Xayler wrote:

1. I see that you use different SV's here, is that rankable for the lowest difficulty? I haven't read last posts here so I'll just mention it.

Winter Story wrote:

1. 02:19:512 (1) - unrankable stuff . Changes of SV in Normal is strictly prohibited as it will break the visual spacing. Make this x1.0 SV again who says it's unrankable? it doesn't say in ranking criteria w if it says, i'm oretty sure it just a guideline and you don't have to follow it xP I want to make lower sv to emphasize the high sound and it's the end too.

Edit:I asked various modders about this and these are their answers.

ByBy wrote:

from my q

[general]
do you have metadata reference? seems like the artist is M2U as you can see here http://puu.sh/vUegh/50f8ab419f.jpg so Guriri would be at tags since the title appears to be Marigold but without Guriri you could look at kitty's metadate. i named it like in youtube so.
no sliderslide for normal sampleset? at 01:52:512 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - in normal for instance it sounds pretty loud w/o sliderslide and it makes unpleasant since the music is calm on this part after chorus

[normal]
because this is the easiest diff of the set you're not allowed to have the stack leniency behind 6 nor 7 set it to 6 for instance
00:26:637 (2) - seems like you missed a drum hitwhistle which makes inconsistent with 00:20:637 (2) - imo because the violin is the same and having a drum
hitwhistle would fit with the violin // 00:27:762 (4) - same applies here but the drum hitwhistle should be on its tail // 00:28:512 (5) - hitwhistle on tail
00:28:512 (1) - you missed a nc here don't really wanna add here
00:30:012 (1,2,3) - as i can see here you tried to make the spacing looking like you used 1.2x no? unfortunately it looks more bigger in comparison with 1.2x spacing sections and this spacing change looks pretty noticeable if you want to make the spacing looking like you're actually using 1.2x spacing i reckon you should use 1.3x spacing instead the spacing's appearance will be as 00:25:512 (1,2,3,4,5,6) -'s let's say this one no. i still wanna keep consistency ds because it's still in intense(?) part// 00:32:262 (3,1) - from here would be nice to have 1.4x spacing here to looks like you're using 1.2x spacing
00:58:512 (4) - i would better avoid stacking both of them because the newbie player can confuse the tail with the head then and them can make a sliderbreak easily imo plus it is the easiest diff of the set so let's try getting rid of stacks tbh // 01:05:637 (4,1) - same goes here // 01:10:137 (2,3) - // 02:05:637 (2,3) - and so on just my opinion dk where to put all of these TT
00:37:512 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - no sliderslide? having the sliderbodies louder doesn't fit with the calm part of the music tbh and it sounds unpleasant to my ears so having sliderslide would fit pretty well with the calm part of the music plus changing to s:c1 can't be possible ;w; // 02:16:512 (1,2) - same here lol it's default hs so xp
01:04:512 (3) - seems like you're mostly focused on vocals as i can judge from 01:07:512 (3,4) - and i don't this 2/1 slider brings enough emphasis tbh would fit more the vocals if you will split this 2/1 slider into 2 1/1 sliders instead as you did at 01:07:512 (3,4) - http://puu.sh/vUOJ2/61d00aff7e.jpg instead changing 01:07:512 (3,4) to 2/1 slider[/color
01:16:512 (2) - tbh don't you think that a 1/1 slider with reverse arrow would fit more than a 2/1 slider? it would fit the vocals too but also there are some snares too which are pretty noticeable http://puu.sh/vUOTU/fc2897506e.jpg // 01:25:512 (2) - same applies here since the violin requires more emphasis imo ds ;w; // 01:33:012 (1) - ds ;w;
01:18:012 - starting from here until the very end of the chorus the overlaps are less noticeable like 01:19:512 (3,4) - for instance and then in HR mode they are not overlapped as they're supposed to be anymore the solution is to decrease the overall spacing to 1.1 or 1.0 let's say but i am afraid that you have to do to the whole diff since the chorus can't have the lowest spacing in comparison with non-chorus parts imo // 01:54:012 (3,4,1,2,3,4) - same applies here too I think it's fine and it isn't a problem tho. I just want to make ds consistent like the other parts so i keep this

[Hard]
00:32:262 (3) - tbh i feel like there are "triplets" in the song at 00:32:449 - which are slightly ignored imo so i don't think a simple 1/1 slider would give more emphasis to the instruments themself so by making a new rhythm like this or this you will give more emphasis to the instruments and also you won't ignore these "triplets" from the song anymore
01:16:512 (1) - the instruments are very intense here and i think a simply 1/1 slider wouldn't give more emphasis as you thought therefore the intense instruments are calling for more emphasis by having an 1/2 slider with reverse arrow will fit much better and also will give more emphasis to the intense instruments
01:27:199 (2,3) - imo having 01:27:199 (2) - as a kickslider would make the next hitobject hard to distinguish because the player can be confused (as i did) and they can be frustated by a lame sliderbreak so would be better to replace this kickslider with an 1/2 note instead in order to make 01:27:387 (3) - easy to distinguish i prefer here ;w;

nice one here!

