:35:841 (1,2) - ^
4. 00:36:669 (1,2) - ^
5. 00:40:807 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Reduce the distances a little bit
6. 00:46:807 (1,2,3,4,5) - Using 1/4 in the salad isn't really recommended. I'd rather use 1/2 here(also the 1/4 jump for 4 to 5 can be a problem as well)
7. 01:24:048 (1) - Move note to where the spinner ends.
8. 01:24:462 (1) - The NC seems unnecessary. Could you remove it?

Platter

1. 00:07:703 (6,7,8,1) - The jump for 8 to 1 is pretty unexpected. Consider moving 1 to a bit right
2. 00:19:910 (5) - The timeline here feels weird. I'd remove SV change here and put slider's end on 00:20:324 -
3. 01:12:876 (3) - It plays not really good as it's kinda lack of movement. Try this
4. 01:13:703 (6) - Here's the same. I'd move slider's head to the left slightly
5. 01:17:841 (2) - The vertical one here breaks the flow imo. Make it horizontal instead?
6. 01:18:669 (2) - I felt the same here, make it horizontal
7. 01:20:738 (6) - The NC here is quite messed up. I'd remove NC on 01:20:945 - but add new one on 01:20:738 -
   

Rain

1. 00:10:393 (6,7,8) - Expecting a bit more extreme movement here.
2. 00:13:703 (6,7,8) - The same as above. Wouldn't it be better if you put a little more spacing for notes?
3. 00:17:014 (5,6) - It's lack of movement for 5 to 6. I'd rather move 6 to the left side, for instance x:224
4. 00:40:600 (5) - I'd move this to about x:330 to make this part plays better
5. 00:41:221 (3,4) - Missing hdash between them
6. 00:42:876 (3,4) - Adding hdash is highly recommended
7. 00:53:014 (5) - I'm unsure about this slider as there's no reason to keep fast slider here. There's not even a strong vocal sound to emphasize actually.
8. 01:17:014 (4) - The movement here feels kinda plain. Try ctrl+g for it
9. 01:17:014 (4,5,1) - If you agree with the above suggestion, try this to make the part better
10. 01:26:738 (1) - How about moving this to about x:217 to prevent unnatural movement caused by lack of spacing between 4 and 1? also it'd be better to catch 2~5

Shadow Fear wrote:

For Rain

00:10:393 (6,7,8) - http://puu.sh/ihUGY/e64d67224d.jpg [Sorry Puush for my PC is retarded abit]
00:13:703 (6,7,8) - Same as above [Repeat Design]
Ok


00:17:014 (5,6) - http://puu.sh/ihUSA/75df874bca.jpg
00:17:841 (1,2) - http://puu.sh/ihUVM/936fea1a36.jpg
Move them on similar pattern~


00:20:634 (4,5) - http://puu.sh/ihV1O/a3969d7249.jpg
Move it a bit further


00:29:427 (1,2,3,4,1) - Heavily modified (test it out) - 1) http://puu.sh/ihVoA/70c63dd38d.jpg
2) http://puu.sh/ihVpc/4c7cb3e840.jpg
3) http://puu.sh/ihVq7/759b5417b8.jpg
Sure, but nerf the last slider sharp curve a bit

01:27:979 (9,10,11) - http://puu.sh/ihVy8/efb5af755f.jpg
Thank you.
Sure Thanks for the feedback, sry for late respond... X_X

Spectator wrote:

General

1. Unwanted Content : Actually I'm unsure about the video in the mapset. Could you ask some QATs if it is fine or not?
   Ive asked CLSW, let see what will he say...
   but imo, this is not a problem thou , cant see why its unsafe ... since the video is so adorable >w<
   
2. Hitsounds Issues :
   1. Every .wav file must be at least 100ms long. normal-hitfinish has only 40ms of length which is unrankable. Add this in the folder instead
   2. normal-hitwhistle has more than 5ms of delay(a bit more than 15ms) which is unrankable. Use this instead
   Damn, my fault, i usually never leave any single hitsound file have issue, sry i fix it myself... thanks for the notice.
   
3. Unused hitsounds : Found unused .wav files:
   • Okay, but ... i used it properly, too lazy to rename into custom set and set timing.
   1. lr3_kick wbds.wav
   2. lr_kick low strong beat.wav
   3. lr3_bassdropssg.wav
      Used here : 00:46:807 (1,2,3,4,5) -
      
   4. lr3_fxdsrpf - l.wav
   5. lr3_fxdsrpf - r.wav
      Used here : 00:07:703 (6,7,8) -
      
   6. lr3_hat ocv.wav
      00:19:496 - and 01:12:772 - section
      
   7. normal-slidertick.wav
      Thanks, i found this useless since i dont use N timing at all XD , removed
   
   
   

   Cup

   1. 01:12:669 - unnecessary inherited point here
      Removed, XD
      
   2. 01:12:462 (1,2,3,4) - As it comes right after the spinner, I'd reduce the distance for a bit to make it easier
      made them closer now
   
   
   

   Salad

   1. 00:26:117 (1,2) - I'd avoid using 3/4 rhythm in salad diff
      ill make it 1/2 distance then ^^
      
   2. 00:35:014 (1,2) - This is quite harsh considering it's salad. Ctrl+g and reduce the distance
   3. 00:35:841 (1,2) - ^
   4. 00:36:669 (1,2) - ^
   5. 00:40:807 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Reduce the distances a little bit
      i reduce the distance for all, it can be walked by good timing, and yea... a bit dash is more safe, its a good way to let salad player get used to dash while its still easy and catchy, thats what i aim for ^^
      
   6. 00:46:807 (1,2,3,4,5) - Using 1/4 in the salad isn't really recommended. I'd rather use 1/2 here(also the 1/4 jump for 4 to 5 can be a problem as well)
      Sure, removed 1/4 rhythm.
      
