1. Advanced (2.71 stars, 210 notes)
2. deetz' Normal (1.95 stars, 123 notes)
3. Hard (3.44 stars, 271 notes)
4. Skyloft (5.46 stars, 386 notes)
5. Smoothie World's Insane (4.65 stars, 329 notes)

VINXIS wrote:

i love anime

1. 00:17:245 (3) - hello nazi blanket mod, just move the end point a little to the right to fix
2. 00:18:549 (1) - lol idk why this jumped out to me but it did, idk it looks prettier to me when it makes a triangle xd
   x 261 y 38
3. 00:20:506 (5,6,7,8,1) - isnt this 1/3?
4. 00:22:136 (4) - ok pls no kill for this but im going to say it can you like make this a slider pls that hits the drum xd idk it triggers me
5. 00:50:506 (4) - ok going with emphasized piano notes soft whistles go on 00:50:343 (3) - 00:50:832 (5) - and slider end of 00:51:158 (1) - not 00:50:506 (4) - or 00:51:484 (2) -
6. 01:02:897 (1) - i feel adding a soft cymbal crash here would sound good like this one http://puu.sh/p2ZgP/ee3158e626.wav
7. 01:05:180 (1,2,3,4,1) - maybe have this blanket 01:05:669 (2) - idk
8. 01:06:647 (1) - remove nc here because not much emphasis on this note and its still part of the past sequence and
9. 01:06:973 (2) - place nc here to heighten the emphasis
10. 01:17:897 (4,5,6,7,1) - already looks enough like a star to me to want to make it a star, idk up to you
11. 01:31:593 (1) - i feel if you blanket this in 01:28:984 (1) - it would look prty cute

Aeril wrote:

memes

1. 00:17:245 (3) - hello nazi blanket mod, just move the end point a little to the right to fix done
2. 00:18:549 (1) - lol idk why this jumped out to me but it did, idk it looks prettier to me when it makes a triangle xd sure thing
   x 261 y 38
3. 00:20:506 (5,6,7,8,1) - isnt this 1/3? OOPS
4. 00:22:136 (4) - ok pls no kill for this but im going to say it can you like make this a slider pls that hits the drum xd idk it triggers me i understand your point but i took the beginning rhythm map from the map on deemo, the idea was to start with the piano and then gradually add instruments as the song goes on
5. 00:50:506 (4) - ok going with emphasized piano notes soft whistles go on 00:50:343 (3) - 00:50:832 (5) - and slider end of 00:51:158 (1) - not 00:50:506 (4) - or 00:51:484 (2) - wasn't the intention to emphasize piano sounds but i did change stuff a bit
6. 01:02:897 (1) - i feel adding a soft cymbal crash here would sound good like this one http://puu.sh/p2ZgP/ee3158e626.wav okie
7. 01:05:180 (1,2,3,4,1) - maybe have this blanket 01:05:669 (2) - idk moved it a little bit but idm not having it as blanket
   
8. 01:06:647 (1) - remove nc here because not much emphasis on this note and its still part of the past sequence and
9. 01:06:973 (2) - place nc here to heighten the emphasis okie
10. 01:17:897 (4,5,6,7,1) - already looks enough like a star to me to want to make it a star, idk up to you okie
11. 01:31:593 (1) - i feel if you blanket this in 01:28:984 (1) - it would look prty cute

did it for now, will see what feedback says because the spacing gets rekt if i blanket it

yep shit mod

Lince Cosmico wrote:

Random mod o.o

General:
• Combo colours? thanks for reminding me haha, will take care of that
• idk if this is necesary, but

should add "gin" "kiha" to tags? okie
https://soundcloud.com/ginkiha
also, source is "BMS" ups

Skyloft:
00:20:506 (1,1,1) - wait wtf? listen to the flute synth, it's 1/3, i changed it a bit though
00:21:158 (1,2,3,4) - DS Consistency this was done on purpose, the effect was to gradually decrease DS
00:23:767 (1,2,3,4) - same same
00:44:636 (1) - slider starts here, not here 00:44:799 (2) - im confused :s this was more of a rhythm choice than an objective slider placement
00:47:245 (1,2) - same same
00:51:810 (1,1,1,1) - remove nc? this was to emphasize the
00:52:299 (1,1) - if you do this, at least divide it with same difference on distance snap. Example: 00:51:973 (1) - 1x . 00:52:136 (1) - 1.2x . 00:52:299 (1) - 1.4x . 00:52:462 (1) - 1.6x distance snap (tell me if you dont understand, im not good at expressing myself XD) Made the distance snap more consistent

I recommend you do something like this: 00:51:810 (1) - x:276 y:178 / 00:51:973 (1) - x:304 y:104 / 00:52:136 (1) - x:392 y:80 / 00:52:299 (1) - x:472 y:152 / 00:52:462 (1) - x:424 y:264
also with that, a blanket here: 00:52:299 (1,1) - would fit. Ex: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5255005 / http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5255010

01:28:984 (1,1) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5255024 nazi blanket :v) my blankets always suck orz

Aeril is better modder than me :v

Lol i started doing this as a metadata check xD

xXChiLLkr0EteXx wrote:

General:
- Both beatmaps are really good!

