1. Advanced (2,07 stars, 123 notes)
2. Hard (3,29 stars, 211 notes)
3. Hyperion's Platter (3,1 stars, 243 notes)
4. Insane (4,47 stars, 279 notes)
5. Normal (1,7 stars, 96 notes)
6. Pati's Shiawase! (5,32 stars, 357 notes)
7. Piku's Rain (3,83 stars, 293 notes)

The21k wrote:

Ok ok, im bad at this but here we go! (fak)

Begginer

1. You can add some variations to the sliders like this. Doesn't fit in lower diffs imo.
2. 00:15:963 (4) and 00:21:610 (4) A reverse slider can do better, because they are good for health (fits better for me) I like it how it is.
3. 00:56:905 (1) That slider can be like this so you can have some cool figure Was actually supposed to be like that.
4. The rest is purrfect, nice job!

Hard

1. 00:24:787 NC? Would ruin consistency.

nice job, im useless again

Happiness!

1. c:

ves mod eber

Happiness

1. 00:08:551 (1,2) - fix blanket
2. 00:12:610 (7) - decrease volume for slider end
3. 00:33:963 (1,4) - ugly overlap x-x
4. 00:34:316 (3,5) - the blanket is slightly off
5. 00:42:610 (2,4) - blanket
6. 00:46:669 (1,3) - they are not exactly the same and because of that 00:47:198 (2,3) - this blanket is very nazi

Hard

1. 00:38:198 (1,2) - fix blanket
2. 00:41:022 (1,2) - ^
   Cant find much here , Nice diff

Thievley's Advanced

1. 00:12:257 (1) - remove nc
2. 00:20:904 (4) - Nc
3. 00:39:257 (3,1) - nazi blanket
4. 00:49:140 (2) - remove one repeat and add circle at big white tick cuz it needs to be clickable

Beginner

1. Rename to easy?
2. 00:02:904 (3,4) - nazi blanket
3. 00:25:492 - add circle, its necessary
4. 00:48:434 (4,5) - the blanket is very very slightly off
5. 00:56:905 (1,2,3,4) - all these blankets are nazi , need fixing

1. Timing seems good, and tags too.
2. Nothing to say about General. ^^

1. Very very very good diff.
2. Hitsounds are perfect, nothing to say.
3. 01:10:669 (4,1) : Here's the only little problem (for me) : Maybe you can put it a bit more on the grid, but it's not critic.

1. There's no hitsounds right ?
2. 00:02:904 (3,4) : What a strange overlap, but it's not critic.
3. 00:10:669 (2,3,4) : Maybe you can put it like this > http://puu.sh/po840/8d1279a652.jpg
4. 00:21:963 : Don't exagerate please.. It's supposed to be an Advanced diff, not a hard, do a triple slider isn't a good idea.
5. 00:48:787 : ^ (But here it's not critic)
6. 01:13:140 : ^
7. I think that's it for Advanced

1. 00:12:610 : You don't need to curve it like this, but it's up to you.
2. Erm that's all for this diff, rest is good.

1. 00:20:022 : Maybe you can do a pattern like the others ? Like 00:18:610 or 00:17:198 ?
2. 00:37:845 : Maybe you can finish the jump by two circles ?
3. 01:02:199 : ^
4. I think that's it.

Imakuri wrote:

Hi ! M4M cause, I sent you a PM in game bla bla bla.
So here's my mod !

[ General]

1. Timing seems good, and tags too.
2. Nothing to say about General. ^^

[ Begginer]

1. Very very very good diff.
2. Hitsounds are perfect, nothing to say.
3. 01:10:669 (4,1) : Here's the only little problem (for me) : Maybe you can put it a bit more on the grid, but it's not critic. If I changed it I'd need to change some more, let alone that isn't a problem at all since it's still in the screen.

[ Hard]

1. 00:12:610 : You don't need to curve it like this, but it's up to you. Changed it but probably not like you wanted it. :p
2. Erm that's all for this diff, rest is good.

[ Happiness!]

1. 00:20:022 : Maybe you can do a pattern like the others ? Like 00:18:610 or 00:17:198 ? There's a special drum I wanna highlight with this kickslider. I asked a lot of players in this skill area and they never had problems reading it.
2. 00:37:845 : Maybe you can finish the jump by two circles ? Wanted to make it "easier" by placing this slider to make the jump part end smoothly.
3. 01:02:199 : ^
4. I think that's it.

Okay, mod mod is now done, I hope i'll help you and good luck for rank !
~ Imakuri

• 
  
  
  Imakuri

  1. There's no hitsounds right ? soon™
  2. 00:02:904 (3,4) : What a strange overlap, but it's not critic. critic? you mean critical, right? i think it's fine though
  3. 00:10:669 (2,3,4) : Maybe you can put it like this > http://puu.sh/po840/8d1279a652.jpg i think it's fine as it is
  4. 00:21:963 : Don't exagerate please.. It's supposed to be an Advanced diff, not a hard, do a triple slider isn't a good idea. given the 1/4 patterns in the hard I think it's fine as a transitional thing, but i do admit it's inconsistent so i'll try to find an alternative, but for now I'll leave it as it is
  5. 00:48:787 : ^ (But here it's not critic) it's fine
  6. 01:13:140 : ^ ^
  7. I think that's it for Advanced
  
  Thanks for the mods!
  