   7. 01:24:048 (1) - Move note to where the spinner ends.
   8. 01:24:462 (1) - The NC seems unnecessary. Could you remove it?
      Move them closer, just a tiny bit XD , and removed
   
   
   

   Platter

   1. 00:07:703 (6,7,8,1) - The jump for 8 to 1 is pretty unexpected. Consider moving 1 to a bit right
      Sure...
      
   2. 00:19:910 (5) - The timeline here feels weird. I'd remove SV change here and put slider's end on 00:20:324 -
      oh, u mean the end of the slider, yea i can extend it, while keeping the effect , but i wont remove SV
      i want it to be full dash to catch this one
      
   3. 01:12:876 (3) - It plays not really good as it's kinda lack of movement. Try this
   4. 01:13:703 (6) - Here's the same. I'd move slider's head to the left slightly
      okay
      
   5. 01:17:841 (2) - The vertical one here breaks the flow imo. Make it horizontal instead?
   6. 01:18:669 (2) - I felt the same here, make it horizontal
      slightly changed them~
      
   7. 01:20:738 (6) - The NC here is quite messed up. I'd remove NC on 01:20:945 - but add new one on 01:20:738 -
      i actually emphasize the cymbal by breaking the fruit combo(split effect) but okay, removed
   
   
   

   Rain

   1. 00:10:393 (6,7,8) - Expecting a bit more extreme movement here.
   2. 00:13:703 (6,7,8) - The same as above. Wouldn't it be better if you put a little more spacing for notes?
   3. 00:17:014 (5,6) - It's lack of movement for 5 to 6. I'd rather move 6 to the left side, for instance x:224
      remake them , done
      
   4. 00:40:600 (5) - I'd move this to about x:330 to make this part plays better
      nice~
      
   5. 00:41:221 (3,4) - Missing hdash between them
   6. 00:42:876 (3,4) - Adding hdash is highly recommended
      oops, damn those one suppose to have Hdash , no wonder i miss often there XD thanks
      
   7. 00:53:014 (5) - I'm unsure about this slider as there's no reason to keep fast slider here. There's not even a strong vocal sound to emphasize actually.
      Remove then....
      
   8. 01:17:014 (4) - The movement here feels kinda plain. Try ctrl+g for it
   9. 01:17:014 (4,5,1) - If you agree with the above suggestion, try this to make the part better
      Ok
      
   10. 01:26:738 (1) - How about moving this to about x:217 to prevent unnatural movement caused by lack of spacing between 4 and 1? also it'd be better to catch 2~5
       I made them closer to each other

popped bubble as there are some unrankable issues

also don't forget to reply(at least reply) all the mods in the thread before the ranking process.

Quality Assurance Team wrote:

Disqualification Notice

Hello!

Unfortunately, the Quality Assurance Team has decided to disqualify this beatmap. The following is a list of reasons and examples for the disqualification. We do not outline every issue in detail, so make sure to take the idea behind each reason and apply it to the entire beatmap as issues might be found in more than the spots mentioned below. If you have any questions, please reply to this post and we will do our best to clarify any misunderstandings.

General

Incorrect Metadata

• 
  The source of the mapset should be "Choujigen Game Neptune THE ANIMATION", according to the official website : http://nep-anime.tv/ .

Changed to all dif~

Cup

Inappropriate usages of structures

• 
  Unacceptable continuous anti-flow movements with bigger scales than expected, they're pretty extreme. The flow should be changed with easier.

1. 00:14:531 (7,1,2,3,4,5,1,2) -
   anti flow is a bit wrong, if i keep on mapping the same pattern, NORMALLY other people will say, its became boring, repetitive,
   oh well... WHATever since i will change it....
2. 00:47:634 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) -
3. 01:00:876 (4,1,2,1,2,3) -
   Changed , that now it can be plate without even moving, changing it to normal / or \ will be damn repetitive across the whole reef, so its not an option, thus i expect this one should not be an issue at all....

Platter

Inappropriate usage of hyperdash

• 
  Usage of 1/4 HDash for bpm140↑ at Platter difficulty is unrankable. At least the shape of current pattern should be curved inwards, but it wasn't.

