forum

Utagumi Setsugetsuka - Maware! Setsugetsuka chiptune Remix [

posted
Total Posts
123
show more
Stefan
00:26:210 (110,111) - Personally that sounds and plays unconfortable, change it into http://puu.sh/c5BvW/981481732a.jpg
00:36:658 - Personally I find the SV a bit too high at being natural, I suggest decreasing 1.10x, the more intensive part where you can use 1.20x would be the other Kiai parts.
01:05:727 (7,8,9,10) - Ctrl+G; the lighter sounds better at (8,10).
01:07:176 (18) - Remove? 01:07:072 (17) should stay alone to have more impact with 01:07:279 (19,20,21,22,23) then.
01:08:831 (31) - same reason as above.
01:27:348 (109,110,111,112,113) - Change this to dkdkk, listen carefully to the music and which beats are lighter and darker.#
02:39:141 - 02:52:383 - *sigh* they are clearer to read at 0.95x SV on 02:39:141.
02:39:279 - That break feels so weird and unfitting, I automatically tap to this time when I play lol
02:40:245 (75,76) - (75) should be moved at the following white tick while (76) should be mapped at 1/2 on the following red tick (02:40:589). I can't hear anything out here what fills 1/3 here.
02:46:866 (113,114) - ^
03:05:624 - imo I am not sure if this should stay here since 03:05:624 (81) is slowed and part of this stream pattern. would make it better if you put the 1.00x SV at 03:05:934 (82).
03:45:348 - ;____; what is this.. as much I dislike this I won't complain much about this section. but I find 1.50x too fast, use 1.40x instead. That looks clearer.


Well, that's it. Mostly the SV issues should be fixed since they fix some issues and/or cause better gameplay. Poke me after you've fixed your map.
Topic Starter
Asagi Mutsuki

cdhsausageboy wrote:

Deleted lines are changed uguu

Stefan wrote:

00:36:658 - Personally I find the SV a bit too high at being natural, I suggest decreasing 1.10x, the more intensive part where you can use 1.20x would be the other Kiai parts. eh x1.1 looks too slow compared to the hype so um compromised with x1.15 instead
01:07:176 (18) - Remove? 01:07:072 (17) should stay alone to have more impact with 01:07:279 (19,20,21,22,23) then. I want to keep the 7-note patterns here because cool ;w;
01:08:831 (31) - same reason as above. ^
02:39:141 - 02:52:383 - *sigh* they are clearer to read at 0.95x SV on 02:39:141. trolling on purpose, sry :/
02:40:245 (75,76) - (75) should be moved at the following white tick while (76) should be mapped at 1/2 on the following red tick (02:40:589). I can't hear anything out here what fills 1/3 here. adjusted stuff a bit so they play the same like the "ma-wa-re" ddk later
02:46:866 (113,114) - ^ ^
03:05:624 - imo I am not sure if this should stay here since 03:05:624 (81) is slowed and part of this stream pattern. would make it better if you put the 1.00x SV at 03:05:934 (82). moved the green line to 03:05:934 while leaving the notes unchanged cos snare ;w;
03:45:348 - ;____; what is this.. as much I dislike this I won't complain much about this section. but I find 1.50x too fast, use 1.40x instead. That looks clearer. This SV is on purpose to make the 1/6s look like 1/4 which um looks really cool ;w;


Well, that's it. Mostly the SV issues should be fixed since they fix some issues and/or cause better gameplay. Poke me after you've fixed your map.
Done! Thanks for the mod kawaii uguu
*me pokes stefan*
Dainesl
Regarding 02:39:141 - and onwards in addition to 03:44:934 - these SV changes are a bit radical imo and could be kind of unreadable for some people (not to me but just giving you a heads-up)

I got an idea regarding both of them too

For Point 1
  1. 02:35:831 - Remove this inherited point and replace with the 0.9x inherited point from 1 measure before
  2. 02:38:314 - and 02:39:141 - +0.05x
Two ideas for Point 2

