1. Disqualified for several SV issues and more:
2. 02:32:521 - Bugged barline which can be fixed by moving the inherited timeline forward.
3. 02:51:348 (140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,1,1) - This might be an subjecitce view but patterns with 1/3+1/4+SV changes+spinner are more than questionable. Everything is on a small spot which makes it really confusing. Short spinners are normaly something we should prevent. We also have it written down in the guidelines:
   

   Taiko Ranking Criteria wrote:

   Shakers (Spinners)
   Try to leave at least a 1/2 beat between a note and a spinner. Using them on streams may be okay. Short spinners are highly not recommended, since they cover the notes and can cause players to miss due to pressing too much.

4. 03:31:899 (210,211) - This should be made smoother. In the additional modding I have some examples.
5. 03:38:314 (240,241,242,243,244) - Transition isn't here smooth either.
6. 03:43:278 (5,6) - What happened here? Transition is really bad. Timeline is probably -1ms too late.
7. 04:08:521 - Bugged barline which can be fixed by moving the inherited timeline forward.
8. 04:56:521 - ^

1. 00:48:658 (1,2,3,4) - No 1/6, but should be fine I guess. Just wanted to mention it.
2. 00:49:693 (10) - Can be deleted. The transition doesn't look that nice from one to the other stanza because of the SV change. In case you are thinking about adding another SV change here for compensaiting this, I say, I wouldn't suggest you to do that. There is no real sound for this note anyway, and in this way both parts are seperated to each other in a better way (people can prepare for the 1/6 in a better way).
3. 00:49:900 - These kind of patterns are something I wouldn't support that much. But well, since it is monotonically it might be fine. You can reconsider it once again.
4. 01:11:417 - Transition here isn't that nice either. Little overlapping. Can be kept as x1.00 and at 01:11:831 have x0.90(while
5. 01:12:245 is x0.80). Would fit to the stanza as well.
6. 01:27:348 - Just keep it x1.20 if you ask me. Having such short SV changes with patterns is rather questionable to me.
7. 04:01:486 - Similar to previous mentioned case. Having now a deceleration doesn't seem to fit here. Even though I might understand the intention behind it, due to deeper voice. But better keep the SV the same or something like that.

Dainesl wrote:

on cutting edge there's a ton of unsnaps being reported for some reason

OnosakiHito wrote:

Reason for Disqualification

1. Disqualified for several SV issues and more:
2. 02:32:521 - Bugged barline which can be fixed by moving the inherited timeline forward. don
3. 02:51:348 (140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,1,1) - This might be an subjecitce view but patterns with 1/3+1/4+SV changes+spinner are more than questionable. Everything is on a small spot which makes it really confusing. Short spinners are normaly something we should prevent. We also have it written down in the guidelines: Deleted the note after the spinner to give players ample space to read the next notes
4. 03:31:899 (210,211) - This should be made smoother. In the additional modding I have some examples.
5. 03:38:314 (240,241,242,243,244) - Transition isn't here smooth either.
6. 03:43:278 (5,6) - What happened here? Transition is really bad. Timeline is probably -1ms too late. Regarding the mods for this part: made the sv changes smoother for this part in general (i think) while still having the same idea
7. 04:08:521 - Bugged barline which can be fixed by moving the inherited timeline forward. don
8. 04:56:521 - ^ did what tks suggested instead

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional Modding

Small modding. Didn't mentioned everything since I don't have much time.

1. 00:48:658 (1,2,3,4) - No 1/6, but should be fine I guess. Just wanted to mention it. yup its fine and cool
2. 00:49:693 (10) - Can be deleted. The transition doesn't look that nice from one to the other stanza because of the SV change. In case you are thinking about adding another SV change here for compensaiting this, I say, I wouldn't suggest you to do that. There is no real sound for this note anyway, and in this way both parts are seperated to each other in a better way (people can prepare for the 1/6 in a better way). eh but ;w; The pace in this kiai is pretty fast compared to the intro and the part after it so having a break won't fit really well >_> Not changing this for now since its not really game-breaking, but eh I might still change my mind later
3. 00:49:900 - These kind of patterns are something I wouldn't support that much. But well, since it is monotonically it might be fine. You can reconsider it once again. um no
4. 01:11:417 - Transition here isn't that nice either. Little overlapping. Can be kept as x1.00 and at 01:11:831 have x0.90(while
5. 01:12:245 is x0.80). Would fit to the stanza as well. Made 01:11:417 x0.95 to give players a hint to the slowdown part better, fixed everything else accordingly!
6. 01:27:348 - Just keep it x1.20 if you ask me. Having such short SV changes with patterns is rather questionable to me. a few people mentioned it already so yeah, changed
7. 04:01:486 - Similar to previous mentioned case. Having now a deceleration doesn't seem to fit here. Even though I might understand the intention behind it, due to deeper voice. But better keep the SV the same or something like that. but it looks really cool D:

