1. Another (4.77 stars, 370 notes)
2. BoatKrab's Insane (4.29 stars, 371 notes)
3. Hard (3.27 stars, 282 notes)
4. Insane (4.26 stars, 355 notes)
5. KittyAdventure's Advanced (2.41 stars, 266 notes)
6. Liberation (5.03 stars, 390 notes)
7. Lost's Light Insane (3.7 stars, 331 notes)
8. Normal (1.81 stars, 156 notes)

- Frontier - wrote:

boatka's insane : wip 28.1%

- Frontier - wrote:

boatka's

-LynX- wrote:

just a quick mod for the highest diffs, i know the mapset is not completed yet but just wanna give my two cents since i love this song

Ex

1. 00:19:449 (1,2,1) - really don't think you should use 1/12 snapping, but since you did it for the insane diff too guess it's intentional? it's kinda unexpected as the player will just be recovering from a break and a relatively calm intro. i guess it emphasizes the hike in intensity? not sure about it though
2. 00:22:512 (5) - nc here and take away nc from 00:23:262 (1) - ? not take away nc at 00:23:262 (1) but i already nc at (5)
3. 00:27:762 (1) - remove nc? u did this here 00:24:762 (3) -
4. 00:29:262 (1) - ^
5. 00:29:637 (5,1) - may want to have a 1/4 gap between the sliders instead of a 1/8 cos of the large spacing between the 2
6. 00:35:824 (1) - remove nc?
7. 00:47:262 (1) - ^ dont think there's a need here
8. 01:18:199 (2,5,8,3) - there are strong sounds here (i think it's the strings?), might want to incorporate them into your pattern and increase spacing for these sounds imo it will lack with the other pattern & idk how to make too xd
9. 01:22:887 (1,2,3,4,1) - maybe move these down such that 01:22:887 (1) - is under 01:22:793 (4) - ? something like this: https://puu.sh/v9fUz/d840b19e31.png i think it helps to emphasize the change in the music
10. 01:27:199 (2,3,4,5,6) - i think the stream shouldn't have such low spacing, the music here is quite strong. looks nice though Yeah, it has low spacing. but i make a star-stream here. i think it'll be some challenging too.
11. 01:28:512 (1) - this is a different sound from these 01:28:699 (2,1,2,1,2) - , maybe place it somewhere else? listen to violin(?) sound. i think it's the same
12. 01:33:762 (1,2,3,4) - increase spacing here perhaps? music is picking up, and it can also prepare the player for the upcoming jumps I think music here kinda low, it shouldn't make jumps. xd
13. 01:35:262 (1,2,1) - increase spacing for these 3, the strings come in here I instead move (3) to make jumps. I don't increase spacing here because they're still a pattern with 01:34:512 (1,2,1,2)
14. 01:41:637 (1) - maybe start the slider here 01:42:012 - ? and map 01:41:637 - and 01:41:824 - . this is repeated in the insane diff too guess it's intentional too, but it's kinda weird to not map those to me, idk yeah, kinda weird xP
15. 02:01:980 (2,3,4,5) - maybe start the stream here 02:01:887 - ? it's kinda weird starting it on a blue tick i think
16. 02:19:512 (1,2,3) - i think it'd be cool to gradually decrease sv for these 3. so like it gets slower

i think the NCs are kinda confusing for the calmer parts too, maybe wanna make them more consistent

man this map was fun to play, all the best for your mapset

- Frontier - wrote:

i didn't want to ranked this.

BoatKrab wrote:

I disagree with this

KittyAdventure wrote:

<3

joker- wrote:

BoatKrab's Insane

1. missing source on BoatKrab's Insane k
2. 00:48:012 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - why do you put only circles on this part? BoatKrab told me that The rhythm in that part should be mapped with a jump circle and this would increase SR as well, This is why he did this

1. Add in BoatKrab's Insane source pls.
2. I think BG doesn't really fit to the song.Can offer something.

1. 01:02:262 (7) - off-screen
2. 01:35:074 (2) - off-screen
3. 00:06:012 (3,4) - Instead, there should be a similar slider - 00:04:512 (1) - .
4. 00:07:699 - If you put there a note, it will be much better.
5. 00:16:262 (1) - 1/3
6. 00:43:980 (2) - Starts here 00:43:980 - .
7. 01:18:762 (5) - NC.
8. 01:20:793 (1) - Why clap?
9. 01:21:199 (2) - NC. because SV changes.
10. 01:23:637 (4) - Slider's end should be without clap.

1. 00:07:699 - ^
2. 00:15:762 (1,2) - ^
3. 00:17:168 (1) - You can do slider repeat.
4. 00:35:824 (1) - Why there you use the slider, and EX spinner?
5. 01:43:512 (1) - In EX slider comes to here.

joker- wrote:

from modreqs

Normal

1. 00:04:512 (5) - missing NC
2. 00:06:012 (7,8) - DS error
3. 00:22:512 (5) - add NC?
4. 00:37:512 - sv0.5 is low compared previous sv0.75. can you increase sv to 0.6?
5. 01:15:012 - wow should avoid exelemely changing sv cuz of confusing beginner
6. 01:30:012 (1,3) - you can blanket more clearly

Hard

1. 00:16:324 (1) - i think dont need NC change rhythm so nc
2. 00:59:262 (1) - hmm... should avoid gimmicky changing sv on hard diff 02:03:762 (1) - same

Insane

1. 00:16:324 (1) - same as Hard same as hard too
2. 00:52:512 (5) - missing NC

Light Extra

1. nice work Thanks! ^^

Ex

1. 00:16:324 (1) - same as hard same as hard too
2. 01:02:262 (7) - off-screen
3. 01:24:387 (4,5) - too close on kiai part I think it's okay since sound here is low
4. 01:35:074 (2) - off-screen

pretty nice song~
sorry for shitty mod. GL Thanks a lot! ^^

Lama Poluna wrote:

Haiii

[General]

1. Add in BoatKrab's Insane source pls.
2. I think BG doesn't really fit to the song.Can offer something. Really? I think it's kinda okay

[EX]

1. 01:02:262 (7) - off-screen
2. 01:35:074 (2) - off-screen
3. 00:06:012 (3,4) - Instead, there should be a similar slider - 00:04:512 (1) - .
4. 00:07:699 - If you put there a note, it will be much better.
5. 00:16:262 (1) - 1/3
6. 00:43:980 (2) - Starts here 00:43:980 - .
7. 01:18:762 (5) - NC.
8. 01:20:793 (1) - Why clap? I didn't clap, did I?
9. 01:21:199 (2) - NC. because SV changes.
10. 01:23:637 (4) - Slider's end should be without clap.

