dayum son where'd you findcdhsausageboy wrote:
Well had access to my father's lappy for a day...UPDATED.
Got rid of all of the "hard to read" 1/6s, hope no one is sad about it ;w;
Come at me bats
dayum son where'd you findcdhsausageboy wrote:
Well had access to my father's lappy for a day...UPDATED.
Got rid of all of the "hard to read" 1/6s, hope no one is sad about it ;w;
Come at me bats
cdhsausageboy wrote:
Come at me bats
cdhsausageboy wrote:
Come at me bats
cdhsausageboy wrote:
Deleted lines are changed uguu
Done! Thanks for the mod kawaii uguuStefan wrote:
00:36:658 - Personally I find the SV a bit too high at being natural, I suggest decreasing 1.10x, the more intensive part where you can use 1.20x would be the other Kiai parts. eh x1.1 looks too slow compared to the hype so um compromised with x1.15 instead
01:07:176 (18) - Remove? 01:07:072 (17) should stay alone to have more impact with 01:07:279 (19,20,21,22,23) then. I want to keep the 7-note patterns here because cool ;w;
01:08:831 (31) - same reason as above. ^
02:39:141 - 02:52:383 - *sigh* they are clearer to read at 0.95x SV on 02:39:141. trolling on purpose, sry :/
02:40:245 (75,76) - (75) should be moved at the following white tick while (76) should be mapped at 1/2 on the following red tick (02:40:589). I can't hear anything out here what fills 1/3 here. adjusted stuff a bit so they play the same like the "ma-wa-re" ddk later
02:46:866 (113,114) - ^ ^
03:05:624 - imo I am not sure if this should stay here since 03:05:624 (81) is slowed and part of this stream pattern. would make it better if you put the 1.00x SV at 03:05:934 (82). moved the green line to 03:05:934 while leaving the notes unchanged cos snare ;w;
03:45:348 - ;____; what is this.. as much I dislike this I won't complain much about this section. but I find 1.50x too fast, use 1.40x instead. That looks clearer. This SV is on purpose to make the 1/6s look like 1/4 which um looks really cool ;w;
Well, that's it. Mostly the SV issues should be fixed since they fix some issues and/or cause better gameplay. Poke me after you've fixed your map.
Stefan wrote:
I have asked #taiko out about their opinion about 02:39:141 and also 01:10:589 (43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50) since the overlap between (49,50) needs to be fixed as well.SPOILER11:31 Nwolf: 01:11:417 - very critical here imo
11:34 Nwolf: 03:44:934 - and then here again
11:34 Ekoro: that 1/3 part is weird
11:35 Ekoro: with the SV it can be mistaken for 1/4
11:40 Stefan: 01:11:417 - is okay, 03:44:93 - could really cause trouble
11:41 Nwolf: I think the first overlaps too much
11:41 Stefan: I don't know... I love when people use SV changes to do cool stuff
11:41 Stefan: But they should be natural
11:41 Nwolf: yeah it is cool stuff there
11:41 Nwolf: if it didn't overlap so much :<
11:42 Dainesl: wait wat
11:42 Nwolf: cdh's map Dain
11:42 Dainesl: ah
11:42 Dainesl: I can chip in if you want
11:42 Stefan: Would be great
11:43 Stefan: because I have doubts in giving the second bubble.
11:43 LunaticP: HI #taiko
11:43 Dainesl: I'll have a little testplay of it just to see what's up now
11:45 Nwolf: 01:10:176 - From here I would reduce the SV a little bit with each note
11:46 Dainesl: wait
11:47 Dainesl: 01:13:072 - what about 0.8x here
11:47 Dainesl: 01:11:417 - change to 0.9x
11:48 Dainesl: i dunno, just another way of dealing with overlap while giving the notes at the timestamp Nwolf mentioned equal emphasis
11:49 Nwolf: or that
11:49 Dainesl: well there is still SLIGHT overlap
11:50 Dainesl: but the note becomes clear in time I feel
11:51 Dainesl: what do you think stops it from the 2nd bubble @ Stefan
11:51 Stefan: 02:39:141 - & 03:45:348 -
11:51 Stefan: It personally reads badly, not hard
11:52 Stefan: hard would be someone subjective which shouldn't prevent being bubbled
11:53 Dainesl: personally I wasn't really confused by this reading
11:53 Dainesl: but I can see the potential issues
11:53 Dainesl: maybe it's that the SV is too low or something so it looks like 1/4
Let's slay it out more:
01:10:589 (43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50) - like said this should/needs to be fixed to prevent overlapping on (49,50). A line on 01:10:589 - with 0.9x SV should solve this issue and looks natural enough. made 01:11:417 - x0.9 and 01:11:831 - x0.8 instead, this should be perfectly fine since your suggestion and my solution are both "change the note after 1/2 to x0.9" (k idk how to express stuff)
01:40:693 (192,193) - Switch them? I think I can hear out what's your intention in this stream but these two should be swapped then. b....but this plays extremely well >_> i mostly get rekt by the map with dt but i can fc this part literally every time and changing it really breaks my flow ;w;
03:30:245 (196,197,198,199) - this isn't anyhow related to the song putting 1/6 here. change this to 1/4. k
We've got to do something about the SV issues here, seriously. That isn't anymore about trolling with the SV or to call this has hard to read. The main issue is it looks not good and misplaced. Please excuse me when it sounds harsh but I want to clear out why I am worried about this and don't bubbled yet. I hope you can understand my sight about this case. Dainesl posted suggestions about some parts which are pretty good and STILL keep your intention to "troll" with SV. no kd hmmmmmmmmmmm probably going to discuss further for the wubwub part, not really going to touch anything now, sorry ;w;
Taiko Ranking Criteria wrote:
Shakers (Spinners)
Try to leave at least a 1/2 beat between a note and a spinner. Using them on streams may be okay. Short spinners are highly not recommended, since they cover the notes and can cause players to miss due to pressing too much.