Nwolf wrote:

woof woof BAKA woof baka indeed

[Bakadiff]

00:49:693 - Add another green bar with SV 1.07 for ~da smooth transition~ did x1.075 magic here k
05:03:555 - Add red timing section since the first beat shifted don

00:31:486 (146) - Change to kat to give ~~da bass dons~~ more emphasis k
01:49:900 (246) - 03:01:072 (53) - 04:48:658 (134) - idk I would've preferred kats on all these notes since you kinda have ~~~da snare rhythm~~~ here this is following ~~~da vocal pitches~~~ though
02:52:383 - Replace with another note and add 02:52:796 - something big here (preferably a big kat) i wanted to but a note there just doesn't feel as good somehow ;w;

mingmichael wrote:

finally ming comes =w= kenapa lewat =w= *me slaps*


Red ~> unrakable issue, must be changed
Blue ~> highly suggested, consider to use it
Black ~> suggestion, just free to choose it


====================


[ Maware??]

General

☞ okay

Notes Structure

☞ will mention many some suggestions for the SVs on the Notes box

Notes

• i agree with Ono for deleting 00:49:693 - . yeah i know that you wanna to follow the drum there or maybe you wanna fill with a note than break. yupp it's nice and i agree for adding it but i deleted this one to make the players prepare for the next patterns which start with 1/6 notes on 00:49:900 - and also it has decreasing SV there. deleting this note will help all the players especially for having a preparation to face the next patterns. anyway deleting this note doesn't hurt your patterns too *sighs* fixed

• a kat on 01:49:900 - please. the vocal has increased here even it's lower than 01:50:107 - though 01:50:107 's pitch is really much higher and i simply need to take that into account so having only that as a kat will describe the overall flow better (dddk-> gradually low to high but ddkk-> half low half high )

• reverse these notes 01:58:072 (294,295) - . no idea for using oo since the snare comes out on 01:58:176 - and it would be better with a kat like 01:56:521 - pretty sure it was dk before lol. fixed!

• a kat 02:44:934 - . first to avoid that dondon everywhere =w= and second it could follow like a snare sound (?) which comes out there. same like 02:43:279 - which you used kat on katsus are cool

• add 0.80x on 02:50:365 - and change 02:50:727 - to be 0.85x. the function is to make the SV changes softer, especially from 02:50:727 - to 02:51:348 - when the notes are already dense with 1/4. so i increased the speed on 02:50:727 - and it would have a small increasing SV to 02:51:348 - (from 0.85x to 0.90x, just 0.05 changes) the timestamp you suggested isn't snapped lol did everything but had the 0.8 at 02:50:107 instead, hope it works too！

• here, a kat on 03:01:072 - . the vocal has increased a bit here. it can follow the snare sound too, but it's not really important since you don't really focus on it basically denied with the same reasoning as before

• this SV changes are too sudden on 03:43:555 - . actually it's no problem, but it would be better to make it a bittttt softer. it's easy, just add 1.10x on 03:43:072 - . the previous one is 1.00x ~> 1.15x , and now it will be 1.00x ~> 1.10x ~> 1.15x did something really similar

• no for these SV changes 04:01:486 - ; 04:01:693 - ; 04:01:900 - . the notes are almost overlapped there. okay, it's not problem to keep that decreasing SV there, but you must do this. add 1.15x on 04:00:245 - which is fit with the stanza and change those three SV changes 04:01:486 - ; 04:01:693 - ; 04:01:900 - to be 1.10x ; 1.05x and 1.00x. you can see the result later and try to compare with yours looks cool i guess

• aha a kat on 04:48:658 - . same reason like the previous points aha

====================


let me decide this after you take a look my mods

Stefan wrote:

god bless this doesn't become smacked again, moved to Pending.

1. 純粹建議,我覺得HP 6就夠了,6.5感絕對高於5分鐘的歌有點太高了
2. 05:03:141 - 這裡要加一條有設置omit first bar line 的紅線

qoot8123 wrote:

[General]

1. 純粹建議,我覺得HP 6就夠了,6.5感絕對高於5分鐘的歌有點太高了 好吧
2. 05:03:141 - 這裡要加一條有設置omit first bar line 的紅線 改了
   

Stefan wrote:

I give it six days.

SPOILER

SPOILER