1. Easy (1.34 stars, 61 notes)
2. Hard (3.26 stars, 169 notes)
3. Insane (4.55 stars, 228 notes)
4. Normal (2.06 stars, 124 notes)

1. 00:28:542 (1) Move it a bit further away from (2) like you do for similar patterns in the later part?
2. 00:37:718 (2) Just keep it curved like the others?
3. 00:40:895 (5) and 00:43:718 (4) are not stacked but 00:45:130 (5) is? In my opinion I feel stacking is okay here as it isn't too confusing
4. 01:00:659 (5,6) The spacing actually becomes smaller compared with 00:59:953 (2,3), make it bigger like u do for 01:01:365 (8,9)
5. 01:08:071 (1) and 01:09:482 (5) is another example: one is curved while another one has similar shape but is linear
6. 01:16:542 Green tick is not snapped should be 01:16:541 instead, plus the slider is a bit ugly. Maybe this instead? http://i.imgur.com/aocUwZS.jpg

Faygor wrote:

hello NM~

InsaneGood map~
However during the kiai time you use curved sliders sometimes but other times u decided to use sliders with red point to achieve the same bended effect. I don't see any coherent patterns regarding your use and neither can I identify any significant changes in rhythm: http://i.imgur.com/ixyE3GA.jpg il don't see the huge deal as to why the sliders have to be the same. idk i just like to vary sliders in my maps.

1. 00:28:542 (1) Move it a bit further away from (2) like you do for similar patterns in the later part? this section is noticeably calmer than the later part, so i decided to use lower spacing
2. 00:37:718 (2) Just keep it curved like the others? nah it looks fine
3. 00:40:895 (5) and 00:43:718 (4) are not stacked but 00:45:130 (5) is? In my opinion I feel stacking is okay here as it isn't too confusing
4. 01:00:659 (5,6) The spacing actually becomes smaller compared with 00:59:953 (2,3), make it bigger like u do for 01:01:365 (8,9)
5. 01:08:071 (1) and 01:09:482 (5) is another example: one is curved while another one has similar shape but is linear changed 01:08:071 (1), not the other one tho
6. 01:16:542 Green tick is not snapped should be 01:16:541 instead, plus the slider is a bit ugly. Maybe this instead? http://i.imgur.com/aocUwZS.jpg chnaged it but not ur suggestion

good job and good luck!

Juiceys wrote:

Insane:

00:37:012 (1,2,3) - I'm not sure why the vocals are mapped here. They aren't prominent enough to justify mapping to them and there are perfectly fine instrumental noises you could map here instead. Mapping the vocals seems pointless and it makes the map flow weird imo due to popular demand i did it

00:43:718 (4,1,5,1) - Make these both perfect, or imperfect stacks, keeps the map consistent and cleaner, making them different even though the sounds they're mapped to are similar is pointless

The Kiai: The volume level stays consistent throughout the entire kiai, So if you want to implement higher DS you should do it ONLY on the prominent drum noises in this song, which you do for the most part, but if you don't do it for all of them such as

00:56:777 (1) - The sliderend
00:58:189 (1) - ^

And when you map this sound, it should be a higher DS than the notes around it to emphasize this sound

01:07:718 (5) - Here the jump should be larger because of the drum jump is large enough i think
01:09:130 (4) - Jump to this note should be larger than the jump to 01:08:777 (3) - can't make it larger

Short mod, Hope it helped! good luck

My Angel Kanan wrote:

hi


[General]

Maybe consider add a easy? your normal uses a lot of 1/2 and 3-4 circles in a row which is pretty hard (for noobs). I can make one if you want xd hmu

[Normal]

00:10:894 (4) - This is a bit too close at 3 move it to 230|348
00:48:306 (1,2,3,4,5) - too hard for a normal could use some 1/1 slider it's the peak tho
idk actually the diff is pretty okay I just dislike the concept with 3-4 Circles in a row and the most curved slider which could be just straight ones my style consists of weird sliders lo

no kds

Naotoshi wrote:

[insane]
00:06:483 (2,3,4) - 1/1 slider here would be nice since it's the next note from 00:05:953 (1) - imo following drums tho

00:07:012 (5,6) - much better as a 1/1 slider here, since it matches to 00:05:953 (1) - in the song

00:16:894 (3) - imo this 1 should be a pretty high spacing jump, highest pitch and all that

00:27:836 (1,2,3) - 4 circles? you put 4 circles on this in the intro

00:39:836 (1,2,3,4,5) - here i think there should be a more dramatic change in something; sv, spacing, whateever, but this part is really different from earlier so highlighting that contrast is cute how about all of them

00:52:189 (5,6) - making all of these 5s into 1/1 sliders could be nice. you'd highlight the fact that it's an extended vocal a lot more. would kinda derail from the rhythm i had

00:57:306 (2,3) - 1/1 slider?