seems like you intented to req me to mod only the first 3 diffs as i can see and they're good enough to go except Kitty's Advanced... if you need mods on the next 5 diffs call me and also the sliderslide thingy is getting repeated throughout all diffs imo so i didn't need to repeat it on my mod sorry... Thanks but i think you don't need to. It has 5 more diffs and i think you will tired of these. ;(
gl!
p.s i really love this song <3 Me too! This is why I mapped it after the song has come in deemo for 3 days >w<

Xayler wrote:

I guess I'll mod this after all, but the mod will be a short one probably. a nazi one probably.
NM from my queue.

Normal

1. Most things mentioned here are just spacing what may take a few seconds to fix. spacing doesn't affect much to gameplay, but i'll try to fix it loma
2. 00:17:158 - I think the storyboard circle thingy would fit here also, like in the middle or something. looks bad for me
3. 00:51:012 (1,2,3) - It's a pretty much not seen, but could you have equal spacings for these? It's seen from approach circle that it's a bit closer to the (3) slider. Well the spacing is overall 1,21x and 1,19x there so maybe that's causing it.
4. 00:52:512 (3,4,1) - The spacings between these are also not 1,2x, especially for the (1).
5. 00:53:262 (4,2) - Stack?
6. 00:55:512 (3,4,1) - Slight spacing difference.
7. 00:58:137 (3,4) - ^
8. 01:04:512 (3,4) - I think that just move the whole stack with the slider closer to (3) to fix it here. no. I don't wanna make these stack together. It would make it boring because just not moving the cursor. xP
9. 01:06:762 - I feel like here would fit a clickable object a bit better because of how loud the vocal is. The next circle basically could fit better as a slidertail because there's basically nothing there. wanna make consistency
10. 01:09:012 (1,2) - Same stacking thing as mentioned above. same reason above
11. 01:14:262 (2,1) - Spacing?
12. 01:21:012 (1,2) - Stacking. ^ no
13. 01:55:512 (1,2,3,4) - The spacings here aren't that equal.
14. 02:04:512 (1,2) - Here the stack spacing is correct. (y) :thinking:
15. 02:07:137 (4) - This note is somehow really bad to click imo. Maybe make a slider 02:06:762 - from here instead? Otherwise 02:06:012 (3,4) - Fix the stack spacing if you don't consider it. no i don't care lo
16. 02:13:512 (1,2) - Stack. ^ same reason above of above of above

Since Hard diff doesn't really need the spacing things and it seemed fine for me then this should be all then, good luck! Thanks!

Nostalgic wrote:

nm from my q

• 
  [Insane]

1. 00:16:292 (2) - nc for bpm change
2. 01:11:074 (6,7) - stack for consistency unnecessary to make consistent zzz
3. 01:17:262 (3) - nc for sv change not really a major change so no. you can see that i add nc at 01:17:637 (1) because it has faster sv
4. 01:28:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - NO! pitch is dropping so why ds is increasing? Besides, this skystar-esque pattern is certainly not a good choice for an insane diff. why do i have to care? lololol
   
   [Extra]
5. 00:29:637 (5,6,7,8) - these four notes should be more spaced compare to 00:29:262 (1,2,3,4) due to the rise of pitch why don't we increase spacing at the beginning? i want to keep consistency lo
6. 00:39:574 (2,3,1) - if they are meant to be blanket then fix them pls no
7. 01:16:699 // 01:17:074 they should definitely be clickable slider tail makes it audible so it's not that unnecessary to do that
8. 01:24:762 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - i don't really get why this stream is suddenly that cramped low sound
9. 01:31:699 certainly a clickable sound then i have to do with 01:32:074 too. Aren't I?
10. 01:34:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - again pitch pls no
11. 02:16:512 (1,2,3,4) - avoid this kind of overlaps why? is there any problem making sliders overlapped? It doesn't affect to any ranking criteria zzz. I prefer making these kind of overlap. It looks neat for me.

