Rechecked and it's ready now.
Bubbled #2~
Bubbled #2~
Both are fine.DakeDekaane wrote:
Shouldn't artist be "Utagumi Setsugetsuka"?
We've said this, but VGMdb is NOT official. In short, links Senritsu posted can't be an official source.Senritsu wrote:
Both are fine.DakeDekaane wrote:
Shouldn't artist be "Utagumi Setsugetsuka"?
Proof -> https://osu.ppy.sh/s/131882, https://osu.ppy.sh/s/122674
Oficial -> http://vgmdb.net/album/41281
Look at the Notes, it says 'Utagumi Setsugetsuka is Yaya (CV: Hitomi Harada), Irori (CV: Ai Kayano), Komurasaki (CV: Yui Ogura)'
I think both are fine, as long as cdh add the performers name's (which is not yet to be done)
But it's up to you BAT guys, you guys know it better.
Edit
p/3341484KSHR wrote:
About metadata stuff.
Web sites such as download services, wikipedia CAN'T be a source because they are NOT official. If you are unsure if a web site you found is official, ask native Japanese people first before mentioning in your mod post.
Also some suggestions from myself:MMzz wrote:
02:39:348 (70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77) - These doesn't fit the music at all. The wubs are going 1/3 not 1/6.
02:42:658 (90,91,92,93,94,95) - 1/6 swing rhythm doesn't even match the music and is almost impossible to read at the slow SV. There should be another 1/3 stream here similar to 02:40:796 (80,81,82,83,84,85,86) - .
02:44:245 (99,100) - ^ seriously.
02:45:969 (111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118) - Need to be removed again.
02:50:728 (141,142,143,144,145,146,147) - This can be 1/4 instead of 1/6 since 1/6 doesn't work at all still.
If he forms this section more like he did with this pattern: 02:47:417 (121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131) - It would be better and more fun to play.
Unrelated to the slow section: 03:35:348 (227) - Remove this because it isn't in the music. Unnecessary difficulty.
03:38:658 (245) - ^
03:41:969 (1) - ^
03:48:589 (38) - ^
03:51:555 (58,59,60,61,62,63,64) - Bad overmap. Make it more appropriate to the song -> http://puu.sh/bCBAL/2c81b7bc27.png
03:55:210 (82) - Remove again.
03:58:521 (106) - ^
Wow...when I take a look at it quite a lot of stuff was rejected, sorry ;w; I hope you'd agree with my explanations :3DakeDekaane wrote:
ヽ(´□`。)ノ
Bubble must be popped because offset is too early, use 8521. done
Discussed a bit with other people and this is what they said.Also some suggestions from myself:MMzz wrote:
02:39:348 (70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77) - These doesn't fit the music at all. The wubs are going 1/3 not 1/6. I was trying to follow the rapid "wubb" sound from the beginning of the kiai, but yeah the 1/3 ones feel more noticeable to be mapped. Changed!
02:42:658 (90,91,92,93,94,95) - 1/6 swing rhythm doesn't even match the music and is almost impossible to read at the slow SV. There should be another 1/3 stream here similar to 02:40:796 (80,81,82,83,84,85,86) - .yep done
02:44:245 (99,100) - ^ seriously. Can't agree with this ;w; With the slowdown this looks like a little 1/8 inside of a normal 1/4 pattern, I don't see how it's exceptionally hard to read (especially with all the omfgmuchcombobreaking 1/6+1/4 maps ranked lately)
02:45:969 (111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118) - Need to be removed again.
02:50:728 (141,142,143,144,145,146,147) - This can be 1/4 instead of 1/6 since 1/6 doesn't work at all still.
If he forms this section more like he did with this pattern: 02:47:417 (121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131) - It would be better and more fun to play. .-.
