00:08:096 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I feel like the song is stronger than before, but easier. 00:09:415 (1,2,3,4) - I think it would be nice to make it harder by spacing them all similar to this.

00:54:909 (1,2,1,2) - The song is strong, but I feel like the spacing is a bit too much, and I think it would be nice to reduce it a bit.

00:08:096 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - The intensity of the song is getting stronger, but the pattern is the same as the previous section - 00:05:458 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - and it feels awkward, so I would like to see a variation by increasing the spacing or changing it to a circle.

00:30:513 (1,2,3) - I think it would be nice to have a little more spacing to emphasize the drum sound.

00:50:293 (1,2,3,4) - The song has more intensity than the previous section - 00:47:656 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - but I feel like 00:50:953 (3,4) - is a bit too closely spaced. Could you please widen the gap a bit more?

00:18:645 (1,2,3) - The song is stronger than the previous part, so I don't think the rhythm needs to be easier than the previous part, It would be nice if you could add a little more rhythm.

00:59:359 - 01:01:997 - 01:04:634 - 01:09:249 - 01:10:403 - 01:20:293 - 01:21:612 - The clap HS doesn't feel like it fits the song and sounds awkward, is it possible to change it to a drum hitsound like the other difficulties?

00:33:975 (5,6) - I think it would be nice to switch to a 1/1 slider or swap the rhythm to give the vocals a little more expression.

00:56:722 (3,4,1) - The spacing between each object is all similar, and the flow of 00:56:722 (3) - is pointing to 00:58:205 (1) -, which could lead to a reading mistake. I think it would be nice if you could make the space between 00:56:722 (3,1) - wider so that players don't make a reading mistake.

00:02:488 (1,2,3,4) - Compared to other places, the spacing is narrow and the stack doesn't seem to be necessary. I think it would be nice to have a little more spacing,

00:40:445 (4,1) - 00:40:673 (1) - The sound here is strong, so using a stack felt awkward, I think it would be a natural flow to represent it as a jump rather than a stack.

00:53:401 (3,4) - It's a 1/4 rhythm, but it looks like it's over-spaced and risks reading like a 1/2 rhythm. I want you to narrow the spacing so it's clear that it's 1/4.

01:09:538 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - 00:55:219 (5,6,1,2,3,4) - I understand the difference in vocals, but the difference in difficulty between the two was very noticeable. 01:09:538 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - I think it would be nice to add a slider here to make sure it doesn't get too dense.

00:07:261 - The song is subtly different from the previous part, and I feel like you didn't do a good job of expressing that variation. I think you can express the rhythm in this way to express the strong guitar notes here.

00:21:580 (7,8,9,10) - 00:36:127 (3,4,5,6) - Wouldn't the density be too much for the vocals to be non-existent? Since the vocals don't exist, I think you need to use something like a 1/1 slider to reduce the density of the rhythm.

00:14:761 (5) - I know the BPM is low, but I think using 1/4 rhythm on normal difficulty is too fast. It looks like you need to simplify to 1/2 rhythm.

00:27:262 (1,2,3) - They're all the same 1/2 rhythm, is there any reason why one is a stack and one isn't? I think the stack logic should be constant since it's a lower difficulty.

00:28:399 (4,1) - Isn't this a little too close to a 3/2 rhythm? I want you to do the DS exactly right.

00:49:310 (5) - It feels like the strongest sound in this section, but with only one reverse slider, it feels very weak in comparison. I think it would be nice to replace it with a circle to make it more expressive.

01:15:675 - Overall, you've expressed all of the vocals, so I don't think you need to skip this one.

01:16:357 (1,2,3,4) - The density seems to have suddenly increased, and I'd like to simplify it a bit.

00:54:310 (5,1,2,3,4) - The 1/2 rhythm feels a little long for easy difficulty, could you try making it a little easier?

01:31:131 - It would be nice to add a drum rhythm like the other sections.

00:41:877 (1,2,3) - I feel like the rhythm is a little too monotonous for how strong the sound is, and it would be nice if you could buff it up a bit more.

00:09:050 (1,2,3,1) - I think it would be nice to use symmetry to make the pattern prettier.

00:14:233 (4,1) - It looks like (1) is hard to see because of the overlap, would it be possible to avoid the overlap?

00:36:851 (2,3,4) - (2,3) doesn't seem to need to use a 1/3 snap, and the skipped rhythm at 00:37:479 - felt quite awkward, so I think it would be nice if you could adjust the rhythm a bit.
00:39:993 (3,4,5) - Here again, it would be nice if you could simplify the rhythm.

