No hahaha, never seen anyone do it since dr terrible back whenever with the 100% cdr on flash... this game seems pretty hack-proof tbh oO makes it all the more silly that she would assume i was hacking
forum
League of Legends
posted
Total Posts
14,940
I'm shocked at how stupid the League community is sometimes...tyrael6192 wrote:
No hahaha, never seen anyone do it since dr terrible back whenever with the 100% cdr on flash... this game seems pretty hack-proof tbh oO makes it all the more silly that she would assume i was hacking
You get used to it
It's like the retard magnet of the gaming world
It's like the retard magnet of the gaming world
Well, any free online strategy game is a retard magnet, but in LoL you can just avoid those by being a good player and playing ranked gamestyrael6192 wrote:
You get used to it
It's like the retard magnet of the gaming world
lol'dThunderHat wrote:
Well, any free online strategy game is a retard magnet, but in LoL you can just avoid those by being a good player and playing ranked gamestyrael6192 wrote:
You get used to it
It's like the retard magnet of the gaming world
Any game is a retard magnet. I point specifically to WoW.tyrael6192 wrote:
You get used to it
It's like the retard magnet of the gaming world
A game retard magnetic power is related to how newbie friendly it is, sadly most games are. 
NikFreaX
No.ThunderHat wrote:
Well, any free online strategy game is a retard magnet, but in LoL you can just avoid those by being a good player and playing ranked gamestyrael6192 wrote:
You get used to it
It's like the retard magnet of the gaming world
I've never played ranked (and I'm not even level 30), so I could be wrong, but wouldn't ranked just mean you're playing for a rating?
In no way do League players need to be 'good' to start ranked, it's just about longevity.
In no way do League players need to be 'good' to start ranked, it's just about longevity.
what happens is people want to win so there's kind of an element of forced cooperation... you won't instalock quite as often because it just jeopardizes your chances of winning, and you won't go all out troll modeJustykanna wrote:
I've never played ranked (and I'm not even level 30), so I could be wrong, but wouldn't ranked just mean you're playing for a rating?
In no way do League players need to be 'good' to start ranked, it's just about longevity.
but semi-repressing your urge to be a cunt isn't the same thing as being nice so tl;dr everyone is still a cunt
also my point is it's more noticeable in league (and therefore other moba games or team games) because you actually have to rely to an extent on the randoms you get matched with in order to win, as opposed to games that are ffa and such
http://www.lolsummoners.com/search?regi ... =sakujoyou
great website to keep track of your progress since there is no ranking system on the official website.
great website to keep track of your progress since there is no ranking system on the official website.
I usually play normal with three or four friends so I'm probably not exposed to the general community as much as others have.tyrael6192 wrote:
what happens is people want to win so there's kind of an element of forced cooperation... you won't instalock quite as often because it just jeopardizes your chances of winning, and you won't go all out troll mode
but semi-repressing your urge to be a cunt isn't the same thing as being nice so tl;dr everyone is still a cunt
also my point is it's more noticeable in league (and therefore other moba games or team games) because you actually have to rely to an extent on the randoms you get matched with in order to win, as opposed to games that are ffa and such
Yeah, you do have to rely on randoms, so point taken.
If you can avoid solo queue with premade games then do it. Solo queue is awful most of the time.
That's why my friends and I prefer doing such. Randoms make things annoying.Vulf wrote:
If you can avoid solo queue with premade games then do it. Solo queue is awful most of the time.
Nope. This was posted on the NA forums last year. From what i remember it was a contest thing.
However, there is a new champion that's underway. I think it falls under the name of Quinn / Quin, assumed to be a Demacian counterpart of Swain. And an AD Carry. This is just what I heard, though.
Looks like Nasus+Anivia put together in a Mixer. LOLHakeru wrote:
http://www.elohell.net/chill/211548
new champion? i don't even--
looks like Ra, one of egipcian's god
That's the idea. I'm all for another egyptian god based champion, but sadly this is fan made.GeeNX wrote:
looks like Ra, one of egipcian's god
i see :/ , i think it would be nice if riot make a champ based on greek myth
Cassiopeia = MedusaHakeru wrote:
i see :/ , i think it would be nice if riot make a champ based on greek myth
?
ikr , but i want more lol
NikFreaX wrote:
Oh, how I wish that was true.ThunderHat wrote:
but in LoL you can just avoid those by being a good player and playing ranked games
But it is.
Sure I occasionally enjoy 5s with close friends or people from the /v/ chat but solo queue is becoming fun for me as well. Every game with and against diamond players, couple of famous names here and there and the games are challenging and fun. Though there are known trolls which I try to avoid by dodging(you barely lose any LP) ranked solo is basically the place I go to improve while having fun.
zerothefallen
@Hakeru: Yeah me too, not just greek, other ones from others mythologies, like from vikings, though olaf is from there, but could be others too, anyways that champs are funny...and I dont know, I think riot could do a champ every 2 months or that based on fan's idea, most voted ones, or something like that, the idea that WE , players, could help designing a champ, I think would be so nice, they do like 2 , 3 champs then 1 with some ideas from gamers, I think would be nice though riot is totally
Money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People
Sadly
Money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People
Sadly
I added you to my Friends List, Agnes.Agnes wrote:
Anyway, Zero and I here are likely to play some normals today. Does anybody wish to join us later? We're in NA and PBE.
Poke me if you decide to go and I'm around (and you want an extra body) =P.
zerothefallen
YOU BELONG IN A MUSEUMAgnes wrote:
'ay 'ayzerothefallen wrote:
sona confirmed for taking 7/8 of Ez's kills
I think she belongs in a museum.
i don't mean to kill people; they shouldn't be standing still
Anyway, Zero and I here are likely to play some normals today. Does anybody wish to join us later? We're in NA and PBE.