1. 00:47:117 (4,5) -
   Then, i can just change it into normal dash without need of HDash at all...
   same trick and play technique ^, both need to dash, but the previous one is UNRANKABLE issue which is a bit.... orz

Rain

Inappropriate usages of hyperdashes

1. 00:19:496 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - The hyperdashes at the positions except the last one are overdone, since the noise sounds at the background don't introduce well with its hyperdash flows.
   hmm... i will just simply remove the Hdash, and make it Normal Dash instead....
   i keep the 1/4 since i use it here as well >> 01:12:772 -
2. 00:33:979 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - Incorrect hyperdash placements, they should have snapped on clap-sound added objects.
   i know that you are trying to lead me on placing the Hdash on those clap but NO, im still following the song just fine, im sure this is not one of unrankable issue, i place this Hdash according to the sound and pattern that im using.

stryver12 wrote:

CAPSLOCK TIME
About the diffs.... I dunno what to say but I'm fine with them.

TheBronyGames wrote:

I'm a massive Hyperdimension Neptunia Fan, and I hang around #ctb a lot, so I want to spread this around. Sad it got DQ'ed, but in any case, take 2 of my stars. it's a fun mapset!

BoberOfDarkness wrote:

Just few random stufff from me

00:31:083 (1,2) - in my opinion the distance is too big for non hyper jump and so big jumps doesnt fit music (ofc in my opinion) I sugest you to move (2) closer

This one is nice, thanks for the great notice ^^

as for the rest, nope XD
my NC style is to break or give the burst effect while "playing"
notice that at end of combo, the catched fruit on the plate will burst out.... thats what i AIM especially for impact and cymbal


Cup and Platter backgrounds are <33333333333


Good luck!

Yuii- wrote:

It means so many things that you don't really want to know it (?)

Nah, just kidding. Basically you add one when you are sure you will bubble the map, it's sorta of a placeholder-y thing.

Yuii- wrote:

Placeholder then

00:37:496 (1,2) - (On Salad) This doesn't require any dash, you wanna keep it? It's quite inconsistent with the previous patterns.
yep, dont wnt to change it, since... 00:36:669 (1,2) - this pattern is kind a walkable as well "if" timed perfectly XD

00:47:014 (2,3) - (On Salad) Why this suddenly requires a dash when the previous Finish sounds are pretty much walkable? Remember that (3) is a downbeat, so it shouldn't be that emphasised in the map.
i will simply decrease their gap, and no need to long dash , ^^

01:03:773 (5,6,1,2,3) - (On Rain) I want to see different opinions in this part because it is impossible for me to catch them. I tried several times (like 10) and failed in all of them.
i feel the same... i got this pattern from kuro, but it need a full dash without letting go and full turning to catch it...
(this pattern is still too hard to me , so i reduce the length of the slider that player need to plate but still the same pattern ^^)


-----

Back~

Yuii- wrote:

I completely disagree with that bubble being popped. You are exaggerating things too much. The easier difficulties are fine, I have 200pp so I am considered as a "newbie" and I had no trouble with those things. But well, I guess you don't know how pops work

alienflybot wrote:

[ Cup]

• 
  Gameplay

1. 00:14:531 (7,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - Avoid using such pattern in Cup. Cup beginners will be scared of these difficult patterns. - How can that be scary? Seriously. The previous pattern is even harder because it requires the player to go to the left to right for a couple of seconds. And even with that, is still a poor excuse, there's a 1/1 break in the middle of every triplet, so isn't even "hard".
2. 01:20:738 (1) - End the spinner earlier, maybe at 01:23:221 so players can prepare here without making hasty decisions. - I would say "yes" in Standard, but I've seen a lot of maps being ranked with even less recovery time after a spinner on CtB. I've just tested and even if you are on the left side of the screen, you are still able to catch the following object without even dashing.

[ Salad]

• 
  Gameplay

1. 00:01:290 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - Remove these big jumps, as they are not really necessary here. - Oh, really? But why? They are super easy to catch, and why are the "unnecessary" or "not necessary"? What makes them being like that? The only one I would agree with is 00:01:703 (3,4) - since (4) isn't that emphasised in the background music, but even with that, it'd look quite unpolished.
2. 00:35:014 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Don't add small dashes between (1,2)s. It can be repetitive and also difficult for Salad beginners. - They are catchable without dashing.
3. 00:41:635 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - ^ - Such effort, didn't even press my Shift!
4. 01:08:738 (1,2,3,1,2,1) - Avoid straight-standing notes, they cause static movements and pretty hard to dash after catching them. What I mean static movements are something like 01:09:152 (2,3) - Wait a second, bud! Are you suggesting him to add another HDash or even a dash? You didn't say not to add dash-y movements in 1/2 patterns for this difficulty? Alright.
5. 01:13:290 (3,4) - Move (4) right a grid. The jump is too high in my opinion. - Isn't even dashable, if you press you dash, it's even easier to catch. Additionally, the pattern plays super good because 01:12:462 (1,2) - is already strong, but as this part goes on, at 01:13:290 (3,4) - it gets even stronger, so this is properly emphasised and plays good. By the way, one grid won't change that much, so it's super pointless.