[Light Extra]

1. 00:07:699 - ^
2. 00:15:762 (1,2) - ^
3. 00:17:168 (1) - You can do slider repeat.
4. 00:35:824 (1) - Why there you use the slider, and EX spinner?
5. 01:43:512 (1) - In EX slider comes to here.

Janpai wrote:

Lost's Light Insane

1. 00:07:512 (1) - It would have been nice if this is converted to three circles and arranged this way http://puu.sh/vdmjj/7964fe6164.jpg to emphasize the violin sounds at 00:07:887 - and the pianos too yes, ok fixed
2. 01:12:012 (5) - NC? fixed ><

Sorry for the shitmod xd
[]
Goodluck!

Come[Back]Home wrote:

Normal

*why does Normal not have those sweet sb-elements while clicking circles at the beginning? still wip
* Im unsure about the sv-changes in Normal, Normals normally dont have those, i suggest to use just one all the way through because it may be unrankable (sv-change = different spacing thus unrankable in Normal) will fix this
* 00:24:762 (4) - This one is touching the hp-bar, which is unrankable k
* 00:26:637 (2) - I would move this one up (just a bit) because it can be uncomfortable while playing to go all the way down imo k
* 00:57:012 (5,6,1) - I think it would be better to add a nc at (5) and remove the nc of (1) for consistency reasons (it also kinda fits) k
* 01:12:012 (1,2,1) - stuff like this is unrankable. distance between (1,2) is 1,2 and the between (2,1) its 0,7. Normals are supposed to have the same distance throughout the whole diff. You may check this diff for more like that. k
* 01:39:012 (3) - a nc here would fit pretty good imo k
* 02:15:762 (8,1) - I rly dislike the sv-changes in Normal because the srsly dont belong in a Normal fixed!

Overall it a cool diff, you just need to fix some distance thingys and ask someone if those sv-changes are okay Okay

Hard

* 00:01:512 (1,2) - I see people triggered because of multiple repeat sliders (i experienced it a lot already), you can change it, but i think its cool yeah, i think it's okay imo
* 00:29:262 (4) - Why dont you split this one into two repeat sliders? Let the other one start here 00:29:637 - and its better tbh k
* 00:49:137 (3,4) - Pls move (4) too 180/113 so it wont overlap in such an ugly way with (3) k

Insane

* 00:23:168 (7,1) - I wouldve placed those at 270/173 because it goes well with the direction the slider is showing to k
* 00:25:980 - Shouldnt there be a circle here too because of the sound? k
* 00:58:137 (1) - How about silence the sliderend of this one to emphasize 00:58:512 (1) - more? k i'll also fiw with other diffs as well
* 01:22:324 (1,3,4) - The overlap makes the pattern look messy somehow k

Light Extra

* 00:05:262 (1) - I would move this one too 256/44, it kinda looks better imo it looks kinda bad for me. it's overlap with (2).
* 00:48:762 (1) - why the nc? k i'll remove it



Okay, ill stop here, awesome map overall (i loved Ex!) Thank you! ^^
Good luck~ Thanks!

Janpai wrote:

As requested! What an orgasmic song <3

General

1. Please don't use volumes below 20% because those volumes doesn't make a lot of feedback to players. okay, i'll remove all green lines at spinner, but at the beginning and the end i think it fits with the song
2. Why there are 0.00x green lines? It doesn't really manipulate anything and Idk if it's unrankable but seems unnecessary for the gameplay. I think it's okay to leave it and I saw some maps ranked with 0.00x sv so i think it's not unrankable
3. Your yellow combo color is too bright for players who plays with BG. Well.. I think it's kinda okay. but i'll ask other modders for it.
4. Why BoatKrab's Insane uses lower OD and HP than Light Insane and Insane? Well.. I'll talk with Boat later.

Normal

1. 00:05:637 (2) - Put at 186|287? just a personal preference oh nice idea
2. 00:48:012 (1,2) - What's with the 1.80x DS? already fixed here
3. 00:58:512 (1) - Remove NC? for consistency It has been mentioned from previous mod tho
4. Flow and aesthetics is nice but the density of this diff is like an advance diff so let me evaluate the points why I said that so. First of all, the SV changes. Yes it's allowed on normals but it's been abused on the part of 02:16:512 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - it's doesn't really make sense if you consider the skill level of the newcomers who will play this diff. Second is your DS is not consistent, some varies from 1.20x then becames 1.80x (00:48:012 (1,2) - ) on the other parts and note that some sliders are fast on that pace that somehows makes the newbies stressed on playing the notes. The kiai's density is somehow feels like a diff spike, 01:34:512 (3,4,5,6) - these trains are too hard for beginners considering these as your lower diff and 01:22:137 (2,3) - beginners might be stressed on this note placement as they mostly play a 1/2 slider connections before this object. I think you need to buff the things down as for this is your lowest diff, you don't need to be in detail to emphasize the song wholely because these are meant to be played by the new players smoothly. First one is fixed because I decided to use same sv all diff. Second one, I'm gonna fix too! To reduce SR also. ;D

Hard

1. 00:07:887 - I prefer this to be a circle to take the initiative to emphasize the violin sounds 00:08:262 (2) here also a violin sound. so i think it's okay. imo
2. 00:35:824 (1) - Wavy sliders fits here as for the emphasis of vibration of the violin sounds k
3. 00:58:512 (1,1) - 02:03:012 (1,1) - This just looks so weird make something like normal diff :3
4. 01:14:824 (5,1) - Lmao that jump is pretty shocking and too sudden because you just finished from clicking slow sliders Because the song is suddenly emphasis the vocal so i think it kinda fits with the song

Insane

1. 00:06:012 (1) - Remove NC k

Sorry for the shitmod xd your mod is better than me xp
[]
Goodluck! Thanks!

Error- wrote:

M4M from my queue

[Lost]
00:08:824 (5,1) - Dont touch them? Fixed
00:24:574 (2,3) - I'd prefer to blanket them Fixed
01:12:012 (1,3) - Fix blanket~ Fixed
01:35:637 (3,1) - Blanket? Fixed
01:36:574 (3,5,6,1) - Its not a good idea to stack them.. Fixed


omg short and not really helpful mod, no kds if this is seriously not helpful.