00:58:718 (2,3) - same
highlighting cute vocals is nice

01:00:659 (5,6,7) - u could do some mad edgy rhythm following the background piano like http://puu.sh/wMMZL/bd049d827c.jpg xd but muh important drum sounds

01:06:659 (1) - random 1 combo nc? lol

01:08:600 (2,3) - these ones too, ctrl g or 1/1 slider is really nice

[hard]
00:06:483 (2,3) - at least on hard, definitely good to put 1/1 here.

00:33:835 (9,1) - unrankable pixel overlap

00:41:248 (5,6) - you could follow the offbeat vocals here to make the section more unique i like the rhythm right now

00:56:777 (1) - uhh the vocal here is pretty clear on the red tick at 00:57:305 - , making 2 1/1s here definitely fits more don't want to ignore the important drum sounds tho

[normal]
ok i like the normal xd

1. why 2 red points? just make one on 00:04:542 -
2. aimod

1. 00:58:188 (1,2) - too close visually
2. 01:16:541 (2) - nc for sv change?

1. 00:08:070 (4,5,1) - make (1) a bit further from (4) and (5), visual distance
2. 00:34:541 (2,4) - 00:52:894 (5,7) - 00:33:482 (3,1) - 00:54:482 (2,4) - too close
3. 00:59:600 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this place feels a bit too difficult imo. jumps, high object density

1. 00:45:482 (1,3) - it looks meh
2. 00:59:600 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - this chain of 1/2 gaps is too long, i'd make 1/1 somewhere

1. 00:05:600 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - sliders deem to be difficult for beginners, perhaps make some circles
2. 00:45:482 (3) - nc?
3. 00:59:600 (1,2) - a bit too close

DTM9 Nowa wrote:

M4M from sm8 que

You can mod this -> https://osu.ppy.sh/s/656787

[]

General

00:05:601 - You don't need a red line here since you can have objects before the first one fix

Fix tags and kiai time snaps (aimod) a

The map isn't hitsounded a

01:19:364 - It would be nice to have the end's volume lowered a bit done

00:48:305 - I feel like the hitsound here isn't audible enough. It may be with the additions whenever you add them but right now... not really. The volume might be too low aswell to represent the cymbal + drum hit with the hitsounds i have in mind it should provide enough feedback


Easy

00:05:953 (2) - Maybe NC this since you have done that in the other difficulties yea

00:07:011 (3,1) - I mean structurally it would look better if this kind of overlapping would not happen doesn't impact gameplay too much so i think it should be fine


Normal

Some DS stuff in aimod

00:36:658 (5,1) - Perhaps you could suit visual flow here aswell? It kinda looks odd to have that one pattern not really flowing when literally everything else is atleast to some degree did

00:37:011 (1,2,3) - Also it'd be nice to see if these would've formed some kind of a pattern since they all are mapped on the hold vocals, for example https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9131647 kinda like how it is right now

00:45:482 (1,3) - Visuals & structure kinda lacking because of the overlap :S i tried to fix

00:56:776 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - I feel like the 3 on the second pattern should be a 1/2 slider because of the vocal is different on it fixy

00:59:600 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - No matter if you make that hitcircle I mentioned above into a 1/2 slider, the continuous object chain is extremely long for a normal difficulty. I'd recommend to remove the hitcircle on 01:00:835 (4) - , preferably 01:00:129 (2) - aswell, since the 4 is mapped on a silent synthesizer sound and the 2 is mapped on a similar drum hit you have ignored here 01:00:482 - for exampleyea done!!


Hard

00:05:953 (1,2,1,2) - It'd be nice if you could work on the invisible structure atleast in your future maps ^^ (hit animations off if you want to see the overlaps properly)invisible structure? wat

00:08:070 (4,5) - 00:10:541 (3,4,5,6) - You really should be consistent with the rhythm and patterning choices. osu! is a rhythm game so similar rhythm should have similar representation through the mapping. Also regarding this, I think 00:10:894 (4,5,6) - this is bit too big spacing for a hard difficulty ok no clue what i was doing for both of those lol

00:37:011 (1,2) - This could be better if it was a 1/1slider|hitcircle or 1/2slider|hitcircle|hitcircle since it kinda feels awkward to have a hold on the 2 as there isn't really anything specific the hold would represent following guitars eeeee

00:40:894 (4,5,4,4,4,5) - I'm kinda confused why these aren't 1/2 sliders. The hitcircles are all mapped on hold vocals plus there is a drum beat on nearly every single red tick after the hitcircle i didn't hear drum beat on red tick when i first mapped unlucky

00:49:011 (3,4,5,6,7) - This pattern should have spacing emphasis for pretty obvious reasons kinda looks retarded but i did something

01:01:011 (6) - NC maybe since the combo getting quite long there i nced on repeat sliders instead

01:09:482 (4) - NC for consistency with 00:56:776 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - d


