Lol, if you wanna add me, Agnes, be my guest (if that's what you were getting at). =P
i love that fireworks <3tyrael6192 wrote:
that new corki skin art <3 haven't seen it in game yet, but dang
It's obvious you spammed Q in the Twilight shroud, right? I mean, that Akali was so noob, you can't hide with the W if you're vsing Riven loltyrael6192 wrote:
get first blood vs akali as riven
get accused of hacks because i can 'see through stealth'
endgame "gg game won by a hacker hope you're proud"
holy..... *_*Hakeru wrote:
Sona new splash just hnghhhh much;;;
Aye, stunned, ignited, spam q in shroud. das hax tho u cant do thatThunderHat wrote:
It's obvious you spammed Q in the Twilight shroud, right? I mean, that Akali was so noob, you can't hide with the W if you're vsing Riven lol
I used to get stuff like this a lot. Warwick is so under played that people don't know that his E gives true vision in bushes and fog of war. loltyrael6192 wrote:
get first blood vs akali as riven
get accused of hacks because i can 'see through stealth'
endgame "gg game won by a hacker hope you're proud"
People hack this game? o_Otyrael6192 wrote:
get first blood vs akali as riven
get accused of hacks because i can 'see through stealth'
endgame "gg game won by a hacker hope you're proud"
I'm shocked at how stupid the League community is sometimes...tyrael6192 wrote:
No hahaha, never seen anyone do it since dr terrible back whenever with the 100% cdr on flash... this game seems pretty hack-proof tbh oO makes it all the more silly that she would assume i was hacking
Well, any free online strategy game is a retard magnet, but in LoL you can just avoid those by being a good player and playing ranked gamestyrael6192 wrote:
You get used to it
It's like the retard magnet of the gaming world
lol'dThunderHat wrote:
Well, any free online strategy game is a retard magnet, but in LoL you can just avoid those by being a good player and playing ranked gamestyrael6192 wrote:
You get used to it
It's like the retard magnet of the gaming world
Any game is a retard magnet. I point specifically to WoW.tyrael6192 wrote:
You get used to it
It's like the retard magnet of the gaming world
No.ThunderHat wrote:
Well, any free online strategy game is a retard magnet, but in LoL you can just avoid those by being a good player and playing ranked gamestyrael6192 wrote:
You get used to it
It's like the retard magnet of the gaming world
what happens is people want to win so there's kind of an element of forced cooperation... you won't instalock quite as often because it just jeopardizes your chances of winning, and you won't go all out troll modeJustykanna wrote:
I've never played ranked (and I'm not even level 30), so I could be wrong, but wouldn't ranked just mean you're playing for a rating?
In no way do League players need to be 'good' to start ranked, it's just about longevity.
I usually play normal with three or four friends so I'm probably not exposed to the general community as much as others have.tyrael6192 wrote:
what happens is people want to win so there's kind of an element of forced cooperation... you won't instalock quite as often because it just jeopardizes your chances of winning, and you won't go all out troll mode
but semi-repressing your urge to be a cunt isn't the same thing as being nice so tl;dr everyone is still a cunt
also my point is it's more noticeable in league (and therefore other moba games or team games) because you actually have to rely to an extent on the randoms you get matched with in order to win, as opposed to games that are ffa and such
That's why my friends and I prefer doing such. Randoms make things annoying.Vulf wrote:
If you can avoid solo queue with premade games then do it. Solo queue is awful most of the time.
Looks like Nasus+Anivia put together in a Mixer. LOLHakeru wrote:
http://www.elohell.net/chill/211548
new champion? i don't even--
That's the idea. I'm all for another egyptian god based champion, but sadly this is fan made.GeeNX wrote:
looks like Ra, one of egipcian's god
Cassiopeia = MedusaHakeru wrote:
i see :/ , i think it would be nice if riot make a champ based on greek myth
NikFreaX wrote:
Oh, how I wish that was true.ThunderHat wrote:
but in LoL you can just avoid those by being a good player and playing ranked games
I added you to my Friends List, Agnes.Agnes wrote:
Anyway, Zero and I here are likely to play some normals today. Does anybody wish to join us later? We're in NA and PBE.
YOU BELONG IN A MUSEUMAgnes wrote:
'ay 'ayzerothefallen wrote:
sona confirmed for taking 7/8 of Ez's kills
I think she belongs in a museum.
i don't mean to kill people; they shouldn't be standing still
Anyway, Zero and I here are likely to play some normals today. Does anybody wish to join us later? We're in NA and PBE.
