Vote: reDo
I've read through your posts and the others arguments, and it makes sense actually.
I've read through your posts and the others arguments, and it makes sense actually.
..are you stressed by smth or so? u.uCalignoBot wrote:
Are you already voting him?
I'm in a hurry since the deadline is pretty much slapping us on the ass.Irreversible wrote:
..are you stressed by smth or so? u.uCalignoBot wrote:
Are you already voting him?
FoS: SakuraSakura wrote:
That was expected, Man I need to stop being weak to buddying, since scum decided to kill him rather block him it's quite probably they dont have a Roleblocker, which means we also dont have a Doctor, so it's pretty mountainous from here on.
1. I really can't tell if this is a scumslip or not. Either way, it's a variant of the "damn it" tell, or whatever it's officially called.Sakura wrote:
1. That was expected, 2. Man I need to stop being weak to buddying, 3. since scum decided to kill him rather block him it's quite probably they dont have a Roleblocker, which means we also dont have a Doctor, so it's pretty mountainous from here on.
quality contentSenaSaki wrote:
defeatist sakura is usually scum sakura
afaik rEdo was using pointing out inactivity for towncredSakura wrote:
Hmm I guess I see your point, I was thinking more on Saki tbh, since rEdo focused on Royston's and kook's inactivity but he ignored Saki completely.
I thought the two cop setups was cop/2goon and doc-cop/1rb 1goonCalignoBot wrote:
The cop dying kind of makes roleblocker close to impossible.
did not consider thatCalignoBot wrote:
Yes, and the only way cop would end up dying is if the doctor was roleblocked. That's a huge gamble.
Sakura wrote:
Hi Saki, wanna 1v1 tunnel here too?
SenaSaki wrote:
"extending RVS is a SCUMTELL!"
uh no 1v1 is bad
cool, Sakura's town
SenaSaki wrote:
scum doesn't want a 1v1 ever
and i doubt scum sakura would buddy up to me
well now that i think about it it might be a fake townslip