If you can avoid solo queue with premade games then do it. Solo queue is awful most of the time.
That's why my friends and I prefer doing such. Randoms make things annoying.Vulf wrote:
If you can avoid solo queue with premade games then do it. Solo queue is awful most of the time.
Looks like Nasus+Anivia put together in a Mixer. LOLHakeru wrote:
http://www.elohell.net/chill/211548
new champion? i don't even--
That's the idea. I'm all for another egyptian god based champion, but sadly this is fan made.GeeNX wrote:
looks like Ra, one of egipcian's god
Cassiopeia = MedusaHakeru wrote:
i see :/ , i think it would be nice if riot make a champ based on greek myth
NikFreaX wrote:
Oh, how I wish that was true.ThunderHat wrote:
but in LoL you can just avoid those by being a good player and playing ranked games
I added you to my Friends List, Agnes.Agnes wrote:
Anyway, Zero and I here are likely to play some normals today. Does anybody wish to join us later? We're in NA and PBE.
YOU BELONG IN A MUSEUMAgnes wrote:
'ay 'ayzerothefallen wrote:
sona confirmed for taking 7/8 of Ez's kills
I think she belongs in a museum.
i don't mean to kill people; they shouldn't be standing still
Anyway, Zero and I here are likely to play some normals today. Does anybody wish to join us later? We're in NA and PBE.
I'd be fine with them not making any new champions at all for a few months. They really need to take the time to fix some of the champions that are just plain awful eg warwick, karma, heimer, sion, gangplank and poppy (just to name a few) will never see competitive play with how nonviable they are. "Money > People" that may be true, but there is also a thing called powercreep that can easily sneak up and do some damage to a games population. With the recent champions that have come out there is basically no reason to play some of the older ones unless your trying to fill a niche role. Why should I be reported, and called a troll for playing my favorite champions? lolGeeNX wrote:
@Hakeru: Yeah me too, not just greek, other ones from others mythologies, like from vikings, though olaf is from there, but could be others too, anyways that champs are funny...and I dont know, I think riot could do a champ every 2 months or that based on fan's idea, most voted ones, or something like that, the idea that WE , players, could help designing a champ, I think would be so nice, they do like 2 , 3 champs then 1 with some ideas from gamers, I think would be nice though riot is totally
Money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People
Sadly
Ww is fine.Vulf wrote:
I'd be fine with them not making any new champions at all for a few months. They really need to take the time to fix some of the champions that are just plain awful eg warwick, karma, heimer, sion, gangplank and poppy (just to name a few) will never see competitive play with how nonviable they are. "Money > People" that may be true, but there is also a thing called powercreep that can easily sneak up and do some damage to a games population. With the recent champions that have come out there is basically no reason to play some of the older ones unless your trying to fill a niche role. Why should I be reported, and called a troll for playing my favorite champions? lolGeeNX wrote:
@Hakeru: Yeah me too, not just greek, other ones from others mythologies, like from vikings, though olaf is from there, but could be others too, anyways that champs are funny...and I dont know, I think riot could do a champ every 2 months or that based on fan's idea, most voted ones, or something like that, the idea that WE , players, could help designing a champ, I think would be so nice, they do like 2 , 3 champs then 1 with some ideas from gamers, I think would be nice though riot is totally
Money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People
Sadly
Also there are tons of champions that they can make skins for so it's not like they will lose a lot of revenue for slowing champion releases.
All of them are viable, you just can't play them properly. Pros don't use them because there are other champs that do their job better. Viable in the pro scene =/= viable in general.Vulf wrote:
warwick, karma, heimer, sion, gangplank and poppy
His clear is below average, and his pre 6 ganks are terrible cause you have to rely on your lanes to have some sort of stun to get a successful gank (people literally walk away from you pre 6 lol). He has good sustain. His first clear leaves you with about 90%+ hp, but this is a terrible trade off with how bad his clear speed and pre 6 ganks are. Yes any cc will basically cancel his ult. He has been played in so few amount of games that the bug on his ult (that has been there for over a year now) hasn't been fixed or even acknowledged by riot yet. He also has one of the lowest mana pools in the game ( 3 Q's and your out of mana). 90% of the items he builds got nerfed in season 3 with a gold cost increase. This is already bad for a jungler who can be starved for gold easily. Lanewick is too niche to play above 1500 elo.WishfulFiction wrote:
ww buff soon(tm)
I think it's because his clear is mediocre, and pretty bad later on into the game because he has no aoe
also because his ultimate is game changing for mid game but then does nothing late game because it does nothing in team fights if your opponents have any cc
i do agree, the only thing i liked about WW is his sustain and ult (his autos are so annoying to play with)Vulf wrote:
His clear is below average, and his pre 6 ganks are terrible cause you have to rely on your lanes to have some sort of stun to get a successful gank (people literally walk away from you pre 6 lol). He has good sustain. His first clear leaves you with about 90%+ hp, but this is a terrible trade off with how bad his clear speed and pre 6 ganks are. Yes any cc will basically cancel his ult. He has been played in so few amount of games that the bug on his ult (that has been there for over a year now) hasn't been fixed or even acknowledged by riot yet. He also has one of the lowest mana pools in the game ( 3 Q's and your out of mana). 90% of the items he builds got nerfed in season 3 with a gold cost increase. This is already bad for a jungler who can be starved for gold easily. Lanewick is too niche to play above 1500 elo.WishfulFiction wrote:
ww buff soon(tm)
I think it's because his clear is mediocre, and pretty bad later on into the game because he has no aoe
also because his ultimate is game changing for mid game but then does nothing late game because it does nothing in team fights if your opponents have any cc
I think riot is going to rework him. Some of his kit is outdated ( his E for example) compared to a lot of the newer stuff that has come out since 2012.
count me in o/Agnes wrote:
Anyway, Zero and I here are likely to play some normals today. Does anybody wish to join us later? We're in NA and PBE.
His sustain is only good if he is ignored. With 3+ ignites in every game now he has a hard time doing what his kit is meant to do, and that is fine since it's a counter anyways.brikepicness wrote:
i do agree, the only thing i liked about WW is his sustain and ult (his autos are so annoying to play with)
Vulf wrote:
The new botrk will be decent on him now that it gives stats he wants. He can only use half of that item currently lol.
He wins certain match ups top. Thing with elise is her early game is way better than his and she out ranges him by a lot but when you hit 4 it's about even. He is very niche for top lane especially when 2 wards 9 pots is a thing now.
I hope the buff he gets isn't some number change cause that will probably just get him nerfed again.
I've seen very few in normal.brikepicness wrote:
True, the funny thing is that now i hardy see any WW players at all '~'