GL

- Frontier - wrote:

Nostalgic wrote:

nm from my q

• 
  [Insane]

1. 00:16:292 (2) - nc for bpm change
2. 01:11:074 (6,7) - stack for consistency unnecessary to make consistent zzz
3. 01:17:262 (3) - nc for sv change not really a major change so no. you can see that i add nc at 01:17:637 (1) because it has faster sv
4. 01:28:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - NO! pitch is dropping so why ds is increasing? Besides, this skystar-esque pattern is certainly not a good choice for an insane diff. why do i have to care? lololol
   
   [Extra]
5. 00:29:637 (5,6,7,8) - these four notes should be more spaced compare to 00:29:262 (1,2,3,4) due to the rise of pitch why don't we increase spacing at the beginning? i want to keep consistency lo
6. 00:39:574 (2,3,1) - if they are meant to be blanket then fix them pls no
7. 01:16:699 // 01:17:074 they should definitely be clickable slider tail makes it audible so it's not that unnecessary to do that
8. 01:24:762 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - i don't really get why this stream is suddenly that cramped low sound
9. 01:31:699 certainly a clickable sound then i have to do with 01:32:074 too. Aren't I?
10. 01:34:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - again pitch pls no
11. 02:16:512 (1,2,3,4) - avoid this kind of overlaps why? is there any problem making sliders overlapped? It doesn't affect to any ranking criteria zzz. I prefer making these kind of overlap. It looks neat for me.

GL

- Frontier - wrote:

why do i have to care? lololol

Nostalgic wrote:

Wow this is so arrogant. I can give you tons of examples to prove what you said is wrong but why bother? why do i have to care? lololol

-NanoRIPE- wrote:

placeholder

normal
00:17:158 - why not put this green on the first note at 00:19:512 - which is more sense for me unnecessary
00:30:012 - you changed the sv at 00:33:012 - cause the beat become lower but you didnt do here no more background sound(?) here
00:37:512 - hmm the beats here looks not really dense imo (still low here) but you use 1,00x sv here xd? im prefer you changed it to 0,90x
00:57:762 (2) - move a bit down for avoid the linear flow (the current flow looks meh imo)
00:57:762 (2,3) - the piano seems strong here,maybe adds hitsound here? such as whistle or something
01:29:262 (4) - 2 circles for emphasis on vocal and drum more wanna keep it
01:54:762 (5) - move a bit to left for better flow ds
02:02:262 (2,3) - same as before,use whistle for the piano

the sv stuff really bothering me xd but as long its not unrankable i think its fine xd don't let me give the reason why lo xd

hard
00:32:637 (6,1) - im prefer you follow ds here cause increased ds when you in slow part it feels weird imo
00:58:137 (3) - move a bit down for avoid the linear flow
01:16:512 (1,2) - should be a jump here imo cause the beat of music start increase here
01:24:574 (5,6) - awkward movement imo,just stack (5) on (6) instead for better
01:27:199 (2) - 2 circles here cause in this part you use a lot of circle to emphatize the piano
01:28:512 (1) - hmm the rhythm not accurate imo.maybe a circle and then 2 circles at 01:28:699 - for emphatize the piano here wanna keep the consistent with 01:28:887 (2,3).

for hard maybe you should adds more jump for make the gap between hard > insane better there is already light insane which fills gap between hard and insane, so why? :3

insane
01:31:699 (5) - make clickable here cause the beat looks strong here don't know how to manage if i change to circles & i can't hear the specific sound to make it clickable

the structure on the whole diff looks ok but the gap between non kiai and kiai its really huge
i mean on non kiai you rare use jump and the rhythm is simple (you just focused on vocal only) but on kiai the rhythm so complex and dense,the jumps it looks like an extra diff than insane (sorry for bad english but i hope you understand)
so it makes unbalance because it's kiai so i think it deserves to make it harder than the non-kiai part.

ok thats it from me
GL!

Plaudible wrote:

BoatKrab's Insane

1. 00:10:512 (1,2,3,4) - I feel you could space these a bit more in contrast to 00:13:512 (1,2,3). the spacing for that rhythm is too far for me, so... I won't fix this
2. 00:17:024 (3) - Volume increase here is a cool idea, but it's way too much. Maybe like 20, 25, 30, 40? Something subtle would be perfect.
3. 00:33:012 (1,2,3) - Improve aesthetic spacing here a bit, move 3 out. I can't even imagine how it be ._.
4. 00:34:512 (3,4) - Line these up a bit better! heh?
5. 01:44:262 - I don't really agree with this custom break, the strings start earlier anyways so it feels a bit random, personally would just get rid of it.
6. 01:58:512 (1,3) - Line these up a bit better too.
7. 02:01:887 (3,4) - ^
8. 02:02:637 (2) - The tension with the strings and vocals make this a perfect candidate for a 3/4 slider. I just make the same pattern like 00:58:137 (2,3) -
9. 02:21:762 (1) - Improve this loop here a bit, could be nicer: http://puu.sh/wcODv/5efb406d6d.jpg Nice idea, but i really don't want to make more circle in slowly rhythm.
10. Sorry for aesthetic nitpicking, you really made this difficulty very well though. Just make these little things picture perfect and this'll go great. Great job boatkrab! \o/

