I don't understand how the second image looks like the first one. The first one has a lot of details that wouldn't be practical to animate, so it's more common in fanarts than in animations. The second one looks more like anime because it's simpler, and... I don't know, it just feels more similar to real anime, I think.Kobold84 wrote:
What do you mean by "feel fanart"? All the images in your example (apart from the last one) have pretty much the same composition and style, it's hard to shake off the feeling of deja vu. The manga part is however rather impressive but not in terms of style and detail, it's good because it's not static — it actually does more than a simple pose, which is one of the things good anime models struggle with.Behrauder wrote:
For me, it's the only model that can generate anime images that don’t feel like fanart. Like, I think the first image looks like fanart, but the second one feels more like actual anime.Kobold84 wrote:
Images work for me.
This new model is generally impressive, but alas its anime capabilities are lacking. All images look even more generic and not only in style, in composition as well. Perhaps it's for the best.
Maybe I just don't know many image generators, but I think the only ones capable of something similar are those that need LoRA or something like that, but I've never seen a real example that doesn't feel like fanart, so Idk.
Cool image (unless you pay attention to the details, since there are many errors...)
This model is the first one that can put anime characters in real life!:
