1. Easy Jijou (1.41 stars, 125 notes)
2. Hard Jijou (3.13 stars, 285 notes)
3. Insane Jijou (4.35 stars, 384 notes)
4. Normal Jijou (1.99 stars, 172 notes)

Sendji wrote:

I felt uncomfortable on 00:40:910 in the Insane difficulty. The circle's placement makes me hit it earlier than it is.

Down wrote:

매우 간단한모딩

[General Setting]
01:07:742 (1,1,1) - 전체적으로 이부분에 뉴콤스팸을 사용하셨는데 딱히 강조되는 음도 없고 하니 풀어주시는게 좋다고 생각해요. fix

[Easy Jijou]
■ 00:17:432 (2) - 좀더 좋은모양을 만드실 수 있을듯 합니다.fix
■ 01:12:214 - 이 박자 빠지니까 매우 어색하게 들립니다. 01:12:401 (2) - 를 땡겨 오시고 01:13:332 - 노트를 추가하시는게 좋을 것 같아요.fix

[Normal Jijou]
■ 00:51:904 (2) - 해상도나 스킨에 따라 다르겠지만 저의 화면에서는 체력바에 닿습니다. 약간 내려주세요.fix
■ 다음부터 노말에서는 스택을 조금씩 사용해주면 더 좋은맵이 나올 것 같습니다.

[Hard Jijou]
■ 00:33:084 (1,2) - 여기서 00:33:643 (2) - 를 좀더올려서 간격을 벌려주세요. 지금은 너무 붙은 것 같아요. 최소한 00:33:643 (2) - 를 컨G시켜서 1.20x의 간격이 나올정도로는 벌려주셔야 안정감있게 보입니다.fix
■ 00:59:916 (1,2,3) - 직선플로우라서 치기 어려울지도 모르겠네요. 스택
■ 01:19:854 (3,4) - 여기도 너무 붙어보입니다. 물론 수치상으로 간격은 다른곳과 비슷하지만 외관상 좋지 않습니다.fix

[Insane Jijou]
■ 00:16:873 (2,3) - 이 두노트는 스택시키면 노래를 표현하기 더 좋을 것 같아요.패턴상..
■ 01:27:866 (5,6,1) - 여기도 너무 직선플로우인데 대칭패턴이라 고치기 애매해도 한번 고려해보세요.가능하면 고려해볼게요.

컼 다쓰고보니까 몇줄안되는군..
굿럭!

1. 00:06:997 (3,1) - make them parallel
2. 00:24:885 (4,1) - ^
3. 00:21:158 (3,4) - turning 3 into a reverse slider and removing circle would make this more comfortable to play for new players.
4. 00:29:730 (2,3) - fix blanket
5. 00:37:183 (4,1) - ^

1. 00:26:376 (2,3) - parallel
2. 00:15:196 (4) - you may want to reconsider these sliders, these are fine on something like easy, but for normal you are ignoring alot of the strong beats on red ticks such as 00:15:755 -
3. 00:50:972 (1) - finish on head
4. 01:01:220 (4) - shorten to red tick and add circle on white

1. 00:15:941 (3,4) - this stack doesnt make sense with the music, you should un stack them.
2. 00:38:488 (3) - maybe stack the tail on the 4, instead of the 3, looks much better during play
3. 00:45:009 (1) - jump is too big for going into the slow section of the music
4. 01:01:220 (1) - there's actually no sound where the slider's tail is.

1. 00:21:158 (1,2) - this is really meh flow for a 1/2 rhythm, you should reconsider. maybe move the 2 a little further away
2. 00:56:748 (6,1) - maybe reconsider, this is very random 1/4 jump since you have not used them in the map at all before this., and it is a very large one at that.

Marianna wrote:

Hellow Your avatar is soooo cute nyaaaaa

Easy

1. 00:04:388 (4,1) - 01:32:339 (4,1) - This overlap can be harmful, I've had many problems with this kind of thingI saw this in Sonnyc's map
2. 00:41:469 (2) - This can be very difficult for beginnersfixed
3. 01:13:332 (3,4,5,6) - Many cicles so are very intense for beginnershere's really intense part in my interpretation
4. 01:40:910 (1) - The NC is irrelevant please remove iti'll consider it.

Normal

1. 00:03:270 (4,5,6,1) - This is very intense, you can only remove it 00:04:202 (5) - I'll consider it.
2. 00:50:972 (1,2) - This can be easily not remarkable by playersfixed
3. 01:40:910 (1) - Same than easy

Sorry for the short mod >.<

Setz wrote:

m4m return

[Easy]

1. 00:06:997 (3,1) - make them parallelfix
2. 00:24:885 (4,1) - ^fix
3. 00:21:158 (3,4) - turning 3 into a reverse slider and removing circle would make this more comfortable to play for new players.I'll try if I can
4. 00:29:730 (2,3) - fix blanketfix
5. 00:37:183 (4,1) - ^fix

[Normal]

1. 00:26:376 (2,3) - parallelfix
2. 00:15:196 (4) - you may want to reconsider these sliders, these are fine on something like easy, but for normal you are ignoring alot of the strong beats on red ticks such as 00:15:755 - I'll consider it.
3. 00:50:972 (1) - finish on headfix
4. 01:01:220 (4) - shorten to red tick and add circle on whitefix

[Hard]