[ Platter]

• 
  Gameplay

1. 00:07:083 (4,5) - Move (5) away from the edge and make (5) less-slanted, because the hyperdash is quite vigorous. - Wot? That would make things even harder, why would you suggest something like that? It doesn't make any sense, the current HDash helps a lot because you just have to hit the right corner, if you happen to move it a bit, you will miss. Even if is a harsh movement, you can catch it pretty easily and it doesn't require any accuracy at all. Although, I want to add that 00:07:841 (8,1,2) - plays quite bad because you have to stand still for the previous triplets and then dash again to catch (1,2). Just want to add, in case you didn't notice. ALL of the HDashes in this difficulty require the player to stick to any of the corners, so why would you only point out one?
2. 00:21:979 (2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - The distances of most of the notes can be shortened, it is so dash-demanding otherwise. - Alright, good. But what's the problem with this? Is this unrankable? Same happens with 00:28:186 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - and you didn't say anything. Which is the difference? This plays super comfortable and it's nice. Maybe some distances COULD be shortened in order to make it more nicer to the pace of the song as a whole, but he isn't really forced onto changing anything.
3. 00:46:807 (1,2,3,4,5) - Could be difficult to catch (3) and (5) especially. Shorten the distances please. - I think I should stop modding this.
4. 00:47:634 (1,2) - Lower the distance here, it is so big! - The bigger, the better, bud! \:D/ And what about 00:47:841 (2,3) - ? Your excuse is "but there is an HDash"? That's not how things work, after all the music requires a bigger and emphasised movement.
5. 00:48:462 (1,2) - Uhuh ^ - Hum hum, same.
6. 00:50:531 (5) - I find this doubtful because players may have to dash in order to catch the tail of (5). I recommend making it easier by omitting the small dash between the slider. - Hey! I agree with something, cool cool! Although I don't see anything bad in this, it's true that it can be quite counter-intuitive especially because you are only using it on 1 slider instead of using it on 00:50:945 (6) - too.
7. 01:03:773 (5) - ^ - Yeah, you could have include both in the same point, that makes mods more cleaner!

[ Rain]

• 
  Gameplay

1. 00:07:290 (5,6,7,8,1) - Ouch this hurts. The hyperdash allocation here is not even, and I don't suggest having a bunch of hyperdash here. It is much better to remove the hyperdash at (5,6,7) and keep the hyperdash at (8,1). - I have already answered this.
2. 00:09:979 (4,5) - Lower the distance here. - Since the popper isn't able to explain himself properly, I will tell you why. During this section you are not following the beats properly, for example in case you want to add a dash-y or even an HDash, you should follow beats. He is right on lowering 00:09:979 (4,5) - because (5) is a downbeat, so there's nothing worth emphasising onto that note. Same goes to a lot of objects in this section. All in all, I would suggest you to "remake" this pattern as a whole, and try to be consistent with it. You can't just make 00:09:358 (1,2,3) - 00:11:221 (1,2,3) - so different because they are the same, and changing it would produce players to misunderstand what you are trying to map.
3. 00:41:014 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - Kinda hyperdash spam here, yet I don't find these hyperdash works here, instead it feels like an over usage of hyperdash. Please refine the pattern and remove the hyperdashes, you can add hyperdash every 4 circles to make it fresh. - You really don't know how much I disagree with this. He's being completely consistent in this part yet it plays super good. He's placing the hypers on the downbeats and on every new combo, while keeping a neutral distance between (2,3) throughout the whole pattern. Why do you think this won't work?
4. 00:44:738 (4,5) - It is easy to miss the middle droplet of (4) as this part requires entire dashing. Please tilt (4) a bit to cope with that. - Yeah, this is basically the same as in Platter. Things like this should be avoided, I completely ignored this while modding it for the first time because I was literally able to catch them. I wouldn't call them as a "bad pattern" especially considering that we are in a Rain difficulty, so it is supposed to be quite harder than the previous difficulty yet this is your decision, Raiky.
5. 00:50:531 (5,6) - I know what you are trying to do here, but why not tilting (6) to make it less-slanted? The jump here is not easy. - Again, disagree. Why? Why isn't easy? You just have to hold you dash, both objects are literally stuck onto both extremes of the map, first your dash to the left, then (while holding Shift), you dash to the right. Why is it hard?
6. 00:51:358 (1,2,3,4,5) - Too spammy with hyperdash, that should be changed in my opinion. - This whole section is mapped accordingly to being dash-y. If you remove it, there won't be any difference between Platter - Rain, according on how Platter was built up.
7. 00:56:324 (3,4) - Same as 00:50:531 (5,6) - Still, it doesn't make any sense.
8. 00:57:979 (1,2,3) - Remove the hyperdash between (1,2), that's not necessary at all, since (2) is not a strong beat to be emphasized by hyperdash. - You have to improve that modding, buddy! You skipped a lot of things here. I will agree with this point, but you have to explain yourself better if you really want people to change what you say. The fact that you are creating a 1-1-1-1 pattern, Raiky is really good, however (2) doesn't requite any kind of HDash at all, there's a really tiny and unnoticeable beat in the music, so even if you emphasise it a bit, it wouldn't make any sense because you are making this pattern quite inconsistent, so isn't good in terms of playability.
9. 01:16:600 (3,4) - I find the hyperdash missing here. Funny you didn't point out 01:23:221 (3,4) - ! Seems he doesn't want to create an HDash with those beats, you don't understand what he is trying to do
10. 01:27:703 (8,9) - Could be difficult to catch as the distances of 01:27:152 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) are quite similar but (8,9) here lacks hyperdash. - To sum it up, you forgot to HDash here. Or you could even reduce the distances even more, since the music is losing its "power", so isn't even worth emphasising that much, it wouldn't any sense to add another HDash to this part when you are supposed to make it less dense.

