01:13:671 - x0,77; 01:13:885 & 01:13:928 - x0,74; 01:13:992 - x0,71. Looks smother and gives a good cut to the next accelerating section.

01:38:956 - Would stop the kiai here because of the intensity ending here. SB does the same.

00:42:679 ~ 00:43:609 - Change the greenlines so notes accelerate with an increment by one (0,75->0,76->0,77->...)

00:43:585 -> 00:43:756; delete 00:43:928 (50) - ? You go mostly by drums, but maybe it is worth following the vocal here.

01:05:356 -> Greenlines: Go down with an increment by one: x1,05 to x1,00 till 01:05:871. Right now it is not smooth.

01:34:842 ~ 01:37:585 - Suggesting one of the changes downbelow or similar. You are consistent from 01:33:471 to 01:34:842 so I recommend following that consistency or switch it in the 2nd suggestion so it alternates a bit nicer and fits better to the drum:

00:09:814 - Have a similar volume to the notes at 00:10:499.

00:53:356 - Would add a don here. Very intense. And you got a bigger break till the kiai anyways.

01:03:642 & 01:04:671 could consider having kats here. It's quite the long sudden break in such intense part. Same at 01:11:699.

01:30:728 change to don I suggest. Alternates better. Feels more engaging.

00:48:447 - Could be deleted to make that SV change not look weird, but I am fine with keeping it if you want since I see the issue here.

01:48:780 - Could delete this note. Prevents this bad overlap, and I think gives a good clear cut to the approaching section. Whether you want to do the same at 01:59:447 or not is up to you. Keeping it wouldn't be a problem tho since it might give a tad more impact.

02:09:947 this part with the finisher is superb.

03:05:947 (1172) & 03:11:280 (1214) - finisher. Your whole finisher concept kinda falls apart for me in this section because it feels quite inconsistent. 03:11:613 and up I understand, but it came so sudden without starting on a full-beat, that having some more finisher before that could help to midigate that problem.

03:13:947 ~ 03:24:530 - Awesome concept with all the oxoox!

00:12:613 & 00:13:947 -

00:13:447 (54,55) - kk, so most of the section is an abekobe to the one at 00:07:447. Could do the same for 00:14:780 (61) - and change to don as well as for 00:15:280 (63,64,65,66) - to kkdd ?

00:16:947 (70,71,72,73) - kkdk I suggest. Seems more fitting to the overall tone. Alternates nicely.

01:37:708 (42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50) - It would be nice if these were the reversed patterns (abekobe) of 01:32:908.

01:03:958 (199) -> 01:04:108? We can leave it if you want. I think this is a reference to the old TNT map where the slider starts at this point.

00:34:842, 00:37:585, 00:40:328, etc. I want to mention just for the protocol again, that I still think these SVs on the single notes look not clean and should be just removed so they become cohesive patterns SV-wise. It is deceptive especially when playing with other mods.

If you don't want to change these, fine by me. Just need an explanation then since this is a BN's insurance.

2051529#3938019/12748278

00:51:642 (81) - Consider changing to d? Starting from 00:49:585 you have a d'n'b rhythm so not following it feels counterintuitive. That's why the d k d suggestion. d d k would be also possible but you might felt bored having it twice in a row.

00:24:899 (43) - D. Would be consistent to your previous finisher usage while the last finishers as kats feels good.

00:35:185 (71) -> 00:35:356 might actually feel more rhythmical. Same for 00:37:928 (79), 00:40:671 (87) and changing 86 to don.

00:54:556 (2) -> 00:54:728 as k? Seems to be more intuitive going with the vocals.

01:04:328 (33,34) - Either move both half a beat earlier or (34) to 01:04:671 to have a consistent rhythm. Current one is too confusing since you change the rhythm basically midway. Or do something you did at 01:11:871 which works much better since it is clear to the melody.

00:17:508 (1) - Good idea with the spinner, but I don't think it fits the bill. Would just go with a kat. Same for the next one.

00:05:673 - Delete this greenline. Wrong SV. Keep it low for now I suggest.

00:32:232 - Understandable but would move to 00:32:370. In this way it is rhytmical consistent.

00:41:453 - Beautiful execution of the upcoming ever changing 5plets. Nice!

00:57:691 (10) - Consider using a D and move 00:56:177 (2) ->00:56:453 + changing 00:56:040 (1) - also as a D. In this way (6) doesn't stay awkwardly alone while the end of this section gets more emphasized. Sure, some cymbals like 00:57:141 are not mapped, but that is due to the 1/4. I think rhythmically it works quite well.

If you feel like this might be too much, (6) could be changed to a normal note then. Works as well.

00:58:242 to around 01:07:049 falls a bit apart in structure but nothing too bad. Just here and there some suggestions I would give to counter that and have some more cohesive patterns if you will:

• 01:01:820 - two suggestions which also do not use the finisher within. Trying to make it consistent to 00:58:517 (2,3,4) since the drop in density is a little sudden:

01:13:654 - Very nice alternation in finishers at the end.

01:18:333 & 01:18:884 add kats? Absolutely fine without. Your idea is clear. Just while playing it felt like it could be filled with these. Same for 01:27:141.

01:32:370 - Maybe I am getting ahead of myself, but try this pattern:

Cursor at 01:32:370 and finishers are highlighted

00:25:489 (7) - Kat? It just alternates nicely when playing and becomes a intertwined pattern as d k k d d k.

00:36:223 - I might be a little to invasive, but how about d k k d k k k instead? Drums are quite prominent and the kats help to emphasize the vocals. I know it isn't 1 to 1 like 00:31:820 for example, but I think it is forgiving considering it is the end of the measurement. If you don't like the long pattern, you can just go for d k k d too. Or

00:40:627 - I think the placement of the trippelts can be improved to fit better to the rest. Try this or something similar:

HL'd notes are the ones I changed

In this way 00:44:480 feels a bit like a reversed pattern.

00:55:214- Try the following pattern. Tried to go with the vocals a bit more. Feels more natural with the tripplet:

01:07:049 (1,2) - could be both finishers so previous finisher doesn't stand alone.

01:10:352 (4,5) - Considering moving one tick earlier as kats to follow with a kkk the vocals?

01:12:003 - Awesome string of patterns. Nicely done with finishers.

00:43:379 - Add a kat is what I recommend because you set with 00:41:177 the expectation to have another note there - consistency reasons.

00:48:333 and 00:49:434 could be deleted to cut the patterns a bit and then you can move d k d at 00:49:985 one half beat backwards as k d k to get at 00:50:535 a bigger break.