LOL, please explain why. I can understand if I hurt your feeling by calling you out on your bad early game play but you having a complex about that does not justify a vote on me.
...No? The best way to show you're innocent is to show you're innocent, not tell people that you're innocent. Of course, you also heavily limited his ability to show his innocence by reducing his options of building a case to one other person.Quotes wrote:
To answer why someone is scum mixer than you, typically it is important to explain why you yourself are not scummy.
I guess it does miscommunicate my beliefs.Sakura wrote:
IC Hat.
If you're not voting your top scumread you are doing something wrong.
A vote implies by all means that it is your top scumread, use FoS for anything else.
A vote is movement towards you agreeing that the person deserves to death, so obviously you would be voting for the person you think is most likely to flip scum.
And there's no ambiguity with votes, Anyone can ask you "Why are you voting X?" while if someone asks you "Why are you suspecting X" you can say "No im not suspecting him, you may think i have implied it because Y"
/IC Hat
This looks so forced.Irreversible wrote:
Alright Caligno, your activity increased, and currently there's no sense to leave the vote on you. What bothers me though that you mostly say 'this is wrong, you've thought about that wrong' etc.
I don't always use it, since i prefer working with flips. This game, nope I haven't used it.Irreversible wrote:
Sakura, did you work like this method you've just pointed out?
This is exactly what is scummy about your questions, you're only asking him about me or rEdo and ignoring the rest of the playerlist, if you asked him to give his thoughts on everyone then probably it wouldn't be as bad (or not bad at all)Quotes wrote:
Tl;dr answer my questions
What do you think of redo?
What do you think of Sakura?
If you had to choose which one you found more scummy than the other, which would you choose and why?
he's posted his thoughts with proper reasoning, and that was enough (for now) to make me think he's town. I'm keeping my eye on him, though.Quotes wrote:
@rEdo, what did Irreversible do to earn enough "townie points" for you to take your vote off of him?
like I said, I haven't heard a word from kook yet, and this is where I ask you the same question - please give me a reason why you aren't scum. that whole accusiation just pings me even harder that you've got potential to be scum. I could also browse through your ISO thoroughly, but you just popped out of nowhere and picked a person which changed his opinions more than everybody else, which places me in a worse spot as a townie just in order to get an easy lynch today.Me thinking you are scum does not make me scum. I've already called out the most active player (Sakura) on shit and will continue to do so, since everyone else but Caligno seems unwilling to do so. I posted the ISO on you because you stood out the most as the most obvious scum. The Sakura thing came later when I asked myself who would be your most likely partner. My posts have been spur of the moment and honest in my own estimation, although I can see if you have trouble seeing that I am being honest with calling you scum! I also apparently didn't fail whatever test Sakura was doing. I've explained most of my thoughts regarding lynches and on who I believe scum to be and have backed them up with evidence.
I didn't necessarily change the habit of buddying since I tagged along Sakura in Irreversible's case.Quotes wrote:
@rEdo, why would you buddy in past games, but only change now that habit? I can imagine you have been called out on this before. Why make this change NOW?