Error- wrote:

[BoarKrab]
00:29:918 (5,1) - Why this doesn't have the same spacing? First, to be a sign for new rhythm. 2nd, to stack with 00:29:262 (1) - and if I move 00:29:637 (2,3,4,5) - to make 00:29:918 (5,1) - be the same ds... it would be too close for 00:29:262 (1) - and it will destroy this pattern 00:30:012 (1,2,1,2) - too ;w;

Overall this diff is pretty quiet than other diff, dunno why its 4.43*, there are more things to map in this diff, but it just seems undermapped imo
SR Deceiver hehe xD

but pp mapping lul

Smokeman wrote:

NM

pics are only examples

00:07:137 (2,3,4,5,1) - the flute thingy is not dominant enough to justify a 1/4 rythm here. Try a 1/4 repeatslider if you really want to emphasise it, although i think it doesnt really add to this part of the song since its still relativly calm I instead change to 1/2 pattern here.
00:10:512 (1,2,3,4) - you could flip 00:09:012 (3) - and move 00:10:137 (4) - further upwards so you have more space for 00:10:137 (4) - to move upwards. so then you can do this https://puu.sh/vdBZh/bb78cd9ca9.png oh! looks nice (btw wtf you use ar0?)
00:15:762 (1,1,1) - the timing on these is waaay off !!! You should let someone check and time it properly if you cant do it :[ previous mod already shows me how should i mapped here.
00:19:980 - add a note, cuz the violin has started playing here already : )
00:20:637 (6) - make this look a bit different from 00:20:262 (5) - (00:20:262 (5) - is more intense) sv contrast sounds like a good idea I keep DS here
00:21:012 (1,2,3) - spacing equality? Looks wierd when playing (i noticed atleast) / Make the contrast more noticable 00:21:012 (1,2) - shorter, 00:21:574 (2,3) - lardger spacing. example: https://puu.sh/vdzSD/08cc187538.jpg (1,0 to 1,7)
00:22:043 - shoudl be clickable imo It looks weird when I do this
00:22:512 (1,2) - same ^
00:23:168 (3,1) - ingame it is stacked like this https://puu.sh/vdzWC/e3b121aeab.png . i think moving 00:23:262 (1) - upwards (having it spaced) would emphasise the note a lot better. (bad)example https://puu.sh/vdA0X/dbd4e03800.png i made a triangle here
00:25:137 (7) - chaneg here change what?
00:25:887 (2,3,4,5,1) - having a buildup here seems like a good way to emphasise the growing intensity of this part in the song. Just a long spaced stream feels too dull. https://puu.sh/vdAlZ/635074ea0f.png
00:26:449 (2) - the intensity of the music is allready gone here 00:26:355 - . High spacing 00:26:262 (1,2,3) - just felt unfitting playing. ctrl+g 00:26:449 (2) - and readjusting the pattern a bit should do the trick
00:26:637 (3,4,5,6) - and the stack looks like this ingame https://puu.sh/vdA8R/6afe660ec6.png . I'd suggest somethign following the path of the previous slider like this https://puu.sh/vdAeT/61fb36ce40.png
00:27:387 (2) - move this closer to 00:27:012 (1) - and further down so the path to 00:27:762 (3) - follows the slider curve making it a much smoother transition (which i think it fitting, a good way to emphasise this part). e.g. x:100|y:364
00:27:762 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - you could have a lessen the spacing here according to the intensity of the intrumentation. (althought it be hard to get the pattern to fit so only do this if you feel like remapping a bunch of stuff ._.) So hard for me ;w; so I instead reduce overall. xD
00:29:262 (3,4,5,6) - in my opinion a 1/4 slider on 00:29:262 (3) - would make this stand out more since this sound in the music stands out aswell. Atm it just looks like the pattern you used for the melody 00:27:762 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - which doesnt quite for for this new thing here. https://puu.sh/vdB8G/0a536cf949.png ;w; Looks bad 4 me
00:32:637 (3,4,5) - having a bit of movement between 00:32:543 (2,3) - would make the transition less abrupt. I'll tried ;(
00:46:512 (1,2) - 00:46:980 (2,3) - 00:47:637 (4,1) - even though you chaneg the slider velocity here, i think it would add to the visuals if you moved these further appart making their borders clearer and lovelier to read :^D I didn't change sv here xd but i fix some
01:19:512 (1,2,3) - why reduce the spacing here ? The vocals are still going strong and it feels way off to slow down : ( I tried to increase the SV ;(
01:19:887 (3,2) - would also fix this overlap if you moved further apart from 01:19:512 (1) - and from each other. k
01:28:512 (1) - dont let this be similar to 01:28:699 (2,1,2,1,2) - since it shouldnt follow the same intensity (since the intense part starts at 01:28:699 (2) - ) Think of a way to distinguish them! I think it's okay tho
01:36:012 - 01:41:449 - should be kiai aswell ?

AR 9.2 feeks kinda overkill since this is such a low BPM song. AR9 should be fine and feels much better to play on imo (its not really a densly packed map either you know) okay

pm me if you have questions, didnt proofread what i wrote down xD

baaaai!

Error- wrote:

M4M from my queue

[General]
Enable epilepsy warning coz 00:19:512 and flashy thingy later after sb finish

[Normal]
00:52:137 (5) - x:340 y:236? instead move to x:348 y:248
else is fine

[Hard]
I highly reccomend you to avoid stack :3 I think it's okay when play in-game
AR 6 is too low :/ Increase to ar7
00:21:762 (7,8,1) - highly chance to unreadable
00:56:262 (4) - made this a red anchor could be better. or.. sorry, not my style ;w;

example

Yes, a Gero-ish slider

01:17:262 (1,1,1) - These are seriously unpredictable for a Hard diff.
01:35:637 (1) - First anchor might be around x:296 i instead moved to x:300
02:10:512 (1,2,1,2,3) - Nice idea, but i prefer mine

example

Not really sure about this tho, through its my opinion
If you do this, you might want 02:11:824 (2) - to keep at that place. Its up to you too

[Insane]
oh this is good~~ Thanks!
02:21:762 (1) - x:304 y:280?