thanks! :3

Deppyforce wrote:

ad
00:13:512 - this part doesnt feel mcuh different from preevyet part tho its weaker u could do smh about density to emphasize it more the other diffs don't
00:45:574 (2,3) - cool flow can u move 3 head a bit down intent to make a circle with 00:48:012 (1) -. that's what kitty would say
00:58:887 (2) - can u somehow change flow on this so it doesnt feel same as 00:57:762 (3,4,1) - to emphasizes dat its not a part of ze instrument thing its also an intsrumenmt, isnt it?
01:15:574 (2) - ds i agree
01:34:887 (3,4,5,6) - try this reetm http://puu.sh/wVk1J/269f24f60a.jpg i agree
02:19:512 (1) - nazi head touching previous tail so it losk bad it my style!!1!1!!

• Liberation

• Another

• Kitty

00:44:637 (3) - seems to be a sudden whistle here, remove plz?
01:04:324 (3,6) - there's a small overlap here.
01:05:262 (5,6) - I dont really sure about the flow here, seems diferent with others, try to create a straight line like https://puu.sh/wWDer/4af0d30d90.png might work.
01:28:887 (2,3) - fix up blanket(?)
01:36:012 (1,1) - overlap, its visible in the playfield
go check out the diff again, there's a small problem with spacing, probaly becouse you're using DS and using small Grid Size.

Error- wrote:

yay unloved
re:mod
nazi as always

• Liberation

00:07:137 (4,3) - possible blanket.
00:21:012 (1) - move to x:300 y:340 for better curve. https://puu.sh/wWC2f/f36b675608.png
00:24:762 (3) - why 1/2? use 1/4 to match the song. follow violin, not piano
00:52:512 (1,3) - not a perfect blanket (I know its only 1 pixel)
00:56:262 (6,7) - why don't you copy paste the objects from 00:55:887 (5) - ? it seems better imo, https://puu.sh/wWCcI/018d68bfbf.png i did it,
didn't t?
01:32:262 (3,1) - move out the tail and object of 01:32:262 (3) - to create better flow. this is already good flow
01:35:449 (2,1) - blanket? no
01:39:574 (4) - I know you can do the shape better. i prefer it
02:21:012 (3,1) - dunno about this but circular flow seems to be off. you try rotate 02:19:512 (1,2) - to 90 degree then you will know what i doing here

• Another

00:13:512 (1,2) - Fix up blanket already great blanket. try using 1/16
00:20:918 - feels weird when there's a clearly drum sound but no clickable object.
00:35:637 (4,1) - plz fix blanket already blanket
00:38:637 (3,1) - ^ ^
00:47:074 (2,3) - high chance of choke, try to move 00:47:262 (3) - to 00:46:137 (4) - 's head choke then why? i intend to emphasize the rhythm here since it's more dense than the previous part.
00:51:762 (3,1) - I dunno if you want to create a blanket here but if you want to, plz fix.
01:27:574 (6,1) - move out 01:27:574 (6) - 's tail a bit left for flow i intend to make (6)'s slider-tail to directly go to (1) to make and easier movement
02:02:074 (2,1) - another one :3 same reason
02:03:762 (1,1) - I liek to mention blanket

• Kitty

00:44:637 (3) - seems to be a sudden whistle here, remove plz?
01:04:324 (3,6) - there's a small overlap here.
01:05:262 (5,6) - I dont really sure about the flow here, seems diferent with others, try to create a straight line like https://puu.sh/wWDer/4af0d30d90.png might work. nah too bad
01:28:887 (2,3) - fix up blanket(?)
01:36:012 (1,1) - overlap, its visible in the playfield but 01:36:012 (1) has been completely faded out when 01:37:512 (1) comes. So i think it should be fine
go check out the diff again, there's a small problem with spacing, probaly becouse you're using DS and using small Grid Size. inconsistent ds is not unrankable

no kds coz I just remod this :d

plz rank this time plz find t2 for me this time

- Frontier - wrote:

still wanna giv to u
reply later

Error- wrote:

00:56:262 (6,7) - why don't you copy paste the objects from 00:55:887 (5) - ? it seems better imo, https://puu.sh/wWCcI/018d68bfbf.png i did it,
didn't t?

no you didnt :/ you only copy 00:56:262 (6,7) - but what I meant is 00:55:887 (5,6,7) - .

no kds coz I just remod this :d

plz rank this time plz find t2 for me this time

Unsnapped blanket isn't unrankable. It's just for aesthetics but not unrankable if don't.
Thsnka!