01:17:924 (4) - The actual drum rhythm is 1/3 snap, but it's in 1/4, so it's really out of rhythm.

00:07:950 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5) - I think it would be nice to make it a little harder here. 00:02:924 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Compared to here, the song is more intense, but it doesn't have the expression to match.

00:10:463 (1,2,3,4,5) - The rhythm is significantly defocused. I feel like the song is emphasizing the white ticks a bit more on both the piano notes and the drum notes, so I think swapping this 00:10:935 (3,4) - would improve the rhythm.

00:49:416 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 00:54:442 (1,2) - 01:09:364 (5,6,1,2) - 01:14:547 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5) - I think I followed the piano note, but the piano note is a 1/3 snap instead of a 1/4. I think changing the rhythm to 1/3 would make the piano notes more pronounced.

00:05:281 (1,2,3) - Wouldn't it be better to unstack (1,2)? I feel like they sound different, and I don't think stacking them would express that well.

00:37:479 (1,2,3) - I'm not sure what rhythm you're following, maybe you're trying to represent the drum, but maybe doing it in 1/3 would show the drum better?

00:43:291 - There's a drum HS where there's no drum, which looks awkward. Remove it.

01:11:406 (3,4,5) - Did your spacing suddenly become extreme? It's not a sound that's going to be emphasized, so a little less spacing would be nice.

00:11:092 (3,4,5,6) - Since the sound is obviously stronger overall compared to the other sections, you could try increasing the spacing a bit. At least more than 00:09:993 (6,7,8) -.

00:42:192 (1,2,1,2) - The new combo is in, but the combo color is the same color, which is very awkward.

01:22:401 (4,5,6) - Despite the reduced intensity of the song, the intervals feel similar to the kiai segments. 01:20:831 (1,2,3,4) - It would be nice if you could shorten the spacing like this.

01:16:783 (6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - 01:18:891 (5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3) - 01:24:080 (3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2) - Is the rhythm too difficult for the intensity of the song? It seems like a good idea to remove some of the unnecessary rhythms.

00:05:108 (1,2,3,4,1) - 00:21:810 (4,1) - Wouldn't it be better to avoid overlaps? I know it's the beginning, but it's not a weak song, so I don't think it's necessary to overlap.

01:57:972 (2,3,4,5) - It's the same stack, but the rhythm is different, which makes it harder to read. 01:58:621 (4,5) - Wouldn't it be better not to stack?

00:44:027 (1) - All of a sudden, I see a long slider of 3/2, which feels underwhelming. 00:44:189 - I hear a drum sound here too, so why not add a 1/1 slider here?

01:13:378 (3,4,5,6,1) - It's an underused flow, and the circles are too close together, making it very difficult to read. I think you could just avoid the overlap.

00:04:778 (5,6,7,8) - Compared to the previous part, I think the density has suddenly increased, and I think the rhythm could be simpler.

00:28:778 (1,2,3) - Overall, the rhythm follows the vocals, but only here it follows the drums, which I feel breaks the rhythmic focus. I think it would be nice if you could use a rhythm like the one in the photo below so that the rhythm is a little more consistent.

00:47:635 (3,4) - I think it would be nice to use the same rhythm here - 00:54:492 (1,2) - to give the vocals a little more expression, the constant 3/2 rhythm is a little boring too.

00:24:064 (5,6) - I think it would be better if you could swap the rhythm, because the rhythm is following the vocal, but it's just following the drums here, so it feels very out of place.

00:31:135 (6,7) - I think starting 00:31:350 - here would be better for vocals.

00:49:135 - Since there are vocals here too, I think it would be better if there was a circle or slider here.

01:11:850 (2,3) - Considering the vocal, I think it would be better to swap the positions of the two notes, as the sound is weaker at 01:12:278 - than at 01:12:064 -.

01:41:850 (6) - 01:42:492 - This sounds pretty strong, and anything that's not a click feels like a poor choice of expression. 01:42:278 - I think it would be nice to end the slider here and put a circle in the existing spot.

00:15:064 - The stack usage in that section is pretty erratic and confusing. 00:15:064 (1,2,3,4) - Here you used a 1/1 stack, 00:16:778 (1,2,3,4) - And here you used 1/2 stack. I think it can be pretty confusing to have different stack usage in the same rhythm, and I think it looks good to have the same stack.