Idea 1
  1. 03:32:521 - and 03:32:796 - remove the 0.75x and optionally the 0.8x.
  2. Assuming you deleted only 0.75x, go from 0.84x on 03:44:934 - and increase by 0.04x per point
  3. Assuming you deleted both, go from 0.92x on 03:44:934 - and increase by 0.02x per point
Idea 2
  1. Keep current inherited points but add one of 0.8x at 03:38:727 - and one of 0.9x at 03:43:693 - (or on the note before this whatever)
  2. Then you can make the next inherited point 0.92x and go from there to 1x as second point of idea 1 is described.
just to give it some readability :oops:
Stefan
I have asked #taiko out about their opinion about 02:39:141 and also 01:10:589 (43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50) since the overlap between (49,50) needs to be fixed as well.

SPOILER
11:31 Nwolf: 01:11:417 - very critical here imo
11:34 Nwolf: 03:44:934 - and then here again
11:34 Ekoro: that 1/3 part is weird
11:35 Ekoro: with the SV it can be mistaken for 1/4
11:40 Stefan: 01:11:417 - is okay, 03:44:93 - could really cause trouble
11:41 Nwolf: I think the first overlaps too much
11:41 Stefan: I don't know... I love when people use SV changes to do cool stuff
11:41 Stefan: But they should be natural
11:41 Nwolf: yeah it is cool stuff there
11:41 Nwolf: if it didn't overlap so much :<
11:42 Dainesl: wait wat
11:42 Nwolf: cdh's map Dain
11:42 Dainesl: ah
11:42 Dainesl: I can chip in if you want
11:42 Stefan: Would be great
11:43 Stefan: because I have doubts in giving the second bubble.
11:43 LunaticP: HI #taiko
11:43 Dainesl: I'll have a little testplay of it just to see what's up now
11:45 Nwolf: 01:10:176 - From here I would reduce the SV a little bit with each note
11:46 Dainesl: wait
11:47 Dainesl: 01:13:072 - what about 0.8x here
11:47 Dainesl: 01:11:417 - change to 0.9x
11:48 Dainesl: i dunno, just another way of dealing with overlap while giving the notes at the timestamp Nwolf mentioned equal emphasis
11:49 Nwolf: or that
11:49 Dainesl: well there is still SLIGHT overlap
11:50 Dainesl: but the note becomes clear in time I feel
11:51 Dainesl: what do you think stops it from the 2nd bubble @ Stefan
11:51 Stefan: 02:39:141 - & 03:45:348 -
11:51 Stefan: It personally reads badly, not hard
11:52 Stefan: hard would be someone subjective which shouldn't prevent being bubbled
11:53 Dainesl: personally I wasn't really confused by this reading
11:53 Dainesl: but I can see the potential issues
11:53 Dainesl: maybe it's that the SV is too low or something so it looks like 1/4

Let's slay it out more:
01:10:589 (43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50) - like said this should/needs to be fixed to prevent overlapping on (49,50). A line on 01:10:589 - with 0.9x SV should solve this issue and looks natural enough.
01:40:693 (192,193) - Switch them? I think I can hear out what's your intention in this stream but these two should be swapped then.
03:30:245 (196,197,198,199) - this isn't anyhow related to the song putting 1/6 here. change this to 1/4.

We've got to do something about the SV issues here, seriously. That isn't anymore about trolling with the SV or to call this has hard to read. The main issue is it looks not good and misplaced. Please excuse me when it sounds harsh but I want to clear out why I am worried about this and don't bubbled yet. I hope you can understand my sight about this case. Dainesl posted suggestions about some parts which are pretty good and STILL keep your intention to "troll" with SV. no kd
Topic Starter
Asagi Mutsuki
IM NOT GONNA GIVE YOU GUYS KUDOSU MUAHAHA IM SO EVIL

PS before anything I'm gonna clarify that the wubwub part has x0.75 SO it the 1/3 looks like 1/4 ON PURPOSE :/ (1/3 notes with x0.75 looks EXACTLY like 1/4)

@dain well basically didn't touch anything in point 1 since basically everything there is mapped to the vocals and um imo the wubwub spacing like 1/4 is much, much easier to read than "a-little-wider-than-1/4-but-idk-how-much" spacing

Applied Idea 2 for Point 2 completely, thanks for the huge help which really eases the currently too rushed sv change >< Thanks!