  I'll send you my updated diff through discord when I get the chance Stjpa

Cerulean Veyron wrote:

Hello~ !

[- - Beginner - -]

1. 00:08:022 - & 00:08:375 - I don't really think these two inherited points doing sth for this slider. There aren't any volume or hitsound sliderslide S:C2 change at all. I recommend removing them. Actually all five weren't useful at all. I copied the hitsounding from the last diff to this one so I had less work, and unused green lines are never a real problem but deleting them isn't much work either.
2. 00:26:904 (1) - IMO This is quite too near, I probably prefer you should make the gap a little more bigger to represent distance spacing and rhythm. Since you did a 1.0x on regular verses of the song, how about 0.8x here at least? Should be fine now, I guess.
3. 00:38:198 (1) - Literally the same thing as above. ^
4. 01:15:257 (1,1) - Just my personal opinion; I probably don't like some kind of spinners appearing after a note too early by 1/4, especially when it's the easiest diff on the mapset for beginner players. I suggest rather shortening the spinner, or replace the note for a spinner start. Used the second suggestion.

[- - Hard - -]

1. 00:12:610 (7) - Perhaps adding a clap on the sliders head would make more representative hitsound for the continuous drumming on the music. True, wondering why it isn't there since I copied the hitsounding...probably deleted it by accident. Thanks for noticing.
2. 00:17:022 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - There's no problem with the rhythm or so, but the placements are my concerns. I'm wondering how you'd try to make sth that flows a little awkward... and in my honest opinion, it's weirdly shaped. Maybe moving a few circles of it might do it better, by selecting 00:17:551 (3,4,5,6,7) - and moving them on the bottom left by ten grids may suffice. Around x:35|y:266 at least. Honestly I'm unsure what you meant, but I kinda changed the direction the reversed-slider was looking at. Also, the triplet and the circles afterwards are blanketing (1). Personally I think it's not too bad.
3. - Impressive! Thanks!

I'm just a passer-by for the 1 kd, hehe ;33
Good luck with this map! Thank you. c: I wish you would have modded the Insane too since I have absolutely no idea of how mapping Insanes properly, but since I didn't even ask you to mod it I don't have the right no complain anyway.

Battle wrote:

you should put a link to download w/ anba version tbh I know, just too lazy rn.

[Beginner]
00:15:963 (4,1,2) - Just wondering like, could you make it look neater aesthetically? I mean it's currently fine, but it doesn't feel quite as polished as something like 00:20:551 (2,3,4) - ya know? I can't really tell if it's better now, moved (2) a bit more to the left so it's not as close to (4) as before.
00:21:610 (4,1) - Blanket fix t bh Ok dad!
00:59:728 - It kinda feels weird that this is left unmapped since the intensity of the song is getting greater as it nears the chorus, you may want to choose to undermap instead rather than just not mapping it at all Mapped it normally.

p good diff, kinda feels a bit dull though since the beat is consistent, and you could have added a little bit of variation with things like 00:02:904 (3) - (making it 3/2 repeat slider) but it's fine either way Then I'd have problems with hitsounding properly without switching too slidertickrate2.

[Hard]
00:12:610 (7) - I know that slider ends don't need to be properly snapped to something but like, it kinda feels useless to have a slider here since all the more prominent beats besides her like, breathing or w/e stops on 00:12:610 - lol But she is still extending it until the downbeat. I silenced the slidertail now so it's clearer what the slider is mapped to.
00:29:375 (4,1) - blanket p lS omg

[Insane]
00:12:610 (7) - a As in Hard.
00:15:081 (9) - For these, you may want to stick to a maximum of four repeats, since that's usually the amount players expect for 1/4 repeats like this, plus this allows for more movement instead of feeling like you're stuck there forever (4 1/4 ticks are enough to recover t b h) I spectated a lot of testplayers for this skilllevel and they never had a problem at this part at all. Sure it looks weird, but I mapped it like this for a bit variation and as I said it plays just fine.
00:34:140 (2,3,4) - I personally find it kinda awkward how you choose to do the emphasis of it, since for "mama" the two syllables are equally emphasized, but the spacing between 2 -> 3 is pretty lackluster, you may want to add emphasis to dat weeaboo word xd Fixed I suppose?
00:36:434 (4,5,1) - There are times where stacks work for emphasis, but I highly disagree with this one, since the downbeat is really passive in this case, so having more movement for 4 -> 5 would work really well imo Made a triangle here.

I'm not too fond of the like, ds'd looking style of insanes but this is fine lol Because I dunno how to map Insanes otherwise as I taught everything myself to this point lol. Let alone that I barely ever mapped Insanes with some more DS variation.

Hobbes2 wrote:

r u redy for quality nazi blanket m4m

From your queue ~

[Easy]

00:12:787 (5) - NC? Not needed.

00:22:669 (1,2) - Flow's kinda weird, I suggest moving 2 up slightly and then adjusting the notes after accordingly. That's a normal flow used in easier diffs.

00:25:492 - I think map this and NC, because the drums don't slow down until after this note. Feels weird not to have something to click here. Just put a slider there with a silenced sliderend.

00:36:787 (3) - Unlike above which I think is necessary, this one maybe not so much. I think you map this, but it's probably up to you. Nah. Kinda weird and hard to map in such an Easy diff, let alone that some breaks never hurt anyone.

