They almost got problem with the ending zzz
I try to remap some stuff because change to Light Hard
I try to remap some stuff because change to Light Hard
Nostalgic wrote:
nm from my q
[Insane]
- 00:16:292 (2) - nc for bpm change
- 01:11:074 (6,7) - stack for consistency unnecessary to make consistent zzz
- 01:17:262 (3) - nc for sv change not really a major change so no. you can see that i add nc at 01:17:637 (1) because it has faster sv
- 01:28:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - NO! pitch is dropping so why ds is increasing? Besides, this skystar-esque pattern is certainly not a good choice for an insane diff. why do i have to care? lololol
[Extra]- 00:29:637 (5,6,7,8) - these four notes should be more spaced compare to 00:29:262 (1,2,3,4) due to the rise of pitch why don't we increase spacing at the beginning? i want to keep consistency lo
- 00:39:574 (2,3,1) - if they are meant to be blanket then fix them pls no
- 01:16:699 // 01:17:074 they should definitely be clickable slider tail makes it audible so it's not that unnecessary to do that
- 01:24:762 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - i don't really get why this stream is suddenly that cramped low sound
- 01:31:699 certainly a clickable sound then i have to do with 01:32:074 too. Aren't I?
- 01:34:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - again pitch pls no
- 02:16:512 (1,2,3,4) - avoid this kind of overlaps why? is there any problem making sliders overlapped? It doesn't affect to any ranking criteria zzz. I prefer making these kind of overlap. It looks neat for me.
GL
- Frontier - wrote:
Nostalgic wrote:
nm from my q
[Insane]
- 00:16:292 (2) - nc for bpm change
- 01:11:074 (6,7) - stack for consistency unnecessary to make consistent zzz
- 01:17:262 (3) - nc for sv change not really a major change so no. you can see that i add nc at 01:17:637 (1) because it has faster sv
- 01:28:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - NO! pitch is dropping so why ds is increasing? Besides, this skystar-esque pattern is certainly not a good choice for an insane diff. why do i have to care? lololol
[Extra]- 00:29:637 (5,6,7,8) - these four notes should be more spaced compare to 00:29:262 (1,2,3,4) due to the rise of pitch why don't we increase spacing at the beginning? i want to keep consistency lo
- 00:39:574 (2,3,1) - if they are meant to be blanket then fix them pls no
- 01:16:699 // 01:17:074 they should definitely be clickable slider tail makes it audible so it's not that unnecessary to do that
- 01:24:762 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - i don't really get why this stream is suddenly that cramped low sound
- 01:31:699 certainly a clickable sound then i have to do with 01:32:074 too. Aren't I?
- 01:34:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - again pitch pls no
- 02:16:512 (1,2,3,4) - avoid this kind of overlaps why? is there any problem making sliders overlapped? It doesn't affect to any ranking criteria zzz. I prefer making these kind of overlap. It looks neat for me.
GL
Wow this is so arrogant. I can give you tons of examples to prove what you said is wrong but why bother? why do i have to care? lololol- Frontier - wrote:
why do i have to care? lololol
lol I just joking there.Nostalgic wrote:
Wow this is so arrogant. I can give you tons of examples to prove what you said is wrong but why bother? why do i have to care? lololol
deleted storyboard. looks nicer when there is no sb & not many players play the map w/ sb. (many players play with dim 100% )-NanoRIPE- wrote:
placeholder
normal
00:17:158 - why not put this green on the first note at 00:19:512 - which is more sense for me unnecessary
00:30:012 - you changed the sv at 00:33:012 - cause the beat become lower but you didnt do here no more background sound(?) here
00:37:512 - hmm the beats here looks not really dense imo (still low here) but you use 1,00x sv here xd? im prefer you changed it to 0,90x
00:57:762 (2) - move a bit down for avoid the linear flow (the current flow looks meh imo)
00:57:762 (2,3) - the piano seems strong here,maybe adds hitsound here? such as whistle or something
01:29:262 (4) - 2 circles for emphasis on vocal and drum more wanna keep it
01:54:762 (5) - move a bit to left for better flow ds
02:02:262 (2,3) - same as before,use whistle for the piano
the sv stuff really bothering me xd but as long its not unrankable i think its fine xd don't let me give the reason why lo xd
hard
00:32:637 (6,1) - im prefer you follow ds here cause increased ds when you in slow part it feels weird imo
00:58:137 (3) - move a bit down for avoid the linear flow
01:16:512 (1,2) - should be a jump here imo cause the beat of music start increase here
01:24:574 (5,6) - awkward movement imo,just stack (5) on (6) instead for better
01:27:199 (2) - 2 circles here cause in this part you use a lot of circle to emphatize the piano
01:28:512 (1) - hmm the rhythm not accurate imo.maybe a circle and then 2 circles at 01:28:699 - for emphatize the piano here wanna keep the consistent with 01:28:887 (2,3).