I'd be fine with them not making any new champions at all for a few months. They really need to take the time to fix some of the champions that are just plain awful eg warwick, karma, heimer, sion, gangplank and poppy (just to name a few) will never see competitive play with how nonviable they are. "Money > People" that may be true, but there is also a thing called powercreep that can easily sneak up and do some damage to a games population. With the recent champions that have come out there is basically no reason to play some of the older ones unless your trying to fill a niche role. Why should I be reported, and called a troll for playing my favorite champions? lolGeeNX wrote:
@Hakeru: Yeah me too, not just greek, other ones from others mythologies, like from vikings, though olaf is from there, but could be others too, anyways that champs are funny...and I dont know, I think riot could do a champ every 2 months or that based on fan's idea, most voted ones, or something like that, the idea that WE , players, could help designing a champ, I think would be so nice, they do like 2 , 3 champs then 1 with some ideas from gamers, I think would be nice though riot is totally
Money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People
Sadly
Also there are tons of champions that they can make skins for so it's not like they will lose a lot of revenue for slowing champion releases.
zerothefallen
Ww is fine.Vulf wrote:
I'd be fine with them not making any new champions at all for a few months. They really need to take the time to fix some of the champions that are just plain awful eg warwick, karma, heimer, sion, gangplank and poppy (just to name a few) will never see competitive play with how nonviable they are. "Money > People" that may be true, but there is also a thing called powercreep that can easily sneak up and do some damage to a games population. With the recent champions that have come out there is basically no reason to play some of the older ones unless your trying to fill a niche role. Why should I be reported, and called a troll for playing my favorite champions? lolGeeNX wrote:
@Hakeru: Yeah me too, not just greek, other ones from others mythologies, like from vikings, though olaf is from there, but could be others too, anyways that champs are funny...and I dont know, I think riot could do a champ every 2 months or that based on fan's idea, most voted ones, or something like that, the idea that WE , players, could help designing a champ, I think would be so nice, they do like 2 , 3 champs then 1 with some ideas from gamers, I think would be nice though riot is totally
Money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People
Sadly
Also there are tons of champions that they can make skins for so it's not like they will lose a lot of revenue for slowing champion releases.
All of them are viable, you just can't play them properly. Pros don't use them because there are other champs that do their job better. Viable in the pro scene =/= viable in general.Vulf wrote:
warwick, karma, heimer, sion, gangplank and poppy
With over 1000 games with Warwick I can tell you he isn't in a good spot right now. He is getting a buff according to morello, but i'm not sure how long that will take. He was indirectly nerfed with S3 changes.
Karma, Sion and Heimer (confirmed by riot) are getting a rework, but it probably won't be for a bit much like the twitch and eve reworks took over a year.
Karma, Sion and Heimer (confirmed by riot) are getting a rework, but it probably won't be for a bit much like the twitch and eve reworks took over a year.
ww buff soon(tm)
I think it's because his clear is mediocre, and pretty bad later on into the game because he has no aoe
also because his ultimate is game changing for mid game but then does nothing late game because it does nothing in team fights if your opponents have any cc
I think it's because his clear is mediocre, and pretty bad later on into the game because he has no aoe
also because his ultimate is game changing for mid game but then does nothing late game because it does nothing in team fights if your opponents have any cc
His clear is below average, and his pre 6 ganks are terrible cause you have to rely on your lanes to have some sort of stun to get a successful gank (people literally walk away from you pre 6 lol). He has good sustain. His first clear leaves you with about 90%+ hp, but this is a terrible trade off with how bad his clear speed and pre 6 ganks are. Yes any cc will basically cancel his ult. He has been played in so few amount of games that the bug on his ult (that has been there for over a year now) hasn't been fixed or even acknowledged by riot yet. He also has one of the lowest mana pools in the game ( 3 Q's and your out of mana). 90% of the items he builds got nerfed in season 3 with a gold cost increase. This is already bad for a jungler who can be starved for gold easily. Lanewick is too niche to play above 1500 elo.WishfulFiction wrote:
ww buff soon(tm)
I think it's because his clear is mediocre, and pretty bad later on into the game because he has no aoe
also because his ultimate is game changing for mid game but then does nothing late game because it does nothing in team fights if your opponents have any cc
I think riot is going to rework him. Some of his kit is outdated ( his E for example) compared to a lot of the newer stuff that has come out since 2012.
i do agree, the only thing i liked about WW is his sustain and ult (his autos are so annoying to play with)Vulf wrote:
His clear is below average, and his pre 6 ganks are terrible cause you have to rely on your lanes to have some sort of stun to get a successful gank (people literally walk away from you pre 6 lol). He has good sustain. His first clear leaves you with about 90%+ hp, but this is a terrible trade off with how bad his clear speed and pre 6 ganks are. Yes any cc will basically cancel his ult. He has been played in so few amount of games that the bug on his ult (that has been there for over a year now) hasn't been fixed or even acknowledged by riot yet. He also has one of the lowest mana pools in the game ( 3 Q's and your out of mana). 90% of the items he builds got nerfed in season 3 with a gold cost increase. This is already bad for a jungler who can be starved for gold easily. Lanewick is too niche to play above 1500 elo.WishfulFiction wrote:
ww buff soon(tm)
I think it's because his clear is mediocre, and pretty bad later on into the game because he has no aoe
also because his ultimate is game changing for mid game but then does nothing late game because it does nothing in team fights if your opponents have any cc
I think riot is going to rework him. Some of his kit is outdated ( his E for example) compared to a lot of the newer stuff that has come out since 2012.