[Light ex]
00:13:512 (1,2) - Blanket them perfectly
00:39:574 (2,3) - CTRL + <

Ex seems ok

omg short and not really helpful mod, no kds if this is seriously not helpful. Better than mine ;w;

Error- wrote:

but pp mapping lul

Error- wrote:

but pp mapping lul

Error- wrote:

but pp mapping lul

1. 00:19:512 (1,2) - 1/4 timing is very unexpected to play since it comes right after the break, the large spacing makes it look more like 1/2. maybe you can try like this http://puu.sh/veCpe/73de46c438.jpg
2. 00:20:262 (5,6) - try using something different for these two since they are mapping very different sounding instruments in the song
3. 00:22:512 (1,2,3) - maybe use the same spacing between them
4. 00:30:762 (1,2,3,4) - would flow much better if you switched them around, due to the angle that the previous circle is coming from http://puu.sh/veCFt/847498691c.jpg
5. 00:33:762 (2,3,4) - try to use a higher sv here. maybe it was intentional but i think its very easy to be confused for 1/4 because of the SV used earlier. like .75 is ok, you can switch the sv back for the next part, just increase a little here.
6. 00:43:512 (1,2) - try to shorten the slider to 3/4 and start the reversing slider at the white tick because the stronger sound is at the white so making the
   click for blue tick plays poorly imo
7. 00:46:512 (1,2) - ^
8. 00:46:512 (1,2,3) - this pattern is really cramped, some more spacing would be fine
9. 01:16:887 (1) - no need to nc this. like 00:31:699 (2,3,4) - 00:30:762 (1,2,3,4) - 01:18:762 (1,2,3,4) - etc.
10. 01:22:137 (5,1,1) - flow is not very good because the very small spacing between the sliders into a very large spacing for the next jump. also i think it should be closer to the next stream because musically its part of the next pattern as you can tell from the hitsounds. maybe you can try like here or something http://puu.sh/veDDi/db29cc33ad.jpg
11. 01:22:887 (1,2,3,4,1) - this curve can be better considering the placement of the previous circle
12. 01:25:699 (1,2) - these should be snapped to the 1/8 , i cant hear any 1/12 here so yeah
    

    Ranking Criteria Guidelines wrote:

    Sliderends of extended sliders should be snapped according to the song's beat structure. If the song is using a straight beat, 1/4 or 1/8 are recommended. If the song is using a swing beat, 1/6 or 1/12 are recommended. If the song has a beat in a different position from what was recommended, snapping to an actual beat always takes priority.

13. 01:25:887 (1,4) - maybe should avoid this overlap
14. 01:31:887 (1) - no need to nc
15. 01:33:199 (1) - no nc

1. 00:11:262 (2,3) - blanket can be better
2. 00:15:762 (4,5) - check the general section for what i think is the correct snaps here
3. 00:22:043 - missing an important piano sound here. maybe try extending the previous slider http://puu.sh/veFcq/32fa2307d9.jpg
4. 00:34:324 (5) - check ds
5. 00:35:262 (2) - i dont hear the reason why this is just one long slider theres no one instrument that goes this whole duration
6. 00:52:512 (5,6) - try moving 6 over a little so it kinda blankets http://puu.sh/veFke/045ee705f2.jpg
7. 01:21:012 (1) - i dont agree with this rhythm choice, its skipping over strong piano melody sounds at the red
8. 01:24:012 (1) - maybe you should try to include the triple that can be heard at the red tick
9. 01:35:637 (3) - i recommend using NC here because theres a really big difference in SV
10. 01:35:637 (3,1) - curves could match better

eeezzzeee wrote:

hi from m4m

[General]
not really a mod looking at the general stuff, just wanted to point something that applies to multiple diffs xd
00:15:762 - the snaps here should be consistent throughout all diffs to follow the song, even if it is GD map lol. after listening at 25% i think the best snaps are here http://puu.sh/veEVu/2b570b14e0.jpg (the first one is on 1/6 beat snap) Wow!! Really thank you! T-T
times are 00:15:762 - 00:16:012 - 00:16:277 - 00:16:652 -

[Ex]

1. 00:19:512 (1,2) - 1/4 timing is very unexpected to play since it comes right after the break, the large spacing makes it look more like 1/2. maybe you can try like this http://puu.sh/veCpe/73de46c438.jpg okay! that looks great!
2. 00:20:262 (5,6) - try using something different for these two since they are mapping very different sounding instruments in the song i instead change to 1/2 slider to make it as the other diffs do
3. 00:22:512 (1,2,3) - maybe use the same spacing between them okay
4. 00:30:762 (1,2,3,4) - would flow much better if you switched them around, due to the angle that the previous circle is coming from http://puu.sh/veCFt/847498691c.jpg okay
5. 00:33:762 (2,3,4) - try to use a higher sv here. maybe it was intentional but i think its very easy to be confused for 1/4 because of the SV used earlier. like .75 is ok, you can switch the sv back for the next part, just increase a little here. That's a great idea, but the next 1/2 slider (00:35:262 (2))have to change the sv as well? Also, the song in this part is kinda calm. The players may know that the slider should be slow as well so I don't think a players would be confused here.
6. 00:43:512 (1,2) - try to shorten the slider to 3/4 and start the reversing slider at the white tick because the stronger sound is at the white so making the
   click for blue tick plays poorly imo okay
7. 00:46:512 (1,2) - ^ oh im sorry. i couldn't fix here xd
8. 00:46:512 (1,2,3) - this pattern is really cramped, some more spacing would be fine Really? I think it's kinda far enough
9. 01:16:887 (1) - no need to nc this. like 00:31:699 (2,3,4) - 00:30:762 (1,2,3,4) - 01:18:762 (1,2,3,4) - etc. okay
10. 01:22:137 (5,1,1) - flow is not very good because the very small spacing between the sliders into a very large spacing for the next jump. also i think it should be closer to the next stream because musically its part of the next pattern as you can tell from the hitsounds. maybe you can try like here or something http://puu.sh/veDDi/db29cc33ad.jpg okay
11. 01:22:887 (1,2,3,4,1) - this curve can be better considering the placement of the previous circle okay
12. 01:25:699 (1,2) - these should be snapped to the 1/8 , i cant hear any 1/12 here so yeah okay
    

    Ranking Criteria Guidelines wrote:

    Sliderends of extended sliders should be snapped according to the song's beat structure. If the song is using a straight beat, 1/4 or 1/8 are recommended. If the song is using a swing beat, 1/6 or 1/12 are recommended. If the song has a beat in a different position from what was recommended, snapping to an actual beat always takes priority.