Nice map! One comment overall is that it felt you had a lot of sliders with the same shape (the curve, sliders like 00:17:022 (1) ) and I think you could generally add some variety to your slider shapes. Other than that, looked like a great map.


[Hard]

00:12:610 (7) - I think this would probably be better as a regular curve instead of a smushed up curve. Thoughts? The curve highlights the high-pitched vocal pretty nice.

Why skip notes like 00:21:081, 00:22:492, and 00:23:904? It's fine in advanced but I think Hard you can just map it. Because this part is extremely difficulty for a Hard diff so I put little breaks there because players in this skilllevel aren't used to triplets spam and need a bit of recovery time.

Couldn't find many problems with this, looked good. Flow was great, the map itself was fun (I enjoy triplets), and the patterns were all good.

[Hapiness]

00:16:492 (7) - Not a fan of this kickslider, the others were all either at the end of the stream (preceding a circle on a downbeat), or at the start of the stream, but this one was in the middle and felt weird. Could just be me, I guess. I like it though and it brings some variation. Can't really remember if it has another purpose tho lol.

00:18:434 (1) - Move to x272 y32, I think this is slightly better placement (now I think its too much to the left) If I'd do that the repeat-slider would be really close to the stream which looks ugly and the look of the blanketing I used there would also suffer.

01:04:316 (2,3) - ctrl+g here, improves the flow I used that flow regularly in this map though, also your suggestions doesn't fit into the scheme I used in this difficulty.

Nice map, had fun patterns.

Good luck, I hope my mod helped ~

-NanoRIPE- wrote:

Hi ~ M4M Request

[Beginner]
how about change the diff name to "Easy" *its looks like not a Beginner diff ~

00:07:140 (1) - finish? * i hear cymbal here Oops.
00:43:492 (4,1) - blanket? It would ruin everything.
00:51:258 (1) - whistle Ok.

[Hard]
00:18:610 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - how about 1/3 repeat slider? like 00:17:198 (2) It's not 1/3 but 3/2 btw. This whole part follows a scheme if you compare the pattern of the first half with the pattern of the second half.
00:36:081 (3) - ctrl j and move to x:312 y:252 I wanted to map this a bit different since I used your suggested pattern previously already. Since the pitch of the vocal goes up I decided to just copy paste the first slider and make a triangle out of it.
01:04:669 (2,3) - blanket? It was barely visible but ok.
00:51:257 (1) - whistle

[Happines]
00:25:669 - add note around here? *follow biola/piano sound ~ A break fits way better here, especially since the streampart is the hardest part of the map so some rest isn't bad.
00:51:258 (1) - whistle
01:12:081 (3) - add finish/clap drum hitsound? Good catch, forgot it on the previous slider too.

GL ~
ans sorry for short mod ;w;

Battle wrote:

o for the repeats thing on insane or w/e, they may play fine but things w/ 4 repeats usually tend to play the smoothest ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

also fix ur preview point pls like all the other ranked versions :/\/\/\/ Mine is way better now. B)

Nekomata wrote:

[Happiness!]
00:15:081 (9) - I can see how the player would want to move a lot more through this streamy part - this repeater may be too long, but it seems to be testing reading skill more over playing by the (tapping) rhythm. Nothing particularly wrong, but do consider alternatives such as 1/4 slider jumps which also fit well here. This goes for all the repeaters in this part of the map. I'd have problems with the spread then I suppose because this part isn't nearly as difficult in Hard and I even gotta nerf it there, so making it even harder with kicksliders would be too much I think, let alone that this streampart is already the hardest part in this difficulty so buffing it doesn't make that much sense imo.
00:28:316 (1,2,3) - 1/2 slider without repeat here isn't a very enjoyable rhythm in most cases IMO. My suggestion - timeline rearrange: http://puu.sh/pubXy.png, new flow (00:29:375 (4) - is ctrl+g): http://puu.sh/puc4B.png
00:31:669 (3,4) - Similar to above, but supporting the vocals with the slider feels a lot better. http://puu.sh/pucds.png
00:34:669 (5,6) - 1/2 circles would better emphasize the rather strong 00:35:375 (1) - 'wa'. Slider jump isn't strong enough, considering leniency as well. Since it's not kiai yet I wanted to keep it calmer and easier so the kiai actually has its meaning.
00:35:904 (2) - Feels out of place relative to the vocal. Consider repeating 00:35:375 (1) - and circle on 00:36:257 - in a possible jump pattern.
00:36:787 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Whistles? (7: on head and tail separately)
00:39:610 (1,2,3,4,5) - Sometimes following the prominent vocal is better: http://puu.sh/pucCm.png
00:42:257 (2) - Music doesn't call for any tapping here, but suggests a tap-hold or a pause at 00:42:081 (1) - . Maybe you just mapped this for 1/2 rhythm but you can create a pause here as well.
00:51:257 (1) - Personal preference, I'd rather remove this and have a delayed break (goes for all diffs?). Otherwise keeping this might as well map through the whole section (that's just what I think anyway).

[Hard]
00:42:257 (4) - Similar to Insane.
00:42:787 (2,3) - Better if this was swapped to emphasize the vocals. http://puu.sh/pueId.png
00:45:787 (2,3) - Maybe try something like this: http://puu.sh/pueNg.png
01:07:316 (2,3) - Probably better off swapped: http://puu.sh/puffH.png
01:09:610 (1) - Multi-syllable vocal, maybe try to match it? The previous 1/1's seemed to match the vocals but they were held vocals. Inconsistent with 00:45:257 (1) - .

