why don’t we just wait for abraker to stop being dead and ask him to merge the rejected list
show more
I dont understand why are there people in the government who sees OT! as a shitland, call the title which many has work on shit and still disrespecting whoever dont want the denizen to be called shit. How thats hard to understand
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
just because its off topic doesnt mean you guys can be profane. there are less indecent ways to say the way your feel.
I just dont think its worth trying to go against this stuff. Everytime I try and voice my opinion about anything in this game I am thrown 10 feet under or I am shafted.
I wasn't expected to be even brought onto parliament, and I guess I was elected at the slow point of it all.
If there are genuine issues you want to try and talk through, im always open in DM
can we discuss a solution?
it's better this place gets ruined
😠😠😠
No.
Each page consist 50 post so you have 2 whole pages. As the current requirement of denizen you need 10pages of post to complete the post requirement
Exemple:
me too, please
welcome back bud
It was changed to have a system that is more clear, easier to understand, that creates less drama, and so far, this thread has achieved it's goal.
how is it that the "current drama" is necessarily about you not being abraker?
(and does it not seem plausible that there were things abraker did that people happen to prefer? i can't really point to those distinctions myself, so i don't really have an argument to make in posing this follow-up question, but i also think it might be fair to consider this if it's not something that can be explained)
Me not being abraker is not the reason, however it kinda illustrates the point I want to make, if you were to look at the original denizen thread in a more objective way, you would see the system we used to have failed at it, if the point was to preserve OT history, it was too confusing to understand and each gen lacked the context for a new user to come in OT and understand it, the gen changes were mainly defined by OT lore, which you will have noticed it's currently very absent from current OT, so abraker just started changing the gens when it just felt right, which led to many problems, since at that point in time abraker wasn't really active in OT and was pretty out of touch with many things, however, abraker ruling kept being king because well, he was abraker, the person with the most authority in OT.
the system just didn't work, and the people running the thread just started freeballing it, the requirements were not enforced, people who met the 8 month activity requirement and had created many posts and threads didn't get denizen while someone like blushing, who didn't meet the requirements, got it, and instead of just reversing the changes, a vote was held to decide if the very obvious rule breakin should be reversed, no vote for blushing to get in but one for him to get out, the system was biased as fuck.
But well, most people in OT never really challenged the system, for most people the denizen thread existed even from before they joined OT or osu and would probably still exist for the day they quit, everyone just was used to it. + you, as a newfag, even if you saw flaws with the system, you didn't have the authority to criticize it.
Then I come in and actually change the system, changing the thing everyone is used to basing myself on the problems people had learn to ignore, not only that, but I wasn't abraker, if abraker wanted to change something in OT, they could just do it, no question asked, I don't have that level of power. It's natural for people to be really mad at me, however, I truly think that i'm in the right with the changes I have made, so I don't really care
also, the people actually criticizing me are like the same 3 people every time, the wider OT community doesn't really seem to care, is that because denizen has lost all prestige?, maybe, I do personally think some people do care enough to check this thread and don't really see anything wrong with it, people still react at the announcements and shit
(the unstated message: "posting about how weird it might be that someone cares or doesn't care about a certain thing is not very useful, probably. if you want to know, ask why. if you don't, idk i guess you're free to be boring if you don't want to leave it alone")
((that being said, i don't actually expect that or want to impose any of that, i'm just satisfying my own need to be correct~))
*to gmts, silence.
as for the forum now, i really enjoy ot as it is. it's not as fun as it was during my age of roleplay, but i don't really need thrills to be content with the community here
though i won't exactly mind if someone comes out with a neat idea that everyone can play a part in~ but it really depends on who cares and whether an event even needs someone to care in order to be effective ot lore
anyway, go fix your life! savor something meaningful to you, find out what you can do for yourself and others ^^
If the requirements were as high as you've claimed the denizens Emjakolic, MaxIsABigKaiju, Kori and BeaniCraft would not be denizens in the first place, unless you know something about them that I don't.