t/259091Dainesl wrote:
on cutting edge there's a ton of unsnaps being reported for some reason
Also resnapped all notes, hopefully they're fixed now! @dainOnosakiHito wrote:
Reason for Disqualification
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Disqualified for several SV issues and more:
- 02:32:521 - Bugged barline which can be fixed by moving the inherited timeline forward. don
- 02:51:348 (140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,1,1) - This might be an subjecitce view but patterns with 1/3+1/4+SV changes+spinner are more than questionable. Everything is on a small spot which makes it really confusing. Short spinners are normaly something we should prevent. We also have it written down in the guidelines: Deleted the note after the spinner to give players ample space to read the next notes
- 03:31:899 (210,211) - This should be made smoother. In the additional modding I have some examples.
- 03:38:314 (240,241,242,243,244) - Transition isn't here smooth either.
- 03:43:278 (5,6) - What happened here? Transition is really bad. Timeline is probably -1ms too late. Regarding the mods for this part: made the sv changes smoother for this part in general (i think) while still having the same idea
- 04:08:521 - Bugged barline which can be fixed by moving the inherited timeline forward. don
- 04:56:521 - ^ did what tks suggested instead
Additional Modding
Small modding. Didn't mentioned everything since I don't have much time.
- 00:48:658 (1,2,3,4) - No 1/6, but should be fine I guess. Just wanted to mention it. yup its fine and cool
- 00:49:693 (10) - Can be deleted. The transition doesn't look that nice from one to the other stanza because of the SV change. In case you are thinking about adding another SV change here for compensaiting this, I say, I wouldn't suggest you to do that. There is no real sound for this note anyway, and in this way both parts are seperated to each other in a better way (people can prepare for the 1/6 in a better way). eh but ;w; The pace in this kiai is pretty fast compared to the intro and the part after it so having a break won't fit really well >_> Not changing this for now since its not really game-breaking, but eh I might still change my mind later
- 00:49:900 - These kind of patterns are something I wouldn't support that much. But well, since it is monotonically it might be fine. You can reconsider it once again. um no
- 01:11:417 - Transition here isn't that nice either. Little overlapping. Can be kept as x1.00 and at 01:11:831 have x0.90(while
- 01:12:245 is x0.80). Would fit to the stanza as well. Made 01:11:417 x0.95 to give players a hint to the slowdown part better, fixed everything else accordingly!
- 01:27:348 - Just keep it x1.20 if you ask me. Having such short SV changes with patterns is rather questionable to me. a few people mentioned it already so yeah, changed
- 04:01:486 - Similar to previous mentioned case. Having now a deceleration doesn't seem to fit here. Even though I might understand the intention behind it, due to deeper voice. But better keep the SV the same or something like that. but it looks really cool D:
Thanks for the mod baka ;w;Nwolf wrote:
woof woof BAKA woof baka indeed
[Bakadiff]
00:49:693 - Add another green bar with SV 1.07 for ~da smooth transition~ did x1.075 magic here k
05:03:555 - Add red timing section since the first beat shifted don
00:31:486 (146) - Change to kat to give ~~da bass dons~~ more emphasis k
01:49:900 (246) - 03:01:072 (53) - 04:48:658 (134) - idk I would've preferred kats on all these notes since you kinda have ~~~da snare rhythm~~~ here this is following ~~~da vocal pitches~~~ though
02:52:383 - Replace with another note and add 02:52:796 - something big here (preferably a big kat) i wanted to but a note there just doesn't feel as good somehow ;w;