At your request (sorta):
General
That 2012 style www
Saw the earlier discussion, metadata should be fine as is. The official website, Spotify, and iTunes all use "The Super Happy Fun Club". On the SoundCloud page, they have in their user description this name as well, so obviously it's the one they want to use.
Your BPM is doubled. You can tell at the kiai where the upbeat is very clearly landing on the 3rd white tick instead of the second one like it should be. Also in general the measures are more logical with BPM 97 (vocals line up better, etc.).
Also, even though the leading 1/4 are anacruses, you still need to have a red timing section for those notes; at the moment they're technically unsnapped objects (you can tell this by watching the metronome in the timing section, it's not bouncing back and forth like it should be). Thus, the timing should be:
261,618.556701030928,4,1,1,60,1,0
1188,618.556701030928,4,3,1,70,1,0
10776,618.556701030928,4,1,1,60,1,0
93028,618.556701030928,3,3,1,70,1,0
94882,618.556701030928,4,1,1,75,1,1
151171,618.556701030928,3,3,1,70,1,0
151789,618.556701030928,4,3,1,70,1,0
(The rest of the mod will be using the timing you have in place right now, sorry if things get confusing, I only caught the doubled BPM after having modded most of the Insane already ^^' )
---
Insane
00:02:735 (1,2,3,4) - Can you think of a different pattern? The stacking emphasizes 1 and 3 much more than 2 and 4, which doesn't fit with your previous square pattern, where the emphasis was uniform. (Also personally I don't think this plays very well when coming out of the 2/1 gaps but that could just be me)
00:05:209 (1,2,3,4) - ^
00:10:467 (1,2,3,4) - The instrumental has a triplet starting at 3, and nothing at 1 or 2. This rhythm choice is really weird. (Also this doesn't flow very well. After playing the triplet you have to speed your hand up to hit 4. Since the circles are all placed on the same line, this is jerky and unrewarding)
Perhaps consider adding a triplet at 00:15:570, as well as any similar areas?
I'd prefer if 00:29:488 (3) - was stacked on 00:29:642 (1) - instead of where it is now, since these two beats are more connected together.
00:37:992 (1) - Should be a 1/2 or even 1/1 slider, the gap in the timeline here is super awkward since the vocals are still smoothly flowing through. Save the gaps for places with more finality, like 00:40:467 (1) - (or even 00:38:921 (5) - works rather well).
00:46:653 (5,6,7,8) - The star pattern created a very centralized flow pattern, and the 5,6,7 angle is very disjointed from that, a better solution would be to angle the triangle back towards the star's center, like
this.
00:49:282 (7) -
this will flow better into 00:49:745 (1,2) - I think. (It also looks nicer lol)
01:04:282 (1,2,3) - Space these evenly, the emphasis should more or less be the same here.
01:21:601 (6,7,8) - Space these out like 00:46:962 (6,7,8) - , the overlaps here never appeared previously and only serve to make playing this part unrewarding. You're basically not moving your cursor at all here.
01:22:220 (9,1) - Rather minor point, but this type of anti-flow is very uncharacteristic of this map so far, having something like this make its first appearance halfway through your map for no rhyme or reason leaves your map feeling incohesive.
01:22:838 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - The drum roll starts here, at 01:22:838. I'm sure you're going for some sort of build-up effect here but that can be accomplished better. Furthermore, the repeated sliders are really poorly placed on the timeline. If you put the heads on the white ticks, this will be more rewarding. Your rhythm choice right now is making 01:23:457 (4,5) - the most "intense" part of this drumroll, since it's the only part where the player clicks at 1/2 interval; everywhere else, the player is pressing down at 1/1 time.
01:33:955 (1,2,3) - Once again, space these evenly.
01:40:448 (4) -
this would play smoother out of the 2,3 angle and also link up better to 5.
01:51:273 (6,7,8) - Similar to before,
this is an arrangement that plays better out of the star pattern as it retains the centralized nature of a star pattern.
02:08:902 (6,7,8,9,1) - b-but why, this verse of the song is the least intense compared to everything else, and now you're breaking out the large spaced 1/2 stars?
02:24:057 (7,8,9,10,1) - Sure this is interesting, but the rotational jumps beforehand imply a sort of curved motion throughout, which this is ignoring; this is actually really unfun and flowbreaking. You could probably get away with
this, but I think the best course of action would be to try a different pattern altogether, something like
this is super intuitive and flows really well, while hopefully giving off a similar effect to what you're looking for.
If 2011/2012 style is what you're going for, I think you did a pretty good job; everything flows really well for the most part and things are actually still pretty visually interesting (00:24:230 (6,7) - made me giggle).
If 2012 style is NOT what you're going for, feel free to message me and I'll try to teach you how to
actually make a good map make a map more akin to the current generation <3
---
Hard
00:32:581 (6,7) - Strange rhythm choice, I really think you should try to map the white tick here in some way.
01:05:056 (7) - I think you should delete this note. The repeated slider actually maps the vocal here in an implicit manner, and this note causes a lot of flow issues where it is. If you do keep it, try to make the 6,7,1 angles less sharp.
02:33:025 (3) - lol nice
There is a lot of tricky single-tap in this diff, but idk shit about spread balance so yolo
---
Normal
00:49:745 (3) - If you curve this slider like
so, it'll play nicer into 4 (also looks nicer). You could also try to angle the slider more if you want to keep it straight. I bring this up because right now 4 just seems sort of awkwardly tacked on instead of being cohesive with 3.
01:44:160 (5,3) - As you can see
here, these sliders are overlapping in a very unappealing way. Tiny overlaps like this give the impression that this difficulty was hastily composed. Try to fix this if you can.
02:33:335 (2,3) -
This rhythm will fit better here, it'll bring the vocals more in line with how they worked at 02:31:789 (1) - , and give a better emphasis to 02:34:262.
---
Easy
Nothing to say here, good job!
---
Hope I explained myself properly/everything made sense, let me know if you have any questions or if I worded things poorly. Good luck with ranking, hope I helped!