1. 00:15:941 (3,4) - this stack doesnt make sense with the music, you should un stack them.fix
2. 00:38:488 (3) - maybe stack the tail on the 4, instead of the 3, looks much better during playfix
3. 00:45:009 (1) - jump is too big for going into the slow section of the musicfix
4. 01:01:220 (1) - there's actually no sound where the slider's tail is.I think it's okay

[Insane]

1. 00:21:158 (1,2) - this is really meh flow for a 1/2 rhythm, you should reconsider. maybe move the 2 a little further awayfix
2. 00:56:748 (6,1) - maybe reconsider, this is very random 1/4 jump since you have not used them in the map at all before this., and it is a very large one at that.fix

Lasse wrote:

m4m4m4m4m

[general]
hitsounding would benefit so much from actual whistles at many spots like 00:42:401 - , but you did the "whistle as kick" thing :/
also on stuff like 01:08:115 (4,5) - where you out 3 finishes in a row when there isnt really anthing to support it, real whistles would be great there

[insane]
00:01:780 (1) - 3/4 slider to follow guitar doesnt work here as it skips the rather strong guitar on the 1/2 tick lolfix
00:29:730 (5) - similar here with skipping strong vocal on the 1/2 tick it feels a bit weirdfix
00:40:910 (2) - this is so easy to mistake for 1/2 ..fix
00:58:425 (1) - some more spacing to emphasize finish and all would be nicefix
also could increase 00:59:171 (3,4,5,6,7) - a bit to go with the building up music
01:02:525 - while I dont like the 1/8 at all here, at least shorten to the red tick cause the piano stops therefix

[hard]
00:04:295 - you could actually map this 1/4, it works fine since it's sldier-circle-slider => pretty easy to play#well..
00:40:537 (1) - would work better with some emphasis (spacing), you could make 00:40:165 (4) - a 1/2 slider too, to make the ryhthm easier thenNow I have no space, I'll consider it positively
00:43:891 (2,4) - perfectly stacked sliders can be a bit hard to read for this difffix
00:46:314 - stacked vocal under weak beat doesnt wor kthat well => http://i.imgur.com/UF6uYTK.jpg fix
00:53:208 (3,4,5,6) - building up spacing would work so well here, at least put a jump on 00:53:953 (1) - and 00:56:935 (1) - fix


[normal]
00:04:202 (2) - density feels a bit high here, could just delete this note again..fixed
00:34:575 (1,2) - bit too undermapped for a normal diff lol, doesnt even really fit the vocalsfix
01:25:258 (4,5,6) - ony 3x 1/2 note in a row, kinda spikes difficulty a bitfix

[easy]
00:17:432 (2) - overlaps itself a bit too much for easyfix
01:05:879 (1) - maybe too ^ // 01:37:183 (3) - i'll consider it
00:28:612 (1,2,3) - really eas to misread cause 1 leads towards 3 // 2+3 are both visible while on 1 // same spacing to 1fix
00:37:183 (4,1) - similar here, but not as bad // 01:20:040 (4,5,1) - I'll consider it.
01:13:332 (3,4,5,6) - so many 1/1 in a row ;_;fix
01:40:165 (1,1,1) - nc spam isnt needed herefix

gl

100bit wrote:

Hey from my queue, my name is Max 100bit, and this is my mod!
Well, opinion of modder is opinion of modder.
Do not judge strictly, I could be wrong.
And yep, I am just learning. My english is bad, so sorry for googletranslate.

Song and beatmaps

Your BG-ratio isn't 16:9, change to 1366x768 (not enough 1 pixel /facepalm/)soon fix
You need "Jujou" in name of diffs? in japanese, it's correct

Easy

00:04:388 (4,1) - i think overlap here isn't good idea. 00:04:761 (1) - Ctrl+J and Ctrl+G and make blanket with 4 (fix 00:06:252 (2,3) later)i saw it in one god mapper's set
00:15:196 (3) - what about move red sliderpoint to 00:15:755 ? (like in [url=http://puu.sh/oZTaG/0b2930814b.jpg] (p.s. i can't change already finished sliders)well.. no reason to..
01:32:339 (4,1) - fix this overlap too
01:34:202 (2,3) - make like in %image%no reason to..
01:41:655 (1,1) - spinner should be at least in 1/2 before last note, so move it to 01:41:842consider it

Normal

Fix all mistakes with Distance Spacing: Ctrl+Shift+A -> Check distance snapall fixed
00:15:196 (4) - move red sliderpoint to x=360 y=196I think that's nice
00:27:866 (4,5) - make like in 01:31:966 (4,5)well
00:43:891 (2,4) - where is my hitsounds???

Hard

01:00:661 (4) - make two sliders instead one and don't stack 01:00:661 (4,1)well
01:03:829 (3) - move to x=298 y=222I have different intention
01:07:742 (1) - remove ncneed for emphasis
01:10:165 (1,2,3,4,5) - beginning of sliders in red ticks is very strange and doesn't correspond to music. Can you fix it?according to vocal sound
01:34:202 (1,2,3) - make another singletap pattern like triangleit's more suitable i think
01:34:947 (1,2,3) - ^

Good luck!
{end of mod}

Lami wrote:

Easy

00:21:158 (3,4) - 뒤에 노트들은 (00:22:649 (1) - ,00:25:630 (1) - )보컬상관없이 그냥 무난하게
흰선에 넣으셨는데 여기만 구지 빨간선에 끝내신 이유가 있나요.
저는 깔끔하게 흰선 추천드립니다.fix
00:33:084 (3) - ^fix
01:11:469 (1,2) - 각도가 서로 어긋났네요. 1번과 2번슬라를 겹쳐보시면 알수있음fix

Normal

00:50:972 (1,2) - 노트 슬라로 가리는건 확실친 않지만 노말에선 안될거같아보이는 패턴이네요.fix
된다 하더라도 슬라가 길고 노트까지 가려버려서
노말수준의 플레이어는 다음노트를 칠 타이밍을 잡기 많이 어려워보입니다.