Otherwise I assume the requirement increase you must be referring to post count and time spent on the forum, which isn't really difficult.
Granted I don't know where to find these new requirements so I don't really know what's going on. No, I have not actively looked for it, so I'm aware that's a fault on my part.
When there were events it would have been people who organised them but now OT is less big things and more small things so most people don't do anything significant aside from just being here, which imo is enough to be considered a part of the community.
show more
Why don't we just go back to when the Parliament wasn't bungee jumping on the presidents dick!
You are wrong here, im the one thats peggin himYmir wrote:
Why don't we just go back to when the Parliament wasn't bungee jumping on the presidents dick!
Not in MY headcanon.Reyalp51 wrote:
You are wrong here, im the one thats peggin himYmir wrote:
Why don't we just go back to when the Parliament wasn't bungee jumping on the presidents dick!
You call the denizen a "Hall of shame". The title which many sees as people who contributed to OT! and now you are saying why are they mad.Karmine wrote:
That's literally what you're doing.Manishh wrote:
yeah but some want to make it better while calling it a shit.roufou wrote:
I think the denizen system is ok for historical purposes to remember people who have been active on OT. I don't really care about making it a bigger deal than that.
I dont understand why are there people in the government who sees OT! as a shitland, call the title which many has work on shit and still disrespecting whoever dont want the denizen to be called shit. How thats hard to understand
if you think the title is wrong then make a report about it. otherwise you are really the only person complaining about it.Manishh wrote:
You call the denizen a "Hall of shame". The title which many sees as people who contributed to OT! and now you are saying why are they mad.Karmine wrote:
That's literally what you're doing.Manishh wrote:
yeah but some want to make it better while calling it a shit.roufou wrote:
I think the denizen system is ok for historical purposes to remember people who have been active on OT. I don't really care about making it a bigger deal than that.
I dont understand why are there people in the government who sees OT! as a shitland, call the title which many has work on shit and still disrespecting whoever dont want the denizen to be called shit. How thats hard to understand
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
just because its off topic doesnt mean you guys can be profane. there are less indecent ways to say the way your feel.
I just dont think its worth trying to go against this stuff. Everytime I try and voice my opinion about anything in this game I am thrown 10 feet under or I am shafted.
I wasn't expected to be even brought onto parliament, and I guess I was elected at the slow point of it all.
If there are genuine issues you want to try and talk through, im always open in DM
finally somebody said what I was thinkingBlushing wrote:
if you think the title is wrong then make a report about it. otherwise you are really the only person complaining about it.Manishh wrote:
You call the denizen a "Hall of shame". The title which many sees as people who contributed to OT! and now you are saying why are they mad.Karmine wrote:
That's literally what you're doing.Manishh wrote:
yeah but some want to make it better while calling it a shit.roufou wrote:
I think the denizen system is ok for historical purposes to remember people who have been active on OT. I don't really care about making it a bigger deal than that.
I dont understand why are there people in the government who sees OT! as a shitland, call the title which many has work on shit and still disrespecting whoever dont want the denizen to be called shit. How thats hard to understand
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
just because its off topic doesnt mean you guys can be profane. there are less indecent ways to say the way your feel.
I just dont think its worth trying to go against this stuff. Everytime I try and voice my opinion about anything in this game I am thrown 10 feet under or I am shafted.
I wasn't expected to be even brought onto parliament, and I guess I was elected at the slow point of it all.
