This looks so forced.Irreversible wrote:
Alright Caligno, your activity increased, and currently there's no sense to leave the vote on you. What bothers me though that you mostly say 'this is wrong, you've thought about that wrong' etc.
This looks so forced.Irreversible wrote:
Alright Caligno, your activity increased, and currently there's no sense to leave the vote on you. What bothers me though that you mostly say 'this is wrong, you've thought about that wrong' etc.
I don't always use it, since i prefer working with flips. This game, nope I haven't used it.Irreversible wrote:
Sakura, did you work like this method you've just pointed out?
This is exactly what is scummy about your questions, you're only asking him about me or rEdo and ignoring the rest of the playerlist, if you asked him to give his thoughts on everyone then probably it wouldn't be as bad (or not bad at all)Quotes wrote:
Tl;dr answer my questions
What do you think of redo?
What do you think of Sakura?
If you had to choose which one you found more scummy than the other, which would you choose and why?
he's posted his thoughts with proper reasoning, and that was enough (for now) to make me think he's town. I'm keeping my eye on him, though.Quotes wrote:
@rEdo, what did Irreversible do to earn enough "townie points" for you to take your vote off of him?
like I said, I haven't heard a word from kook yet, and this is where I ask you the same question - please give me a reason why you aren't scum. that whole accusiation just pings me even harder that you've got potential to be scum. I could also browse through your ISO thoroughly, but you just popped out of nowhere and picked a person which changed his opinions more than everybody else, which places me in a worse spot as a townie just in order to get an easy lynch today.Me thinking you are scum does not make me scum. I've already called out the most active player (Sakura) on shit and will continue to do so, since everyone else but Caligno seems unwilling to do so. I posted the ISO on you because you stood out the most as the most obvious scum. The Sakura thing came later when I asked myself who would be your most likely partner. My posts have been spur of the moment and honest in my own estimation, although I can see if you have trouble seeing that I am being honest with calling you scum! I also apparently didn't fail whatever test Sakura was doing. I've explained most of my thoughts regarding lynches and on who I believe scum to be and have backed them up with evidence.
I didn't necessarily change the habit of buddying since I tagged along Sakura in Irreversible's case.Quotes wrote:
@rEdo, why would you buddy in past games, but only change now that habit? I can imagine you have been called out on this before. Why make this change NOW?
I was referring to where you said "but I won't do it anymore," not to what you did beforehand.rEdo wrote:
I didn't necessarily change the habit of buddying since I tagged along Sakura in Irreversible's case.Quotes wrote:
@rEdo, why would you buddy in past games, but only change now that habit? I can imagine you have been called out on this before. Why make this change NOW?
providing you're scum, that would be a really comfortable play for you to start accusing people right off the bat when you get into the game in like the 18th page where your predecessor hasn't said virtually anything, and nobody really has any argument to use against you yet, even though kook was considered scummy before.Quotes wrote:
@redo, so to clarify, you find me scummy because I wanted people to focus on you and Sakura?
people tend to bitch about that in my every game, and I grew tired of it. >_>"Quotes wrote:
I was referring to where you said "but I won't do it anymore," not to what you did beforehand.
How do you vote people based merely on activity and then unvoting when he started posting again?Irreversible wrote:
Unvote
Alright Caligno, your activity increased, and currently there's no sense to leave the vote on you. What bothers me though that you mostly say 'this is wrong, you've thought about that wrong' etc.
Fair and accurate ISo of a scummy player with 0 complaints from anyone, including little to no answer or justification from the player that I iso'd.Irreversible wrote:
If it approves that you're scum i'm going to vote caligno next, because you always are talking super suspciously good about him, which is not a good idea imo.
and wtf, that escalated quickly. quotes it seems like you're panicking right now? for my question: currently, i think both are town. but as I said, it depends what happens next.
Quotes, give me some exact reason why I should think you're town
Circumstantial, I legitimately thought he was the most town player. I know I can't really prove that thoughIrreversible wrote:
was this just a statement that you're definetly scum quotes? Dake joins the game, you want him to be your friend, this seems odd to me.
Because players not named calignobot are scared of you and you as the person leading discussions had said nothing about redoSakura wrote:
If people hasnt focused on us, there must be a reason, I do thank you for showing me the fishy behavior rEdo had been doing because I was missing it (I'm a sucker for buddying)
And if you didnt want to claim because of your predecessor's PR slip, scum knows who they are and would remember your predecessor's PR slip anyways, so you were condemned during the night already, oh the plus side if there's a doctor they might protect you tonight, but that would mean they have a RB and you'd pretty much be a named townie.yes, this is true. If we do have a doctor and it's row 2 then it would probably still be best if they do protect Quotes since he's the most likely to be killed. Though I guess they could just roleblock him rather than trying to kill him but even without a night action a semi-confirmed town is still useful
I just mentioned all possible Counter Claims to the Cop claim, so don't worry, basically if any role is not aligned horizontally or vertically with one they cannot exist together and is a good Counter Claim (or CCing with the exact same role that was claimed)Irreversible wrote:
I'm confused about the roles again.. can't make any connections I get the matrix 6 thing, but yeah that's basically it :/
Rules wrote:
If majority isn't reached, there will be no lynch so you know...
..are you stressed by smth or so? u.uCalignoBot wrote:
Are you already voting him?
I'm in a hurry since the deadline is pretty much slapping us on the ass.Irreversible wrote:
..are you stressed by smth or so? u.uCalignoBot wrote:
Are you already voting him?
FoS: SakuraSakura wrote:
That was expected, Man I need to stop being weak to buddying, since scum decided to kill him rather block him it's quite probably they dont have a Roleblocker, which means we also dont have a Doctor, so it's pretty mountainous from here on.
1. I really can't tell if this is a scumslip or not. Either way, it's a variant of the "damn it" tell, or whatever it's officially called.Sakura wrote:
1. That was expected, 2. Man I need to stop being weak to buddying, 3. since scum decided to kill him rather block him it's quite probably they dont have a Roleblocker, which means we also dont have a Doctor, so it's pretty mountainous from here on.
quality contentSenaSaki wrote:
defeatist sakura is usually scum sakura
afaik rEdo was using pointing out inactivity for towncredSakura wrote:
Hmm I guess I see your point, I was thinking more on Saki tbh, since rEdo focused on Royston's and kook's inactivity but he ignored Saki completely.