Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Other
  3. Off-Topic
  4. Surveys

What is your reaction time?

posted
Total Posts
41
Farfocele
1,038 posts
Joined April 2020
Topic Starter
Farfocele
Last thread related to that is dead, so I'm making a new thread for that.

Use Human Benchmark to test your reaction speed by doing 5 clicks when the red box turns green. The scores will be posted on a leaderboard to see who has the fastest reaction speed out of all osu! players (who use Surveys.)

Reaction Time Leaderboards (lower ms is better)
1. Naiad - 122ms (30/08/2024)
2. Farfocele - 152ms (29/08/2024)
3. Behrauder - 171ms (29/08/2024)
4. Corne2Plum3 - 178ms (29/08/2024)
4. Patitatta - 178ms (actually has a 129ms but they do not want that submitted for some reason) (30/08/2024)
5. Achromalia - 182ms (30/08/2024)
6. abraker - 186ms (30/08/2024)
7. Wimpy Cursed - 188ms (30/08/2024)
8. Reyalp51 - 214ms (29/08/2024)
9. gibby10 - 235ms (30/08/2024)
10. lostsilver - 269ms (30/08/2024)
11. Jangsoodlor - 287ms (29/08/2024)
My Reaction Time

First test i did while making this thread.

The test i did right after making this thread.

Man, the time did make a big difference...
Updates
V1.1 - Added links with proof of test completion to leaderboard placements. (29.08.2024 at 6:22 AM
V1.0 - Created this thread. (29.08.2024 at 6:15 AM)

Times are in UTC.
Last edited by Farfocele , edited 13 times in total.
Achromalia
338 posts
Joined November 2016
Achromalia
fastest five-click session would be

~200ms (29/08/2024)

during the fourth session (~219ms), the fastest single-click moment had been

~186ms (29/08/2024)
Farfocele
1,038 posts
Joined April 2020
Topic Starter
Farfocele

Achromalia wrote:

fastest five-click session would be

~200ms (29/08/2024)

during the fourth session (~219ms), the fastest single-click moment had been

~186ms (29/08/2024)
thanks, submitted!
Last edited by Farfocele , edited 1 time in total.
lostsilver
3,622 posts
Joined November 2022
lostsilver
i got 400 something first, then this was the final score
Farfocele
1,038 posts
Joined April 2020
Topic Starter
Farfocele

lostsilver wrote:

i got 400 something first, then this was the final score
damn, holy shit
Last edited by Farfocele , edited 1 time in total.
lostsilver
3,622 posts
Joined November 2022
lostsilver

Farfocele wrote:

lostsilver wrote:

i got 400 something first, then this was the final score
damn, holy shit
yeah,, i guess its decent seeing as achro got 100 something? it's not a competition tho ^^
Farfocele
1,038 posts
Joined April 2020
Topic Starter
Farfocele

lostsilver wrote:

Farfocele wrote:

lostsilver wrote:

i got 400 something first, then this was the final score
damn, holy shit
yeah,, i guess its decent seeing as achro got 100 something? it's not a competition tho ^^
i think the average is like 280ms iirc, but you should not feel bad about your score, it does not matter that much a lot of the time.
lostsilver
3,622 posts
Joined November 2022
lostsilver

Farfocele wrote:

lostsilver wrote:

Farfocele wrote:

lostsilver wrote:

i got 400 something first, then this was the final score
damn, holy shit
yeah,, i guess its decent seeing as achro got 100 something? it's not a competition tho ^^
i think the average is like 280ms iirc, but you should not feel bad about your score, it does not matter that much a lot of the time.
ohh, ok! i dont feel bad abt my score, im actually pretty happy with it ^^
Corne2Plum3
Global Moderator
1,762 posts
Joined November 2019
Corne2Plum3
192 ms
Jangsoodlor
Jangsoodlor
I'm slow
Farfocele
1,038 posts
Joined April 2020
Topic Starter
Farfocele

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

192 ms
Got a pic or other proof?

Jangsoodlor wrote:

I'm slow
score submitted!
Behrauder
94 posts
Joined June 2021
Behrauder


Last edited by Behrauder , edited 1 time in total.
Farfocele
1,038 posts
Joined April 2020
Topic Starter
Farfocele


First was 135ms... wtf?

Behrauder wrote:



Submitted both scores!
Last edited by Farfocele , edited 1 time in total.
Reyalp51
956 posts
Joined April 2021
Reyalp51
Corne2Plum3
Global Moderator
1,762 posts
Joined November 2019
Corne2Plum3

Farfocele wrote:

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

192 ms
Got a pic or other proof?
Forgot to take a screenshot, but later I did this:

Farfocele
1,038 posts
Joined April 2020
Topic Starter
Farfocele

Reyalp51 wrote:

Click to keep going. Not submitted.


Corne2Plum3 wrote:

Farfocele wrote:

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

192 ms
Got a pic or other proof?
Forgot to take a screenshot, but later I did this:

Submitted!
Reyalp51
956 posts
Joined April 2021
Reyalp51
im stupid lol

Naiad
594 posts
Joined May 2019
Naiad


It's kinda cap bcz I only submit my best runs but I average ~150
Last edited by Naiad , edited 1 time in total.
abraker
Global Moderator
8,327 posts
Joined July 2014
abraker
lostsilver
3,622 posts
Joined November 2022
lostsilver
hmm,,, i wanna try again, just wanna see if anything changes

edit:





Last edited by lostsilver , edited 1 time in total.
Wimpy Cursed
1,105 posts
Joined July 2021
Wimpy Cursed
Naiad
594 posts
Joined May 2019
Naiad

Naiad wrote:



It's kinda cap bcz I only submit my best runs but I average ~150


This appears to be my fastest ever run for the purpose of the leaderboard (((this is what happens after you spam 9* AR 10.7 maps for an hour)))
Last edited by Naiad , edited 1 time in total.
Farfocele
1,038 posts
Joined April 2020
Topic Starter
Farfocele
On PC now, i'll submit all scores.
Achromalia
338 posts
Joined November 2016
Achromalia
update!! im not sure how it happened o.o

~182ms (30/08/2024)

that will probably remain my fastest score for a long time bc i normally am averaging between ~210 and ~220 in the scores i dont save, and i dont really feel like my reflexes are very sharp at all

also accidentally got this score, a joke submission really

single-click "~8ms" accident
Farfocele
1,038 posts
Joined April 2020
Topic Starter
Farfocele

Achromalia wrote:

update!! im not sure how it happened o.o

~182ms (30/08/2024)

that will probably remain my fastest score for a long time bc i normally am averaging between ~210 and ~220 in the scores i dont save, and i dont really feel like my reflexes are very sharp at all

also accidentally got this score, a joke submission really

single-click "~8ms" accident
Submitted!
Patatitta
1,237 posts
Joined February 2020
Patatitta
1- this hz based


2- you can theoretically get a super low reaction time if you just RNG it

like I just did, you can get way lower



this is my legit time

DeletedUser_14357613
DeletedUser_14357613

lostsilver wrote:

hmm,,, i wanna try again, just wanna see if anything changes

edit:





hi can i talk to you? also

Farfocele
1,038 posts
Joined April 2020
Topic Starter
Farfocele

Patatitta wrote:

1- this hz based


2- you can theoretically get a super low reaction time if you just RNG it

like I just did, you can get way lower



this is my legit time

I have no idea how you fully "RNG"ed the test (did you get like a 10ms RNG segment?), but upon request i will submit the lower time
Farfocele
1,038 posts
Joined April 2020
Topic Starter
Farfocele

gibby10 wrote:

lostsilver wrote:

hmm,,, i wanna try again, just wanna see if anything changes

edit:





hi can i talk to you? also

Submitted! (i had to reply to this to find the imgur link...)
Last edited by Farfocele , edited 1 time in total.
Patatitta
1,237 posts
Joined February 2020
Patatitta

Farfocele wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

1- this hz based


2- you can theoretically get a super low reaction time if you just RNG it

like I just did, you can get way lower



this is my legit time

I have no idea how you fully "RNG"ed the test (did you get like a 10ms RNG segment?), but upon request i will submit the lower time
I clicked go, waited 4 seconds, clicked, I got like one 10ms segment, two around 60-80, and then 2 where I overstayed, green popped up, wasn't ready and did slow

edit: tried again with that method and got a 126, I had all low times except one really long 226, it's just luck
Last edited by Patatitta , edited 2 times in total.
Farfocele
1,038 posts
Joined April 2020
Topic Starter
Farfocele

Patatitta wrote:

Farfocele wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

1- this hz based


2- you can theoretically get a super low reaction time if you just RNG it

like I just did, you can get way lower



this is my legit time

I have no idea how you fully "RNG"ed the test (did you get like a 10ms RNG segment?), but upon request i will submit the lower time
I clicked go, waited 4 seconds, clicked, I got like one 10ms segment, two around 60-80, and then 2 where I overstayed, green popped up, wasn't ready and did slow

edit: tried again with that method and got a 126, I had all low times except one really long 226, it's just luck
damn, that's crazy and will need to try that
npc_BeaniCraft
451 posts
Joined October 2021
npc_BeaniCraft
1st time: 258ms
2nd time: 264ms
3rd time: 251ms
4th time: 232ms
5th time: 235ms
lostsilver
3,622 posts
Joined November 2022
lostsilver

npc_BeaniCraft wrote:

1st time: 258ms
2nd time: 264ms
3rd time: 251ms
4th time: 232ms
5th time: 235ms
wow you did it 5 times??
Farfocele
1,038 posts
Joined April 2020
Topic Starter
Farfocele

npc_BeaniCraft wrote:

1st time: 258ms
2nd time: 264ms
3rd time: 251ms
4th time: 232ms
5th time: 235ms
That's not quite what i meant by doing 5 clicks... Will submit tomorrow though.
npc_BeaniCraft
451 posts
Joined October 2021
npc_BeaniCraft

Farfocele wrote:

npc_BeaniCraft wrote:

1st time: 258ms
2nd time: 264ms
3rd time: 251ms
4th time: 232ms
5th time: 235ms
That's not quite what i meant by doing 5 clicks... Will submit tomorrow though.
i knew what you meant! it's just that i wanted to do it multiple times to get a average!
Farfocele
1,038 posts
Joined April 2020
Topic Starter
Farfocele

npc_BeaniCraft wrote:

Farfocele wrote:

npc_BeaniCraft wrote:

1st time: 258ms
2nd time: 264ms
3rd time: 251ms
4th time: 232ms
5th time: 235ms
That's not quite what i meant by doing 5 clicks... Will submit tomorrow though.
i knew what you meant! it's just that i wanted to do it multiple times to get a average!
oh, sick
Karmine
889 posts
Joined November 2015
Karmine
2 days.
great_elmo
116 posts
Joined March 2024
great_elmo
Don't think I did too bad

DJruslan4ic
5 posts
Joined February 2023
DJruslan4ic
Around 200ms
DJruslan4ic
5 posts
Joined February 2023
DJruslan4ic
I tested in my computer classroom, maybe I'll post a screenshot later
SlowDumbLoser
13 posts
Joined October 2014
SlowDumbLoser
Enough to make a statue look fast
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 41