Stefan wrote:

I have asked #taiko out about their opinion about 02:39:141 and also 01:10:589 (43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50) since the overlap between (49,50) needs to be fixed as well.

SPOILER
11:31 Nwolf: 01:11:417 - very critical here imo
11:34 Nwolf: 03:44:934 - and then here again
11:34 Ekoro: that 1/3 part is weird
11:35 Ekoro: with the SV it can be mistaken for 1/4
11:40 Stefan: 01:11:417 - is okay, 03:44:93 - could really cause trouble
11:41 Nwolf: I think the first overlaps too much
11:41 Stefan: I don't know... I love when people use SV changes to do cool stuff
11:41 Stefan: But they should be natural
11:41 Nwolf: yeah it is cool stuff there
11:41 Nwolf: if it didn't overlap so much :<
11:42 Dainesl: wait wat
11:42 Nwolf: cdh's map Dain
11:42 Dainesl: ah
11:42 Dainesl: I can chip in if you want
11:42 Stefan: Would be great
11:43 Stefan: because I have doubts in giving the second bubble.
11:43 LunaticP: HI #taiko
11:43 Dainesl: I'll have a little testplay of it just to see what's up now
11:45 Nwolf: 01:10:176 - From here I would reduce the SV a little bit with each note
11:46 Dainesl: wait
11:47 Dainesl: 01:13:072 - what about 0.8x here
11:47 Dainesl: 01:11:417 - change to 0.9x
11:48 Dainesl: i dunno, just another way of dealing with overlap while giving the notes at the timestamp Nwolf mentioned equal emphasis
11:49 Nwolf: or that
11:49 Dainesl: well there is still SLIGHT overlap
11:50 Dainesl: but the note becomes clear in time I feel
11:51 Dainesl: what do you think stops it from the 2nd bubble @ Stefan
11:51 Stefan: 02:39:141 - & 03:45:348 -
11:51 Stefan: It personally reads badly, not hard
11:52 Stefan: hard would be someone subjective which shouldn't prevent being bubbled
11:53 Dainesl: personally I wasn't really confused by this reading
11:53 Dainesl: but I can see the potential issues
11:53 Dainesl: maybe it's that the SV is too low or something so it looks like 1/4

Let's slay it out more:
01:10:589 (43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50) - like said this should/needs to be fixed to prevent overlapping on (49,50). A line on 01:10:589 - with 0.9x SV should solve this issue and looks natural enough. made 01:11:417 - x0.9 and 01:11:831 - x0.8 instead, this should be perfectly fine since your suggestion and my solution are both "change the note after 1/2 to x0.9" (k idk how to express stuff)
01:40:693 (192,193) - Switch them? I think I can hear out what's your intention in this stream but these two should be swapped then. b....but this plays extremely well >_> i mostly get rekt by the map with dt but i can fc this part literally every time and changing it really breaks my flow ;w;
03:30:245 (196,197,198,199) - this isn't anyhow related to the song putting 1/6 here. change this to 1/4. k

We've got to do something about the SV issues here, seriously. That isn't anymore about trolling with the SV or to call this has hard to read. The main issue is it looks not good and misplaced. Please excuse me when it sounds harsh but I want to clear out why I am worried about this and don't bubbled yet. I hope you can understand my sight about this case. Dainesl posted suggestions about some parts which are pretty good and STILL keep your intention to "troll" with SV. no kd hmmmmmmmmmmm probably going to discuss further for the wubwub part, not really going to touch anything now, sorry ;w;
Stefan
We've fixed 02:50:727 - 02:52:383 to be more readable and to differ 1/4 from 1/3. At all, good improving, especially in the SV usage.