[Easy]
00:12:787 (5) - Nothing here that calls for a tap. Try repeating 00:12:081 (4) - instead. Or remove it altogether since it's similar to 00:36:081 (2) - Changed both even tho I'm unsure if the second one is good now.
00:15:963 (4) - IMO, these kinds of sliders in this section should be 1/1 repeats to keep up the 1/1 rhythm if giving a tapping break is your intention with these.

Difficulty spread from Advanced to Hard is most likely unrankable, I suggest increasing difficulty in Advanced and adding a Normal diff (or rename current Advanced to Normal and then create an Advanced lol). Gotta nerf it I guess.

Feb wrote:

stüpfer mappt hanatan o.o

Exa wrote:

Easy:

|00:18:434 (3,4) - Although it's fine, it'd be better if this rhythm was swapped so as to be consistent with 00:15:610 (3,4) - .
| 00:40:669 (4,2) - Stack. It was already stacked.
| 01:10:316 - Seeing that the music gets somewhat intense here, it'd be nice if the player could tap.
| 01:11:022 (1,4) - Stack

Hard:

| 00:11:728 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - While testplaying, the sudden use of constant single-direction flow quickly threw me off. It'd be nice if you could recreate a zig-zag effect with gradually but slowly increasing DS so as to both have a much user-friendly flow and also emphasize the song's increase in intensity. What allows you to gradually increase the DS is the dynamic DS used in the advanced difficulty.
| 00:16:140 (5) - I suggest turning that into another triplet as there currently doesn't seem to be a curtain sequence that you follow when deciding between adding a reverse slider or a triplet. Simply going "Rev.Slider + Rev.Slider --> Triplet + Triplet --> Repeat" would be much more consistent and comfortable to play. This stands for every other instance. I had more variation until yesterday, but I definitely had to nerf this diff as the difficulty was way too high and the spread was really bad because of that. Gotta keep it like this, sorry.
| 00:30:434 (3,2) - It'd be amazing if you could find a way to avoid this overlap. It's very notable while playing and only reduces the aesthetics of this map, given that there has not been a single overlap up until now.
| 00:38:198 (1,2) - Please improve this blanket. A quick check and occasional adjustment to every other blanket in all your difficulties would also be a good idea.
| 00:59:022 (3) - You could move this a bit to the right so that it doesn't overlap with 00:57:963 (4) -
| 01:01:140 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Now that's what I'm talking about!

The rhythm here is also somewhat inconsistent and quite diverse. It's kind of justified by the difficulty of the map as the player is not expected to need to expect what is to come. (what a way to put it). It'd be nice if you could check back to the similar section of the song and try to make the rhythm a bit more consistent, although it's not necessary.

Shiawase!:

| 00:11:728 (2,3,4,5,6) - Although this is sort of a subjective matter, I don't think that the constant and complete circular flow here does a good enough job emphasizing the snappy beats. Honestly, something with a greater angle/ more snappy would be much more fun to play to! Meh, I like it this way.
| 00:16:492 (7) - I highly suggest that you let the player tap on this beat, as it will provide a better sense of rhythm and help them guide themselves with further ease throughout this stream pattern. Thing is, the drum you are following is barely noticeable, so staying true to the actually prominent beats of the song would be the best way to go. Don't skip them like this.
| 00:18:081 (11) - This, for example is an amazing example if how you should do it.
| 00:21:787 (5) - Same goes to this. I could go on with reasons to change it and let the player actually tap on the white tick, but I think what I've said so fat would be more than enough. I am not going to point out every instance this happens as it's very notable, even while playing.
| 00:25:492 (1) - There is no prominent enough beat here, worthy of a tap. If I were in your shoes, I'd leave this blank. Silencing the note does nothing in this case since the player does interact with something that just isn't there.
| 00:41:728 (3,1) - Please make these 2 be of the exact opposite angle, they create a very discomforting flow and look badly oriented.
| 00:46:669 (1,2,3) - Finish what you started, soldier.
| 01:03:610 (5,4) - You could adjust the pattern so that the tails of these sliders stack. The fake overlap that they make is notable as they are not that far apart on the timeline.
| 01:07:316 (2,3) - Ok so you use this kind of flow quite often so I figured I would elaborate on why it's somewhat uncomfortable. As you can see, the flow that (3) proposes is not the same or anywhere near to the flow that you've created before. This is pretty easy to understand, especially with the visualization.
| 01:10:316 (5,1) - If you genuinely try but can't avoid/ get rid of the overlap, at least make it so that the tail of (1) is of equal distance from the head and tail of (5).