I'd be fine with them not making any new champions at all for a few months. They really need to take the time to fix some of the champions that are just plain awful eg warwick, karma, heimer, sion, gangplank and poppy (just to name a few) will never see competitive play with how nonviable they are. "Money > People" that may be true, but there is also a thing called powercreep that can easily sneak up and do some damage to a games population. With the recent champions that have come out there is basically no reason to play some of the older ones unless your trying to fill a niche role. Why should I be reported, and called a troll for playing my favorite champions? lolGeeNX wrote:
@Hakeru: Yeah me too, not just greek, other ones from others mythologies, like from vikings, though olaf is from there, but could be others too, anyways that champs are funny...and I dont know, I think riot could do a champ every 2 months or that based on fan's idea, most voted ones, or something like that, the idea that WE , players, could help designing a champ, I think would be so nice, they do like 2 , 3 champs then 1 with some ideas from gamers, I think would be nice though riot is totally
Money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People
Sadly
Ww is fine.Vulf wrote:
I'd be fine with them not making any new champions at all for a few months. They really need to take the time to fix some of the champions that are just plain awful eg warwick, karma, heimer, sion, gangplank and poppy (just to name a few) will never see competitive play with how nonviable they are. "Money > People" that may be true, but there is also a thing called powercreep that can easily sneak up and do some damage to a games population. With the recent champions that have come out there is basically no reason to play some of the older ones unless your trying to fill a niche role. Why should I be reported, and called a troll for playing my favorite champions? lolGeeNX wrote:
@Hakeru: Yeah me too, not just greek, other ones from others mythologies, like from vikings, though olaf is from there, but could be others too, anyways that champs are funny...and I dont know, I think riot could do a champ every 2 months or that based on fan's idea, most voted ones, or something like that, the idea that WE , players, could help designing a champ, I think would be so nice, they do like 2 , 3 champs then 1 with some ideas from gamers, I think would be nice though riot is totally
Money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People
Sadly
Also there are tons of champions that they can make skins for so it's not like they will lose a lot of revenue for slowing champion releases.
All of them are viable, you just can't play them properly. Pros don't use them because there are other champs that do their job better. Viable in the pro scene =/= viable in general.Vulf wrote:
warwick, karma, heimer, sion, gangplank and poppy
His clear is below average, and his pre 6 ganks are terrible cause you have to rely on your lanes to have some sort of stun to get a successful gank (people literally walk away from you pre 6 lol). He has good sustain. His first clear leaves you with about 90%+ hp, but this is a terrible trade off with how bad his clear speed and pre 6 ganks are. Yes any cc will basically cancel his ult. He has been played in so few amount of games that the bug on his ult (that has been there for over a year now) hasn't been fixed or even acknowledged by riot yet. He also has one of the lowest mana pools in the game ( 3 Q's and your out of mana). 90% of the items he builds got nerfed in season 3 with a gold cost increase. This is already bad for a jungler who can be starved for gold easily. Lanewick is too niche to play above 1500 elo.WishfulFiction wrote:
ww buff soon(tm)
I think it's because his clear is mediocre, and pretty bad later on into the game because he has no aoe
also because his ultimate is game changing for mid game but then does nothing late game because it does nothing in team fights if your opponents have any cc
i do agree, the only thing i liked about WW is his sustain and ult (his autos are so annoying to play with)Vulf wrote:
His clear is below average, and his pre 6 ganks are terrible cause you have to rely on your lanes to have some sort of stun to get a successful gank (people literally walk away from you pre 6 lol). He has good sustain. His first clear leaves you with about 90%+ hp, but this is a terrible trade off with how bad his clear speed and pre 6 ganks are. Yes any cc will basically cancel his ult. He has been played in so few amount of games that the bug on his ult (that has been there for over a year now) hasn't been fixed or even acknowledged by riot yet. He also has one of the lowest mana pools in the game ( 3 Q's and your out of mana). 90% of the items he builds got nerfed in season 3 with a gold cost increase. This is already bad for a jungler who can be starved for gold easily. Lanewick is too niche to play above 1500 elo.WishfulFiction wrote:
ww buff soon(tm)
I think it's because his clear is mediocre, and pretty bad later on into the game because he has no aoe
also because his ultimate is game changing for mid game but then does nothing late game because it does nothing in team fights if your opponents have any cc
I think riot is going to rework him. Some of his kit is outdated ( his E for example) compared to a lot of the newer stuff that has come out since 2012.
count me in o/Agnes wrote:
Anyway, Zero and I here are likely to play some normals today. Does anybody wish to join us later? We're in NA and PBE.
His sustain is only good if he is ignored. With 3+ ignites in every game now he has a hard time doing what his kit is meant to do, and that is fine since it's a counter anyways.brikepicness wrote:
i do agree, the only thing i liked about WW is his sustain and ult (his autos are so annoying to play with)
Vulf wrote:
The new botrk will be decent on him now that it gives stats he wants. He can only use half of that item currently lol.
He wins certain match ups top. Thing with elise is her early game is way better than his and she out ranges him by a lot but when you hit 4 it's about even. He is very niche for top lane especially when 2 wards 9 pots is a thing now.
I hope the buff he gets isn't some number change cause that will probably just get him nerfed again.