If there are genuine issues you want to try and talk through, im always open in DM
what are genuine issues
anything you want to bring up or talk about. any and all issues. the idea of parliament is supposed to be a way for you or other people to bring up issues and we can discuss a solution.Manishh wrote:
what are genuine issues
i want to be a memorable figure in this site and it feels like i am not rewarded despite of all the efforts that i've madeBlushing wrote:
anything you want to bring up or talk about. any and all issues. the idea of parliament is supposed to be a way for you or other people to bring up issues and we can discuss a solution.Manishh wrote:
what are genuine issues
can we discuss a solution?
the solution we could discuss is a feeling of self-fulfillment rather than an arbitrary "title" that "matters" in only 1 subforum.Scyla wrote:
i want to be a memorable figure in this site and it feels like i am not rewarded despite of all the efforts that i've madeBlushing wrote:
anything you want to bring up or talk about. any and all issues. the idea of parliament is supposed to be a way for you or other people to bring up issues and we can discuss a solution.Manishh wrote:
what are genuine issues
can we discuss a solution?
but that title is the only thing that can fulfill me, i only have ot, without ot i am nothing, ot is my everythingBlushing wrote:
the solution we could discuss is a feeling of self-fulfillment rather than an arbitrary "title" that "matters" in only 1 subforum.Scyla wrote:
i want to be a memorable figure in this site and it feels like i am not rewarded despite of all the efforts that i've madeBlushing wrote:
anything you want to bring up or talk about. any and all issues. the idea of parliament is supposed to be a way for you or other people to bring up issues and we can discuss a solution.Manishh wrote:
what are genuine issues
can we discuss a solution?
there is another thing that can fill youScyla wrote:
but that title is the only thing that can fulfill me, i only have ot, without ot i am nothing, ot is my everythingBlushing wrote:
the solution we could discuss is a feeling of self-fulfillment rather than an arbitrary "title" that "matters" in only 1 subforum.Scyla wrote:
i want to be a memorable figure in this site and it feels like i am not rewarded despite of all the efforts that i've madeBlushing wrote:
anything you want to bring up or talk about. any and all issues. the idea of parliament is supposed to be a way for you or other people to bring up issues and we can discuss a solution.Manishh wrote:
what are genuine issues
can we discuss a solution?
the few really ruin the subforum for the many
if things doesn't go as i plan or i wantBlushing wrote:
the few really ruin the subforum for the many
it's better this place gets ruined
😠😠😠
🎶 shut the fuck up 🎶Scyla wrote:
if things doesn't go as i plan or i wantBlushing wrote:
the few really ruin the subforum for the many
it's better this place gets ruined
😠😠😠
guys I think I ate a parasite that was on my salmon
Go drink cow piss and say skibidi 100 times, this will fix youPolyspora wrote:
guys I think I ate a parasite that was on my salmon
I'm not drinking cow piss tf I'm not indian broManishh wrote:
Go drink cow piss and say skibidi 100 times, this will fix youPolyspora wrote:
guys I think I ate a parasite that was on my salmon
cow piss good for your bodyPolyspora wrote:
I'm not drinking cow piss tf I'm not indian broManishh wrote:
Go drink cow piss and say skibidi 100 times, this will fix youPolyspora wrote:
guys I think I ate a parasite that was on my salmon
then delete the systemPatatitta wrote:
I agree with karmine and blushing
B0ii wrote:
🎶 shut the fuck up 🎶Scyla wrote:
if things doesn't go as i plan or i wantBlushing wrote:
the few really ruin the subforum for the many
it's better this place gets ruined
😠😠😠
we can’t just put everyone into one category that wouldn’t really be helpfulReyalp51 wrote:
i suggested the name cock enjoyers
🎶 please fuck off 🎶Scyla wrote:
B0ii wrote:
🎶 shut the fuck up 🎶Scyla wrote:
if things doesn't go as i plan or i wantBlushing wrote:
the few really ruin the subforum for the many
it's better this place gets ruined
😠😠😠
🎶 Please stop insulting each other 🎶B0ii wrote:
🎶 please fuck off 🎶Scyla wrote:
B0ii wrote:
🎶 shut the fuck up 🎶Scyla wrote:
if things doesn't go as i plan or i wantBlushing wrote:
the few really ruin the subforum for the many
it's better this place gets ruined
😠😠😠
A rather irrelevant userhis everything wrote:
Am I the only one who has absolutely no idea who GhoulyBits is?