"Error- wrote:

no you didnt :/ you only copy 00:56:262 (6,7) - but what I meant is 00:55:887 (5,6,7) - .

Error- wrote:

i dont say unsnapped blanket unrankable :thinking:

Error- wrote:

00:52:512 (1,3) - not a perfect blanket (I know its only 1 pixel)

• 
  KittyAdventure's Advanced

1. 00:53:262 (3,4) - I think this 1/1 slider is good
   The sound in the interval should be expressed with a slider
2. 00:53:262 (3,3) - I think I can stack
3. 01:03:762 (2,5) - overlap
   Certainly the slider has disappeared but I think it is easy to avoid this
4. 01:11:637 (4,1) - The distance is 1.60 because you are changing the speed of the slider
5. 02:00:762 (3,4) - I think I can stack

- Frontier - wrote:

Error- wrote:

i dont say unsnapped blanket unrankable :thinking:

what's this one here? xd

Error- wrote:

00:52:512 (1,3) - not a perfect blanket (I know its only 1 pixel)

• [Hitsounding]
  mostly looking at the top diff unless mentioned otherwise

1. 00:01:512 - You know, your sliderslide.wav doesn't actually apply since the samplesets for these lines are just "S" and not "S:C1". Because there's no custom, it will pick from the default sound files, including the default sliderslide. In order to fix this, add a new custom soft sampleset. Then add a soft-sliderslide4.wav and replace all "S" with "S:C4".We're adding a new one and not using "S:C1" because it would replace your whistles on 00:04:512 - etc with kick-drums, which'd be bad.
   
2. btw add soft-sliderslide2.wav to avoid the long sliderslide thing at 00:35:824 - and others.
   
3. 00:01:512 - Seems like other diffs have a whistle here. You should really use the hitsound copier thing to make sure they're all the same. Will help you fix this top diff and then you can copy downwards to make sure you don't miss anything. For example look at 00:07:512 - in Insane and notice how it's different from the same part in liberation.
   
4. 00:20:637 - 00:22:137 - These sounds are here in the beginning but are apparently gone after this point. Try turning 00:23:637 - and 00:25:137 - into these as well. Basically sampleset -> drum, addition -> auto.
   
5. 00:58:137 - Some sound here for matching feedback would be nice, as the song is pretty strong here, maybe put a clap or whatnot.
   
6. 01:25:793 - Since you decided to skip adding whistles to this, and did a similar thing, probably intentionally at 01:24:855 - 01:26:355 - etc, I think removing the whistles from 01:24:293 - and 01:24:480 - would make things sound more consistent. 01:27:199 - Can stay as is, since it's more unique than the others, makes it stand out more like this too.
   
7. 01:42:012 - Seems to fit better without the whistle tbh, as the impact itself is rather quiet like the previous two.
   
8. 01:58:137 - This hitsound seems a bit out of place, could probably just remove it.
   
9. 02:02:918 - This slider tail should either be silent or faint, not have a harsh and loud hitnormal. Try applying a short soft sampleset here.
   
   [Liberation]
10. 01:19:512 - Sound is different from previous parts so could reflect it with something like this, for instance. Up to you though.
    
11. 02:18:949 - Would just end these sliders on the piano. Skipping it like this might get confusing as the length of the slider is lower, yet it doesn't end on anything in particular unlike the others.
    
    Let me know if some difficulty has it's own hitsounding and can't be copied to from the top diff

Yasaija 714 wrote:

m4m

I can not finely mod the map I was Qualified

• 
  KittyAdventure's Advanced

1. 00:53:262 (3,4) - I think this 1/1 slider is good
   The sound in the interval should be expressed with a slider ok
2. 00:53:262 (3,3) - I think I can stack i prefer this
3. 01:03:762 (2,5) - overlap
   Certainly the slider has disappeared but I think it is easy to avoid this ok
4. 01:11:637 (4,1) - The distance is 1.60 because you are changing the speed of the slider the spacing is as same as the others so i think it should be fine
5. 02:00:762 (3,4) - I think I can stack it's different voice so i think it shouldn't be stacked

Good luck! Thanks!