개인적으론 01:28:239 (3,4,5) - 이런식으로 1/2간격 노트를 늘어놓는건 썩 좋아보이진 않습니다만은..
이유는 보기도 애매하고 플레이도 좀 불편하거든요.
저는 당연히 다 겹치던지 1/2슬라로 대체하는걸 추천드리고 싶습니다만은...fix


Hard

01:00:661 (4,1) - 이런건 완벽한 스택보단 좀 벌려놓는게 리딩측면에서 훨씬 편해요fix
01:29:357 (5,1) - ^fix
01:19:109 (1,2,3) - 노래상으로 2-3보단 1-2가 점프 더 커야 될거같네요 fix

Insane

00:04:202 (4,5,6) - DS 불일치.
x0.02정도라도 플레이어입장에선 나름 잘보여요...
이후 3연타들도 똑같이 ds하셨는데 복붙하신거같은 기분인데
만약 의도된거라 하더라도 구지 0.02라는 차이를 줘가면서 이렇게 만드는건
오히려 퀄리티 저해요소라 생각됩니다.
또한 만약 이대로 가실꺼면 뒷부분 01:32:152 (4,5,6) - 이런부분도 똑같이 만드셔야되요그냥 다시보니 맘에 안들어서 스택시켯습니다
00:17:619 (6,7) - 너무 작아서 안들려요.
드럼소리가 명백히 들리는데 20%는 너무 낮다고 생각되요35
00:36:345 (1,2) - 블랭킷이 많이 일그러졌네요
S자 슬라모양을 좀 손봐야할 필요성을 느낄정도로요.fix
00:46:873 (3,5) - 3번노트와 5번노트의 시간적 간격이 충분하지않아서 말끔히 읽히지 않습니다.
리딩측면에선 많이 좋지않은 배치라고 말씀드리고싶네요.fix
00:49:295 (4,1) - 딱히 강조음도 없는데 이런 상당히 큰 점프를 쓰는건 좀 과하다고 생각됩니다.
01:04:947 (3) - 노래랑 매칭되지않는 노트.작지만 드럼소리도 있고 보컬도 있어서
노트 + 슬라같은 표현이 더 노래랑 맞다고 생각됩니다.fix
01:39:978 (6,1) - (1)이 매우 강한음인데 너무 노트가 붙어있네요.
원하시는 패턴이 있는거 같아보이기는 한데,구지 안티점프를 써가면서까지
이런 패턴을 유지하는건 썩 추천드리고 싶지않네요.fix

• Easy

1. 00:03:270 (3,4,1) - 00:09:233 (3,4,1) - 00:13:705 (1,2,3) - 01:25:258 (3,4,5) - 이런 일직선 모양( http://puu.sh/p3hue/d21e122a37.jpg )은 가능하면 피하는게 좋을것 같은데 너무 많은것 같아요. 이런 식 ( http://puu.sh/p3hxL/0d56b4770f.jpg ) 으로 조금 비뚤어 주면 어떨까요
2. 01:09:978 (2,3) - 담요 조금 삐뚤
3. 01:19:295 (3,4,5,1,2) - 여기 모양이 조금 아쉽네요. 1번이 5번 담요될듯 안돼는게 보기 조금 껄끄럽고, 2번이 3,4,5번이랑 겹치는 것도 그렇구요.

• Normal

1. 00:11:842 (2,3) - 슬라 방향이 커서 무빙 방향에서 많이 꺽여서 흐름이 조금 부서지는(?) 듯한 느낌이라 아쉽네요. 다른 비슷한 부분들 (00:05:879 (2,3) - 01:33:829 (2,3) - )은 그렇지 않은데
2. 00:41:096 (2,3,4) - 여기는 조금 꺽어 두면 더 보기 좋을수도 있겠네요 http://puu.sh/p3hSt/91fce7e901.jpg
3. 00:44:637 (4,1) - 담요 조금 삐뚤

• Hard

1. 00:43:519 (1,2) - 이 부분이 앞 부분 ( 00:42:401 (2,3,4,5) - ) 과 모양은 같은데 박자가 달라서 함정 같아요 ㅋㅋ
2. 01:18:736 (1,2,3) - blanket
3. 01:27:494 (3,4,5,6,1) - 01:39:419 (3,4,5,6,1) - 여긴 서클만 다섯개 연속에다 흐름도 하드에 넣기엔 좀 어려운것 같아요.
4. 01:30:102 (2,4) - 스넵 살짝 어긋났네요

• Insane

1. 00:30:102 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 여기 소리 좋은데 조금 더 살릴수 있지 않을까요
2. 00:40:537 (1,2) - 거리는 비슷한데 박자가 틀려서 치기 조금 어렵네요
3. 01:02:525 (2,1) - 1/2 비트 여유가 있는데 스텍하지 않는게 읽기 쉬울것 같아요
4. 01:24:885 (5,1) 두 노트 서로 닿을듯 말듯 한게 어색하게 보여요.
5. 01:24:885 (5,1,2) - 슬라 진행방향 -> 5-1번 노트 커서 방향 -> 1-2번 노트 커서 진행방향 모두 같은데, 커서 움직이는 속도는 달라서 치기 까다로울것 같습니다. 2번 노트를 일직선 말고 90도 정도 틀어서 배치해 주시면 플로우가 좋을듯 싶네요.
6. 01:29:357 (6,7,8,9,1) - 1번 노트만 살짝 왼쪽이네요.
7. 01:34:202 (1,2) - 이렇게 배치해 두시면 슬라 뒤에 2연타로 오해하기 쉬울것 같아요.