Best president.ghoulybits wrote:
A rather irrelevant userhis everything wrote:
Am I the only one who has absolutely no idea who GhoulyBits is?
No.
Jonarwhal wrote:
we can’t just put everyone into one category that wouldn’t really be helpfulReyalp51 wrote:
i suggested the name cock enjoyers
THE HUMAN BEINGS
Can you count my OT posts (IDK how many)
2BluePyTheDeer_ wrote:
Can you count my OT posts (IDK how many)
At least one.BluePyTheDeer_ wrote:
Can you count my OT posts (IDK how many)
103 post.BluePyTheDeer_ wrote:
Can you count my OT posts (IDK how many)
Each page consist 50 post so you have 2 whole pages. As the current requirement of denizen you need 10pages of post to complete the post requirement
ghoulybits wrote:
A rather irrelevant userhis everything wrote:
Am I the only one who has absolutely no idea who GhoulyBits is?
I think I could distribute my userscript that shows the OT posts that each one has, but I don't know if anyone will use it.Manishh wrote:
103 post.BluePyTheDeer_ wrote:
Can you count my OT posts (IDK how many)
Each page consist 50 post so you have 2 whole pages. As the current requirement of denizen you need 10pages of post to complete the post requirement
Exemple:
Topic Starter
NOTICE
This user has been in OT for what is almost 2 years now, however, they seem to have mostly gone under the radar, as their post frequency was low. But regardless of that, this user currently meets all of the requirements for denizen!. This user has recently made quite creative threads like guess the map. They're also very friendly and chill. For all of those reasons and more, nominomu has been named denizen!, congratulations!
Congratulations nominomu!
gg
ok i have at least seen the others in OT but this guy i unironically have never seen post in here, just remove the denizen system already?
copeZain Sugieres wrote:
ok i have at least seen the others in OT but this guy i unironically have never seen post in here, just remove the denizen system already?
"Errm, remove the hecking denizen already!!" ACK.
crazy how i dont even remember what made u so mad but yet i still live rent free in ur headYmir wrote:
"Errm, remove the hecking denizen already!!" ACK.
FalseZain Sugieres wrote:
crazy how i dont even remember what made u so mad but yet i still live rent free in ur headYmir wrote:
"Errm, remove the hecking denizen already!!" ACK.
May I request to be removed from the system
what
Topic Starter
sureWimpy Cursed wrote:
May I request to be removed from the system
too cool for the denizen systemWimpy Cursed wrote:
May I request to be removed from the system
half a year latar he comes back and post a tumbs up emoji mad respect- cirno - wrote:
👍
my computer keyboard got limeade on it so I didn't have the pc for half a year -w-Reyalp51 wrote:
half a year latar he comes back and post a tumbs up emoji mad respect- cirno - wrote:
👍
oh, right, forgot that was a thing nowWimpy Cursed wrote:
May I request to be removed from the system
me too, please
Topic Starter
donecephaphysic wrote:
oh, right, forgot that was a thing nowWimpy Cursed wrote:
May I request to be removed from the system
me too, please
oof- cirno - wrote:
my computer keyboard got limeade on it so I didn't have the pc for half a year -w-Reyalp51 wrote:
half a year latar he comes back and post a tumbs up emoji mad respect- cirno - wrote:
👍
welcome back bud
mark of a new movementcephaphysic wrote:
oh, right, forgot that was a thing nowWimpy Cursed wrote:
May I request to be removed from the system
me too, please
I guess the example I found was just completely different
Topic Starter
the deefinition was correct, it's just a way of speaking, they don't actually mean a biblical raptureWimpy Cursed wrote:
I guess the example I found was just completely different
hiB0ii wrote:
oof- cirno - wrote:
my computer keyboard got limeade on it so I didn't have the pc for half a year -w-Reyalp51 wrote:
half a year latar he comes back and post a tumbs up emoji mad respect- cirno - wrote:
👍
welcome back bud
oh my god, oh my god guys, Im actually a denizen
edit: yeah I didn't see the original post
edit: yeah I didn't see the original post
Patatitta wrote:
NOTICE
For our next esteemed member, we might just need to summon some Giant Piloted Robots to hand them their well-deserved title. This individual is a connoisseur of all gaming classics, from exhilarating shoot 'em ups to intense fighting games. While they're not busy shaking up the status quo and reshaping the meta of OT, you can bet on finding them contributing their insights in just about every corner of the "Other" subforum. Let's give a resounding round of applause to: MaxIsABigKaiju!