Exa wrote:

Thievley's Advanced:
| 00:06:963 (7) - Being right after the easy difficulty, a newbie might not have been accustomed to such rhythms. It's fine since it's just a hold, but it'd be nice if the reverse arrow did not hide under the note. Try moving the reverse slider so that the arrow is clearly visible. Just like 00:22:316 (4) - fair enough
| 00:08:904 (4,5,6,1) - The pattern gets a bit cramped here and a new player might freak out with all the objects appearing together in one place. I agree and I'll try to find some alternative if I can, but I think I will just leave it as is for now
| 00:29:728 (1,1) - This overlap can easily be avoided, it currently reduces the aesthetics of the map, taken that there are already quite a lot of overlaps because of the low DS. changed (1) to a straight slider.
| 00:32:551 (1,1) - Touchy touchy. moved it a little bit apart?
| 00:44:551 (2,3,1,2,3) - The sudden stop - go movement here might confuse some players. I suggest spacing 00:45:610 (2,3) - out since the music/ lyrics do get a bit louder here. I don't think it needs to be spaced more, I think that is already being highlighted by slider (3)
| 00:48:787 (2,3,1) - Really unsure about how this pattern will play. You are really taking a risk and trusting the player's readability too much. There has to be some kind of transition from easy to hard. But I might consider watering down the current pattern for the sake of readability because I'm also a bit iffy about it.
| 00:59:022 (2,2) - Another overlap that can easily be avoided. it barley overlaps... whatever though, it doesn't hurt to change it. removed an anchor and made it a straight slider.
| 01:02:375 (4,1) - I see no point in reducing movement right before the chorus. It doesn't seem like you are going with a slingshot buildup since no movement is gradually reduced up until now. spaced them apart
| 01:05:022 (3) - The player taps on the big white tick at the start of the chorus but for some reason they don't here...
| 01:06:081 (2,3) - Could've stacked. it's already gone dude.
| 01:07:846 (3) - Nor do they tap here. It's really weird while playing to not be able to interact with such prominent beats. These are not the only instances this happens as the prominent beats are often being skipped for the sake of reducing the difficulty by using 1/1 or 1/2 repeat sliders. yeah, I'm going to end up remapping some stuff because of that dw

I think the rhythm choice in this difficulty has a lot of unexploited potential. It's inconsistent throughout the similar sections of the song but most importantly, it might be too much of a jump from the constant 1/1 used in the easy difficulty. What makes this jump even bigger is the low DS, which is unavoidable but significantly reduces readability, as many times there will be more than a few objects on the screen in one place, due to the low AR.
All in all, the settings can be tweaked so that the OD is lower and gives the player a bigger window to react to the many objects that might come up at once.
However this will create an imbalance when it comes to HP drain and OD that might throw some players off.
The best solution here would be the the increase of the overall DS used (which is currently dynamic, so that's that) which will result in the increase of SR but will improve readability. This, of course will require the addition of another NORMAL difficulty to the set. i'll see what i can do.

Easy

1. 00:02:904 (3) - how about a 3/2 reverse slider? Personally I like to put these where they can fit (in this case the match the vocals) as it breaks up the 1/1 beats everywhere. Also ebcause its the beginning which is lot softer the reduced note density feels nicer imo http://puu.sh/pyTrt/0ebe4fde9f.jpg
2. 00:05:728 (3) - if you do the above
3. 00:12:081 (4) - The drums end on the red tick so why not finish on the read tick as well?
4. 00:36:081 (2) - Highly recommend to do this http://puu.sh/pyTJ7/7fdc277aaf.jpg This is very simlar to the above but it just sounds so out of place the extend to the white tick as there isnt a sound there and the music has such an intense hit on the red tick
5. 00:48:787 (5) - I would remove the clap and lower the volume so the hitsound finish isnt too overbearing to the finish in the music
   Personally I would like to see some more 3/2 reverse and 2/1 sliders to match the vocals but to each their own I guess

Advanced

1. 00:04:316 (1) - I think decreasing the angle would be better. Just for the fact it looks nicer
2. 00:45:257 (1,2) - How about turining these into a 1/1 slider. It seems more fitting, it makes it easier and doesnt create a massive bulk in note density in this measure compared to the rest
3. 00:48:787 (2,3,1) - This could be a lot easier to read and make it less clustered visually if you made a few tweakshttp://puu.sh/pyUkI/909cb54c24.jpg
4. some inconsistencies in your NC pattern such as 00:08:904 (4) , 00:41:022 (4) , 00:05:728 (4) . In these cases the NC pattern is once every 2 measures instead of every 1. Though imho I think you should change the entire NC pattern to every 2 measures as some combos are very very short. I saw a combo length of 2 a few times

Hard

1. 00:11:904 (3,1,2,1,2) - is the NC spam here neccessary?
2. 00:51:258 - extend the break time to here like the advanced diff has

Kisses wrote:

Reminder for me to mod

Easy

1. 00:02:904 (3) - how about a 3/2 reverse slider? Personally I like to put these where they can fit (in this case the match the vocals) as it breaks up the 1/1 beats everywhere. Also ebcause its the beginning which is lot softer the reduced note density feels nicer imo http://puu.sh/pyTrt/0ebe4fde9f.jpg It would ruin the hitsounding and I wanna keep the diff as simple as possible. If I changed it here I'd need to adjust it in the whole diff which is kinda weird then, imo.
2. 00:05:728 (3) - if you do the above
3. 00:12:081 (4) - The drums end on the red tick so why not finish on the read tick as well? Emphasis for vocals.
4. 00:36:081 (2) - Highly recommend to do this http://puu.sh/pyTJ7/7fdc277aaf.jpg This is very simlar to the above but it just sounds so out of place the extend to the white tick as there isnt a sound there and the music has such an intense hit on the red tick Aye!
5. 00:48:787 (5) - I would remove the clap and lower the volume so the hitsound finish isnt too overbearing to the finish in the music I don't really find the difference between what I have currently and your suggestion. Maybe I'm just stupid. :v
   Personally I would like to see some more 3/2 reverse and 2/1 sliders to match the vocals but to each their own I guess