for hard maybe you should adds more jump for make the gap between hard > insane better there is already light insane which fills gap between hard and insane, so why? :3
insane
01:31:699 (5) - make clickable here cause the beat looks strong here don't know how to manage if i change to circles & i can't hear the specific sound to make it clickable
the structure on the whole diff looks ok but the gap between non kiai and kiai its really huge
i mean on non kiai you rare use jump and the rhythm is simple (you just focused on vocal only) but on kiai the rhythm so complex and dense,the jumps it looks like an extra diff than insane (sorry for bad english but i hope you understand)
so it makes unbalance because it's kiai so i think it deserves to make it harder than the non-kiai part.
ok thats it from me
GL!
Updato: https://puu.sh/wgRBp/aa1e54510b.rarPlaudible wrote:
BoatKrab's Insane
- 00:10:512 (1,2,3,4) - I feel you could space these a bit more in contrast to 00:13:512 (1,2,3). the spacing for that rhythm is too far for me, so... I won't fix this
- 00:17:024 (3) - Volume increase here is a cool idea, but it's way too much. Maybe like 20, 25, 30, 40? Something subtle would be perfect.
- 00:33:012 (1,2,3) - Improve aesthetic spacing here a bit, move 3 out. I can't even imagine how it be ._.
- 00:34:512 (3,4) - Line these up a bit better! heh?
- 01:44:262 - I don't really agree with this custom break, the strings start earlier anyways so it feels a bit random, personally would just get rid of it.
- 01:58:512 (1,3) - Line these up a bit better too.
- 02:01:887 (3,4) - ^
- 02:02:637 (2) - The tension with the strings and vocals make this a perfect candidate for a 3/4 slider. I just make the same pattern like 00:58:137 (2,3) -
- 02:21:762 (1) - Improve this loop here a bit, could be nicer: http://puu.sh/wcODv/5efb406d6d.jpg Nice idea, but i really don't want to make more circle in slowly rhythm.
- Sorry for aesthetic nitpicking, you really made this difficulty very well though. Just make these little things picture perfect and this'll go great. Great job boatkrab! \o/
thanks! :3
never get kd from this u motherDeppyforce wrote:
ad
00:13:512 - this part doesnt feel mcuh different from preevyet part tho its weaker u could do smh about density to emphasize it more the other diffs don't
00:45:574 (2,3) - cool flow can u move 3 head a bit down intent to make a circle with 00:48:012 (1) -. that's what kitty would say
00:58:887 (2) - can u somehow change flow on this so it doesnt feel same as 00:57:762 (3,4,1) - to emphasizes dat its not a part of ze instrument thing its also an intsrumenmt, isnt it?
01:15:574 (2) - ds i agree
01:34:887 (3,4,5,6) - try this reetm http://puu.sh/wVk1J/269f24f60a.jpg i agree
02:19:512 (1) - nazi head touching previous tail so it losk bad it my style!!1!1!!
2017-07-29 18:42 My Angel Rize: 00:33:574 (2,3) - เราว่าเปลี่ยนเป็นสไลเดอร์ดีกว่า ตรงนี้เริ่มไม่มีน้ำหนักละ
2017-07-29 18:42 - Frontier -: kk
2017-07-29 18:42 - Frontier -: :ok_hand:
2017-07-29 18:44 My Angel Rize: 01:18:012 (1,2) - เปลี่ยนสไลเดอร์ดีกว่า มันดูเข้ากับจังหวะตรงนี้อะ
2017-07-29 18:48 My Angel Rize: 02:09:574 (2) - เราตรงนี้ไม่ต้องวางอะไรดีกว่า มันขัดแปลกๆ :v
2017-07-29 18:48 My Angel Rize: หมดละนาย :v
2017-07-29 18:49 - Frontier -: sorry afk
2017-07-29 18:49 - Frontier -: 01:18:012 (1,2) - เราว่าที่เขาทำอย่างงี้เพราะว่าเขาจะเน้นตรงเสียงกลองตรงอันแรกอ่ะ
2017-07-29 18:50 - Frontier -: แล้ว slider ที่ 2 ก็เน้นตรง piano
2017-07-29 18:50 - Frontier -: 02:09:574 (2) - มีเสียงอยู่
2017-07-29 18:50 - Frontier -: thanks :3
2017-07-29 18:50 My Angel Rize: :c
2017-07-29 18:50 My Angel Rize: สรุปแก้แค่อันแรกเหรอ
2017-07-29 18:50 - Frontier -: อ่าห้ะ
2017-07-29 18:51 - Frontier -: โพสเลย เดี๋ยวยิงดาวให้
2017-07-29 18:51 My Angel Rize: ไม่เอาอ่า
2017-07-29 18:51 My Angel Rize: มอดกากเกิน
2017-07-29 18:51 My Angel Rize: อายเขา
2017-07-29 18:51 - Frontier -: ไม่เป็นไรหรอก
2017-07-29 18:51 - Frontier -: เขาอ่านไทยไม่ออก :V
2017-07-29 18:52 My Angel Rize: nooooo
2017-07-29 18:52 - Frontier -: xd
2017-07-29 18:52 - Frontier -: น่าา
2017-07-29 18:52 My Angel Rize: ok....