Naxess wrote:

^ respond to this first

- Frontier - wrote:

smth

Still didn't say it was unrankable tho. The term "unrankable" is literally "cannot under any circumstance be used in a ranked map", and is really just a general and basic requirement for the ranked section that is actually very easy to achieve. Doesn't have much to do with the quality of the map, which is what nominators mostly look at. (although ye blankets missing a pixel is kinda w/e imo lol) im just kidding lol. Because he likes to point out the blanket issues (like in my paradisus-paradoxum). So i told him like that xd

Minor stuff before we go

• [Hitsounding]
  mostly looking at the top diff unless mentioned otherwise

1. 00:01:512 - You know, your sliderslide.wav doesn't actually apply since the samplesets for these lines are just "S" and not "S:C1". Because there's no custom, it will pick from the default sound files, including the default sliderslide. In order to fix this, add a new custom soft sampleset. Then add a soft-sliderslide4.wav and replace all "S" with "S:C4".We're adding a new one and not using "S:C1" because it would replace your whistles on 00:04:512 - etc with kick-drums, which'd be bad. ok
   
2. btw add soft-sliderslide2.wav to avoid the long sliderslide thing at 00:35:824 - and others. ok
   
3. 00:01:512 - Seems like other diffs have a whistle here. You should really use the hitsound copier thing to make sure they're all the same. Will help you fix this top diff and then you can copy downwards to make sure you don't miss anything. For example look at 00:07:512 - in Insane and notice how it's different from the same part in liberation. ok
   
4. 00:20:637 - 00:22:137 - These sounds are here in the beginning but are apparently gone after this point. Try turning 00:23:637 - and 00:25:137 - into these as well. Basically sampleset -> drum, addition -> auto. 00:23:637 -i instead adding whistle here since the other diffs do and 00:25:137 -i instead leave it blank as the other diffs do too.
   
5. 00:58:137 - Some sound here for matching feedback would be nice, as the song is pretty strong here, maybe put a clap or whatnot. instead adding drum-hitwhistle here
   
6. 01:25:793 - Since you decided to skip adding whistles to this, and did a similar thing, probably intentionally at 01:24:855 - 01:26:355 - etc, I think removing the whistles from 01:24:293 - and 01:24:480 - would make things sound more consistent. 01:27:199 - Can stay as is, since it's more unique than the others, makes it stand out more like this too. ok
   
7. 01:42:012 - Seems to fit better without the whistle tbh, as the impact itself is rather quiet like the previous two. ok
   
8. 01:58:137 - This hitsound seems a bit out of place, could probably just remove it. ok
   
9. 02:02:918 - This slider tail should either be silent or faint, not have a harsh and loud hitnormal. Try applying a short soft sampleset here. instead adding 5%-volume green line here
   
   [Liberation]
10. 01:19:512 - Sound is different from previous parts so could reflect it with something like this, for instance. Up to you though. nice idea!
    
11. 02:18:949 - Would just end these sliders on the piano. Skipping it like this might get confusing as the length of the slider is lower, yet it doesn't end on anything in particular unlike the others. ok
    
    Let me know if some difficulty has it's own hitsounding and can't be copied to from the top diff There is BoatKrab's Insane that I can't change the hitsounds. Since he's making his own hitsound and I think I don't have permission to fix it. So I didn't fix it.

Oh also with the pm mod I did on the new advanced, you can actually give kds even though it's a remod, as the difficulty has undergone major remaps since then.

Naxess wrote:

7
Fixed some sliderslides, a normal sampleset silence glitch and an unsnapped slider tail in Another.
metadata

KittyAdventure wrote:

Yessss, btw are you used グリリ in title? As M2U write it in his second album?

http://m2u.studio/ALBUM

Lama Poluna wrote:

I think artist is correct, because it's M2U album, not Guriri.
But title must be Marigold (feat. 구리리) like on offical website and on ranked map.
Offical website > yt video

KittyAdventure wrote:

Lama Poluna wrote:

I think artist is correct, because it's M2U album, not Guriri.
But title must be Marigold (feat. 구리리) like on offical website and on ranked map.
Offical website > yt video

Fixed that please :^)

IamKwaN wrote:

Both japanese and korean are fine, as they are both quoted officially

Unicode Title: Marigold (feat. グリリ) or Marigold (feat. 구리리)
Romanised Title: Marigold (feat. Guriri)
Unicode Artist: M2U
Source: Deemo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_zasg8oWnA
http://www.universal-music.co.jp/m2u/pr ... icy-15598/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvNwYQUnDa0
http://m2u.studio/ALBUM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RiT4xPgRZo
https://www.facebook.com/rayark.deemo/

good luck!

sylao wrote:

why isnt this map ranked yet i fuckin love it gj man

Sinnoh wrote:

sylao wrote:

why isnt this map ranked yet i fuckin love it gj man

J_8579 wrote:

Too bad this isn't anywhere as difficult like in Deemo.