Some suggestions:

- 00,22,462 add a slider till 00.23.115 and delete the circle at the same spot.
- 00,27,680 add a slider till 00.28.332 and delete the circle at the same spot.
- 00,32,897 add a slider till 00,33,549 and delete the circle at the same spot.
- 00,38,115 add a slider till 00,38,767 and delete the circle at the same spot.

This are just suggestions

Kui wrote:

Short mod.

[*]
General
You should work on trying to use the whole play field. true :p the song's intensity didn't call out for much spacing changes so i didn't go too far with it, which probably resulted in not mapping the edges
Check AiMod. ( 01:02:082 - ) woops



Skyloft
00:41:375 (3,4,5,6,1) - I would make this a star. Already almost is one and would look nicer if you did. okie
00:51:810 (1,1,1,1) - You could make this look a little nicer. Make each one the same distance from the end of 00:52:462 (1) - . Plus the notes in the song are getting lower on the scale, so you shouldn't have the circles increasing in spacing. Tried to make it nicer, I didn't reverse the spacing however because the emphasis was on the increasing volume, not the notes on the scale :p
01:23:441 - ^ Notes are going down on the scale so the spacing should start big then get smaller. You could ctrl+g then ctrl+j. made a different pattern that kinda decreases in spacing so hopefully that's fine

Kibbleru wrote:

a vry opinionated mod

00:20:506 (1,1,1) - try dis? done

SPOILER

00:25:071 (1,2) - i thinks this is just normal 1/2.. what is this snapped to currently lol? snapped to the flute synth, drum is ignored for this section cuz the effect was to gradually add instruments as the song goes on
00:35:506 (1,2) - ^ ^
00:41:375 (3,4) - why dont u ctrl g this so that 00:41:375 (3,4) - still follows that kind of curved flow u had from 00:39:419 (1,2,3,4) - changed the star to make it fit the curve more, i made it too spaced when i changed it from another mod
00:05:506 - imo in this general section, as well as 01:39:419 - ur SV is a bit too fast compared to the spacing. for example. look at ur average 1/1 spacing 00:09:419 (3,4) - and look at how long ur 1/1 sliders are lol 00:15:941 (1) - just looks out of place to me. i think.. or maybe its cuz im used to having my spacing much larger compared to SV.. I kinda like them when theyre fast like that, imo it adds that emphasis to the increasing piano pitch :p if it gets too many complaints ill slow it down

1. check aimod apparently some issues with the tags

1. hitsounds are very (too) quiet at the beginning, especially for 00:42:028 - and on, which is a very dense part objects-wise and more intense, yet we can't get much feedback while playing it
   Also the change of hitsounds at 00:52:952 - is way too sudden and contrasts too much with the previous part
2. 00:17:245 (3,4) - why not make a blanket with those two?
3. 00:52:952 (2) - would look better with a slight angle like the others
4. 01:26:375 (1) - just a suggestion but i think this would look better with the center part bent a bit:
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:55:723 (1) - maybe just a bit too loud, the custom hitsound is fine, but the hitnormal sounds out of place, you should rename soft-hitwhistle6 to soft-hitnormal6, then remove the whistle on this circle
   Also maybe edit the hitsound itself to add some reverb/delay for a more impactful sound

1. 00:21:158 (1,2,3,4) - i'd recommend to not let those overlap or make the overlap more obvious, at this point it does not affect gameplay in any way but it'll look way better
2. 00:23:767 (1,2,3,4) - ^
3. 00:31:593 (1,2,3,4) - ^
4. 00:34:202 (1,2,3,4) - ^
5. 00:49:038 (2,1) - overlap
6. 01:02:897 - you forgot kiai on this diff xd
7. same thing about the hitsounds

1. 00:21:158 (1,2,3,4) - i understand your intention, but you shouldn't use more than one DS in Normal diffs
   This is to help beginners understand the time - distance relation in object placement and to help them read the map more easily
2. 00:23:767 (1,2,3,4) - ^
3. 00:36:810 (1,2,3,4) - ^
4. 00:39:419 (1,2,3,4) - ^
5. 00:42:028 - you should make this beat clickable to emphasize it, a 1/2 pause is largely acceptable for a Normal diff, so no worries about that
6. 01:02:897 - ^
7. 01:08:115 - ^
8. 01:13:332 - ^
9. 01:13:984 (1,4) - overlap
10. 01:18:549 - like earlier
11. 01:37:788 (2,3) - i wouldn't recommend stacking non successive circles, as it is often confusing for beginners
12. no kiai either? also recheck the hitsounds here as well