lumping people from 2008 and 2017 together and calling this fabricated era "glorified forum games" (???) is the most patatitta thing i've ever seen. i suppose this works well for a fanfiction project
Nice Job
Nice Job
Topic Starter
what description would you give?, up to 2013 or so it isn't too shitposty like it is now, and I decided to write that since like, more than half that age was like thatSerraionga wrote:
lumping people from 2008 and 2017 together and calling this fabricated era "glorified forum games" (???) is the most patatitta thing i've ever seen. i suppose this works well for a fanfiction project
Nice Job
How much posts do I have?
Topic Starter
you can check it yourself, ~320BluePyTheDeer_ wrote:
How much posts do I have?
I miss the old thread.
what.
idk mannpc_BeaniCraft wrote:
what.
So why did we get rid of the clear distinctions between generations? I hate to say it but I prefer abrakers system faaaaar more than this.
Topic Starter
You literally areOffdensen wrote:
how am i not in here
cry moreKobold84 wrote:
I miss the old thread.
The gen "distinctions" were basically a combination of gaslighting and very subjective reasoning, abraker changed gens whenever it just felt right, for gen 10 and 11 in fact there were a lot of drama with the generation change because it just made no sense, if you were to actually sit down and see the culture of each gen, you would realize it's basically the same all the way around.Ashton wrote:
So why did we get rid of the clear distinctions between generations? I hate to say it but I prefer abrakers system faaaaar more than this.
It was changed to have a system that is more clear, easier to understand, that creates less drama, and so far, this thread has achieved it's goal.
aren't you like the most hated president in ot history
Taco wrote:
create less drama
Uh.Taco wrote:
achieved its goal
Topic Starter
by oldfagAshton wrote:
aren't you like the most hated president in ot history
I mean, the current "drama" is that i'm not abraker, any change to the system would have created that reaction, however, the actual system hasn't really backfired once yet, no drama about gens changing when they should be, of people not beig added 6 momnths after they meet the requirement, no drama about if someone should be removed from denizen, etc, it's been working as it should beYmir wrote:
Taco wrote:
create less dramaUh.Taco wrote:
achieved its goal
i apologize for incidentally adding onto the pressure, i dont have a particularly strong opinion either way, but i'd like to understand:Patatitta wrote:
by oldfagAshton wrote:
aren't you like the most hated president in ot historyI mean, the current "drama" is that i'm not abraker, any change to the system would have created that reaction, however, the actual system hasn't really backfired once yet, no drama about gens changing when they should be, of people not beig added 6 momnths after they meet the requirement, no drama about if someone should be removed from denizen, etc, it's been working as it should beYmir wrote:
Taco wrote:
create less dramaUh.Taco wrote:
achieved its goal
how is it that the "current drama" is necessarily about you not being abraker?
(and does it not seem plausible that there were things abraker did that people happen to prefer? i can't really point to those distinctions myself, so i don't really have an argument to make in posing this follow-up question, but i also think it might be fair to consider this if it's not something that can be explained)
I wonder if the lack of drama stems from the fact that denizen has lost all meaning after all your changes; though I do recall that making denizen meaningless (or deleting entirely) was one of your goals.