Insane

00:11:600 (1,3) - Blanket don't see why i should

00:08:070 (4,5,6) - 00:13:717 (4,5,6,7) - Consistency in rhythm and spacing... d

00:51:129 (1,2,3,4,5) - This kind of continuing ellipse movement feels weird when compared to the usual back and forth style. Most of the time you use ellipse movement for couple of objects 01:05:247 (1,2,3) - but then change back to the back and forth style 01:05:776 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - i like to use varying movement with the same rhythm. it shouldn't be too big of an issue playability wise

00:51:129 (1,2) - Spacing like this just doesn't feel correct since the 2 is mapped on a snare drum which is supposed to be a strong beat. This could be fine for 3/4 slider->hitcircle but not for 1/2 sider->hitcircle. You might of course prioritize vocals but i don't think it'd fit to this kind of a song on this level since you follow the instrumentals through mapping choices while representing vocals through patterning and that doesn't really go hand in hand i was expecting some criticism on this so i guess i'll explain my reasons. yes, i was prioritizing vocals, as every circle leads into a jump to slider, where the next vocal verse is sung. now lets talk about what you mentioned here: i put sliders on "count" "the" "times", and times is held out for longer than normal, so i decided to map instruments on rather than making a long slider. stuff like that has been done on maps such as https://osu.ppy.sh/b/913490&m=0

for the part about the mapping choices or smth, i honestly don't understand what you mean. i tried to keep the style of the map consistent, so hopefully it's not too much of an issue that my patterns are too varying lol. if u could explain this point a little better that would help a ton.

Regarding the issue stated above if you are following vocals, why do you suddenly change the spacing emphasis to prioritize the melody here 00:53:247 (4,5,6,7) - ? 00:53:600 - Is definitely not that strong of a vocal snare hit, but not following vocals

01:02:423 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - Combo gets really long here again did

[]

Good luck~ ty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

h4d0uk3n1 wrote:

hi, nm from my queue

1. why 2 red points? just make one on 00:04:542 -
2. aimod

insane:

1. 00:58:188 (1,2) - too close visually tried something
2. 01:16:541 (2) - nc for sv change? yes

hard:

1. 00:08:070 (4,5,1) - make (1) a bit further from (4) and (5), visual distance moved 4 and 5 back instead cuz no room to move 1
2. 00:34:541 (2,4) - 00:52:894 (5,7) - 00:33:482 (3,1) - 00:54:482 (2,4) - too close fixed
3. 00:59:600 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this place feels a bit too difficult imo. jumps, high object density should be fine bcuz intense buildup

normal:

1. 00:45:482 (1,3) - it looks meh fixd
2. 00:59:600 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - this chain of 1/2 gaps is too long, i'd make 1/1 somewhere

easy:

1. 00:05:600 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - sliders deem to be difficult for beginners, perhaps make some circles don't want it to become too scarce
2. 00:45:482 (3) - nc? a
3. 00:59:600 (1,2) - a bit too close looks fine imo

Hope I helped. Good luck !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dashyy- wrote:

00:51:129 (1,2) - Spacing like this just doesn't feel correct since the 2 is mapped on a snare drum which is supposed to be a strong beat. This could be fine for 3/4 slider->hitcircle but not for 1/2 sider->hitcircle. You might of course prioritize vocals but i don't think it'd fit to this kind of a song on this level since you follow the instrumentals through mapping choices while representing vocals through patterning and that doesn't really go hand in hand i was expecting some criticism on this so i guess i'll explain my reasons. yes, i was prioritizing vocals, as every circle leads into a jump to slider, where the next vocal verse is sung. now lets talk about what you mentioned here: i put sliders on "count" "the" "times", and times is held out for longer than normal, so i decided to map instruments on rather than making a long slider. stuff like that has been done on maps such as https://osu.ppy.sh/b/913490&m=0

for the part about the mapping choices or smth, i honestly don't understand what you mean. i tried to keep the style of the map consistent, so hopefully it's not too much of an issue that my patterns are too varying lol. if u could explain this point a little better that would help a ton.

Dashyy- wrote:

Regarding the issue stated above if you are following vocals, why do you suddenly change the spacing emphasis to prioritize the melody here 00:53:247 (4,5,6,7) - ? 00:53:600 - Is definitely not that strong of a vocal snare hit, but not following vocals

Dashyy- wrote:

00:51:129 (1,2,3,4,5) - This kind of continuing ellipse movement feels weird when compared to the usual back and forth style. Most of the time you use ellipse movement for couple of objects 01:05:247 (1,2,3) - but then change back to the back and forth style 01:05:776 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - i like to use varying movement with the same rhythm. it shouldn't be too big of an issue playability wise