1. Remove Cube tag (useless)
2. Add tags: OP, 東タカゴー, eroge, east, takago
3. I can't really find metadata on title, except one nicovideo that says "(Short Ver.)" so maybe for now put it in parentheses?
   

1. 00:17:898 - Uselss green tick, move it to 00:17:991 -

BitterCoffee wrote:

넵 모딩입니다.

• Easy

1. 00:03:270 (3,4,1) - 00:09:233 (3,4,1) - 00:13:705 (1,2,3) - 01:25:258 (3,4,5) - 이런 일직선 모양( http://puu.sh/p3hue/d21e122a37.jpg )은 가능하면 피하는게 좋을것 같은데 너무 많은것 같아요. 이런 식 ( http://puu.sh/p3hxL/0d56b4770f.jpg ) 으로 조금 비뚤어 주면 어떨까요 경우에 따라 고칠건 고쳤습니다.
2. 01:09:978 (2,3) - 담요 조금 삐뚤fix
3. 01:19:295 (3,4,5,1,2) - 여기 모양이 조금 아쉽네요. 1번이 5번 담요될듯 안돼는게 보기 조금 껄끄럽고, 2번이 3,4,5번이랑 겹치는 것도 그렇구요.의도가 없었구, 시간차가 있어서 괜찮아보입니다.

• Normal

1. 00:11:842 (2,3) - 슬라 방향이 커서 무빙 방향에서 많이 꺽여서 흐름이 조금 부서지는(?) 듯한 느낌이라 아쉽네요. 다른 비슷한 부분들 (00:05:879 (2,3) - 01:33:829 (2,3) - )은 그렇지 않은데아이디어 생기면 고쳐볼게요!
2. 00:41:096 (2,3,4) - 여기는 조금 꺽어 두면 더 보기 좋을수도 있겠네요 http://puu.sh/p3hSt/91fce7e901.jpgfix
3. 00:44:637 (4,1) - 담요 조금 삐뚤fix

• Hard

1. 00:43:519 (1,2) - 이 부분이 앞 부분 ( 00:42:401 (2,3,4,5) - ) 과 모양은 같은데 박자가 달라서 함정 같아요 ㅋㅋ보컬매핑이라..
2. 01:18:736 (1,2,3) - blanketfix
3. 01:27:494 (3,4,5,6,1) - 01:39:419 (3,4,5,6,1) - 여긴 서클만 다섯개 연속에다 흐름도 하드에 넣기엔 좀 어려운것 같아요.제일 고조된다 생각한 파트라..
4. 01:30:102 (2,4) - 스넵 살짝 어긋났네요fix

• Insane

1. 00:30:102 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 여기 소리 좋은데 조금 더 살릴수 있지 않을까요패턴이라..고려해볼게요.
2. 00:40:537 (1,2) - 거리는 비슷한데 박자가 틀려서 치기 조금 어렵네요fix
3. 01:02:525 (2,1) - 1/2 비트 여유가 있는데 스텍하지 않는게 읽기 쉬울것 같아요fix
4. 01:24:885 (5,1) 두 노트 서로 닿을듯 말듯 한게 어색하게 보여요.fix
5. 01:24:885 (5,1,2) - 슬라 진행방향 -> 5-1번 노트 커서 방향 -> 1-2번 노트 커서 진행방향 모두 같은데, 커서 움직이는 속도는 달라서 치기 까다로울것 같습니다. 2번 노트를 일직선 말고 90도 정도 틀어서 배치해 주시면 플로우가 좋을듯 싶네요. 슬라를 뒤집어봤어요
6. 01:29:357 (6,7,8,9,1) - 1번 노트만 살짝 왼쪽이네요. fix
7. 01:34:202 (1,2) - 이렇게 배치해 두시면 슬라 뒤에 2연타로 오해하기 쉬울것 같아요.비슷한 패턴이 많아서 괜찮을거같아요.

맵이 좋네요. 랭킹 굳럭 :3

CookieBite wrote:

Hello there, from my modding queue.
*M4M

[Easy Jijou]
00:04:462 (4,1) - overlapintentional and not a problem
00:14:897 (2,3) - blanket improvefix
00:29:804 (2,3) - ^fix
00:31:667 (1,3) - do a blanket?can't..
01:29:804 (1) - it run out the playable area (i mean just put it down a bit cuz it's too high)not an offscrean..I'll consider it.
01:32:413 (4,1) - overlap^

[Normal Jijou]
00:44:711 (4,1) - blanket improvefix
00:51:046 (1,2) - run out the playable area^
01:16:015 (3,4) - blanket?fix
01:18:437 (2) - ctrl+jthat would be nice

[Hard Jijou]
00:41:170 (2,3) - swtich?fI'll consider flow first
00:57:568 (2,4) - overlapfix
01:03:903 (3,1) - stack them?fix

[Insane Jijou]
really not much problem here.

good luck with your map!