Hard

1. 00:11:904 (3,1,2,1,2) - is the NC spam here neccessary? Yes, to make it consistent with the NC spam I have later on. Also, I forgot one NC here. :^)
2. 00:51:258 - extend the break time to here like the advanced diff has If you tell me how to without placing a circle there, sure. >_>

[]

ezek wrote:

You know why I'm here, right? :p

Easy

1. 00:07:845 (2) - You should remove that repeat and use the downbeat for another slider or a circle, and I don't say it just because it is a downbeat; the sound there is very important and it should be more emphasized, you know? I actually never realized that the tail is on a downbeat, otherwise I'd have changed it myself lol. Thanks for noticing!
2. 00:25:140 (4) - oh! Design idea! What if you use the same position as the slider that was before the previous slider, like this, it's a nice repetition effect, don't you think? \:D/ True.
3. 00:29:728 (1,2) - Sorry for telling you this, but I can't resist to tell you that you can still improve this blanket :v ;_;
4. 00:36:434 (3) - I think the pattern would look more neat if you stack this note with 00:35:022 (4) - somehow~ Done.

Hard

1. 00:12:610 (2) - This slider looks too squished compared to the other ones, you may wanna expand it a little, at least like this so the map looks more visually consistent~ Yeah but this slider is intended to emphasize the weird sound she makes. I rotated the slider a little to make it look a bit better.
2. 00:41:022 (1,2) - Sorry again. ;__;
3. 01:03:081 (2) - Look at that spacing~ Derp.png

Shiawase!

1. 00:42:081 (1) - Is this NC intentional? Yes. The spacing here changes before a new downbeat appeared, so I wanted to highlight it this way.

That's all I could find~

I hope this is good enough for you, good luck! ^^

Xilver wrote:

yo o/ m4m from my queue

[Shiawase!]

00:08:904 (2,3,4) - i'd move this a bit more down from 1 considering you increased the spacing on 00:08:198 (5,6,1) - Yup.
00:12:610 (7) - you could try and curve it to where 6 was going https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5446168 To make it more predictable? True.
00:20:904 (10) - you could curve this a little bit better http://puu.sh/pBCii/da8bd45a12.jpg The shape has the direction from where the stream would keep moving if there actually wasn't this slider, so I'm gonna keep it (also the difference is barely noticable :p)
00:25:492 - maybe add note here? I used to have something there, but since it's not really audible it's more like a bad idea. Same reason why I don't have a circle after the 1/3 sliders at the end.
00:28:845 (3) - i'd rotate this 14 in the selection center to fit the movement with 2, you could always reapply the blanket to 4 if you're going to do it :p Ok dad.
00:35:375 (1) - spacing kinda wonks here, i'd move this down and then blanket with 2 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5446193 I like the flow how it is atm and also I'm using exactly 2.0x DS for every downbeat so the flow / spacing consistency would be screwed up a little if I don't change it anywhere else too.
00:36:787 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - from a design standpoint i think these jumps are kinda counterintuitive, for 1-4 you can hear how the notes are going down the scale so i'd gradually reduce spacing for these, and for 5-7 you hear how it goes up the scale again so i'd gradually increase it You are right but in the whole diff I'm emphasizing faster vocals with jumps. Using anti-jumps here would be really meh to play. That's why I'm using lower DS for the jumps here, to at least make it not hard as the other faster vocal jumps that have drums on it.
00:42:081 (1) - just me but i'd increase SV here a little bit to emphasize the "yes" sound thingy That would be kinda unpredictable considering that there's no part anymore where I could to the same and the jump here comes out of a sudden anyway, so I dislike buffing it.
00:48:787 (1) - consider ncing these since they're a change to 1/3 Aye.
01:13:140 (4) - same for these

[Hard]

00:45:787 (2) - would change this into a note and slider to be consistent with 00:34:492 (2,3) - The difference there is that both sliders are more oriented to the vocals and actually emphasize them while the other one is simply mapped to the drums (or at least more focused on them).
00:48:787 (5) - again would ncs these personally Changed.
01:09:610 (1,2) - same as 00:45:787 (2) - but if you like that pattern then i'd just change 00:34:492 (2,3) - to 2 repeat sliders
01:13:140 (3) - same as 00:48:787 (5) -

Nice diff!

[Thievley's Advanced]

Why is your preview point different than all the other diffs? She never updates the diff when I change it after using her changes after mods. ;_;

[Easy]

00:17:728 (2) - you could blanket this with 1 a little bit better Ok.