13. 01:25:887 (1,4) - maybe should avoid this overlap okay
14. 01:31:887 (1) - no need to nc okay
15. 01:33:199 (1) - no nc okay

i love the kiai part Thanks!

that's all from me, good luck! Thanks a lot <3

Battle wrote:

spoiler sb lol

eeezzzeee wrote:

hi from m4m
[Lost Light's Insane]

1. 00:11:262 (2,3) - blanket can be better fixed
2. 00:15:762 (4,5) - check the general section for what i think is the correct snaps here fixed
3. 00:22:043 - missing an important piano sound here. maybe try extending the previous slider http://puu.sh/veFcq/32fa2307d9.jpg fixed
4. 00:34:324 (5) - check ds fixed
5. 00:35:262 (2) - i dont hear the reason why this is just one long slider theres no one instrument that goes this whole duration fixed
6. 00:52:512 (5,6) - try moving 6 over a little so it kinda blankets http://puu.sh/veFke/045ee705f2.jpg fixed
7. 01:21:012 (1) - i dont agree with this rhythm choice, its skipping over strong piano melody sounds at the red fixed
8. 01:24:012 (1) - maybe you should try to include the triple that can be heard at the red tick fixed
9. 01:35:637 (3) - i recommend using NC here because theres a really big difference in SV fixed
10. 01:35:637 (3,1) - curves could match better nope ;w;

that's all from me, good luck!

Sotarks wrote:

hi m4m from q

[Ex]
imo i would change the diff name 'cause it's kibb's diffname trademark xdxd lol can i change my diff name to melancholy? xD But I will change my diff name to "liberation"

00:15:762 (1,2) - i would change the rythmn here to smth like this There isn't a consistent rhythm here. So, I would like to keep this one.

00:32:824 (4,5,1) - reduce the spacing would be prefered okay

00:46:980 (2) - would be prefered to change those into circle to mark the difference between 00:43:887 (2) - this. oh! that's nice.

01:09:574 (2,4) - can you use same spacing for those 2 ? sure

01:27:199 (2,3,4,5,6) - that plays really badly tbh Well, I saw on rrtyui's map and i think it's okay. but i'll fix

02:07:512 (1,2) - stack them like you did before okay

[Light Extra]
01:23:824 (2) - stack it xd okay

01:27:199 (2,3,4,5,6) - ye maybe u liek those patterns but it gives no emphasis by movment, i'd rather do smth more straight okay

01:31:512 (5) - 2 circles for those 2 claps emphasis? there is no clap here, isn't it?

really cool diff waow! Thanks!

[]
GL Thanks!

[-Crissaegrim-] wrote:

Hey o/ from Q
This is hard to mod

Ex

Ex

is this an extra?

00:07:887 (2) - i think you could make it just a normal slider and 00:08:637 - this clickable, it could fit better since music is getting higher on this point It still in calm section so it shouldn't make a normal slider here. And I won't add a circle at 00:08:637, It would lack the flow.

00:09:012 (3) - maybe make SV a bit higher, the same reason as above ^

00:15:762 (1) - lower SV could be nice isn't 0.35x kinda slow right now?

00:26:637 (1,2,3,4,1) - maybe distance this a bit more okay

00:29:262 (3,4,5,6,7) - you could play a bit with volume here, try raising it a bit matching the song, just a personal suggestion I might make it, but If i do then I have to do with other diffs and other parts that has the same rhythm too. Let me ask with GDer first.

00:39:012 (1) - i think this should be more distanced from last note, vocals have a little spike here I keep the DS here

00:44:449 (3) - imo a circle fits better 00:44:824 - here, slider into circle Make something similar

00:54:762 (3,4) - i think these two are too lineal compared to the rest of the section, talking about the pattern, maybe play a bit with 2nd slider so it doesn't
stay the same as first one? idk if i explained myself well sorry okay

00:58:137 (7) - maybe lower SV a bit? adding some contrast and reflecting vocals, only for this slider okay

01:04:512 (4,5) - you could do the same as 01:03:012 (1,2) - here maybe? okay

01:08:262 (7,1) - the same here but maybe move so it overlaps the same way I think stacking here isn't a big problem.

01:12:012 (1) - i think you can fix blanket okay

01:16:512 (1,2,3,4,1,1) - Beautiful Thanks!

01:19:324 (4,1) - maybe you could stick to the same movement you used before, this is more spiky than last ones well, i think it's okay

01:19:512 (1,2,3) - i think these should have more distance since you put some big intensity on hitsounds so i'll ctrl+g those

01:22:887 (1,2,3,4) - imo these should be 2 1/4 sliders instead of a stream because of the piano change, but this is pretty personal, just a choice the piano sound is the same with the previous one so i think it shouldn't do that.

01:23:637 (4) - hm you emphasized a lot this slider tail, probably a circle fits better okay

01:25:699 (1,2,1) - nice D, maybe lower tails volume a bit, it can be distracting somehow okay

01:33:199 (2,3) - this should be a slider imo, piano starts 01:33:387 (4) - okay

01:36:012 (1) - you could try to put this closer to last slider, i think this jump is a bit out of the map since you don't use it, just here I think it's okay to leave it.

02:03:387 - you miss some sounds, i think you just decided to map vocals but i'll still point it well, i think it's okay

02:07:324 (8,1) - maybe stack them? as you did 02:08:824 (3,4) - here and later fix from sotarks' mod already

Light Extra

Light Extra

00:22:887 (2) - maybe make it blanket or do the same as you did before blanket is bad idea here

00:30:012 (1,3) - don't make them touch maybe k

00:32:918 - i think this is more noticeable so it should be mapped imo k

00:40:512 (1) - i think this looks a bit meh for this section, maybe try not to make it that curvy what does meh mean? xD

00:50:824 (4) - this isn't necessary k

00:51:762 (3,1) - you could make a better blanket POTASSIUM

00:57:574 (1) - i think this should have more distance because intensity POTASSIUM
01:15:012 (1) - ^ i think it's okay here

01:17:262 (1,1) - i think this looks messy, try to change 2nd slider, maybe different shape or move it i think it's okay here, i think it's kinda nice btw

01:18:012 (1) - hm i think this spike is too big for the map overall ????