Remilia_CO wrote:

Hi! from my queue

Insane

1. 00:18:624 (2) - NC for SV changing
2. 00:33:158 (1) - feels squeezed too tight by these two 00:33:717 (2,3)
3. 00:36:139 (1) - same
4. Most of your first half of the map are on the right side, why don't put some patterns to the left?
5. 01:00:363 (3) - too close to the following stream compare with the DS to the previous note, looks odd.
   Good diff

Hard

1. 00:03:344 (1) - this position feels a bit odd, maybe move to 123,202?
2. 00:35:208 (2) - too close with 00:35:767 (4) - , may be move abit upward
3. 00:40:611 (1,2) - how about making the 1 tail at the same place with 00:41:543 (3) 's tail?
4. 00:51:978 - Make a note here? the vocal is really clear.
5. 01:28:313 (1,3) - move to 374,201?

Normal

1. 00:14:711 (2,3) - Hmmm this might be too hard for Normal
2. 00:13:779 (1,4) - why don't make these two symmetry?
3. 00:34:649 (1,2) - Didn't feel any necessity for using long sliders here.
   No big problems

EASY

1. 00:17:506 (2) - Eventhought it follows the DS, the flow makes it feels closer than reality, which might
   
   mislead new players. I suggest to move red point to 311,152 and move the slider tail to 283,212 to make a different
   
   direction flow with 00:18:624 (3)
2. 01:23:841 (1) - why don't make the slider head overlap with this' 01:20:860 (1) ?
3. 00:04:462 (4) - use this in Easy might cause you some problems.01:32:413 (4) - same

Good luck XD

Zero__wind wrote:

M4M from my queue

General
change your bg pics into .jpg format, it will make your file size a lot more smaller
I think the volume of your soft-hitwhistle.wav is currently too low which makes it hardly noticeable in the map, please turn its volume up a bit
hitsound suggestions work for other diffs as well
00:17:693 - 00:31:388 - and similar points in the later part, I don't think you need to turn down their volume so much, they are currently too soft to be heard. 20% lower than the main parts can be better

Easy Jijou
AR3 recommended, as the song is not a really slow one
00:17:506 (2) - a soft finish may sound nice at its end all will be fixed..these days I'm so tired because of university festival.
00:31:667 (1) - soft finish on head to emphasize the downbeat
00:41:916 (3) - ^
00:51:046 (1) - ^
01:02:972 (1) - ^
01:14:897 (1) - ^
01:25:332 (3) - ^
01:28:313 (1) - ^
01:07:444 (3,4,5,1) - this doesn't flow really good imo. maybe try something like thisfixed

Normal Jijou
use AR5 for this diff if you changed the AR for Easy to 3
00:59:990 (1,2) - this pattern feels a bit weird imo although it's following the distance snap, maybe remove the reverse of 1 and add a circle at 01:00:363 - at its left, and adjust the following notes accordingly?fixed
01:02:599 (1) - this NC may be unnecessary, considering you didn't have that NC in Hard diff, maybe remove it?fixed
01:11:170 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5) - this rhythm seems a bit too hard, I suggest to remove 01:13:220 (4) - as there's no drum beatfixed
01:40:984 (1,1) - I think these NC are not necessary, better remove them. same for Hard and Insane difffixed all

Hard Jijou
00:43:593 (1,2) - I think moving the NC to 2 may make this gap more readable, just like how 00:40:239 (4,1) - looksfixed
00:46:201 (3) - it feels really odd to suddenly stack the circle at a slider's end as you'ev never placed them like this before. I think it'd be better to simplly unstack 00:45:642 (2,3) - and use equal distance between 00:45:642 (2,3,4,1) - fixed
01:03:903 (3,1) - better stack them properlyfixed
01:09:680 (3,4) - I think the stack kinda breaks the flow, maybe move it out?fixed
01:07:816 (1) - I suggest to remove NC for consistencyfixed

Insane Jijou
00:36:139 (1,2) - they seem too close to each other, maybe move 2 down a little (00:36:139 (1,4) - are not so close)fixed
00:59:617 (5,3) - not really important, but you may want to stack themfixed
01:10:984 (3,4) - I don't really like to place objects so close in kiais, I think it will feel better to use some bigger spacings and spread the notes out in the kiai
generally plays finechanged shape

that's all for me
remember, you generally need to add tons of finish sounds for all of your diffs, check carefully!
good luck

Remilia_CO wrote:

Remilia_CO wrote:

Hi! from my queue

Insane

1. 00:18:624 (2) - NC for SV changingfixed
2. 00:33:158 (1) - feels squeezed too tight by these two 00:33:717 (2,3) fixed
3. 00:36:139 (1) - same^
4. Most of your first half of the map are on the right side, why don't put some patterns to the left?lol really I'll fix it.
5. 01:00:363 (3) - too close to the following stream compare with the DS to the previous note, looks odd.according to a sound.
   Good diff

Hard

1. 00:03:344 (1) - this position feels a bit odd, maybe move to 123,202?well
2. 00:35:208 (2) - too close with 00:35:767 (4) - , may be move abit upwardfixed
3. 00:40:611 (1,2) - how about making the 1 tail at the same place with 00:41:543 (3) 's tail?I don't like that flow in hard diff..
4. 00:51:978 - Make a note here? the vocal is really clear.well
5. 01:28:313 (1,3) - move to 374,201?I couldn't find why.