1. 00:13:332 (1) - why is it drums
2. 00:23:767 (1) - bend it the other way? idk
3. 00:28:984 (1) - same
4. 00:36:810 (1,1) - stacking non successive objects in easy may be confusing for beginners so prolly not a good idea
5. no kiai? also check Skyloft diff mod for hitsounding

09kami wrote:

M4M for u q

[General]

hummm...i think soft-hitwhistle need swap this
http://puu.sh/pFeLs/fd890e00a8.wav

Here are some Beautiful voice .maybe u can use it.
http://puu.sh/pFeS1/47191bee29.rar

add new redline

00:21:176 - 184
21176,326.086956521739,4,2,0,100,1,0
00:42:028 - 184
42028,326.086956521739,4,2,0,100,1,0
01:02:938 - 184
62938,326.086956521739,4,2,0,100,1,0
01:34:202 - 184
94202,326.086956521739,4,2,0,100,1,0

http://puu.sh/pFfBQ/6c837536b1.png
http://puu.sh/pFfNX/30a7019158.png
http://puu.sh/pFg3h/9643a2e7b4.png
http://puu.sh/pFgfk/905f8262a8.png

[Skyloft]

00:00:289 - unrankble line sample unified


00:30:288 (1) - Don't you think it's strange here? about red line . mabey u need 445 check up

00:25:071 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - modified for this? The distance of each slide bar is 45°
http://puu.sh/pTB2Q/b1f51b30fd.jpg

00:27:680 - add circle. why ignore this voice?

01:55:723 (1) - I think it should be down volume . mabey 15% good

[Normal]

00:42:028 (1,1) - revise 1/2 reverse slider

00:44:636 (1,2) - 00:47:244 (1,2) - ↑

01:06:810 (3,4,5,6) - check aimod√

[Hard]

I think the gap between NM and HD is too big. 2.1-3.44 gap too bad .mabey u need revise hard cs. cs-0.3 or -0.5

00:57:272 - add note or 00:57:027 (4) - revise 2 1/4slider

00:59:881 - ↑

01:03:386 (2,3,4) - fixed DS

ktgster wrote:

Note: Everything written here is about what the current state of this map is at the moment.
Note 2: It would also be greatly appreciated if you responded to this mod.

General

[General]

AIMod considers your tags conflicted with each difficulty. Make them consistent across all difficulties. done

Spread:

Currently as it is, there is very little difference between Easy and Normal and as a result, screws up the spread by having a difficulty spike later on in the spread. blame deetz :/ hopefully the addition of more rhythm in normal will be enough difference, i'll buff the normal more if it gets more complaints.

Easy: Fine
Normal: Basically it is easy but higher spacing. This needs more 1/2's to differentiate it from Easy more and help the spread into hard.
Hard: Currently too easy compared to Skyloft. You could replace some reverse sliders with triples and add a few more jumps between NC's to help with the difficulty gap from Hard to Skyloft or add a light insane. There's gonna be a light insane coming from SW and me (collab) very soon

Skyloft: Currently too hard compared to the rest of the spread. Attempt to nerf, buff the others with suggestions above, or add a light insane.

The difficulty mods below will only go through the map in its current state. Read this before you make additional changes.

Skyloft

[Skyloft]

Zelda 2015 c:

00:20:506 (1,1) - Rhythm is just a 1/2 with a 1/4 triple on top. This is a cause for DQing so please change it http://puu.sh/pEHPJ.jpg
welp, i missed that. changed

1/8 Overmapped Sliders:

The usage in 1/8 sliders isn't very well done nor does it fit and seems that it was tacked on for some reason and is not a technique to use due to how frustrating it can be to play not to mention, it's also overmapped.

01:05:343 (3,4) - the 1/8 on slider 3 doesn't even exist and slider 4 only hinges on a hold so making these 1/8's and not 1/4's is already unnecessary to begin with. Similar sections include:
- 01:10:560 (3,4) -
- 01:15:778 (3,4) -
- 01:20:995 (3,4) -

There are also alternatives such as mapping slider 3 to a circle instead and only have slider 4 be a 1/8 slider instead, but considering that you could call the strings of 5-note streams overmapped due to how hard it is to hear the notes, it's kind of pointless to go with the 1/8's then. You're right, i got rid of the 1/8th on 3 but i'm keeping it on 4. I disagree with the fact that 5 bursts are overmapped. The idea was that the song gradually increases in intensity so the point was to add more defined rhythm in the intense part of the song. I'm sure this is pretty subjective considering how hard it is to hear the beats in the song, and i think it follows a rather structured rhythm so i'm gonna keep the 5s.

NC Spam:

NC spam is one thing that is unnecessary done and does not add anything to the map, but only inflate the drain. I really don't think HP drain is that much of a problem for a map like this, it if was a map that's really dependent on NC spam to pass (like extreme fantasy hr for example) then i would not use it. I got rid of some NC spams, but I'm keeping some as well. There are some themes I put in the map which are reliant on NC spams

00:51:810 (1,1,1) - Considering how the map emphasizes the song with spacing, the NCing shouldn't even matter. Got rid of this one here Similar areas include:
- 01:01:593 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - Inconsistent with above now got rid of this one
- 01:12:028 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - ^ got rid of this one
- 01:22:462 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - ^ removed NC on the first one but I'm keeping this one.