alienflybot wrote:

[ General]

• 
  Tags

1. Add 'Kosuke Oshima' , 'Momoi Haruko' , 'East' *Link for Proof

tags... errr sure XD
added to all diff

[ Cup]

• 
  Gameplay

1. 00:14:531 (7,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - Avoid using such pattern in Cup. Cup beginners will be scared of these difficult patterns.
   1) i had 1 of my fren that never play ctb to test this... and its not hard as normal cup pattern,
   2) i try to play it with my left hand(usually i play with right hand) so its like im a newbie to this ctb game but its still easy to catch
   
   but hey... i will just "reduce" their distance of each triplet ^^
   so its solved, its the same pattern but more easier than before... /b]
   
2. 01:20:738 (1) - End the spinner earlier, maybe at 01:23:221 so players can prepare here without making hasty decisions.
   as for this, it will just feels weird to end it earlier, and 1/1 break is more than enough imo

[ Salad]

• 
  [b]Gameplay

1. 00:01:290 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - Remove these big jumps, as they are not really necessary here.
   1) its on the opening, even if newbie miss this, they will retry and absolutely know to catch it next time.
   2) its not that hard , really,... T^T
   
   but still... rather than just arguing, i will just closen their gap so the dash require is a "bit" lower...
   
2. 00:35:014 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Don't add small dashes between (1,2)s. It can be repetitive and also difficult for Salad beginners.
3. 00:41:635 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - ^
   1) yes, this can be catch without dash at all...
   2) i intentionally give a distance because if new player KNOW that they cant catch it without dash, they will absolutely dash to catch it
   
   ofc they wont miss it, its so easy and i give quite lots of break around this section.
   
4. 01:08:738 (1,2,3,1,2,1) - Avoid straight-standing notes, they cause static movements and pretty hard to dash after catching them. What I mean static movements are something like 01:09:152 (2,3)
   
   err... i know its static, because for me its the same sound so normally in Std, you stack it, in osu!mania & Taiko, you jackhammer it, thus i just make it static at ctb... and another thing is i cant think of a fitting jump there. so no change yet here...
   
5. 01:13:290 (3,4) - Move (4) right a grid. The jump is too high in my opinion.
   01:12:462 (1,2) - this is not a problem, so... 01:13:290 (3,4) - this is just basically the same at how to catch the previous one XD
   no change, sry
   

[ Platter]

• 
  Gameplay

1. 00:07:083 (4,5) - Move (5) away from the edge and make (5) less-slanted, because the hyperdash is quite vigorous.
2. 00:07:290 (5,6,7,8,1) - Movement here is quite strange, because the distance of (5,6) and (8,1) create some gaps. Better make it easy here, like you make the distances even, or just make it easier.
   Thanks for your concern, but its already optimized for easier catch, but hmm...
   
   let me change it into something more easier... so its ok...
   i changed it into a pattern where you HDash to the corner then just simply walk to the left
   
   
3. 00:21:979 (2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - The distances of most of the notes can be shortened, it is so dash-demanding otherwise.
   sure thing
   
4. 00:46:807 (1,2,3,4,5) - Could be difficult to catch (3) and (5) especially. Shorten the distances please.
   Ok, make them less jump
   
5. 00:47:634 (1,2) - Lower the distance here, it is so big!
6. 00:48:462 (1,2) - Uhuh ^
   errr, nope, this is 100% intentional and i need player to dash to catch this,
   if player catch this with dash, they will DIRECTLY goes into hyperdash to catch another fruit..
   
   its my perfect pattern and perfect way to make a good spread ^^
   
   
7. 00:50:531 (5) - I find this doubtful because players may have to dash in order to catch the tail of (5). I recommend making it easier by omitting the small dash between the slider.
8. 01:03:773 (5) - ^
   same reason as above, i need player to dash,
   they can dash and continue HDash to next fruit, thats what i aim... ^^

[ Rain]

• 
  Gameplay

1. 00:07:290 (5,6,7,8,1) - Ouch this hurts. The hyperdash allocation here is not even, and I don't suggest having a bunch of hyperdash here. It is much better to remove the hyperdash at (5,6,7) and keep the hyperdash at (8,1).
   First) its not even!! yes, but how to catch it?? just dash all the way, no need a specific timing.... full simple dash
   
   Long ago, i make a full "Hyperwalk" pattern here, so that it can be CATCHed without even dashing, just walk but its HD fruit...
   then to make things easier, i make it a simple dash but some people still comment on it, i just dont get it anymore!
   
   second) if i follow your pattern, isnt it looks very very similar on how to catch it like on platter?
   furthermore, you tried your own pattern right? SOME QAT will say... "this HD is too powerful(the effect, the distance and stuff)"
   
   so.. I JUST simply make it a simple dash... nothing that beat this simpleness... but why argument keep on coming .... T^T
   well... anyway i edit some of it, so now its only 2 HD on this pattern... all with simple dash to catch.
   