1. 00:24:387 (2,3,4) - You can do constant DS increase here as song is building up. Consistent spacing is meh especially due to the fact this is top difficulty
2. 00:59:262 (1) - Mute its sliderend ? it sounds kinda loud right now , You mute 00:58:137 (6) - so why not this one too
3. 01:22:512 (1) - You dont need this NC
4. 01:19:699 - The whistle doesn't make sense to me since its loud and shouldn't be here in first place, maybe mistake ? Its also there in other difficulties so remove it from there too! Also 01:31:699 - same
5. 01:35:262 (1,2) - it would be appropriate to have a little bit of sv increase for these because the song is going cRAzy
6. 01:40:137 (5) - Why not two kick sliders like 01:38:637 (5,6) - :c The whole part is jumpy and plays well but this slider kills the momentum

1. 00:20:262 (4,1) - Nazi but yeah you could avoid this overlap, its messy
2. 00:26:637 (3) - Kinda same to what i pointed in top difficulty, Dont kill the movement like this. The song doesnt loose intensity or something so i don't see a reason to why this is a single repeat slider
3. 00:58:512 (1,1) - Mute slider ends thing
4. 01:19:137 (1) - Remove NC

1. 00:35:824 - Isn't there supposed to be a custom sample 2 hitsound? its done that way in Other difficulties so yea, default whistle sounds out of place
2. 01:34:137 (6) - If you compare this to 01:33:387 (2,3,4,5) - You will notice that the first four notes had piano sounds on head only while the last one has sound on tail too so it would be better if its changed to circles instead
3. 02:15:762 (5) - Even tho the vocal at 02:16:512 - is faint, i still suggest you making it clickable because the piano sound is quite emphasized in the song and also the new stanza starts here

1. 00:59:262 (1) - same as Another, Liberation

Surono wrote:

srsbsnbns

DeRandom Otaku wrote:

I couldnt post yesterday cuz internet was meh, i wasnt expecting sinnoh's mod lol
[Boatkrab]

1. 00:35:824 - Isn't there supposed to be a custom sample 2 hitsound? its done that way in Other difficulties so yea, default whistle sounds out of place
2. 01:34:137 (6) - If you compare this to 01:33:387 (2,3,4,5) - You will notice that the first four notes had piano sounds on head only while the last one has sound on tail too so it would be better if its changed to circles instead Even it is, but I do want to leave it like that. Actually, players will click only its head, not them both (head and tail). And it will be more easier than everything in the diff too
3. 02:15:762 (5) - Even tho the vocal at 02:16:512 - is faint, i still suggest you making it clickable because the piano sound is quite emphasized in the song and also the new stanza starts here

Sinnoh wrote:

this is the last year in junior high school, so i have to focus on studying ;w;

Hard
00:57:762 (2) - Missing hitsound there is no any diff having any hs at here except normal.

DeRandom Otaku wrote:

I couldnt post yesterday cuz internet was meh, i wasnt expecting sinnoh's mod lol
[Liberation]

1. 01:19:699 - The whistle doesn't make sense to me since its loud and shouldn't be here in first place, maybe mistake ? Its also there in other difficulties so remove it from there too! Also 01:31:699 - same to enhance the drum sound
2. 01:40:137 (5) - Why not two kick sliders like 01:38:637 (5,6) - :c The whole part is jumpy and plays well but this slider kills the momentum if you hear closely, 01:38:637 (5,6) - has 1/4 piano streams (it's barely audible, you might not hear that), while 01:40:137 (5) - hasn't. So I expressed those sounds to be like that.

Lower diffs are fine.

1. All rules are exactly that: RULES. They are NOT guidelines and may NOT be broken under ANY circumstance.
2. Guidelines are important and should be followed in most maps. However, they are NOT rules, so they may be broken in special cases. If you want to break a guideline, ask yourself this: Does what I'm about to do make sense? Is it more fun to play like this compared to sticking to the guidelines? If you answer yes to both these questions, then it is probably okay.

