mm kpop
probably should change romanised title to I Can Take Off My Panties! both based on 2012066#3783199 and ranked consistency
I Can Take Off My Panties!
Add pantsu nugeru mon to tags too and remove i can take off my panties in tags
pantsu nugeru mon
i can take off my panties
I'll mod map later but meta is fun
we are inters
donkama in 2025
:3
you might want to check that hp/od lol
On the mv the mouth is synced up with the im al ways vocal at 02:13:005 based on that i think -90 is a more accurate video offset
im al ways
-90
meow
This will be the last map i mod for a while.
01:12:308 -> 01:11:610 maybe? similar vocal to 01:10:912 as well as vocal at 01:12:308 being lower in intensity so
01:23:819 - instead of current rhythm what do you think about putting the 3-plet at places with the red tick vocal like 01:24:866
i.e. map 01:25:040 01:26:436 and omit 01:24:343 01:25:738 etc
If applied also similar instances
00:41:785 - map for vocal?
01:01:145 - should just map this, result is 22/1 without break which is more than fine imo and not mapping this is contrary to the map structure here
02:08:122
01:13:529 -> 01:13:878 seems to follow vocals better imo and similar to 01:08:296 being mapped
01:22:947 01:23:296 - think you can map these and omit 01:24:343 01:24:692 for a rest moment there?
g
01:11:174 -> 01:11:523 seems better imo since that way 01:10:564, 01:11:261, 01:11:959 are all kkkdk which represents the repetition in song lyrics nicely
kkkdk
Also plays better imo at the 5* level
01:27:221 01:28:616 - could remove these as you didnt map notes like 02:34:197 etc
optionally 03:18:849 03:20:244 but can keep those up to you
02:17:192 - 02:19:633 - checking if the significant rhythmic differences here compared to 01:10:215 is intentional
why the hell
applied, and i've also adjusted 00:51:086 to also be a mirror - you can reopen if doing that was a bad idea
kinda want to keep the synth methinks
i'm netural either way - both seems fine imo so i'll apply it, the vocal here can be expressed either way here methinks
unfortunately, no
oki lol
i prefer current sv structure i think - tried the one you suggested but it seemed a bit too trol i think
But yeah i like the beeg slider suggestion so will do that
yeah for ones without finisher
for finishers... i think those are more attached to the section after it so i'd rather not have the sv follow the vocal i think
okie
i mapped 01:39:112 so probably want to keep this one ;w;
yesssssssss