01:20:887 (2,3,4) - this isn't necessary at all, on an extra maybe, i think you should just put two 1/4 circles instead of this POTASSIUM

This song is so good, nice map Thanks!
Good Luck! Thanks!

paydayzcool wrote:

Hi there from t/579994, NM as promised,

I like the map, just a few suggestions.

Normal

01:04:512 (3) - This note seems too close to 01:03:012 (1). I reckon you should move it further away. That's okay
01:31:137 (2,3) - I think you should have the 3 blanket 01:30:012 (1) by moving the 2 a little further down. https://puu.sh/vghGY/e14a1a0d1b.png Isn't it blanket already?

Hard

00:32:262 (3) - Doesn't change the map a lot, but it does look nicer: https://puu.sh/vghV2/394c9f6da3.png okay
02:15:762 (7,1) - Blanket these notes? okay

Light insane diff is very well done. I can't see anything to improve.

Insane

01:18:387 (2,3) - Blanket these two sliders?okay

All the others diffs are good. Sorry if my suggestions weren't helpful, I tried my best. At least your helping is useful for me Thanks a lot!

Sinnoh wrote:

this is nice
i'd turn of skin whenever playing because the colours are too dark for me, could increase brightness for more people to play with colours i think it's kinda okay, not too dark for me xd
00:17:027 (1) - Lack of hitsound imo, should use whistle as well because keysound isn’t enough here wtf when did i changed this?

Insane
01:27:199 (2,3,4,5,6) - This actually flowed really well, you could potentially use it on the other diffs too since it’s something memorable xd
01:35:637 (1) - Bit of a combo breaker due to high spacing + SV Really? I think it's not a problem. but i fixed the spacing

Light Extra
this is the diff that I would normally play, more things about distances here
00:17:027 (1) - Just position this a little closer, clicked too late i think that's okay, but i may try to move (2) a little bit closer
00:27:574 (2) - this flows better if moved a bit to the right, bit too far in the corner i'll try
00:32:074 (2,3) - flow from 2 to 3 would be slightly better if 3 was moved up, so that it lines up better. could move 2 down or other things instead well, i tried to move (2) instead since i can't move (3) cuz it'll affect to DS
01:09:762 (3,4,1) - could probably make a better triangle with these I didn't intend to make a triangle here. I tried to make (3)'s slider blanket with (1)
01:15:762 (3,4,1) - doesn't flow too well here, angle is really wide. minor improvement but could ctrl-j 1, better visual flow with next pattern not look nice to me
01:16:887 (2,1,1) - flow is really killed here, here's a silly fix, try it maybe https://puu.sh/vgo9c/ac84b469b9.png (although kinda silly) I intead make something similiar to this.
01:18:949 (4,1) - this jump should not be this big, no sound on it idk where should i put here ;;
01:20:262 (1,1) - Hard to read because the head of the slider here is hiding behind 01:20:074 (2) - , I thin it's not a big problem and i think it's playable, but i'll stack (1)'s slider-tail to (1).
01:22:324 (6) - I get that it's an important part to emphasise, but it might be too jumpy in this general area. 6 would be a lot better if it was closer to the stream k
01:29:074 (2,1) - can you make this jump a bit smaller I'm afraid i can't (no explain sry cuz hard to explain)
01:29:449 (2) - drawing from pishi's newest video, this one has a clear kick on both head and tail, should make a triple for music imo leave it as a slider-kick also okay too
01:40:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - should be a little closer since not as intense imo, but opinion I think it's kinda near xd
02:16:512 (1) - this section DS increases compared to the previous?? should really change K

ExtraLiberation
00:01:512 (1) - Slider head/reverse/tail don’t really make sense, higher pitched violins should be clickable here. 1/1 sliders would suit more. There’s potential gimmicks you could play with SV here too if you did it, low sv on 00:01:512 (1) - and higher on 00:02:262 (2) - would match pitch changes well K
00:17:027 (3) - Could potentially do this since it’s the top diff https://puu.sh/vgsUt/0c6350708e.png I think i'll make somethink as boat's diff does.
00:48:387 (2,3) - would be better if you ctrl-g for spacing emphasis + would make flow angles on 2 and 3 the same (they’re different angle = different emphasis right now) but you don’t the snare too often so idk idk this looks bad for me and i wanna keep ds here too so. .-.
01:19:324 (4,1) - doesn’t flow too well, even for emphasis. 1 should at least be a little more to the right of the head of 1 holy. i'll make a new one now ;w;
01:20:074 (4) - could possible be simplified to a 3x since this has a lot of difficulty guessing flow here what 3x? SV or DS
01:22:137 (5,1,1) - Really breaks circular flow here, the stream should be going clockwise to follow flow POTASSIUM K
01:22:793 (4,1) - Could add more emphasis here no. i thin it's all the same so it don't need to emphasize imo.

Wanko wrote:

o/ Here's your mod

Lost's Light Insane:

SPOILER

00:45:012 (4) - move a bit up so the sliders don't touch fixed
01:02:262 (3,4) - Think it'll be better if you make these a mirror of 01:00:762 (3,4), it follows the pattern afterwards too i don't think so
01:53:637 (3) - slightly down so the sliders don't touch fixed
01:59:637 (3,4) - ^ fixed

Welp, that's it basically. Like I said, not much to work with. Great job guys, GL with getting it ranked.

Wanko wrote:

o/ Here's your mod

Not gonna lie, this is a great mapset and tbh I can't find much to work with as there's like 30secs of it being intensive with the rest being really straightforward and like 2* in difficulty lol, just a few overlaps that bothered me for the most part. So all of these are just suggestions as I haven't found anything 'wrong' with any of the difficulties really...
So if you feel I'm nitpicking, that's because the map is just this good.

Liberation:

SPOILER

01:24:574 (5) - could move this somewhere else, feels too close to the triple
01:40:887 (3) - either stack it with reverse slider or move 01:40:887 (3) - a bit to the left so the overlaps are the same instead moving (5) to stack with (3)
01:53:637 (3,4) and 02:11:262 (3,5) - I don't think these overlaps are necessary. imo they look nice & i keep ds.