I've seen very few in normal.brikepicness wrote:
True, the funny thing is that now i hardy see any WW players at all '~'
ya, i thought you were talking about fiddlesticksthose wrote:
Oh should've checked you were referring to Kass
I know a lot of people who don't like melee in most games that include combat so you are no exception, based on what I've seen through the years. =PAoriki wrote:
I do need more champs. The fact I lack on them is pretty sad. I wanna try melee's but...I'm the type who goes for range then close range
What, that's insane, lol.tyrael6192 wrote:
've seen some galio supports and he can be quite good what with the shield and the aoe slow, as well as his ult at 6
but his passive and mr are useless for bot lane, which is quite unfortunate. back in the days you'd go mid with null-magic mantle and pots, have like 70mr and 50 ap at level 1...
because MR items for tanks no longer exist except for runic bulwarkVulf wrote:
I used to play galio support often. He is very mana hungry and has a long CD on his only support ability. You'd be better off playing janna or taric for the same effect.
Galio top lane is kinda bad now with what is very popular in that lane. His mid is decent, but definitely lacking.
I am not a fan of Taric or Janna. =PVulf wrote:
I used to play galio support often. He is very mana hungry and has a long CD on his only support ability. You'd be better off playing janna or taric for the same effect.
Galio top lane is kinda bad now with what is very popular in that lane. His mid is decent, but definitely lacking.
Yeah, I used the Chalice a few times.WishfulFiction wrote:
because MR items for tanks no longer exist except for runic bulwark
spirit visage is somewhat viable, but it got nerfed
edit:
actually I'm wrong
chalice/abyssal is good
its more because of the focus on AD scaling champs in the current meta that makes galio less viable
He seemed pretty strong early game, yeah.tyrael6192 wrote:
his early game damage is scary as hell but come lategame he's basically just a shieldbot for the carry and a flash ult engage man
What's a kit?Vulf wrote:
Let me put it this way. Galio needs items to scale into the game which he wouldn't get as a 0 cs support (this is why karma is a bad support). In other words no it won't work most of the time because of heavy mana cost meaning he has to spend 900 extra gold to help his ADC, and he has long CD's on everything but his Q. He needs specific items to get going.
To answer another question. There are some champions in this game that aren't viable hence why some stuff get kit reworks.
Edit: The reason he isn't very good mid/top anymore is because of all the random AD bruiser and casters that got major buffs in season 3 making it hard for him to lane. It's not that he isn't viable he just fell out of favor. The whole point of his kit is to be the counter to all AP, but seeing as AP carries aren't the only thing that goes mid anymore it has dwindled him to a niche pick.
What's wrong with Kayle? She's a fantastic champion. =/BrokenArrow wrote:
Am I the only one who wants this fucking Kayle to get removed from this game immediately
Yeah, but it takes someone of decent skill to do that. I'm still slightly new to the game so I'm not really aiming for such at the moment.tyrael6192 wrote:
something can be underplayed but still really strong
I don't have any standard supports that I like yet. Any suggestions?Vulf wrote:
You can play galio support, but don't expect it to ever out perform any of the standard supports that can do what he does but way better. Heck i used to play ashe and caitlyn support awhile back lol. If your playing 5's and they don't mind you playing unconventional supports then go for it, but in solo que you'll probably end up getting banned for playing against the meta. I learned this after i got a suspension for playing roam annie like 5 games in a row.
Was not a fan of Leona, Blitzcrank or Thresh.Vulf wrote:
If you like playing bruiser type champions you might like Leona, Blitzcrank, Thresh, Nunu, or Alistar all of those are very good supports. Generally anything that has hard CC (non ults preferably), sustain, a steroid and doesn't need items to scale as the game progresses usually makes a decent 0 cs support. There are also the unconventional (these are champions that can support, but they aren't very strong at that role) supports like galio, shen, mundo, gangplank, malphite etc.. If you ever decide to go into solo queue ranked i would advise not playing these cause people will complain.
Well according to riot you cannot get banned for playing against the meta, but you can get banned for failing to communicate with your team. This is what riots support told me when i asked about my ban last year lol. If your team is fine with you playing against the meta then it's okay, but if pre game chat explodes about you playing something crazy like jungle Vlad then the odds are you will eventually get banned after a few reports. lol
Not really, double bruiser bot lanes work fine if you know how to play them. You just focus on killing/zoning more than farming/protecting AD. If done correctly, you can deny the enemy AD hard and pick up some kills on the wayVulf wrote:
Exactly stuff like shen and mundo work much better in other places, but they could go bot lane as a support. They just won't be as good as actual supports most of the time.
Well you shouldn't have to worry about stuff like that in premades, but in solo queue it's definitely reportable. lol
You just described Warwick. LOLKanye West wrote:
Obviously don't pick a jungler that is terrible at clearing jungle and/or ganking