   
2. 00:09:979 (4,5) - Lower the distance here.
3. 00:13:290 (4,5) - ^
4. 00:18:255 (2,3) - ^
   Sure things~
   
   
5. 00:41:014 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - Kinda hyperdash spam here, yet I don't find these hyperdash works here, instead it feels like an over usage of hyperdash. Please refine the pattern and remove the hyperdashes, you can add hyperdash every 4 circles to make it fresh.
   Thx for your concern, but ive work for this pattern a looots of times, by changing it over and over...
   but i came into a conclusion that i really love this one...
   
   its consistent, and HD on specific beat and calculated distance... hope u dont mind ^^
   
6. 00:44:738 (4,5) - It is easy to miss the middle droplet of (4) as this part requires entire dashing. Please tilt (4) a bit to cope with that.
7. 00:45:979 (3,4) - ^
   
   actually, i can tilt this a bit and reduce the slider length ^^
   but dont expect too much tilt because it wont be HD anymore if i tilt it too much and no HD fruit is nearly impossible to catch the next fruit
   
   
   
8. 00:50:531 (5,6) - I know what you are trying to do here, but why not tilting (6) to make it less-slanted? The jump here is not easy.
9. 00:56:324 (3,4) - Same as 00:50:531 (5,6)
   Sure, but again dont expect too much tilt XD
   
   
10. 00:51:358 (1,2,3,4,5) - Too spammy with hyperdash, that should be changed in my opinion.
    and sry i cant change the section here, reducing it will make this rain's chorus too easy and same with platter
    
    
11. 00:57:979 (1,2,3) - Remove the hyperdash between (1,2), that's not necessary at all, since (2) is not a strong beat to be emphasized by hyperdash.
    got it, removed the HD and make it a normal jumpy pattern~
    
    
12. 01:16:600 (3,4) - I find the hyperdash missing here.
    err its not intend for HD jump, but in case.. i will reduce their distance for easier catch , tq ^^
    
    
13. 01:27:703 (8,9) - Could be difficult to catch as the distances of 01:27:152 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) are quite similar but (8,9) here lacks hyperdash.
    HD is out of option so.. i will jst reduce their distance, tq

The CtB difficulties may need some more refining and reworking to be pushed forwards, as some of the difficulties, especially Rain lacks a bit of quality. Call me later for a recheck!

Good luck!

Okoratu wrote:

Go Raika /

LordRaika wrote:

alienflybot wrote:

[ Cup]

• 
  Gameplay

1. 00:14:531 (7,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - Avoid using such pattern in Cup. Cup beginners will be scared of these difficult patterns.
   1) i had 1 of my fren that never play ctb to test this... and its not hard as normal cup pattern,
   2) i try to play it with my left hand(usually i play with right hand) so its like im a newbie to this ctb game but its still easy to catch

Okoratu wrote:

am i the guy who tested that lols

Okoratu wrote:

am i the guy who tested that lols

Kurokami wrote:

[Cup]

00:07:290 (5) - There is no feedback for the sliderend which shouldn't happen in any CtB specific difficulty. Its allowed to have silenced end in osu! but since in CtB you need to catch it anyway, some feedback required.

Kuro...
View > Volume > Music 0% , effect 100%, it does have a sound on it on every diff.. its not silenced
its normal-hitfinish.wav

01:24:048 (1) - Oh hey I missed this one. No, the distance is truly short here if you play without knowing the map. At the same time it makes no sense that you mapped 01:14:117 (5,1,2,3,4,5,6) but used spinner at 01:20:738 (1). Why? Every song has repetitive instrument part
Haha... dude, i knew this thing 2years ago, and since i try to compose some music and using fruity "loops"
but err, ok, so i drag them a bit to left


[Salad]

00:07:290 (5,6,7,8) - Same as on Cup. This is not allowed no matter what.

00:07:290 - soft-hitnormal + drum-hitfinish
00:07:600 - soft-hitnormal + normal-hitfinish
00:07:703 (6,7,8) - LR3_FXDSRPF R & L .wav

im surprised you still want to "try" to mod my hitsound.




00:40:807 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Can you flip the jumps here? Instead of going towards to the middle they should go from there. To make some variety to your patterns here.
.... ... .. sure....

[Platter]

00:03:772 (4,5) - I get the sound what you want to follow here but thats nothing ordinary. It shouldn't be HDashes. Instead, it would be nice to have one between (5,1).
ok

00:07:290 (5,6,7,8) - Muted hitsounds again.
^

00:07:841 (8,1) - Its so weird to not have some distance here. Please try to increase it.
just a little bit, yes... SURE, but dont expect more because it will be 1/6HD and i dont want anyone to argue about this!!


00:21:152 - I wonder why this spot is empty. It basically cries for an object.
00:21:565 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Omg slider spam. Besides the fact to be really boring to see 1/2 sliders everywhere you can't make various patterns with them either for a long time. It would be nice to divide some or add some repeat following the vocal. Good, you mapped every syllable here but that just ended up to have no real meaning.
is this really quality issue?! as you can see im following vocal, and no, i dont wnt to add object there.
i added it on rain, not on any lower diff, i dont use lots of 1/2 slider on rain, i think you know why.
ANYWAY... just what did u expect from this section's pattern to grow? from cup to salad and platter.
well... worry not, i will just make the variation for you anyway, ... ... ...