Light Extra:

SPOILER

00:20:637 (4,1) - I don't think overlaps like this look good, especially when you do a different kind of overlap here 00:25:137 (4,1) . They didn't overlap each other. Just slightly but not overlap
00:51:762 (3,1) - Space them a bit so they don't overlap, the vocals get a bit more intensive here as well so it won't screw your emphasis.
01:04:137 (3,1) - Stuff like this, you're only using it here from what I can see, unless all these weird overlaps are your motif for this map, I'd recommend getting rid of them. Up to you~ they look nice to me
01:16:887 (2,1) - another one ^
01:39:574 (4) - I'd move it to x:228 y24 so the follow points go right through 01:39:012 (1) 's center.
01:57:012 (3) - move to x:28 y:326 so overlaps are the same on all 3 sliders keep ds here

Insane:

SPOILER

02:08:262 (2,5) - make these overlaps the same, and that's pretty much it... can't find anything in this diff

Normal:

SPOILER

00:34:605 (1) - I think extending this spinner to 00:36:762 works better maybe?
01:41:262 (5) - maybe place another reverse slider starting on red here instead so it follows the music better? 01:41:449 isn't very intense here so i think it's bad idea

Welp, that's it basically. Like I said, not much to work with. Great job guys, GL with getting it ranked. Thanks!

Sinnoh wrote:

@boatkrab what I meant, same ds but different rhythm
https://puu.sh/vgzab/e25a70bb96.png

Wanko wrote:

BoatKrab's Insane:

SPOILER

00:21:762 (3,4,1,2) & 00:28:512 (1,2) - Make these overlaps the same tell me why... .-.
00:54:012 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I don't like this part, would go with something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7805426 , it's a more natural jump imo I fixed on my own :3
01:21:012 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Make it smoother maybe?
01:57:012 (3) - I'd go with a bit more curved slider here. but I wouldn't ;w;
02:17:074 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - NCs like here 02:19:512 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) I can't do it, if it be 02:17:262 (2) - must be start a new nc and 02:17:074 (1) - will be only 1 on combos without a reason ;w;

Pappy wrote:

I'd suggest moving ft. Guriri to title instead of artist as in official video.Also 구리리 is Guriri's korean name so you can ad it to non-romanised.
reference
This is the only official metadata source rn so you'd better stick to this.

Also since i see you like adding a lot of tags, you can add korean, all of the artists are from there, arent they

wish i could mod but can't really help, sorry. Good luck on the map buddy

1. I will add guriri in the title!
2. but i think it's okay to not put her korean name into title cuz i see no map add that korean name (e.g https://osu.ppy.sh/s/128645) <, i know it's an old map xd. i will put that name into tags instead and i will also add her japanese name too

Deppyforce wrote:

this is pretty good
and i dont say that to anyone often THX

[g]
02:25:699 - theres glissando try end spinner here sounds more fitting k
this seems like last goodbye farewell type song more than liberating so idk if u wanna change diff name here the reason why i name this diff like this cuz "2. ดอก Marigold หรือดอกดาวเรืองนั้น มีความหมายถึงความสิ้นหวังและความเศร้าโศกอันเนื่องมาจากการสูญเสียความรักไป". so i name it like this xd

[sb]
check ur lyrics in some certain places idk where u copied this from but i got it from this official vid
01:11:824 - it doesnt have 'be' in song
02:07:512 - this says 'i love you too always deeply'
02:16:512 - this doesnt have 'i will '

[liberation]
01:22:324 (1) - remove nc k
02:02:074 - why is there a random green line here lol idk boat did it xd

[light ex]
00:46:137 (4,1) - nazi blanket 1s end get too close sorry
00:54:012 (1,2) - edit this part a bit and try to avoid this overlap http://puu.sh/viYuU/058b5893f2.jpg i instead moving (3) away
01:41:637 (1,2) - can u make it easier by place it over slidertails location instead of the head cuz its weaker sound http://puu.sh/viYDH/ef7953bc78.jpg k
02:09:387 (1) - literally no sound k

gl

Deppyforce wrote:

dam i woulda wanted to gd extra for this
and i dont say dat often also IF YOU CAN MAKE SOMEKIND OF 5.1* THEN YOU GO!!!!!

Deppyforce wrote:

[เรือ in]

อ็อบเจ็ค ฟิกซ์
00:44:168 - could map 1/4 for dat flute thing I didn't follow the flute for the first
01:15:012 (1) - pls dont do this, fucing r u i n e d especially with this stack leniency http://puu.sh/viYWq/745991765a.jpg
01:24:668 - no piano here atleast change previous note to kickslider or smh to follow it properly มันขาดตอน ถถถถ ;-;

gl

• 
  [General]

1. Might want to silence the soft-sliderslide, kind of disrupts the calm in some parts of the song, for example 00:13:512 - . Here, take this 44 byte blank wav.
2. Might want to raise the HP of boatkrab's insane to fit the settings of adjacent difficulties.
3. The snapping of 00:16:012 - is 1/12 in some diffs and 1/16 in others, try keeping these the same. Personally I think 1/16 sounds more accurate, but better to check with others as well.
   
   [Normal]
4. 00:45:012 (3) - Try moving the red anchor to the slidertick to reflect the sound at 00:45:387 - , like 00:39:012 (3) - does.
5. 00:59:262 - This SV change doesn't do anything atm, but I'm pretty sure newer modders may catch on to it and think it's a problem, so consider removing it.
6. 01:53:449 - This density is a bit high for being such a calm section. Especially in comparison to the others. Try replacing that rhythm with a circle instead, to lower the density. Take a look at 01:59:637 - , for example.
7. 02:02:262 (2) - 00:47:262 (5) - If possible I would've liked for distinct sounds like these to stand out by having both impacts be circles, rather than being a slider like the rest. Although, it might be beyond the scope of rhythmical density intended for the difficulty. Even so, there is headroom available in terms of SR.
8. 02:19:512 (1,2,3,1) - Instead of continuing this slider train, I would have notably reduced SV here, along with density. Could try something like this for rhythm.
   