1. Why not map the break? you cut the mp3 to a third of it, at least map all that you got.

1. You can start the map with a spinner, it can emphasize the sounds nicely.
2. 01:00:657 (3) - 01:01:363 (3) - Unsnapped Objects.
3. 00:37:364 (2) - Move this down so it doesn't touch (1). It looks kind of messy right now.
4. 00:43:011 (3) - Move this to the right so it doesn't touch (7).
5. 00:53:247 (4,5,6,7,1) - Flow here is a little choppy, I don't really know the reasoning, but it just doesn't play so nicely. The main issue is the transition between 7 and 1. Maybe just move 1 to the right of 7? it could work.
6. 00:56:776 (1,2) - Maybe blanket these a little better? could look neat.
7. 00:57:305 (2,1) - Again, messy overlap.
8. 01:08:070 (1,2) - Blanket could be a little better. If you temporarily ctrl+G (2), You can see that the approach circle doesn't fit on the slider body of (1).
9. 01:08:600 (2,1) - Again, messy overlap.
10. 01:10:012 (2,3) - ^

1. Why are you using CS4.2? There's no reason for such circlesize, especially since Insane is CS4.
2. 00:05:953 (1,1) - Overlap looks untidy, please make these not touch.
3. 00:06:658 (3,2) - ^
4. 00:08:423 (5,3) - ^
5. 00:34:541 (2,4) - ^
6. 00:42:658 (1,4) - ^
7. 00:44:070 (1) - If you rotate this by 6 degrees, you can see that the slider isn't actually following the same angle.
8. 00:44:776 (3,4) - Overlap
9. 00:53:952 (1) - Again, angles aren't identical.
10. 00:54:482 (2) - Not the most visually pleasing slider, but it can pass if you really like it. The main issue with it that it's very random compared to the rest of the map that uses pretty basic shapes.
11. 01:04:188 (5,8) - That's a good overlap! Do em like that!
12. 01:09:129 (3) - Missing hitsound
13. 01:09:482 (1,2) - again

1. You chose the worst distance snap possible, the circles touch but only on the edges, it just looks ehhhhhhhhh
2. 00:11:600 (1,4) - Maybe make these the same angle for nice visuals?
3. 00:15:482 (1,2) - Spacing Error.
4. 00:38:423 (3,1) - aaa
5. 00:45:482 (5) - ok this is the same thing i said on the previous diff.

Avena wrote:

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

General

1. Why not map the break? you cut the mp3 to a third of it, at least map all that you got. idk how to properly map break Lol

Insane

1. You can start the map with a spinner, it can emphasize the sounds nicely. can't rlly do that cuz idk where to put it without sounding weird + placing green line to change volume unsnaps circle in beginning rip
2. 01:00:657 (3) - 01:01:363 (3) - Unsnapped Objects. yes
3. 00:37:364 (2) - Move this down so it doesn't touch (1). It looks kind of messy right now. yes
4. 00:43:011 (3) - Move this to the right so it doesn't touch (7). yes
5. 00:53:247 (4,5,6,7,1) - Flow here is a little choppy, I don't really know the reasoning, but it just doesn't play so nicely. The main issue is the transition between 7 and 1. Maybe just move 1 to the right of 7? it could work. yes
6. 00:56:776 (1,2) - Maybe blanket these a little better? could look neat. not yes cuz blankets are overrated B)
7. 00:57:305 (2,1) - Again, messy overlap. yes
8. 01:08:070 (1,2) - Blanket could be a little better. If you temporarily ctrl+G (2), You can see that the approach circle doesn't fit on the slider body of (1). not yes
9. 01:08:600 (2,1) - Again, messy overlap. not yes cuz that one is ok
10. 01:10:012 (2,3) - ^not even an overlap wut

1. Why are you using CS4.2? There's no reason for such circlesize, especially since Insane is CS4. g
2. 00:05:953 (1,1) - Overlap looks untidy, please make these not touch.
3. 00:06:658 (3,2) - ^
4. 00:08:423 (5,3) - ^
5. 00:34:541 (2,4) - ^
6. 00:42:658 (1,4) - ^ did all but last one because idk how too fix that one
7. 00:44:070 (1) - If you rotate this by 6 degrees, you can see that the slider isn't actually following the same angle. fix
8. 00:44:776 (3,4) - Overlap f
9. 00:53:952 (1) - Again, angles aren't identical. with what tho
10. 00:54:482 (2) - Not the most visually pleasing slider, but it can pass if you really like it. The main issue with it that it's very random compared to the rest of the map that uses pretty basic shapes. it's a pishifat slider mmmmmm
11. 01:04:188 (5,8) - That's a good overlap! Do em like that! i tried but it's really hard to get exact positioning for these
12. 01:09:129 (3) - Missing hitsound fix ur program grumd
13. 01:09:482 (1,2) - again

Normal

1. You chose the worst distance snap possible, the circles touch but only on the edges, it just looks ehhhhhhhhh all low distance snaps on lower diffs look eh, this is like the only ok one
2. 00:11:600 (1,4) - Maybe make these the same angle for nice visuals? forgot to copy paste f
3. 00:15:482 (1,2) - Spacing Error. a
4. 00:38:423 (3,1) - aaa dfkjasdfjlasdkfo;s
5. 00:45:482 (5) - ok this is the same thing i said on the previous diff. didn't point anything out for this object on previous diff gg. if u talking about overlap tho i like this ojne the way it is