There we go with the second bubble.

Topic Starter
Asagi Mutsuki
THANKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
bSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

the hype is almost real jiehdhewiufhewiufhiuwh
Frostmourne
moved to pending
PatZar
cancer dance \w\ hypehype
Topic Starter
Asagi Mutsuki
Thanks Frostmourne ><

@Genocide lets cancer dance \o\

ALSO I JUST NEED ANOTHER BAT WHY IS THIS SO HARD ;w;
kanpakyin
Approved.

(ノ・ω・)ノ
Dainesl
Congratulations baka cdh ! ;w;
Myxo
Congratz :3
TicClick
mare×17 + maware, maware
Scorpiour
mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare mare
Mao
Gratz \o/
Nwolf
omg cdh you are so baka

SO

BAKA

GZ
Topic Starter
Asagi Mutsuki
WHAT

HAPPENED

WHEN

I

WAS

ASLEEP

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH MAREMAREMAREMAREMAREMAREMAWARE

Thanks kanpakyin :3
TKS
grats.
this is just a small thing, but not issue.


04:08:521 (139) - barline doesnt fit the note due to bug(?). in that case, you should set(or move) the barline to 04:08:417 - or so.
04:56:521 (1) - the same. you should set a new barline(x1.00sv + KIAI) to 04:56:417 -

i hope that your next map will get better :3c
Topic Starter
Asagi Mutsuki
;w;
Senritsu
bakacdh gz <3
OnosakiHito

Reason for Disqualification


  1. Disqualified for several SV issues and more:
  2. 02:32:521 - Bugged barline which can be fixed by moving the inherited timeline forward.
  3. 02:51:348 (140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,1,1) - This might be an subjecitce view but patterns with 1/3+1/4+SV changes+spinner are more than questionable. Everything is on a small spot which makes it really confusing. Short spinners are normaly something we should prevent. We also have it written down in the guidelines:

    Taiko Ranking Criteria wrote:

    Shakers (Spinners)
    Try to leave at least a 1/2 beat between a note and a spinner. Using them on streams may be okay. Short spinners are highly not recommended, since they cover the notes and can cause players to miss due to pressing too much.
  4. 03:31:899 (210,211) - This should be made smoother. In the additional modding I have some examples.
  5. 03:38:314 (240,241,242,243,244) - Transition isn't here smooth either.
  6. 03:43:278 (5,6) - What happened here? Transition is really bad. Timeline is probably -1ms too late.
  7. 04:08:521 - Bugged barline which can be fixed by moving the inherited timeline forward.
  8. 04:56:521 - ^
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional Modding



Small modding. Didn't mentioned everything since I don't have much time.

  1. 00:48:658 (1,2,3,4) - No 1/6, but should be fine I guess. Just wanted to mention it.
  2. 00:49:693 (10) - Can be deleted. The transition doesn't look that nice from one to the other stanza because of the SV change. In case you are thinking about adding another SV change here for compensaiting this, I say, I wouldn't suggest you to do that. There is no real sound for this note anyway, and in this way both parts are seperated to each other in a better way (people can prepare for the 1/6 in a better way).
  3. 00:49:900 - These kind of patterns are something I wouldn't support that much. But well, since it is monotonically it might be fine. You can reconsider it once again.
  4. 01:11:417 - Transition here isn't that nice either. Little overlapping. Can be kept as x1.00 and at 01:11:831 have x0.90(while
  5. 01:12:245 is x0.80). Would fit to the stanza as well.
  6. 01:27:348 - Just keep it x1.20 if you ask me. Having such short SV changes with patterns is rather questionable to me.
  7. 04:01:486 - Similar to previous mentioned case. Having now a deceleration doesn't seem to fit here. Even though I might understand the intention behind it, due to deeper voice. But better keep the SV the same or something like that.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