   [KittyAdventure's Advanced]
9. 00:01:512 - Some conflicting custom sample settings here, unify them to avoid technical issues in the map.
10. 00:03:574 - This rhythm feels a bit too dense for being the intro, and this is actually more intense than how the Hard is mapped here. The constant use of circles in between sliders becomes slightly repetitive, especially when used consecutively like this. The contrast between 00:10:512 - and 00:13:512 - is kind of lacking, as well. Because of the repeating pattern of 1/1s and circles, two 1/2s like 00:15:012 (5,6) - also becomes a bit unexpected. This is a lot of things for one section, so would suggest you rework this. Try lowering the overall density a bit to bring more contrast between this part and 00:19:512 - .
11. 00:21:949 (2) - This impact happens at 00:22:043 - , and not the red tick. Would start a slider from 00:21:762 - , where a prominent snare exists and a click would be more predictable instead. Additionally, would turn 00:22:137 - into a 1/2 slider or circle with 1/1 gap, as 00:22:324 - isn't very strong.
12. 00:22:512 - is also pretty much the same as 00:21:762 - 00:28:512 - etc, but with a different pitch, so would make if rhythm was somewhat similar.
13. 00:25:324 - Preferably the circles right before prominent sounds should be placed differently than others, for the sake of making it stand out properly. In this case 00:26:074 (2,3) - is pretty much arranged in the same way 00:25:324 (3,1) - is. Could otherwise stack 00:25:324 (3) - on 00:25:512 (1) - . There's another case at 01:05:824 (6) - , where things are both stacked and unstacked at times, so would change the rhythm, sort of like 01:11:262 (3,4) - 01:08:262 (3,4) - were done.
14. 00:28:512 (1,2) - For sliders, there's usually a general rule of thumb that white ticks take priority over red ticks, and red over blue, etc, unless the song suggests otherwise. So swapping these rhythmically would make it seem more natural to play, especially since 00:28:512 - is stronger in this case, and 00:28:699 - weaker than 00:28:887 - .
15. 00:33:012 - This is where density should decrease, but it seems to continue like it did before, which kind of fails to express what the song is doing here. I realize 00:33:762 - is a rhythm technique to switch instrumental layer, but it's usually discouraged in calmer sections, as it requires the player to focus more, which again, goes against how the song sounds here. Could instead try something like this.
16. 00:44:074 (2) - Here, 00:44:074 - is weaker than 00:44:262 - . I realize you're following the flute, but the flute is no longer heard at 00:44:262 - , where another instrument starts. This leads to players expecting it to be clickable, hence why it feels awkward in gameplay. Would try this instead, where vocals are also prioritized.
17. 00:57:762 - Two distinct impacts, so would try two circles, where the second could be stacked over 00:58:512 (1) - , to emphasize the transition. Applies to 02:02:262 (3) - as well.
18. 01:35:262 (4,5) - Could swap these rhythmically to emphasize 01:35:637 - 01:35:824 - , as the current is the same way 01:33:762 (3,4,1,2) - are done, for instance, which wouldn't be good contrast.
19. 01:41:637 - It's important that rhythm density correlates to the intensity of the song. Having things like 01:42:199 (2,3,4,5,1) - , may fit the individual sounds, but it doesn't fit the song at the time when comparing this section to others. Could try making use of some SV changes as well to make lower density sections feel slower.
20. 01:43:512 - This part is a break in all other difficulties. Are you sure you don't want any breaks in the map? It is still around 2:30 in length.
21. 01:58:512 (1) - Refrain from cramping sliders this much, this looks really bad lol
22. 02:16:512 - This starts off well, but the density quickly starts spiraling into 02:18:012 (1,2,3,4) - and some really dense stuff like 02:20:262 (3,4,5,6) - . Would highly suggest you reconsider parts like these.
    
    Calm parts may need some work, some sliders start on weaker sounds than they end or roll over etc. There's some things to look into here, although it is relatively new so I suppose it's to be expected.
    
    [Hard]
23. Going to ignore the gap here since we're waiting for kittyadventure's adv. aand it's here
24. 00:21:762 (7,8) - 00:22:512 (1,2) - Having two different ways to indicate 1/4 may get slightly confusing. These are also the same sounds so having both the same would make sense. Same would apply to 00:28:512 (1,2) - , depending on what you do.
25. 00:35:262 (5,6) - This would work better if they were rhythmically swapped. Generally priority will go white > red > blue etc, unless the song suggests otherwise, meaning 00:35:262 - would be the start of the slider, and 00:35:637 - would be the circle. This way you'll also rhythmically emphasize 00:35:824 - through contrast.
26. 00:44:449 - These sliderends felt kind of awkward after previously clicking on the same sound, 00:38:449 - , additionally, 00:44:262 - might want to be covered. In it's current state, this will probably cause players to lift too early. Slider is just a bit too long, and you'd expect to click on the beginning of a new stanza.
27. 00:47:262 (6) - Could replace this with two circles instead to give contrast from 00:46:512 (5) - , in order to reflect the more prominent sounds here, similarly to what was suggested in Normal. Would also apply to 02:02:262 (2) - .
28. 01:20:262 (7) - 1/2 stacking should preferably not be done in conjunction with 1/4, 01:20:918 (9) - . Could otherwise just unstack the first stack like this. Break in flow will work as emphasis for the sound.
29. 01:26:449 - Could end the slider here instead, to cover both that impact as well as 01:26:543 - .
30. 01:27:199 (2,3,4,5,6) - 5-note streams might be a bit over the top for a Hard. It's sort of edge-case so would recommend you try something else if possible.
31. 01:53:449 (2,3) - In this case the white > red priority for sliders applies, so basically swap them rhythmically.
    
    [Lost's Light Insane]
32. 01:02:262 (3,4) - Might want to stack this considering that 01:00:762 (3,4) - 01:03:762 (3,4) - 01:05:262 (3,4) - etc are stacked, being part of the same concept.
33. 01:21:387 (1) - This NC looks a bit out of place.
    
    [Insane]
34. 00:22:137 (4,6) - Could avoid this overlap by changing the pattern of the second one.
35. 00:24:012 (1,2,3) - Seems like a lot of notes are sort of cramped together, which sort of damages the visual appeal. Try spreading them out, in this case moving 00:24:012 (1) - downwards or whatnot.
36. 00:57:762 (1,1,1,1,1) - This is a lot of NCing, try removing the new combo on 00:58:137 (1) - .
37. 01:04:512 (4,5) - Not going to stack the tail and head like 01:03:012 (1,2) - 01:08:262 (7,1) - 01:11:262 (7,1) - were done?
38. 02:07:512 (1,2) - 02:09:012 (4,5) - Similarly to how many of the other tails and heads are stacked, could stack these too for visual consistency.