Easy is fine, except for like, the same angle issues i mentioned previously.
Overall, the mapset plays really well, but your visuals and structure are heavily lacking.
If you want, I can give you a few tips about that, feel free to message me ingame for a chitchat :^)!

a q p w wrote:

hitsound remarks mentioned in Easy apply to other diffs too

Easy

1. 00:27:835 - perhaps you can map these percussion beats with a 1/1 slider. They're rather prominent and you did it at one stage (00:05:600 (1) - ) sure
2. 01:08:070 (1) - missing clap on slider end a
3. 00:45:482 (1) - perhaps add a finish hitsound here for the cymbal crash in the music fffffff
4. 01:13:364 (4) - I would add a clap here too, same percussion hit as 01:13:011 (3) - which was hitsounded with a clap afasfasdfa
5. 01:15:129 (6) - try adding a whistle here? would work better with the heavy guitar/drum imo asdasdasdasdasd
6. 01:10:894 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - combo a bit too long (deviates from ususal NC per two measures pattern). Consider adding an NC at 01:13:717 (5) - or 01:15:129 (6) - added!!!!!!!!!!

Normal

1. 00:15:482 (1) - excessive NC. An NC only at 00:14:423 (1) - will suffice. Also because you didn't use this "NC pattern for any of the other diffs at this point of time did
2. 00:15:482 (1,2) - careful with spacing! (currently 1.37x when it should be around 1.2x)
3. 00:28:541 (3) - add an NC here? It would fit well with the music as the verse starts here nced
4. 00:45:482 (5) - missing NC nced
5. 00:46:894 (7) - offscreen object not offscreen tho
6. 01:10:894 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same as in Easy

Hard

1. 00:09:482 (3,4) - you typically increase spacing for this type of rhythm/pattern e.g. 00:14:070 (5,1) - , 00:12:305 (3,1) - . so you can probably apply the same idea here. Also don't forget to NC if you do i didn't tho?
2. 00:12:658 (1) - the curve at the end of the slider doesn't seem very necessary. it actually breaks some of the slider design cohesion i.e. to 00:07:011 (1) - it looks fine tbh (it''s a pishi slider mmmm)
3. 00:34:541 (2,4) - the very slight overlap here seems kinda messy. Would make more sense imo if you overlap it some more like how you did it at 00:35:952 (2,4) -
4. 00:45:129 (4) - possible to space this slider a little bit more to avoid the overlap with 00:44:776 (3) - ? e.g. https://puu.sh/xGgjm/42c5874de0.png
5. 01:13:364 (8,9,1) - the flow here is kinda awkward. you have Anti-clockwise flow at 01:12:835 (5,6,7,8,9) - but then go the opposite rotational direction at 01:13:717 (1) - . I suggest ctrl+h'ing the slider to allow the rotational flow direction to continue in an Anti-clockwise manner. I think this would make the pattern play a bit better used that to emphasize 1 cuz strongest sound eeeeeeee

Insane

1. check AIMod for unsnapped objects
2. 00:14:423 (1,5) - perhaps you can silence the slider ends of these extended sliders. There's no beat on those blue ticks so having a quieter hitnormal for those ticks would be beneficial ok
3. 00:38:423 (5,6) - the "flow pattern" deviates from the other instances 00:37:011 (1,2) - and 00:37:717 (3,4) - in which the sliders are pretty much parallel (or opposing ends). I suggest coming up with new placements to continue on this idea e.g. https://puu.sh/xGgQJ/cb490cbce0.png did
4. 00:43:011 (3) - the idea i'm getting from the previous parts in this section is that you increase spacing for the snare/claps. however that idea isn't seen here. perhaps increase spacing here to make the idea more consistent did things
5. 00:48:305 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - 20% volume for the start seems a bit too quiet imo. Consider applying the same increasing volume idea but starting at a higher initial volume. ~40% should be nice (e.g. 40/55/70/85/100) ok
6. 00:53:952 (1,2) - a bit too spaced compared to other instances (e.g. 00:51:129 (1,2) - , 01:05:247 (1,2) - ). decrease spacing here a tad
7. 01:10:894 (1,1) - same thing I mentioned previously about extended slider slider ends ggggg

glgl

Ambrew wrote:

fmq~

Just some really minor things on insane

[Insane]
00:27:835 (1,2,3,4) - Review this hitsounding. Should be clap-whistle-whistle-clap, not clap-clap-whistle-clap a
00:33:658 (4) - x:505 y:351
00:33:835 (5) - x:408 y:222 how does that make them better tho
00:38:423 (5,6) - I would use bigger spacing here, since the sound starts to grow louder right around here yea
00:42:305 (7) - x:273 y:15
00:53:423 (5) - x:245 y:356 how does that make them better tho
01:08:070 (1,2) - Blanket to me looks slightly off on the right side did
01:10:541 (3) - Could fix the off-stack, here (01:09:129 (3) - ) next is 0.05, and here 01:10:541 (3) - it's 0.03 such a small difference i don't think anyone is gonna notic it while playin g lol