Normal

1. 00:14:711 (2,3) - Hmmm this might be too hard for Normalfixed
2. 00:13:779 (1,4) - why don't make these two symmetry?fixed
3. 00:34:649 (1,2) - Didn't feel any necessity for using long sliders here.I'm now considering it.
   No big problems

EASY

1. 00:17:506 (2) - Eventhought it follows the DS, the flow makes it feels closer than reality, which might I'll consider it.
   
   mislead new players. I suggest to move red point to 311,152 and move the slider tail to 283,212 to make a different
   
   direction flow with 00:18:624 (3)
2. 01:23:841 (1) - why don't make the slider head overlap with this' 01:20:860 (1) ?I have no intention to..
3. 00:04:462 (4) - use this in Easy might cause you some problems.01:32:413 (4) - samesome other ranked easy diffs have this kind of pattern

Good luck XD

snoopeh wrote:

hello
hard diff:
00:06:698 (2,2) - sliders seems like a better choicewell
00:07:816 (3) - just a circle instead of slider?I think sound more fits in slidder
01:29:431 (5,1) - this may be confusing for "hard" map playerI think it's not..

insane diff:
01:00:549 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - you can use a bit more space. ~0,5x using distance snapper.fixed
00:31:294 (7,8,9,1) - 'bit closer to the 00:31:108 (6) but not much lol i'll try it.

other than that, maps seems alright, mods have done great job!
sorry for the short mod. :c

Sotarks wrote:

Hi! M4M from my queue~.

Insane Jijou

1. 00:08:189 (2) - Tbh if you ctrl g this, it makes a nice flow between 00:07:816 (1,2) - and also a nice emphasis for that clap 00:08:562 (3) - here, and nice gameplay tho.That would be bad in DS.. I'll try if i can.
2. 00:37:630 (1) - Nazi but what about stacking it propely on 00:36:698 (2) - just for the aesthetics.
3. 00:46:760 (2,4) - Try to avoid those small overlaps, could be cool.
4. 01:24:959 (5) - Try to moove this one x18 y193, it will make a nice flow to catch 01:25:332 (1) - this.
5. 01:33:158 (2,4) - Moove those exactly x164 y187, makes a nice blanket structure, to follow consistency of your map.
6. 01:40:239 (1,2,3) - What about space them more? Could be a nice emphasis here!
   
   Really nice diff here, I really like that structure and flow you use here!

GL~
(Sorry for short mod, but I'm not so good modding low BPM's low diffs. So you can do short mod too for my map, it's fine.)

Left wrote:

@SnowNiNo_

https://osu.ppy.sh/s/457086
Then can I request this? Not my map but my second main project.

Battle wrote:

m4

[Easy]
00:06:326 (2,3) - You should probably alter the rhythm here, the more prominent beats end up being on the slider ends, and that doesn't really emphasize them well. Having the cymbal crashes clickable should be your main priority since they are strong than the slider startsused vocal sound
00:19:742 (1,2,3,4,1) - tbh this isn't too visually appealing, you might want to re-adjust the slider shapes a bit, cuz currently the way 1,2,3 look is kinda awkward, and 3,4,1 break flow quite a bit so it isn't as smooth as the diff has been so farprior keep, later fixed
00:19:742 (1,1) - Just wondering, why does 00:22:723 (1) - have a slider shape that gives some emphasis to the drum on 00:23:096 - w/ it's shape but 00:19:742 (1) - doesn't? Just wondering lolfixed
00:37:630 (1,3) - tbh you could rotate 3 so it looks more symmetrical w/ 1 to give an even cleaner look to it well..
00:41:916 (3,4) - tbh you could curve 3 more to match the aesthetics of 4fixed
01:11:543 (1) - I dunno, personally I would make the start of the new verse clickable, but the drum is also a significant beat, you may want to make this two single taps so you can emphasize drums and vocals at same timefixed
01:20:860 (1,2) - These are kinda awkward since the vocal held ends on 01:21:605 - and 01:23:096 - so you might want to shorten the sliders and put single taps on the white ticks to follow music betterfixed
01:34:276 (2,3) - Same thing w/ the cymbals, it's not too huge of an issue, but the cymbals are pretty strong compared to the adjacent notesfixed
01:38:748 (1,2) - You should have 2 flow, and then readjust whatever pattern you want, cuz like even tho the semi-break in flow emphasizes the cymbal, it doesn't look too visually appealingfixed

Really good aestheticthx

[Normal]
00:04:835 (1,2,3) - You should try to have the flow break on 3 rather than 2, it emphasizes the right beats that wayfixed
00:34:649 (1,2) - While the slider art looks nice, it isn't really structured since the rhythm similar to this 00:22:723 (1,2,3,4) - has the rhythm clicked and everything, so it heavily strays from the structurefixed
00:51:046 (1,2,3,4) - I personally really prefer the rhythm below since it feels like it follows the most while maintaining it's simplicity fixed similarly

.

00:59:990 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - You may want to spread this out a little more so it's a LOT easier for low ranks to read fixed

. x2

01:11:170 (5) - Personally pointing 5 upwards helps aesthetic a bit but that's just my opinionfixed
01:35:021 (4) - You could raise this a bit higher to have perfect flow from 3, overlapping w/ the hp is kinda gross but it's not unrankable since the hp bar is an optional thingI'll consider it

[Hard]
00:06:139 (4,1) - You may want to tone down this jump just a little bit, 2.3 is quite a large distance. You can maintain your 1.6x DS jumps that you did for
whenever you needed to emphasize downbeat fixed
00:17:878 (4,5) - You may want to emphasize 5, pretty strong beatfixed
01:02:599 (5,1) - You should have a jump here, the intensity building up to the kiai deserves more emphasis imofixed