01:26:531 (4,1) - What is this HDash please. It makes no sense to follow something which is that weak.
uhh... whatever, just dragged it closer to left... done


[Rain]

Ok, I actually gave up this. There are so many inconsistent jump pattern, once you followed the drum but later there is nothing at the drums.
00:08:117 (2,3) - no jump 00:14:738 (1,2) - jump
00:08:945 (6,7) - no jump 00:15:565 (5,6) - jump
and so on.
you are comparing two different section of pattern
jump or not is depend on the pattern on HOW i want a player to catch it... ugh... issue? perhaps to mapper in subjective view! not player....


00:21:152 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2) - Good, you changed the sliders to circles. Sorry if I sound a bit rude, but this is still, if not more, boring.
NO, ITS FINE...the rude doesnt matter!! its just, if this is NOT an issue, SO BE IT!!! tq ^^'
and you are saying LIKE... this is because of mod? this is what i have since i mapped this long ago....

00:27:152 (6,7) - HDash which follows nothing.
.... .... geez....
changed 00:27:358 - this into HD, now if you still say it follows nothing... i will leave ctb community at once.

00:29:841 (2,3) - HDash which is missing.
think again.... is it missing?? if i add one, WILL YOU tell me to add another one here 00:23:220 (1,2,3) -
LOOK, why i point that timeline, thats the looping point of the song, its same pitch same sound just different lyrics.


00:32:324 (3,4) - Holy cow this distance.
on the 2nd thought, this is due to circle size changed, so i will add HD between them

00:39:152 (1) - Uhm, what?
i dont even want to argue on this. its like... so pointless

00:53:841 (3,4) - Distance please.
yes thank you, this one is absolutely because of circle size.

01:14:117 (8,1) - This distance is a little bit too high after that HDash. Please shorten it a little.
Sure things~

My suggestion for this, even if you want to keep it, please go through on the whole difficulty and make the Dashes and HDashes consistent, with Platter as well.

All done~
except this > 00:34:186 - section on rain, i wont change it again and again... i have had enough of this.
[]

Closing words. I came to check this without knowing or even guessing what I might find nor I did take a look at the afb's mod. Each of them is my own personal opinion and suggestion. If you don't like something, fine. We can discuss it and might find a solution to satisfy both of us. Good luck. o/

Edit: It looks like the bubble fixed by Yuii-. Well, its up to you then whether you take these into consideration or not.
Yep, tq for the check...

LordRaika wrote:

[Rain]

you are comparing two different section of pattern
jump or not is depend on the pattern on HOW i want a player to catch it... ugh... issue? perhaps to mapper in subjective view! not player.... I'm trying to lead you here but it looks meaningless effort since you are rejecting everything what minght change your map. Why can't you use different types of jumps between similar parts? Normal jump here, HDash later, for example. This makes the map interesting and enjoyable. Don't ignore strong beats to create differences, instead try to play with jumps to make those.

By the way, I took a look at your map as a player, not a mapper.


00:21:152 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2) - Good, you changed the sliders to circles. Sorry if I sound a bit rude, but this is still, if not more, boring.
NO, ITS FINE...the rude doesnt matter!! its just, if this is NOT an issue, SO BE IT!!! tq ^^'
and you are saying LIKE... this is because of mod? this is what i have since i mapped this long ago....

00:29:841 (2,3) - HDash which is missing.
think again.... is it missing?? if i add one, WILL YOU tell me to add another one here 00:23:220 (1,2,3) -
LOOK, why i point that timeline, thats the looping point of the song, its same pitch same sound just different lyrics. Did I told you to add one there?! Please. There is already a small jump. /o/

All done~
except this > 00:34:186 - section on rain, i wont change it again and again... i have had enough of this. Well, I already mentioned this to you earlier yet its still the same. /o/
[]


i feel like... the longer you guys are trying to mod this beatmap, the more less important things it is... wtf
anyway thx for the check, i hope i can get this done soon!


Thank you everyone~

alienflybot wrote:

[ Rain]

1. 01:17:427 - 01:26:324 - This part do not have any hyperdashes, which is quite simple as a Rain in my opinion. I suggest the following parts to add hyperdash:
   • 01:20:324 (5) - What about adding a hyperdash here, because this note is quite strong in the rhythm. I recommend Ctrl+H'ing (5) so there is a hyperdash between (4,5) from left to right.
   
   Sure, added the HD
   
   • 01:23:221 (3,4) - You may either add a hyperdash here, or 01:23:634 (4,5) - Since (4) is at the same part of rhythm as above which is 01:20:324 (5) so a hyperdash here would do. Or else, 01:23:634 (4,5) is also applicable with the hyperdash since (5) is the beginning of another stanza.
   
   i add two here, for agreeing two things you concern...
   
   • 01:25:496 (4,1) - It is optional here, you may add a hyperdash here if you like. As I heard there are some louder sound at (1), adding the hyperdash can also emphasize the new combo start.
   uhm thx but i think i cant made any change for this part XD

Not really much to point out now. For the hitsounding, I am not sure if you really want to change them or not, probably still need some discussions on that? After the conclusions are made, I can help bubbling it or giving a heart.