This is probably the only diff I can mod in, the rest of them look great, so I can't find anything to really improve

best of luck! ty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1. 00:12:658 (2) - Not sure why this is spaced x.87, should be x1 or x.99 like everything else
2. 01:00:658 (2) - I'd move this to x:333 y:255 so it looks better. Like this.
   
   good

1. 00:16:541 (5,6) - Same thing as the easy (what I said about 00:12:658 (2) -)

1. 00:45:482 (1) - Considering how accented this note is, I'd space it out more.

Milar001 wrote:

Hi, from my queue

[Easy]
00:11:600 (1,2) - Space equally fic
00:16:541 (3) - Uncomfortable, CTRL G why tho it's slow enough to react to

[Normal]
00:28:541 (3) - NC g

[Hard]
00:09:835 (4) - NC, also it's offscreen object (unrankable) fixx

[Insane]
00:51:129 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - I understand the idea, but it doesn't represent song well. First one is OK, but you should change the second and third one to 1/2 all three of them are held out tho
00:53:952 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - ^

Hope will be helpful
Nice map, I'll leave a star

Sharkie wrote:

what up my dude


[General]
00:39:835 - 00:48:129 - This whole section has floor toms on every eighth note. (Every 1/2)
I'd hitsound that did

[Easy]

1. 00:12:658 (2) - Not sure why this is spaced x.87, should be x1 or x.99 like everything else
2. 01:00:658 (2) - I'd move this to x:333 y:255 so it looks better. Like this. ok
   
   good

[Hard]

1. 00:16:541 (5,6) - Same thing as the easy (what I said about 00:12:658 (2) -)not all of hard is dsed

[Insane]

1. 00:45:482 (1) - Considering how accented this note is, I'd space it out more. did

cool set +1 thanks babe

BlakeBestWaifu wrote:

From my modding Q

Easy

00:12:658 (2) - Everything is 1.0x DS then this is 0.87x?
00:16:541 (3,1) - That is a long break that you could map. Is there a reason or just lazy? song here is zzzzzzzzzzzzz

Hard

00:45:482 (1) - That slider looks ugly it's a pishi slider which means best slider
00:54:482 (2) - ^
01:12:835 (5,6,7,8,9) - It is a hard, be nice intense portion of song = big spacing
01:16:541 (2) - Another odd looking slider ok how is that odd it's pretty common

Good luck with mapset!

1. 00:07:011 (2,1) - I think that overlapping of the slider slides is fine, but it is better to avoid overlapping at the beginning of the slider
2. 00:28:541 (1,3) - It is very close and looks cramped (3) should be brought a little to the left
3. 00:52:894 (3,2) - overlap
4. 00:56:776 (1,1) - 01:02:070 (4,2) - I think that it is better to stack
   If you are making it intentionally please go through
5. 01:02:070 (4) - Additions Drum Clap is better
6. 01:04:188 (3,2) - overlap
7. 01:08:070 (1,2) - I am very awkward.
   01:08:070 (1) - 01:08:070(1) - I think that you can copy this and make it 90 ° with Ctrl+Shit+R Image

1. 00:14:423 (1,1) - Can not stack?
2. 00:58:188 (1,2) - 01:07:717 (7,1) - Why are the distances different?
3. 01:02:070 (7) - Additions Drum Clap is better
4. 01:13:011 (3) - Add NC
   00:16:541 (1) - like this

1. 00:15:482 (3) - 00:16:541 (5) - Add NC
   just like Normal
2. 01:02:070 (2) - Additions Drum Clap is better
3. 00:14:423 (1,2,3,4) - 01:10:894 (1,2,3,4) - Why is the rhythm different?

1. 00:31:364 (1,3) - overlap
2. 00:32:247 (4,1) - Considering your mapping I think that it is better not to be a stack
3. 01:02:070 (5,6,7,8) - Additions Drum Clap is better

LowLevelPro wrote:

From my queue )/

Normal

00:46:541 (1) - Add nc. did

Hard

00:06:482 (2,2) - Make these notes at the same position. fine as it is
01:09:482 (1,2) - Try removing the overlap. made it nicer
01:13:717 (1,2) - Very long sliders, looks awkward. idk it looks fine rn

Good luck with the mapset

Yasaija 714 wrote:

Have you read my post?
p/6313495/
You are mod modifying another map.
Actually M4M does not hold, but I do mod. You do not need to mod into the map I recently posted
This time it's special in ur post ithe link brought me to beaver lol must've clicked the wrong link srry