2017-07-29 18:52 My Angel Rize: sec
Unsnapped blanket isn't unrankable. It's just for aesthetics but not unrankable if don't.Error- wrote:
yay unloved
re:mod
nazi as always
- Liberation
00:07:137 (4,3) - possible blanket.
00:21:012 (1) - move to x:300 y:340 for better curve. https://puu.sh/wWC2f/f36b675608.png
00:24:762 (3) - why 1/2? use 1/4 to match the song. follow violin, not piano
00:52:512 (1,3) - not a perfect blanket (I know its only 1 pixel)
00:56:262 (6,7) - why don't you copy paste the objects from 00:55:887 (5) - ? it seems better imo, https://puu.sh/wWCcI/018d68bfbf.png i did it,
didn't t?
01:32:262 (3,1) - move out the tail and object of 01:32:262 (3) - to create better flow. this is already good flow
01:35:449 (2,1) - blanket? no
01:39:574 (4) - I know you can do the shape better. i prefer it
02:21:012 (3,1) - dunno about this but circular flow seems to be off. you try rotate 02:19:512 (1,2) - to 90 degree then you will know what i doing here
- Another
00:13:512 (1,2) - Fix up blanket already great blanket. try using 1/16
00:20:918 - feels weird when there's a clearly drum sound but no clickable object.
00:35:637 (4,1) - plz fix blanket already blanket
00:38:637 (3,1) - ^ ^
00:47:074 (2,3) - high chance of choke, try to move 00:47:262 (3) - to 00:46:137 (4) - 's head choke then why? i intend to emphasize the rhythm here since it's more dense than the previous part.
00:51:762 (3,1) - I dunno if you want to create a blanket here but if you want to, plz fix.
01:27:574 (6,1) - move out 01:27:574 (6) - 's tail a bit left for flow i intend to make (6)'s slider-tail to directly go to (1) to make and easier movement
02:02:074 (2,1) - another one :3 same reason
02:03:762 (1,1) - I liek to mention blanket
- Kitty
00:44:637 (3) - seems to be a sudden whistle here, remove plz?
01:04:324 (3,6) - there's a small overlap here.
01:05:262 (5,6) - I dont really sure about the flow here, seems diferent with others, try to create a straight line like https://puu.sh/wWDer/4af0d30d90.png might work. nah too bad
01:28:887 (2,3) - fix up blanket(?)
01:36:012 (1,1) - overlap, its visible in the playfield but 01:36:012 (1) has been completely faded out when 01:37:512 (1) comes. So i think it should be fine
go check out the diff again, there's a small problem with spacing, probaly becouse you're using DS and using small Grid Size. inconsistent ds is not unrankable
no kds coz I just remod this :d
plz rank this time plz find t2 for me this time
i dont say unsnapped blanket unrankable :thinking:- Frontier - wrote:
still wanna giv to u
reply laterUnsnapped blanket isn't unrankable. It's just for aesthetics but not unrankable if don't.Error- wrote:
00:56:262 (6,7) - why don't you copy paste the objects from 00:55:887 (5) - ? it seems better imo, https://puu.sh/wWCcI/018d68bfbf.png i did it,no you didnt :/ you only copy 00:56:262 (6,7) - but what I meant is 00:55:887 (5,6,7) - .
didn't t?
no kds coz I just remod this :d
plz rank this time plz find t2 for me this time
Thsnka!
b..but ;w;"Error- wrote:
no you didnt :/ you only copy 00:56:262 (6,7) - but what I meant is 00:55:887 (5,6,7) - .
what's this one here? xdError- wrote:
i dont say unsnapped blanket unrankable :thinking:
Error- wrote:
00:52:512 (1,3) - not a perfect blanket (I know its only 1 pixel)
Still didn't say it was unrankable tho. The term "unrankable" is literally "cannot under any circumstance be used in a ranked map", and is really just a general and basic requirement for the ranked section that is actually very easy to achieve. Doesn't have much to do with the quality of the map, which is what nominators mostly look at. (although ye blankets missing a pixel is kinda w/e imo lol)- Frontier - wrote:
what's this one here? xdError- wrote:
i dont say unsnapped blanket unrankable :thinking:Error- wrote:
00:52:512 (1,3) - not a perfect blanket (I know its only 1 pixel)
Yasaija 714 wrote:
m4m
I can not finely mod the map I was Qualified
KittyAdventure's AdvancedGood luck! Thanks!
- 00:53:262 (3,4) - I think this 1/1 slider is good
The sound in the interval should be expressed with a slider ok- 00:53:262 (3,3) - I think I can stack i prefer this
- 01:03:762 (2,5) - overlap
Certainly the slider has disappeared but I think it is easy to avoid this ok- 01:11:637 (4,1) - The distance is 1.60 because you are changing the speed of the slider the spacing is as same as the others so i think it should be fine
- 02:00:762 (3,4) - I think I can stack it's different voice so i think it shouldn't be stacked
Naxess wrote:
^ respond to this firstStill didn't say it was unrankable tho. The term "unrankable" is literally "cannot under any circumstance be used in a ranked map", and is really just a general and basic requirement for the ranked section that is actually very easy to achieve. Doesn't have much to do with the quality of the map, which is what nominators mostly look at. (although ye blankets missing a pixel is kinda w/e imo lol) im just kidding lol. Because he likes to point out the blanket issues (like in my paradisus-paradoxum). So i told him like that xd- Frontier - wrote:
smth
Minor stuff before we go
- [Hitsounding]
mostly looking at the top diff unless mentioned otherwiseOh also with the pm mod I did on the new advanced, you can actually give kds even though it's a remod, as the difficulty has undergone major remaps since then.
- 00:01:512 - You know, your sliderslide.wav doesn't actually apply since the samplesets for these lines are just "S" and not "S:C1". Because there's no custom, it will pick from the default sound files, including the default sliderslide. In order to fix this, add a new custom soft sampleset. Then add a soft-sliderslide4.wav and replace all "S" with "S:C4".We're adding a new one and not using "S:C1" because it would replace your whistles on 00:04:512 - etc with kick-drums, which'd be bad. ok
- btw add soft-sliderslide2.wav to avoid the long sliderslide thing at 00:35:824 - and others. ok
- 00:01:512 - Seems like other diffs have a whistle here. You should really use the hitsound copier thing to make sure they're all the same. Will help you fix this top diff and then you can copy downwards to make sure you don't miss anything. For example look at 00:07:512 - in Insane and notice how it's different from the same part in liberation. ok
- 00:20:637 - 00:22:137 - These sounds are here in the beginning but are apparently gone after this point. Try turning 00:23:637 - and 00:25:137 - into these as well. Basically sampleset -> drum, addition -> auto. 00:23:637 -i instead adding whistle here since the other diffs do and 00:25:137 -i instead leave it blank as the other diffs do too.
- 00:58:137 - Some sound here for matching feedback would be nice, as the song is pretty strong here, maybe put a clap or whatnot. instead adding drum-hitwhistle here
- 01:25:793 - Since you decided to skip adding whistles to this, and did a similar thing, probably intentionally at 01:24:855 - 01:26:355 - etc, I think removing the whistles from 01:24:293 - and 01:24:480 - would make things sound more consistent. 01:27:199 - Can stay as is, since it's more unique than the others, makes it stand out more like this too. ok
- 01:42:012 - Seems to fit better without the whistle tbh, as the impact itself is rather quiet like the previous two. ok
- 01:58:137 - This hitsound seems a bit out of place, could probably just remove it. ok
- 02:02:918 - This slider tail should either be silent or faint, not have a harsh and loud hitnormal. Try applying a short soft sampleset here. instead adding 5%-volume green line here
[Liberation]- 01:19:512 - Sound is different from previous parts so could reflect it with something like this, for instance. Up to you though. nice idea!
- 02:18:949 - Would just end these sliders on the piano. Skipping it like this might get confusing as the length of the slider is lower, yet it doesn't end on anything in particular unlike the others. ok
Let me know if some difficulty has it's own hitsounding and can't be copied to from the top diff There is BoatKrab's Insane that I can't change the hitsounds. Since he's making his own hitsound and I think I don't have permission to fix it. So I didn't fix it.
no i didn't ;( i used 구리리 in the titleKittyAdventure wrote:
Yessss, btw are you used グリリ in title? As M2U write it in his second album?
http://m2u.studio/ALBUM