Nope, i changed it, so its perfectly done...

Good luck!

1. 00:14:531 (7,1) - NC inconsistency
2. 00:17:841 (1,2,3,4,5) - This combo should be divided into two on (3) for consistency
3. 00:28:186 (1,2,3) - Why is this mapped with 1/2 sliders when the rhythm is exactly the same as 00:29:427 (1,2,3) which is mapped with 1/1 circles (repeats in the following combos as well)
4. 00:37:496 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - Far too much reliance on 1/2 patterns for a Cup diff in my opinion, a simpler rhythm would be more appropriate for the difficulty at this bpm
5. 00:50:945 (5,1) - 00:54:255 (4,1) - etc. - More NC inconsistencies
6. 01:10:807 (1,1) - Insufficient reaction time between note-spinner, especially considering the short length
7. 01:14:531 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - These combos are pretty long for a Cup diff imo, dividing into 2 would be more comfortable

1. 00:02:945 (1) - This is the only note that requires dash until 00:35:221 and a lot of the notes that you are trying to emphasise with dash such as 00:11:221 (1) - 00:15:048 - etc. are edge-case dash scenarios where the player is uncertain whether dash is required or not. This makes them confusing to read and uncomfortable to play, so slightly more spacing on the "dash" notes would be very welcome
2. 00:07:703 (6,7,8) - These feel unnecessary in this diff, it leaves no spread in note density to the higher diffs and a huge gap up from the Cup
3. 00:21:565 (1,2,1,2) - This flow just feels really repetitive and unfitting, a smoother flow without the zig-zags would be more appropriate here
4. 01:00:048 (3,4,1,2) - The amount of movement required here feels really excessive compared to your other patterns and could catch newer players by surprise
5. 01:06:876 (2,3) - 01:09:152 (2,3,1,2) - Underemphasis of prominent notes by giving them zero movement just feels boring to play and doesn't do the song justice
6. 01:27:152 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - Same as 00:07:703 (6,7,8) - mapping all of these feels unnecessary in this diff, regardless of the spacing

1. 00:04:600 (1) - Hdash feels unnecessary here since the music is so quiet, a regular dash would be enough
2. 00:16:600 (3) - Why is there no hdash here when there's one for an identical sound in an identical rhythm at 00:10:393 (4) - ?
3. 00:21:152 - Why is this beat unmapped?
4. 00:26:117 (1) - 00:32:738 (1) - These sliders just feel lazy, more movement would be more appropriate for the difficulty
5. 00:33:979 (2,3) - I'd swap the order of these, ending a slider on the strong beat feels really weird and a NC here would be more than welcome

1. 00:07:290 (5,6,7,8,1,2) - This feels really stuttered and awkward to play. Making 00:07:703 (6,7,8) curve to the right and Ctrl+H 00:07:910 (1,2) would play much better imo
2. 00:19:496 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - This is plainly overmapped, there are no 1/4 beats here at all
3. 00:44:738 (4,3) - These sliders are pretty uncomfortable to play, the SV doesn't need to be this high
4. 01:10:186 (4) - I'd angle this slider more vertically, or reduce the hdash strength, since it's really easy to overshoot and droplet miss here

BoberOfDarkness wrote:

wtf who change this awesome pattern to this shit 00:07:290 (5,6,7,8,1) -

Feerum wrote:

Grats Raika :3

Really fun Beatmap. Nice Hitsounds. Everything Nice. <3

LordRaika wrote:

@JBHyperion...

hmm about the NC, ( i dont even have to look at it , i already knew what you want to say )
even if i have to repeat myself from 10 months ago till now, i will gladly do it.... :

"What is a NC? and a new combo on CTB works SLIGHTLY different from all mode, when you catch fruit (1) , it will have the effect to BURST out all the rest of the catched fruit of previous combo, THIS, is what i aim to greatly emphasize the cymbal... you should LOOK on the gameplay on how things goes, NOT only too focused on editor." i cant see this is so wrong , and according to what i aim on most NC, i believe its already consistent enough that i break the fruit on mostly cymbal/crush sound.
I agree with this idea, and I like it, but it's done inconsistently, which was my point. Sometimes you NC'ed on the downbeat, sometimes on the beat after it. Please don't assume that I only looked at this in the editor and didn't play the map. I put every effort possible into each and every one of my mods, and it hurts me to think that you feel otherwise.

and nope! i must say i test everything and make it as good as possible, u cant just say its unpolished.
surely nothing you say is unrankable... and for rain, IT DOES have 1/4hi-hat sound, or even, you can use 1/8 for the noise sound.... (1/8 repeating slider, i jst dont wnt to do this), sry... i just cant see any problem, everything you said... might be a hasty judgement, because most of it is intentional by myself.
Of course I can say that I feel it's unpolished, as it's my personal opinion. The whole point of modding is for people to share their opinions - you can't just flat out call someone's opinion wrong. If you re-read my post, I never said that anything was unrankable, just that I felt it could be improved before being ranked. But hey it's qualified now so the QATs will handle it from here.

Thank you JBHyperion , for the check ^^