Easy

1. 00:07:011 (2,1) - I think that overlapping of the slider slides is fine, but it is better to avoid overlapping at the beginning of the slider ok i did something
2. 00:28:541 (1,3) - It is very close and looks cramped (3) should be brought a little to the left did
3. 00:52:894 (3,2) - overlap why tho it looks gross
4. 00:56:776 (1,1) - 01:02:070 (4,2) - I think that it is better to stack yes
   If you are making it intentionally please go through
5. 01:02:070 (4) - Additions Drum Clap is better dont get why? added custom clap here tho so i guess kinda changed
6. 01:04:188 (3,2) - overlap
7. 01:08:070 (1,2) - I am very awkward. no ur not ur cute <3
   01:08:070 (1) - 01:08:070(1) - I think that you can copy this and make it 90 ° with Ctrl+Shit+R Image ok

Normal

1. 00:14:423 (1,1) - Can not stack? did
2. 00:58:188 (1,2) - 01:07:717 (7,1) - Why are the distances different? fix
3. 01:02:070 (7) - Additions Drum Clap is better
4. 01:13:011 (3) - Add NC
   00:16:541 (1) - like this fix

Hard

1. 00:15:482 (3) - 00:16:541 (5) - Add NC ok
   just like Normal
2. 01:02:070 (2) - Additions Drum Clap is better
3. 00:14:423 (1,2,3,4) - 01:10:894 (1,2,3,4) - Why is the rhythm different? fixed

Insane

1. 00:31:364 (1,3) - overlap looks bad imo
2. 00:32:247 (4,1) - Considering your mapping I think that it is better not to be a stack did
3. 01:02:070 (5,6,7,8) - Additions Drum Clap is better

Good luck!

Mir wrote:

Hitsounding

00:51:394 - Please silence these ends on Insane they feel so out of place. ok did

Insane
- 00:28:894 (2,5) - A bit too close, move 5 away a bit? fix
- 00:31:364 (1,3) - eee ^ fix2
- 00:56:070 (4,5,6,7) - Felt underwhelming compared to the song, maybe buff this a bit? https://i.imgur.com/9QoZNAY.png or something idk kinda like how it is atm since 6 and 7's vocals are lower pitch so i used lower spacing zzz
- 00:56:776 - How come you did something different for here and 01:08:070 -? The latter has stacks and the former doesn't? yeah idk what i was doing there fixed
- 01:16:541 (1) - Try higher SV? Feels a bit weak too. Maybe NC it too. Apply for all diffs (the NC). it's nced tho? did sv thing

Visuals feel slightly unorganized... might want to make things a bit more structured in that sense. Example: 01:05:247 (1,3,5) - If 1 and 3 are curved and all follow the same thing, shouldn't 5 also be curved? 00:28:541 (1,2) - 00:29:952 (1,2) - same thing. Would be nicer if they were the same shape instead of juxtaposing two different shapes for the same thing. i kinda liked the whole thing with the different slider shapes as i think it's kind of a unique concept (trying to explain my reasoning without saying it's my style lol) i'll fix some that look rlly ugly tho

That's pretty much all it is, you can easily fix some of this.

Normal
- 00:08:423 (7) - Circle could fit to lower density a bit here. Could do this for all of these patterns. did
- 01:16:541 - Better circle than spinner tbh. Spinner has no impact. Same for Easy diff. ok

Easy
- 00:09:835 (2) - Sugoi jump! Hai!

Seems to be okay for the most part. I'll possibly come back, but don't call me.

CucumberCuc wrote:

Hello
M4M
[Easy]
00:08:776 (1,2) check distance pls
00:29:952 (3,1,2) ^
01:01:717 (3,4,1) ^ did all
01:03:835 (2) i think this can move a bit left-down for better distance ok
[Normal]
00:14:070 (7,1) do slightly are close for better distance? would break time distance equality
01:07:717 (7,1) overlap very are close fix
[Hard]
01:11:776 maybe put here circle?
01:16:011 ^ for vocal sound don't do either in any diffs so would be confusing
[Insane]
*slightly not good for mod this diff*
00:12:658 (1,5) have bad overlap both objects are far enough to the point where it doesn't look terrible z
00:30:835 (4) maybe move slightly up what be 2,4 slightly was not are close ok
00:32:070 (3) ^ too, but down don't like that one tho
00:29:247 (3,1) - 00:32:247 (4,1) different overlap distance fix
00:45:835 (3) i think end slider can move left for better flow fine how it is
strange moment when you 00:52:188 (5,1) do slightly far and on 00:55:011 (5,1) have overlap it's my bad aesthetics
01:02:423 (1,2) have very are close overlap then next objects 3,4, maybe try this? did something else cuz ur suggestion is offscreen
01:16:011 as for Hard

_orange wrote:

m4m, great song!