Good diff!

good luck with your mapset c:

Nekomata wrote:

(ノ･ω･)ノ

Lasse wrote:

https://osu.ppy.sh/s/431010

[general]
drum-hitfinish2 is way louder on the right channel and pretty quiet overall
lots of silence after most hitsound files wating a good amount of space
this should fix everything: http://puu.sh/pFtVy/52ad157709.zip
other stuff seems fine ty fam

[hitsounding]
00:11:375 - 00:12:610 - would work well with gradually increasing hitsound volume to match the song volume //same for 01:01:140 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -
00:36:787 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - where are the hitsounds ;_; at least some soft whistles
01:11:022 (1,2,3,4) - might want some finished or sth for this part I like it how it is.
01:19:493 - whistle on spinnerend for piano would fit

[i]
00:06:434 (4,5,6) - ew pretty linear speedup ; \ some more acute angle here would be nice, like putting 00:06:963 (6) - on 00:06:081 (2) - or sth that keeps the structure
00:08:198 (5) - if this gets a jump 00:07:845 (3) - should too, it's liek the same thing Except that there isn't a drum sound. :p
00:09:434 (5,6,7) - would reduce spacing for the triple so you get a nice increasing thing on 00:09:169 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - which fits the song nicely here. or put equal spacing on all 3
00:09:963 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - why not immediately start with a square? looks much more organized http://i.imgur.com/6yVY6aH.jpg
00:20:022 (2,3) - mapping it like this once is kinda weird since it's just a triple/rep.slider all other times. if you want variation at least do it more often/consistently The drum hit here is way louder than all the others which is why I put a kickslider here.
00:42:081 (1) - some for of sv change/unique shape or anything to emphasize the vocal (which seems to be your idea here judging from the nc) better would be good here
00:44:904 (5,6,2,4) - generally for overlap patterns like thise actually having them overlap the same amount, maybe even the same angle/mirrored makes for much cleaner visuals
01:07:846 (4,5,6,1) - more acute angle would make this speedup play much better
01:10:669 (6) - no jump for this finish ;_; Because I'm still following vocals. The finish hitsounds are just there because there are some in the music.

so many spots like 00:42:963 (4,5) - where you could actually use the outer parts of the playfield afterwards but it seems to always transition back to the middle which makes feel really center heavy : \

[h]
00:10:845 (5) - might actually want to fix spacing here cause it makes 5 get a followpoint unlike the others which looks weird lol
also fixing some other patterns where autostacking throws off your even spacing by a noticeable amount, like for example 00:15:610 (1,2,3,4,5) - would be great
http://i.imgur.com/sH2wZpC.jpg like the main reason ds is used is for nice even visuals, nobody is going to misread a pattern cause of a sudden 0.2x change, but if not even the visual thing is given then gg ds
00:11:728 (1) - doesnt need nc spam, you didnt even do that on insane and it doesnt really fit patterning or music // 01:01:140 (1) -
01:10:140 (2) - rip any for of emphasis, suddenly shifting to this which even puts cymbal on a repeat ;c As in Insane.
besides the visuals being killed by distance snapped stacks this seems mostly fine

[e]
00:35:022 (4,2) - why not just sth like http://i.imgur.com/BuVbwVj.jpg for bit better readability instead of suddenly having 00:36:434 (3) - pop up under the hitburst
01:09:610 (3,4,1) - really easy to misread for beginners, movement on 3 leads more towards 01:11:022 (1) - which also appears way before you have to hit 01:10:669 (4) - try sth like http://i.imgur.com/H8PyOqi.jpg ?
01:15:257 (1) - i'd start this later to let people actually click that last strong sound What? D:

gl

01:15:257 (1) - i'd start this later to let people actually click that last strong sound What? D:

Come[Back]Home wrote:

M4M from your queue

general
Check AiMod please, preview time isnt the same in every diff

Easy

00:22:669 (1) - This one is too high and touches the hp bar which is unrankable. Same here 00:24:081 (3) - Fixed from previous mod already. Also, touching HP bar is not unrankable. :p
00:45:257 (3) - and here 01:08:905 (2,4,1) -
00:59:728 (1) - This needs an NC for consistency since this one has a NC aswell 00:12:787 (5) - Probably fixed in the last mod too? Idk, at least it was correct here.

Hard

00:12:257 (2,2) - I think a blank would make the whole pattern look better I wish people would read the previous mods. :<
00:59:375 (4,1) - Those are too high and touching the hp bar. Same here 01:05:375 (1) -

Insane

00:12:434 (6) - How about moving this one somewhere around 246/216 for a square jump, it fits with the music. Completely rearranged them because the flow was awkward.
00:34:492 (4) - I would move this one too 339/353, so it will go better with the movements from the circles before. Aye.
00:36:610 (4,1) - I think the jump after (1) would be better to play if the spacing between (4,1) would be the same as before. True.
01:01:140 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Those jumps look really messy to me, like they were placed randomly without a second thought, may be just me though. I think there are many better patterns to use than this. The first for circles are completely for the drums since the vocals are barely audible, which is why I'm just spacing them out little more rather than going a different direction. And after 4 I kinda break the flow with direction changes that are mapped to the vocals.
01:05:375 (1,2) - Wrong spacing here, should be the same as here 01:05:728 (2,3,4,5) - Oops.


Cool mapset~ Good Luck!

Lasse wrote:

01:15:257 (1) - i'd start this later to let people actually click that last strong sound What? D:

basically means "add a circle here and start spinner some ticks later" lol Used to have that, but it's kinda unpredictable imo.