00:30:492 (1) - Why only here is it a 1/1 slider, I think a 1/2 slider would be better.

00:44:207 - This is all filled with 1/2 rhythms, isn't that too dense for the song? I think it would be nice to add some more 1/1 rhythms to make the rhythm a little simpler.

01:14:850 (6,7,1) - broken stack?

00:10:671 - Can I ask why you didn't express the sound here, even though it's louder than the previous 00:08:850 (2) - 00:09:706 (3) - two spots? I think it would be nice to add a 1/4 slider here.

01:03:707 (3,1) - The flow breaks abruptly in (1), which feels very awkward. Is this a placement mistake? I think it would be better if it looked like the capture below.

00:01:778 (1) - NC mistake?

00:04:671 (7) - 00:06:385 (7) - 01:32:099 (7) - 01:33:813 (7) - I don't think it's the rhythm you need. I don't think you're the type to add a filler rhythm where there is no sound in this map, but it feels very awkward to have a filler rhythm only here.

00:09:921 (8,1) - Wouldn't it be nice to turn it into a slider, just like the front and back?

01:22:564 (4) - I think you could try using stronger spacing for the cymbal sound here.

00:44:723 (4,1) - This type of stacking is not recommended as it can be very confusing for players on Easy difficulty. Unstacking is recommended.

01:08:323 (2,3) - check distance is off?

00:10:323 (3,4) - The strong sound is in the bluetick, why not try a 3/4 reverse like 00:43:923 (5) - ?

00:35:523 (5) - So far, you haven't added any circles to these spots like 00:38:723 - 00:22:723 - , so why just this one? I think it would be better to remove them to match the other rhythms.

00:47:123 (5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 00:59:923 (5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - If you remove the slider tail, it's basically just clicking in time to the beat, which is pretty boring. I'd like to see some variation in the clickable rhythm, like in the example below.

00:57:523 (6) - I think it would be nice to use circles to better represent strong sounds.

01:18:323 (5,6,7) - I don't think you need to use 3 circles all of a sudden, it's not like the sound is that strong. I recommend trying the reverse slider.

00:39:123 (1,2) - Why is the rhythmic density lower than in 00:26:323 (1,2,3,4) - , even though it's more intense? At the very least, I'd like to see it use the same rhythm and not be weaker than the previous section.

00:56:723 (1,2) - Even without vocals, the current rhythmic choices are quite underwhelming, given the intensity of the drums and the overall flow of the song. You could try tweaking the rhythm a bit. I'll include an example below.

01:14:323 (4,6) - I can't see the reverse arrow in (6) because it's obscured by the (4) slider, and I don't think it's a good pattern for the lower difficulty level of Hard, unless it's a higher difficulty level, but I'd like to see the 6th reverse arrow.

01:26:323 (5) - I think it would be better to use two circles or 1/2 slider + circles rather than a slider, as there is definitely a difference in pitch from the previous 01:23:923 (1,2,3,4) -.

00:26:523 - Considering the overall vocalization, it doesn't seem necessary to skip this one.

00:59:923 (1) - Overall, all the vocals are clickable, so I think it would be nice to replace them with two circles.

00:35:636 (6,7) - 00:36:159 - Given the strong sound here, wouldn't a 3/2 rhythm be better?

00:11:741 (1,2,3) - It feels like a monotonous rhythm that doesn't match the tension of the drum. I think it would be good to add some variation to the drums and background sounds to make them sound stronger.

00:50:287 - Why don't you end the spinner here? I think it works a little bit better here because the guitar behind it ends completely and the buildup vocals start here.

00:08:950 (1,2,3,4,5) - 00:10:520 (1,2,3,4) - I'm not sure what the difference is between the two sections. I think it's safe to say that the tune or tension is almost exactly the same, but the rhythm itself doesn't have to be completely different.

00:23:078 (1,2,3,4) - Perhaps you intended to make it a little harder to account for the slightly higher tension than before, but the gap in pattern difficulty from before is too much. I think a little less gap would be fine for the contrast.

01:04:590 (7,1) - In the previous sections, you've been following the vocal rhythm all along, except for some intense sections like 00:50:985 - 01:02:148 -. But you only followed the drums here, which felt awkward, and I think it would be better to follow the vocals like in the previous sections.

01:14:880 (4) - What is the point of this slider? I feel like the slider here is meaningless because neither the vocal nor the drums are strong, so I think you should just replace it with a circle.