Topic Starter
nah it's not pressure, you haven't been here when I first got president, people wanted me GONE badlyAchromalia wrote:
i apologize for incidentally adding onto the pressure, i dont have a particularly strong opinion either way, but i'd like to understand:Patatitta wrote:
by oldfagAshton wrote:
aren't you like the most hated president in ot historyI mean, the current "drama" is that i'm not abraker, any change to the system would have created that reaction, however, the actual system hasn't really backfired once yet, no drama about gens changing when they should be, of people not beig added 6 momnths after they meet the requirement, no drama about if someone should be removed from denizen, etc, it's been working as it should beYmir wrote:
Taco wrote:
create less dramaUh.Taco wrote:
achieved its goal
how is it that the "current drama" is necessarily about you not being abraker?
(and does it not seem plausible that there were things abraker did that people happen to prefer? i can't really point to those distinctions myself, so i don't really have an argument to make in posing this follow-up question, but i also think it might be fair to consider this if it's not something that can be explained)
Me not being abraker is not the reason, however it kinda illustrates the point I want to make, if you were to look at the original denizen thread in a more objective way, you would see the system we used to have failed at it, if the point was to preserve OT history, it was too confusing to understand and each gen lacked the context for a new user to come in OT and understand it, the gen changes were mainly defined by OT lore, which you will have noticed it's currently very absent from current OT, so abraker just started changing the gens when it just felt right, which led to many problems, since at that point in time abraker wasn't really active in OT and was pretty out of touch with many things, however, abraker ruling kept being king because well, he was abraker, the person with the most authority in OT.
the system just didn't work, and the people running the thread just started freeballing it, the requirements were not enforced, people who met the 8 month activity requirement and had created many posts and threads didn't get denizen while someone like blushing, who didn't meet the requirements, got it, and instead of just reversing the changes, a vote was held to decide if the very obvious rule breakin should be reversed, no vote for blushing to get in but one for him to get out, the system was biased as fuck.
But well, most people in OT never really challenged the system, for most people the denizen thread existed even from before they joined OT or osu and would probably still exist for the day they quit, everyone just was used to it. + you, as a newfag, even if you saw flaws with the system, you didn't have the authority to criticize it.
Then I come in and actually change the system, changing the thing everyone is used to basing myself on the problems people had learn to ignore, not only that, but I wasn't abraker, if abraker wanted to change something in OT, they could just do it, no question asked, I don't have that level of power. It's natural for people to be really mad at me, however, I truly think that i'm in the right with the changes I have made, so I don't really care
also, the people actually criticizing me are like the same 3 people every time, the wider OT community doesn't really seem to care, is that because denizen has lost all prestige?, maybe, I do personally think some people do care enough to check this thread and don't really see anything wrong with it, people still react at the announcements and shit
Imagine being angry at an imaginary title on a shitposting forum.
imagine being passionate about itWinnyace wrote:
Imagine being angry at an imaginary title on a shitposting forum.
imagine the chances of everyone being conventionally human and probably having/lacking investments that don't necessarily depend on another person's understanding or approvalPolyspora wrote:
imagine being passionate about itWinnyace wrote:
Imagine being angry at an imaginary title on a shitposting forum.
can you dumb this downAchromalia wrote:
imagine the chances of everyone being conventionally human and probably having/lacking investments that don't necessarily depend on another person's understanding or approvalPolyspora wrote:
imagine being passionate about itWinnyace wrote:
Imagine being angry at an imaginary title on a shitposting forum.
you and i and those nerds are all persons, and it is normal that people tend to care (or not care) about different things, which can easily happen whether or not someone else agrees or thinks it makes sensePolyspora wrote:
can you dumb this downAchromalia wrote:
imagine the chances of everyone being conventionally human and probably having/lacking investments that don't necessarily depend on another person's understanding or approvalPolyspora wrote:
imagine being passionate about itWinnyace wrote:
Imagine being angry at an imaginary title on a shitposting forum.
(the unstated message: "posting about how weird it might be that someone cares or doesn't care about a certain thing is not very useful, probably. if you want to know, ask why. if you don't, idk i guess you're free to be boring if you don't want to leave it alone")
((that being said, i don't actually expect that or want to impose any of that, i'm just satisfying my own need to be correct~))
My comment was semi-sarcastic. One is free to care about whatever they please, just that I hope they can be rational individuals too and not start flame wars. I look at my time advocating Linux here as pretty cringe for this exact reason.Achromalia wrote:
you and i and those nerds are all persons, and it is normal that people tend to care (or not care) about different things, which can easily happen whether or not someone else agrees or thinks it makes sense
(personal information revealed that wasnt supposed to be here please ignore)Achromalia wrote:
Polyspora wrote:
can you dumb this downAchromalia wrote:
imagine the chances of everyone being conventionally human and probably having/lacking investments that don't necessarily depend on another person's understanding or approvalPolyspora wrote:
imagine being passionate about itWinnyace wrote:
Imagine being angry at an imaginary title on a shitposting forum.you and i and those nerds are all persons, and it is normal that people tend to care (or not care) about different things, which can easily happen whether or not someone else agrees or thinks it makes sense
(the unstated message: "posting about how weird it might be that someone cares or doesn't care about a certain thing is not very useful, probably. if you want to know, ask why. if you don't, idk i guess you're free to be boring if you don't want to leave it alone")
((that being said, i don't actually expect that or want to impose any of that, i'm just satisfying my own need to be correct~))
*to gmts, silence.
tf character development!?!?Winnyace wrote:
My comment was semi-sarcastic. One is free to care about whatever they please, just that I hope they can be rational individuals too and not start flame wars. I look at my time advocating Linux here as pretty cringe for this exact reason.Achromalia wrote:
you and i and those nerds are all persons, and it is normal that people tend to care (or not care) about different things, which can easily happen whether or not someone else agrees or thinks it makes sense
Nice, I just wanted to check out OT and found that this drama is still going on lmao.
The latest 'age' has definitely lost meaning for 'me' since the requirement is low for 'my standard' and there are few in the 'age' that never became such a big part in OT to be rewarded with a title and not to mention there is one who still is not accepted as a part of this community.
Though, plus a point to patatitta, at least now I can distinguish which 'age' I dont see as quality.
Also if anyone wonders why I am not active. The biggest part is that I have lot interest and the 2nd biggest part is that I am trying to fix my life, trying to spend more time on useful stuff, focusing on exercise, quality sleep, quality study times and not fuck my mind over this forum. Cya I will see the next time I visit
The latest 'age' has definitely lost meaning for 'me' since the requirement is low for 'my standard' and there are few in the 'age' that never became such a big part in OT to be rewarded with a title and not to mention there is one who still is not accepted as a part of this community.
Though, plus a point to patatitta, at least now I can distinguish which 'age' I dont see as quality.
Also if anyone wonders why I am not active. The biggest part is that I have lot interest and the 2nd biggest part is that I am trying to fix my life, trying to spend more time on useful stuff, focusing on exercise, quality sleep, quality study times and not fuck my mind over this forum. Cya I will see the next time I visit
i'd genuinely celebrate that for you, and if you're finding some growth in enjoying time outside this wasteland, then i sure as hell would love to see you continue on with that. i can't imagine many people here will stop you from enjoying your life, it's a good thing to get to have and your time is a limited and permanent resource of continuity :>Manishh wrote:
Nice, I just wanted to check out OT and found that this drama is still going on lmao.
The latest 'age' has definitely lost meaning for 'me' since the requirement is low for 'my standard' and there are few in the 'age' that never became such a big part in OT to be rewarded with a title and not to mention there is one who still is not accepted as a part of this community.
Though, plus a point to patatitta, at least now I can distinguish which 'age' I dont see as quality.
Also if anyone wonders why I am not active. The biggest part is that I have lot interest and the 2nd biggest part is that I am trying to fix my life, trying to spend more time on useful stuff, focusing on exercise, quality sleep, quality study times and not fuck my mind over this forum. Cya I will see the next time I visit
as for the forum now, i really enjoy ot as it is. it's not as fun as it was during my age of roleplay, but i don't really need thrills to be content with the community here
though i won't exactly mind if someone comes out with a neat idea that everyone can play a part in~ but it really depends on who cares and whether an event even needs someone to care in order to be effective ot lore
anyway, go fix your life! savor something meaningful to you, find out what you can do for yourself and others ^^
Aren't the requirements higher than ever before though?Manishh wrote:
The latest 'age' has definitely lost meaning for 'me' since the requirement is low for 'my standard' and there are few in the 'age' that never became such a big part in OT to be rewarded with a title and not to mention there is one who still is not accepted as a part of this community.
Is this a joke to do an epic dunk on the haters or is this a genuine question?Karmine wrote:
Aren't the requirements higher than ever before though?
Topic Starter
no, karmine is right, the new requirements are the highest they've ever been, it's just that previous to that requirement were only a suggestion, so in practice, it kinda works different, IMO betterYmir wrote:
Is this a joke to do an epic dunk on the haters or is this a genuine question?Karmine wrote:
Aren't the requirements higher than ever before though?
proud to be writing history
What's higher about the new requirement? The hardest part of the old stuff was the achievement aspect.Patatitta wrote:
no, karmine is right, the new requirements are the highest they've ever been, it's just that previous to that requirement were only a suggestion, so in practice, it kinda works different, IMO betterYmir wrote:
Is this a joke to do an epic dunk on the haters or is this a genuine question?Karmine wrote:
Aren't the requirements higher than ever before though?
If the requirements were as high as you've claimed the denizens Emjakolic, MaxIsABigKaiju, Kori and BeaniCraft would not be denizens in the first place, unless you know something about them that I don't.
Otherwise I assume the requirement increase you must be referring to post count and time spent on the forum, which isn't really difficult.
Granted I don't know where to find these new requirements so I don't really know what's going on. No, I have not actively looked for it, so I'm aware that's a fault on my part.
Topic Starter
the achievement thing wasn't actually explicit in the requirements, it's just something that it was added on extraordinarily, I mean the time and post requirement are the highestYmir wrote:
What's higher about the new requirement? The hardest part of the old stuff was the achievement aspect.Patatitta wrote:
no, karmine is right, the new requirements are the highest they've ever been, it's just that previous to that requirement were only a suggestion, so in practice, it kinda works different, IMO betterYmir wrote:
Is this a joke to do an epic dunk on the haters or is this a genuine question?Karmine wrote:
Aren't the requirements higher than ever before though?
If the requirements were as high as you've claimed the denizens Emjakolic, MaxIsABigKaiju, Kori and BeaniCraft would not be denizens in the first place, unless you know something about them that I don't.
Otherwise I assume the requirement increase you must be referring to post count and time spent on the forum, which isn't really difficult.
Granted I don't know where to find these new requirements so I don't really know what's going on. No, I have not actively looked for it, so I'm aware that's a fault on my part.
Considering that this is the first time (at least in the time I've spent here) that meeting a certain post number and time is the only factor necessary, I'd argue that it's much easier to get denizenship now despite the whole requirement thing being some add-on.
On a side note, I was under the impression that denizenship required 20 pages previously (1000 posts I believe). I'll probably need to fact check that sometime later.
On a side note, I was under the impression that denizenship required 20 pages previously (1000 posts I believe). I'll probably need to fact check that sometime later.
The thing about needing to actually "achieve" something on OT was added quite late (in the history of denizenship) never really enforced, if it was there would have been almost no denizen since.Ymir wrote:
Considering that this is the first time (at least in the time I've spent here) that meeting a certain post number and time is the only factor necessary, I'd argue that it's much easier to get denizenship now despite the whole requirement thing being some add-on.
On a side note, I was under the impression that denizenship required 20 pages previously (1000 posts I believe). I'll probably need to fact check that sometime later.
When there were events it would have been people who organised them but now OT is less big things and more small things so most people don't do anything significant aside from just being here, which imo is enough to be considered a part of the community.