[Easy]

01:04:188 (3,2) - Could you possibly get rid of this overlap? it might be possible if you move some things around a bit ok

[Normal]

00:15:482 (1) - I don't think this NC is really necessary, it's really similar to 00:14:423 (1,2) - anyway 01:11:952 (1,2) - same here agree
00:59:247 (3) - Imo you could make this into a single circle so that it's the same as 00:56:776 (1,2,3) - and i think it just feels better with a small recovery break it's a nice buildup + 01:01:011 (5,6) - provided recovery here so should be alright

[Hard]

00:42:305 (5) - Kinda awkward, could you ctrl+h it or something? how is it awkward? it goes with 00:41:247 (1,2,3,4) - 's flow
01:00:658 (5,8) - Make these parallel, it makes it look a lot cleaner ok
01:09:482 (1,2) - Blanket this pls :p ok2
01:10:894 (4) - NC yes
01:11:423 (5) - 01:12:482 (2) - Missing hitsounds like in the insane diff thx

The spacing emphasis in some parts of this diff is a bit problematic. 00:51:129 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,1,2,3) - This whole section doesn't have any spacing emphasis. At least do it on downbeats like you did before the kiai section. 00:56:776 (1) - 00:53:952 (1) - 01:05:247 (1) - 01:08:070 (1) - ok yeah i did some

You also have these jumps in two specific parts 01:12:835 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - in the rest of the diff you only break dsitance spacing on really important notes. so these jumps at the end seem unfitting and really difficult. 00:49:364 (5,6,7) - also applies here to a smaller extent. Just to show you how hard these actually are, I deleted the jumps and the diff went from 3.35* to 3.07* which is pretty huge imo. but like drums at the end are intense so intense jumps to show that climax

Despite the spacing problems, I really like this diff! I love the slider design and the flow

[Insane]

00:41:952 (6,7) - Space these out more tried
00:51:482 (2) - Clap no snare hit tho
00:54:305 (2,3) - Increase spacing already spaced as far as possible
01:13:011 (5) - NC? a
01:09:129 (3) - 01:10:541 (6) - Missing claps on the heads aaaaa
There's a few overlaps that aren't so pretty

Love the song and map c: I hope you get this ranked

HootOwlStar wrote:

• easy

1. 00:07:011 (2,3,1) - there should be an alternative to avoid the overlap and i'm sure you could find out one ok i couldn't fully fix the overlap but i made it look nicer
2. 01:10:894 (1) - could consider making the slider to be 3/2 instead, taking 00:14:423 (1,2) - as reference i HATE MAPPING SLIDERS JKFHNJK:FHJ:FJLF

• normal

1. 00:33:835 (5) - adjusting the position to be lower than 00:32:776 (4) - would introduce a better circular flow instead of the current one which is rather obstructed ok
2. 00:59:600 (1,2,3,4,5) - these don't seem to follow major musical beats and serve more as filler rhythms, in which they are unnatural to play imo. following the synths would be better i am following synths tho?

• hard

1. 00:05:601 (1,1) - stacking or bigger distances would emphasize the introduction better since it provides the kick better idk the idea is as you implemented in the highest difficulty stackd
2. 01:16:541 - personally think that stopping the map here would be better since the continuation from the cut-off point is quite weird frankly. same as insane though but the hold guitar is emphasized with slidr and spinner is there cuz only slider sounds kinda awkward imo

• insane

1. 01:07:717 (6,7) - consider to ctrl+g these two notes to provide a better flow thats teh ppoint cuz strong sound = uncomfortable movement
2. 01:10:894 (1,2) - relative distance time concept is ruined here. this is the only exception where 1/4 gap is spaced so maybe fix it up or sth fixzed

sorry for bad modding. good luck in everything!

1. Hitsounds sometimes missing: for example 00:12:305 (3) - (clap), 00:16:541 (1,2) - (could be whistle on 1, clap on 2), 00:28:364 (4) - (clap), 01:02:776 (2) -, 01:05:600 (2) - etc. I see it more throughout the diff. Could you double check the diff for missed hitsound spots?
   
2. 00:49:011 (5,6,7,8) - I feel it's better if you separate this pattern from the first half more - perhaps with a harsher angle/spacing change and a nc? The stronger guitars there make this stand out from the rest
   
3. 00:55:011 (5) - Maybe make the movement upwards instead of downwards instead? Since 00:54:482 (3) - is already going downwards
   
4. 01:16:541 (2) - No hs at all on this strong sound? D:

1. Actually the hitsound thing goes for this diff as well.. I guess you get the gist of it now?
   
2. 00:51:129 (1,3) - Make these blanket? Perfect opportunity!
   
3. 01:05:776 (2,3) - Move them a bit further away so it doesn't look so visually crammed, or make 01:06:305 (3) - a lightning shape too so they work better together
   
4. 01:12:835 (3,4,5,6,7) - If you're going to make it this close to a star shape, you might as well just make it a perfect one with the polygon tool tbh.
   
5. 01:13:717 (1) - I think you can do something more creative with this slider for a better finisher, rather than a bland curve
   
6. 01:16:541 (8) - same as insane, would appreciate a strong hitsound there