[Insane]
00:07:444 (3,1) - The extended slider may not be so clear in this case with how far away from the 3/4 slider it is compared to 00:06:698 (3,1) - I have no Idea to fix.. I should think about it.
00:53:655 (8,1) - Maybe stack these?fixed
00:53:841 (9) - You should move this up a bit so it doesn't get obscured by the hitbursts from 00:53:096 (4,5,6) - just stacked
01:02:599 (2,1) - Kinda weird, cuz the way you have it makes it look like 2 ends on a blue tick and is immediately followed by 1, but that is not the case. You may want to either reposition 1 a bit or naje 2 end on the blue tick fixed

Really solid maplol thanks

Hobbes2 wrote:

Super sorry about this being so late

Mod from queue ~

[ez]

00:04:835 (1) - Consider reshaping so this doesnt overlapno problem
01:26:450 (4) - NC fixed


[norm]

00:23:468 (2) - Move this to 00:23:282 and reposition accordingly. After that, move 00:24:214 (3) - to 00:24:027, and lengthen it so it ends where it did before.fixed


otherwise very solid normal.

[hard]

00:49:369 (1,2) - this jump seems a bit tough for a hard, hm? Could be fine, might be worth considering.I don't think it's so hard..
01:10:611 (2,3) - if you angle these up a bit more it flows much betterI'll consider it.
01:15:829 (3,4,4) - stack? looks much better

Also good difficulty

[Insane]

00:51:791 (3,2) I'd move this so its directly on top of 00:52:723 (2) I don't feel like to..
00:52:350 (4,4,5,6) - stack these 4 properly, looks a bit off as it is now fixed

Also good difficulty.


Ugh, dinky mod. You don't need to kds if you don't think I helped :<

Sorry for small mod but I hope what I do have helped. Good luck!

MrSergio wrote:

General

• See if you can convert your .png BGs into .jpg, since they are 7MB by themselves right now. fixed
  
  You should check this with some qualified QAT/BN, but imo the "Short Ver." of your title should be between brackets : Duca - 1/5 (Short Ver.)
  I suggest this because that part isn't part of the original title, right?fixed
  

________________

Insane Jijou

• 00:32:040 (2,5) - Be careful, these sliders completely overlap one on each other. I would suggest to move the second one a bit to let the player see it in time.fixed
  Same for 00:20:114 (2,5)fixed
  
  00:33:717 (2,3,4) - So far you created more polished patterns compared to this one imo.fixed Just a suggestion
  
  00:40:611 (1,2,3,4) - This pattern is also a bit confusing:
  firstly, the jump between 00:40:984 (2,3) - is uncalled at all seeing the spacing between 1 and 2;
  secondly, 00:41:543 (4) - I would sughgest to convert this into circles, because you skip a really important beat at 00:41:729 - fixed
  
  00:49:369 (4) - why not stacking this circle on top of 00:49:555 (1) - ? It looks like the same rhythm as 00:48:065 (1,2) - imo fixed
  
  00:48:065 (1,2) - Ctrl + G to keep the circular flow between 00:49:555 (1,2,3,4) - ?
  
  01:07:444 (1,2,1) - having so many NCs close to each other is strange, seeing you don't use them so much in general.
  Imo you could even remove the NC from 01:07:816 (1) - since it adds nothing particular (you also don't have SV changes on those 3 sliders, so there is no need for a NC imo) fixed
  
  01:08:934 (1,4) - This is a bit counter-flow-wise seeing that 1 is the opposite direction of 4. Still fine tho, I would have kept the circular flow here too.
  On a second thought, leave those sliders as they are and do a Ctrl + G on 01:10:425 (1) - maybe, to resemble your other patterns there's enough time interval and two stacked circles, so i think it's okay
  
  01:21:978 (5,1) - Is there any way to increase spacing here? Seems a bit too clustered ccompared to the rest (suggestion: place 1 at 299;274) fixed
  
  01:26:450 (8,1) - First time seeing such a big 1/4 jump. You used them before but they were a lot shorter than this one.
  Maybe a Ctrl + G on 01:26:822 (1,2) - ?fixed
  

I would reduce OD to something like 7.5 since the diff itself isn't really hard and your Hard diff has OD6, so the difference is a bit too much imo.
Really good flow overall.

________________

Hard Jijou

• 00:17:506 (3,4) - Just a really personal suggestion: convert them into a 1/2 repeat slider if you find it coolfixed
  
  00:21:791 (2,4) - having both of them in the same direction makes it feel "forced" , since you were creating a nice circular flow with 00:21:232 (1,2) -
  See if you can fix them in some way (I would just do a Ctrl + G on 00:22:350 (4) - but see yourself what you like) mine felt better in my opinion.
  