1. 00:09:787 (2,3,1) - I dont really like the spacing of those. it seems to be the only time where they are spaced like this so maybe go for the same as 00:06:963 (6,7,1) -
   
2. 00:42:434 (1) - nc not necessarily because of sv change but more so that the faster sv on 00:42:081 (1) - will be more clear so its easier to sightread

1. 00:14:904 (7) - shortening this slider by 2 ticks like u did with this one 00:16:316 (5) - so the player has to start to stream at the strong beat again feels alot smoother and consistent (I have seen u already rejected that idea, but I will still mention it because I think it does play weird how you have it right now)
   
2. 00:19:140 (5) - ^
   
3. 00:48:610 (3,4,1) - this angle looks kinda weird, make it straight so it flows better into the edged slider
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:49:492 (1) - maybe space it in line and with the same spacing as the other 2 sliders
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:11:728 (3) - making this into a 1/2 slider + circle for better emphasize on the the vocal?

1. 00:25:316 (7,8) - 2 circles? would feel better being able to click the last note before the break
   
2. 01:10:140 (2) - im not sure with what the second repeat slider is supposed to go here, a circle + slider would play more with the song and wont ignore the strong cymbal sound

Vell wrote:

[Insane]

1. 00:14:904 (7) - shortening this slider by 2 ticks like u did with this one 00:16:316 (5) - so the player has to start to stream at the strong beat again feels alot smoother and consistent (I have seen u already rejected that idea, but I will still mention it because I think it does play weird how you have it right now) I changed the first one but kept the second one due the special melody and to emphasize the kickslider a little bit harder.
   
2. 00:48:610 (3,4,1) - this angle looks kinda weird, make it straight so it flows better into the edged slider
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:49:492 (1) - maybe space it in line and with the same spacing as the other 2 sliders I honestly don't understand this point, you gotta explain it to me ;_;
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:11:728 (3) - making this into a 1/2 slider + circle for better emphasize on the the vocal? I'm going for the full word rather than that syllable. I want the ending to be smooth.

[Hard]

1. 00:25:316 (7,8) - 2 circles? would feel better being able to click the last note before the break I'd agree with it if the downbeat here was clickable, but this way the slider is mapped to the drums. I silenced the sliderend for the reason I mentioned.
   
2. 01:10:140 (2) - im not sure with what the second repeat slider is supposed to go here, a circle + slider would play more with the song and wont ignore the strong cymbal sound

Sorry, couldnt find anything in Easy and Advanced.

_IxApplePie_ wrote:

Hi! M4M from your queue.

my map -> https://osu.ppy.sh/s/479175

Insane

1. 00:36:787 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - if you're following the music then maybe lesser distance as there's no heavy beat to emphasis Vocals are getting stronger.
2. 00:41:551 (2) - ee, don't so close to 00:41:728 (3), futher a bit. Actually there's no way to solve it properly, but I moved the circle away (and basically broke the DS consistency here, but little inconsistencies like here aren't noticable).
3. 00:47:375 (3) - ctrl g? so that you can flow downwards to 00:47:904 (4,1) Doesn't fit into my spacing concept.
4. 00:49:140 (2,1) - suggestion for the orange (1) Wanna keep the triangle.
5. 01:02:199 (7,1) - blanket or nay?
6. 01:13:846 - note? since your previous kiai has it. (Your normal is until here though) First kiai has it because there's a sound unlike here. In Easy diff I even silenced the sliderend since there's nothing audible on it.

Hard

1. 01:13:846 - note? As in Insane.

Normal

1. Nazi blanket for this, soz! I only catch the obvious ones,
2. 00:10:669 (2,3,4)
3. 00:27:610 (2,3)
4. 00:48:434 (4,5)
5. 01:03:963 (3,4)

Sorry for the nazi blanket in Normal!!

Hoped the mod helps!

GL~

1. 00:09:257 (5) - yehj a consider to make it flat, knda racist of me but actually against of curves which intended but dont make a perfect circular flow
2. 00:12:081 (4) - mayb remove the reverse and extend the slider to 00:12:610 - it will be fine tbh since it doesnt really add too much difficulty and it will represent the rhythm more accurately
3. 00:25:140 (4,1) - so prob here is that the distance-time concept is messed up here, you should increase the distance in between. suggestion https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5650666
4. 00:43:845 (1,2) - pro tip ways to lengthen mods include providing tons of suggestions an d URL's https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5650695 sodium hydride its just i cnt stand two sliders with same orientations but not similar appearing at the same time yea

1. could have named as normal. it does fit the difficulty gap between ez and hard + it is within the sr range
2. 00:06:963 (4) - it brings the negative effect here since it is the odd one out + emphasizing the vocals is actually complete and precise enough. consider to change the note placement in 00:06:787 (3,4,1,2) - into https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5650772 (view the timeline bar)
3. 00:41:022 (4) - missed nc

1. 00:12:610 (7) - circle is ald ok since for the current one slider end doesnt end in any music notes. same case in insane
2. 00:45:257 (1,2,3) - yah im racist and also the rhythm doesnt quite fit imo since 00:45:963 - shouldnt be emphasized much idk. suggestion https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5650833
3. 01:08:199 (1,2,3) - actually just want to fix between 01:07:493 (3) - and 01:08:199 (1) - but yeah https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5650868 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5650882

1. 00:02:728 (6) - consider move to the left side of (5) which is around x:12 since imo it provides a funner flow as of 01:06:787 (1,2,3,4) - . same suggestion goes to 00:43:668 (7) -
2. 00:42:434 (2) - consider nc since sv change + new bar
3. 01:13:846 (1,1) - both move to centre seem better