5 BATs didn't saw these issues even though they are real design and gameplay issues. Won't comment anything here anymore.
Topic Starter
Asagi Mutsuki
did not see that coming

also lol insta grave
Shohei Ohtani
ono right now

Dainesl
on cutting edge there's a ton of unsnaps being reported for some reason
Topic Starter
Asagi Mutsuki

Dainesl wrote:

on cutting edge there's a ton of unsnaps being reported for some reason
t/259091

its because now 1ms timing errors can be checked in cutting edge

will fix later along with ono's mod
Pelaaja_X
What happened to the ranked status? ._.
Topic Starter
Asagi Mutsuki
The map got disqualified
lol
PatZar
rip best maware
Topic Starter
Asagi Mutsuki
green is fixed
blue is fixed with a little twist
purple is nu

OnosakiHito wrote:

Reason for Disqualification


  1. Disqualified for several SV issues and more:
  2. 02:32:521 - Bugged barline which can be fixed by moving the inherited timeline forward. don
  3. 02:51:348 (140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,1,1) - This might be an subjecitce view but patterns with 1/3+1/4+SV changes+spinner are more than questionable. Everything is on a small spot which makes it really confusing. Short spinners are normaly something we should prevent. We also have it written down in the guidelines: Deleted the note after the spinner to give players ample space to read the next notes
  4. 03:31:899 (210,211) - This should be made smoother. In the additional modding I have some examples.
  5. 03:38:314 (240,241,242,243,244) - Transition isn't here smooth either.
  6. 03:43:278 (5,6) - What happened here? Transition is really bad. Timeline is probably -1ms too late. Regarding the mods for this part: made the sv changes smoother for this part in general (i think) while still having the same idea
  7. 04:08:521 - Bugged barline which can be fixed by moving the inherited timeline forward. don
  8. 04:56:521 - ^ did what tks suggested instead
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional Modding



Small modding. Didn't mentioned everything since I don't have much time.

  1. 00:48:658 (1,2,3,4) - No 1/6, but should be fine I guess. Just wanted to mention it. yup its fine and cool
  2. 00:49:693 (10) - Can be deleted. The transition doesn't look that nice from one to the other stanza because of the SV change. In case you are thinking about adding another SV change here for compensaiting this, I say, I wouldn't suggest you to do that. There is no real sound for this note anyway, and in this way both parts are seperated to each other in a better way (people can prepare for the 1/6 in a better way). eh but ;w; The pace in this kiai is pretty fast compared to the intro and the part after it so having a break won't fit really well >_> Not changing this for now since its not really game-breaking, but eh I might still change my mind later :P
  3. 00:49:900 - These kind of patterns are something I wouldn't support that much. But well, since it is monotonically it might be fine. You can reconsider it once again. um no
  4. 01:11:417 - Transition here isn't that nice either. Little overlapping. Can be kept as x1.00 and at 01:11:831 have x0.90(while
  5. 01:12:245 is x0.80). Would fit to the stanza as well. Made 01:11:417 x0.95 to give players a hint to the slowdown part better, fixed everything else accordingly!
  6. 01:27:348 - Just keep it x1.20 if you ask me. Having such short SV changes with patterns is rather questionable to me. a few people mentioned it already so yeah, changed
  7. 04:01:486 - Similar to previous mentioned case. Having now a deceleration doesn't seem to fit here. Even though I might understand the intention behind it, due to deeper voice. But better keep the SV the same or something like that. but it looks really cool D:
Also resnapped all notes, hopefully they're fixed now! @dain

Thanks a bunch Ono!

now i have to look for bats all over again ;w;
Nwolf
woof woof BAKA woof

[Bakadiff]

00:49:693 - Add another green bar with SV 1.07 for ~da smooth transition~
05:03:555 - Add red timing section since the first beat shifted