Unrelated to the slow section: 03:35:348 (227) - Remove this because it isn't in the music. Unnecessary difficulty. changed this and the three ^s below
03:38:658 (245) - ^
03:41:969 (1) - ^
03:48:589 (38) - ^
03:51:555 (58,59,60,61,62,63,64) - Bad overmap. Make it more appropriate to the song -> http://puu.sh/bCBAL/2c81b7bc27.png eh used 5plet kats instead to emphasize the "meow" hope you don't hate on it :<
03:55:210 (82) - Remove again. done this and below
03:58:521 (106) - ^
00:13:054 (27) - Shouldn't this be a kat? meh i following the floating-like sound that goes up
00:29:709 (132,134) - Remove these ones so you both reduce the stream a bit and follow vocals better. why the hell did i map these ;w; Thanks for spotting this orz Changed!
00:41:813 (43,44,45,46,47) - I think this should be kkddk to keep your kat structure here. but the current pattern (ddkkd) emphasizes the high pitched 8bit sound better >_>who cares about structure ahahaha
00:48:330 - 00:48:537 - I think dons would fit nicely with the stream in the music. added one
00:55:675 - I found this a bit weird as you ignore this strong beat, how about change 00:55:675 (58,59,60,61,62,63) - from dd dk k d to d dd kk d
did your rhythm but changed to dk kd since dd kk plays really, really weird to me orz
01:06:847 (16) - I think a kat would complement the previous kkd better
01:10:571 (43) - Considering you're following the high pitched instrument it'd be better to move this 1/4 beat back to keep following it. it plays kinda bad since it will be a "2plet-6plet" which isn't that feasible orz
01:30:330 (129,130) - This is really awkward as vocals are the same and you made this pattern different, make dk pls. peaches...i mean pitches though
01:36:950 (167,168) - ^ ^
02:44:089 (98,99,100,101,102,103,104) - This would fit better as a 1/3 stream, it won't be that unreadable and still fitting the song. zz see my reply at mitten's point, providing a little reading challenge wouldn't hurt @@
02:48:434 (128,129,130,131) - A ddd k would fit better both vocals and the instrumental than a dd dk. yep this part feels strange to me before as well. Changed!
03:00:123 - I think you should add a note here to make it consistent with previous ddddk pattern, obviously, remove the finisher if you do. I want to keep the finisher for the "ding" sound though ;w;
03:01:468 (56,57,58,59) - Kinda the same here, a dk dk pattern would be better here for vocals. ^
03:12:847 - Missing note? i'm a baka
03:13:365 (110) - Remove? There that noise though ;w;
03:15:020 (116) - ^While the music does have nothing to support a note here, not mapping it simply feels too empty since I've been keeping the 3/4 rhythm from 03:12:245
03:16:365 (121) - A don would fit better here and also would make more sense with the "extra" sound in the music. but the kats here are already used to emphasize the higher sound ;w;
03:16:985 (124) - A don would be better to separate both sections in the music better. done!
04:29:088 (16,17) - Change to dk as I explained before But I didn't change it lol
04:35:708 (55,56) - ^ ^
uguu dake chan moeness too kawaii uguu
dayum son where'd you findcdhsausageboy wrote:
Well had access to my father's lappy for a day...UPDATED.
Got rid of all of the "hard to read" 1/6s, hope no one is sad about it ;w;
Come at me bats
cdhsausageboy wrote:
Come at me bats
cdhsausageboy wrote:
Come at me bats
cdhsausageboy wrote:
Deleted lines are changed uguu
Done! Thanks for the mod kawaii uguuStefan wrote:
00:36:658 - Personally I find the SV a bit too high at being natural, I suggest decreasing 1.10x, the more intensive part where you can use 1.20x would be the other Kiai parts. eh x1.1 looks too slow compared to the hype so um compromised with x1.15 instead
01:07:176 (18) - Remove? 01:07:072 (17) should stay alone to have more impact with 01:07:279 (19,20,21,22,23) then. I want to keep the 7-note patterns here because cool ;w;
01:08:831 (31) - same reason as above. ^
02:39:141 - 02:52:383 - *sigh* they are clearer to read at 0.95x SV on 02:39:141. trolling on purpose, sry :/
02:40:245 (75,76) - (75) should be moved at the following white tick while (76) should be mapped at 1/2 on the following red tick (02:40:589). I can't hear anything out here what fills 1/3 here. adjusted stuff a bit so they play the same like the "ma-wa-re" ddk later
02:46:866 (113,114) - ^ ^
03:05:624 - imo I am not sure if this should stay here since 03:05:624 (81) is slowed and part of this stream pattern. would make it better if you put the 1.00x SV at 03:05:934 (82). moved the green line to 03:05:934 while leaving the notes unchanged cos snare ;w;
03:45:348 - ;____; what is this.. as much I dislike this I won't complain much about this section. but I find 1.50x too fast, use 1.40x instead. That looks clearer. This SV is on purpose to make the 1/6s look like 1/4 which um looks really cool ;w;
Well, that's it. Mostly the SV issues should be fixed since they fix some issues and/or cause better gameplay. Poke me after you've fixed your map.