Random NC's just look random and you're better off making them regular notes of new combo's instead of just NCing every note. Disagree but this isn't the time to argue here :p

Other things:

00:22:462 - it doesn't really make sense that you would ignore this particular note being played here. You follow every part of the main melody and along with that, the beat it follows so not mapping a circle here sounds completely off to what your intentions were. Other parts include:
- 00:27:680
- 00:32:897
- 00:38:115

My intentions were to map to the piano and the flute synth for this part. The idea was to gradually increase the number of instruments I am focusing on as the map goes on. This rhythm was taken from the Deemo chart (https://youtu.be/tn3wJ-l-g7Y?t=35) in which only the piano was mapped for this section. I thought it was fitting so I made it gradually add more instruments. (i did make sure to to map to the flute synth as well since it feels kind of empty with only the piano) I updated the map with added bookmarks so you can the timestamps in where i decided to add more instruments.

00:30:288 (1,2,3,4) - the pattern overall is smaller than the previous one (00:30:288 (1,2,3,4) - ) despite the song going a bit more stronger in the area. You can swap the two patterns in the timeline instead to fix this. So...
- 00:28:984 (1,2,3,4) - starts 00:30:288 -
- 00:30:288 (1,2,3,4) - starts 00:28:984 (1) - done


00:41:375 (3,4) - the spacing here is a bit surprising. The reason being is that it is basically the same distance as 00:41:049 (2,3) - and it shapes more like an pentagon much similar to what you have done before. Either NC or change the pattern so the player can separate the 1/1's and 1/2's
moved one note back to it's easier to differentiate
01:23:278 (1,1) - It's a questionable jump. The angle that it creates is a bit too much and the distance can be an issue compared to the whole map. If you made 01:23:604 (1) - more to left or right. It would be better for the player to hit the notes better. moved it to the right
01:34:202 (1,2,3,4,1) - I find it strange you don't do any spacing tricks for your emphasis here despite doing it everywhere else. Why? if you look at the beginning where the same piano note was mapped, i kept spacing the same. 00:00:289 (1,2,3,4,1) -
01:36:810 (1,2,3,4,1) - ^ same
01:38:766 (2,3) - a bit too big compared to what the song is suggesting nerfed, also reduced SV to 0.5

It's a nice designed map, but there are just some things that just detract from the map as a whole and make it less enjoyable due to those. I also feel the flow could use some more improvement and some things could be better designed.

Hard

[Hard]

00:20:506 (1,1) - Rhythm is just a 1/2 with a 1/4 triple on top. This is a cause for DQing so please change it http://puu.sh/pEHPJ.jpg
done

Spacing:

There is a section (00:42:028 - 01:02:897 ) which has a lower spacing than usual for some reason and compare to the overall section, it does not make sense as to why it is the way it is.
- 00:42:028 (1,2,3) -
- 00:43:332 (1,2,3) -
- 00:44:636 (1,2,3) -
- 00:47:245 (1,2,3) -
- 00:52:462 (1,2,3) -
- 00:55:071 (1,2,3) -
- 00:57:680 (1,2,3) -
- 01:00:288 (1,2,3) -

They would feel more appropriate if they were spaced to around 1.40x or so. True, changed.

Other things:

00:01:593 (1) - considering that it is a calm part. It is not very dense so removing these NC's would fit much more for that reason. This also includes:
- 00:04:201 (1) -
- 00:12:028 (1) -
- 00:14:637 (1) -

True, changed

00:16:593 (2) - lower this a bit since its a bit too close to slider 1 lowered

00:22:462 - it doesn't really make sense that you would ignore this particular note being played here. You follow every part of the main melody and along with that, the beat it follows so not mapping a circle here sounds completely off to what your intentions were. Other parts include:
- 00:27:680
- 00:32:897
- 00:38:115

same reason as Skyloft diff

01:18:549 (1) - blanket is a bit off. Middle point should be x:267 y:251 and end point should be x:311 y:308. changed

There's not much to this map. It is solid though, but still needs a few tinkers. Some blankets might be off lol.

Normal

[Normal]

Quick Succession of Spacing Changes:

Considering that this is normal. I don't think players are able to hit spacing changes that change between each note at all and you kind of just do it randomly at some points. Like...
- 00:16:593 (2,3) - No normal player is hitting this well changed
- 00:31:593 (1) - ^ changed
- 00:44:636 (1) - its a bit too big changed
- 01:23:115 (4,5,6) - these sucession of notes are simply a bit too much honestly. point was to make it hard because it was the most emphasized part of the song

- 00:21:158 (1,2) - I feel it was unnecessary to change the spacing at all here. It's random whether you do this or not on parts similar to this.
- 00:23:767 (1) - ^
- 00:36:810 (1,2) - ^
- 00:39:419 (1) - ^

changed all

There are other cases too. You're honestly better off keeping the same distance snap the whole way through instead. Jumps can be introduced in Hard instead of normal.

1/2 Reverse sliders

Nowadays, this simply isn't even allowed in a normal due to not knowing when they end and confusing nature at times. This includes...
- 00:41:375 (2) - No one is reading a reverse for 5 times in a normal
- 01:02:245 (4) - ^
- 01:07:462 (4) - ^
- 01:12:680 (4) - ^
- 01:17:897 (4) - ^
- 00:54:419 (3,4) - These are less extreme, but still concerning
- 00:56:375 (3,4) - ^
- 00:58:984 (3,4) - ^

Alternatives would be using 1/1 sliders instead of just slapping on some reverse to begin with or just use 1/2 circles at some point. changed some

Flow

Flow can be improved much greater than it currently is. Examples include...
- 00:18:549 (1,2,3) - Slider 3 can blanket the 2. The following slider (slider 4) can blanket slider 3 somewhat creating better movement and flow. did (i think)
- 00:41:375 (2) - move this more to the left and flip vertically
- 00:47:244 (1) - move this to the right for a better lead into the note
- etc etc...

did all

There are other improvements in other parts too, but flow is very depended on note placement overall and flow is different from everybody else anyways.

Honestly, this kind of just needs a rework since all three main issues are just presented throughout the whole map one way or another. will considering remapping

deetz' Easy

[deetz' Easy]

Too Many NC's

In my personal opinion, you basically have too many NC's due to NCing every downbeat or so. Due to very lack of notes overall. You would get about 1 to 4 notes every NC set and that's kind of just too little while also inflating the drain more. This can be changed by just NCing every two downbeats instead.
- 00:02:897 (1) - remove NC
- 00:08:115 (1) - ^
- 00:17:245 (1) - ^
- 00:19:854 (1) - ^
- etc etc...

This is everywhere in the map by the way.

There isn't much to talk about other then some flow improvements so that's really it.

Chalwa wrote:

00:08:115 (1,2) - Blanket improve no because of DS and it's barely noticeable at all
00:15:288 (3) - Ctrl + J looks better imo it's balanced with the slider in the same combo
00:32:245 (2) - Ctrl + H?? no cuz i don't want to
00:51:484 (2,1) - You can blanket it, but you must move 00:51:158 (1) a bit right i don't want to blanket it tho
00:57:354 (2,1) - Blanket improve
01:18:549 (1,2) - Why not blanket?? that is not even remotely close to being blanketed

Alheak wrote:

[deetz ez]

1. 00:13:332 (1) - why is it drums
2. 00:23:767 (1) - bend it the other way? idk better time than any to learn slider leniency!
3. 00:28:984 (1) - same my slider curve meme tho
4. 00:36:810 (1,1) - stacking non successive objects in easy may be confusing for beginners so prolly not a good idea meh i don't think this is a problem here but i'll see what i can do

Kalibe wrote:

deetz Easy -

* I rather to change OD and HP to 2 no, it's kind of a harder easy anyways
* Widescreen off can't make me!!!
* 00:15:941 (1) - Add whistle on head, because you also did it with 00:13:332 (1) - it's lower
* 01:42:028 (1,2) - I just prefer to make blanket with these, like these 00:08:115 (1,2) - distance snap
* 01:49:854 (1) - Try ctrl J and move on 284|160, plays cooler a bit for me. no thanks, i like this
* 01:53:767 (1) - Hmm.. How about removing this note 01:55:723 (1) - and add a reverse arrow to this 01:53:767 (1) - ? you missed the point of that circle :0

Kaifin wrote:

deetz

1. tag conflicts lolxd
2. 00:40:723 (1,2,3,4) - i think this is a little much for easy, 4 circles? you could do two 1/1s or maybe a 1/1 and 2 circles? i think would be a lot better for Easy eh it's just 1/1
3. 00:44:636 (1,2) - idk if you can fix this without fukin the triangle but lo l http://puu.sh/pDOBA/994b6fbe4b.jpg the slider fades away quickly enough :d
4. 00:57:354 (2,1) - everything is daijoubu http://puu.sh/pDOEd/d378688e47.jpg
5. 01:01:593 (1,1) - do you think this overlap will be too confusing for Easy player? i hope not!
6. 01:15:941 (1,2,1) - sik triangle the triangle is actually fine its just hte visual distance
   
   nice diff but imo with overlaps and amount of circles, its almost a normal lol just food for thought

1. Normal was buffed and renamed to Advanced.
2. deetz' Easy was renamed to Normal.
3. Did some polishing on the spread to be more balanced: 1.85 < 2.70 < 3.44 < 4.54 < 5.21
4. Remapped some parts of Skyloft in the kiai and before the kiai to increase playfield use and replicate rhythm better
5. Changed drum-hitfinish5 and soft-hitwhistle4 on the kiai to more fitting sounds (thanks to 09kami)

Hakurei Yoru wrote:

nice~

Xilver wrote:

handsome wrote:

01:10:723 (1,2,3,4,5,6) -
the rhythm pattern makes no sense here

giving handsome kd because we talked about improving Skyloft over discord, this was just one of many things he mentioned and I applied most of what he said (he's just a meme and won't post the whole thing Xd)

Ascendance wrote:

need logs or else don't give kd lol

_DT3 wrote:

M4M from your queue if you like
Hope you're fine if I only mod the easier diffs, that's as far as I can mod >.<

[deetz' Normal]
Maybe a bit higher AR? it needs to be suitable for lowest diff but i can do 3.5
00:02:245 (2,3,4) - Imo this looks weird and could flow better, maybe Ctrl + G (3) and adjust (4) accordingly like this http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5586328
00:08:115 (2,3) - Nazi blanket fix pls it disappears before you can notice it and i'd rather not fuck with the distance snap
00:13:984 (5) - I think it looks better if moved to 322, 199 (Head is in more of a triangle with 00:11:375 (2,4) ) the other slider has already disappeared by the time this appears, so the only slider that matters here is 4
00:23:767 (4,5) - I think something like this looks better http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5586371 your opinion
00:30:288 (6) - I think it's better if this is lower any particular reason?
00:32:245 (2) - Make it overlap with (1)? no thanks
00:45:941 (4) - So first I think this can be moved up by a bit. But I think this can be curved a bit more up or down i don't see any compelling reason to do that
00:59:636 (3) - Something minimal, but I think (2) can be copied, rotated by 15° and be used instead of (3) (The difference is minimal: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5586420) that is completely unnoticeable
01:47:245 (4,5) - I like it more if (4) would be at 114, 25 and (5) at 176, 212 i prefer what i have
01:47:897 (5,6,1) - The overlap is barely visible while playing but doesn't look good nevertheless imo it's actually not visible at all while playing

Felt like this diff could work a bit more on flow, but maybe it's just my style there's nothing particularly harsh here but it's a good time as any for players to learn that they don't need to follow sliders perfectly. imo this is more interesting for newbies to play

Xilver wrote:

Ascendance wrote:

need logs or else don't give kd lol

i see, didn't know that. feel free to deny then, should have been more careful.

deetz wrote:

_DT3 wrote:

00:02:245 (2,3,4) - Imo this looks weird and could flow better, maybe Ctrl + G (3) and adjust (4) accordingly like this http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5586328
Forgot this :^)

there's nothing particularly harsh here but it's a good time as any for players to learn that they don't need to follow sliders perfectly. imo this is more interesting for newbies to play Good point, but that point ahould probably be at advanced, also have to agree with the previous mod, could work s bit more on aesthetics

Kuuma wrote:

deetz' Normal

1. 00:52:462 (1) - These sliders are so ugly lol.. But honestly. You could make this curve more and then blanket the 00:51:484 (2)
2. 01:11:375 (3,1) - another place where you couldve done a blanket.. You dont have to though
3. 01:43:984 (3) - x:292 and y:212 would blanket it very nicely.. You’d have to move 01:45:288 (2) slightly down afterward but it makes for a nice aesthetic.
4. 01:52:136 (4,5,6) - Stack 4 and 6 and blanket them with the 5
   The fact that all i have to say on this diff is blankets means its pretty much ready for rank. Overall disappointed with the overall aesthetic of the diff (considering is a really beautiful song..) but eh to each their own.

deetz wrote:

.

to _DT3: take a look at some newbie replays yourself; i'm confident that it will cause no problems at all if the sliders don't all point at each other perfectly.

Kaifin wrote:

remod sinc u asked

smoothi

1. 00:05:506 (1,3) - ya http://puu.sh/pVx8A/7671d31f32.jpg k
2. 00:08:115 (1) - maybe stack on 00:05:832 (2) for a cleaner structure? not necessary but i think it'd be nice, you could also make 00:08:115 (1,3,4) - an actual line if you did this ok
3. 00:11:375 (2,1) - nazi move it a touch to the left its not perfectly straight (unless my eyes are deceiving me) its fine
4. 00:16:593 (3,4) - ME IRL holy http://puu.sh/pVxiW/72d1a36c6c.jpg you should move 3 away from 4 anyways or vice versa not just because the blanket is fuckd but because its closer to the note than my tumours are to ending my miserable fuking life already fixed
5. 00:18:223 (5) - maybe its just the angle, but damn is that some high spacing for the intensity of the note in relation to every other note in this section this is fine cause downbeat
6. 00:30:288 (1,1) - literal nazi http://puu.sh/pVxov/a163201183.jpg this is fine
7. 00:39:419 (1) - it wuld be nice if this was a little more to the right imo, would make it look a lot better with how it relates to 00:38:115 (1) (you know what im sayin hopefully) mk
8. 01:00:778 (3,4,5,1) - i know it might be hard but if you could make these notes not touch it would look 10x nicer imo but it plays better now
9. 01:17:734 (3,3) - ded http://puu.sh/pVxuF/934e6313d8.jpg this ones fine
10. 01:40:071 (3,4) - crawlin in my skin http://puu.sh/pVxw4/c9679749ff.jpg fine
11. 01:55:723 (1) - stellar meme

it was ok

1. I'm going to soon upload a temporary keysounded version of Skyloft, made by mithew. (I can't upload it right now because the audio files are too large sadly). I'd like to possibly hear feedback from what you have to say about the keysounding and if the feedback is mostly positive, I will consider adding it to the set. Thank you!

_DT3

[Hard]
00:05:506 (1,2) - Can be adjusted to stack (2) with (5) i think it's fine
00:06:810 (3,4,1) - Blanket looks nice, but the overlap troubles me a bit... made it less ugly i think
00:31:593 (1,2,3,4) - Why not the same spacing as here: 00:30:288 (1,2,3,4) - etc.? same reason as kuuma's mod
01:51:158 (3) - You use skystar wave sliders? Ok then ^^ (Just a comment) yeeeeeeee


[Advanced]
00:01:593 (1) - I feel like this NC is unnecessary but it might be intentional (Same with 00:04:201 (1) - ) fits Skyloft more because it had it there aswell
00:05:506 (1) - Why not stacked perfectly? they're not? i changed it a bit from previous mods hopefully it's perfect by then
00:05:506 (1,2,1,2) - What about something like this? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5586483 i kinda like it better when it's side to side like that
00:18:223 (5,1,2,3) - Same as in Normal, the overlap is barely visible while playing but doesn't look good imo tried to make it as pretty as i could
00:22:462 - I feel like this beat is strong. This should be mapped imo with a HC even if that was intentional it was mapped to the piano/flute synth for this part, did the same thing for Skyloft/hard
00:25:071 - ^
00:27:680 - ^
00:30:288 - Same here but a slider is better because the beat here is kinda connected with the beat here 00:30:615
00:40:071 (3,4,1,2) - Kinda don't like the look of this constellation did a blanket, hopefully it looks nicer
01:02:734 (6) - I think it's best if stacked with (5) nah
01:12:517 (2,3,4,5,1) - Plays weird imo i think it's fine, flow is nice
01:49:528 (3,1) - Why is there no blanket here? Would fit made one from previous mod
01:53:767 (3,4,5,6) - Could look better fixed

1. 00:34:202 (4) - i wouldn't curve this, feels like it lines up better with the patterns around it straight
2. 00:39:419 (4) - this doesn't feel like it fits well next to 00:38:115 (3) - idk
   idk how to mod lowdiffs anymore

1. 00:00:289 (1,2,1,2) - don't be afraid to have minor inconsistencies in ds to make visually appealing patterns like this
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:02:897 (1,2,1) - something that was pointed out to me in the past was trying to make sure that spacings between notes like this don't go below the base spacing, even when they're not adjacent on the timeline. so basically this instead of what you have. helps make rhythms clear and creates more visual balance
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:05:506 (1,2) - holy these are so easy to have blanket each other, should do that
4. 00:09:419 (3,4) - this is an example of where i wouldn't do the double blanket since it sets up a bad visual transition to the next slider. could try something else instead
5. 00:17:897 (4,5,1) - same point as earlier about even visual spacing, won't mention it any more
6. 00:21:158 - is there a particular reason for the varying note spacings during this section? if there is then it'd be fine to leave but i just want to know, since otherwise it'd be nice to keep it all the same
7. 00:30:941 (1,1) - another meh visual transition, there's enough space in the timeline that you can move 1 around pretty freely as long as it's not super close to the previous pattern
8. 00:41:375 (2,3,1) - man i don't wanna nazi all your triangles but ether make them clearly equilateral or clearly not cause otherwise it just looks eh
9. 00:48:875 (4,5) - me irl
10. 01:02:571 (5,6,1) - i wouldn't space these out. creates a lot of very sudden stress from the first actual 1/2 rhythm of the map clicks-wise coupled on top of this having the highest velocity of the map. stacked would be better.
11. 01:12:517 (2,3,4,5,1) - i really don't like the flow here, i think it'll be very stressful to hit. this whole kiai section i think needs a revisit with some more stacking instead of all this high spacing and/or more balance throughout the diff to compensate.
12. 01:23:441 (1) - kinda a random nc
    i think this diff needs more attention imo, i didn't even get into visual stuff in the kiai since the rhythm and design around the rhythm became such a large point

1. visual points from the previous diff apply here too, not gonna go into them that much
2. 00:11:375 (2,1) - 00:13:984 (2,1) - really not a fan of these transitions, to me it makes the fact that you curved 2 the way you did pointless, and if you're going to lead the flow in a different direction you should adjust the slider to match, or vice versa.
3. 00:20:506 (1,1,1) - this should be 1/6
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:28:984 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i'm sure you can grid these more neatly than this, you can see when you select them all that it doesn't line up
5. 00:43:821 (2,3) - something to note is that this doesn't actually fit with the melody that (i think) you're following. i'd do this instead
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:58:658 (3) - don't be afraid to just not curve things lol, this curve looks forced to just "always have things curved" when straight sliders do work well in this situation
7. 01:02:897 (1,2) - visual transition blah blah asdf it also makes sense to lead this better since the spacing starts changing here
8. 01:23:441 (6) - i'd move this up above 5 instead, the move back down just doesn't fit imo

• man your name is so long lol, idk what kind of abbreviation you could do but it's so long in a gd name haha

1. 00:00:289 (1,2) - imo a regular 180 rotate would work better than a ctrl gh, it just looks slightly off to me
2. 00:10:723 (1) - something i tend to do with sliders like this, is either make it clearly centered or clearly off center, so more like these. just clears up any sort of doubt that would make the map look visually messy
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:11:375 (2) - also i'd adjust this so the end isn't so close to the end of 1 but that's a personal choice, i think it just looks better like when i mentioned the whole clean visual spacing thing in xilver's earlier diffs
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:20:506 - this should be 1/6
5. 00:36:810 (1,2,3,4) - could do this for the cleaner visual pattern
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:59:473 (3,4) - an idea for this could be to flip it like you did later on
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:12:028 - ehh you skipped this note when you've been mostly following this background drum track for the whole kiai, kinda a random shift that could throw people off
8. 01:55:723 (1) - hey the bg in editor doesn't line up with the bg in play, so you actually need to move this note down and to the right a bit to be on top of the moon xd

1. 00:08:767 (2) - ehh really not a fan of how this looks, straight slider would work nicely here and make it easier to blanket with 1
2. 00:20:506 (1,1,1) - same as before in lower diffs
3. 00:31:593 (1,2,3,4) - imo the problem with a pattern like this is the fact that the ds dropping this much means that the followpoints stop appearing between 3 and 4, so you get this weird visual thing where 1-2-3 4 and it just looks bad imo
4. 00:41:375 (1,2,3,4,1) - this star made me cry a little on the inside
   i'm going to start getting super blunt from here on out because there's a lot of things from here on that just made me not want to mod anymore but i'll do it anyways
5. 00:42:517 - rhythm skips the high point of the melody and puts it on the slider end instead
6. 00:43:821 (2,3,4,5,6) - awkward jump pattern seemingly forced in for the sake of the symmetry aspect
7. 00:46:593 (3,4,5,6) - awkward flow from the perfectly linear into a sudden jump down
8. 00:47:571 (2,3,4,5,6) - not sure what kind of flow this goes under but it's basically awkward back and forth with a sudden increase in spacing at 6, feels weird
9. 00:49:038 (2,3,4,5,6) - really forced star pattern for the stream, i get that it's a motif but it's not well executed. i guess reversing the direction helps
10. 00:51:158 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i don't think i can express in words how much i hate patterns like these but i can say that from my experience they play like crap from the mostly linear flow into jumps on the downbeats.
11. 01:02:245 (3,4,5,6) - ^ but moreso from the distance increase. scaling ds on linear flow is so uncomfortable to play
12. 01:04:202 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1) - these have absolutely no flow from stream to stream, you basically play one, jerk over to the next, play it, and then jerk over to the last one
13. 01:13:984 (4,5,6,7) - why are these jumps so much larger than 01:12:680 (1,2,3,4) - which to me the latter combo is the more prominent one in the music
14. 01:17:571 (3) - your obsession with making every single slider curve like this just makes patterns like this way worse than they need to be, a straight slider here basically fixes the flow by not forcing the flow in an awkward direction
15. 01:19:854 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - these play well together do more things like this
16. 01:23:115 (1,2,1,2,1) - please no

6th wrote:

[Normal]
00:30:288 (6) - Placing it at (5)'s right reduces its impact a lot imo. want to keep it flowy
01:07:462 - repeating the slider at the less noticeable sound is not a really good idea. The only instrument that would justify it starts here 01:06:973 - hitsounds should make it clear what i'm doing
01:17:571 (2) - ^
01:22:462 (1,2) - This part deserves to be more intense. Use more circles please. sure
01:45:615 - 01:48:223 - 01:50:180 - is there any reason to skip them ? density of the whole section
01:53:767 (6,1) - Considering it's the only stack in your diff it may be really unpredictable and hard to read for beginners, gather more opinions. asked around and shouldn't be a problem

Xilver wrote:

EDIT: Changed metadata source to "BMS", since it seems to have a bigger impact there and it came before the Deemo feature.