00:31:486 (146) - Change to kat to give ~~da bass dons~~ more emphasis
01:49:900 (246) - 03:01:072 (53) - 04:48:658 (134) - idk I would've preferred kats on all these notes since you kinda have ~~~da snare rhythm~~~ here
02:52:383 - Replace with another note and add 02:52:796 - something big here (preferably a big kat)
Topic Starter
Asagi Mutsuki

Nwolf wrote:

woof woof BAKA woof baka indeed

[Bakadiff]

00:49:693 - Add another green bar with SV 1.07 for ~da smooth transition~ did x1.075 magic here k
05:03:555 - Add red timing section since the first beat shifted don

00:31:486 (146) - Change to kat to give ~~da bass dons~~ more emphasis k
01:49:900 (246) - 03:01:072 (53) - 04:48:658 (134) - idk I would've preferred kats on all these notes since you kinda have ~~~da snare rhythm~~~ here this is following ~~~da vocal pitches~~~ though
02:52:383 - Replace with another note and add 02:52:796 - something big here (preferably a big kat) i wanted to but a note there just doesn't feel as good somehow ;w;
Thanks for the mod baka ;w;
Nwolf
a bit more stuff

02:52:383 (1) - srsly tho it kinda was a reason for disqualify, I don't get what's so cool about it D: If you don't like a note here, leave it unmapped and add a note 02:52:796 - here or sth but I really want to be on the safe side here
03:37:762 - to 03:38:727 - make more smooth, would prefer to have SV increase on more notes than just the 1/6 triplet. Try doing that on the 1/3 notes too
03:44:658 (14,15) - Maybe also delete these so the SV stuff is clearer
Topic Starter
Asagi Mutsuki
Fixed everything
Nwolf
All DQ issues have been fixed, with a few more SV smoothness suggestions and a fixed barline at the end of the song

This has to and it will end well

Bubble #1 !

if the next BAT could approve the metadata, would be great ty
Topic Starter
Asagi Mutsuki
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH THANKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
mingmichael
finally ming comes =w=


Red ~> unrakable issue, must be changed
Blue ~> highly suggested, consider to use it
Black ~> suggestion, just free to choose it


====================


[ Maware??]

General
☞ okay

Notes Structure
☞ will mention many some suggestions for the SVs on the Notes box

Notes
• i agree with Ono for deleting 00:49:693 - . yeah i know that you wanna to follow the drum there or maybe you wanna fill with a note than break. yupp it's nice and i agree for adding it but i deleted this one to make the players prepare for the next patterns which start with 1/6 notes on 00:49:900 - and also it has decreasing SV there. deleting this note will help all the players especially for having a preparation to face the next patterns. anyway deleting this note doesn't hurt your patterns too

• a kat on 01:49:900 - please. the vocal has increased here even it's lower than 01:50:107 -

• reverse these notes 01:58:072 (294,295) - . no idea for using oo since the snare comes out on 01:58:176 - and it would be better with a kat like 01:56:521 -

• a kat 02:44:934 - . first to avoid that dondon everywhere =w= and second it could follow like a snare sound (?) which comes out there. same like 02:43:279 - which you used kat on

• add 0.80x on 02:50:365 - and change 02:50:727 - to be 0.85x. the function is to make the SV changes softer, especially from 02:50:727 - to 02:51:348 - when the notes are already dense with 1/4. so i increased the speed on 02:50:727 - and it would have a small increasing SV to 02:51:348 - (from 0.85x to 0.90x, just 0.05 changes)

• here, a kat on 03:01:072 - . the vocal has increased a bit here. it can follow the snare sound too, but it's not really important since you don't really focus on it