Stefan wrote:
I have asked #taiko out about their opinion about 02:39:141 and also 01:10:589 (43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50) since the overlap between (49,50) needs to be fixed as well.SPOILER11:31 Nwolf: 01:11:417 - very critical here imo
11:34 Nwolf: 03:44:934 - and then here again
11:34 Ekoro: that 1/3 part is weird
11:35 Ekoro: with the SV it can be mistaken for 1/4
11:40 Stefan: 01:11:417 - is okay, 03:44:93 - could really cause trouble
11:41 Nwolf: I think the first overlaps too much
11:41 Stefan: I don't know... I love when people use SV changes to do cool stuff
11:41 Stefan: But they should be natural
11:41 Nwolf: yeah it is cool stuff there
11:41 Nwolf: if it didn't overlap so much :<
11:42 Dainesl: wait wat
11:42 Nwolf: cdh's map Dain
11:42 Dainesl: ah
11:42 Dainesl: I can chip in if you want
11:42 Stefan: Would be great
11:43 Stefan: because I have doubts in giving the second bubble.
11:43 LunaticP: HI #taiko
11:43 Dainesl: I'll have a little testplay of it just to see what's up now
11:45 Nwolf: 01:10:176 - From here I would reduce the SV a little bit with each note
11:46 Dainesl: wait
11:47 Dainesl: 01:13:072 - what about 0.8x here
11:47 Dainesl: 01:11:417 - change to 0.9x
11:48 Dainesl: i dunno, just another way of dealing with overlap while giving the notes at the timestamp Nwolf mentioned equal emphasis
11:49 Nwolf: or that
11:49 Dainesl: well there is still SLIGHT overlap
11:50 Dainesl: but the note becomes clear in time I feel
11:51 Dainesl: what do you think stops it from the 2nd bubble @ Stefan
11:51 Stefan: 02:39:141 - & 03:45:348 -
11:51 Stefan: It personally reads badly, not hard
11:52 Stefan: hard would be someone subjective which shouldn't prevent being bubbled
11:53 Dainesl: personally I wasn't really confused by this reading
11:53 Dainesl: but I can see the potential issues
11:53 Dainesl: maybe it's that the SV is too low or something so it looks like 1/4
Let's slay it out more:
01:10:589 (43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50) - like said this should/needs to be fixed to prevent overlapping on (49,50). A line on 01:10:589 - with 0.9x SV should solve this issue and looks natural enough. made 01:11:417 - x0.9 and 01:11:831 - x0.8 instead, this should be perfectly fine since your suggestion and my solution are both "change the note after 1/2 to x0.9" (k idk how to express stuff)
01:40:693 (192,193) - Switch them? I think I can hear out what's your intention in this stream but these two should be swapped then. b....but this plays extremely well >_> i mostly get rekt by the map with dt but i can fc this part literally every time and changing it really breaks my flow ;w;
03:30:245 (196,197,198,199) - this isn't anyhow related to the song putting 1/6 here. change this to 1/4. k
We've got to do something about the SV issues here, seriously. That isn't anymore about trolling with the SV or to call this has hard to read. The main issue is it looks not good and misplaced. Please excuse me when it sounds harsh but I want to clear out why I am worried about this and don't bubbled yet. I hope you can understand my sight about this case. Dainesl posted suggestions about some parts which are pretty good and STILL keep your intention to "troll" with SV. no kd hmmmmmmmmmmm probably going to discuss further for the wubwub part, not really going to touch anything now, sorry ;w;