  00:31:667 (1) - Finish on head maybe?fixed
  00:41:916 (1) - samefixed
  (maybe you have to add them on the Insane diff too. I didn't check, sorry)fixed
  

________________

Normal Jijou

• 00:18:624 (2,3) - I feel like the finsh on 2 is too much, while you should add your custom whistle on 3fixed
  

________________

Easy Jijou

• 00:18:624 (3) - same as for the Normal diff: remove finish from head, add whistle on repeatfixed
  
  01:02:972 (1) - finish should be on the head of this slider, not the tail imofixed
  
  01:11:543 (4) - missing clap?fixed
  
  01:14:897 (1) - remove finish from tailfixed
  

1. The map is structured quite well, great looking patterns that play not bad at all, although there are stuff that I personally don't find fitting -
2. 00:20:114 (2,5) - This full overlap is just confusing, as the previous patterns had a circle on the head, you used a slider here, it's unexpected and unnecessary as the music doesn't really support that one really well.
3. 00:32:040 (2,5) - ^
4. 00:27:195 (1) - Feels kinda out of place, not as elegant as the other sliders such as 00:36:139 (1) - 00:24:214 (1) - in a way that goes well with the previous moment too.
5. 01:01:667 (2,1) - I'd say it's pretty awful to stack those, the halt with the music is great, but if you are going to slow down the slider that much it's misleading, as I thought it'd gain a speed boost or at the very least be in the same speed as the previous slider, just like 01:28:313 (1,2,3) -. If you want it to work with the current velocity, I'd move 01:01:853 (1) - to around x356 y304 as it slows down the movement from the jump and plays really well.
6. 01:07:816 (1,2,3) - If you create so much emphasis on it, you could increase the SV a bit (1.2x) and even increase the spacing a little more, as the hitsounds overdo it compared to how it actually plays.
7. 01:21:605 (3,4) - You're not overlapping 01:20:673 (5) - but you do overlap 01:20:860 (1) - which comes afterwards? egh.. It looks a bit ugly anyway
8. 01:26:450 (8,1) - I'd say spacing is a bit big for such diff?
9. 01:34:649 (3,3) - Those are not symmetrical on the grid as the first slider overlaps with 01:35:021 (1,2) - while the second does not.

Avishay wrote:

Hey, sorry for the long wait, life happens.

[Insane]

1. The map is structured quite well, great looking patterns that play not bad at all, although there are stuff that I personally don't find fitting -
2. 00:20:114 (2,5) - This full overlap is just confusing, as the previous patterns had a circle on the head, you used a slider here, it's unexpected and unnecessary as the music doesn't really support that one really well.fixed some, but I'll use this pattern.
3. 00:32:040 (2,5) - ^^
4. 00:27:195 (1) - Feels kinda out of place, not as elegant as the other sliders such as 00:36:139 (1) - 00:24:214 (1) - in a way that goes well with the previous moment too.fixed
5. 01:01:667 (2,1) - I'd say it's pretty awful to stack those, the halt with the music is great, but if you are going to slow down the slider that much it's misleading, as I thought it'd gain a speed boost or at the very least be in the same speed as the previous slider, just like 01:28:313 (1,2,3) -. If you want it to work with the current velocity, I'd move 01:01:853 (1) - to around x356 y304 as it slows down the movement from the jump and plays really well.fixed
6. 01:07:816 (1,2,3) - If you create so much emphasis on it, you could increase the SV a bit (1.2x) and even increase the spacing a little more, as the hitsounds overdo it compared to how it actually plays.fixed
7. 01:21:605 (3,4) - You're not overlapping 01:20:673 (5) - but you do overlap 01:20:860 (1) - which comes afterwards? egh.. It looks a bit ugly anyway fixed
8. 01:26:450 (8,1) - I'd say spacing is a bit big for such diff?fixed
9. 01:34:649 (3,3) - Those are not symmetrical on the grid as the first slider overlaps with 01:35:021 (1,2) - while the second does not.???

Glz.

[Colours]
Combo1 : 245,158,193
Combo2 : 245,200,137
Combo3 : 115,181,247
Combo4 : 135,228,151

1. 00:12:661 (3,1) - Please move these a bit away from each other, they touch a little bit which makes it seem strange.
2. 00:13:406 (3) - Also move this so it's symmetrical.
3. 01:10:984 (3,4) - Not perfectly stacked, looks strange ingame.
4. 01:35:767 (1) - Missing hitsounds.
5. 01:40:239 (1,2) - These sounds are long sounds, maybe put slow sliders instead of just circles?

1. 00:02:226 (2,3) - BLANKETTTTTTT :3
2. 01:35:767 (1) - Missing hitsounds.

1. nothing here.

1. 01:38:748 (1,2) - Switch NC locations for set consistency?

Priti wrote:

bake my butt daddy
http://www.game-ost.com/static/covers_s ... 753864.jpg Disc Image for metadata reference.

Artist: Get someone else to confirm it, I'm not 100% sureI'll ask to BN about it.
Title: [1/5] ショート ver.fixed
Romanisation: [1/5] Short ver.fixed

Also, are you sure about current colors? they don't go well with each other.. try this;fixed

[Colours]
Combo1 : 245,158,193
Combo2 : 245,200,137
Combo3 : 115,181,247
Combo4 : 135,228,151

Insane

1. 00:12:661 (3,1) - Please move these a bit away from each other, they touch a little bit which makes it seem strange.fixed
2. 00:13:406 (3) - Also move this so it's symmetrical. fixed
3. 01:10:984 (3,4) - Not perfectly stacked, looks strange ingame.fixed
4. 01:35:767 (1) - Missing hitsounds. fixed
5. 01:40:239 (1,2) - These sounds are long sounds, maybe put slow sliders instead of just circles?it's last part of the song, so I want to make an impact on each beat by circles.

Hard

1. 00:02:226 (2,3) - BLANKETTTTTTT :3I didn't have intention but fixed
2. 01:35:767 (1) - Missing hitsounds.fixed, and Normal and Easy 2

Normal

1. nothing here.

Easy

1. 01:38:748 (1,2) - Switch NC locations for set consistency?fixed

Short mod because the map is super solid and there isn't much to say about it.

thanks for super super fast mod!

Ni-Sokkususu wrote:

아아아아아아아아아아앙