• this SV changes are too sudden on 03:43:555 - . actually it's no problem, but it would be better to make it a bittttt softer. it's easy, just add 1.10x on 03:43:072 - . the previous one is 1.00x ~> 1.15x , and now it will be 1.00x ~> 1.10x ~> 1.15x

no for these SV changes 04:01:486 - ; 04:01:693 - ; 04:01:900 - . the notes are almost overlapped there. okay, it's not problem to keep that decreasing SV there, but you must do this. add 1.15x on 04:00:245 - which is fit with the stanza and change those three SV changes 04:01:486 - ; 04:01:693 - ; 04:01:900 - to be 1.10x ; 1.05x and 1.00x. you can see the result later and try to compare with yours

• aha a kat on 04:48:658 - . same reason like the previous points


====================


let me decide this after you take a look my mods
Topic Starter
Asagi Mutsuki

mingmichael wrote:

finally ming comes =w= kenapa lewat =w= *me slaps*


Red ~> unrakable issue, must be changed
Blue ~> highly suggested, consider to use it
Black ~> suggestion, just free to choose it


====================


[ Maware??]

General
☞ okay

Notes Structure
☞ will mention many some suggestions for the SVs on the Notes box

Notes
• i agree with Ono for deleting 00:49:693 - . yeah i know that you wanna to follow the drum there or maybe you wanna fill with a note than break. yupp it's nice and i agree for adding it but i deleted this one to make the players prepare for the next patterns which start with 1/6 notes on 00:49:900 - and also it has decreasing SV there. deleting this note will help all the players especially for having a preparation to face the next patterns. anyway deleting this note doesn't hurt your patterns too *sighs* fixed

• a kat on 01:49:900 - please. the vocal has increased here even it's lower than 01:50:107 - though 01:50:107 's pitch is really much higher and i simply need to take that into account so having only that as a kat will describe the overall flow better (dddk-> gradually low to high but ddkk-> half low half high )

• reverse these notes 01:58:072 (294,295) - . no idea for using oo since the snare comes out on 01:58:176 - and it would be better with a kat like 01:56:521 - pretty sure it was dk before lol. fixed!

• a kat 02:44:934 - . first to avoid that dondon everywhere =w= and second it could follow like a snare sound (?) which comes out there. same like 02:43:279 - which you used kat on katsus are cool

• add 0.80x on 02:50:365 - and change 02:50:727 - to be 0.85x. the function is to make the SV changes softer, especially from 02:50:727 - to 02:51:348 - when the notes are already dense with 1/4. so i increased the speed on 02:50:727 - and it would have a small increasing SV to 02:51:348 - (from 0.85x to 0.90x, just 0.05 changes) the timestamp you suggested isn't snapped lol did everything but had the 0.8 at 02:50:107 instead, hope it works too!

• here, a kat on 03:01:072 - . the vocal has increased a bit here. it can follow the snare sound too, but it's not really important since you don't really focus on it basically denied with the same reasoning as before

• this SV changes are too sudden on 03:43:555 - . actually it's no problem, but it would be better to make it a bittttt softer. it's easy, just add 1.10x on 03:43:072 - . the previous one is 1.00x ~> 1.15x , and now it will be 1.00x ~> 1.10x ~> 1.15x did something really similar

no for these SV changes 04:01:486 - ; 04:01:693 - ; 04:01:900 - . the notes are almost overlapped there. okay, it's not problem to keep that decreasing SV there, but you must do this. add 1.15x on 04:00:245 - which is fit with the stanza and change those three SV changes 04:01:486 - ; 04:01:693 - ; 04:01:900 - to be 1.10x ; 1.05x and 1.00x. you can see the result later and try to compare with yours looks cool i guess

• aha a kat on 04:48:658 - . same reason like the previous points aha


====================


let me decide this after you take a look my mods
Terima kasih ming!
mingmichael
okay then, just did a small IRC mod with cdh. we did some SV changes to make the speed changes smoother like 01:11:831 - and 02:50:314 - . the notes and patterns are also nice, nothing problem from them for me. so then, enjoy~




my first approval aaaaaaaaaaaa
Yumeno Himiko
gratz~~
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply