[-Deemo-] wrote:

[General]
I don't mod taiko, but the AIMod shows a lot of things conflict with the Ura Oni Difficulty
The Storyboard is interesting, because it has that little echo effect after hitting things, but what if the person doesn't hit it? .3.

[Easy]
00:23:221 - I suggest removing the clap, it kinda sound awkward to have finish-whistle-clap followed by practically the same slider with only finish/whistle-whistle

[Normal]
Enable Epilepsy warning

[Hard]
Enable Epilepsy warning
00:22:834 (4) - Object isn't snapped
00:22:834 (4) - Also don't overlap with with 00:23:608 (1) -

[Insane]
Enable Epilepsy warning
00:12:770 (1) - Curving this so there isn't a little gap looks better imo
00:13:544 (2) - ^
00:17:221 (7) - Object isn't snapped
00:23:414 (7) - ^
00:18:189 (5,6) - Move 5 to blanket 6 a bit better

[Extreme]
Enable Epilepsy warning

[Extra]
Enable Epilepsy warning

That's about it, couldn't really mod Extreme and Extra, due to it going so fast and making my eyes hurt ;-;

baraatje123 wrote:

Surono, I also applied all of your things (forgot to add it into the previous post

Kantan,Futsuu,Muzukashii, this spinner 00:26:802 - change to slider, Inner Oni and Ura have stream in here, stream can alternate it with slider

00:12:770 - D , sound same like 00:13:544 - but more higher

here for better sound
00:20:512 - K
00:21:286 - d
00:21:673 - delete
00:22:060 - add d
00:22:447 - delete
00:22:834 - add K

00:12:770 - D , like kantan thing

00:08:124 - D, low>high>low>high>low>high

00:04:447 - d pls
00:08:124 - D, like muzu thing
00:11:028 - add d ?
00:12:479 - kdddk ? followong flow because this begining have much kdd and ddk

00:12:576 - d, this bit stream is not good with this k

[R] wrote:

shortest bm mod
from queue
every "?" lines just an opinion

[General]

Kantan,Futsuu,Muzukashii, this spinner 00:26:802 - change to slider, Inner Oni and Ura have stream in here, stream can alternate it with slider Good Idea!

[Kantan]

00:12:770 - D , sound same like 00:13:544 - but more higher

here for better sound
00:20:512 - K I follow the claps
00:21:286 - d
00:21:673 - delete
00:22:060 - add d
00:22:447 - delete
00:22:834 - add K d to follow rhythm

[Futsuu]

00:12:770 - D , like kantan thing

[Muzukashi]

00:08:124 - D, low>high>low>high>low>high K feels better, because of the huge thundercloud sound type of sound

[Oni]

00:04:447 - d pls
00:08:124 - D, like muzu thing It's a really loud sound, K feels beter (see muzu)
00:11:028 - add d ?
00:12:479 - kdddk ? followong flow because this begining have much kdd and ddk

[Inner Oni]

00:12:576 - d, this bit stream is not good with this k This plays better imo

Not much but hope helpfull
Good Luck ~

1. you should finish with spin from 00:26:705 - to 00:31:350 - in all diffs to keep a general consistency
2. You are overusing finishers, is not a good idea to start with K at 00:01:157 - because It is an extremely fine sound and you start with finish at 00:01:931 - different sound/different note.
3. I can feel finishers only at 00:01:931 - 00:08:124 - 00:14:318 (1) -
4. SB is annoying

1. delete some finishers: 00:05:028 (4) - 00:05:802 (5) - 00:06:576 (6) - 00:07:350 (7) - 00:07:737 (8) -
2. 00:11:221 (11,12) - remove finish here too
3. 00:17:802 (21) - move to 00:17:028 - because you need breaks to add more emphasis on 00:17:415 - 00:18:189 - 00:18:963 - 00:19:737 -
4. 00:19:350 (24) - delete if you follow my preview advice

1. remove more finishers: 00:01:157 (1) - 00:05:028 (4) - 00:05:802 (5) - 00:06:576 (6) - 00:06:963 (7) - 00:07:350 (8) - 00:11:221 (14) - 00:12:770 (19) - + all finishers on kiai except 00:23:608 (52) - 00:25:157 (56) - 00:25:931 (58) -

1. 00:05:995 (16) - add a rest here
2. 00:07:350 (20,21,22,23,24) - wtf? why finishers? orz
3. Well remove finisher on kiai part too >.>
4. 00:22:253 (79,80,81,82) - same as 00:20:705 (71,72,73,74) - previously you did 00:14:512 (43,44,45,46) - 00:16:060 (51,52,53,54) -
5. 00:26:705 (103,1) - wth? xDD

1. 00:26:705 (158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,1) - delete all ._. As I said in General, this part is not good to map
2. 00:05:318 - add a note here and 00:06:479 (33) - move to 00:06:092 - to keep consistency with the same sound
3. I'm surprised, Idk what are you following? some patterns looks ramdomly, I can't see consistency, Finishers make me crazy. xDD

1. 00:04:157 (20) - delete
2. 00:05:318 - add o to fix a better rhythm and delete 00:05:899 (33) - to keep consistency with the same sound
3. 00:08:995 (55) - is more necessary at 00:08:802 - imo
4. 00:09:673 (61,62,63,64,65,66,67) - and 00:10:447 (68,69,70,71,72,73,74) - and 00:11:221 (75,76,77,78,79,80,81) - have the same sound? please!!
5. 00:26:705 - spin start here

1. 1.40 oki
2. I like kiai part but intro is too overmaped bro, really
3. from 00:05:028 - to 00:07:544 - I'm surprised again because in Inner Oni this part were over-over-over-overmapped and Ura Oni have a rest?
4. 00:08:995 (52) - move to 00:08:802 -
5. 00:26:705 - spin ._.

Flying Pan wrote:

Hi, from my queue. Here's your order~

Ura Oni

00:02:995 (13) - change to k
00:03:770 (21) - ^
00:04:544 (29) - ^
then the kat heard at the stream sounds better

00:05:028 (34) - change to d Made (33) k for more emphasis on this one

00:09:673 (59,60) - swap
00:11:028 (72) - k

Inner Oni

seems okay

Oni

00:29:028 (178,179) - swap these to give better impact at the finisher

Muzukashii

00:19:737 (67) - K

00:24:770 (93) - k, i think there's a clap

00:26:802 (1) - this spinner override the slider. fix it

Futsuu

00:01:931 (2) - D, sounds better Really highpitched, keeping K
00:08:124 (9) - ^
00:17:415 (32) - ^ K feels better patternwise (consistent with the rest)
00:22:060 (47) - ^ ^^
00:23:608 (52) - ^ ^^

Kantan

00:01:931 (2) -D
00:16:641 (19) - k Following claps in music, no clap here -->d
00:20:899 (27) - move to 00:21:673 -

okay that's all. good luck~

-Sh1n1- wrote:

Hi bro~~ from M4M

[General]

1. you should finish with spin from 00:26:705 - to 00:31:350 - Slidersfeel better IMO, made them all slider+spinner
2. You are overusing finishers, is not a good idea to start with K at 00:01:157 - because It is an extremely fine sound and you start with finish at 00:01:931 - different sound/different note.
3. I can feel finishers only at 00:01:931 - 00:08:124 - 00:14:318 (1) -
4. SB is annoying

[Kantan]

1. delete some finishers: 00:05:028 (4) - 00:05:802 (5) - 00:06:576 (6) - 00:07:350 (7) - 00:07:737 (8) -
2. 00:11:221 (11,12) - remove finish here too
3. 00:17:802 (21) - move to 00:17:028 - because you need breaks to add more emphasis on 00:17:415 - 00:18:189 - 00:18:963 - 00:19:737 -
4. 00:19:350 (24) - delete if you follow my preview advice

[Futsuu]

1. remove more finishers: 00:01:157 (1) - 00:05:028 (4) - 00:05:802 (5) - 00:06:576 (6) - 00:06:963 (7) - 00:07:350 (8) - 00:11:221 (14) - 00:12:770 (19) - + all finishers on kiai except 00:23:608 (52) - 00:25:157 (56) - 00:25:931 (58) -

[Muzukashii]

1. 00:05:995 (16) - add a rest here
2. 00:07:350 (20,21,22,23,24) - wtf? why finishers? orz
3. Well remove finisher on kiai part too >.>
4. 00:22:253 (79,80,81,82) - same as 00:20:705 (71,72,73,74) - previously you did 00:14:512 (43,44,45,46) - 00:16:060 (51,52,53,54) - They're all slightly higher pitched, thus different pattern
5. 00:26:705 (103,1) - wth? xDD

[Oni]

1. 00:26:705 (158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,1) - delete all ._. As I said in General, this part is not good to map
2. 00:05:318 - add a note here and 00:06:479 (33) - move to 00:06:092 - to keep consistency with the same sound
3. I'm surprised, Idk what are you following? some patterns looks ramdomly, I can't see consistency, Finishers make me crazy. xDD

[Inner Oni]

1. 00:04:157 (20) - delete It follows the sound better IMO
2. 00:05:318 - add o to fix a better rhythm and delete 00:05:899 (33) - to keep consistency with the same sound
3. 00:08:995 (55) - is more necessary at 00:08:802 - imo
4. 00:09:673 (61,62,63,64,65,66,67) - and 00:10:447 (68,69,70,71,72,73,74) - and 00:11:221 (75,76,77,78,79,80,81) - have the same sound? please!! They do
5. 00:26:705 - spin start here

[Ura Oni]

1. 1.40 oki Keeping 1.60 as it's the highest diff after
2. I like kiai part but intro is too overmaped bro, really
3. from 00:05:028 - to 00:07:544 - I'm surprised again because in Inner Oni this part were over-over-over-overmapped and Ura Oni have a rest?
4. 00:08:995 (52) - move to 00:08:802 -
5. 00:26:705 - spin ._.

Diffs need a lot of work imo, specially from Oni to Kantan, remap some parts and remove finishers please, This time I give a general mod but I'll mod again when you find more mods. Good Luck and ask again if this mapset can be ranked because ranked version from P o M u T a and Kuo Kyoka are not available

OzzyOzrock wrote:

Hey baraatjejejtjttej! Hey Ozzyzzyzzoz Short song, but doesn't mean I'll nit-pick, heh. Sorry if this clashes with the mod above, I didn't see it...
Song is rankable btw.

[Ura Oni]
1.6SV is so ugly to me ;_; Not to me
OD and HP should be at 6. Set at 7 because I deleted final stream

Why did you hitsound the intro stream? XD

The whole beginning stream part is more like dkkkdkkkdkkkdkkkd. Plus the streams you use from 00:08:899 () - to 00:12:770 () - are super similar to what you're already mapping in the kiai. Re-map the stuff before kiai to fit the song more? Streams like kkddk and ddkkdkk should be fitting for parts after 00:08:124 () so you don't have to map another long stream or something to fit the song.

00:16:834 (128) - k, since the pitch rises
00:20:415 (161) - ^, should be fine to keep the other ones the same though.
00:21:673 (166) - d here, because it's not particularly high Following claps
00:25:060 (199) - this should be a 'k', to make 00:25:157 (200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208) a lot more clearer.

Normal people wouldn't touch that ending stream and leave it a spinner lol..but it's fun at this bpm. Decided to delete. Tbh, I only mapped it because I wanted a 1-2-3-4-5-6 star spred
Pretty steady diff, just the intro needs some uniqueness!
[Inner Oni]
OD 6 here too. It is O.o
Delete 00:04:157 (20) then 00:05:124 () - add a 'k'? This way you have a 7 stream, a little break, then the same 7 stream. It's just more structured. Clash with other mod
00:07:737 (43,44,45,46,47,48) - d d dddk? A simpler 1/6 pattern for this lower difficulty. d d kddk feels easier (instead of spamming d)
00:09:770 (62) - delete this so it's 5 7 5 7? Clash with other mod
00:11:221 (74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92) - how about mapping a simpler stream (like the drums) instead of one so close to the one currently in Ura Oni? Clash with other mod
00:16:834 (122) - k, for the higher pitch.
00:17:124 (124,125) - kd? 00:17:221 (125,126) - these are actually the same pitch
00:17:802 (129,135,141) - these 'd', so the last one can be dkkdk and compliment the higher note on that one? Following claps
00:21:866 (162) - d? it's the same pitch as the next note, and sounds better.
00:22:447 () - add d here? only place with 2 doubles in the song k for clap
00:23:415 (173) - same as 2 suggestions up
00:25:060 (188) - k for the same stream clarity reasons
00:26:705 () - I think this diff shouldn't have the 1/6 ending , but if you want to keep it, move the third 1/6 to 00:28:253 () - it's more musical.

Sloppy looking difffff (I think it could benefit from more doubles) but it's a pretty good difficulty fill.
[Oni]
OD 6 works fine.
00:15:673 (82) - d, to stop dk spam
00:16:834 (91) - k, ^
00:20:802 (117) - k probably works better here too
00:23:318 (136,137,138) - kd d?
00:25:737 (153) - removing this note works without bringing in an awkward feeling stream
00:26:705 () - Would really prefer this isn't mapped considering the only real sounds are the stream stuff, but if you really want to freestyle, this is probably beter lmao.

But diff is fine overall.
[Muzukashii]
00:14:318 (42) - past this note, I don't think you should add any more finishers in the kiai. It just clutters the map and makes it confusing for muzu players ;_; Clash with other mod
00:23:608 (86,91) - ...except for these, these are fine.
00:25:931 (101) - but this one especially not.
00:20:802 (72) - k?
00:26:705 (103,1) - what.... lmfao NO it's not ok lol XD, keep it a slider then a spinner?

But nice diff.
[Futsuu]
OD 5 is good for futsuu.
00:11:221 (14,19) - would recommend removing these finishers Clash with other mod
Same thing with big notes in the kiai. In lower diffs just because there are a lot more opportunities to use them doesn't mean they should be there
00:20:124 (41) - remove this note to make a break.
00:15:866 (27) - d? then the other ones after can be d d k and you can make 00:15:866 (27) - into just a k (remove the note in the middle). Futsuu is more stuff like this than 'k ddk d k ddk', it's simple patterns with breaks in between. ?? The note in the middle is one of the strongest sounds
00:23:220 (49,50,51) - k k d d should make this part more interesting
00:25:157 (55) - remove finish here? the last one being a big note is nice enough

[Kantan]
OD 4 is low enough for kantan
00:07:737 (8) - delete this, kantan plays will not be able to comprehend these ginormous faces Removed all finishes, so I think this is okay
00:13:544 (14) - ^ but because it just sounds better
00:18:963 (23,24,25) - k k k so it's not d k d 3 times? ;_; Clash with other mod
00:20:512 (26,27,28) - in the beginning, it's d d k d, here the onbeat starts with d k d. fix that? Clash with other mod, I think
00:24:382 (33) - k?
00:26:705 (36) - i think having it all a spinner fits kantan more Consistency

Sorry if this clashed with the mod above! Good luck!

Reditum wrote:

OK GENERALLY I WRITE MY INTRO POST BEFORE LOOKING AT THE MAP BUT I JUST LOOKED AT THE HARDEST DIFF AND LIKE JESUS CHRIST IM NOT READY

Extra:
ok so uhhhhh
00:01:931 (1) - Do you think that like wow there's all of this cool rhythmic stuff happening in the background and like you focus on my mom's dial-up laptop turning on. LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
00:05:028 - Just gonna do a general thing here. It'd be super wonderful and magical if you firstly did your combos in groups of 2, and didn't make the colors so colorful, as they're against a black and white background. This is easirs to read, fixed the colors
00:11:221 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - This isn't as fun as you think it is trust me.
00:25:253 (1,1,1) - like are you even taking this game seriously. When you have complex rhythm like that, one of the coolest things you can do is make it readable so people can hit the notes and be happy. This part is like the only part I can completely pass w/o trouble everytime, it;s the easiest part of the map (except the start) IMO

Like my mind pretty much shut off for most of this diff. Somewhat because I haven't played the game since 2013 and somewhat because like you're trying to make this map REALLY hard which is cool except the song really doesn't call for that. I can't really call this intentionally hard. I've mapped playable 7-8 star diffs before

Extreme *guitar rifF*:
00:01:931 (1) - ok please don't do this in every diff come on But it fits ;-;
00:10:446 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - like i get that this is the aesthetic that like it's noncomformity or something but like ugggh please dont You haven't modded in a long time then, patterns such as these are very popular now, even in 200 bpm maps
00:11:221 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - THIS IS LITERALLY THE SAME PART FROM EXTRA JUST SPACED DOWN PLEASE TURN OFF THE EDITOR. LOOOOOOOL. But but but... I love such streams, changed it tho

Same stuff as Extra pretty much

Insane:
00:01:931 (1) - A. B.
00:06:576 (3) - NC.
00:25:931 (1) - Like if you're going to do sliderspeed things with this slider, make it consistent. The insane diff player can handle stuff like that. wut? There are no changes here

Hard:
00:01:931 (2) - i hate living. LOOLLL, keeping it as it fits a lot IMO (Idk what else to do tbh, cuz it's hard)
00:14:318 - there's probably a spread thing here idunno it's a lot easier tho

Normal:
00:01:931 (1,2,3) - HE'S FINALLY BACK TO KICK SOME TAIL. ALSO YES GREAT JOB FRIEND YOU ARE DOING WONDERFUL SEE ALL THE CONENT YOU CAN MILK OUT OF THAT. What the. I don't even

Ok so long story short the mod isn't super long because it's a short map and I'm not one for long mods but tl;dr I really don't like the higher diffs. Half of that comes from me being me but the other half sees it as just being a huge content overload. I feel like the map is trying to be harder than what it is, and I feel rushed and pressured whenever I play it. I know this is my first step back into the modding scene and I look like a total cunt right now but uhhh yeah, it's too much for me.

Also, get your SB finished. It looks really tacky when you have bright colors against a black and white background. You can be colorful, but get dark and earthy colors rather than playset colors. Thanks! This is one heck of a good suggestion

1. 00:29:415 Missing slidertick.

1. 00:17:415 (21,22,23,24,25,26) - d is too continuous. change few notes to k. e.g.) 00:18:963 (23,24) -
2. i recommend HP+2.0? HP5 is very easy to pass. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3424166

1. 00:12:576 (18) - k is better..? imo.
2. HP7 is better, similar reason as Kantan.
3. 00:17:027 (30,31,32) - I think kkd is better. ddk is so many.

1. HP7 is better. see above.
2. 00:14:512 (42,43,44,45) - 1/4 dk-dk pattern is too hard on Muzukashii, so you should change to easier pattern. e.g.) Delete these. 00:14:512 (42,44) -
3. 00:16:060 (50,51,52,53) - ^
4. 00:20:705 (70,71,72,73) - ^ kk-kd is too hard, too.
5. 00:22:253 (78,79,80,81) - ^
6. 00:25:157 (94,95,96,97,98,99,100) - this pattern is too complicated. try this.
   

1. 00:06:963 (36,37,38) - I think these Finishers are bit noisy. consider to remove finish.
2. It does not mean there is a problem with this diff itself, but i think you need to delete some notes for better spread with Muzu.

1. 00:06:576 (39,40,41,42) - Remove Finish? similar reason as Oni.
2. there are too many Finish notes, so i recommend to remove. e.g.) 00:15:866 (114,126,132,138,144) -
3. 00:07:931 (45,46,47,48) - personally, kkkd is better.
4. i recommend to delete few notes for better spread with Oni and Ura. i think

1. 00:17:608 (149,150,151,152,153,154,155) -, ~ dkddkdk patterns are so many. why don't you make another pattern? e.g.) dkddkkd/ ddkdkkd

Aldwych wrote:

Hi!
Today i'm gonna show YOUUU how 2 make an old-Fashioned MLG Pie! ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Mod requested!

[General]

Well i dislike your settings on lower levels but opinions xd

[Kantan]

00:13:544 : Imo you can delete this note, alone, it doesn't have real interest (meaning this note coupled with 00:13:834 etc... for example is worth).
00:16:641 : I found the rythm more interesting by using a k here instead of d. Following claps in music
00:22:834 : Same, plus it makes your kiai section less boring. I know both of them are suggestion because you're using k at obvious time, but hey, let's do less std convert on taiko meps lul.

Well... lol how to miss a kantan here. Impossible

[Futsuu]

00:11:995 : Hmmm it seems that you have used a note here. But you should delete this note, the rythm will be much bettern with the new 2 distincts patterns.
00:15:866 : Why didn't you turn this one to k? The sound goes up here.
00:17:027 : By the rythm, kkd is more appropriate
00:21:672 : ^ but here kdd.

The rythm is good but not the pattern on kiai imo. They aren't representative of the music.

[Muzukashii]

00:15:092 : This kind of note should be k imo. It fits better the doublets and the music.
00:16:641 : Same as above for this and the next one.
00:20:028 : I know the music is quite short, but imo you should delete this note i find this muzukashi quite dense and technical, you got doublets and full 3/4 space, you should let the player take a short breathe.

Well it's ok for me tho.

[Oni]

Lel the hitsounds has changed.

00:21:770 : I think kddk is more adapted, the low sounds are on the middle.

After i cannot mod Harder diff.

[Spread]

00:01:157++ (Kantan to Oni) : THere's some troubles here, let's take a look on both diff.






There's no real difference between kantan and futsuu while in muzukashii you go full 1/2 and on Oni full 1/4. Imo you should use some 1/2 on futsuu, some 1/4 on muzukashii to close the gap.

And that's all i can say. By far you're close of the requerements (lol far close lmao get it), sorry Ozzy i don't mod Inner and Ura.
Gl hf for rank

tasuke912 wrote:

Hi,
here's Taiko mod.
[ General]

1. 00:29:415 Missing slidertick. Probably a bug, the sider is snapped so idk

[ Kantan]

1. 00:17:415 (21,22,23,24,25,26) - d is too continuous. change few notes to k. e.g.) 00:18:963 (23,24) -
2. i recommend HP+2.0? HP5 is very easy to pass. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3424166 Intended

[ Futsuu]

1. 00:12:576 (18) - k is better..? imo.
2. HP7 is better, similar reason as Kantan.
3. 00:17:027 (30,31,32) - I think kkd is better. ddk is so many.

[ Muzukashii]

1. HP7 is better. see above.
2. 00:14:512 (42,43,44,45) - 1/4 dk-dk pattern is too hard on Muzukashii, so you should change to easier pattern. e.g.) Delete these. 00:14:512 (42,44) -
3. 00:16:060 (50,51,52,53) - ^
4. 00:20:705 (70,71,72,73) - ^ kk-kd is too hard, too.
5. 00:22:253 (78,79,80,81) - ^ Denied all of them, It's a fairly low BPM, and they are all singletappable. Keeping them
6. 00:25:157 (94,95,96,97,98,99,100) - this pattern is too complicated. try this. That doesn't follow the rhythm. This part in the song is completely off-beat making playing it really hard, even though it follows rhythm properly
   

[ Oni]

1. 00:06:963 (36,37,38) - I think these Finishers are bit noisy. consider to remove finish.
2. It does not mean there is a problem with this diff itself, but i think you need to delete some notes for better spread with Muzu.

[ Inner Oni]

1. 00:06:576 (39,40,41,42) - Remove Finish? similar reason as Oni.
2. there are too many Finish notes, so i recommend to remove. e.g.) 00:15:866 (114,126,132,138,144) -
3. 00:07:931 (45,46,47,48) - personally, kkkd is better.
4. i recommend to delete few notes for better spread with Oni and Ura. i think

[ Ura Oni]

1. 00:17:608 (149,150,151,152,153,154,155) -, ~ dkddkdk patterns are so many. why don't you make another pattern? e.g.) dkddkkd/ ddkdkkd

Good luck!

Nyan wrote:

Kantan is fine.

[Futsuu]

00:22:834 (48) - can be small k

[Muzukashii]

Muzukashii usually not use 1/4 with different colors. Change all notes below to dd dd / kk kk / dd kk / kk dd

00:14:512 (42,43,44,45) -
00:16:060 (50,51,52,53) -
00:20:705 (70,71,72,73) -
00:22:253 (78,79,80,81) -
00:23:802 (86,87,88,89) -

00:25:157 (94,95,96,97,98,99,100) - This fits soo much better, thanks!!! (Made dk kk though


Oni diffs are fine.

CptBlackBird wrote:

Doot doot, mod as requested

[Insane]

00:05:415 - circle here Changed hitsounds to reduce the need for a circle

00:06:189 - ^ ^^

00:25:157 (1,2,3,4,5) - are you sure a player who plays 4 stars can fc this? Star rating on slider based maps is incredibly low, it's probably even easier then my other Insanes


[Extreme]

00:05:318 - add note Too much

00:05:415 - ^

00:05:512 - ^

00:05:608 - ^ Too much, and bad for distance

00:06:092 - ^ ^^

00:06:189 - ^

00:06:286 - ^

00:06:382 - ^ ^^

kinda feels better if you add notes there


[Extra]
Added the ones which I also added in Extreme
I can't even pass this, this is made by Satan

1. normal-hitwhistle has practically no sound until 0.015 milliseconds. This might be unrankable to BNs so you might have to fix that

1. Missing the epilepsy warning!
2. 00:22:253 (2,5) - These claps sound pretty out of place because you never get the chance to use them elsewhere in this diff.

1. 00:14:318 (1,2,3) - You might want to space the 2 out much more, they are extremely close compared to the rest of the notes like it. (For etc 00:17:415 (1,2,3) - and 00:20:512 (1,2,3) - )
2. 00:25:157 (1,2,3,4) - I know that this is mapped in 1/8th, but considering this is 4.12 stars, This design here is pretty hard, You first have 2 1/4 sliders considerably far a part, but my real problem is 00:25:448 (3,4,5) - A spaced triplet in the nearly complete opposite direction. I don't usually practice maps like these often so this might just be me over exaggerating or something.

1. Also missing the epilepsy warning!
2. 00:10:834 (1,2,3,4) - I don't really see why this quad is spaced less than 00:10:446 (1,2,3,4) -
3. 00:18:479 (1,2,3) - Instead, how about rotating #3 around 120 degrees and placing it left on #1? That way it the jump feels more natural and it still looks aesthetically pleasing (Unless your trying to make this as had as possible, then forget this.)
   
   Would maybe look like this

   
4. 00:21:867 (4,1) - Blanket could be better

• from Q
  
  imo the custom whistle doesn't reaaallly fit the song :c It sounds way to 'clicky' (terribly way of wording this but really the only thing I can think of) and it just doesn't feel like it accents the rather high pitched music very well. Though I guess this is kinda subjetive..><[/b]
  
  Easy

1. 00:03:479 (2) - Hard+ Diffs use Soft sampleset + Normal Additions for this while the Normal and the Easy don't
2. 00:01:931 (2) - ^
3. 00:07:454 - would you mind evening out the spacing here?
4. 00:09:672 (2,1) - mind making this blanket perfectly? I mean..it's a 30 sec map sooo why not have it as good as possible
5. 00:22:060 (3) - repeat here doesn't really make a whole lot of sense to me when considering that both surrounding white ticks are stronger, especially the one after the repeat.
6. 00:25:931 (3) - this is like two pixels from off-screen so uhh be careful while making adjustments to this
   
   Normal
   
7. 00:12:770 (1,2,3) - would switch the slider and the circles here, the drums landing on 00:13:350 (3) - feel a fair bit stronger than the ones currently landing on 2, so switching the rythm here would accent the song better
8. 00:18:963 (1,2) - don't really like the finish spam for these. The song is getting a little more high pitched yes, but since the finish is rather dull I don't really think this goes along with what you're trying to emphazise in the song Would obviously apply to all other Diffs if you feel like this needs fixing. Could try something like adding soft-additions on the repeat and the tail for these two 00:18:963 (1,2) -
9. 00:15:673 (3) - would be more intuitive if this was between 00:14:318 (1,2) -
10. 00:15:866 (1,2,3) - ^same goes for these
    
    Hard
    
11. 00:01:931 (2) - missing NC
12. 00:15:286 (5,6) - would probably look to reduce the spacing between these a litte to match 00:16:834 (5,6) - since the second one is a tad bit smoother to hit
13. 00:22:253 (2,4) - makes little sense to suddenly start following drums here when you didn't before, makes it kinda odd. Also having 00:22:447 (2) - this peak landing on a sildertail really isn't ideal + the fact that 00:23:124 (5) - also isn't clickable. Idk the rythm used here just really doesn't feel optimal at all ;_;
14. 00:24:963 (7) - is there a reason why this has not circle? No need to keep the rythm less dense during what is supposedly the most intense part of the song
    
    Insane
    
15. 00:13:544 (2) - feels kinda odd to skip the drums on the blue tick 00:13:834 (2) - here
16. 00:14:705 (3,4,5) - sharp angels here makes this reaaallly awkward, plus the fact that the jump between
17. 00:16:253 (3,4,5) - feels abit overdone especially with how little momentum the player has when going into this, just forces a big speed-up
18. 00:29:439 (1) - why not have this start on the white tick like you did with the rest of your Diffs?
    
    Extreme
    
19. 00:05:415 (2) - missing whistle?
20. 00:11:221 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I guess this is a sorta petty complaint, but it really doesn't feel like having this streams as almost stacks (very stationary) does the song justice since the 1/4 really doesn't feel monotonous or stationary
21. 00:14:318 (1,2,3) - peak here is actually on 2, so having this huge jump between 2->3 instead of 1->2 feels off
22. 00:20:512 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - you put NCs on all the peaks in the song previously and then you suddenly stop doing it here
23. 00:21:867 (4,1) - blanket here actually does look pretty sloppy so eh if you feel like fixing this..don't bother if you don't want to though haha
    
    Extra
    
24. 00:09:286 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - reaaallly not sure about such a harsh shape, especially when considering that the song doesn't really pick up in intensity at all. Just seems unreasonable
25. 00:12:963 (2,3,4) - three circles here on the drums would make sense if you're following them for 00:13:544 (1,2,3) -
26. 00:25:641 (1,1,1) - not an expert on this kinda star rating, but this just seems incredibly clunky to play, especially with the slowdown on the last slider
    
    Good Luck!

Gleipnir wrote:

1. normal-hitwhistle has practically no sound until 0.015 milliseconds. This might be unrankable to BNs so you might have to fix that

Hard
--------------------------------

1. Missing the epilepsy warning!
2. 00:22:253 (2,5) - These claps sound pretty out of place because you never get the chance to use them elsewhere in this diff Might be true, but it's also used for consistency with the other diffs.

Insane
--------------------------------

1. 00:14:318 (1,2,3) - You might want to space the 2 out much more, they are extremely close compared to the rest of the notes like it. (For etc 00:17:415 (1,2,3) - and 00:20:512 (1,2,3) - )
2. 00:25:157 (1,2,3,4) - I know that this is mapped in 1/8th, but considering this is 4.12 stars, This design here is pretty hard, You first have 2 1/4 sliders considerably far a part, but my real problem is 00:25:448 (3,4,5) - A spaced triplet in the nearly complete opposite direction. I don't usually practice maps like these often so this might just be me over exaggerating or something It's not hard actually.

Extreme
--------------------------------

1. Also missing the epilepsy warning!
2. 00:10:834 (1,2,3,4) - I don't really see why this quad is spaced less than 00:10:446 (1,2,3,4) -
3. 00:18:479 (1,2,3) - Instead, how about rotating #3 around 120 degrees and placing it left on #1? That way it the jump feels more natural and it still looks aesthetically pleasing (Unless your trying to make this as had as possible, then forget this.) Blankets, flow --> no
   
   Would maybe look like this

   
4. 00:21:867 (4,1) - Blanket could be better

Easy and Normal are fine, I wont mod extra because I can't play anything close to it, so I can't really give a real opinion

Kinda small but hopefully I picked out meaningful things to consider.
GL! I'll edit my post in your queue

Peachtrees wrote:

• from Q
  
  imo the custom whistle doesn't reaaallly fit the song :c It sounds way to 'clicky' (terribly way of wording this but really the only thing I can think of) and it just doesn't feel like it accents the rather high pitched music very well. Though I guess this is kinda subjetive..>< I Always like rather weirs samples[/b]
  
  Easy

1. 00:03:479 (2) - Hard+ Diffs use Soft sampleset + Normal Additions for this while the Normal and the Easy don't
2. 00:01:931 (2) - ^
3. 00:07:454 - would you mind evening out the spacing here? ??
4. 00:09:672 (2,1) - mind making this blanket perfectly? I mean..it's a 30 sec map sooo why not have it as good as possible
5. 00:22:060 (3) - repeat here doesn't really make a whole lot of sense to me when considering that both surrounding white ticks are stronger, especially the one after the repeat. I Always prefer such sliders over 1/1, idk why tbh
6. 00:25:931 (3) - this is like two pixels from off-screen so uhh be careful while making adjustments to this
   
   Normal
   
7. 00:12:770 (1,2,3) - would switch the slider and the circles here, the drums landing on 00:13:350 (3) - feel a fair bit stronger than the ones currently landing on 2, so switching the rythm here would accent the song better Strongest sound is on the (3), which is the slider. It makes sense for the sldier to be there as it has more impact
8. 00:18:963 (1,2) - don't really like the finish spam for these. The song is getting a little more high pitched yes, but since the finish is rather dull I don't really think this goes along with what you're trying to emphazise in the song Would obviously apply to all other Diffs if you feel like this needs fixing. Could try something like adding soft-additions on the repeat and the tail for these two 00:18:963 (1,2) - It's fine, unless someone has a better finish
9. 00:15:673 (3) - would be more intuitive if this was between 00:14:318 (1,2) -
10. 00:15:866 (1,2,3) - ^same goes for these
    
    Hard
    
11. 00:01:931 (2) - missing NC
12. 00:15:286 (5,6) - would probably look to reduce the spacing between these a litte to match 00:16:834 (5,6) - since the second one is a tad bit smoother to hit
13. 00:22:253 (2,4) - makes little sense to suddenly start following drums here when you didn't before, makes it kinda odd. Also having 00:22:447 (2) - this peak landing on a sildertail really isn't ideal + the fact that 00:23:124 (5) - also isn't clickable. Idk the rythm used here just really doesn't feel optimal at all ;_;
14. 00:24:963 (7) - is there a reason why this has not circle? No need to keep the rythm less dense during what is supposedly the most intense part of the song
    
    Insane
    
15. 00:13:544 (2) - feels kinda odd to skip the drums on the blue tick 00:13:834 (2) - here Intended, for more emphasis on the kiai
16. 00:14:705 (3,4,5) - sharp angels here makes this reaaallly awkward, plus the fact that the jump between
17. 00:16:253 (3,4,5) - feels abit overdone especially with how little momentum the player has when going into this, just forces a big speed-up
18. 00:29:439 (1) - why not have this start on the white tick like you did with the rest of your Diffs? 1/16 difference is unnoticalbe
    
    Extreme
    
19. 00:05:415 (2) - missing whistle?
20. 00:11:221 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I guess this is a sorta petty complaint, but it really doesn't feel like having this streams as almost stacks (very stationary) does the song justice since the 1/4 really doesn't feel monotonous or stationary used to be different, this plays better IMO
21. 00:14:318 (1,2,3) - peak here is actually on 2, so having this huge jump between 2->3 instead of 1->2 feels off Clap
22. 00:20:512 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - you put NCs on all the peaks in the song previously and then you suddenly stop doing it here Due to them almost all being sliders, nearly everything needs to be NC, which is not that great IMO
23. 00:21:867 (4,1) - blanket here actually does look pretty sloppy so eh if you feel like fixing this..don't bother if you don't want to though haha
    
    Extra
    
24. 00:09:286 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - reaaallly not sure about such a harsh shape, especially when considering that the song doesn't really pick up in intensity at all. Just seems unreasonable
25. 00:12:963 (2,3,4) - three circles here on the drums would make sense if you're following them for 00:13:544 (1,2,3) -
26. 00:25:641 (1,1,1) - not an expert on this kinda star rating, but this just seems incredibly clunky to play, especially with the slowdown on the last slider
    
    Good Luck!

1. I think you need another diff to fill the gap on N->H. It doesn't right while Hard have complex 1/4 rhythm and Normal just plain 1/1 and 1/2 rhythm, furthermore the SV diffrent kinda too big imo. So maybe you should reconsider that
2. normal-hitwhistle.wav is inaudible because below 100ms as stated on RC http://puu.sh/jwm8Z/7b2748d47a.png

1. 00:01:931 - How about http://puu.sh/jwhHH/8c0e4617c1.png, so it'll same as 00:02:705 -?
2. 00:03:479 - How about delete finish? as for me it's too loud and a bit conflict with whistle sound, and maybe you can set this http://puu.sh/jwhHH/8c0e4617c1.png also a bit same as above
3. 00:22:641 - 00:23:221 - 00:24:189 - 00:24:770 - Rather than whistle, a clap is more fit with the music there because give us stronger feedback
4. 00:25:157 (1) - How about use finish instead? kinda weird there since you useally use finish on the downbeat
5. 00:25:157 (1,2,3) - How about flip ctrl+j then to x:180 y:216. Because a bit cramped there, furthermore at a quick try it's almost out of play field
6. 00:29:439 - I guess that inherited point should be snap on 00:29:415 -

1. 00:03:092 (2) - Kinda too loud and a bit conflict with the finish. How about delete the whistle?
2. 00:09:479 (3) - 00:11:028 (3) - Add finish?
3. 00:12:770 (1) - I think just using clap is enough to emphsise the music, maybe delete that finish?
4. 00:20:512 (1,2,3) - Imo, that one kinda hard to hit after this sequences pattern 00:17:415 (1,2,1,2,1) -, furthermore the rhythm on kiai 00:14:318 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - kinda too long for Normal, I believe you should considering to delete one or two circles to lower the density imo
5. 00:24:770 (3) - Add clap? kinda too quite imo
6. 00:29:439 - I guess that inherited point should be snap on 00:29:415 -

1. 00:01:931 (1) - I guess the finish sound used on that 1/4 reverse not fit imo. So maybe delete finish on here 00:03:286 - then replace finish on here 00:03:479 - with clap. I think it'll sound nicer imo
2. 00:11:221 (1,2,3,1) - Too crampped imo and hard to move there. So maybe you can change the rhythm on that into http://puu.sh/jwk2e/6accab5a74.jpg, the placement something like http://puu.sh/jwk5v/a58d59da28.jpg
3. 00:22:834 (4) - That 1/4 slider with reverse kinda out of place imo, as you just usually use 1/4 slider without reverse make it awkward to play. How about change 00:22:834 (4) - into 1/2 rhythm instead? http://puu.sh/jwkzc/a4f5d66547.jpg
4. 00:25:834 (5,1,1) - How about make (1,1) more visible? since they are on blue and red tick it's better to see them clearly to make player easier distinguish the rhythm
5. 00:29:439 - I guess that inherited point should be snap on 00:29:415 -

1. 00:01:931 (1) - I guess the finish sound used on that 1/4 reverse not fit imo. So maybe delete finish on here 00:03:286 - then replace finish on here 00:03:479 - with clap. I think it'll sound nicer imo
2. 00:12:770 (1,2) - Tbh those two doesn't interprete anything from the music, just because you want a symetry, doesn;t nean ignore the rhythm itself
3. 00:25:157 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - The use of finish sound there somewhat not fit imo, just too loud and spamy

1. 00:01:931 (1) - I guess the finish sound used on that 1/4 reverse not fit imo. So maybe delete finish on here 00:03:286 - then replace finish on here 00:03:479 - with clap. I think it'll sound nicer imo
2. 00:25:253 (1,1,1,2,1) - The use of finish sound there somewhat not fit imo, just too loud and spamy
3. 00:25:931 (1) - I don't hear any significant change on the music, why put slowdown there? Imo that kind of thing not good kinda ruin the whole flow

Mako Sakata wrote:

[General]

1. I think you need another diff to fill the gap on N->H. It doesn't right while Hard have complex 1/4 rhythm and Normal just plain 1/1 and 1/2 rhythm, furthermore the SV diffrent kinda too big imo. So maybe you should reconsider that
2. normal-hitwhistle.wav is inaudible because below 100ms as stated on RC http://puu.sh/jwm8Z/7b2748d47a.png

[Easy]

1. 00:01:931 - How about http://puu.sh/jwhHH/8c0e4617c1.png, so it'll same as 00:02:705 -?
2. 00:03:479 - How about delete finish? as for me it's too loud and a bit conflict with whistle sound, and maybe you can set this http://puu.sh/jwhHH/8c0e4617c1.png also a bit same as above
3. 00:22:641 - 00:23:221 - 00:24:189 - 00:24:770 - Rather than whistle, a clap is more fit with the music there because give us stronger feedback
4. 00:25:157 (1) - How about use finish instead? kinda weird there since you useally use finish on the downbeat
5. 00:25:157 (1,2,3) - How about flip ctrl+j then to x:180 y:216. Because a bit cramped there, furthermore at a quick try it's almost out of play field Moved it to somewhere else, while keeping the Ctrl J
6. 00:29:439 - I guess that inherited point should be snap on 00:29:415 - Nope. I'm "silencing" the sencond slider, not the first one

[Normal]

1. 00:03:092 (2) - Kinda too loud and a bit conflict with the finish. How about delete the whistle?
2. 00:09:479 (3) - 00:11:028 (3) - Add finish?
3. 00:12:770 (1) - I think just using clap is enough to emphsise the music, maybe delete that finish?
4. 00:20:512 (1,2,3) - Imo, that one kinda hard to hit after this sequences pattern 00:17:415 (1,2,1,2,1) -, furthermore the rhythm on kiai 00:14:318 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - kinda too long for Normal, I believe you should considering to delete one or two circles to lower the density imo
5. 00:24:770 (3) - Add clap? kinda too quite imo
6. 00:29:439 - I guess that inherited point should be snap on 00:29:415 - See easy

[Hard]

1. 00:01:931 (1) - I guess the finish sound used on that 1/4 reverse not fit imo. So maybe delete finish on here 00:03:286 - then replace finish on here 00:03:479 - with clap. I think it'll sound nicer imo Sounds kinda bad with the custom samples
2. 00:11:221 (1,2,3,1) - Too crampped imo and hard to move there. So maybe you can change the rhythm on that into http://puu.sh/jwk2e/6accab5a74.jpg, the placement something like http://puu.sh/jwk5v/a58d59da28.jpg I personally really prefer this over your suggestion. The only thing I might consider here is splitting the kicksider into 2
3. 00:22:834 (4) - That 1/4 slider with reverse kinda out of place imo, as you just usually use 1/4 slider without reverse make it awkward to play. How about change 00:22:834 (4) - into 1/2 rhythm instead? http://puu.sh/jwkzc/a4f5d66547.jpg
4. 00:25:834 (5,1,1) - How about make (1,1) more visible? since they are on blue and red tick it's better to see them clearly to make player easier distinguish the rhythm
5. 00:29:439 - I guess that inherited point should be snap on 00:29:415 - See easy

[Insane]

1. 00:01:931 (1) - I guess the finish sound used on that 1/4 reverse not fit imo. So maybe delete finish on here 00:03:286 - then replace finish on here 00:03:479 - with clap. I think it'll sound nicer imo See hard
2. 00:12:770 (1,2) - Tbh those two doesn't interprete anything from the music, just because you want a symetry, doesn;t nean ignore the rhythm itself
3. 00:25:157 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - The use of finish sound there somewhat not fit imo, just too loud and spamy Custom samples

[Extreme]

1. 00:01:931 (1) - I guess the finish sound used on that 1/4 reverse not fit imo. So maybe delete finish on here 00:03:286 - then replace finish on here 00:03:479 - with clap. I think it'll sound nicer imo
2. 00:25:253 (1,1,1,2,1) - The use of finish sound there somewhat not fit imo, just too loud and spamy See above
3. 00:25:931 (1) - I don't hear any significant change on the music, why put slowdown there? Imo that kind of thing not good kinda ruin the whole flow The song gets quite calm here

[]
I hope it help, good luck~

Cherry Blossom wrote:

Hello, M4M from my queue.
Please, reply to this mod and tell me why you didn't change without saying "it's my style" or "there are already ranked maps with the same kind of pattern" or other reasons like this.

Note : things may have been already fixed with previous mods.

Easy

1. Don't use tickrate 2 unless there is a special purpose like using sliderticks with a custom clap for example. Use tickrate 1. Hmm, I thought it needed to be the same in all diffs O.o, but okay. It fits better

Normal

1. Same as Easy about tickrate.
2. The diff gap between this diff and Easy is too large. This current Normal diff contains a lot of 1/2 patterns whhen you can see on Easy, main patterns are 1/1 and when it's not, it's 2/1.

Hard

1. 00:11:995 (2,3,1) - This pattern is really weird to play and looks ugly due to the overlap between those sliders. To make this pattern more comfortable to play, just increase the angle between those sliders in order to get rid of this overlap. And also, there should not be a larger distance between 00:12:383 (3,1) - than 00:11:995 (2,3) - because it looks misleading to players, and they can hit this circle 00:12:770 (1) - too early or late. Did something slightly different, as this imo makes it better readable
2. 00:25:157 (1,2,3,4,5,1,1) - This pattern is unreadable. First, these circles 00:25:447 (2,3,4) - are too much spaced, and that makes this pattern really difficult to play and handle for a hard player. Plus, i don't really think that a simple hard player could read this slider 00:25:157 (1) - with the triple properly, it requires much technical skills and that's a little too much. And finally, how the player could be able to read this properly ? 00:25:834 (5,1,1) - . There is a polarity issues and that's not really easy to hit them with much accuracy, and a hard player doesn't have a lot of both accuracy and reading skills. It should be better if you unstack these circles froms the sliderend, or just find another solution. (5,1,1) was fixed with previous mod. The others are fine as this'll be the 4rth diff in the set

Insane

1. 00:25:931 (1,1) - There should be more distance between them, because the current pattern could cause readability issues due to the previous patterns that are really much spaced. For the insane, I don't want the 1/16 slider to be spaced far, cause even if they are a tad late getting there+clicking the slider might have already started causing many combobreaks, and probably a fail too

Extreme

1. 00:14:318 (1,2,3) - Why is there a jump here and not here 00:15:866 (1,2,3) - ? Imo, the jump you added looks out of place, because the next patterns are easier to handle and less spaced, and this long jump is like a spike, and that's not really appreciated. Just avoid this jump here : 00:14:318 (1,2,3) - Okay, made it a blanket
2. 00:24:189 (1,1) - A little readability issue here, i don't really expected a long jump between the slider and this stream when i was testplaying, because the first circle of this stream is stacked with this slider 00:23:899 (1) - , and the Approach rate is not enough high to be able to avoid this weird stack. I highly recommend you to unstack 00:23:899 (1,1) - because as i said, it causes some readability issues. Don't touch the AR it looks fine.

I don't mod the Extra diff because patterns look so overdone compared to what the song can provide. Aiming 310 BPM is not easy at all and overkill, and only a few players can do it. Imo this diff is unnecessary.

Good luck ~

1. 00:08:124 (1) - maybe we should put this closer to the previous since its 1/6 vs 1/4? http://puu.sh/k2V9L/caf2431e7c.jpg
2. 00:20:028 (1) - missing a finish here?
3. 00:23:028 (2,2) - try putting a little more space between these and the sliders. Its a little uncomfortably close because the player won't follow those sliders all the way down

1. 00:09:286 (7,1) - its minor but maybe we can tilt these to connect them like the other ones 00:08:124 (1,2) - 00:10:448 (6,7) -

1. 00:22:834 (4) - check the spacing here... doesn't look like it was intentional
2. 00:23:124 (5) - maybe missing a hitsound here too

1. 00:07:350 (2,3,4) - check ds
2. 00:11:608 (3,4,5,6) - not going to mirror these sliders?
3. 00:14:318 - everything is kinda shoved in the right side of the screen in this section. Maybe try changing 00:17:415 (1,2,1,2) - because they are really not that interesting right now anyway
4. 00:24:770 (5,1,2,1,1,1) - did something happen with the combo colors here lol
5. 00:25:834 (1,1) - errr I don't recommend using a double on lower diffs, I think it would sound fine if we removed it entirely actually, though you can also try http://puu.sh/k2XhK/844622b53f.jpg

1. 00:05:028 (4,5,1) - put the NC on 00:05:028 - instead
2. 00:09:673 (1) - check this slider got extended

1. 00:15:866 (1) - remove NC because this combo is just half as long as the other ones
2. 00:23:608 (4) - idk about having them mirrored like this, it implies that the music is similar... But here its not right? Idk its a stylistic thing and completely up to you. Though I do recommend NC here instead of 00:25:157 -

eeezzzeee wrote:

Hello, M4M from your queue

[Extreme]

1. 00:08:124 (1) - maybe we should put this closer to the previous since its 1/8 vs 1/4? http://puu.sh/k2V9L/caf2431e7c.jpg Due to sliderleniency, this is not hard at all
2. 00:20:028 (1) - missing a finish here?
3. 00:23:028 (2,2) - try putting a little more space between these and the sliders. Its a little uncomfortably close because the player won't follow those sliders all the way down

[Insane]
Damn why is the star rating for this so low... Harder than it looks and should be ok for a diff spread imo I thought the same

1. 00:09:286 (7,1) - its minor but maybe we can tilt these to connect them like the other ones 00:08:124 (1,2) - 00:10:448 (6,7) - It's a ctrl H, so It's fine (and a Nc, so it doesn't really fit

[Hard]
I think it would be better to read with AR 7.5 ~ 8? Small spacing + lots of overlapping makes some parts crammed
(and then we can use 6.5 ~ 7 for the Advanced)

1. 00:22:834 (4) - check the spacing here... doesn't look like it was intentional
2. 00:23:124 (5) - maybe missing a hitsound here too

[Advanced]
AR if you take the suggestion for hard

1. 00:07:350 (2,3,4) - check ds
2. 00:11:608 (3,4,5,6) - not going to mirror these sliders? Nope
3. 00:14:318 - everything is kinda shoved in the right side of the screen in this section. Maybe try changing 00:17:415 (1,2,1,2) - because they are really not that interesting right now anyway
4. 00:24:770 (5,1,2,1,1,1) - did something happen with the combo colors here lol Yeah, too lazy to fix SB, so I did a colorhax
5. 00:25:834 (1,1) - errr I don't recommend using a double on lower diffs, I think it would sound fine if we removed it entirely actually, though you can also try http://puu.sh/k2XhK/844622b53f.jpg I prefer this

[Normal]

1. 00:05:028 (4,5,1) - put the NC on 00:05:028 - instead
2. 00:09:673 (1) - check this slider got extended

[Easy]

1. 00:15:866 (1) - remove NC because this combo is just half as long as the other ones
2. 00:23:608 (4) - idk about having them mirrored like this, it implies that the music is similar... But here its not right? Idk its a stylistic thing and completely up to you. Though I do recommend NC here instead of 00:25:157 -

That's all from me, Good luck

Aldwych wrote:

Hello M4M from queue.

Yea i've already mod your map on taiko set. So now i'm going to mod std. So 30 sec for 45 sec. Probably mod 3-4 diff.

[General]

00:01:931 : I don't think that this is a legit place for withles that should be more for beat. So maybe change for finish hitsound. (I mean the begin of the slider). There is no beat sound here, only a harsh sound, making this fine

I also didn't check all your story board but sometimes you fail on your color (ex : advanced using white circles while your combo is brown)

[Easy]

00:01:931+++ : Yea you remind me your mod on dynamite, the nazi one who you told me 'put the middle of you sliders on the tick ones blablabla" There you go m8. Have a nice work! ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) LOOOOOL. That however only applies to red nodes

00:06:576 : I think you don't need to NC here. you've go 2/1 between NC on this part. Ok it sounds different with the but but meh... Also maybe you can go on the same Y as the (1) of prev combo (meaning Y = 232). Complete change in rhythm (drummroll
00:18:963 : There you can NC. Nope, keeping for consistency (and sb )
00:22:060 : Is it a legit place for 3/2 reverse slider? I don't think so you're missing a clap hitsound at 00:22:447 and a synthetizor changement. So you should go back to 1/1 reverse slider and go with another circle after. 3/2 is love
00:23:608 : You should NC here instead of after. This is a new "musically" part
00:25:157 : We can do something smoothier here. Why don't you try this? Did something else here



If you want the position just tell me. I'm just to busy right now xd

00:29:512 : Is it legit? Well i guess yes. xD

Everytime i recheck i can find a small thing. Damn.

[Normal]

Woa going for 3.5 CS while your easy has 2 and hard 4. That quite harsh. You should go for CS 3.
AR -1? Close the gap too.
Also the fact that you got a 0.40 gap on SV on E/N and 0.2 on N/Adv is weird too. But ok.

00:14:318 : This slider finish quite high. Down it a little in order to get a good line to follow with 2 & 3.
00:22:447 : Imo this circle is misplaced. Regarding on your whole map you do not put extreme "anti-flow". I mean you try to make player movement smoothy and here you go brutally down. That's not a good point. I think you should move it around 248;180 and move the last section on the same offset (i would like to say the same "décalage" :3 ).

Quite good normal. But a bit challenging compared to the easy imo. I think that putting these new setting will make it a bit easier.

[Advanced]

00:01:157 (Storyboard) : Be carefull. Your circles takes too much time to disepear compared to the others. It's also quite confusing because you're stacking many things here. Intended, actually
00:07:544 : Watch out on the DS here.
00:08:124 : I know. You know. Just be prepared to get comment on this DS. Just saying.
00:19:737 : Wow calm down here on the DS. xD
00:25:544 : Is it necessary to get storyboard approach circle here? Consistency
00:25:834 : What a fun to make NC xD
No fixes for the DS, as Advanced can have irregular spacing
I like this diff. That's nice because you've got Hard pattern style without jumps.

[Hard]

00:01:931 : Well... M'kay... i guess that's just a way to get free combo.
00:13:157 : The fact that you have nothing here is weird because in normal diff you have. Maybe get some object here? This is also valuable of advanced diff and higher.
00:23:124 : Did you failed on the DS? Because it's quite different from the other pattern.
00:24:382 : Imo the pattern is quite ugly. I mean the 4 circles and next sliders. This doesn't look like a perfect round. Maybe some rework? (Just put a circle in the middle of this and work with the approach rate).

Ok

SO i've finish what i wanted. What i could see is quite good generally but i think you did quite a lot of mistake/errors. Maybe you should recheck your self and see what's going on.

Anyway gl hf again for rank (said the same on my first mod lel).

Bearizm wrote:

M4M

Easy

00:25:157 (1,2,3) - make it look like this instead so it moves smoother? http://puu.sh/k3QLC.png

Normal

00:20:512 (1) - just make this a 1/1 slider. or make the tail of this slider soft-hitnormal because the hitnormal sounds really bad.

00:24:382 (2) - i don't think you would want a stack here. it's normal. try not to stack anything. it's only after like 2/1.

Hard

00:12:382 (3,1) - this spacing is very weird, i don't see any reason why you should space them out, it's not insane lol. keep it at 1. This reads better

00:22:834 (4) - this slider's angle is so weird for this diff, probably just me.

00:25:834 (5,1,1) - the spacing here can be deceiving since this is hard.. new players would simply think that this is a stream because of the spacing in 00:25:447 (2,3,4) -

Insane

00:19:253 (2,3) - you sure you wanna space these out? that far?

00:25:157 (1,2) - crazy spacing here... especially when 00:24:964 (9) - is facing the other way.both are intended

Extreme

00:01:931 (1) - you could be more creative here..... make use of the triple rhythms.

00:12:382 (1) - literally, i can't see anything here as the repeat symbol is covered by the stream..... xd

i can't mod this diff lol

Good luck!

Insane

1. 30 seconds? why not =w=

1. 00:15:092 (2,3) - i'd make this into slider for more easier
2. 00:25:931 (3) - move this to the left. almost off screen here

1. nope

1. nope

1. nope

1. nope

1. Check you AiMod, since there is an unsnapped slider end one
2. 00:29:463 (1) - totally, you forgot something here. other diffs end at white tick, but this one is not :p

1. d is don note
2. k is kat note
3. D is big don note
4. K is big kat note

• 
  
  Good?

• 
  
  Good~

• 
  
  *I think no need blue tick notes.
  
  *00:19:253 - move to 00:19:350 - It makes more clear for pure sounds.& for Futsuu player. & 00:19:544 - change to k. I think kkd is fit.
  
  *00:21:576 - move to 00:21:673 - It makes more clear for pure sounds.& for Futsuu player.
  
  *00:23:124 - move to 00:23:221 - ^

• 
  
  *00:08:124 - I think D is fit.because,00:09:673 (28,29) - for consistency
  
  *00:24:576 - remove.I think need little break time.
  
  *00:25:157 - change to k.because,dk kk is little hard..? so you can try kk kk.

1. Normal-hitclap has a delay of 3.5 ms. While this is not unrankable, it can still be a noticeable difference (and it's just better not to have that delay). Here is the .wav without the delay

-Nya- wrote:

M4M~

General:

1. Add widescreen support in all the diffs. You missed a few.
2. The normal-hitwhistle’s wave is shorter than 100ms which is unrankable. I suggest you try to find a different hitsound to use in its place.
   
   Picture

   
   The wave ends at approximately 0:00.075 but it has to end at 0:00.10 at least otherwise the wave is too short.
3. Change your audio lead-in to 2000ms, just to be safe.
4. There’s quite a big SV jump from Insane to Extreme of 0.60. This makes the spread a bit unbalanced imo, since the SV differences looks like this: Easy- Normal: 0.40 . . . Normal-Advanced: 0.20 . . . Advanced-Hard: 0.20 . . . Hard-Insane: 0.20 . . . Insane-Extreme: 0.60. The jump from Easy to Normal is fine cuz it’s not that big, but a sudden SV jump of 0.60 may be a problem. This is just my own opinion though. You can decide if you want to make a change there or not. I think I would suggest a SV of 2.00 or perhaps 2.20. I disagree here. Between ENAHI the rhythm changes to being more complex, but here only the SV changes, to complement the "not-change" in rhythm. Also, this diff is quite slider based to its' probably fine
5. Is maps that are shorter than 45 seconds rankable?? It is0-0

Extreme:

1. I couldn’t play this diff AT ALL. Lol. So difficult >.<
2. Check AiBat. Apparently the repeats of this slider: 00:26:705 (1) – is not snapped. I don’t know how to judge is. Perhaps it would be best if you consult an expert. It is. It's snapped to 1/32, which is seen as unsnapped. It's the same as the ranked map
3. 00:08:512 (1,2,3,4) –Personally, I think you should rather place these circles like you placed these: 00:09:286 (1,2,3,4) - 00:10:446 (1,2,3,4) - 00:10:834 (1,2,3,4) – for consistency.
4. 00:11:608 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) –etc – The placement of these circles I also don’t advise since the objects are packed so closely together that they look crammed and just confusing to play. I highly suggest you space the pattern out more so the circles can be seen more clearly.
5. 00:13:834 (2,2) –Perhaps try to stack here by moving the tail of 00:14:318 (1) – a bit higher up.
6. 00:17:802 (3,4) –Avoid their tails from slightly touching by maybe doing this instead?
   
   Picture

   
   The above placement also looks better to me overall anyways.
7. 00:18:770 (1,1) –Such a huge jump when the pause between the two objects aren’t that long . . . I know it’s an Extreme but still . . .
8. 00:22:350 (2,2,2) –Why not stack here?
9. 00:24:189 (1) –I don’t think it’s a good idea to suddenly increase the SV like that when the SV of 00:23:608 (1,1) – is quite slower. It might throw players off while playing. True, but it's a build up to the later part. However, I do see the 1.5 is inappropriate, so I made it slow
10. 00:24:382 (1) –Imo this jump is too big since a stream follows after the jump and since 00:24:189 (1) – has a higher SV.

Insane:
I don’t really have anything to say about this diff, but I guess that some of the jumps just bugs me considering how fast the rhythm is. Especially here: 00:24:770 (8,9) - 00:25:544 (4,5) Meh, sliderjumps are easy due to the leniency they have–

Hard:

1. 00:20:512 (1,2) –Why is the distance between these two objects not similar to the distance between these objects: 00:18:963 (1,2,4,5) - ? I suggest you fix the distance there for consistency and to avoid confusion while playing.
2. 00:26:221 (1,1) –I suggest you rather space these two notes out normally (even if they are NC’ed) since players (me included) might think they have to click it earlier than they actually have to. Placements like that works more in Insanes than in Hards imo.
3. 00:26:802 (1) – You managed to make the tail of this spinner completely silent in Advanced, but in this diff it’s still audible. Try to silence the tail in this diff as well.

Advanced:

1. 00:25:834 (1,1) –I would stack these two on top of each other and I think you should rather remove NC here: 00:25:834 (1) The NC is done for better readability due to it being on the blue ticks and offbeat. Becuae the claps are quite strong, a stack doesn't complement that, hence why I used a spacing –

Normal:

1. 00:26:705 (1) –Same as in Hard about the tail of the spinner that can be silenced.

Easy:

1. With the DS you currently have, most of the objects are touching each other which is not advised. In Normals it’s okay since the rhythm where the objects touch is much faster. Perhaps try a DS of 1.1X here. The entire will look much better then imo. Did something else (CS 2 is too big )
2. 00:25:931 (3) –Move this slider a bit more to the left for better flow.

Not such a bad mapset overall. I guess it’s just the Extreme that’s bugging me the most, and also the DS in Easy.

Good luck, baraatje~!

Hellow, fellow BN! I'm here because you requested a mod. _:3_>_

1. There's a hitsound which has a possible delay > 5ms "normal-hitwhistle.wav". I really don't know if this is a really big issue but try to go in hand of what ranking criteria states.

1. There's an unsnapped inherited timing point at 00:29:439 which should've been snapped to 00:29:415.
2. 00:06:576 (1) The way you gave NC to this object breaks the NC combing you manage during the whole song. The NC goes over each two big white ticks and this is not following the NC combing pattern. So It would be better if you removed the NC here to keep consistency.
3. 00:18:576 (2,3) Just a nazi suggestion, but the DS of these two objects is off by 0.01x. It would be nicer if you kept the 0.99x here as well as you did with the previous objects.
4. 00:20:512 (1,2,3) This is just a visual suggestion, but I think it would look better if you make smoother sliders rather than linear. You could've followed the sliders ends to improve the flow and made something like this.
5. 00:25:157 (1) Same NC suggestion here. I think you wanted to emphasize the instruments here, but this looks confusing for beginner players because you break the NC combing. It would make more sense if you kept the NC combing and had removed the NC over that slider.

1. HP -0.5 to have consistency with the way you increase the HP Drain time among the Diffs. Look that the Easy has in 2, Advanced on 4, Hard on 5... so it would make more sense if the Normal would have it on 3.
2. There's an unsnapped inherited timing point at 00:29:439 which should've been snapped to 00:29:415.
3. 00:06:576 (3) Just a mini-visual suggestion, but this slider looks a bit odd because most sliders are curve and smooth. Not even lineal. So what do you think about making it a little bit more curvy to keep consistency with the other sliders? For example.
4. 00:09:479 (3) This finish here sounds weird and doesn't fit properly here. I think you're doing well emphasizing the sliders' head with a finish hitsound at every white tick. The fact of placing finishes at the red ticks is a bit odd and sounds overset. I highly suggest to replace the finish with another hitsound that let players realize that the important beats are the sliders. What about a whistle? Consider doing the same with this circle 00:11:028 (3) | As well as you did it here 00:14:318 (1,2,3) and here 00:15:866 (1,2,3)
5. 00:12:770 (1) Shouldn't this circle have a finish instead of a clap as long as you place finish at each white bid ticks?
6. 00:20:512 (1) This slider is pretty weird. Despite knowing there's no sound at the tail it seems it is missing something to be complete. I think it would flow better if you made a 1/1 slider and emphasizing the white end tick with a clap or a whistle with the auto sample set.

1. AR -1 to have consistency with the increasing of Approach Rate among the difficulties and reducing the velocity of the incoming objects in this diff. AR 7 is a bit high for this 2.61 stars that had fit better over 6. Notice that the Easy has it on 2, Normal on 4, Hard on 8... so it would make more sense if this diff kept on 6.
2. OD - 5. Does it change something by setting the OD over 5.5? I think it would make stuffs easier in the spinner at the end if the OD was 5.
3. 00:04:253 (3,4) Just a minor suggestion here, but the distance snap between these objects is off by 0.01x. /u\ You know you can make this square polygon perfect in the functions of the editor. :3
4. 00:07:544 (3,4) Same distance snap problem. But this one is very notable and you can separate them a bit more.
5. 00:09:673 (1,2,3) The distance between the 00:10:253 (2,3) and the 00:09:673 (1,2) isn't the same. It would look better if you keep the same DS among these objects to improve visually the patterns.
6. 00:09:673 (1,2) Remove the clap here. It sounds very over-hitsounded and would make more sense if it were only the finish to keep the finish combing you managed before.
7. 00:16:641 (3,1) A very nazi suggestion here, but you can improve the blanket among these objects to improve the visually flow here. Like this.
8. 00:18:190 (2,1) Same here. It doesn't hurt to make a neat look of these sliders to reduce the almost-overlap of these sliders. For example.
9. 00:23:608 (1) This slider is very curvy and doesn't fit properly here. I guess the grade of curve of that slider is very high compared to the rest of the other sliders. It would look visually better if you try out something smoother like this.
10. 00:26:705 (1) I highly suggest to remove this circle as long as the rest of the difficulties make start the spinner here 00:26:705

1. 00:06:964 (2,3,4) Consider to make the distance space between these objects bigger as well as you did here 00:06:576 (1,2)
2. 00:11:995 (2,3) These two current sliders don't fir properly with the instruments here. Because there's no important beats to be emphasized on the blue tick 00:12:286 where the main beats goes over the red tick. It would make more sense if you emphasized this beat by reducing the length of the slider (2? until here 00:12:189 and making a 1/4 that makes emphasis on the blue ticks as the song suggests. Like this.
3. 00:21:770 (6) Rhythmically talking, this two sliders fit perfectly here but the flow is not good. You made players go into a hard and non-perceptive flow that mislead the purpose with those 1/4 sliders, which I think they would flow better if you did Ctrl + G'ed this slider 00:21:770 (6) to improve the flow of this pattern.
4. 00:24:770 (6,7) You might need to make this circles audible as long as the flow is awkward to follow. The song doesn't emphasize the red and white ticks well and it would be better if you placed a whistle or a clap. A 1/2 slider would fit better here imo.

HappyRocket88 wrote:

Hellow, fellow BN! I'm here because you requested a mod. _:3_>_
[ General]

1. There's a hitsound which has a possible delay > 5ms "normal-hitwhistle.wav". I really don't know if this is a really big issue but try to go in hand of what ranking criteria states. Uhmm. Already changed it, a few days ago ;w;
   According to AutoMod it's fine, I'll check it again later O.o

[ Easy]

1. There's an unsnapped inherited timing point at 00:29:439 which should've been snapped to 00:29:415. Snapped to :512, so the first spinner in unsilenced (which is why it's snapped to 1/16
2. 00:06:576 (1) The way you gave NC to this object breaks the NC combing you manage during the whole song. The NC goes over each two big white ticks and this is not following the NC combing pattern. So It would be better if you removed the NC here to keep consistency.
3. 00:18:576 (2,3) Just a nazi suggestion, but the DS of these two objects is off by 0.01x. It would be nicer if you kept the 0.99x here as well as you did with the previous objects.
4. 00:20:512 (1,2,3) This is just a visual suggestion, but I think it would look better if you make smoother sliders rather than linear. You could've followed the sliders ends to improve the flow and made something like this.
5. 00:25:157 (1) Same NC suggestion here. I think you wanted to emphasize the instruments here, but this looks confusing for beginner players because you break the NC combing. It would make more sense if you kept the NC combing and had removed the NC over that slider. I really want to keep this actually, because of the emphasis

[ Normal]

1. HP -0.5 to have consistency with the way you increase the HP Drain time among the Diffs. Look that the Easy has in 2, Advanced on 4, Hard on 5... so it would make more sense if the Normal would have it on 3.
2. There's an unsnapped inherited timing point at 00:29:439 which should've been snapped to 00:29:415.
3. 00:06:576 (3) Just a mini-visual suggestion, but this slider looks a bit odd because most sliders are curve and smooth. Not even lineal. So what do you think about making it a little bit more curvy to keep consistency with the other sliders? For example.
4. 00:09:479 (3) This finish here sounds weird and doesn't fit properly here. I think you're doing well emphasizing the sliders' head with a finish hitsound at every white tick. The fact of placing finishes at the red ticks is a bit odd and sounds overset. I highly suggest to replace the finish with another hitsound that let players realize that the important beats are the sliders. What about a whistle? Consider doing the same with this circle 00:11:028 (3) | As well as you did it here 00:14:318 (1,2,3) and here 00:15:866 (1,2,3)
5. 00:12:770 (1) Shouldn't this circle have a finish instead of a clap as long as you place finish at each white bid ticks?
6. 00:20:512 (1) This slider is pretty weird. Despite knowing there's no sound at the tail it seems it is missing something to be complete. I think it would flow better if you made a 1/1 slider and emphasizing the white end tick with a clap or a whistle with the auto sample set.

[ Advanced]

1. AR -1 to have consistency with the increasing of Approach Rate among the difficulties and reducing the velocity of the incoming objects in this diff. AR 7 is a bit high for this 2.61 stars that had fit better over 6. Notice that the Easy has it on 2, Normal on 4, Hard on 8... so it would make more sense if this diff kept on 6.
2. OD - 5. Does it change something by setting the OD over 5.5? I think it would make stuffs easier in the spinner at the end if the OD was 5.
3. 00:04:253 (3,4) Just a minor suggestion here, but the distance snap between these objects is off by 0.01x. /u\ You know you can make this square polygon perfect in the functions of the editor. :3 LOOOOL. But I used that ;___;
4. 00:07:544 (3,4) Same distance snap problem. But this one is very notable and you can separate them a bit more.
5. 00:09:673 (1,2,3) The distance between the 00:10:253 (2,3) and the 00:09:673 (1,2) isn't the same. It would look better if you keep the same DS among these objects to improve visually the patterns.
6. 00:09:673 (1,2) Remove the clap here. It sounds very over-hitsounded and would make more sense if it were only the finish to keep the finish combing you managed before. I'm just following the music
7. 00:16:641 (3,1) A very nazi suggestion here, but you can improve the blanket among these objects to improve the visually flow here. Like this.
8. 00:18:190 (2,1) Same here. It doesn't hurt to make a neat look of these sliders to reduce the almost-overlap of these sliders. For example.
9. 00:23:608 (1) This slider is very curvy and doesn't fit properly here. I guess the grade of curve of that slider is very high compared to the rest of the other sliders. It would look visually better if you try out something smoother like this.
10. 00:26:705 (1) I highly suggest to remove this circle as long as the rest of the difficulties make start the spinner here 00:26:705

[ Hard]

1. 00:06:964 (2,3,4) Consider to make the distance space between these objects bigger as well as you did here 00:06:576 (1,2)
2. 00:11:995 (2,3) These two current sliders don't fir properly with the instruments here. Because there's no important beats to be emphasized on the blue tick 00:12:286 where the main beats goes over the red tick. It would make more sense if you emphasized this beat by reducing the length of the slider (2? until here 00:12:189 and making a 1/4 that makes emphasis on the blue ticks as the song suggests. Like this.
3. 00:21:770 (6) Rhythmically talking, this two sliders fit perfectly here but the flow is not good. You made players go into a hard and non-perceptive flow that mislead the purpose with those 1/4 sliders, which I think they would flow better if you did Ctrl + G'ed this slider 00:21:770 (6) to improve the flow of this pattern.
4. 00:24:770 (6,7) You might need to make this circles audible as long as the flow is awkward to follow. The song doesn't emphasize the red and white ticks well and it would be better if you placed a whistle or a clap. A 1/2 slider would fit better here imo.

[]
I couldn't pass the harder difficulties. /u\ Nice map! Despite osu! has an already ranked version, I liked more the creativity of this map. Good job!

HappyRocket88 wrote:

Sorry for the late >w<

[ Easy]

1. As I said in the last mod, 00:22:060 (3) this slider's reverse doesn't fit properly here because there's no sound to emphasize over here 00:22:641 . Besides, it breaks the 1/1 you managed during the whole set. So It would have a better rhythm if you try out to keep 1/1 notes. For example.
2. 00:23:608 (1) Remove the whistle on this slider's head. It's very noisy and seems to be overset. I think it would rather be only with the whistle of the slider's reverse. That one sound really nice imo.
3. 00:26:899 (1,1) o_o Irreversible, I choose you! Now, use broken kokoro.

[ Normal]

1. 00:13:157 (2) The current clap over this slider's head sound a bit weird, because there's no beat to be emphasized at this section. Try to remove it as long as you followed the instruments in the next slider 00:13:544 (3) Actually there is a loud sound which sounds like a clap, thus it fits. It may feel weird, as there is no beat, but I'm using it to accentuate the highpitched sound here
2. 00:23:608 (1) Remove the whistle. It sound really over-set and it doesn't make sense if you were placing whistles on every slider's reverse.

[ Advanced]

1. Unsnapped green line at 00:29:439. You should snap it on 00:29:415 It's suppoesed to be later, so the end of the first spinner isn't silenced, changed it thou
2. 00:18:190 (2,1) Just a mini visual suggestion, but you can make a neater blanket imo. The current sliders almost touch each other and look odd. What about this?

[ Hard]

1. Unsnapped green line at 00:29:439. You should snap it on 00:29:415 Snapped to 1/16
2. 00:22:834 (4) This slider doesn't play bad, but I think it could have flowed better if you tried to make a slider which players can notice when starts and ends. Like this.
3. 00:24:963 (7) Remove the clap here. I think it's really unnecessary because you already emphasized the strong beat on 00:25:157 (1) one.

[ Insane]

1. OD - 1 Better to have consistency with the standard incresing of OD among the diffs. (Hard = 6) (Extra = 8) So it would make sense if the OD of this diff be 7.
2. Unsnapped green line at 00:29:439. You should snap it on 00:29:415
3. 00:12:770 (1) You could make an interrogation mark for a neater slider here. Like this.
4. 00:21:286 (5,7) The current overlap here plays a bit weird. The hidden stack just makes this pattern hard to read. It would be better if you do something similar as you did in the previous patterns 00:19:737 (5,6,7) or 00:18:189 (5,6,7) . What about this? Consider doing something similar in this pattern 00:22:834 (5,6,7)

[ Extreme]

1. HP 7 maybe? The drain time is very short and I don't think this would be a problem for players.
2. 00:15:092 (1,2,1,2,1) this pattern was really hard to play. I think that the problem resides of the spacing. Take account that this section is mapped on 1/4 ticks and the way you give flow to this section isn't really intuitive.
3. 00:20:899 (3,4) The way you made a jump here doesn't play bad, but I think it would flow better if you do Ctrl + G over those two sliders.

Call me back! (•_•) ( •_•)>¬■-■ (¬■_■)

1. 00:22:060 (3) - This object is offscreen.
2. 00:20:124 (4) - idk if it's me but the circles here are really close to ech other! consider to space them!
3. 00:29:512 (1) - Second spinner is starting really quickly here lol : next 1/4 tick. I'd suggest you to begin that spinner at 00:29:608 -

1. 00:11:028 (3,2,3,1) - That parallelogramm shaped pattern could be much better. Work on the visual aspect next time
2. 00:22:834 (3,1,2) - That transition looks really weird and 00:23:608 (1) - 's location didn't really follow the shape of the curve of 00:22:834 (3) - sooo that's weird imo.
3. 00:29:512 (1) - Same thing about Easy diff.

1. 00:05:028 (1,2) - Extend'em on the nexxt white tick. It feel weird otherwise
2. 00:07:350 (2) - Blanket 0/10
3. 00:15:866 (1,2) - Only suggesting something here: I'd say that u can remove the red anchors , aesthetic is rly bad imo.

1. 00:01:931 (1) - Noticed that some ripples appear in the screen when you press a circle or a slider. Here , there's only a slider-repeat and we can notice that there's some ripples appearing from nowhere. This is really inconsistent if you compare with the other diffs.
2. 00:22:834 (4,5) - Not really consistent here : A slider with a red anchor followed by a basic curved slider. Felt like you placed these sliders randomly. I'm sure you can fix it by your own!
3. 00:23:608 (1,2) - Same here but it's a lil more important because asthetic of 00:23:608 (1) - is really weird and random imo.

1. 00:01:931 (1) - same as before
2. 00:11:221 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - How the hell are we supposed to read that with a perfect accuracy ? damn xD
3. 00:26:705 (1) - Why 1/16 here?lol. You have the same thing as the beginner so why did you add 1/16 beat snap divisor here? not consistent at all

1. Apply the first and last thing mentionned in Insane aswell here!
2. 00:15:382 (1,2,1) - This is awful to read I'm sorry..

Baraatje123 wrote:

Thanks!
In extreme it's a 1/32 (which is why it gives unsnaps in AutoMod)
This is also used in the ranked version, so it's not unrankable or such (Fanzhen's diff I believe)
This is also why I used 1:/16 in Insane, also used in the ranked one (Angelhoney IIRC)

Baraatje123 wrote:

Oh wait, you're right
AHO used 1/8, fanzhen 1/16, the difference is what caught me ;w;
Still, there is nothing in the RC that says anything about 1/32 snappings, so I'm sure it's fine
About the 300 hit, It's already a really hard diff, and quite short. It's not a pain to redo it, as it happens at 26 seconds (with a 1/2 break between the notes here as well, making it perfectly fine to read) I never once missclicked this when playing it (in 10-20 times)

1. 00:01:737 - How about adding a circle here to emphasize the relatively strong beat here? Up to you, though.
2. 00:06:576 (1,1) - These NC's are fine, but you should remove 00:07:737 (3) - this one because it's in the flow with those. I know what you tried to create (NC every downbeat), but it feels better the way I'm suggesting it.
3. 00:10:834 (1,2,3,4) - I'd move this combo a bit closer to the other stream, to maintain consistency between these patterns. If you compare, the spacing on the rest is quite a bit smaller.
4. 00:11:415 (2,2,2) - It's personal experience, but from what I've seen / played / heard, sharp angles play way better with these patterns, so why not going with : http://puu.sh/l4GQU/d7bbc7c890.jpg
5. 00:13:544 (1,2,3) - This rhythm can be indicated better with 1) higher spacing 2) equal spacing.
   Now the kiai, it generally is okay but the thing is you try to create speed and then go with really close spacing, in my honest opinion there is potential in this part, but we need to get there eventually.
6. 00:14:705 (3,4,1) - First example, those three objects. It's okay, but if you think about it, movement is almost 0 here. You don't have to go to any end of the sliders, and the starts of the sliders are so close together, in conclusion, you only made a weird shaped triangle here.
7. 00:15:576 (2,1) - Another thing is emphasis, where does the huge jump come from here, but you got such a small jump 00:15:673 (1,1) - here, where it should emphasize ?
8. 00:15:673 - I also suggest to remove all those single NCs because they just look completely out of place, being the only combo around. It fits for the combo before anyways.
9. 00:16:931 (1,1) - why the sudden decrease of spacing?
10. 00:18:189 (1,2,1,2,1,1,2,1,2,1,1,2,1,2) - talked to you ingame about this
11. 00:23:028 (2,2) - are you aware of that you've put a decreased spacing with each slider here? there are placements which play better imo >_<
12. 00:24:189 (1) - hahaha no, 1/8 (if even) or something but not 1/16
13. Re-check the NCing and the flow in general please
    

Irreversible wrote:

Hey baraatje, I found some stuff I wanted to discuss about;

DISTORTION

1. 00:01:737 - How about adding a circle here to emphasize the relatively strong beat here? Up to you, though.
2. 00:06:576 (1,1) - These NC's are fine, but you should remove 00:07:737 (3) - this one because it's in the flow with those. I know what you tried to create (NC every downbeat), but it feels better the way I'm suggesting it.
3. 00:10:834 (1,2,3,4) - I'd move this combo a bit closer to the other stream, to maintain consistency between these patterns. If you compare, the spacing on the rest is quite a bit smaller.
4. 00:11:415 (2,2,2) - It's personal experience, but from what I've seen / played / heard, sharp angles play way better with these patterns, so why not going with : http://puu.sh/l4GQU/d7bbc7c890.jpg
5. 00:13:544 (1,2,3) - This rhythm can be indicated better with 1) higher spacing 2) equal spacing.
   Now the kiai, it generally is okay but the thing is you try to create speed and then go with really close spacing, in my honest opinion there is potential in this part, but we need to get there eventually.
6. 00:14:705 (3,4,1) - First example, those three objects. It's okay, but if you think about it, movement is almost 0 here. You don't have to go to any end of the sliders, and the starts of the sliders are so close together, in conclusion, you only made a weird shaped triangle here.
7. 00:15:576 (2,1) - Another thing is emphasis, where does the huge jump come from here, but you got such a small jump 00:15:673 (1,1) - here, where it should emphasize ?
8. 00:15:673 - I also suggest to remove all those single NCs because they just look completely out of place, being the only combo around. It fits for the combo before anyways.
9. 00:16:931 (1,1) - why the sudden decrease of spacing? The pitch here is much lower then in the previous parts, thus a lower DS feels in place
10. 00:18:189 (1,2,1,2,1,1,2,1,2,1,1,2,1,2) - talked to you ingame about this
11. 00:23:028 (2,2) - are you aware of that you've put a decreased spacing with each slider here? there are placements which play better imo >_<
12. 00:24:189 (1) - hahaha no, 1/8 (if even) or something but not 1/16
13. Re-check the NCing and the flow in general please
    

About the other diffs, they sometimes have weird NCing, currenty talking to you about that in game.

Good luck with further processing!

1. 00:05:028 (1,2,3) - Not sure but the pattern seems quite random to me. I think it should at least be symmetry. You could try to make 00:05:802 (2) - is on the line x:256 and 00:06:576 (3) - has same y-coordinate as 00:05:028 (1) -
2. 00:13:544 (2,1) - Suggestion: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3899570 and https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3899573
3. 00:18:963 (3) - Should Ctrl+H for better design and flow

1. 00:01:931 (1,2,3) - Not sure whether this is rankable + not a good symmetry pattern with connecting heads and tails tbh
2. 00:05:028 (1,2,3) - The note placement is too random. You could try connecting 00:05:028 (1,2) - to form a slider and add circle at 00:06:189 - to form sth like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3899635 and https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3899637
3. 00:08:124 (1,2) - Might be better if you remove the curvature of the sliders to improve both 00:07:737 (5,1) - and 00:08:899 (2,3,1) - at the same time
4. 00:16:641 (3) - hasn't faded away completely but 00:18:190 (2) - appears, making like the sliders are crashing into each other
5. 00:25:157 (1) - The claps in the slider seems not necessary
   Should polish more in the note placement and design for the diff imo

1. 00:07:737 (4) - Should reverse the slider until 00:08:028 - imo
2. 00:18:963 (1,2) - A really uncomfortable distance change tbh
3. 00:25:834 (1,1) - It would be a lot less confusing if you stack them together and remove the NC of 00:25:834 (1) -

1. 00:13:157 - Should add a note here
2. 00:11:995 (2,3,1) - The distance is different compared to the notes b4
3. 00:13:544 (2,3,4) - imo making the notes as a single slider would emphasize better + improve in flow eg. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3899768
4. 00:25:447 (2,3,4,5,1) - Suggestion: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3899784

1. 00:05:028 (1,2) - It feels so blank at this part lel why not making them into 1/1 sliders as Hard
2. 00:13:544 (2,3,4) - As stated in Hard why should be made into a slider. Optional tho
3. 00:23:608 (1,2) - idk

• 
  Distort = pervert ALRIGHT ALRIGHT ALRIGHT VERY WELL
  Alright I distorted you with this mod very well ya I mislead you very well tho

1. Why not place both 00:05:415 (2,3,4) - and 00:06:189 (2,3,4) - at x:256 y:320 for more fun flow
2. 00:10:446 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - The flow seems not smooth enough tho
3. 00:13:157 - Should add a note here
4. 00:13:544 (1,2,3) - As mentioned in hard why it should be made a slider. It brings out similar #feels represented as in 00:25:931 (1) - imo. Still optional

HootOwlStar wrote:

*Random mod pops out from nowhere*
Mod this beatmap set because why not
Mostly suggestions + stuffs according to personal tho

[Easy]

1. 00:05:028 (1,2,3) - Not sure but the pattern seems quite random to me. I think it should at least be symmetry. You could try to make 00:05:802 (2) - is on the line x:256 and 00:06:576 (3) - has same y-coordinate as 00:05:028 (1) - It's a stack with 00:08:124 (1) -
2. 00:13:544 (2,1) - Suggestion: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3899570 and https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3899573 This flows better
3. 00:18:963 (3) - Should Ctrl+H for better design and flow Nope, it starts with circular flow at first, and becomes straight flow

[Normal]

1. 00:01:931 (1,2,3) - Not sure whether this is rankable + not a good symmetry pattern with connecting heads and tails tbh It's fine
2. 00:05:028 (1,2,3) - The note placement is too random. You could try connecting 00:05:028 (1,2) - to form a slider and add circle at 00:06:189 - to form sth like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3899635 and https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3899637 I actually prefer my "random" placement
3. 00:08:124 (1,2) - Might be better if you remove the curvature of the sliders to improve both 00:07:737 (5,1) - and 00:08:899 (2,3,1) - at the same time
4. 00:16:641 (3) - hasn't faded away completely but 00:18:190 (2) - appears, making like the sliders are crashing into each other
5. 00:25:157 (1) - The claps in the slider seems not necessary
   Should polish more in the note placement and design for the diff imo

[Advanced]

1. 00:07:737 (4) - Should reverse the slider until 00:08:028 - imo
2. 00:18:963 (1,2) - A really uncomfortable distance change tbh
3. 00:25:834 (1,1) - It would be a lot less confusing if you stack them together and remove the NC of 00:25:834 (1) -

[Hard]

1. 00:13:157 - Should add a note here Doesn't really fit imo
2. 00:11:995 (2,3,1) - The distance is different compared to the notes b4
3. 00:13:544 (2,3,4) - imo making the notes as a single slider would emphasize better + improve in flow eg. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3899768 imo circles emphasize more then sliders)
4. 00:25:447 (2,3,4,5,1) - Suggestion: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3899784 I prefer movement

[Insane]

1. 00:05:028 (1,2) - It feels so blank at this part lel why not making them into 1/1 sliders as Hard It's fine. On hard it gives a bit weird feeling, which are fine if those feeling miss in insane
2. 00:13:544 (2,3,4) - As stated in Hard why should be made into a slider. Optional tho nope
3. 00:23:608 (1,2) - idk BEST MOD LINE EVER

[Distortion]

• 
  Distort = pervert ALRIGHT ALRIGHT ALRIGHT VERY WELL
  Alright I distorted you with this mod very well ya I mislead you very well tho

1. Why not place both 00:05:415 (2,3,4) - and 00:06:189 (2,3,4) - at x:256 y:320 for more fun flow I prefer this stack
2. 00:10:446 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - The flow seems not smooth enough tho It's fine for streams like this
3. 00:13:157 - Should add a note here nah
4. 00:13:544 (1,2,3) - As mentioned in hard why it should be made a slider. It brings out similar #feels represented as in 00:25:931 (1) - imo. Still optional nah

I tried ya but I started to be pointing out optional stuffs too much as I really can't pass since Hard lel
Anyway good luck tho
Using tho instead of though becos why not idk yay

markenergie wrote:

congrats on the qualification! ( now a noob question C: what is left to be done when its qualified? just some public testing see how it is for people? )

1. 00:07:544 (2,3) I don't know why the distance of those notes is smaller than these 00:07:350 (1,2) when all of them are strong beats. It would be better if you placed 3 here 256|348 to make a fancy triangle here
   
2. 00:09:286 (1,2,3,4) The placement of these object isn't really intuitive due the curve of the previous stream. It woudl be better if you placed them like thisto improve significantly the flow.
3. 00:14:608 (2,3) should be unstacked as well as you did here 00:16:157 (2,3)
4. 00:21:576 (2) This should be a circle and a note to give variety to the patterning. It's quite boring using the same 1/1 slider and 3/4 slider in the whole kiai.