1. Inconsistent epilepsy warning
   
   Listing

   Normal: 0
   Another: 0
   Insane: 0
   Lost's Light Insane: 0
   Hard: 0
   KittyAdventure's Advanced: 0
   Liberation: 0
   BoatKrab's Insane: 1
2. Inconsistent kiais

1. Low volume timing section
   
   Listing

   02:24:762 -
   02:25:512 -
2. Using 1/12 or 1/16 snapping divisor
   
   Listing

   00:17:158 -

1. Using 1/12 or 1/16 snapping divisor
   
   Listing

   00:17:158 -
2. Low volume timing section
   
   Listing

   02:24:762 -
   02:25:137 -
   02:25:512 -

1. Low volume timing section
   
   Listing

   02:24:762 -
   02:25:512 -
2. Using 1/12 or 1/16 snapping divisor
   
   Listing

   00:17:158 -

1. Using 1/12 or 1/16 snapping divisor
   
   Listing

   00:17:157 -
2. Low volume timing section
   
   Listing

   00:59:918 -
   02:24:762 -
   02:25:512 -

1. Low volume timing section
   
   Listing

   00:57:949 -
   00:58:418 -
   00:59:168 -
   00:59:918 -
   02:24:762 -
   02:25:512 -
2. Using 1/12 or 1/16 snapping divisor
   
   Listing

   00:17:157 -

1. Low volume timing section
   
   Listing

   02:24:762 -
   02:25:512 -
2. Using 1/12 or 1/16 snapping divisor
   
   Listing

   00:17:157 -

1. Low volume timing section
   
   Listing

   00:58:793 -
   00:59:918 -
   02:24:762 -
   02:25:512 -
2. Using 1/12 or 1/16 snapping divisor
   
   Listing

   00:17:157 -

1. Low volume timing section
   
   Listing

   00:58:418 -
   00:59:918 -
   02:02:918 -
   02:24:762 -
   02:25:512 -
2. Using 1/12 or 1/16 snapping divisor
   
   Listing

   00:17:157 -
   01:20:980 -

- Frontier - wrote:

Reminder:

1. All rules are exactly that: RULES. They are NOT guidelines and may NOT be broken under ANY circumstance.
2. Guidelines are important and should be followed in most maps. However, they are NOT rules, so they may be broken in special cases. If you want to break a guideline, ask yourself this: Does what I'm about to do make sense? Is it more fun to play like this compared to sticking to the guidelines? If you answer yes to both these questions, then it is probably okay.

[General]

1. Inconsistent epilepsy warning
   
   Listing

   Normal: 0
   Another: 0
   Insane: 0
   Lost's Light Insane: 0
   Hard: 0
   KittyAdventure's Advanced: 0
   Liberation: 0
   BoatKrab's Insane: 1
2. Inconsistent kiais

[Normal]

1. Low volume timing section
   
   Listing

   02:24:762 -
   02:25:512 -
2. Using 1/12 or 1/16 snapping divisor
   
   Listing

   00:17:158 -

[KittyAdventure's Advanced]

1. Using 1/12 or 1/16 snapping divisor
   
   Listing

   00:17:158 -
2. Low volume timing section
   
   Listing

   02:24:762 -
   02:25:137 -
   02:25:512 -

[Hard]

1. Low volume timing section
   
   Listing

   02:24:762 -
   02:25:512 -
2. Using 1/12 or 1/16 snapping divisor
   
   Listing

   00:17:158 -

[Lost's Light Insane]

1. Using 1/12 or 1/16 snapping divisor
   
   Listing

   00:17:157 -
2. Low volume timing section
   
   Listing

   00:59:918 -
   02:24:762 -
   02:25:512 -

[Insane]

1. Low volume timing section
   
   Listing

   00:57:949 -
   00:58:418 -
   00:59:168 -
   00:59:918 -
   02:24:762 -
   02:25:512 -
2. Using 1/12 or 1/16 snapping divisor
   
   Listing

   00:17:157 -

[BoatKrab's Insane]

1. Low volume timing section
   
   Listing

   02:24:762 -
   02:25:512 -
2. Using 1/12 or 1/16 snapping divisor
   
   Listing

   00:17:157 -

[Another]

1. Low volume timing section
   
   Listing

   00:58:793 -
   00:59:918 -
   02:24:762 -
   02:25:512 -
2. Using 1/12 or 1/16 snapping divisor
   
   Listing

   00:17:157 -

[Liberation]

1. Low volume timing section
   
   Listing

   00:58:418 -
   00:59:918 -
   02:02:918 -
   02:24:762 -
   02:25:512 -
2. Using 1/12 or 1/16 snapping divisor
   
   Listing

   00:17:157 -
   01:20:980 -

Modpost generated by Navosu v1.1.0.0 - Do not kudo this post

Surono wrote:

owo whats this
frontier best modder top purkish!

is there 2 fronties, orz idk idc nvm.

Surono wrote:

owo whats this
frontier best modder top purkish!

is there 2 fronties, orz idk idc nvm.

IceKalt wrote:

Is it happening

KittyAdventure wrote:

Congratulations with your first amazing ranked map, Frontier <3

KittyAdventure wrote:

Congratulations with your first disgusting ranked map, Frontier <3

KittyAdventure wrote:

Congratulations with your first amazing ranked map, Frontier <3